DreadDirective Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world.	Debate	DreadDirective	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 06:55 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. A world where sexes shift to extracting their primary source of dopamine away from shared mutually generating activities between genders.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:49 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. This really isn't persuasive, given the growing population bust and happier alone sentiment.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:48 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. Not really. Like I said, most men's lives didn't change after electing Trump. But as a pastime or sport, it's enjoyable to pursue these things even without any tangible benefit. It's like watching baseball.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:46 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. Well, any right can be democratically voted through due process.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:43 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. That's a bit rude. I was polite.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:42 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. I would say a woman who's happier alone and child free, is never "prosocial" by default. That's an atomistic individual that's already committed to maximum selfishness. And for everyone of those women, you'll automatically generate a corresponding male in reaction. Even if it wasn't their original goal, they adapted to the divergence.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:41 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. I meant it didn't change positively for most men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:38 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. I think what I said is no less abhorrent than women celebrating abortions with the procedure being recorded live on tiktok.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:35 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. Birth rates and proto happier alone movements existed long before 2008.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:33 PM
–	It’s a sound male strategy to vote away women’s rights for entertainment value in a divergent sex world. That's possible, but it doesn't contradict the underlying value extracted.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 04:32 PM
-1	Egg freezing symbolizes a big failure of feminism. The insidious part about this scientific "success" is that it inadvertently lowers the population rate by providing a less reliable alternative. It encourages false hope through qualitatively worse optionality. It's like a microwave meal with less nutrients but more convenience, except in this case the outcome is pass/fail.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/08/26 10:27 PM
1	[ Removed by moderator ] Counter points: - Men do not have 50-80 years if they want children. They're on the same clock as women since it takes two to tango. If a woman hits the wall at 30 and becomes infertile at ~40, then men only have a 10 year window to lock down a woman for having children, which needs to be divided over the number of children. I'll grant that men have a polygamy cheat code, but we're assuming monogamy. - Men have a single metric they can "control", which is financial status. But this is stacked ag…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/08/26 10:22 PM