TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dreamless_ Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by Dreamless_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Have your friend forward you the email and you somehow timestamp it.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:23 AM
2

I found the professor's professional online resume that's hosted on University of Akron's website. I won't post it here due to reddit's anti-doxxing rules, but it can be found in less than 5 minutes, even if your google-fu is weak.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:20 AM
27

Jesus, that's 10 guys a year, assuming the caveat of "only penetration counts". No telling how much higher that 60-count is if we include blow jobs, hand jobs, etc.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 05:19 PM
12

Not wanting sex in a committed LTR especially when sex has been on the table before and one of the conditions the LTR is established upon is behavior that needs to be corrected. Choosing to finger-fuck a mindless, social media black hole over sex with the person you're supposed to please and be affectionate with is DAMN sure behavior that needs to be corrected.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 04:40 PM
3

I read this in Dante Nero's voice.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 07:15 PM
22

Yes. Something something master key and faulty lock.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 08:09 AM
-7

hate's not anger To-may-to, to-mah-to. If I'm not thinking about a song during the day, I am indifferent to it. I am not angry towards it. Anger leads to hate.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:46 AM
0

Friend, I'm not arguing that. I may not agree with any one person's reason for being angry at feminism or staying in the anger phase, but I'll fight for their right to take that stand. My point is it's all about picking your battles. Sooner or later, you HAVE to weigh the pros and cons of what you're getting yourself into and weigh the worth of the fight against your worth of self. It's only up to you to decide which one means more to you in the short- and long-term. You can stay mad at feminism…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:37 AM
41

No, not hate. Hate is for too reactionary and filled with ulterior motive. Men should be aware of modern feminism and the role it plays in shaping society's norms, but only insofar as to bend the rules of the game to his favor. If you think you're going to "win" this game through hate, you're sorely mistaken. Go ahead and be mad at feminism, be resentful of it, whatever the case is. We've all been there shortly after getting unplugged. But to let it become a drain on your fight to the top, your …
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:06 AM
5

Anger is the fire, logic is the temper. You can't forge a sword with just one. Right the fuck on. My balls feel bigger reading that.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 02:51 PM
23

Beige Phillip rule #4: A woman falls in love with you for everything that you are. She spends the rest of the relationship trying to change you into everything that you're not. If she succeeds, she will dump you for the guy who is what you were when she met you.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 11:34 PM
0

Stop mistaking outcome independence for anger and denial. They either come up to my level or they get nothing from me; I am the prize. If the bitch don't play your game, you don't play.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 07:29 AM
-1

I don't understand how you can be this dense. You are still equating a woman's tendency towards emotional responses that drive her to cheat to an open relationship and in doing so, enabling the very hypergamy that drives this notion by proverbially sticking your head in the sand. By this logic, as soon as the thought of cheating crosses her mind, the relationship is suddenly, magically, inexplicably open, regardless of the stance her man has taken on the matter (or whether or not she followed th…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 03:00 AM
-1

just because you declare to one another you are exclusive doesn't mean you are What the fuck. Yes it does. If a bitch and I are agreeing to be exclusive, we are defining the nature and boundaries of the very relationship. If she changes her mind later and steps outside of that of her own volition without my knowledge or consent, it does NOT make my relationship open. It DOES make her a cheating whore. The linchpin here being that I did not agree to her side dick. THAT is where the discrepancy li…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 10:12 PM
1

But your relationship is open No, it's not. If she gets dick outside of a relationship I decide is monogamous, the relationship isn't open; it's over. She is a cheater and unless the dick she cheated with foolishly takes her on, she is then single.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 12:48 AM
0

No it's not; you're forgetting any and all wildcards that will work in my favor, i.e. proof of adultery whether through text messages, email, audio or video, thereby entitling her to nothing. Besides, we're not specifically talking marriage. This topic is relationships in general, whether legally official through the state or not. Yeah, sure, you'd have to be a fool to get married in the U.S. these days, but I stand firm on my position that all relationships being open whether I like it or not i…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 12:33 AM
3

Forgiving them so you don't hold disdain, resentment and other poisons in your heart, sure. Keeping them around after the fact, however, I would never recommend.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 05:34 PM
3

free license for side action Maybe according to you, but not according to me. My relationship would be no more open before marriage than it would after, simply because I SAID SO. If the bitch cheats, I divorce her ass. It's as simple as that. Everyone in this thread pushing the idea that all relationships are open based solely on a woman's inherent hypergamy are really overthinking this. If I decide to foolishly open my relationship, that's on me. But it is NOT open unless I make that choice. If…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 05:23 PM
2

Again, the relationship is not open. If I enter into one with the expectation of monogamy, I am clearly setting the boundaries of what I will and won't tolerate. Her propensity to get side dick doesn't automatically trump my standards, it makes her a cheater. So to say my relationship is open whether I like it or not is complete bullshit. It absolves her of responsibility and the maturity required to uphold her end of the relationship and removes my agency to declare what I want and expect from …
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 11:09 AM
3

balance There is none. If I fuck several girls, it's to prevent oneitis/neediness and it's purely physical. As a man, I do not depend on their resources (financial or otherwise), thus I'm not looking for the next branch to swing to like they are. Sexual strategy is amoral.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 10:32 AM
16

all relationships are open No, they are not. If I am giving a woman my commitment, I expect the same from her. Details beyond that depend on us as individuals. If she decides to go get some dick outside of the relationship, I end it entirely, thus it is not open. I do not agree with or tolerate her obtaining dick (or the next possible branch) and if she does, I take away my commitment and other resources. The relationship simply ends.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 09:46 AM
1

Even then, it's still no guarantee that she'll stay that way or that you'll be the first and last to "corrupt" her (for lack of a more eloquent term). The only foolproof way to stay on top of the dating game is to remain outcome independent. Stay in a perpetual state of self-improvement, regardless of your medium--new hobbies, studying new topics, working out, professional advancement, etc. As long as you stay on a course of regular self-fulfillment, it does not matter whether you plate a slut w…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 05:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter