TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DrivenDogged Archive

View 1 post and 25 comments by DrivenDogged on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

CMVDrivenDogged/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 05:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, question. How do you think geopolitics has had a role in reshaping the sexual environment? I mean, America was settled by Puritans. These were some straightlaced people. Yes, others came later of various morals, but at what point did those morals, and their modern evolutes courtesy of contraception and washing machines, come to supplant the previously marriage-fixated moralist position of moral superiority? I think you'll find the change of something more than demographics at play. War. Es…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 02:42 AM
1

Okay, your hatred of the rights of women. Maybe you don't hate women. But, putting myself in other shoes as is necessary to form balanced opinions, were I a woman, what advantage could I possibly gain from a relation with you who would curtail any enterprise I desired? You have to ask yourself that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:27 PM
1

Do you think involuntary celibacy has anything to do with your misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:17 PM
1

You're a celibate? Voluntary or involuntary?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:13 PM
1

Though we both see continuing to be a waste of time, I am nonetheless curious if you've read Solway and your opinion. Oh, and the questions I asked (you may not have seen before edit) about your own sexual strategy in this 'women's world'?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:04 PM
1

And where do you think these abstractions descend from? The great goddess? What happens when men close their doors and we are back to square one? And why have they the temerity to ask for it? They descend from humanity, of course, most particularly the sense of compassion, good will and justice which is innate in men and cultivated in large part at the teat. Your housewife blogger misunderstands completely the concept of inalienable rights as used in the original Declaration of Independence - wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 05:29 PM
1

Nevermind that their 'earned' 'equality' is bunk as I've told you before. Where, when and how? Women cannot achieve anything in science, technology, industry? Reality belies this. It's all built atop a bunch of lies of those radicals, it invalidates everything they think they stand for. Radical lies are, like your own, mostly halftruths twisted to accord with unenlightened self-interests. Aside from the fact that not all moderate feminists, ie the crowd that simply wants equality before the law,…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 05:17 PM
1

They've always been radicals, the 'moderates' are useful idiots who do the bidding and are thrown out once they stop being useful. Why do I have to keep repeating this to you? Because it's only half the truth. They're useful idiots from the perspective of the manipulative radicals, yes - I haven't disputed this. But this doesn't invalidate the views that made them useful to the radicals - or useful to the non-radicals, only the system of allegiance. That is what you are sidestepping; the useful …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 05:03 PM
1

"Moderate feminists" post third wave are radicals by objective measure. And quite treated as such. Perhaps not where you live but elsewhere one can find many rational women who sometimes - and sometimes not - identify as feminists but understand that equality before the law can be granted, yet equality of status must be earned - and do earn it with their academic and professional achievements. Because you took it in a direction where it wasn't supposed to go. Pray tell, where is spewing hate for…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:41 PM
1

I don't think feminism is what you understand it to be - you see the radicals foremost because shrillmost, and so don't see the forest for the trees. This is what allows you to spew hate on people like Wollstonecraft whom I doubt you have read much of. Also, you apparently want a return to a broken status quo that is not even in your advantage or the advantage of your children. Do you want your children's first education to be handled by an illiterate slob prone to adultery as the last resort of…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:28 PM
1

Children of slaves and cowards. This is something to be ashamed of? You are a child of slaves and cowards. Rajput Yadavs? Really? Come, now. The whole Gandhian nonsense is a fucking joke. And Savarkar? Hedgewar & Golwarkar? Bose? Godse? So it's totally fine that India lay prostrate beneath a foreign boot by strength of modern arms and organizational/economic prowess? This never should have been rescinded, the British never should have grown weary of the winnings rightfully theirs, the losers had…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:14 PM
1

It isn't, feminists get to claim everything and at the same time hold men morally responsible for not giving it to them earlier, so they are equal and yet they are better. This is the modern world, turned upside down on its head where the winners are supposed to feel bad and the losers wear their badges of loserdom with pride. Agreeing with the first sentence, the second is but generalities too widely stretched. Are conquered peoples losers? They are the most loser-ly of all losers by Darwinian …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 03:56 PM
1

Fortunately, I didn't have feminism hammered into my head very much - also I've been reprogramming myself from every kind of conditioning I could find for some time now. That's not to say I'm immune or have fully eliminated such, only that given my readiness to spot and address programming, I am not the average fem-bot and my criticisms are not those of kneejerk programmed reaction to anti-feminism. Your arguments start good, you accurately describe the worst of the radicals claiming for themsel…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 03:28 PM
1

The arguments start out good and then turn into nonsense (especially around education), I'm sorry to say. Is this you? Also, how does this address Wollstonecraft?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 02:56 AM
1

I'm sure what you're feeding them now is far more useful, at least, for people growing gardens.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:28 PM
1

Just wanted to say that I agree with you/this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:24 PM
1

I don't understand your comment but it seems you're trying to be obscurantist and asking for clarity would be met with smoke and mirrors, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:23 PM
1

Also, are you just trolling, or do you really find that much objection to Wollstonecraft? Out of most of the feminists I've read, I've found her to be one of the most rational and even-handed. I can't recall anything said by her objectionable, with the qualified exception of her attitude towards sexuality which befit her times and the precarious political position of women's sexuality commonly alleged to be a socially destabilizing force. Of course it is, but not as it was had to be then.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:02 PM
2

Will nobody help the poor widow's son - with a straight answer!?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 07:50 PM
1

So does this mean a return to what they ignorantly - and/or deceitfully - call patriarchy? Or something new?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 07:48 PM
1

Do I understand correctly that you wish to go back to the way things used to be? If so, how is that way distinguishable from [socially contracted] lies?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 07:41 PM
3

Part II: And the world men had made was not one that was made with women in mind, which is precisely why women fought for the right to vote in the first place -- so they could change that! Now this is just silly. Of course it was a world with women in mind. This also exhibits that fallacy I mention; that feminists like to believe men ‘did this to them.’ Men didn’t. A very small subset of men “did it” to everyone, men and women both. Yes, women got shorter sticks than men on average, but men got …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 07:26 PM
3

Ah, okay, now we are getting somewhere! And how does one dominate? Through the exertion of power! And if you had to say either men or women held more power in society, what is the obvious answer? I don’t know about the obvious, socially received answer you’re looking for, but I do know about the correct answer: the (trick) question is a red herring and precisely the sort of misdirection that makes feminism fail. It’s not a question of “either men or women” holding more power, it’s a question of …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 07:26 PM
1

Umm no, nothing of the sort. It really hasn't changed much since its 'modern' inception. The goals may not have changed. It's indisputable that the state of their realization has progressed nearer reality. And, of course, the goals actually have changed and multiplied. Different groups have different goals. The goals publicly articulated to gain support from the votebase and the court of public opinion were decidedly and necessarily more conservative than out-and-out revolution privately promulg…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 06:45 PM
1

Feminism and the MRM are not polar opposites, MRM don't talk of Matriachy, they warn of it but don't blame everything on it like Feminists do with Patriarchy. They're opposites in the sense that they involve two groups in opposition; gendered interest groups. Of course the doctrines are asymmetrical because so is history. Men have little basis for complaining of an out-and-out matriarchy given there hasn't been one until quite lately, and that only in an abstract and state-mediated form. The MRM…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 06:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter