TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Driversuz Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by Driversuz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Keep trying, you poor thing. And thank you for giving all of these people the opportunity to publicly (and completely) discredit your arguments.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 06:03 PM
0

You know who ends up "most injured?" The children, who learn from their mothers that hitting loved ones is OK. WRA doesn't mind that though, does it? It ensures another generation of victims on whose backs WRA can beg for m ore funding.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:55 PM
0

There is no credible study Credible to whom? WRA employees whose cushy jobs depend on perpetuating bigoted lies? Are you one of them? Or are you singing your dame propaganda song for free? Either way, it's no longer working.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:51 PM
1

By all means, do encourage people to look closely at how little of WRA's money goes to actual victims of DV, and how much goes to staff salaries and perks.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:44 PM
1

I rarely disagree with you, but today I do. Watch the Ralph Retort's Killstream #4 from Oct 31 (interview with Cassie.) She has already spent thousands out of her own pocket, and is not even looking to recoup that. This is a tiny budget for a film of the caliber that Cassie produces.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:57 PM
2

Oh dear. You're going to be banned now.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:42 AM
1

Isn't it nice when trolls give you the opportunity to clarify the truth?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:26 PM
2

A couple of years ago when WBB tried this same stunt, I did a rough estimate based on her assumptions. It was about $4.50 per hour.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:01 AM
2

Oh it's worse than you know. Elam has women working for him over there too! And gasp TradCons! And L-l-l-liberals! And I wonder if perhaps 160k every year isn't a conservative estimate; for all we know he could be raking in half a million and spending it on hookers and blow!
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:53 AM
3

Well now, wouldn't it be just dandy if they wanted to "end" the rape of MALES in the military?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:37 PM
1

heh...heh...heh
/r/MensRights22/11/13 11:30 PM
5

Who on earth would want the respect of the "mainstream" in this culture? AVfM wants the attention of the mainstream. Once exposed to the MHRM, people with brains will figure it out. They always do.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 11:30 PM
5

It's possible but I have my doubts. Among other things, it completely ignores what Campbell said to the press. Then again I don't doubt AT ALL that Campbell was NOT the sole perpetrator of the reckless intimidation of Christian. Campbell would never have made the threatening statements, nor would he have publicized them, without the full support of the school board and the rest of the admin in his school.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:11 AM
4

That would be a good point if feminists weren't manipulating and lying about the statistics in an attempt to prove that women are the primary (or at least most important) victims of nearly everything.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:08 PM
1

Are you implying that men are responsible for the well-being of women who don't care to be responsible for their own well-being? That sounds a lot like good old fashioned Fundamentalist Christian Chauvinism. I haven't answered you because I've pretty much stopped following this inane conversation. Do yourself a favor; go visit http://www.avoiceformen.com/ http://dalrock.wordpress.com/ and http://www.the-spearhead.com/ If you want to learn something, do some reading. If you already know everythin…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:43 AM
1

No evidence? Are you kidding me? Two itty bitty facts for you: 1. Males have a proven greater aptitude for math, and there is a bit of connection between math and logic. 2. Women's hormones fluctuate radically, and emotions have been known to override logic. That's the kindergarten version; I'm not sure you can handle much more than that.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:33 AM
0

" I believe I am worth more than the embodiment of my offspring." If you choose to have offspring, they should be the most important accomplishment in your life. Therefore, a good parent really is worth VERY LITTLE more. And that used to be considered a rather high status, before feminism decided that "no woman should stay home and raise her own children." Sorry, but that's the way it has always been, and committing to that principle is why we are not extinct. The fact that this commitment is no…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/12 01:53 AM
1

"all the woman's life is related to her kids and her husband. All other priorities are set on the back-burner." Duh!!! If raising your children isn't the single most important "priority" in your life, For God's sake, DON'T HAVE ANY KIDS! Motherhood is not a "career." It is not a "hobby," a "lifestyle", or an "experience" designed to enrich YOU. It is YOUR contribution to the future, if you choose to make that contribution. Children are human beings, not accessories. And men have "less to lose?" …
/r/TheRedPill28/12/12 01:01 AM
1

heh heh: http://shiningpearlsofsomething.blogspot.com/2012/12/a-rare-photo.html
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:17 PM
2

Why is this such an ideal? Because the primary purpose of sex is reproduction. Men desire, in future wives, women who don't have a ten-year history of shallow relationships, abortions and STDs, women who are not ball-busting control freaks, and who are likely more committed to their careers than they will ever be to their families. For the mother of his children, a man wants a woman for whom the desire to BE a mother is her FIRST priority, and the primary goal of everything she does, not a "seco…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/12 04:53 AM
6

That's what they always say. Then they hit 30 or so, and all of their friends are married, and the "man who complements them" is now courting 22 year olds. Then they either become disillusioned with men (whose fault it obviously is) or they realize that if they want to be married, they'll have to "settle for" those guys they ignored a decade ago.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/12 03:43 AM
7

It is women, not men, who assign promiscuous men their "high value." Women desire "experienced" men
/r/TheRedPill26/12/12 12:03 AM
1

"That seems like a misogynistic attitude. " Your words, not mine.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/12 09:48 PM
8

"You should revamp your point of view for everyone else's benefit. Your benefit is of no interest to me." There. Fixed it for you.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/12 07:25 PM
14

How is it misogynistic to for a man to not want to marry and financially support a used-up slut who's looking for a guy to "settle for," after a decade in the amusement park? Do you believe men who don't DESIRE such women, "hate" women in general? That's a pretty brooooooaaaaaad definition of "misogyny," don't you think? I mean, by that standard we could say that it's "misandrist" for women to not want to date/sleep with those socially awkward, sweet, sincere guys who will someday be good provid…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/12 07:24 PM
2

You did not refute a single point, you merely tossed out a vague, all encompassing dismissive distraction; I gave you a list of the other most common vague, all encompassing dismissive distractions. Apparently you can't even be bothered to be thorough in your generalizations. Either that or you can't tell the difference between emotions and logical thought.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:10 PM
7

You forgot to add "NAWALT!!!!" a reference to Oedipus, and "I'm sure those grapes are sour anyway." Slacker.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:53 PM
7

The post is not about my son; if it were fiction, he'd be a "stock character," or a "foil." The post is about women. Did you not read that part, or did it go over your head?
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:45 PM
1

"her word choice implies that she does see promiscuity as morally "bad" behavior for women, however she said pretty explicitly that it is not morally bad for men to be promiscuous." No, I explicitly said neither. My intent was to see what readers would read into it. From the comments and discussions all around the internet, the responses have been mostly divided into two categories: "Yes, I have seen this behavior," and "You have no right to judge, because NAWALT" (with the sub-category: "Since …
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:58 AM
1

It's not that it is more morally "wrong" for women than for men, it's that it is more harmful to women who want to get married than for men who want to get married. Men don't want to marry slutty women, so the pool of prospects is already reduced. Add to that the fact that women in their late 20's and early 30's are starting to show their age (no longer the prettiest wives available) and prospects drop even further. "Reformed" sluts are also less likely to be able to commit to their marriages, o…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:06 AM
-2

Women have been valued for their wombs and men have been valued for their ability to provide, from the dawn of humanity until about fifty years ago. Do you suppose that was due to some master plan of social engineering, or might biology have actually played a big part in sex roles?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:24 PM
4

Awesome reading comprehension! His father did not write it. His mother did.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:21 PM
0

I don't encourage it, but I realize it may happen. He doesn't want to get married until around age 30, if at all. However he is attractive and women hit on him. Unless he WANTS to be celibate, he's probably going to have a few relationships and flings. My problem with women who do the same thing, is the difference between Sexual Marketplace Value and Marriage Marketplace Value. Women with lots of sexual experience have high SMV, but low MMV. Those who want to eventually marry, can't sleep around…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:16 PM
2

I'm older than GWW, but I want to be her when I grow up!
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:57 PM
1

Read more of my blog. No SoCon here.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:59 AM
6

Yes, I do wish it were untrue. My generation was bad enough in our youth, but dear God! What we have done, and continue to do to men and boys in this society, is absolutely disgusting! Women who don't behave like the women I described, are ENCOURAGED to - everywhere they turn. I have immense respect for girls who grow up in this feminized environment, and manage to turn their backs on everything they're told they can have and should have.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:34 AM
5

Thank you. That's my favorite compliment. ;)
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:56 AM
39

Admitting that men can love children means admitting that men are human. That's a can of worms nobody dares to open.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter