TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DropkickMorgan Archive

View 16 posts and 65 comments by DropkickMorgan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
761

DiscriminationDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:36 AM
372

OutrageDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:54 AM
353

Fathers/CustodyDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights21/06/15 08:11 PM
324

DiscriminationDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:14 PM
176

DropkickMorgan/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:49 PM
172

GeneralDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:04 PM
91

DiscriminationDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights25/09/15 08:29 AM
71

FeminismDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:27 PM
63

DropkickMorgan/r/PussyPass21/11/13 07:51 PM
58

DropkickMorgan/r/PussyPass07/04/14 11:16 PM
39

DropkickMorgan/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:13 PM
36

GeneralDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights29/05/15 08:21 AM
21

FeminismDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:52 PM
21

DropkickMorgan/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:44 AM
20

FeminismDropkickMorgan/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:52 PM
15

DropkickMorgan/r/PussyPass04/12/20 01:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

'In terms of comparable cases, I can't find any ... I don't want to make a guinea pig of her,' There are plenty of cases where teachers have sex with students and we know exactly how they end.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 12:35 PM
3

Do you think that some high profile men will begin to start avoiding relationships just to avoid the potential of this happening? https://www.sportbible.com/football/premier-league-players-sex-workers-nicklas-bendtner-126733-20221224
/r/MensRights23/03/23 01:38 PM
4

Internalised misandry
/r/MensRights15/02/22 01:00 AM
4

Me trying to find the sexist part of the joke
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/21 09:31 AM
1

I can't believe that someone with a child called Nevaeh would cheat. Shocked.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 05:31 PM
2

She hasn't been sentenced yet, but has been remanded into custody.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 11:55 AM
2

This is untrue. You can't vote on posts that are more than 6 months old because they have been archived.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 11:53 AM
7

Should criminals face consequences for their crimes?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:05 PM
1

#notallwomen
/r/MensRights09/10/18 10:25 AM
1

I don't understand why they need 'intimate samples', it does not matter what part of the body the DNA comes from, it's the same DNA. A cheek swap should have been fine. They're actually checking for the other person's DNA. Obviously makes the prosecution case a lot stronger if the complainant's DNA is on the defendant's penis.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:08 PM
19

Original interview with a Swedish site http://www.gp.se/nyheter/göteborg/bilen-stjäl-plats-från-kvinnorna-1.4187663
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:21 AM
13

I seriously doubt anything would have been done if a mother had checked in with her son. But then of course, only men are paedophiles. /s
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:45 AM
0

Took his kid on holiday during term time because it was cheaper. He's like one of those people who drive in the bus lane because the traffic is too busy.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:56 PM
42

People carry out FGM as a religious practice too. It's still banned.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:47 AM
0

Smash the matriarchy!
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:56 PM
2

While it isn't called rape, the female equivalent isn't simply sexual assault, and it also carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/causing-sexual-activity-without-consent/section/4
/r/MensRights09/04/16 09:01 PM
5

http://i.imgur.com/ZJrpNUu.png
/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:31 AM
3

This is victim blaming
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:07 PM
6

Double jeopardy means you can't be tried for the same offence twice. This however would be a different offence.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:13 PM
2

William Blackstone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone's_formulation
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:10 PM
2

The Matriarchy
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:41 AM
1

Didn't take long http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/officer-whose-jaw-was-broken-by-thug-at-public-event-sues-psni-for-failing-to-protect-her-31562676.html
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:40 PM
1

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/officer-whose-jaw-was-broken-by-thug-at-public-event-sues-psni-for-failing-to-protect-her-31562676.html
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:39 PM
5

She hasn't been sentenced yet
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:49 PM
1

stop being faceatious Facetious is when you treat something serious in a joking/non-serious manner. I think you meant to use a different word. He's just trying to use big words that he doesn't understand in an effort to seem more photosynthesis.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:26 PM
3

He didn't consent to her squeezing it, just tapping it. Consenting to a kiss doesn't mean you can have sex.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:06 AM
2

He agreed that she could tap it. She in fact squeezed it.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:05 AM
1

This is under the principle of 'joint enterprise'. If for example person A drives person B, to person's C house, in order to shoot them dead; person A will be charged with murder even though all they did was drive the car. Similarly a getaway driver will be charged with robbery.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:18 AM
1

#notallwomen
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:49 PM
1

That is already included under the offence of assault by penetration. Your definition would mean that putting your finger or a bit of food in someone's mouth would be considered rape. And it doesn't deal with women having penetrative sex with men without consent.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:56 PM
2

Totally serious. If a woman ties a man to a bed and then mounts him, she will be charged with the same offence that a man would face for touching someone's breast through their clothing, or rubbing their leg.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:37 PM
4

That's from England and Wales, with similar legislation in Scotland and the north of Ireland.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:21 PM
8

Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, rape is defined as follows: (1)A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents. Therefore, legally a woman cannot be guilty of the crime of rape. They would have to be charged with another offence, such as sexual assault.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 09:06 AM
7

http://i.imgur.com/OMbRcrK.gif
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:38 AM
3

Woman is sexist too http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/alex-salmond-rapped-sexism-after-5824445
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:14 AM
2

Should we also assume that drunk people who commit crimes don't have the necessary intent?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:17 PM
2

Presently, both men and women have to do the bleep test. They say that this equates to discrimination against women. As my title suggests.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 01:52 AM
2

Discrimination is discrimination.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:47 PM
3

I suppose Rosa Parks was being petty by refusing to sit at the back of the bus?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:19 PM
1

It shows under other discussions http://np.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/379cc1/so_sexist/
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:48 PM
8

I don't know. OP hasn't said. It still doesn't excuse it.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:06 PM
17

If there's such a large demand then they can use the port-o-lets and leave the men's toilet as it is. Instead, they've confiscated the men's toilet and kicked them outside like second class citizens.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:40 PM
66

Forgot to mention that this is a cross post from /r/pics. This was at a concert, and the men's toilets were changed to women's, while the men were forced to go outside.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:40 AM
3

equal sexism Oxymoron right there.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:42 PM
2

Not when they also had men in the advertisements.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:32 PM
5

The same thing happened here a fortnight ago, as per my last post http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34eeyz/newspaper_critiques_the_physical_appearance_of_5/
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:25 PM
34

This thing which treats men and women in exactly the same way is sexist!
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:54 PM
11

We should just teach women not to rape.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:28 PM
11

Mattress Girl raped me!
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:33 PM
8

For me, nothing illustrates that fact that "drunken consent is still consent" better than this girl, albeit this is not a sexual incident. The girl in this picture got herself into a state of intoxication where she agreed to something that she wouldn't have if she was sober. Using the Uber app, she physically had to agree to the 9x multiplier using her phone. She can't be charged 9x, unless she had consented to it. She was sober enough to consent, but drunk enough to forget about having consente…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:18 PM
2

Someone doesn't understand the meaning of mandatory.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 04:08 PM
1

then decided her drunk decisions don't count. http://np.reddit.com/r/rage/comments/2l2zw4/uber_stole_my_26th_birthday_girl_gets_hammered/
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:19 PM
2

What difference does it make if they're unmarried? Being married doesn't suddenly mean that the baby is definitely the husband's.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:05 PM
13

Should have said I'm in Belfast.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:16 PM
55

Are they also funding FGM?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:10 PM
0

No 2 is a man?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:54 PM
1

Under UK law, only men can commit rape. Here is the offence from the Sexual Offences Act 2003: A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:03 PM
1

And nobody will believe her. Unrapeable
/r/MensRights27/06/14 02:19 PM
1

Rape is a gender specific offence though. No woman could ever meet the definition.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:28 AM
1

As an accessory. It doesn't say she has been charged with aiding and abetting.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:16 AM
1

I've just given the definition. The person must have a penis
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:48 AM
1

I don't know how a woman has been charged with rape. Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 1 Rape (1) A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:53 PM
2

Real men hide their feelings. Why? Because it's none of your fucking business.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:05 PM
6

Nobody is forcing them to do it. Pro-choice when it suits them.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:09 PM
2

How long do you think a man would have been able to choke a woman like that?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter