TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DroppaMaPants Archive

View 1 posts and 241 comments by DroppaMaPants on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

DroppaMaPants/r/MensRights25/09/16 01:30 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

yay woo!
/r/MensRights13/01/20 02:51 AM
8

yah good luck proving who started it
/r/MensRights12/01/20 05:06 PM
1

" you better be interesting as fuck, look decent and not be a complete weirdo. " That leaves me out
/r/seduction22/12/19 01:19 PM
5

You started off with it's not true then ended with 'well technically she raped him'. Lol you idiot
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:22 AM
-1

neither of us are wrong
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:24 PM
2

No place for a razor company to piggyback that to make money. I'm with the mob on this one.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:58 AM
-3

Found the feminist shill
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:56 AM
1

It is a shame about the rank and file, but such is the cost of doing business. You put on the uniform you take the responsibility of the fallout of the actions of your retarded bosses.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:55 AM
2

That's rough
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:32 PM
29

I would host that show naked in the cold for 150 grand.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:30 PM
22

Happened to me at a bar once. Lucky for me I've been heavily abused as a child so that situation didn't bother me.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:24 PM
22

Hey maybe I'm looking for a neo Nazi chick!
/r/seduction10/12/18 12:04 AM
0

Not a bad idea. They are the ones who can least afford it, and just threaten then to triple the rates for an accident.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:29 AM
1

They were philosophy professor positions.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:42 PM
45

Austrians are actually that stupid, I've seen job postings from there than explicitly state they are only considering women.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 11:37 AM
1

Great - beliefs are worthless without objective proof. My kids believe in the Easter bunny because they found a basket of chocolate eggs in the morning. Good job. Bye.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:44 PM
1

You haven't made any arguments to address. All you've done is just babble about wives getting beat by their husbands and then laugh hysterically. An argument is something that goes like this - I believe in position A, because of reasons B, C, and D. You see, you need REASONS to have an argument. Without REASON, its just saying your opinion on a matter - which is different than an argument.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:59 PM
1

See - even your warped mind cannot understand the words in front of you! The dictionary could have simply read 'blablabla' and you would have interpreted it as it agreeing with you.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:21 PM
1

Well, you're wrong. For one, you kept misusing the word 'sophistry' - so when I gave you a link to a dictionary, all your eyes and brain could make of it was incomprehensible gibberish, because your ideology has blinded you to the ability to learn new things. You wouldn't know a fact if it was growing on your neck - neither would a mountain of objective truths that invalidates your world view change your mind.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:06 PM
2

Your problem is that there is nothing that will change your mind. I could provide you thousands of pages of evidence, but it's a waste of time. It's a problem of ideology, facts vs feels, you aren't sure what is one and what's another.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:54 AM
3

I don't think you know what sophistry means. There is no subtle deception going on - I'm just saying you are crazy. See - look, a dictionary, if you don't know what a word means, you can look it up. Here, I did the work for you: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sophistry In fact, I don't think you know what anything means, or even have the ability to understand A dictionary.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:33 AM
3

Well, yes, I am right, and you are a cultist. I cannot speak the truth to someone who cannot understand it. Your fake laughter (and other attempts at humor or in making light of the situation) is a defense mechanism against the brutal existential crisis you face. You are one the unfortunate wights of the post-enlightenment fallout. Spouting words you do not understand, citing references that have never existed, and the greatest folly of people like you is the inability to establish proper meanin…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:19 PM
9

It's so right it hurts. Your mind simply cannot fathom the truth because you are completely brainwashed. Watching your logic twist around the points like a snake is a perfect text-book example of how a cultist warps reality to suit their narrative.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:27 PM
2

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aXPSzdx2pgw/maxresdefault.jpg
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:22 PM
13

You are talking about something that has been abolished for nearly a hundred years (unless you count contemporary Muslim countries). Besides, you are speaking pure nonsense - being beaten was certainly a cause for divorce as far back as Christianity existed, I even remember hearing a divorce case in medieval Ireland where a woman divorced her husband for bad breath. Well, your arguments are just appeals to sentiment, not grounded in fact. Basically, you are saying if we disagree with you, we are…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:08 PM
2

For me its job hunting. After like 50 or so applications I just given up. Any advice for dealing with failure consistently?
/r/seduction24/02/18 09:22 PM
2

Ive been studying the history of Islam for over a decade and haven't come to my conclusion lightly.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:12 PM
2

Ok, enjoy your trip!
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:10 PM
1

Wtf
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:09 PM
24

You mean Islam is the real enemy of the world.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:13 PM
6

The fucking article is a good start!
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:43 PM
1

But they already hate you by yelling at you to stop 'mansplaining.'
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:29 AM
2

Exactly. They just couldn't call it quits, so they went full on crazy at the end of the 80s.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:58 PM
17

It's third wave now. Second wave was a brief Marxist movement in the 80s where they divided things up between the Masters and Slaves (guess who was seen as Master and who was Slave). Third wave is outright sexism vs men.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:30 PM
11

WTF is a "...member of an equity-seeking group." ?
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:19 PM
6

When I think of 'wifey' I think of that older porn star that mostly does oral.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 03:09 PM
11

Idiot.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 07:27 PM
16

A friend of mine in Canada lied on his application and said he was black - he got his interview almost 5 months before I was called.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 07:26 PM
3

I bet you are a real hoot at the Tupperware parties you take part of in hell!
/r/MensRights26/11/16 12:29 PM
2

I think its because it is so rainy there, and they reproduce when you pour water on them, or feed them after midnight.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 09:32 AM
28

idiotic
/r/MensRights30/07/16 12:12 PM
-17

OMG ... WOOOOoOOOoOOOWWWWW WOW. LEIK. WOW!!!! /s
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:25 AM
1

Of all the retarded things I've read - this one is the most retarded. That - and when someone complained about mayonnaise actually being a gender.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 07:43 PM
5

u cheap whore
/r/MensRights28/05/16 04:15 PM
4

Lots of us do. Now it's just buying time until the sweet release of death.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:39 AM
45

I'm a straight male in his 30 and would marry almost anyone for that much
/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:36 AM
1

She just doesnt realize how brainwashed and enslaved by patriarchy she is. /s
/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:30 AM
12

Can you make this more cluttered please?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:42 PM
13

equity = equal opportunity God damn SJWs and their warped minds.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:32 PM
1

Smells like your retardation.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:30 PM
3

she looks like a gigantic cunt
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:28 PM
2

I didn't know I just had to LOOK IT UP. Oops.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 09:34 PM
10

That's weird
/r/seduction10/08/15 08:03 PM
7

They are a Tupperware party from hell.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:23 AM
-1

Its an invite only site now.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:22 AM
1

Im asking because in North America it is so faux pas, any criticism of it is subdued harshly. Over here I lambasted it pretty hard with good reviews. But Im in southern Europe and not sure how it would be taken in France or Germany
/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:38 AM
4

Is this prevalent mostly in north America or is it ubiquitous across thw western world?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 12:33 PM
6

I read that as 'Islamic State' best time to get girls...
/r/seduction25/05/15 01:02 PM
18

8.5/100
/r/seduction18/05/15 11:45 AM
13

Thats what you learn in gender studies.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:58 AM
1

Libel cause its in print
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:02 PM
2

r/legitlegaladvice ?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:01 PM
11

A just question sire!
/r/seduction03/03/15 12:43 AM
1

Name me one person who has actually gone out and made a concerted effort to brings these points of view to light.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:35 PM
17

You are misquoting the law. It is this : The Canadian Human Rights Commission administers the Canadian Human Rights Act.[9] Section 3 of the Act prohibits discrimination based on "race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for which a pardon has been granted." Gender is most certainly listed, and if anyone tried speaking up saying women are over represented, would risk it being blown out of proportion …
/r/MensRights26/02/15 02:40 AM
12

http://www.lco-cdo.org/en/disabilities-principles-background-paper-sectionIV This principle has to be the most unprofessional and ridiculous statement ever written as law. It is nothing more than fluff meant to trigger good feelings in those in positions of authority and as a tool for obviously unqualified people to get a job. A quadriplegic 95 year old native Canadian applying to be a fireman? No problem, the law doesn't define me by what I can't do! The scary part is government's control over …
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:28 PM
25

You are correct, and since we have no free speech we cannot speak out against it without being charged for hate crimes.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:12 PM
2

Then we would have to take away their right to vote because they are not responsible enough, and the cycle continues.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:35 PM
1

Chi-congo?! No thanks!
/r/seduction31/01/15 04:20 AM
9

You are a terrible human being.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 03:23 PM
1

Im your height and the same thing happens to me a lot.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:45 AM
-1

Fuck you
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:43 AM
11

Well yes, but the same is true about men - people in general lie.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:17 AM
3

Yup. Though, my opinion, after the success of the Women's Lib. movement in the 1960s their efforts would be better directed at countries that legally look at women as chattel (Africa/Middle East).
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:18 PM
2

There are three kinds of feminism. Liberal (the old school Enlightenment - 'all are equal' type), Marxist (takes it a bit further - men = master, women = slave), then finally we have people like this, the Radical Feminist (who believe everything evil = men). So, when we speak of feminism we have to separate them into these categories.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:38 PM
2

After my grandmother died I have witnessed my grandfather drift from pain to depression to dementia - a sad thing to witness. Anyone without compassion for fellow persons is evil, and the person who wrote this thing certainly fits that definition.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:36 PM
0

I was reading Hegel the other day, and he associated warfare with the feminine - because in war they value bravery, strength, the emotions. So, I'll try calling the next chicken hawk a woman and see how that goes.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:05 AM
8

I love the ''Do some reading" arguments. Read what? Twilight? Astronomy? TELL ME PLEASE
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:03 AM
2

Hegel believes there is an "I" - but only after a long and difficult process can we get to that. Figuring out the "I" makes one a Wise Man - and is the pinnacle of philosophy.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:55 PM
4

Trouble is, feminists are cultists - and getting those kinds of people into positions of authority never ends well for the majority.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:55 AM
5

Lol feminism is the opposite of 'academic work'
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:15 AM
0

Needs anal
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:10 AM
0

Wat
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:08 AM
3

My favorite term in feminist literature is "phallocratic order."
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:43 PM
9

Packing them up and shipping them to Saudi Arabia is a great idea. They'll learn all about chauvinism there.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:41 PM
2

Of course, I was only speaking of general terms.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:40 AM
47

Restricting women to vote, hold property, etc. etc. would be a downside to the bad old days - but women always had empathy as a benefit. Now that the bad old days are behind us, women maintained their old privilege and now hold disproportionate sway over men because of it.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 11:28 PM
3

Terry O'Neill this lady? http://www.law.tulane.edu/tlsNews/newsItem.aspx?id=16028
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:47 PM
1

I'm pretty sure it goes like "a book was written" and "so and so wrote a book"
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:51 PM
0

No, did I do something wrong?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:46 AM
15

The most fucked up sexually perverse book I've read was wrote by a woman. "The shield of 3 lions" by Pamela Kaufman wrote in the 1960s A 12 year old girl (main character) is raped by a gay Richard the lion heart who thought she was a young boy. Then raped again by robin hood once she sprouted small breasts. Many more people in the book die of rape, including her best friend. Its a real rapeaganza of a novel!
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:17 AM
1

You just don't have the brains to understand what I'm saying, is what you mean.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:47 PM
1

I suppose ideology is working hardest when I am convinced it is not. Otoh we are creatures of meat and bone and I believe our mannerisms and tendencies are all outside our control.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:07 AM
3

Do you even understand what that sentence means? Nowhere does it rule out biology as the underlying reason why people are homosexual, but the biological reasons behind it are not clear. Nobody knows exactly what biologically speaking makes one homosexual - but the fact remains it is not a simple choice, like one would choose a style of clothes or whatever.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:40 AM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:03 AM
1

r/drawmohammad is a good starting place
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:58 PM
3

No, but one argument coming from the insane side of the argument would say people chose to be gay, like one would chose to be moral deviant. The truth is that they are born that way, it is not their fault or their choice.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:57 PM
2

Not a good plan. Unless you love hearing 'omg' over and over.
/r/seduction30/04/14 11:47 AM
-2

She seems like a nice lady.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:49 PM
4

I put on about 30lbs after my first kid. It took like 3 years and a lot of suffering to lose it.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:50 AM
1

It's true, I am more entertaining at dinner parties!
/r/MensRights20/02/14 03:40 AM
3

History undergrad here - I clean toilets and lift heavy things now.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:06 PM
1

Well, that does it. If it's in a textbook then it must be right.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:02 PM
1

You'd have to be pretty stupid to but a moral value on someone being disabled, like the blind have no soul or the deaf are wicked people. I can understand that criticism. I do not understand the criticism of how it is an error to say a disability makes one less competent, physically, like how the idea that someone with no hands would be less competent to knit a blanket than someone who has normally functioning hands.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:39 PM
1

Oh, like saying someone missing a few limbs is less of a human being?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:09 PM
1

Wikipedia gives a definition of it like this: ''A disability is thus, inherently, a "bad" thing that must be overcome. The ableist worldview holds that disability is an error, a mistake, or a failing, rather than a simple consequence of human diversity, akin to race, ethnicity, sexual orientation or gender.[3] I see nothing wrong with this. A person who lost their legs in war, for example, is quite easy to say their position is worse off than when they had legs. The use of our limbs and senses i…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:41 PM
1

Holy shit, I'm in the military and can have a field day with this. What do you mean I'm too out of shape to be in? Ableism!!! What do you mean my math scores are too low to be transferred to this trade?! Ableism!!! I'm going to the press, this institution is bigoted!! How dare you judge me on my ability to do a job, what about my ability to overcome obstacles?!
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:30 PM
2

Yah, true. I just give them the benefit of the doubt and think they were brainwashed. I wouldn't go outright and hate someone for being brainwashed, instead I'd feel bad for them and try to show them the error of their ways.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:27 PM
11

Ive never even heard of half of them. WTf is ableism?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:55 PM
42

Like saying you cant be racist against white people, or bigoted towards Christians.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:54 PM
4

No no, the grammar clowns come out to protect the participants in case the grammar becomes too wild.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:57 AM
14

Cunt Edit. Jk lolerskates lmaonaise
/r/seduction28/01/14 12:12 AM
14

I think of feminism as a cult - closed off from outside criticism and dogmatic.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:03 PM
1

I knew my kind wasn't welcome here!
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:35 PM
1

I'm seeing a lot of Uruguayans here lately. You guys stalking me while I'm here?!
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:42 PM
2

Is this kinda like how bars have ladies night not guys night?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:11 PM
1

It was a dark and stormy night. I fucked your mom. It was marginal, at best. I left after finishing. The end.
/r/seduction01/12/13 04:41 PM
3

You shouldn't judge people with the same stick. Person A will be better at X, person Y better at B, etc. You're not together so something went wrong. Look at this like you are investigating a plane crash. Try to focus on the causes of the crash rather than lamenting how beautiful the plane looked before. The thing went down in flames for a reason. Kelly, in this case, chose to drive that thing into the ground. She never respected Kyle in the first place. You saw a unicorn, but you know in your h…
/r/seduction01/12/13 04:39 PM
1

Kyle was seduced and made vulnerable because he thought he became invulnerable, this happens all the time in business when people make a huge blunder and go bankrupt after a long history of winning.
/r/seduction01/12/13 04:15 PM
0

I just forwarded this to 2 friends who were recently divorced. Their wives left them and suffered quite a bit.
/r/seduction01/12/13 04:13 PM
1

Well done. The same can be said for anyother external source of internal validation (work status a la 'about Schmidt')
/r/seduction01/12/13 04:12 PM
2

Hey, now that you mention it, they are kinda like bees.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 02:49 AM
3

Hooray !
/r/MensRights24/11/13 02:45 AM
28

Ship them to Saudi Arabia. They can enjoy fighting the good fight there.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 02:43 AM
7

'Boys have a penis and girls have a vagina'
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:15 PM
3

Similar cases exist in the military. They push out out of shape females and reject many male minorities.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:14 PM
1

I would prefer not to, but I guess if there are no other volunteers...
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:15 AM
0

Something something privileged!!!! edit. she needs anal.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 12:30 PM
10

Absolutely. Familiarity breeds complacency and that can kill relationships just as easily as when driving a car or handling dynamite.
/r/seduction15/10/13 11:19 AM
3

I met my wife when I was young. Not a problem. The point is not to sew wild oats, but to live life to its fullest.
/r/seduction15/10/13 07:23 AM
11

That is why im staying off hardcore drugs for now
/r/seduction15/10/13 07:19 AM
13

im a married guy too, but im finding a lot of good self help and inspirational messages, plus 'seduction' does not necessarily mean sexual, it could be helping interpersonal relations.
/r/seduction15/10/13 07:18 AM
-2

pls
/r/seduction15/10/13 07:14 AM
1

Wonderful read, thank you for this.
/r/seduction15/10/13 07:14 AM
5

Razpeckt.
/r/seduction27/09/13 05:59 PM
1

I dunno - you could give them fleshlights that spew fire or something.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 09:41 PM
3

Thank God this insanity is not mainstream here. But I do not think this kind of feminism is useless - they could be useful. Say - we put them all on a plane and air drop them into Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan. That kinda of radical militant feminism is just the thing to combat radical militant Islam!
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:27 PM
2

Meeting people is a numbers game as much as anything - keep it up and let that confidence shine through and you'll do fine!
/r/seduction22/08/13 03:50 PM
10

If marriage is a business relationship - how come it is not treated like one when that relationship ends? If I quit, I'm not entitled to severance - but in the case of divorce the woman can cheat and leave and still get half of everything. It's not fair.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:17 PM
1

It's a bit funny, but watch the movie "Hell Comes to Frogtown" - a great B movie from the 80s or early 90s exploring what happens when everyone becomes sterile except for a select few.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:58 AM
1

Woo hoo! We've reached agreement! I think my analogy with the atmosphere was can be confusing, I'll think of these things as a percentage out of 100 like how you used from now on. Still, even if we weren't exactly clear in the beginning it was a nice mental exercise to clarify our ideas.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:54 AM
1

Ah okay I see what you're saying. What we're disagreeing about is the importance of nature and social actions. You're saying you can't have one without the other - which is fine. I agree. What I'm saying is how we define social action versus natural ones. Of course, we are material beings and our interaction with the material plane is and so is reliant on nature to DO what we do. All I'm saying, is that some of the things we do are so detached from our natural state of being that the only reason…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 01:22 AM
1

"Why is it unimportant to examine the causes of something?" Examination is okay - as long as you don't dwell on it and move onward to the subject at hand. What you're doing is like the history professor that wasted his entire semester talking about the lead up to his course that he never actually got into the material he was supposed to teach. Here, noting that some of our action may have had, way down the line, a link with our nature is not relevant. I suppose guys like you are only concerned w…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:10 AM
1

But what I'm getting at is there are social activities we do on a daily basis, without even thinking about it - which are so outside the biological imperative that any connection to biology they may have had leading up to them is unimportant. Because we can detect some bit of oxygen 100,000 feet in the air doesn't mean we're still in the troposphere at that altitude. Because we can detect some minor hint at a biological need in something doesn't mean that biology is the force behind the action. …
/r/MensRights08/07/13 10:09 AM
1

Good question. I would argue that since everybody has both biology and culture it shouldn't cloud the issue - in fact it should clear it. The argument that I am going against is that we are just slaves to biology and psychology - that we have a set of social rules and actions that separate us from our biology. Such actions like declaring absence from sex for religious reasons, or becoming a vegan or the like do not serve us biologically but only fit into the role of our culture and society. My t…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:24 AM
1

But let me follow this logic further. If all human action is derived from our biology and psychology - so must economics. If the Chinese straw hat is the most economical design considering materials and technique, then, that hat must have been the only possible design human beings could have come up with. That hat is a physical embodiment of the objective. Somebody somewhere sat down, weaved some grass together and made that design, and from there everyone around them followed suit. It was not a…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:11 AM
1

Are you suggesting that Chinese styled straw hats are biologically presupposed to be that way?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:17 AM
1

But this does nothing to explain why we change what is en vogue in a society. By saying that we just want change does nothing to explain the nuances behind the change. You are just making the connection between the lower strata and higher. As I said, the higher stratas are all dependent on the lower, but each are autonomous. Boredom does not explain why certain straw hats are styled like this in China http://cn1.kaboodle.com/hi/img/b/0/0/51/4/AAAAC2GqCCwAAAAAAFFJYA.jpg?v=1244219058000 and look l…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:33 PM
1

So, those 78 genes in the Y can express itself very profoundly. You cannot rule out it's importance then. Because it just doesn't contain the number the X does, does not mean it is any less important.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:45 PM
1

Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, I'm now totally confused! I get the importance of producing healthy babies, I don't get how the value aspect of who does what and what is either valuable or valueless. I just see both being equally valuable. Oh well.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:42 PM
1

Or why bell bottoms are no longer in fashion, or why is disco dead, or why there is a craze on wizards, werewolves, or sci-fi booms.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:30 PM
1

No no, plenty of things are purely social. Like, waiting to eat before everyone sits down, or turning off the cell phone before a movie starts, or the rules of the road (why not red means stop and green go?), or how patting the head in one culture is seen as a sign on endearment and in another is a sign of deep disrespect.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:03 PM
1

Thanks! I had a walk and thought about it a little. Would it be fair to say that in our society, one who produces would be masculine - "the bread winner" being a classic term given to the male of the household. Women give birth and make sure the species continues on, but men provide the extra little bit that ensures women get pregnant in the first place. Without men, there would have been no continuance of the species either. That's just how we are, if we were capable of self reproduction then o…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:14 PM
1

Yes, but somewhere down the line we can we draw the separation between social constructs and our nature. I do not see this line as clear cut, more like it is a hazy transition between one and the other. If we can look at the differentiation between our nature, social constructs, and our being, it would be like the layers of atmosphere of the earth. The earth - the center, would be our being, next closest to us our nature, then the up the way to societal constructs. The further from being we get,…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:03 PM
1

Yes. That's exactly what I meant. Good for you. I was suggesting men only went out and speared elephants all day every day. Excellent observation 10/10.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:46 PM
1

Ugh - you don't know many pregnant women do you? My wife worked right up until a week before she gave birth, same with many other women I know. In fact, that women stop working just because they got pregnant is not what I've seen at all. I'm also in the military and women there work right up until 30 days before the due date, then after that just do paperwork. Now, the types of work they can do while pregnant is down to pure physics and muscle. When my wife was 8 or 9 months pregnant driving a c…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:23 PM
0

Thank you for the quick reply - I find your ideas of putting values and genders together is interesting and requires more review before I can fully understand it. I have to go out for a few hours now but when I get back I'll dissect it and read what you have on /masculism.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:19 PM
1

I think perhaps he is like those early modern scientists who saw how cultures in the Caribbean were in the 17th and 18th century - that the men would lay around and the women did all the work, then came to the conclusion that ALL men throughout history were nothing but sperm donors and women were the real spine of humanity.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:14 PM
0

Still - we share about 98-99% of our genes with chimpanzees. And you would agree that the small difference we have certainly makes a huge difference in reality!
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:07 PM
1

I doubt a woman caring for a newborn and a couple of toddlers had the time and energy to leave their kids in the hut and go out for a few days to toss a spear into a mammoth.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:05 PM
1

I don't understand your logic.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:04 PM
2

I spent a little time in Bucharest - ugh, well, from what I've seen there they are generally on par with Western Europe, but still at the heart is Eastern European. So - in my brief observation, I explain this facade of acceptance and soul of intolerance as a sort of east and west mixture. I'm sorry it's not that well explained.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:03 PM
1

Sounds like your history, civics, and geography teachers were idiots - or at least not understanding the whole picture.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:59 PM
3

Thank you for this - but I was wondering, what would you consider to be a good model for the gender system? Myself, without much thought, would assume masculinity and femininity are simply a social construct. Our human emotions and characteristics, like passion, empathy, etc. are a part of our nature, not our gender. Still, I'd be curious what you or others may think.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:57 PM
1

I completely agree with all the quotes I've read from her so far. That being said, I have no clue what her larger philosophy is on sexuality, I'm just reading her critique on feminism, the powerlessness of men (sexually) in society and of her philosophy in general.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:42 PM
6

I think feminism has the lowest opinion of women possible - they thrive on the idea that they are the lowest pile of crap and are disdained by everyone - themselves included. They have cute names, like 'phallocratic order' and the like.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:28 PM
7

I would say this is discriminatory - but against men not women.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:19 PM
3

It says it better here than I can say it. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/multiculturalism/citizenship.asp
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:43 PM
6

As a Canadian I am not surprised it happened here. This is the only country that has multiculturalism mandated by law. Can you imagine what this means?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:49 AM
3

Her name is literally Miss Informed.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:01 PM
1

Please dump her, not all women are bitches like her
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:03 AM
1

My favorite term is "Phallocratic Order."
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:04 AM
2

Why is she smirking like that?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:58 AM
2

Because that's a personal choice, not one thrown on her due to ideology. I have nothing against a woman who thinks her beauty is so outrageous she's afraid of being objectified and then covers up. The ideology that thinks men are horny animals that cannot contain themselves if they see hair is offensive, backwards, and barbaric.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 10:29 PM
3

I don't think it's noble - it's retarded. It's implying we are not taking her for being a person in the first place and she needs the scarf to remind us of that.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 09:00 PM
1

Or calling something 'fascist' - that's an auto-win.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:01 PM
0

Where does she get these insane ideas?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:59 PM
1

Those particular women's signs say absolutely the most mind numbingly stupid things. That being said the std chick was hot.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:51 PM
12

I had a history proff who was a hardcore feminist - passing that course was painful.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:01 PM
2

You're right - he probably should have planned to bail long before instead of relying on a system hell bent against him.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 02:22 AM
2

I would agree that those who avoid criminal acts only because they do not want to face punishment are undeveloped. I looked up the bankruptcy laws and yes he is indeed fucked for life. Not even that can absolve him. If it were me, I'd just get on a plane and start a new life somewhere never to see them again.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 02:09 AM
1

That's because the people over there are willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:41 AM
4

may as well, you have everything else taken away from you.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:06 AM
0

Looks like it said it was done by the SRS Senior Manager.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 10:34 AM
4

Ugh - yeah. Most HR departments are filled with psychos. usually of the cruelest creature on the planet today - post menopausal white women!
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:14 AM
3

I've figured out what viperz's hates and have come to the conclusion that no one should acknowledge or reply to their posts - simply downvote and move on. Here's what I gathered on viperz: She/he/it loathes men. And traditionally male dominated institutions like the Catholic Church. It then projects this hatred of the Church so that they get the attention they seek from /atheism - a well known place where the willfully ignorant are there in droves to eat up anything attacking the Church. Also - …
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:50 PM
4

SRS seems to be some sort of circlejerk fractal.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 01:14 AM
13

Was SRS always a militant feminist safehouse? it seems to have always been that way, but I'm wondering if it ever was a place where people just posted funny comments other people said.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:10 PM
3

She has to resort to dating sites for a reason.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 01:37 AM
1

nah i'm a white male in late 20s - pretty much the boring standard norm here.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:32 PM
1

yeesh!
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:53 PM
2

I see her more of a immature little girl rather than a woman - though the law would disagree with me.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:25 PM
1

http://taylorbigler.com/?page_id=2 I think her quest for GAM is just not in the cards. The comments section there is hilarious - its all spam for electric scooters and crap for people with hearing problems.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:23 PM
2

I like to think of SRS as a Tupperware party from hell.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:18 PM
1

Wow. The person who did that is a pretty pathetic individual. I feel bad she spent so much time on something so stupid.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:18 PM
3

I thought everyone of SRS and Manboobz were trolls.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:33 PM
1

Yellow journalism at it's finest.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:31 PM
0

remotely sane. I wrote it right there.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:29 PM
-6

Anti-intellectuals like luciansolaris certainly do a number on progress.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:48 AM
4

Oh yes, I avoid SRS. Anyone who posts anything remotely sane there gets a nice condescending label next to their name then downvoted to oblivion. I cannot psychoanalyze the motives of the people there - I'm not sure why they are so irrational and hate filled - but they are.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:46 AM
3

I did my part. Hopefully you'll get there then not have to stink up this place.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:42 AM
5

wat
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:32 PM
1

You cannot speak the language with reason with someone who only speaks crazy.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:32 PM
2

only little girls and stupid people have this mentality.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 02:44 PM
2

I was educated by the great Tom Leykis. He taught me everything I needed to know on the subject of men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 12:05 PM
11

If some drunk guy is dumb enough to buy girls drinks, then that's his loss. I had to learn this lesson the hard way though.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 03:03 AM
1

let me translate your post: "some society that went extinct 1500 years ago were not equal towards women! therefore we are under the yoke of woman hating monsters! bluaahhh!"
/r/MensRights18/12/11 09:29 PM
13

Looks like a real law to me - why do you think it's propaganda?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 05:36 PM
8

I got similar treatment on /shitredditsays and left after I was labeled a shithead or something like that for asking what was so offensive about a rather benign remark. I don't think that sort of behavior is acceptable. Downvoting or rebuttal is acceptable though, in my opinion. With yourself - I feel you are wrong in your opinion that if men have unprotected sex with a woman, then they are forced to stay married or marry the woman they impregnated.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 04:44 PM
4

I don't think you're a troll - so whoever put that there next to your name is being stupid. You're just wrong. The choice to have a baby is an equal matter.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 04:20 PM
11

You're insane.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 04:10 PM
2

I just ask for some oral now and again. Is that so WRONG?!
/r/MensRights01/12/11 11:40 PM
2

Women are free to allow to flash their stashes as well.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 11:42 AM
2

i thought women came from adam's rib? and it looks like men evolved more than women... still wtf am i doing this whole thing is retarded
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:56 PM
2

It reads like it was written by a feminist on meth, but the author's name in Conor - is that a female name?
/r/MensRights05/10/11 07:59 PM
8

I'm now convinced gay people should run the world.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 12:44 AM
5

excellent point.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 12:02 AM
1

Indeed, Canada is just as bad as the US, but doctors up the language slightly better.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 06:00 PM
1

I know there is no way I'm getting that job when I answer those questions. I guess I could say I'm a minority because most of the people in the world are not white.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 05:59 PM
3

Curiosity here - but was it the punch or the fall and smack to the head that caused the guy to die?
/r/MensRights19/09/11 10:40 PM
5

hey, look, a crazy person on the internet!
/r/MensRights18/09/11 06:33 PM
18

Your friend doesn't happen to be 13 and just broke up with her bf by any chance?
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:04 AM
4

dee needs anal
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:03 AM
2

Communism also sounds great in the dictionary, but in practice has shown itself not fitting with human nature. The same goes with feminism in western society - it may have had a purpose 80 years ago, but no so today. Where we see injustices in the world I believe feminism to be a lesser mode of establishing equality and human rights over egalitarianism because it (egalitarianism) looks at the overall societial problem rather than simply making women out to be poor sheep and men violent oppressor…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 12:11 AM
5

You cannot argue from a poin of rationality with irrational people. Enlightened people like the OP cannot convince those who still adhere to feminism and have knowledge of these facts at the same time.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 04:53 PM
0

fecesbook?
/r/MensRights05/09/11 02:07 PM
3

Because these women are about as mature as 13 year old school girls.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 02:06 PM
3

I'd be interested in joining - I live about an hour from TO so it shouldn't be a problem to join.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 11:15 PM
4

I was thinking of getting into the financial planning business last year, and after doing the course on insurance it turned me off the whole thing. The entire game is meant for them to win. I can't believe it's legal - for me it certainly isn't moral. Unfortunately it is necessary.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 08:20 PM
2

I certainly would disagree. There are many factors when considering a woman other than just looks, especially when it comes to long term relationships.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 07:12 PM
0

Simply because they are hypocrites.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 08:44 PM
1

I see nothing there against women, just stupidity and vapidity.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:49 PM
0

Mr. Bardamu - you are a wonderful man.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:47 PM
16

I don't understand how a rational person could see this as anything other thhan forcing someone to admit guilt for the chance of getting out early.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 11:50 PM
2

Well that's no basis for a relationship.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 03:04 PM
4

AAAHHH!!!!!
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:59 PM
7

that's because he's 4000 years old and doesn't care anymore
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:58 PM
2

ogre god looks pretty bad ass http://photos.froggytest.com/d/59402-2/Ogregod+tome+1.jpg
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:28 PM
2

wat
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:18 PM
1

I've had plenty of female bosses throughout my life - probably more females than males. Most were okay - but the really bad ones were those who were just plain stupid people.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:17 PM
2

And by destroying these myths we can step further towards true equality.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter