TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DrunKeMergingWhetnun Archive

View 1 posts and 147 comments by DrunKeMergingWhetnun on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

FeminismDrunKeMergingWhetnun/r/MensRights18/08/23 10:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Back in my day, we called this "benevolent sexism," and it was bad. But thanks to denial living in age where we're trying to equate having a vagina with having paraplegia, it's a good thing! Equity for everyone! Except the bad people because they're bad, and if you say otherwise, you're the bad. Also, what's collective narcissism?
/r/MensRights31/08/23 01:03 AM
9

Just as the internet suffers from Reductio ad Hitlerum, feminists suffers from Reductio ad Misogynum. With enough mental backflips, everything is misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 05:23 AM
3

And it's still practiced around the world, but on different populations of males. For the same crimes, women still get the old slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 10:19 PM
2

Depends what you mean by "real." They're social constructions, ideas that exist only insofar as the concept is passed around and influences people's thoughts and actions merely because people agree they're "real." They're no different from race, marriage, the friendzone, and Freddy Kruger. As ideas, they're no different to words themselves, assuming someone has correctly informed you that, yes, all words are made up. Ever heard of a "snollygoster"? What would you do if I "groaked" at you? Take r…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 04:51 AM
8

Good luck. Don't expect your academics to drive your success or forget to brown nose your professors for letters of recommendation. My academic advisor failed to mention not only how important they are but how many I'd need to get into an accredited program. I tried going the job experience route, and long story short, I gave up seeking my PhD for the persistent attitude "male=predator" of people who were supposed to be my colleagues. Regardless, program expectations are beyond moronic for how f…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 08:49 AM
1

True, but doesn't rebut my point. You outlined that these sentiments grew in popularity rather than that feminism grew in anti-male fervor. And, sure, they make new tomes of choreography for their mental gymnastics everyday, but when the core tenet remains "man bad," alternative forms like "death to men" (that can still be found in rhetoric from the 60s) are little more than symbolic gilding on the lily to virtue signal to others within the bowel movement.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 11:45 PM
3

Even a stopped watch is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 11:27 PM
3

That's what I get for slapping my keyboard without proofreading. Yet thanks to descriptivism, since you still understood what I meanted, Saul Goodman.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 11:26 PM
1

Good outside 2 points: feminism hasn't grown in anti-male sentiment, remaining pretty consistent since the start of second wave. And both the left and right have alt, i.e. extremist, extensions. For example, Femen on the left, KKK on the right.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:53 AM
37

*TL;DR The beatings will continue until moral improves
/r/MensRights26/08/23 02:33 AM
16

Pointed this out a couple days ago on another post. It gets even more hilarious when you go down the rabbit hole clicking through various links to related terms. You could turn spotting all the gynocentric, self-serving language into a drinking game, if you like alcohol poisoning. Reeks of "no, taking attention not so much off women as it is merely including men's experiences is sexist because man bad" "progressivism." The wiki on chauvinism is especially comical for the difference between the m…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:29 AM
4

The loneliness epidemic is bad enough as it is. We don't need someone like Walsh making it worse.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:45 PM
3

Same, though it's not completely your fault when many would rather wallow in filth than exert the modicum of energy needed to stand up. Also doesn't help when those same people would rather bite your hand than the one keeping them down. Now that's the situation that confuses the fuck out of me.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 04:28 AM
21

Yuuuuuuuuup. Finally got a reply on why my post was removed. Evidently, that sub is a place for only "simple" legal questions, and "doesn't it sound like I have a case" after providing context is too complex for the single profession that places its own competence above all other discourses. I didn't bother asking what constitutes a "simple" legal question, but from the continued correspondence from the mod, I can only assume it's questions that can be answered with 10 minutes of googling. Edit:…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 04:17 AM
50

You could try r/legaladvice. But given I'm currently getting push back and risking a ban because "should I seek further legal advice" then providing context for medical abuse I experienced when I was 6 is deemed an "unanswerable question" before deletion, I wouldn't expect much.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:10 AM
4

very pro-motherhood Yeah, that one scene in the literal beginning when the young girls smashed their baby dolls really helped to sell the pro-motherhood themes.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 10:58 AM
3

\appearing right*
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/23 08:21 AM
5

Let us know when you realize the inherent issue with intersectional thought, specifically that looking at the intersection of 2 or any arbitrarily limited number of factors will always result in error prone and even antihumanistic conclusions, as no person is reducible to black and male, hispanic and gay, or what have you. When you arrive at the correct conclusion and consider all intersections simultaneously, you'll notice we have two terms for that called "psychology" and "sociology," thus ren…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/23 08:19 AM
3

Yep, but remember, the system is biased towards men. Just take my experiences as example - I was once a step down from therapist at an at risk youth facility, had my reputation destroyed, and nearly ended up on an abuse list after being accused of smiling at one of my young female clients with sexualized behaviors. It wasn't until after I gave up expecting reality to win out and resigned that someone (who had her own issues with the facility and quit on the spot 2 days later) finally talked to m…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 05:00 AM
1

Beat me to it. Gotta love it too when you're dealing with the type of liberals who believe just because fascism is historically associated with the right, it's magically unique solely to the right because a book said so. Self-serving bias at its finest. Wait. What am I saying? Clearly you're homophobic if you're straight and not willing to fuck another dude. Or transphobic for reasons that somehow defy logic even more.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:44 AM
-1

Apart form an air of needing to be in the spotlight of a movie, I didn't see anything in there anywhere near what Larson and Zegler have said. And looking at the movies she's been in, seems like she's much closer to someone like Emily Blunt. Post something more damning if ya got it.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:28 AM
2

Which is hilarious when you visit the page for misandry, scroll down to the "criticisms" section, and below it are links to the wikis on female chauvinism and gynocenterism. Those pages also have their own "criticisms" sections that fit the textbook definition of irony, especially this one: "Christina Hoff Sommers has argued that gynocentrism is anti-intellectual and holds an antagonistic view of traditional scientific and creative disciplines, dismissing many important discoveries and artistic …
/r/MensRights20/08/23 11:11 PM
10

Miss the obvious free center of that bingo card: "misandry doesn't exist"
/r/MensRights20/08/23 12:15 AM
7

can't tell. There ya go. But when it comes to denial, there's no real difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/23 02:42 AM
13

Beat me to it. Though to add, it's not just that they're women - it's also that, because women who've been dead for decades to millennia experienced hardship, men of today must pay a kind of reparations for the actions of men who've been dead for the same time frame. It's feminism's version of original sin, the old "the sins of the father are the sins of the son." You'd think that after we correctly ruled a father's debts can't be forced on to their kids as they had nothing to do with it, we'd u…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 12:47 AM
10

reddit, supposidly the most liberal/feminist hellscape to exist Only if you've never heard of Facebook, Tumblr, and what the fuck we're calling Twitter now, which is especially hilarious as I keep hearing how it's a pipeline to the alt right.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:28 PM
24

Textbook denial coupled with the fact that a rather surprising number of woman can't tell when they're sexually aroused, especially related to visual stimuli. Goes back to the original Kinsey studies. I forget the ratio, but I recall it being around 1/3 of women can't tell.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/23 11:21 PM
1

Translation
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:07 PM
2

there was a patriarchy Lol this is like watching an athlete walk right up to the goal line, ball in hand, then just chuck it at the ref. Again, as patriarchy is defined as a system that oppresses women while benefiting only men, these changes in society that benefit women would never have been allowed to happen at all if such a system was the dominate perspective the moment men voted to change it. If we go back to medieval Europe, you'd have a better point, though most of the same oppression wou…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 10:25 PM
1

Heading towards? Unless you're around other men who aren't one of the many, many forms of shit from Tate to "what gender do I feel like today" Mulvaney, you can't talk about your experiences without being mocked, harassed, and silenced because someone somewhere somehow has it worse than you, which then doesn't apply to feminists such as when looking at western women vs eastern. I can't remember the last time it was common for acid to be thrown on an unfaithful wife or one had their clit ritualis…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:26 PM
4

Barrier to entry. Far easier to take your top off than pick up a hammer.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:50 PM
4

Pretty much. Essentially, it's the same old cliche of woman equating relationships with oppression because laundry, cleaning, and other domestics. Ya know, things you're supposed to do, relationship or not. It's especially hilarious when they quote the old "women spend an hour more on chores than men." Yeah, per week, which comes out to less than 10 a day. The only element that they have ground on is child care, and that comes with a lot of caveats, the least of which is the "dad is a babysitter…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:05 AM
6

Forgot to add "And they all had a mother."
/r/MensRights14/08/23 07:02 PM
251

The more shit like this gets passed around, the more it sounds like an Onion article. "Woman becomes man, says new ability to walk alone at night completely offsets new persistent social isolation and treatment as schrodinger's rapist. Looks forward to finding out if suicide will be counted under male or trans statistics."
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:58 PM
2

To each their own. Many are the wood, few are the chipper.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:29 AM
3

Feminists also fail to accept accountability for women's contributions to their own situations. Such as with STEM fields, rather than accept it's not that women don't want to go into STEM or accept women aren't being actively kept out, when given free choice (as is seen time and time again in egalitarian societies) women independently chose fields that align with stereotypic elements like care fields and other person-oriented professions. Stated differently, women given free choice commonly choo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/23 07:34 AM
13

No. The system of control they talk about is economic in nature. But since the current vogue rejects class reductionism, as accepting it means women (also applies to minorities) at the top can be held responsible for continuing or making new abuses, self-ascribed feminists cling to their jargon as a means to virtue signal to like-minded people. Same with all "us vs them" social movements and groups that behave like religions.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 07:07 AM
25

No "/s" needed on true statements. Same goes for misogyny. Went from "the categorical distrust, disparagement, and hatred of women" to "if it upsets even a single woman, it's misogynistic."
/r/MensRights16/07/23 06:59 AM
5

Gotta love the gaslighting of "violent means." Oh, you mean that while men also use every known method women do, men are more likely than women to pick instant, certain methods that leave no room for either someone to discover what's actually a cry for help or for the person to back out last second? Yeah, fuck the dead /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/23 05:08 AM
4

No improvements? The original comment listed many of the advancements made in female contraceptives since the days of the pill when the bar for viable pharmaceuticals was significantly lower than it is now. That's why the one male pill didn't make it past clinicals despite being effective, though misandrists still made fun of the increased risk and instances of suicide. If we had to do everything all over, even the original pill wouldn't make it to market. If you're looking for a magic bullet wi…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 11:12 PM
9

Are you trying to be racist, sexist, classist, and ethnocentric? If not, may want to adjust your thought process.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 10:06 PM
4

That's the thing though. There's a reason Daryl Davis has managed to deprogram so many white supremacists, enough to make modern psychologists look like a joke, and it isn't done using avoidance. I get where you're coming from, and if you and others don't think you have the balanced mindset to deal with such toxic people, not engaging with them is your best option as well as best helps support those who can address these people by not causing additional issues. Any negative interaction will inhe…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 09:59 PM
1

I've had similar shocks in both directions, and it's always bizarre to hear people claim they've never seen such a thing. Makes me suspect their motives towards what in psychology is called sublimation. Anyway, it's still debated whether the apparent "early" onset of menarche/spermarche is actually a recent phenomenon or just an illusion due to poor record keeping since its primary dictating factors are nutrition and stress. We tend to assume earlier eras where inherently more destitute than now…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 08:27 AM
20

Explain what, that shitty mothers exist because merely birthing someone doesn't imply a "magical connection only mothers understand"? I don't mean to sound dismissive, but does that really need further detailing or have you never heard of neglect, physical abuse, using kids as emotional pawns, sexual abuse, exploitation, and murder to name just a few? My last case, I dealt with a guy who's now well into adulthood. As of when I left the field, he was still in deeeeeeeeeeeep denial of how his moth…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 06:37 AM
38

Yeah, but you assume all such women care for their kids. Previously having been a therapist, I'll put this as thoroughly as possible: NOPE!
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:32 AM
15

Loooooooooooooong story that goes back to the beginning of reddit itself. The basic, very stripped down run down is that early r/athiesm became "super misogynistic" because of how much people fronted people like Dawkins and Sagan rather than female figures, then Dawkins said some things that coincide with evolutionary psychology, which feminist REALLY hate. Insert some of the stupidity also seen with gamergate thanks to a few retards on our side (granted spoof accounts/people posing as men can't…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:23 AM
126

"So men, if you really are #WithUs Sorry, Ma'am. But I don't negotiate with fascists.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:04 AM
25

Now post this in r/relationship_advice with a made up story similar to Jonah Hill's to see what happens. I can only imagine the downvotes and accusations of sexism/misogyny.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:27 AM
51

Yep. After all, women are free to make their own choices..........so long as they're not the ones the Sisterhood of the Traveling Goalpost deems unfit. Almost like the feminist lauded movie Mean Girls was a documentary in the same vein as Idiocracy, not that any of them grasped that point.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:11 AM
1

Hmmm. Your deflection is starting to make me think you're an unserious internet creeper with ulterior motives. All I need is your name and alma mater in a DM, and I can vet your history from there. You can trust me. Sadly, this information is rather sensitive and has lead to experts and researchers being stalked, harassed, threatened, and worse. It'd be a great shame for someone genuinely seeking to understand the human condition to experience such misfortune.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:04 AM
66

Not just shame and disregard, they outright blame us for their own contributions to our struggles. Ya see, since random guy B, who's totally real and not an imaginary boogieman - like totally, absolutely, and definitely, really certainly real - did something mean to her, it's your fault that she's breaking you down psychologically and crushing your spirit. Because something something patriarchy something something yes all men.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 08:39 AM
-1

Pretty pathetic. Had to ditch a number of people I followed over this,. I mean seriously - people bitching about the whole surfer and pictures thing are so dense they're unaware of what a wet suit is. One of the only people who got it right showed a "therapist" from tiktok who commented about how Jonah was using therapy speak to manipulate the situation, and I'm thinking about filing a complaint with the APA over his accusations and statements on people not under his care. For those who don't kn…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:47 AM
1

Post your psych credentials, and once I confirm your qualifications, I'll look for what I have.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:29 AM
4

What do you mean? There was that like week and a half of people talking about "dad bod" when David Harbour did a thing right before they all went right back to all the same toned shirtless male models. Clearly that short span and first in human history invalidates your position. Clearly. Especially when the guy in question is both 6'3" and muscular but with a layer of insulation covering it.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:37 AM
4

Word. Even on things unrelated to emotional support, best to go to real people. However, I've turned to chatGPT for all my engineering questions now after being told "be less high next time you ask" by r/MechanicalEngineering scrubs. Taking GPT's comments with a grain of salt, not only does my idea on vacuum systems hold water, GPT confirmed it's a genuinely unique design and application of known physics and materials. Now just to motivate myself to start life all over again and seek a third deg…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:19 AM
2

This is one of those things that, unless you're qualified and really prepared for what you may find, it's best not to read the psych research. It gets pretty dark pretty quick relative to contemporary standards. I'm not saying their claims are true or ok, but the extent I'll go to is that when asked to rank images of various women's faces, irrespective of men's age or culture, the highest ranked faces fell into a range more acceptable during previous times in human history commonly seen in Medie…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:06 AM
17

Oh gawd. If it hasn't been done, someone has to photoshop current Ron Jeremy onto the covers of a few novels now.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 01:49 AM
2

Been there and a major reason why I'm not active in psychology much more. Funny that a post in r/science a day or two ago showed research that both political extremes are engaging in religious thinking and becoming even more polarized. I pointed at both sides as guilty, that questioning ideology in both is akin to blasphemy, and received the expected "no, it's them, not us" argument (guess from which side) in full irony and parody of themselves, made pathetically worse for the difference in up a…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:39 AM
5

Though for the last few yeas, my android has done this ducking sit. It even censors "cuss words." I have to double check every time, and it massively bucks and kisses me off.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 05:58 AM
4

But haven't you heard?? Black men are the white men of the minority community. It still boggles the mind people actually believe that.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 10:13 PM
2

Welcome to anything dealing with kids. Depressingly few people can keep a straight head on their shoulder without defaulting to whatever knee-jerk bullshit their intuition and personal biases cling to.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 10:12 PM
1

Supercalifragilisticexpialidumbshit.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 09:09 PM
4

The same as patriarchy. Just with a pink bow, so it's different now. Just like Pacman and Ms. Pacman. Totally different.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 09:19 AM
16

That's certainly one way to attempt rationalizing away abuse while condoning overgeneralizations.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 09:09 AM
1

Eat my ass.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:55 AM
-1

No, no, no. As I've had thoroughly screamed at me before being banned from whatever sub, it's not possible for overreach to happen. As we all know, pinning an identity badge to your ego is all you need to be incapable of hypocritical abuse. Edit: Downvotes? Wow. People are slow if they need a /s on this one.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 08:59 PM
15

What do ya mean? What's wrong with the stench of a yeast infection teetering atop burrito farts and self-loathing? Then again, may be a reason why IUDs call her "Shawshank."
/r/MensRights03/07/23 08:32 PM
8

Interesting. I can't recall MGTOW shutting down public centers to scream at passersby during a "demonstration" and vandalizing property like Femen, let alone beheading anyone back when you could post it on YouTube. Almost like there's some sort of bias here.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 06:40 AM
6

Truth, though there are plenty of movies after 2000 that are still great - I don't care what people say, most early Rob Schneider movies are funny as shit. Know what, I'm gonna go put on Chasing Amy and nostalgia binge movies from when Kevin Smith still had his balls. Can you imagine the shitstorm today if you made a movie where a lesbian character is "converted" straight? Ya know, since bisexuality doesn't exist because something, something, minority card traitor.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 05:49 AM
31

Just the Sisterhood of the Traveling Goalpost driving over, backing up, and driving over again any semblance of logical consistency. Then again, logic is a patriarchal construct designed to keep women oppressed, so their logic of being illogical is internally sound. Crap, now they have to kill that too to be free from the shackles. Only unlogic left is to so support their fellow woman. Ball's in your court, feminists. (psst, no one tell them that's what they were supposed to do in the first plac…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 11:31 AM
30

Not well but could've been worse for the one that I truly dated - the others were the usual "Chase me. Wait, nevermind. I'm bored now" types. I knew our relationship was over when we started talking about past bad experiences, and after she trauma dumped but before we got to the hell I've been though, we shifted to crime stats, most notably that "1 in 5 women will experience sexual violence in her lifetime." She was nearly done with nursing school and should've had the stats background to proper…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 08:26 AM
2

Stupid people, i.e. ideologues, yeah. At the risk of being flippant and dismissive, what's next - you'll tell us it's next to impossible to educate scientologists, catholics, hindus, or ashkenazi jews their religions are bullshit, because clearly Joseph Smith got it right? lol Information immunity isn't a new concept, and what remains of the scientifically minded in psychology continue to study what to do. Currently, just staying the course and keeping to the information without attacking the ot…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 07:27 AM
1

Apart from removing "real woman" from your lexicon, good on ya. We get what ya mean, but every woman is a real woman, not every woman is what the Aussies call a "roight cunt."
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:06 AM
3

Yep. Though depending on context/what's been claimed, I like to ask where the cutoff is, as women's prisons exist. At what point do crime stats and the outlook on them move from reasonable concern to paranoia unworthy of consideration. The usual weak argument wrongfully appealing to whataboutism is typically their only refuge, but it's still fun to watch people squirm when faced with the reality that men see the bulk of violence from men and women. And just I've yet to see a bicep defend against…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 04:47 AM
2

You're getting downvotes because by failing to use quotes or better phrasing, people are assuming you're agreeing with the claim that men's work doesn't matter because it's paid, and women's unpaid "abuse" is the only thing that matters because not being monetarily compensated for house work everyone has to do is abuse somehow. I live alone, so do I get to claim doing the dishes and laundry for free is abuse? I wanna talk to my manager!
/r/MensRights28/06/23 09:51 AM
10

Well, yeah. As we all know, women don't abuse and are the arbiters of all that is sugar, spice, and everything nice 🙄
/r/MensRights28/06/23 04:26 AM
1

Well you see, men are responsible. Men aren't allowed to be drawn to things they're naturally drawn to. Men being naturally drawn to provocatively dressed women is men seeking to control women through their natural interests, as women who don't dress with their tits out still get attention but less of it. Let's completely forget that our species used to walk around naked, western cultures are the only ones that sexualize female breasts (just ignore all the shirtless guys used in ads), and ultima…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 03:21 AM
8

God, I hate dealing with that. I can't say when exactly, but seems between 2005 and 2010 is when society fundamentally stopped understanding how comparisons work. Any comparison, despite the phrase "to compare and contrast" clearly indicating looking at elements that are similar and dissimilar, is instead interpreted to mean items are equated with one another. These days, if you compare two things, you're saying they're the same thing, evidently. My first major argument on reddit was with someon…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 02:59 AM
3

Been there and literally got the "Sorry, I took too much cold medicine" excuse. And surprise, surprise, HR really didn't care. All they did like a month after was to move her to a different location. Amazing how it's all an "old boy's club" yet when the DM is a friend and the woman who trained you, it's not the old boys who come to the rescue.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 11:05 AM
9

Nah. At first, they'll be happy. But as systems falter and the few who have the skills to prolong their existence are torn down by infighting, they'll then return to blaming us for misogynistically not "stepping up" from beyond the grave. In short: All men kill themselves, women most affected.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:43 AM
7

Well, when you dismantle the patriarchy, what are you supposed to do? NOT rebuild it but slap a pretty pink bow on it so it's totally different now and men are still to blame?
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:48 AM
3

Almost like there's something to that old "within seconds of meeting someone, everyone assesses their breeding fitness." Can't say for all of you, but I find it hard to express my entire personality in all of 3-5 seconds. Hasn't stopped people from trying on TikTok though. Reality is, everyone is superficial if all you have available to you is superficial. The real sticking point here is that we see women rate things like humor and personality higher than men, yet when we observe and test, we se…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:00 AM
8

Imagine marrying someone you supposedly loved then dumping them because their terminal illness "killed my vibe."
/r/MensRights23/06/23 11:38 PM
5

Hadn't you realized? You're to be stoic but absolutely not stoic in any capacity, because that's toxic masculinity. You must feel your emotions but never express them, as men are to be seen but not heard, but if you bottle your feelings up, that's also toxic masculinity. And if you should at any point express anything other than the prescribed male emotions of celebratory indifference and whatever facial expressions that can't be interpreted as "rapist," or "happy" as women have widely been obse…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 11:27 PM
1

Oh, noes! You got me on a pedantic counterpoint that's easily crushed by merely by better qualifying that the victimhood of those in possession of articulating social signifiers perceived, socially, to be universally and overridingly disadvantaged grants such socially defined groups social power. Man, you really aren't doing the left any favors, socially speaking. They do not rise to the level of someone being able to exercise racism against you. Except that's exactly what they show as much as a…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 07:27 PM
7

What do you mean? When people feel attacked, how is the solution not to attack them? Your MRA logic is hard to understand and clearly rooted in misogyny. ​ /s for the slow people here
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:48 PM
2

My bad. I hadn't realize the irrelevance of other races also sharing in activities aimed at whites generally rather than those responsible for Floyd isn't a red herring because you feel it's a valid rebuttal. Regardless, wake me when you realize victimhood is power, as was demonstrated per my personal experiences that you have yet to fully comprehend, likely as it doesn't pat your pet narrative on the head. It'll probably be when you realize that black people can be anything these days, even rac…
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:35 PM
6

black people cannot use their hate to affect white people True. I mean, the BLM riots were just a misunderstanding and not a big deal that didn't impact whites of their respective areas indiscriminately of whether or not they'd ever damaged or even disparaged the black community. Certainly no violence has ever been experienced by someone saying "all lives matter" or similar tired messaging. Probably shouldn't look deeper into other forms of anti-white pressure from the black community, since it …
/r/MensRights15/06/23 09:11 AM
4

Incorrect. Just as the classic example of yelling "FIRE" when there isn't one isn't protected speech, neither is this. Many states have specific laws related to this type of speech that go beyond harassment and move into manslaughter or similar charges. And since this is Pennsylvania, here ya go.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:30 AM
40

Pretty much this. No one hates or is a bigger threat to women, especially young women, than Ol' Virginia.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:18 AM
7

And what's really pathetic is I've met plenty of feminists either in denial about that result or fully see that as a good thing. Hit a fever pitch back when it was proposed that it may be possible to extract DNA from egg cells to implant into another egg. I can't recall the last time I heard some guy casually talk about eradicating all women, but, hey - just remember that this sub is full of sexist dudebro neckbeards angry they can't get laid.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 12:27 AM
4

Look up the psychological definition of "automatic thoughts." Plus general society has shifted further from modernist "this is what I mean" to postmodernist "this is what you mean." It's not about the intent of your words that matters, it's the effect. If the effect of your words is a person feels uncomfortable, you're a creep rather than the other person having deep seated, untreated issues - given you didn't say something like, "Hey, baby. Ever had your asshole licked by a fat guy in an overco…
/r/MensRights14/06/23 12:01 AM
-17

Yeah, but if you're going to go full TERF with this, hmmmmmmm. While they obviously are different elements, they're not mutually exclusive. It's as if there's a kind of venn diagram showing that, sure, there are separate parts at the edges, but there's still mutuality in the middle. If trans men who are able to pass as biological men face the same experiences as males proper, not a good look to irrationally and arbitrarily go full. Edit: Lol you people are just as bad the the usual feminists on …
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:23 AM
2

Yup, but I'd say this goes beyond blood feud logic though, due to the classic "sins of the father are sins of the son" worsened greatly by these women themselves willfully creating the very people they hate and abusing them during their most vulnerable years.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:10 AM
1

My bad. Forgot it's ethical for a supposedly trained practitioner to give into negative impulses after feeling attacked, willfully seek information about someone's entity, act out on information incorrectly confirming knee-jerk conclusions, and conflate two related but separate elements that, were this individual competent, they'd know not to confuse, all while failing to consider their own motivations in this behavior. Having a similar background, seemed obvious to me, but you've clearly needed…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:04 AM
1

Precisely. Every time I hear about "deadbeat dads," it's a countdown before it's revealed whoever's talking is actually speaking about a guy who never wanted to be a father being forced into effective indentured servitude. Sure, the kid needs support, but that was a conversation and consideration for before delivery, not after. Besides, you're a strong and independent woman who ain't need no man. Live by that and enjoy. And don't get me wrong, deadbeat dads do exists, but they're the ones who wa…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 07:59 PM
23

It's just like how we're expected to make up for the experiences of people who've been dead for hundreds of years. There's an imaginary score bored that has little to do with justice and everything to do with retribution, moral licensing, and displacement. Some bad men have gotten off without consequences, but so long as they get some guy, any guy, everything is better somehow.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 09:10 AM
44

What do you expect? Textbook halo vs horns effect. There's a reason why everyone wants to save the penguins but no one gives a shit about blobfish.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 09:06 AM
1

My bad. Completely forgot I, like the 99% of the world that doesn't speak German, was supposed to just know that off the top of my head. Totally reasonable that the article neither provided context nor a link to the original study.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 09:02 AM
-6

From the article that conveniently didn't link to the study in question: "34% of men from that age bracket admitted to being violent towards their female partner in the past, to “instil respect in them.” 33% said they thought it was acceptable if their “hand slipped” occasionally during an argument with their partner." So slapping your hands together is violence against women now. Learn something new everyday.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 09:47 PM
86

Well, explains why their self-deletion rate is so high. Finally get what you want only to realize the world not only still hates you, it hates for a whole new set of reasons that you very likely weren't raised to handle while also not having access to or otherwise being denied the social support that was previously thrown at you often without asking? Yup, I get it. Tough break.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 08:37 AM
1

All valid points, but could also just point to their currently not being shackled to the stove and that someone is listening to them rather than enacting the myth of the rule of thumb. Also could point out there are currently over 7 billion people in the world, half of them women. If we're using a shiny trinket awarded to 1 person (or group) per field per year as the metric to say there's a bias against women, especially in context to the availability of women in relevant fields as there no Nobe…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 12:18 AM
-1

Wow, I really got to ya that you felt the need to cyberstalk me. Fitting behavior for my point about psychological incompetence, unfitting behavior for someone claiming to be a psychologist. You'd think a trained psychologist would be capable of recognizing their own paranoia and need to save face to then adjust appropriately, but here we are. Try being less bad at your job. Oh, and you're not the only person here who audited a psych 101 course at a community college 25 years ago. You need to hi…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:53 PM
1

True until you realize psychology is responsible for a LOT of this due to things not limited to overcompensating for listing homosexuality as a mental disorder for decades. Rather than honestly pointing out to people that we still don't have an empirical clue what things like transgenderism is outside what appears to be predominately sociological phenomena, we bow to the whims of the loudest community. The field is fully aware of the empathy gap between men and women, but are we looking into pro…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:25 PM
0

Yes and no. Comes down to the actual details of what people believe. If you get people to shut the fuck up long enough and hash shit out, you find a lot more common ground than difference. I've used that to get people to pull their heads out of their ideological asses, but it's often still like a lot of what you see on the left - one small, egregiously insignificant point of contention, someone doesn't feel as special as previously thought, or scientific fact becomes inconvenient relative to "my…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:54 PM
11

Makes me wonder if there's something else not made explicit being examined.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 06:37 AM
8

So what you're saying is your data already has an issue with selection effects. Good luck with that. Won't hurt the conclusions drawn from survey methodology though. Can't ruin what's already shit. I dream of the day psychology returns to real research.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 06:34 AM
3

And you can just feel the love. But very, very thin silver lining, they're doing you a favor. Only thing worse than neglect is competence. I view those people a bit of humor like actresses who never have done/refuse to ever do topless scenes - "It's totally ok. I get it. Unfortunate, sad, orangutan titties. You've done me a kindness."
/r/MensRights09/06/23 05:55 AM
16

They're Buzzfeed but with a little more business sense and a slightly less stupid name.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:44 PM
3

Had to check it out, since evidently I hate myself. Protip, your computer has its own mute button. Edit: Yup. I hate myself. Protip No.2, don't bother.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:38 PM
5

I mean, they kinda are. Imagine getting drunk, waking up next to that, and her going "I'm keeping it."
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:37 PM
3

Because it's not just power, it's power with baked in deniability. If you're a victim, you're not responsible.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:28 PM
1

Can't find which special (I think it was Animals), but Ricky Gervais did a hilarious bit on this years ago. Fucking legendary. Got him labeled everything in the Alt-Left Handbook of Very Super Cereal Terminology. And what's funnier, trying to google which standup it's from just nets a ton of accusations of him being transphobic. God I love that man.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:26 PM
1

Gotta love how that "punching down" thought terminating cliche has proliferated so well. Sorry, but just as having a disability doesn't absolve you of abusing of others, being perceived as being "low" on the social totem pole doesn't save you from your actions. This isn't someone walking up and punching a short bus kid because they can. This is someone taking their ice cream cone back from Simple Dan.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:14 PM
2

(or at least I've seen similar there before twitter happened) Reading comprehension. Do you haz it? Anyway, It's about male feminists that act like all men are evil to be accepted by feminists and turn out to be the thing they claim to despise Which is prototypical behavior of a "nice guy misogynist." Glad we got that one ironed out. Yay team.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:00 PM
4

companies slapping breast cancer pink on everything Victoria's Secret isn't any different. But does appear Pink is intended to be it's own thing. Swear I remember a fuck ton of commercials when awareness month became a thing, but either way, it's still basic emotional leverage aimed at an easy purse.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:35 PM
13

Careful. You're dangerously close to being called an egalitarian or, worse, a humanist! There was a time when those were the two worst words a person could use to describe themselves rather than feminist. The 2010s were a strange time.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 06:52 AM
1

Right. Because freedom of expression isn't a core liberal value. My bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 06:49 AM
18

If you want more irony, consider "pink tax" and the rhetoric behind it in context of the Pink brand originally (if I'm not mistaken) using breast cancer awareness to sell clothing provide funding for research.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:43 AM
73

Not to mention all the market research that shows women are uncritical cash cows. Or do these women expect companies that employ those same women or are run by women to, as they say, "leave money on the table"? They know you want it and will pay for it.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:21 AM
1

It does, but not to the shrieking levels commonly stated. For the privilege most who unironically use the term mean, you need a heeeeeeeavy dose of classism (granted much of that is also involved with nepotism), but since entities on the left very strangely don't like realizing much of their arguments actually boil down to class reductionism, we get shit like "yes all men." My favorite soundbite related to privilege is related to whiteness if you're not doing well because, "you're just bad at be…
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:13 AM
0

Incorrect, but I agree engaging with someone who's going to formulate their own argument and attack that instead is a waste of my time. The sentience moved to consciousness is a real great example. Now go let science know you've figured out what they've spent centuries trying to answer and collect your Nobel Prize.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 04:39 AM
0

I don't feel artificially good about it, I just feel it's the right action based on the best current evidence I've seen. For all your vitiriolic talk I feel you're the one acting on poor reasoning and information. That's some hard cope, "homie." Best parts were when you attacked points I didn't make. Faceists gonna faceist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 04:26 AM
3

Don't bet on it. I was invited to be a, for lack of a better word, part of ROAR (Radical Organizing Against Rape) back when "mansplaning" became a thing. After I got fed up with the constant harassment and direct threats of violence if I disagreed with this or that new, very intelligence, much rigorous concept, I reported the group and users to see what would happen. Even with that extreme level, take a wild guess what response I got.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:39 AM
14

It's an old comic from Jezebel (or at least I've seen similar there before twitter happened) to say basically that. It's the "nice guy misogynist" taken to a new extreme to, you guessed it, say any man in feminist spaces is a predator. Definitely no paranoia there.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:34 AM
18

Implying male feminists are predators rather than the vast majority of them just being very misguided...... Good thing women never rape, and there's never any such or similar abuse in lesbian relationships, because then that shit comic would have a point.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:30 AM
20

I often call this "DeFartes 'I feel: therefore, it is'"
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:27 AM
-2

That's certainly a lot of words to say "I don't understand how plant biology works beyond a single high school biology class I got a C+ in let alone anything else about botanical life, and since I'm only able to think in terms of animalia, as per why I failed to even touch on fungi and microorganisms, and since if I can't think of something or don't know something, it doesn't exist, I've deemed myself a very serious person." Sensory organs? You mean these? Locomotion, you mean like this? Not to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 03:18 AM
154

And while you'd think that'd help people pull their heads out of their asses, it's just a more refined source of anti-male paranoia. "YOU MEAN MY FRIEND MIGHT RAPE ME?????" *facepalm
/r/MensRights08/06/23 01:07 AM
25

Almost like safety theater is a thing. These people are little more than the TSA incarnate.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 01:05 AM
1

Yup. Though, veganism itself is oxymoronic. They talk about exploitation and abuse of animals all while oblivious that their focus makes them little more than faceists. Turns out, plants, fungi, and microbiota are all also living, sensing, self-directed organisms. But it's ok if we exploit them in ways that'd make the killing floor look like Barney on ice if done to animals. In vitro fertilization is bad yet it's fine to hack off plant genitals and rub them wherever? And don't get me started abo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 12:35 AM
6

Right. Because there's no contradicting themes of women being expected to own their sexuality while also never expressing it, as doing so is just appeasement of the male sex drive, but you go get 'em, queen! Do you also think hispanics would never vote for Trump? Turns out there's a reason why you should never underestimate the human propensity to act against one's own interests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 12:23 AM
8

Like many, many, oh so depressingly many concepts in feminism, I've always found the notion to be poorly conceived and plain idiotic. Unless we start tacking, stapling, nailing, screwing, banging, smashing, and otherwise affixing affixations to abuse language into matching its definition (especially per its use), it outright denies the variety found with both male and female sexualities and as they relate to and travel between hetero and homosexuality. It's the same level of stupidity you see wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 12:16 AM
59

Because of course feminists can't be bothered to do something genuinely clever like "Guy, no centrism here" Edit: You guys are awesome and make me want to actually pursue this. Seemed stupid obvious to me, but if it takes a little effort, should be easy to play with word spacing to obscure the real message a little more. Just imagine selling these at a rally and, since there's clearly not a lot of critical thinking going on, now there's a sea of feminists unwittingly marking themselves with a le…
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:56 PM
3

No, no, no. You're thinking of Thailand, and menopause is just a stage name.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:38 PM
8

Given people haven't figured out that consenting to sex doesn't imply consenting to parenthood, very true. Go ahead and keep the kid or not in whatever way you so please, no man should be forced into the shackles of parenthood purely because of her singular choice after the fact anymore than she should be forced to deliver.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:36 PM
1

I haven't had the wherewithal to watch them, but I keep getting recommended youtube videos by GrowingUpInScientology. If I ever do, I won't hold my breath over if they cover any of the presented evidence, but I'd image an independent channel is more likely to than any other shit rag from legacy media.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:04 PM
8

Not to mention, kinda hard to be a man when the land costs you an arm and a dick.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 11:14 AM
10

But just remember, something, something, incel, something, something I am serious person. Everything you experienced was your fault, because of reasons. And you need to check your privilege. Patriarchy. Oh, and since you mentioned you have a dog, that's now slavery. /s if it wasn't obvious
/r/MensRights07/06/23 05:05 AM
41

You forgot all the hate from both sexes too. From women, you need to "do better." From other men, you need to "man up." And that's just the PG side of things.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 04:56 AM
6

Came across the original post. It was heartening to see that the comments pointed out the obvious sexism at play.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/23 04:07 AM
1

Beat me to it. I'm a self-identified nerd, formally studied in psych and literature, fields preeminently dominated by women, and have played the sturdy shoulder to many and published poetry. Yet I've felt the still warm fluids of a recently live beast drip from my elbows as I sliced deeply among the steaming recesses of its chest cavity, the cold winter wind biting at my face like vengeful spirits. But I've not nor would I ever vote conservative, given one never legitimately backs the people ove…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 09:46 AM
4

Thanks. However, ya see, I'm a "self-important pseudointellectual so recursively far up my own ass, I crowned myself a dentist, then proctologist, in that order." Slight chance I've rustled some jimmies over the years.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 07:31 AM
21

That's their default, and the rates of botched procedures are lost on them. I like to pull the ol' "Ok. If they're not comparable, since understanding how comparisons work is hard, hand me your daughter. Don't worry. According to your logic, I'm not going to harm her. I'm simply going to start peeling, slicing, and clipping sections of unimportant skin from her ear. You tell me when it's no longer ok. Following that, we'll then compare the skin amounts to circumcision." They don't often connect …
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:04 AM
31

Well, duh. Woman=victim, victim=no agency, no agency=no responsibility, vis-a-vie all men are all simultaneously responsible, because patriarchy, as all women are forced to go along for the ride. I mean, if women did have agency at any point, that'd throw a wrench into this, as they'd share at least some culpability for the situations they're in and consequences they experience. That's just logic, baby.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/23 02:50 AM
-1

To be fair, "toxic masculinity" used to mean a specific form of masculinity that was, good guess, deleterious to the individual and those around them such as superlative machismo and other aggressive or selfish behavior. However, just like with "mansplaning," semantic shift per genericide supplanted that definition, as nuance is hard for those playing king of the hill on a bell curve.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/23 02:44 AM
16

I'll take "people who've unironically used 'Schrodinger's rapist' in casual conversation" for 200, Alex.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 02:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter