TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Drusylla Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by Drusylla on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thank you for explaining this to me. I understand your point of view. You call them "benefits" and "privileges". I don't see them as "benefits" and "privileges". I see them as injustices and disservices. Those injustices and disservices must be corrected. I don't believe men should have to deal, live with, put up with, sacrifice for those injustices and disservices. That is why I fight for men's rights. Any kind of "benefit" and "privilege" that takes the blood, sweat, and tears from someone is …
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:58 PM
1

Have a problem with your husband, and want to fuck his life up? All it takes for you to do that is to make a phone call and say he hit/raped you. Just off your word alone, you can accomplish that goal of destroying him. Yes, that is completely true and one of the very reasons I fight FOR men's rights. I don't believe ANY person should have the power to destroy someone's life on a whim. I could no sooner do that to my own husband than I could fly. You're trapped and need rescue with a mixed group…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:37 PM
1

My sons are a starting point, yes. But even if I didn't have sons, I would still fight for men's rights. I do give a shit about men's rights because I believe everyone should be treated equally. Race, gender, sex. People are people and everyone deserves human rights. Men have women allies. Black people have white allies. Gays have straight allies. Why would you turn your back on people who want to be your ally? Why fight alone when you have others who will stand behind you and support you?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:41 PM
1

I have 3 sons and I would very much like for them to live in a world where a mere glance at a woman won't make them a registered sex offender.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:34 PM
30

We've also had this conversation with our son. We've also had the conversation with our son AND daughters about what consent is, what rape is, what regret is, how to differentiate between rape and regret, when consent is valid (drunk vs sober, pressured vs not pressured, etc). I am 100% for having the conversation with the sons but daughters also need that same education. How else are we going to break that cycle? **Edited to add: We also covered making false claims and why that's terrible.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:00 PM
1

I always got teen mom comments and strangers assuming I was throwing my life away when I had my older 3 kids. Also just about everyone assumed that my husband and I only got married because I was pregnant. Nope. Got married first. Got pregnant pretty early in our marriage. Still together and still happy!
/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:27 AM
2

Oh I know! For fun, before we had kids, my husband and I played around with the punnet square to see what the approximate percentages would be for us having darker skin kids vs lighter skin (I'm black/white, he's white). We always joked that we could have one kid that was darker than me and another that would be as white as snow. Though, we figured our kids would be kind of in the middle-ish. I was pretty shocked when 2 of our kids came out white/blonde even though I knew it that could be a smal…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:20 AM
3

I balked that she said that to you. My daughters that are white/blonde people have assumed were my mom's kids (my mom is white), especially my 7 month old. Recently my mom and I went yarn shopping and she was holding my baby so I could browse. A woman came up to her and said "Oh my gosh! Your baby is so adorable! How old is she?!" My mom corrected her "This is my grandbaby. My daughter, her mother, is right over there." Woman looked at me and said "Oh...Cute baby." and walked off. I just rolled …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:28 PM
12

I'm mixed race and my husband is white. Our kids are all shades. Two of them are white and blonde (neither of us are blonde but both of us do have blonde people in our families). If I'm out with our two kids that are white, I get looks (and I'm the mom)-especially since one of them is 7 months old. If my husband takes the kids that have a "year long tan and curly hair", he gets looks. If we're out together with our kids, the number one question asked is a variable of if we're a blended family. W…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:44 PM
2

My husband used the argument that he wanted his son to "match" him. My response was: "Every penis looks different just like every vulva looks different. Would you be okay with having our girls surgically altered to match me? Or what if you were born an amputee? Would it be okay to have our childrens' limbs amputated so they match you?" My husband regrets circumcising our oldest. Our son understands that when he was born, with the information at the time, it was what was done. He knows that infor…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:11 PM
2

Yes because we have open communication with him. We explained why we had him circumcised, how we regretted it, and if we knew better then, it wouldn't have been done. He knew we didn't do it maliciously and he doesn't hold it against us.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:14 PM
17

but will circumcise the next son anyway just so that we don't have to explain why he's different from his brother I have 3 sons. Our first son was circumcised due to my husband's wishes. Our youngest 2 boys are not. While I was pregnant with our oldest, I wanted to know exactly what we were getting into so I researched the hell out of it. I found both pro's and cons but I decided it was not necessary. Like you, I debunked all the common myths that my husband brought up. I only wanted him to go o…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:55 PM
5

Because my husband and I had done our research and our son's pediatrician was FOR the vaccine. We are a pro vaccination family. When it comes to that, no, our kids' pediatrician do not need to try to convince us.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 03:44 PM
22

As soon as my oldest son was old enough to receive the HPV vaccine, he got it. His pediatrician started to talk about it and I stopped him: "Give it to him. No arguments here." When my son asked what it was for, I explained it to him, which surprised his pediatrician because I guess parents don't want to educate their kids about the vaccine because OMG SEX. We all grow up and have sex at some point in our lives. It just makes sense to help protect your kids and their future partners.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 12:11 AM
2

In case you're not joking, my son is pretty open and honest with his father and I. We've talked to him about the "dangers of the interwebz" and he knows what is expected of him. He has yet to do anything that would make us, you know, not trust him. And he mainly uses Reddit to fuel conversations with me and his dad. "Hey parents. Did you see that article about this? Look at this cute cat picture! What did this person mean about this?" We have worked our asses off to establish open communications…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 09:22 PM
1

Nah, it's just Reddit. How much trouble can he get in on here? :P
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:50 PM
6

He (supposedly) has an account. I have no clue what it is lol
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:05 PM
5

No I am not joking. That was how the conversation went. We were discussing sex and consent with our 3 oldest kids (13 yr old son, 11 yr old daughter, and 9 yr old daughter). So our daughters also got "If you say no, the other person needs to stop. If the other person says no, you need to stop."
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:59 PM
10

We said this to our son (13 yr old) as well. And then we said "In the same token, YOU have the right to say no at any time. If you are uncomfortable for any reason, you have the right to say no. You are not obligated to go through with anything. If you say no, SHE has to stop, too. If she doesn't stop and proceeds without your consent, it is still considered rape. Men can be raped, too." His response: "I know, Mom. I'm on /r/mensrights, too."
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:20 PM
20

My mom did the same thing with me growing up. She purposely sabotaged my relationship with him as a child. When I tried to have a relationship with him multiple times as an adult and it didn't work out, her response was "Well, I would have tried to warn you but I didn't want to be the bad guy. I'm sorry you had to find out for yourself like this but I didn't want to get in the way."
/r/MensRights27/05/16 04:51 PM
5

I have 3 sons and 2 daughters. I don't want to send any of my kids to a war.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:05 PM
2

Not OP and I don't live in TX but when I turned 18, I was still in high school. My dad had to pay my mom child support until I graduated high school.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 11:53 PM
47

The father never signed the adoption papers. Just the mom. Nielsen, 20, said the woman changed her mind a week after the birth and signed off on Kaylee's adoption, despite his objections and intentions to raise the child. He refused to sign adoption papers and said he would raise the daughter with the support of his family.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:25 PM
16

True. I've just seen so much shit that women do so the bio mom's actions does not surprise me.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:56 PM
661

I love how the adoptive parents said they were happy to return the baby to her "loving biological mother." The mother signed her over in a week. The father has been fighting for his daughter. And now the mother wants primary custody and the father to have visitation. Bull.Fucking.Shit.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:26 PM
2

Fun fact: When we were trying to conceive, I said we should get plastered and have boink as that is the #1 way women get pregnant. It worked! So we have one child who is a rape baby! :)
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:23 AM
25

As a woman, I feel more at home in MRA than I ever would in a feminist group. Maybe it's because I have a brain and use things like logic, reason, and am rational. Oh and-my husband and I raped each other last night! It was GLORIOUS.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 05:55 PM
3

"thats not the point, stop making this all about you" That's something a narcissist would say. Makes you wonder about those kind of feminists.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:59 PM
12

My mom alienated me from my father growing up, telling me lies about how he didn't want me. When my father and I reconciled (it was difficult for me to give him the chance considering what I was told growing up), we compared notes and that's when we BOTH found out that my mom had been lying to us! She'd tell me that he'd want nothing to do with me and then go tell him I'd want nothing to do with him. The truth will come out.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:41 AM
2

I can imagine how disgusting it was. When my maternal grandfather died, my mom found out the hard way that he was an extreme hoarder. He let his house fall apart so much that it was condemned after his death. It is appalling to me that CPS would let children live in those conditions. I really hope everything works out for your friend.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 11:24 PM
2

How is untreated lice not abusive? You're letting your kid be a mansion for parasites! Has CPS seen the conditions of the house? Do they not care about that, too?
/r/MensRights18/01/15 08:26 PM
1

I completely agree! How is it any different for a stay at home mom expecting her husband to pitch in after he gets home from work? My brother in law gets so much shit from the inlaws for being the stay at home parent. My mother in law has even commented that he should be a man and be the one working because "That is how it should be."
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:21 PM
23

Oh my husband and I have (since it's my husband's family). We both have pointed out the hypocrisy and the inlaws say "Well, he doesn't do this, this, or this. As soon as she gets home, he hands the kids off. She shouldn't have to do housework when she works full time." They all make excuses on why they don't like him when he does the SAME EXACT THINGS the stay at home moms do.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:35 AM
46

I have a brother in law who is the stay at home parent and his wife is the breadwinner. They agreed that is what works for them. His wife's family (my inlaws) have all called him lazy, a mooch, and a deadbeat along with a few choice words. Yet, my sister in laws, who are stay at home parents, that's okay. It's okay for them to stay home and drink and do whatever but not okay for him to stay home and actually take care of things.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:09 AM
8

I had my son 8 months ago and I was so afraid the hospital was going to shove circumcision in my face every moment that I was there like the nurses did with the epideral (sp??) that I explicitly stated a million times I did not want. Not one person mentioned it. Not even the hospital pediatrician. I was so happy!
/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:00 PM
41

I had a serious debate with some of my female friends about why all of our mutual male friends said they would not, under any circumstances, help a child in distress in public. All of the women were perplexed as to why their male friends would just leave a child wondering around in public lost or whatever the case may be. This debate was sparked by the ASU (or U of A?) professor who was kicked out of Barnes N Noble (in Scottsdale, Arizona) for being "suspicious" in the children's book section. H…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:09 AM
1

Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:02 AM
4

Oh I totally agree! If anything like this was aimed at women in the workplace, everyone (or maybe just the men) would be going through sexual harassment classes and the guilty party (or parties) would have been dealt with. Yet because the list is of men, "GAWD Can't you GUYS take a JOKE???"
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:07 AM
13

I'm a female and I find that behavior absolutely disgusting. I would not work at a place that would allow sexual harassment from either gender. If HR is willing to let that go, who knows what else they'd let slide.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 03:11 AM
2

Contact a lawyer AND your local media. Seriously. Fuck HR if they think that's "joke" worthy.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 02:35 AM
17

Which is to say - a group of male employees pass around a list rating the women from 1-10, and for the 8-10 group add comments like "I wouldn't mind trapping her in the copy room and slipping it in from behind", or "You just know she loves it rough - let's tie her to her desk, gag her, and have some fun." Shoe on the other foot, it's suddenly a lot clearer to the masses that this is wrong.) I came here to say this but you already covered it :)
/r/MensRights30/06/13 01:55 AM
1

Yes we were stationed in Norfolk, VA. This was over 10 yrs ago, mind you. Policies may have changed since then.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:17 PM
2

Because if a service member didn't want their spouse to get sterilized, then they could deny them that since it's "their" insurance as the policy holder as you're saying. They could say "No I don't want the military to pay for my spouse's sterilization." Military says "Cool. We're not covering it." Therefore, the spouse, in a sense does have control over the other one's reproductive rights. That's the power that I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:51 AM
1

Then it's not the HUSBAND'S permission she needs but the INSURANCE. Big difference. The insurance is the one who chooses what procedures are and are not done. Not the spouse. *Edited: Fingers type faster than brain registers and forgot a word.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:39 AM
1

Bodily autonomy. Either everyone has it or no one does. You can't say "A person can choose to do whatever (s)he wants with his/her own body unless it's under their spouse's insurance. Then the spouse can make that choice for them." Especially when it comes to reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:27 AM
0

The costs of avoiding pregnancy are nothing compared to the costs of prenatal care, labor and delivery, and all the pediatrician appointments that follow. Having kids is elective and yet, women don't need their husband's permission to have children under his insurance.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:39 AM
1

Ah yes. My favorite "Just don't have sex" argument. Because everyone will stop having sex when they don't want kids, especially married couples.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:29 AM
0

The signature is probably to make sure that she doesn't use the insurance for some elective surgery that the husband doesn't want her to get I could maybe understand if she wanted the military to pay for some new pair of tits or other unneeded plastic surgery but she was getting her tubes tied as they were done having children. Permanent birth control. She shouldn't need his permission for this no more than a guy needing his wife's permission to donate sperm. Should she need her husband's signat…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:00 AM
1

He was the military member and she was the dependent. If it's bureaucratic reasons, I can understand. The military is it's own world. She told me the doctor had told her she couldn't get it done unless she had the permission of her husband. Maybe the doctor phrased it wrong or she took it as such.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:39 AM
1

If pharmacists have to redirect you to someone who will fill your prescription if they won't, would a doctor have to refer you to someone who will do a procedure if they won't?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:30 AM
1

True, but that's their own personal policy, part of which is motivated by potential liability suits from a spouse, part by their own personal beliefs, part by knowing that sometimes people make rash decisions and it's a stopgap to make them think it over. Personal beliefs over someone else's reproductive decisions doesn't belong in the medical practice. If a doctor thinks their patient is making a rash decision, that is why they should advise against it and provide their patient with some readin…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:09 AM
0

It's the reason why they have the you must be X years AND have X many children before sterilization. In case something happens to you, you still have children to carry on your genes. Though, to be fair, civilian doctors have this requirement too so it is certainly not just the military. The difference here would be in a civilian life, the person getting sterilized would have to pay for the banking themselves if they choose to do it. The military could make it a requirement and the taxpayers can …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:20 AM
1

To give you an idea, they got married after knowing each other for 3 weeks and yet were against my husband and I getting married because we had a long distant relationship for over 3 years (he was in the Navy).
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:14 AM
1

No, they most definitely do not have an open marriage. She told me she suspected he was sleeping around and so she made him get fixed so he wouldn't get any one pregnant.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:10 AM
0

A private insurance can do the same thing. They decide what terms and conditions they provide their services. Just because you're paying for it doesn't mean they will provide everything you want for free. If the military was really concerned about potential offspring, they could pay for a private banking of sperm/eggs and let the person be sterilized.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:08 AM
1

Permission for the military to pay for it? If it's military insurance, why would the doctors need the husband's signature for that? Wouldn't the doctors have to through the insurance? I'm sorry, I am a bit confused.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:05 AM
1

Well that scenario I can completely understand :P I just thought it was absurd that she was more worried about him getting another woman pregnant than she was the actual cheating.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:02 AM
1

One of my sister in laws made her husband get a vasectomy because "I don't want some bitch claiming he impregnated her if he cheats on me". I kid you not. Some marriage there.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:48 AM
0

How is it dictating terms to not want to have your spouse's permission if you want to be sterilized? Does a guy need his wife's permission to get a vasectomy? I'd be pretty pissed if my husband tried to get one (under military insurance) and they told him no even though he meets the requirements (which is another thing I have an issue with) because he needed my signature.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:46 AM
1

After my husband and I had our 3 kid, his family told me I needed to make him get a vasectomy. I told them no. It was his balls and if he didn't want to get snipped, he didn't have to. He is not my property and I am not his. Yet, if he told his family he was making me get my tubes tied or whatever, they would all bitch at him.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:33 AM
2

Which, I think, it's bullshit. If someone, married or not, does not want kids or does not want anymore kids, it should be THEIR choice for sterilization. Doctors should NEVER have any say in the decision whatsoever. The doctors may advise against it but they shouldn't be able to say "No. I am not sterilizing you because you may change your mind."
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:32 AM
1

I'm glad they changed that.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:24 AM
2

I don't know why such policies were put in place. I was only a military wife for all of 8 months and then my husband didn't re-enlist. I know military has their own bureaucracy than civilians. All I know was that she was pretty pissed she had to have her husband's signature or else they wouldn't do it even though she met the requirements (was over 25 and had more than 2 kids). I'm on my husband's insurance and I've never needed his signature for any procedure, elective or otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:21 AM
2

I wish I was lying. She told me the whole story. This was about 10 years ago and he was in the Navy. After kid #3, she wanted to get her tubes tied. Doctors wouldn't do it unless her husband signed the paperwork with her. I'm getting the Essure next month and I certainly didn't need my husband's "permission" for it.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:14 AM
6

Yet when I was friends with a military wife, she had to get her husband's permission to get her tubes tied.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:10 AM
3

Anyone who is being physically assaulted has the right to defend themselves whether it be woman vs woman, man vs man, woman vs man, or man vs woman. A person has the right to defend their body when it is being physically threatened or harmed.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:17 AM
1

If he would have hit her, even in self defense, more than likely HE would have been walking away in handcuffs and not her. Men can't even defend themselves against violent women.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:13 AM
1

This is exactly my view on "choosing" to be gay so I understand completely what you are saying. My favorite argument against that is "Oh really? So when did you choose to be straight?"
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:49 AM
1

My husband and I are 3 1/2 years apart. The entire time we were dating, I kept saying to myself "Once I turn 18, it is magically okay with the law that we're merely 3 1/2 years apart but when I'm 17 and he's 20, all hell breaks loose." We were married one week to the day after I turned 19. If any of our kids were in a similar situation (senior dating a freshman), neither of us would even bat an eye.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:15 AM
1

My junior high/high school did the opposite. My junior high had 7th-9th graders but the junior high was getting rapidly overcrowded. So my freshman year, the 9th graders were sent to the high school. The high school became 9-12th graders. If they hadn't shipped the freshman class to the high school that year (1997), I wouldn't have met my husband (who graduated in 98).
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:03 AM
3

I agree with this. I see no problems with high schoolers dating each other. Hell-I met my husband when I was a freshman (14) and he was a senior (freshly turned 18). We're still together (I'm 30 and he's 33. His birthday is in Aug and mine is in Jan.) If it was such a problem with seniors dating the underclass then maybe the seniors should be the new freshman class in college.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:53 PM
10

Yep I agree. Pregnant or not, this woman did get away with blatant murder.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 02:24 AM
20

Pregnancy shouldn't be an excuse for a lighter sentence. AFAIK if a pregnant woman is sent to prison, she still gets her prenatal care. She'll either give birth in a prison hospital or handcuffed to a bed at a nearby local hospital. Then the baby is either given to next of kin or up for adoption.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:59 AM
2

I still think it is worth looking into. He can always ask a lawyer if it would stand in court or get him a court-ordered DNA test. If he wants his kid back, he needs to be pro-active and take whatever action he can. Hell, if I were him, I'd even take it to the media.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:47 AM
3

He could always wait until he got to the states to do it. I believe his name would be attached to it. It is worth looking into versus doing nothing. At the very least, the courts could see that he is trying to prove the kid is his by doing his own test and they may grant him a court-ordered test.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:17 AM
8

I just want to add about the DNA test. OP doesn't need to get a court order for one. There are at home DNA tests. Luke could pick one up, get the baby's DNA. OP can send his DNA sample to Luke. For a fee, Luke can get it sent to a lab and they will DNA proof within a week. Here is an example of one: http://www.dnatesting.com/dna-paternity-test/identigene-dna-test-kit You can google at home paternity test and a whole bunch of results show up. This way OP can get the proof he needs without a court…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:28 PM
1

Thanks for clarifying :)
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:36 AM
5

I thought alimony was only given if the marriage was 10 years or longer? And it stopped after a certain period of time or until the woman remarried whichever came first? Not being snarky or anything. I'm geniunely (sp?) asking.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:56 AM
1

Yes this is what I thought. Maybe he paid in cash and he didn't keep records.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:54 AM
1

Gotcha. The article made it sound like the doctor told the girlfriend she had an infection and instead of writing a prescription for antibiotics, he wrote the prescription for Cytotec instead.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:53 AM
0

She was six weeks and five days pregnant according to the article. That is still in the 1st trimester. An abortion would obviously still be legal, however, she did not consent to having an abortion. In Arizona, if you cause harm to a pregnant woman that causes her to lose the baby fetus and the baby fetus dies, you get charged with homicide. It doesn't matter if she is 4 weeks pregnant or 40 weeks pregnant. I don't understand how the doctor who wrote the prescription isn't getting charged. And I…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter