TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DuBBle Archive

View 3 posts and 46 comments by DuBBle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Absolutely, not only do many non-Anglo countries escape the prudishness, you will also find (as a reasonably attractive, reasonably wealthy white guy) that your value greatly increases.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 04:00 PM
2

Daily Mail readers may be cretins, but I imagine they still know about the two main US political parties.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/21 05:50 PM
5

If that's what you meant to say then I disagree. Generalizations can be helpful if they're accurate. The problem is when you take a generalization and apply it as a universal truth.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/21 05:44 PM
1

I've actually never been there. I think the joke is that some people will always say 'fake' without any evidence to prove it.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/20 12:44 AM
4

/r/nothingeverhappens
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/20 12:26 AM
4

still does not appreciate the significance of her consequences Shouldn't that be 'significance of her actions'? That's some cyber-police-level phrasing.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 03:16 PM
45

Yeah, she's taking it to the ECHR, and I welcome her to do so. She claims that the police didn't follow proper procedure and she was denied access to a lawyer - which, if true, ought to have an impact on the verdict of the case. I've also heard people say that she had an expert medical witness who said she had injuries consistent with being raped - but what it doesn't say is that these injuries would also be consistent with having rough consensual sex with 12 guys.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/19 03:27 PM
18

Only the autistically super-charged require sarcasm tags, friend. So I suppose they're entirely necessary here.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/19 03:23 PM
10

Probably deal with the consequences every day, they just don't connect the two things.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/19 01:25 PM
1

Nope - pretty hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 11:09 AM
1

To people they barely know over the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 11:23 PM
0

I know a few who do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:09 PM
12

Also, 'You're going to jail but we'll get you some help'. I wonder how often the guy hears that? I wonder how these cops act when there's not a camera on them?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/19 10:46 AM
2

If anyone can find a post-race interview with Anna Sparks I'd love to read it.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 09:46 AM
21

I downvoted for the combo of 'Common misconception by those who don't read' and the fact you didn't think /u/Recon_by_Fire's comment through for alternative interpretations. He was saying that Dr. Frankenstein was the monster because his actions were monstrous.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/16 07:37 AM
1

He gained prominence a couple of years ago when he entered a legal battle with a Scottish council over a wind farm that he claimed was spoiling his golfing experience. He's been a popular boogeyman ever since.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 02:10 PM
1

I'm not sure how any for-profit industry could resist the pull to be more inclusive of women. If a large part of your identity comprises, 'look at what I bought today', then you're an ideal customer. I'd love to see some demographic statistics for video game shops. Anecdotally, I've noticed that male customers are vastly outnumbered by the women - whereas the opposite was true a decade ago. I've also noticed that the number of actual games on the shelves have decreased, whereas accessories litte…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 10:01 PM
15

The curiosity's cool. I don't find tall, muscular, well-groomed, well-dressed, confident, successful men attractive - in that I want to have sex with them, but I am aware that these traits are attractive to people who do. My attraction to these people is social - in that I'd want to replicate their successes, and potentially be their friends.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 09:58 AM
165

It appears you've willfully blinded yourself to male attractiveness in an attempt to appear straight.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 05:47 AM
2

Yep, a bail-out (or bail-in) plan seems practical. Avoiding infected peoples' bodily fluids should be easy so long as you're not employed alongside the public. My fear is that enough people will remain in their jobs during a minor outbreak to become infected themselves and make it major.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 12:23 AM
1

It certainly could be like the bubonic plague returned. I wish the sub could have talked about the topic more thoroughly but it seems the thread has been downvoted. There's still no cure. There are a few promising leads - ZMapp has had a great deal of success in primates and may have also helped humans to recover, but it's still early days.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 12:11 AM
0

I suppose this depends on what ZaqRE meant by 'work'. If 'work' means successfully impressing a girl, I agree that the success rate would be pretty high because you'd have the girls who immediately gave you their numbers + the girls who were fooled. If 'work' means proving that girls operate largely on hypergamy, then the video creator's phrasing, "it took a couple of reactions" would imply that immediate success and various other mess-ups would never allow for a 7/10 identification of hypergamy…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 04:00 PM
11

In the comments, the video creator says: Not going to lie, it took a couple of reactions from different people to get one this good because either A) they gave their number and didn't reject me or B) it got awkward and I laughed. So it doesn't sound like it would be any more successful than 1/3.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 03:15 PM
1

Are you saying that would be a sign of idiocy? It would be a sign of consistency, surely?
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:19 PM
2

You're assuming a lot here, but it's certainly a theory. I'd appreciate a response from OP.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 11:14 AM
1

That's what I was thinking. There are also a few typically female jobs that have poor cultural capital (and salary) - cleaner, prostitute, receptionist etc.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 04:22 PM
3

The admins won't (and imo, shouldn't) do anything. It's the mods' responsibility to run a subreddit as their community sees fit.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:44 AM
5

I have trouble with such a rigid definition, especially in a subreddit pluralising the term 'feminism'. The assertion that, "If you cannot respect this goal then you need to re-evaluate why you want to participate here" just smacks of prescriptive, stifling abuse of mod privilege.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:42 AM
2

I guess the difference is that onenifty was joking.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 07:53 AM
2

If you want a wider subsection of Reddit's opinion, I'd suggest submitting this to /askreddit. This place can be pretty polarised, and I imagine you're receiving more sympathy than you normally would.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 09:41 AM
1

Okay, okay, I didn't mean to imply the subject itself is innocuous, just that I couldn't imagine it being a battlefield for the sexes. Mmm... battlefield for the sexes.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 06:25 PM
1

Sorry, would you mind elaborating on your point about reading skills? I'd never considered that there could be an inequality in such a seemingly innocuous subject.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 02:29 PM
3

I saw someone use the phrase in a similar thread a few days ago - were you that special someone?
/r/MensRights17/05/10 05:03 PM
1

Sorry it took so long to reply to your question - the discussion seems to have taken on a life of its own! My meaning was that, since its, "hard to build empires when you're considered property", and women have been considered property for the bulk of history over much of the face of our planet, then this reflects poorly on women in terms of their ability to negotiate an even-footing with men.
/r/MensRights20/01/10 06:55 PM
5

It takes Spaceman_Spliff to stumble across the elephant in the room.
/r/MensRights20/01/10 03:24 PM
1

Why on earth would this get downmodded? Excuse me while I weep.
/r/MensRights13/07/09 07:20 AM
4

It would have been more positive if she'd not bothered to lie in the first place.. but then it wouldn't be on the site.. I'm having trouble seizing the moral high-ground here - help a guy up will ya?
/r/MensRights07/07/09 04:02 AM
4

Stupid article and barely related to the title. You've made me into an angry man, fiveforfighting.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 04:40 PM
1

That makes sense, thanks.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 01:36 PM
1

Wow. That's really irritating to someone who assumes downvotes = an intellectual point of disagreement.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 10:38 AM
2

See, this post was downmodded for offering an explanation (although I assume in this case it was satirical). So perhaps if downmodders didn't have fear of being downmodded themselves, we'd see more explanations and perhaps less downmodders - their ire expressed in words rather than a click.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 10:35 AM
2

What does WBB stand for?
/r/MensRights18/03/09 04:43 PM
5

In the interests of equality, I declare pn6 both a dick and a twat.
/r/MensRights02/03/09 03:09 AM
2

I request details!
/r/MensRights02/03/09 02:18 AM
1

Same here. I'm a man btw.
/r/MensRights04/01/09 02:16 AM
2

Tracey Cox contributed the black penis data. Heh.
/r/MensRights07/11/08 03:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter