TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dublin_M4ledom Archive

View 4 posts and 189 comments by Dublin_M4ledom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Hidden behind paywall. Please post text of article with commentary in order to meet fair use law.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/08/21 11:21 AM
15

Another translation could be: " If you can't deal with my struggles and can't support me when I'm down, you don't deserve when im feeling great and have my shit together." I think it's very clearly implied that she isn't "down", but instead being abusive. Original quote:: "I'm selfish, impatient a a little insecure. I make mistakes, I am out of control and at times hard to handle. But if you can't handle me at my worst, then you sure as hell don't deserve me at my best." Selfish, impatient, inse…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:28 PM
2

I've been saying that since forever. They're all hardcore feminists. Like more than 90 per cent. Women in general are only 60 per cent feminist so there's a huge gap. Being horny and single makes a woman a feminist. That seems to be a fact.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 05:21 PM
1

Why was there any plea bargaining? How often does Idaho allow a male perp with multiple underage victims to cop a plea that keeps him off the register?
/r/MensRights10/12/20 11:07 AM
30

Best. Meanwhile a local university student just got arrested for extortion, after threatening to tell cops she was sexually assaulted if her victim didn't give her $1000. That's the problem with having a strict "no-consequences for perpetrators" policy for false accusations, like we have in the Western world. We know that amoral male criminals exist, so it shouldn't surprise us that the same is true of women, and we have no reason to assume that amoral women are any less common than amoral men, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/20 11:01 AM
32

Not quite: the argument made by the prosecutors is that by prosecuting liars, you scare genuine rape victims from coming forward. That's always been the excuse for not charging, here in Europe. Kinda weird when you consider that by the same argument, you shouldn't arrest people who burn down their businesses for insurance fraud: because arresting arsonists for making false reports might scare people whose businesses burned down because of a genuine accident from informing the authorities. Strang…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/20 10:52 AM
1

It is a very dangerous drug to give to an adolescent female, as it has the effect of sterilizing her. If a fully competent adult wants to destroy her chances of sexual function or children, that's her right. But why despise Keira Bell? That makes zero sense. She was given shoddy treatment by a clinic, she sued, she won. That's how the system is supposed to work. That's how clinics remain good, because they know they'll be sued if they fuck it up. If you went to a doctor and were given inappropri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/20 12:39 AM
0

Can you justify your expressed dislike of Ms Bell, who is obviously a victim of her own mental issues and a clinic ruled by feminists who thought nothing of handing out extremely dangerous medication to a minor, with no greater obstacle than three short sessions with a shrink who's under orders not to challenge her decision but merely to affirm Ms Bell that she'll always be a mam.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/20 11:55 PM
1

"Just as toxic" =/= "Just as reckless" Toxicity = the desire to kill Recklessness = the willingness to sacrifice your own personal safety to reach your goal There is exactly as much toxicity among women as men. FDS are much less likely to be physically reckless, in any circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 09:49 AM
2

How? Can you give an example? For clarity, I am thinking of a rule that says that all-male and all-female groups, which isolate themselves from the opposite sex, get to be bound by different laws which each sex votes on for itself. People who mix with the opposite sex live under universal law like now, where every mentally sorta-mature adult gets an equal vote on the law the applies to everyone, even if it can only affect one gender by the very laws of nature (such as laws about pregnancy or pro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/20 09:14 PM
7

Forget about the abortion question as such for a second (because we pretty much all agree with abortion being available, safe & legal, don't we?) and consider the idea that males are supposedly not supposed to make laws that affect non-males. What if we added that norm in general: women can't have a vote in anything concerning things that men do. At the moment, women have an influence in writing laws that govern what sports men can play, for example. If we applied this rule consistently, women c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/20 07:01 PM
1

True but 80% of the world lives with patriarchal traditionalism which teaches that men have to serve women by protecting, providing and siring their children. Yet all of those nations apart from the more extreme Muslim ones have feminist laws on the books, usually it's only isolated villages where women don't have full legal protections. Certainly both China and India enforce feminist law, and together they are a huge number. It's always the urban centres that modernise first, then, a generation…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 08:15 PM
1

what better way to support diversity than being the military protector of the worlds first feminist nation. You seem to be describing a nunnery. Those have existed for a long time. I don't think feminism is THAT invincible. 80% of the world lives without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 07:30 PM
6

Relationship counseling is not a human rights issue. Why is that the specific business of human rights activists? Do feminists teach their followers how to be more decent and honourable to men? I have not seen that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/20 04:10 PM
1

I made a claim that a decent number of men exist that think this way Oh, so you mean men whom you have never even met. Men whose thoughts you cannot know anything about, as you can't even see their body language or facial expression. The problem is the same: what's the source of your info? Telepathy?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/20 12:42 AM
0

You made a claim about a decent percentage of men you met personally, and you have provided zero evidence that your claims about their thought processes are true. Why not just admit it? Why not say "I can't read the minds of other people"? Why is that so hard? Don't try to switch the topic to your feelings. You made statements about the feelings of other people, not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 11:52 PM
0

Also, I'm asking you to back up your own statements about men who have looked at you. Specifically, the statements you made about the subjective inner minds of those men. You made those statements as if they were proven facts and when I challenge your claim, you start using video games as an example. How are video games proof of what's in the minds of the men who have looked at you? Do all of them work in the game design industry?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 10:55 PM
0

Ah yes, I should absolutely confirm, with 100% certainty, that every man who sits next to me on the bus and asks me if I'm single is thinking with his dick. Oh he may wish to fuck you, that's a given. But the claim that you know he only wants sex and not even friendship requires evidence. Or you could just retract the claim and say "yeah, to be honest I don't know if they did or didn't want to do non-sexual stuff with me". I want you to impress me with an unexpected display of honesty and health…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 10:41 PM
0

"Not ALL men only see you as something to fuck!" yeah, just a decent percentage OK so your claim is now that "just a decent percentage" of the men who have gazed at you are: > not interested in the fact that I'm a person, with a mind and thoughts as complex and nuanced as their own, but only see me as a body. An object, just a thing they can use to acheive orgasm and nothing more. Let's say 1000 men have looked at you in this way. You have given me very detailed claims about the thought processe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 10:02 PM
0

Being reduced to a means to an end. The understanding that they're not interested in the fact that I'm a person, with a mind and thoughts as complex and nuanced as their own, but only see me as a body. An object, just a thing they can use to acheive orgasm and nothing more. That's some impressive mind-reading there. If a guy looks at you with horniness, you somehow know that he wouldn't like you as a wife, gf or friend. How can you be so sure? I doubt you have actually had sex with every man who…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 09:02 PM
1

Women's stories are not told, seen, paid attention to, or valued You should start consuming western TV, movies, comics, videogames. An absolute majority of all those art forms is devoted to telling only women's stories from an avowedly feminist narrative. I notice you are writing in English, and the overwhelming majority of content in the English language is feminist as I described. How can you possibly have formed the opinion that "Women's stories are not told, seen, paid attention to, or value…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 08:57 PM
1

unweilding stare A stare that is not brandishing a weapon?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 08:52 PM
1

If you wish to understand all feminist literature, replace 'male' with 'fecal'. A gaze is a gaze. A male gaze is evil incarnate. If a man is gazing at some clouds, those clouds are being raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 08:50 PM
2

Ugly, hostile virgin women have *always* been in charge of the feminist movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/20 08:07 PM
1

But it's discrimination in favour of women. Men are totally fine with that, for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 02:08 AM
2

Regardless, he would appear to have nailed you down. The scholarships are obviously discriminatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 02:06 AM
2

Preferential treatment, or “we’re making a concerted effort to interview women and minorities.” You’re sure you were denied the job over a lesser qualified woman or minority? Or you just didn’t get the job? All indicators are that hires overwhelmingly go to female candidates regardless of academic ability. You can literally have your company closed down in Europe if you don't have a specific number of women in it at the top level. It's fine if all the shit-level jobs are for men. They don't play…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:58 AM
1

Can I ask in all seriousness? You talk about girls getting unearned advantages. Did you not ever see boys get unearned advantages? A handful of male athletes get unearned advantages. Virtually every woman who wants to go to college gets free money from the government to do so, money which is not available to males who identify as males. If you are pretending to claim that the two systems of unearned advantages are roughly equivalent, you can only be a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:43 AM
1

Exposing people to career options isn’t “forcing” them to do anything. Until feminism gives up this shitty type of rhetorical strategy, all intelligent people will continue to despise feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:39 AM
1

But there’s nothing wrong with saying we want to expose young women to possible careers in stem. That's a poor motte-and-bailey attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:38 AM
1

Presenting an accurate view of historical events is tearing down males? How so? That's very far from an honest response. It's extremely selective and blinkered.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:36 AM
1

male intelligence is precisely equal to female intelligence, although the distribution differs a little. Male distributions have fatter tails. The college admissions system is only useful to the extent that it accurately selects for ability. The college admissions system is massively favoring women, but there's zero evidence that female IQ has risen so high above males that this is justified. Evidence suggests that the system is rigged in women's favour, because we know for certain that high-abi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:29 AM
1

So the first half yes, women seek to extract resources. But I don't think the latter half makes any sense. A lot of the criminal examples aren't even punished by fines but jail time. So how is a woman "receiving resources" if men's behaviour is putting them in jail? It's not like they're getting a check That's pretty easy to understand once you realize that for most crimes, the criminal evades justice. Assuming these criminals are roughly as competent as others, you've gotta conclude that it's m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 01:01 AM
5

And yet... There's a bunch of single mothers running around. Odd isn't it? All of whom were knocked up by men being reckless about the lives they create.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/20 04:52 PM
1

We tend to approach sex more cautiously than men do because many times sex can end up being unfulfilling or even dangerous if we have it with the wrong person. Nice try, but the reason that women are more cautious is that eggs are extremely expensive and sperm is cheap. If every woman could have a million kids, women would probably be more reckless in mating choices. Sexual behavior is downstream of biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/20 04:51 PM
1

The "well at least you get sex" arguement has always just seemed bitter and a sign of lacking empathetic. If the logic above was true, then the kissless virgins among the femcels should be the happiest femcels, Because they have avoided the danger of some random drunkard cumming in them, as you describe. Yet, by all appearances, the kissless virgins seem to be far less happy than those femcels who have had sex and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/20 04:48 PM
1

. I think this sub might be good for me in terms of learning about what’s going on in the dating scene, I doubt it. Clear thinking is not too common on here, from what I have seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 12:56 PM
1

There's some very dark aspects of the human psyche on this site, this may be healthy for people who don't get triggered but if you are susceptible maybe staying on reddit is a bad idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 11:05 AM
1

Why are you still on reddit? Was exposure to all the hate beneficial?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 07:56 AM
1

Can you demonstrate how?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 09:20 AM
-2

We'll just colour you racist instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:36 PM
-1

Holy shit, LOL. How did you derive all that crap from his reply?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:35 PM
1

Remind me which hat to wear for this conversation It makes a difference what you mean by "men". Do you mean three guys on a corner or all 3 billion adult males? Can't discuss clearly if you don't specify.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:22 PM
0

I know you feel like you said something here That's because he did. You got pwnd, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:19 PM
0

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 12:18 PM
1

A cat. Better companion than you are Yeah, but if a person chooses to only be with cats instead of another human, maybe she's not the best possible companion either. The main losers are all the hundreds of cows killed to feed each house cat. Ecologically, it's a disaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:07 PM
3

Huge tits, excessive eyeliner, wears form-hugging clothes and obsessed with nails. Wolverine is pretty feminine. Not attractive, but extremely aggressive. Not the smartest. 100% femcel.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:01 PM
1

How the hell are men who cheat “high value”? In this context "high value male" means fuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:59 PM
0

You heard it here ladies. You’re just insecure if you worry about getting raped. Bullshit. Context is key. If you're not immediately accessible to unauthorised men, and are statistically among the safest people, worrying about rape is unreasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:56 PM
0

A cheating man is a low value man, unless the woman is desperate and afraid to be on her own, she will not voluntarily chose to be with a man who cheats. Yet, don't married men get flirted with more often?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:48 PM
0

"having CHOOSING to clean up after someone all the time" FT
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:39 PM
0

around the house that another adult also lives in Adult means that you're supposed to make your decisions with care. I think some women have developed a weird sense of entitlement. Men overwhelmingly prefer simple, low-maintenance house arrangements. Women tend to opt for high-maintenance arrangements, despite the fact that only 1 of the 2 adults wants an overcomplicated house. Imagine a husband obsessed with tennis, who insists that his wife play a set against him every morning and evening, or …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:37 PM
1

but NOT doing your fair share of the physical and emotional work definitely hits the brake. "The emotional work" is stupid fourth wave garbage. Men and women are scientifically proven to process emotions differently, and you do NOT know how any male should be processing emotions. You'd likely blow a gasket if any man told you what to feel. The same principle applies: if you don't like how a man processes emotions, date women instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:30 PM
1

Society unfortunately sees the value of women mainly for their looks. Yep, I'm in Europe and our economy is governed by a woman called Christine Lagarde. She was chosen because she's a 21 year-old lingerie model with beautiful perky tits, who knows nothing about finance. All that mattered when they were hiring her is "does she make the peepee hard?"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 01:26 PM
1

What's your evidence? Some buzzfeed listicles? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 01:23 PM
1

Incels have been named as a national terrorist threat by US authorities Riiiiiiight. I remember when the US authorities said Iraq had WMDs. If the US authorities declare the world is purple, I don't believe it until I see it. Incels are typically introverted so their hostility is ordinarily self-directed. It's only a rare outlier who acts out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 12:26 PM
0

That's total bullshit. Check out /r/antipinkpill/ for examples of how skeevy femcels get. Look beyond your thirst and you'll see that women are capable of as much nastiness as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 11:25 AM
2

Yeah, sure you would. You have heaps and heaps of boyfriends.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 01:48 PM
3

Sure you get thousands of matches 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 06:16 PM
8

Click on FDS poster's name, observe post history in femcel subreddits, repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 08:27 PM
2

FDS is just posting what all women do. Find the best man they can find and maximize resource extraction. Well it's certainly their revenge fantasy to do that. They don't extract anything because they remain untouched.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 07:05 PM
8

They don't date anyone, though. They are shut-ins. Their sex toys make excuses for not being with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 07:03 PM
29

Everyone who posts on FDS is a heavy poster on the femcel subreddits. The people of FDS will touch the surface of the moon before they touch a penis. It's a site for unattractive women to express their hatred for the people who rejected them, like most incel subreddits but with gender flipped.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 07:01 PM
2

Nobody's asking you to condemn the deceased, but they do want you to protest about the fact that a violent abuser is being painted as an innocent victim by living, breathing liars. We're asking you to criticize the living who are knowingly falsifying the facts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 06:13 PM
2

Johnny needs a group behind him, and a male centric one just doesn’t exist. Are you high? The whole men's rights movement on reddit is pushing the story hard. They exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 01:39 PM
1

If a men’s rights movement got behind Johnny Depp and started talking about it the way women rights groups got behind Amber Heard when they thought she was telling the truth his plight would get more attention Have you done a search for the Depp-Heard spat on reddit? Like damn near 100% of all the hits since the news of the tapes broke is from men's rights subs. If you go back to the time when it was Heard making bogus claims, the legbeard subreddits were boosting that signal hard. I see two pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 01:38 PM
1

Saw genuine hatred in your post history. Be well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 05:07 PM
6

it is NOT that women start looking for men to whom they are NOT sexually attracted to marry There are people who dispute this?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:56 PM
3

There's also the third category of "people whom you will passionately fuck when extremely drunk or tripping, but only then".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:55 PM
1

I didn't intend to hurt your feelings. Have a great day and maybe consider that when you spray hatred in all directions, getting a little sarcasm in reply is not the equivalent of the Holocaust.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:53 PM
2

Ironically, this is when you’ll have the healthiest relationships, when you’re secure in yourself. Reading your posts, I am struck by these thoughts: Here is a woman who's got it all figured out. She has a deep, insightful, reliable understanding of the male sex. Other women who take and follow her advice are certainly guaranteed to be immune from regret and recrimination. Ladies, follow her advice. You definitely won't be miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 04:45 PM
1

Those societies are shrinking aggressively in population. Even China's growth since Mao died is just a simple reversion to the pre-Mao economic norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 12:00 PM
1

Almost every male between 12 and 75 has sufficient sperm to make a baby with each woman on the planet. What was your question again?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 03:07 PM
25

I find 99% of talk about "masculinity" to be disingenuous and invariably a Trojan horse to push a poorly reasoned agenda that all of humanity's problems are the fault of men in North America, construed as a monolith. I don't agree with the idea of engaging with it as if it was sincere. It's garbage and the best possible thing you can do when confronted with it is simply to dismiss the speaker. By accepting their dishonest framing, you perpetuate the harm they cause.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/20 07:02 PM
2

Any girl down for casual wants the dick and will not use the words “no” or “stop” explicitly unless she’s being tickled or something. That's the thing: how would you know about women other than yourself? Even if you have personal experience of many threesomes, you're still only getting the information from women who are willing to try threesomes. I know for sure that I can't speak for men in general, how do women feel OK speaking for the rest of womankind?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 10:15 AM
0

Because that's inherent to the game. By perceiving everything in the world to be infinitely terrifying, everything a man does can be regarded as equivalent to rape. Even adjusting his own socks. If she feels threatened by it, it's basically the same as holding a knife to her throat.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 10:09 AM
9

Why do you have to leave? That's what I do when I am persistently sexually uncomfortable. It's weird to stay in that circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 10:05 AM
6

Just rephrase the same question with a single word change: "What do you view of the argument "Women are killed, harassed and stalked by blacks because they said "No" to them"?" See how it's easy to spot the immoral prejudice there? Let's go again: "What do you view of the argument "Women are killed, harassed and stalked by Muslims because they said "No" to them"? " With just a single word change, the inherent bigotry of the statement is clearly visible. Nobody chooses to be born black or raised …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/19 05:45 PM
3

Bipolar isn't specifically a violence related disease. If I gave the impression that women are a tiny minority of bipolars, that wasn't the intent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/19 05:26 PM
3

Yeah the diagnosis statistics indicate that men with these problems outnumber women, and it's highly heritable. However women certainly do suffer from these ailments too. One of the reasons why fewer women have it is because of the XX chromosome structure. If a man carries the gene for poor impulse control on one of his chromosomes, he'll grow up to have impulse control issues. But if a woman has it on only one of her chromosomes, it won't affect her. She will only be affected if the gene is pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/19 05:19 PM
2

Men are extremely variable, when benchmarked against women. We get many more genetic diseases and we also have higher rates of mental illness. Two of the mental illnesses that men are comparatively more genetically predisposed to is poor impulse control. Another is inappropriate hostility. The big lie smuggled into the feminist argument is that men are prone to these diseases because of "societal conditioning" Wrong. Societal conditions don't play much of a role. The driver of these unfortunate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/19 01:54 PM
2

not an automatic disqualification, but still showing a refusal to engage with the idea rather than a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 09:59 PM
1

Want to continue the conversation over DM?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 02:59 PM
1

Look, if your point is that red pill people are talking out of their arses as much as if not more than feminists, I already agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 02:19 PM
1

Also, what is the point of pursuing a relationship if women "hit the wall, and the wall is undefeated [...] some, even, hit the wall in their teens"? Somewhat pointless to ask me that question as I, like 99% of men, don't believe in "the wall". If even the guys that I would have considered to be good people, have this way of thinking about women, how can I trust any man? Okay, have unthinking distrust about half of your species. Let me know how much happiness that brings you in old age. You once…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 02:15 PM
1

guys that are willing to hit on us, aren't willing/capable to do I think I see the problem. If a hunter refuses to hunt, and will only eat those animals that present themselves to her, that hunter may have to content herself with less meat than hunters who hustle and make the effort to chase some meaty beasts. There's no substitute for putting in a bunch of effort. Yes, it's possible to get disheartened but the reward is a relationship when you catch the one worth keeping.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 12:30 PM
2

Exactly! I saw a post from a kissless virgin on /r/pinkpillfeminism/ about how prostitution isn't empowering. Whatever else you may think about the subject, the fact remains that some prostitutes have claimed it's empowering to them psychologically but this girl is comfortable telling her that she's wrong about what happened in her own mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:25 AM
1

I think I really needed the FDS to reprogram me from that state. Well, if so that means that the red pill gets to make the same argument, which "sads me", because I think that the red pill is a paranoid shit show, but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:22 AM
1

Yeah, and WGTOW only ever post about wholesome hobbies. They don't camp in male-bashing subreddits and point out deviant sex criminals and assert that the rapist is a perfect representative of manhood as a whole. I mean, in this dimension that's exactly what all WGTOW do, but in the world of Narnia they're much healthier.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:06 AM
3

You literally wrote out a big ad-hominem He attacked someone personally? Where? I saw him attack large subreddits, but that's very far from ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:02 AM
1

Well I don't wish to enact the emotional labour required to drag you out of your ignorance. You'll need to get educated by your own efforts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:31 PM
1

It's precisely what took place. When a kid asks to put an arm around your waist you say "I would rather not", unless you are scum, or you are OK wuth a child's arm around your waist. If you think anything else is justified you shouldn't be allowed near children.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:26 PM
1

Yes, it's entirely legitimate and your shaming tactics are morally foul.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:15 PM
1

hey can I touch you no not a misandrist Contrast your imaginary scenario with the actual situation in the OP: hey can I touch you in a completely normal and nonsexual way? no, and now I am going to subject you to a mentally unhinged political rant designed to play on your insecurities! the label "misandrist" fits remarkably well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:14 PM
1

Nasty ignorant bigotry is fascinating to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:16 PM
1

Some people are ignorant but pretend to speak from a place of knowledge. They'll often use words they don't understand, like "eviscerating".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:16 PM
1

It's an anime convention, average age is probably 15.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:14 PM
1

Creep is like "slut" or "unbeliever". A child chastely putting his arm around a waist of an adult is an innocent act. If that makes him a creep then I am very firmly on his side and I categorize the people seeking to shame him in the same box as pimps, thieves and swindlers. Those who would shame him are scum of the most pernicious type.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:37 PM
1

It's a deliberately malicious act designed to make innocent boys uncomfortable and feel shame despite having done nothing wrong. It's predatory behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:32 PM
1

men objectifying her, which she is certainly within her rights to No, it's immoral to deliberately dress to garner male attention and then abuse the males who give it to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:30 PM
0

Where she verbally abused a minor over some retarded bullshit propaganda she learned in a snowflake brainwashing facility.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:28 PM
1

Only in deeply false feminist propaganda. The actual number is one in 43 women, over an entire lifetime.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:26 PM
0

The preachy cosplayer in the anecdote is a child abuser and should do prison time for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:24 PM
1

I don’t see anything questionable there. She laid out her boundaries, and justified them It’s ok if she doesn’t want to be touched. It’s equally ok if the boob thing bothers her. She’s allowed to talk about her feelings Not if she's interacting with minors. If they're minors abd she's pulling that feminist bullshit with children, she should spend time in jail. Leave the bullying to adults who can handle it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:23 PM
0

Was the guy asking male cosplayers if he could put his hands on their waists None of your business. It's very seriously bigoted to imagine that that matters, morally.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:21 PM
1

She's a bigoted sadist and needs to be kept away from children.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:20 PM
1

That's the thing: there's nothing wrong with seeing a woman who deliberately costumes herself to look sexy as the object of sexual attention. It's what life is literally based on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:20 PM
1

It's none of her business what his intentions are, unless they harm her in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:18 PM
1

So with all that zoomer honesty why didn't they just ask to take a picture of her tits? Because they may prefer an unposed picture. If I walk around naked someplace, I have zero rights to get angry if people take pictures. If the actions of another person doesn't injure you or deprive you of money, you literally don't have any say in what they do. If they want to take a picture of you, they totally can. There's nothing morally wrong with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:17 PM
1

When you "take" a picture, you're not taking anything. It's a figure of speech. If you go anywhere in a costume, people are definitely doing nothing wrong if they take a picture. If you are camera shy, wearing a sexy costume and hanging around in front of sex-starved children means they're not the bad guy if your picture gets taken. If having pictures taken of you is a problem, ditch the sexy costume while you're visiting a con. There's absolutely nothing evil or wrong with that sentence and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:13 PM
1

Fortunately, no place on earth has a rape rate as high as that. If you believe that, you're literally as sexist and bigoted as any rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:09 PM
1

And you have convincingly lost the argument with such a pathetic, brain-dead rejoinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:07 PM
0

She can complain about it. She can go to Death Valley and complain about the heat, she can go to Niagara falls and complain about the wetness. She can go anywhere and complain about anything that is inevitably attached to the place she freely chose to go. She's free as air to make any idiotic complaints she wants, but if she wants to verbally abuse kids, I hope she's never invited back. When an adult woman is abusing children and you side with the adult, I know who the monster is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:05 PM
1

You don't have to parrot misandrist ideology to see sexy women come to your events. And there's zero shame in wanting to see sexy women at your events. If you feel any such shame, you are the victim of ideological brainwashing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:02 PM
1

So imagine you see a pretty woman in a costume and you ask her to be in a picture with you... and then you immediately take turn around pinch zoom in on her tits... right in front of her? That seem pretty gross to me. They didn't ask her for nudes or fap material did they? If you are going to be a non-obese young woman in revealing clothing in a room full of socially awkward virgins and you haven't made your peace with the fact that you're going to be wank fuel, you're a fool and/or a sadist. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:59 PM
1

This is why I'm so fascinated by the "truefemcel" sub. What did these women do in their late teens and 20s? Did they ever take the initiative to ask men out, approach them, get to know them? Or did they reject the small portion of men in their lives that were actually interested in them? Or maybe possibly they have some birth defects or major disabilities? I don't know but It is fascinating, isn't it. My current guess is that they are undiagnosed autists who are blissfully unaware of the men aro…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 07:57 PM
1

on the average and ugly side of things actually having more suitors overall than extremely pretty women You forget that men are more likely to take a chance where likelihood of success is low. This counters whatever tendency there is to focus on plain women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 02:59 PM
2

LOL someone has never been to Ireland!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 02:57 PM
1

So the fact that a lot of people do a specific thing is proof that those people are mentally healthy?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 06:16 PM
1

It's unlikely that anyone who is mentally sound would self-isolate. Self-isolation is a clear signal of mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 04:57 PM
1

Who said being a loser prevents mental illness? How did you get so bigoted?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 04:34 PM
2

Now you're telling me they are mentally ill. I bear no responsibility for anything anybody else has said about them. But if they're isolating themselves, yes, that is guaranteed to indicate mental illness for almost everyone who lives like that. Men love Capitalism except when it comes to dealing with the consequences of a Capitalistic society. Pull up your bootstraps and stop being a little bitch So because I have a dick, I must be a rabid Capitalist who supports everything anyone does in pursu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 04:30 PM
1

That is something you are choosing to do. A behavior. Something you have total and complete control over That's a fair point. It's also a fair point that the e-thot who falsely presents herself as a romantic prospect is abusing the vulnerability of a mentally ill human being who's incapable of seeing the reality that the abuser has zero romantic intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 04:00 PM
3

It was a rhetorical question. Patriarchy theory is pure tinfoil headwear.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 12:14 PM
1

Saying "men were lied to" makes it sound like there is some giant disinformation campaign being orchestrated against men with some deliberate intention and nefarious reason Isn't that the entire theory of Patriarchy? Are you saying Patriarchy is also bullshit, in the West? If not, there's a serious consistency problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 11:42 AM
0

I just assume that these guys have a fetish they haven't processed yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 11:40 AM
1

Okay so if society changes to the point where white women are the most marginalized, you'll no longer refuse to date women because of their skin colour? Or will you start to refuse to date women of the currently dominant colour family on the same principle as you refused to date whites? It would be a much less impressive sacrifice if it turns out that you just prefer the looks of people from the ethnicities you don't refuse to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 07:03 PM
0

I grew up with the “knowledge” that feminists were ugly, hairy, ungoldly whores Feminists have very little sex. Look at any subreddit devoted to sexually frustrated women and try to find one in a thousand who isn't a passionate feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 02:24 PM
3

All you need to post is hands and a keyboard. The internet doesn't filter out posts by virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 01:09 PM
1

The end goal for every poster on FDS is to be standing on a mountain of severed male heads, covered in blood, holding a machete.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 12:08 PM
1

And also calling for the culling of male fetuses. To you I wouldn't be surprised if that's totally normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 12:06 PM
2

just like men gasp. What do you know about what men like?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 12:02 PM
1

I didn't spot the 'a' before the '9' so I instantly thought I had come to a very very bad subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 11:57 AM
2

Women don't live for centuries. Stockholm syndrome only affects people with direct personal memories of events. If the memory is taken through a history book, it's not Stockholm syndrome. Italians don't have Stockholm syndrome about the barbarian invasions of Rome because all the people with memories of those events are dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 11:54 AM
1

Hey, have some compassion: if you were repulsive to the opposite sex, you'd have the same delusions as the women on that subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 11:20 AM
2

It's a subreddit made by and for women who have never and never will touch a man. Which revolves around fantasies of making men dance like marionettes to their feminine wiles. It's a demonstration that where sexual frustration takes hold of a woman of below average intelligence, feminism will not lag far behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 11:17 AM
1

Errr, "entitled" isn't an objective value. If someone thinks a thing is entitled, it is, to her. It's in the eye of the beholder.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 04:25 PM
1

Participate with an open mind and show openness to consider opposing views or it's going to have to come down. That's not a good rule. I prefer debates where each side proposes its own point of view with zeal. It's the reader's job to be open minded. Think of the readers as a jury and the two sides as prosecutors and defence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 04:23 PM
1

Property is ten thousand years old. It's likely that the old men banging young chicks 10,000 years ago were the leaders of a confederation of tribes who had conquered a large new territory. There's plenty of instances in recorded history where chieftains marry hundreds of young women as a form of political alliance. Once the girl marries the chieftain, the chieftain has to provide military protection to her extended family. Of course these women were being pressured to marry the old men. Most of…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 06:39 PM
1

And men who act on this should be put to death What about women who act on it? Why do they need to get a pass?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 03:13 PM
2

It's a trick question. If you are attracted to a person, there's literally nothing you can do to not feel attracted. You can of course, choose not to ACT on the attraction. If a pedophile sees a child and feels horny, she's not doing anything wrong until she acts to do something with the child. If she doesn't do anything to the child, no harm has been done, and based on the principle of no harm no foul, she's not in the wrong. Obviously we all feel creeped out by an adult getting turned on by a …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 03:11 PM
1

I said you've made inappropriate comments about young girls in the past. That's insinuating that he's a pedo, which has gotten innocent men killed. You have no moral standing to criticize anyone about anything if you're sleazily smearing people as sex criminals (with or without a bullshit piece of arse-coverage like the ambiguous word inappropriate) without serious evidence to back it up. You're just using the insinuation to smear people who disagree with your ideological commitments.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 01:46 PM
1

Men will say absolutely anything if they think they can fuck a teenager Because lesbians are totally chill about the opportunity to fuck a hot young gal. I remember a les friend of mine who totally lost her cool around a hot young bi person who was talking with the group. And totally uninterested in my friend's thirtysomething boob sag. Kidding her about it later my friend said "God loves a trier!". I think we'd all have high-fived her if she'd managed to lick that spoon.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 02:07 PM
1

people live their lives according to what they want, not what you want Username checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 02:01 PM
1

Right, I'm off to start pestering women at the local university. Thanks for the tip.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 02:01 PM
3

Actually, just to piss you off, I have decided that OP being allowed to bang young ladies is the most urgent issue on Earth. Impeachment? Climate change? Fuck off! First we get OP some 16year-old poontang, then we look at secondary issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 01:59 PM
1

Probably because before the discovery of penicillin, STDs were fatal so unfaithful men and their wives died early and left their children orphans. So the cultural expectation was for fidelity. And some men who otherwise would have cheated probably decided that a syphilis death just isn't worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 06:31 PM
1

I'd say that the belief that cum shots and anal are part and parcel is kinda messing up people in regards to making out is effecting people of all sexes This really shouldn't be an issue for anybody who isn't mentally subnormal. The people in porn are highly skilled professional performers and only extremely stupid people would think "oh that's how everyone does it" No, it's how performers do it while performing. Everyone knows that. Porn is interesting because it's not what sex is like in reali…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 11:31 AM
1

Porn seems to have given you the idea that women want fantasies to become reality. If the fantasy is worth fantasizing about, it would probably be something desirable. Do people fantasize about eating a poorly cooked and ill-presented meal? So you are accusing people of fantasizing about things that they would enjoy doing in reality, given a consenting partner. Does that really seem so terrible?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 11:27 AM
1

Nothing they're saying on there is particularly outlandish They're generalizing about men saying they're all or virtually all paedophile rapists and incapable of love. If you don't find that outlandish I'm afraid most would find you outlandish.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 08:56 AM
1

They're very firmly in favor of having a career and valuing it above relationships. Literally every single poster on that subreddit is a kissless virgin and will die that way. It's hilarious to read it with that in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 01:15 PM
1

Men should be trying to fuck as many of them with as little commitment or money as possible. This is war It may take dozens of generations but ultimately the outcome of that "war" mindset can only have one form: the majority of men banding together to enforce access to women and using violence to guarantee the outcome. That's kind of how all wars work out. The side that is best at banding together wins. I am not a fan of the above outcome. I think humanity can do better without the war mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 05:33 PM
1

It doesn't seem to me that the majority of men wank to slobby, flat assed and flat chested, cylinder shaped, no make up, shitty hair, granny dressed women. Interesting hypothesis. You may be right, but how to be sure? We'll need some volunteers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 06:10 PM
1

Military conscription is a pretty new phenomenon. The American revolution was fought by volunteer soldiers on both sides. Conscription produces very low quality soldiers. For most of history since the renaissance, most men haven't been soldiers unless they want to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 06:22 PM
2

Splits open his enemy's skull with a broad-axe. Apparently there are other signifiers of alpha status but they are much too subtle for my sensors to detect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 02:30 PM
1

Think of it like a sandwich. Imagine a really appetizing sandwich. Now imagine the same sandwich after a person who can be trusted has informed you that another man has made love to the sandwich. Are you still as enthused about the sandwich?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 02:28 PM
1

There's a spectrum of actions I view as OK in that situation, going from subduing the guy until the police arrive and kicking his arse and breaking some bones. I am pretty sure that ripping off a body part is well beyond what can be considered.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:17 PM
1

It's a bit easier to determine whether a person has been mutilated than if they have been raped. A vagina that has just had consensual sex is usually difficult to distinguish from a vagina that has just been raped. Absence of consent doesn't leave fingerprints. So the "alleged" is more suitable for the claimed rape than the mutilation. There's just so much more reasonable doubt about the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:11 PM
1

try to rape your wife is not about Men's Rights What is our source that he was trying to rape anybody? If you are in a position to rip off a dick, you are probably also able to stop the rape or attempted rape without mutilation. I can't think of many situations where mutilation is a reasonable course of action, compared with just a heavy beating. Even assuming that there's zero doubt that it's a rape in progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:06 PM
2

And the idea reported you to Human Resources
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 10:59 AM
1

If you don't have some capacity for sympathy for such people, I assume you get your kicks torturing animals to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 04:27 PM
1

That still sounds like a poor basis from which to criticize others. We are what random chance made us. If we fall short of some arbitrary ideal I don't think that is a cause for shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 04:25 PM
1

(a certain portion of humanity) are garbage This is literally Nazi ideology. I am amazed that someone with such morally depraved beliefs has the gall to preach at others. You've got a despicable view of human value, yet you dare to moralise to others
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 03:44 PM
1

Femcels say this about themselves, that they get unusual levels of hate. I don't think that it's accurate. I think they're magnifying incidents from their life and giving them more importance than reality will bear out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 06:06 AM
3

Some of the ladies I chat with on reddit like to write cum dumpster on their breasts with lipstick. YMMV
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:22 PM
0

OP is Zarna Joshi and I claim my reward. My humongous reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:20 PM
2

On a jury, your vacant face supports the rapist. This person is a few sandwiches short of a lunch box. Avoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:19 PM
4

That's total crap. Researchers have staged incidents of sexual and physical assault and male bystanders always intervene very quickly, often violently. You're living in a fantasy world if you think regular men will tolerate that stuff happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:18 PM
0

Are you receiving instructions through the fillings in your teeth?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:15 PM
1

LOL!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:10 PM
0

Maybe she can show you where I am a rapist too. If she can make an accusation with no support, why can't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:06 PM
1

Also, it's not even my biggest kink. Just a relatively new one. In the kink world you play a lot of different roles (doctor, teacher, police officer, criminal etc) over a lifetime so misogynist is just a new thing to pretend to be. I presume it's the primal predatory aspects of the mammal species coming to the fore in my subconscious and mixing in obscure ways with my libido. If I could be more detailed about it then it would be conscious. I'm not a sociopath so the only way I am comfortable wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 03:04 PM
4

You eat babies, stop typing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:47 PM
2

You meaning your fellow femcel moderators. I was banned from the subreddit where men are permitted. It's also a fact that any femcel who participated in FWH were threatened with a ban from both subreddits. Are you requiring the screencaps or are you happy to "just remember" it happened?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:44 PM
1

most of the male hating is directed at ugly guys with supposedly high standards FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:42 PM
2

Make some effort to talk to femcels and you'll see that a lot of them aren't evil feminists I did make an effort to have a dialogue. My reward was a ban. Not only that, but you openly announced that you would ban any femcel who participated in femcels without hate. You want to be a censor, go on and be a censor. But don't pretend to also be open to dialogue. It's one path or the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:39 PM
2

I tried to help set up an online space for non-misandrist femcels. It was as bad a flop as a STEM table at a feminist convention. Two volunteers out of tens of thousands of femcels.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:37 PM
1

Do you know the difference between a consensual kink with well-defined scenes and real hatred? One is a game and the other is a serious mental illness. Yeah I am into playing a predator with consenting adult partners. But the real thing repels me no less than it repels you. Sex games and real life aren't the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:35 PM
5

a lot of them aren't misandrists Can you even link ONE femcel who expresses a lack of misandry, LOL?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:32 PM
2

That is pretty OK with me. The only problem I have with Jewish people is the silly clothing that Orthodox types wear. And frankly it's not a big problem for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 11:51 AM
2

Misogynist thinking is extremely dangerous if you are taking it seriously. If you are just pretending, say for BDSM purposes, that's fine. But if you are really talking yourself into hating women, that's bad news. Unless you are really old, you're already stronger than most women. I watched that Ted Bundy thing on Netflix and I'm pretty sure that misogyny was not a good thing for him. It sure as hell was terrible for his victims, but he got raped in jail, then fried. He'd be alive today if he wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 05:18 PM
0

or “femcels” even come here. Uh, this is pretty much the biggest femcel hangout spot that isn't directly aimed at "pink pill feminism". It's crawling with femcels. I mean I'm not a huge expert on what this subreddit is about, but pink and purple are pretty close colours.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 04:59 PM
1

And people seem to take huge issue with that aspect of feminism Shouldn't they? Is it a good aspect of feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 04:56 PM
3

that spent a lot of time going on about how awful men are was necessary I see you're using the past tense there. Why? Are feminists all sweet as cherry pie to men nowadays? I hadn't noticed that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 11:16 AM
5

How often do you call out the same behaviour when it's done by women against men. Examples are radical feminists and femcels. If the truthful answer is never or rarely, then your even-handedness is in doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 11:15 AM
1

Femcels seem to think something similar. They're full of stupid retarded statements like "men only can love hot women" despite the fact that hundreds of morbidly obese women get married every day. The evidence that men routinely love extremely ugly women is so overwhelming, so obvious, but they keep on repeating the mantra "men only like good looking women, it can't be my shitty personality" in a weird attempt to convince their unconscious that they're drinking yummy lemonade when it's really pi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 10:46 AM
1

Well, if it's not previously understood and agreed to be a purely sexual matter, and if I think it's possible the woman will want something more, I think "I wonder if her personality/mind is good enough for a relationship?" I have literally never dumped a woman for her looks. I have relatively organized sexual arrangements with women from time to time where the boundaries are very clearly delineated, but I also engage in regular civilian sex where, often, the woman wants a relationship. If I am …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 06:52 PM
2

The femcels are obsessing over this thread like it's the Rosetta stone. Every fucking day thousands of extremely ugly women marry happy men but these crazy women are so far down the self pity rabbit hole that they honestly believe that looks are their problem
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 06:19 PM
1

Well, femcel subreddits are not run by bots but they unironically repeat all the sexist anti-boy propaganda. It's not like you have to search hard for non-bots spouting hatred against all males.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy21/07/19 06:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter