TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DueContract6917 Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by DueContract6917 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 04:10 PM
2

I refuted your argument cleanly. If you cannot argue with words presented to you, stick to children’s activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 04:05 PM
1

You just ceded the argument. You do it because you want to get something out of it: better treatment. I’ve never seen someone so dumb lose an argument quite that quickly. Like a cow led to slaughter. Embarrassing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 04:05 PM
2

That is how human relationships work. People do things for others because they feel good when they do. Clearly your brain is under-developed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 04:04 PM
1

Since you aren’t intelligent enough to argue with what I said, and displayed the exact behaviors I predicted in addition, I’ll accept your concession. Stick to coloring books if you aren’t capable of using logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 04:03 PM
1

Okay. So the men you fuck are exclusively dicks, right? They all did things for you and treated you in a way that would get them sex, which means they are not nice. By your definition. Which means your argument is self defeating: nice guys being nice should not be a problem for them, since you admit to exclusively fucking men that are not nice. So if nice guys are also not nice, there should be no issue. But there is, which means there are only two possibilities: Your attraction to men is entire…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:20 PM
0

“us”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:07 PM
5

No, being nice is not a “baseline.” Criminals, abusers, and literal sex offenders do better with women than nice guys. But women know how bad that fact makes them look, so they have to fabricate a nonsensical cultural narrative that “nice guys” are secretly worse than John Wayne Gacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:05 PM
5

There it is. The conceit that anyone who does things for you is just an amoral psychopath that would make Machiavelli blush. Nothing is more disgusting to a woman than a man who lets himself be strung along while subsequently having the gall to expect anything in return for his time and attention. One sentence counterpoint: if these nice guys were really just amoral tricksters, they would adapt their strategy to be the typical loud, attention whoring clowns that women lust for. The only differen…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:03 PM
0

Women on dating apps are egregiously objectifying of men. It’s less heinous once you’re someone they have to interact with in person. But there’s a reason incel rhetoric has become normalized with zoomers. Nothing radicalizes a man against women quite like having to date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 02:59 PM
0

Sure you are. You want the feeling of being a good person. That dopamine hit is your reward. You get it from them whether they consent to it or not. This is basic philosophy. Try not to be so ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 02:57 PM
1

My sides. It’s women that insist on their love and attention having a price. Men know better than to ever expect actual love from a woman that isn’t their mother. The only men that can earn undying affection from women are generally serial killers and A-list celebrities. Women are mate copying sheep.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 02:56 PM
5

“Nice guys” have always been a convenient scapegoat for women to offload the cognitive burden for their bad decisions regarding men. There’s a reason “nice guy” is a pejorative while “bad boy” remains an ameliorative. Women are not attracted to pro-social men. Dark triad personality traits reign supreme. Men with criminal histories do better with women than literal MIT graduates. There is nothing more lethal to a man’s success with women than being “boring but stable.” Women would rather fuck a …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 02:54 PM
-5

You're more likely to like someone the more you get to know them No. Most people show themselves to be weak and unprincipled from prolonged exposure. Women in particular have nothing resembling consistent principles. They operate solely off pragmatic self-interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 12:54 PM
0

Objectification is specifically about not caring how the "object of your affections" feels. No, it is not. This is woman-brained solipsism about how it’s not really objectification when the guy you like tosses you around like a rag doll, puts a leash on you, or slaps you around in bed. Women LOVE to be objectified. That doesn’t make it “not objectification.” It does make women impossible to respect, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:21 AM
-1

You’re conflating “men they already like” with “men they’ve gotten to know.” Women are shallow and develop strong, heated reactions to men that sufficiently pass their thresholds for being hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:18 AM
-6

Yes, women are cowards and enjoy signaling interest indirectly. Woman-brained men love this, too, because they’re not really men. But it’s effectively the same thing. No one is confused about why a random man approached a random woman in public. It’s the pretense and the grand lie that it could be anything other than a request for sex that low IQ women latch onto.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter