TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Due_Author350 Archive

View 0 posts and 140 comments by Due_Author350 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Let's take a step back and revisit my original point. emotional intelligence isn't going to do anything if you don't have the looks, height, money and social status that women want. EI will help an existing relationship last, it won't help in attracting women. I meant this in a very literal sense. Almost all women will have some base threshold for all of these factors, which will be different for different women. If you don't meet their requirement in any of these, you might be extremely emotion…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 10:49 AM
2

Were you high when you wrote this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 05:21 AM
2

Somewhere between 5’8” Ideally, he would be athletic. Not super muscular, but lean and in shape What's the height below which you would never date? Is it a dealbreaker to you if he has a bit of flab (not obese)?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 07:36 PM
8

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:58 PM
46

Nobody should lie about their height/weight or anything else on dating apps. It's plain shitty behavior, you'll end up wasting your and your date's time. And why do you even want someone who would reject you for your height or weight? It just makes no sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 01:22 PM
1

I'm not "telling myself" anything, I'm simply stating facts. Look around and see how many good looking women are with very average guys. And no, it's not because they're rich. It's because they're interesting people to be with. There are certainly good-looking women dating average men, and good-looking men dating average women. It's one thing if you're in school or college or otherwise young and have a social circle of mostly single people. In such situations, people just spend time with and get…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:59 AM
1

And how would you know how much or how little emotional intelligence I have? You don't know the first thing about me. What even is your point? That EI helps men attract women? If you don't have the superficial attributes she desires to begin with, why would she even talk to you to find out if you're emotionally intelligent or not? It's ironic coming from an FDS kween, given how much y'all are obsessed with the 666 standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 07:07 AM
2

Emotional intelligence is VERY attractive for a good portion of women If a man doesn't have the superficial attributes I mentioned, none of these women will even give him the time of day to find out whether he's emotionally intelligent or not. So my point stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:45 AM
6

Only those hard, physical traits will keep her attracted and emotionally happy Attracted yes, emotionally happy no. EI is very important in ensuring a relationship is long-lasting, that doesn't mean the other things aren't important.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 08:29 PM
14

If you want to attract and retain high quality women The ONE thing that men must progress on for a satisfying marriage or dating life is to up your emotional intelligence. It's really that simple. No it really isn't, emotional intelligence isn't going to do anything if you don't have the looks, height, money and social status that women want. EI will help an existing relationship last, it won't help in attracting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 07:32 PM
–

If you didn't believe that men and women are unequal (and by this I mean are treated unequally by society at large), why would you find it necessary to mention those preferences? "Believing in women's equality" would be the default behavior of every man, and misogyny would be as much of a problem as misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 12:03 AM
–

Same reason some guys like feet. Again, completely false equivalence. There is no hierarchy that dictates men should like feet. There is a hierarchy that dictates women should be smaller than men (among many other ways in which they should be inferior to men). Also, everyone has feet. If you had said men who like feet like a particular kind of feet that are considered feminine, you'd be a little closer to an actual argument. I did that? Where? Your "preferences" state "Believe in women's equalit…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:38 PM
–

Already responded to someone else bringing up the same point, please scroll down.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:30 PM
–

My preference for taller is purely because I like the physiological difference, not because of masculine feminine patriarchy mumbo jumbo. And why do you like the "physiological difference"? Does being smaller than your man not make you feel feminine? Does the idea of being with a shorter man not make you feel masculine (and hence undesirable)? Harping on about testosterone/estrogen/ovaries/uterus is simply absurd and I don't have the energy to explain again why. You sound like a biological essen…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:10 PM
–

AWALT obviously doesn't mean 100% of women are like that, it means an overwhelming majority are like that. At least that's what they claim, which is actually false.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:01 PM
–

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/534335#:\~:text=The%20two%20sexes%20are%20differentiated,males%20typically%20have%20XY%20chromosomes. Does not mention cellular differences. Never denied biological differences. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology#:~:text=Males%20on%20average%20are%20more,mindedness%20(e.g.%2C%20nurturance). Wikipedia? Really? Even so, I didn't say there were no psychological differences, I said they weren't nearly enough as you red pillers claim…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:59 PM
–

What would be a different way that describes how you think people assess each other? That all the important attributes to that person have a minimum number of points that must be present in another person in order to date them. Having points above that threshold in one attribute doesn't compensate for having less points than the threshold against another.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:51 PM
–

False equivalence (and an absurd argument). The irony here is that while you believe in equality of the genders, you still tie height to notions of masculinity and femininity, which are constructs under patriarchy that, as you should be aware, promote the idea that women are less than men. Having ovaries (or not) is a purely physiological difference between males and females, not tied to any notions under patriarchy that oppress women. And trans men, who are men, have them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:33 PM
–

Inner sexual dynamics-difference how men and women are different on a psychological,biological,cellular level There aren't nearly as many psychological differences between men and women as you red pillers claim. And no difference on a cellular level. Yea they do since nice guys exist for a reason Again "niceguys" do not believe women will like them for who they are. Some may, others may not, but this is not the defining feature of a niceguy. I've mentioned already what constitutes a niceguy. See…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:24 PM
–

I've definitely seen many more proponents of AWALT than otherwise, but I'm not an authority on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:08 PM
–

It's a problem in the sense it creates a false reality of how inner sexual dynamics works between men and women What are "inner sexual dynamics" and how does it create a "false reality"? The thought process of thinking women will just naturally like for who you are not what benefit you add in their lives Hardly any men actually believe this. They themselves are looking for a partner who will add value to their lives. This doesn't logically follow from being hopeful/optimistic regardless of your …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:05 PM
–

TRP believes in AWALT. If there's sarcasm here I'm not getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:44 PM
–

And why is that a problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:42 PM
–

There's little difference in terms of self-improvement advice between the "blue side" and "red side", the main difference is in how they view women (and men) and how they should approach and treat women in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:40 PM
–

some trpers believe women reward strong behavior (even if bad) and 'punish/dismiss' weak emotional men , some of them even insist that the women are laughing at the victim(s) of the bully while sleeping with him , so why didn't this woman do that and in fact did the exact opposite ? There are some women who think like this and others who don't. The woman in the post you linked happens to be one of those who doesn't. broke up with him after humiliating him in the exact same ways he used to bully …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:34 PM
–

This would be true only if they thought the way you do, "distributing points across attributes". Not everyone thinks in this manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:22 PM
–

Ok. I was curious because I'm most of the things in your list except the taller bit (most probably). I know there are other women looking for men with these personality traits, I can only hope some of them would be ok with a man my height. You ever played those role playing games where you get a set number of points you can assign to different attributes? Yup, obsessively. I personally wouldn't want to be with someone who felt I needed to compensate for my height with something else though, it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:14 PM
–

There's a difference between "niceness" and kindness. I'm not nice quite often, but I'd like to think I'm kind most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 08:23 PM
–

Let's say he's all of these things except has a little extra flab and is an inch shorter than you. Would you still be interested in such a man? Honest question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 08:20 PM
1

Where did I say it was?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 03:07 PM
1

How do you know what my standards are? The way you've judged the looks of both women whose pictures you linked tells me everything I need to know about your standards. When I used to go out or party in gender mixed settings You do realize teenaged party boys don't really represent a cross-section of straight men in broader society right? were ignored by men who were on a similar level. Are you sure they were on a similar "level"? You'd be surprised at how many people I've heard calling her avera…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 03:00 PM
1

Answer the question. And how is acknowledging the importance of appearances in dating equivalent to being "whiny"? Care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 07:06 AM
1

There is no single "American culture", what you have is a multitude of different cultures that immigrant groups hold on to. My point was that there's a tendency to see white European Christian immigrants as more "American" than those that don't fit these criteria. if americans Who are these "Americans"? About 60% of the US population today is white. That's not a huge majority. multiculturalism reigns supreme in the modern world Nowhere more than in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:54 AM
1

You do know that America has been a country of immigrants right from the start? Irish-American culture isn't more American than Indian-American culture simply because the latter aren't white European Christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:40 AM
2

I don't have "insecurities". Nothing I said can be construed by any rational person as "I have insecurities". You're literally reading what you want to read. I was simply acknowledging reality. You might want to try that, it's better than being delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:06 AM
2

I also said most men don't like conventionally unattractive women Conveniently left that part out. most people will never be attracted to them This applies to both genders. Are you denying that being conventionally attractive (or not) is a huge determining factor in how many people are willing to date you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:05 AM
2

but there is no way this woman is desirable by looks alone according to conventional standards What are you talking about? She might not be "Chad's" first choice, but most men would definitely consider her attractive enough to approach. You're projecting your own incredibly high standards on to men. Most of us really aren't that picky about looks. And since when did Nina Dobrev become a "girl next door"? She's many notches above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:01 AM
7

"but muh facial structure! Muh HEIGHT!" Meaning what? That women will suddenly stop caring about height and facial structure if we wear outdated clothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 11:48 PM
3

either indian, asian or muslims These are highly overlapping categories. The first victim will be the culture. Whatever do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 11:41 PM
13

Acknowledging facts isn't "complaining". Most women don't like conventionally unattractive men, most men don't like conventionally unattractive women. "Getting out of their own way" and "making changes" isn't going to do shit for either group, most people will never be attracted to them. I don't get what you're fussing about here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 11:37 PM
1

Dating is a numbers game. Doing hobbies and social groups that are most authentic won't often put you in reach of enough women to be successful. This is just a weird statement. Before OLD, this is exactly how most people dated. Most people found partners. I'm pretty sure it still works better than OLD. Swiping through hundreds of profiles on an app doesn't necessarily mean your chances of finding a partner is higher. I think women are attracted to a certain kind of self improvement, not necessar…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 11:17 PM
1

Everyone's shallow in some way or the other, it's a question of degrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 07:21 AM
1

That's absolutely spot on. Why do you think this is poor advice and where is your evidence that it "consistently doesn't work"?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 07:18 AM
3

What is the blue pill "prescription" to win women's favor according to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:16 PM
1

Yes, that's literally what I said. This isn't a new idea for any man who's been around women long enough and observed their behavior. We know very well that women are just as picky about looks as men are. There's a narrative in "normie" spaces that even if you're an unattractive man you can compensate for it by being smart, funny, kind etc. A LOT of women pretend this is the case and even call you an incel if you say otherwise. So I felt it was important to mention that this isn't the case, none…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 05:21 AM
11

The thing is if you don't have looks, women don't want to know any more about you. Looks are a screening criterion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 04:17 PM
–

It's obvious that the question is "how can a guy you already find attractive be even more attractive". None of the answers apply to men they don't find attractive in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 07:00 PM
2

Yeah, I don't understand why so many people aren't getting this. Making her feel safe doesn't mean not hurting her, it means being able to protect her from other men. That's why they either want men who are tall and strong, or someone who has high social status whom no one else will mess with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 06:39 PM
–

That was a different era, women would choose partners based on their ability to provide more than anything else. I don't know if this applies specifically to your grandparents, but it does hold true for people of that time, generally speaking. We've come a long since then, mostly in the right direction. That obviously means men like me who are financially in a decent place but don't meet societal beauty standards don't get picked by most women. Which is far better than what it was before. Just t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 11:09 AM
–

How short were these "short guys" exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 09:42 PM
–

You may be right about some men, but women in general do care very much about height. Also depends on what exactly we mean by "short". At 5'2", I've more or less resigned to remaining single for the rest of my life. It's too much trouble to try to find the handful of unicorns who'd be willing to be with a man my height. Might as well divert my energy to something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 09:41 PM
1

Link the study please. Spurious correlation is possible in a single study, there have been other studies done that showed weak correlation and some that showed no correlation. Basically if you assume that a taller man has a longer erect penis than a shorter man simply because he's taller, you'll be wrong a lot of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:37 PM
1

Taller men usually have an average dick which to the ratio of their height, is bigger than shorter men’s an average. Untrue, there's only a very weak correlation. So weak that you relly can't rely on it at all. Do educate yourself on male anatomy rather than spread misinformation online.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 08:23 AM
–

Obviously far more women would prefer taller men with "healthy" BMI, that doesn't prove "all women find the same things attractive".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 05:03 PM
–

They don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:26 PM
2

I have no idea what this means.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 10:45 AM
1

All lottery tickets are the same and can be substituted for each other. All women are not the same and can't be substituted. Your analogy is fundamentally flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 07:48 AM
1

They were almost all overweight, a lot of them had low-key drug or alcohol issues, and one of them had previously attempted chop suey multiple times. Ok, and your point is that men with all these issues don't date women? Because that isn't the case at all. Just a visit to the mall is enough disprove your theory that overweight men can't get into relationships. Only like 7% of women do so, actually. And where did you pull this number out from? No, the fact that significantly more men are single t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 07:23 AM
1

If they want to be single, women literally have to make a deliberate decision to be single. I can't believe this is somehow news to you. And how attractive were these women? Were they overweight, unemployable and suffering from debilitating mental health issues like your first "ex-friend"? Because if they're not, they don't serve as examples of your initial assertion i.e. even unattractive women have hordes of men throwing themselves at them for committed relationships. And yeah, it is news to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 07:30 PM
1

This is so far removed from reality I don't even know where to begin. One ex-friend of yours doesn't represent all women. We can always find exceptions if we look for them, that doesn't make them the norm. It's as easy/difficult for the average woman to get into a relationship than it is for the average man. Note relationship doesn't equal casual sex (which is obviously easier for women to get, if that's all they're looking for). You would absolutely really be shocked I am, by the fact that ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 04:25 PM
1

They will when it comes to snagging decent men and staying in relationships with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 04:08 PM
3

If you are not able to take care of yourself, have a lot of emotional struggles you haven’t processed and you don’t know how to do basic household chores; you should maybe figure that out first. This applies just as much to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 09:35 AM
2

These are false equivalences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 09:16 AM
8

because a person can prefer a traditional culture while still occasionally taking advantage of our modern dating culture as well Yes, they're called hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:12 AM
1

Those who pretend this exchange does not exist are largely inexperienced and idealistic And there are those like myself who recognize this exchange exists because that's how traditional gender roles have been defined in the past and as a society we still haven't moved completely past them. We also recgonize that we've made considerable strides in that direction however - there are plenty of feminist women (and men) these days who choose partners not based solely on such traditional criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:09 AM
2

Adding that the same woman might want to be dominant at times and submissive at other times. People don't always want one thing. The red pill isn't about dating or sleeping with dominant women because red pill men don't see them as desirable, so they might predict women who like you will be submissive in bed This is more about projecting how they want women who are attracted to men to behave, rather than how women actually behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:05 AM
2

No. Gender roles aren't going away any time soon, there will continue to be women who want a wealthy man to provide for her (and men who want submissive women who stay at home and look after their children). Social media has just given them a platform so you see them more. There's nothing more to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 07:58 AM
3

This. Also the same woman can express her sexuality differently at different points in time. Some people like variety. However Redpill/Blackpill ideologies state instead that if a woman finds you attractive she'll act more submissively This is exactly why Redpill/Blackpill ideology is removed from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 07:55 AM
–

Porn isn't reality my friend. Women in porn are putting on a show for their audience because that's what they're paid to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 05:57 AM
1

Which was precisely my point. If the sarcasm is directed towards me, it's misplaced.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 09:20 PM
-2

Are you a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 07:57 PM
1

What in God's name is "monkey branching"?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 07:53 PM
1

I’m saying you’ll have better luck with a woman if you’re already in her social circle/ hangout with her friends. Then you’ll have a better chance of her wanting to get to know you. I mean if her friends like you as a person then you must be alright, right? This generally holds true for anyone, not just "pretty girls".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 07:52 PM
4

Why you should care? Because the manosphere is big now and a few domestic terrorists linked to it is all they need to try and censor it. I have to ask, are you only trying to appeal to men who subscribe to the manosphere to disown and shut down its worst elements with this message, or do you sincerely believe that the only reason hateful, abusive, misogynistic men who torture and exercise coercive control over women should be shut down is so that the rest of the manosphere can remain in existenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 07:47 PM
3

The fuck are you on about? I'm a man lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 05:15 PM
2

That was my reaction to the garbage in your post, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 03:04 PM
8

Maybe, just maybe, some men don't form views based only on what personally benefits them? Maybe some of us don't slutshame and uphold "purity culture" because it's misogynistic as fuck, regardless of how much casual sex we may or may not get? Just a thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 06:14 AM
1

And what exactly do these "countless studies" say exactly? Do enlighten me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:06 PM
1

Have you considered leveraging your charisma to make loads of money? Maybe branching out into advocacy or something like that? Kid, I keep telling ya, I don't have anywhere near the level of charisma you think I do lol. I wish I did, but alas. How did you manage to avoid the disgust that people felt when you wanted a partner at all? To the best of my knowledge, not a single person felt "disgust" at the fact that I wanted a partner. I also didn't announce to the world at large that I wanted a par…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:05 PM
1

You should probably run for office, in that case...are you socially skilled enough to make a living off of being charismatic? Not only am I not charismatic enough to be a politician, I also don't lack a moral compass, which is arguably just as important. The latter doesn't hurt when it comes to dating though (to state the obvious, you should be a decent person to be a decent person, not to impress women). Maybe a network producer or something like that. Thanks for the career advice, but it's a b…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 05:52 PM
1

I was being sarcastic. The number of women who'd reject is nowhere near 99%. Not if you're a guy who's kind, smart, funny and has his shit together generally. There's a bunch of guys I know my height and even shorter. Literally none of them are single. We can't all just be incredibly lucky and found those 1% of women lol. You guys really should consider stepping outside sometime.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 05:20 PM
1

5'5 and below is a cursed existence. 99% of women would reject a man for being this short. Expect to be disrespected simply for existing. I'm 5'2". Must have been super lucky throughout my life and met women in the remaining 1% that I also wanted to date lol, coz I never had an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 04:57 PM
1

I'm a 5'2" guy. Not rich. It's anything but "over" for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 04:52 PM
1

I'm a 5'2" guy. My current partner is about 105 lbs. I'm not remotely close to being a multimillionaire and not particularly fit at this point in time (or when we started dating). You guys really should step outside once in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 04:46 PM
1

Wait, so you're saying that you'd change your behaviour and lifestyle completely to fit whatever women have as their dealbreakers? Essentially bending over backwards to cater to whatever women want? That sounds like the most "beta cuck" (or whatever you guys call it) statement ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 06:37 AM
1

What you describe is not "biology", but in fact your own social indoctrination. Yes, patriarchy dictates that women be small, weak, submissive and what have you in order to be desirable. And men be tall, strong, rich, powerful etc. to be desirable. At this point in time, a lot of people recognize these social constructs serve nobody and should be done away with it. It is only a reactionary group of men such as yourself, and some women, who cling to these outdated gender norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 08:05 PM
1

This statement makes no sense and I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say. All I know is you haven't given any explanation as to why men can't be "ran through" but women can. Still waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:20 PM
–

You go first.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 06:37 PM
–

More like you have zero facts to back up your delusional claims, so it's just easier to say "not gonna do your research for you". I'm pretty damn sure if I actually sit down and do some "research", whatever I find will completely contradict your claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 06:32 PM
–

Firstly, if all you're going to look at are dating apps, then given the highly skewed gender ratio (was it 70/30 or even worse?), combined with the fact that more men seek casual sex than women (generally speaking), women are obviously going to get a lot more matches than men. Secondly, the first woman that was shown is not going to be "ugly" to all men uniformly. Men, just like women, are different individuals with different preferences. For me personally, neither her looks nor her age would ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 12:05 PM
–

Around the same numbers, the question is who is more sexless, the answer is men. Source? Women use it less because they don’t need it, they have Chads simping for them on IG and other apps too where they can even select better via status and money. Again, how many cases have you seen of "Chads" simping on women on IG and other apps and a meaningful number of women have said they can select better on IG via status and money? All of these conditions need to be met otherwise your claim doesn't stan…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 11:55 AM
2

If we look at how many women stay single How many women stay single? How many men stay single? how many matches they get on tinder How many matches do they get on Tinder? Do conventionally attractive and unattractive women all get the same number of matches? Do you think Tinder is an accurate representation of dating overall? Statistics show 7% of adult women and 17% of adult men in the US use it. and how many of them are Chads How many of them are "Chads"? How many "Chads" do you think actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 11:19 AM
2

How many "average girls" do you know who've actually slept with this mythical "Chad" for 1 night whom all of you are so envious of? And then said they deserve a relationship with him and will never compromise again for someone less than him. Basically everything you've written - how many actual cases have you seen of this happening in real life? A comment by one of your incel buddies on .is doesn't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 10:58 AM
1

Care to name these standards and list these studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 10:41 AM
1

It works both ways. Your "GigaStacy" (hope I got that right) can have a list of stringent requirements for men, 99.9% of women will not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 10:40 AM
2

Men's standards for women are already lower than what women's standards are for men. Objectively false. Ask any reasonable man. All they want from a woman is a woman who is nice to them, a center of peace for them, affectionate, and loyal. Basically, just be a good human being. +Must have a good-looking face, waist-to-hip ratio <0.8, BMI <25, big but not sagging tits, big round ass, no cellulite, removes body hair everyday, applies makeup everyday, dresses "feminine" but not revealing, virgin bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 07:14 AM
12

Red pill says women only like the top 20%, and men like most women If you simply get off the internet for a bit and step outside, you will immediately see that this isn't the case. Then why would average be a bad thing or a dis for a woman? If regular people (not Red Pill/self-proclaimed pickup gurus) say "average", they just mean someone who isn't very conventionally attractive but not quite unattractive either. That's it. It's neither a diss nor a compliment. Does that mean most men really set…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 06:21 AM
1

Ok, I can see where you're coming from. But surely there are still plenty of people in America who don't see things this way, and some of them would be straight women? I'm not American so I wouldn't know. Mainstream society in every country values certain things, but there's always a considerable minority within that society that don't value those things. Basically, I'm having a lot of trouble believing that the situation is really so bleak for an American man who isn't conventionally attractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 03:05 PM
1

I would have them question their views about women, what sort of women they want, whether what they want is realistic, why they think American women don't give them attention, why they think women from 3rd world countries would. It's not going to happen overnight. If they bother to do this, and if they're completely honest with themselves, at some point they will realize it's not American women that's the problem, it's their attitudes and requirements in a partner that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 02:54 PM
1

Geomaxxing, lol. Still learning incel terminology. The reality is that I can find attractive women interested in me abroad far easier than I can at home Why do you think that's the case? In my case it’s Europeans, I do substantially better with Europeans and my girlfriends have all been either born in Europe or recent immigrants from Europe. What makes European women so different from American women? Why do you think you do better with them? And before you say they’re after a passport I didn't d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 02:36 PM
1

What's your goal in saying this? To point out your delusion. How would you solve this "problem"? By not being delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 02:32 PM
0

I'm unattractive and like to think I'm a "good person". The "good feeling" of knowing that the world was full of other "good people", regardless of attractiveness, would far outweigh any "bad feeling" (if at all) of knowing that I might be even less dateable to women because the world was full of good-looking and "good men". OP (and most of the men on this sub) need a perspective on life beyond sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:20 AM
1

On the other hand, you could argue unattractive men would be more likely to actually want a long term relationship, because that would mean they have a partner for life (or at least a longish time), whereas casual sexual encounters would only be a one-time or few-times thing. So the number of unattractive men looking to "con" women into casual sex would be fewer than attractive ones. I think one can get into all kinds of hypotheticals here. At the end of the day, people are different and want di…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:34 AM
3

I will have to say, and this is anecdotal of course, that the more conventionally attractive people I've encountered have tended to be slightly more arrogant, self-obsessed and possessed of a superiority complex, on average, than those who aren't. While unattractive people have tended to be a little more insecure and lacking in confidence and self-esteem than those who aren't. Both observations apply equally to both genders, and of course I've met enough attractive people who are wonderful human…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:24 AM
4

By the way, if you're only treating your partner/women in general "nicely" because you have no options, and would treat them like shit if you could, you're not a good guy. This is an odd argument. As an unattractive man, I've no idea how I would treat women if I were attractive, because that's not a scenario that would ever arise in reality. I really hope I wouldn't treat them like shit, but it's impossible to know because if I were an attractive man I would be a completely different person with…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:13 AM
2

I can talk a bit about myself (obviously anecdotal). I'm not sure if you'd consider me "ugly", but I'm very short, which would make me undateable in the eyes of a lot of women. And I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that being conventionally unattractive has made me a better person than I would have been otherwise. It made me more empathetic by giving me a frame of reference to appreciate other people's (including women's) struggles. Perspective I wouldn't have had had I been taller, giv…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:00 AM
1

How much do you think you'll have in common with an average woman in Colombia v an average woman in the US? The main difference is that in Colombia as a white guy, you will get matches, the girls will go on dates, and they’ll have sex with you. In the US they won’t. Not more complex than that. This seems more like a problem with you than American women no?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 07:21 AM
1

Sigh. This is exactly my point, every single word. But somehow you keep interpreting it as something very different. Never mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:30 PM
1

If anything, radical feminists would be more concerned with detaching physical sex characteristics like height from concepts of masculinity and femininity. This was exactly my point. The standard that women should be shorter than their male partner is most definitely a patriarchal one. It has to do with archaic notions of femininity and masculinity. Women are supposed to be small, frail, needing protection from their male partner, men are supposed to be tall, strong, able to protect female partn…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 12:38 PM
1

Are you rich and/or famous?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 07:07 AM
1

I see. I do think there'd be some correlation, generally speaking. I'd imagine radfems to be less likely to believe in patriarchal standards than women who don't identify as feminists, or even libfems who might say "I choose to be feminine and stick to patriarchal standards".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 04:18 AM
1

I've never been rejected by a woman explicitly for my height, if that's what you're asking. There are certainly women who mentioned they need a man of a certain height (much taller than me) in regular conversations. They were all substantially taller than me, as far as I can recall.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 07:38 PM
1

It kinda makes sense that you identify as a radfem and don't cling to a patriarchal standard like man must be taller than the woman. Good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 06:53 PM
1

Say if you're male or female. Male. Say your own height. Be honest. Atleast don't lie by alot!! 5'2". Say your "ideal". Ideally within a foot of or so either way. Wouldn't be opposed to dating a woman outside of this range if we were really compatible otherwise. Give a short justification/reason for why this height is important to you. A really big height difference would make things physically awkward. That's all. I truly don't give a shit about women's height.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 10:22 AM
1

Don't get your flowery panties in a twist now, your masculinity is obviously fragile enough to crack when called effeminate names, mine isn't. Try harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 02:49 PM
1

I'd say all of this to your face and then some if you were standing in front of me right now. It's weak, insecure, cowardly little boys like you who need to compensate by constantly screeching about your "strength" and "masculinity". I pity you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 02:33 PM
1

As long as you're willing to make her a sandwich half of the time, it's all good. :P
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 10:25 AM
0

You're simply ignorant about feminism, that's a you problem. A secure, rational man will acknowledge his ignorance and educate himself, not double down on a delusional, irrational and emotion-driven opinion. Even worse are the male “allies” who lack any manner of strength, masculinity, or discipline. Quite the opposite, "male allies" are strong, disciplined, rational men who are very secure in their masculinity. That's the reason we can see the world for what it is, i.e. women still do not have …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 10:20 AM
2

Be my guest :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 05:03 AM
3

Nope, I want all of these. I have high standards and can find women who meet them. Seems you're the one who needs to settle coz no "top-tier" woman wants you, so you do the "picking" lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 05:03 AM
8

Well feminism is under the broader left-leaning umbrella, but important to call out separately because it makes a big difference to the relationship and partner's roles specifically. Though somehow, I really don't think this is what he meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:33 PM
1

You've only met a couple of shitty ones then, and are basing your opinion of all of them on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:31 PM
11

The lol is on you. This is what I want in a partner, nobody's forcing these standards on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:11 PM
1

It's delusional and 100% untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 02:18 PM
1

I don't know what kind of women you've been talking to (probably haven't been talking to any), but I can assure you, this is not how most women approach dating. Also, you Red Pillers might consider older women unattractive, the rest of us men don't (and thankfully we outnumber you guys in the real world), so women who "age" don't have to "settle" for anything - they can have their standards as high as they want. The truth is, their standards don't include being in the top 20% of attractive men i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 02:17 PM
1

How does that matter? Your assertion was that 100% of women find only 20% of men physically attractive, implying they wouldn't date the remaining 80%. Obviously this isn't the case, so your point is disproved. Whether the men in relationships are happy or not is a separate discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 10:18 AM
1

Kind, empathetic, respectful to all categories of people, left-leaning views, feminist, strong-willed, confident, independent, pragmatic, rational, well-read, articulate, good sense of humour.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 07:47 AM
1

Most of the feminists I know are all of these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 07:43 AM
1

My dude, the only thing I can tell you is to get off the internet and go outside and touch grass. Talk to real people in the real world. You'll be much better off for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 07:32 AM
1

Lol no, that is not what will happen at all. "Hypergamy" is a bogus concept, and your "statistics" will fail to explain real life relationships far more often than not. I'm not denying the importance of being conventionally attractive, but real people don't choose partners like emotionless robots based on "statistics".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 07:10 AM
1

What role do you think you have in a relationship? How do you enrich your wife's life? I provide emotional support, make her feel loved and cared for, make her laugh, a fun companion with whom she can enjoy multiple activities or just laze around, please her sexually. It's difficult to explain to someone who hasn't experienced a fulfilling relationship and only views relationships as a transaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 01:54 PM
1

Ikr? I'm not a woman but I can't imagine what it would be like to be a women who managed to get out of an abusive relationship and then read a sociopathic rant like this which blatantly victim-blames them. It must be a scary world for women with men like OP out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:53 PM
1

Ah my bad, I was pretty sure you were an MRA/incel, you're arguments were just so incoherent I couldn't be absolutely certain. But it's clear as daylight now. Also, are you high as a kite right now? Coz no sane and sober person ever talks like this lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:45 PM
1

Dude, do you realize how much of a deranged sociopath you sound like? Please get therapy, I'm not joking even the slightest.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:13 PM
1

Ok, I still don't quite follow your arguments, but fine. And yes, my entire point was that a late 20s/early 30s man preying on 18-20 year old women may not be a pedophile legally, but he absolutely is morally. An age gap of 8 months is oddly specific, and too restrictive imo lol, but less is way better than more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:10 PM
1

What on earth does any of this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:01 PM
1

I know it is not politically correct to blame women who are victims of abuse It's not just not "politically correct", it's disgusting and completely lacking in bare minimum empathy for other human beings. And "arrogant"? Really? You're calling women who end up in bad relationships "arrogant" because they didn't predict their boyfriends would be complete assholes based on their initial interactions? Also are the same women you claim men are "simple creatures" or "easy to understand and please" th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 04:56 PM
1

Yeah, well all these men are raging pedos and need to stay off the streets. Nothing else is even worth thinking about besides this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 03:54 PM
1

This is an absurdly hypothetical scenario that assumes the man in question is a pedophile. If you're a man in "your late 20s, early 30s" and are pursuing women 18+ "but no older than 20", you're not lucking out, your a predatory piece of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 03:49 PM
1

physical characteristics to have sex with that person and physical characteristics to be in a relationship with that person. Why would these be different?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 03:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter