TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DukeHammer8 Archive

View 2 posts and 83 comments by DukeHammer8 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
49

Women will literally torturing their children and receive a slap on the wrist. "Oh, the child is too old to adopt out? Then forget about their existence!" Like bruh
/r/MensRights22/12/24 11:34 AM
2

Sometimes, it takes until age 20-21 to retract.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 08:10 AM
1

Yes, it also reduces sensation, making it to wear circumcised men need to thrust harder to feel more pleasure
/r/MensRights05/12/24 09:11 AM
1

Which could tear it more easily, correct?
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:38 AM
25

The difference is that you should have gotten the choice as an adult. I'm a woman, and I personally want to get my clit removed (sorry if TMI, it just causes me a lot of distress and pain). But I am an adult. If I get the choice now, then that is actually fine. ADULTS should choose, that way you have the choice. And, also, if you were circumcised as an infant, then how can you know the difference? You can't.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 03:11 PM
4

Alright, I will share some more in a bit.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 02:07 PM
6

Thank you! Would you like any more info on the topic?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:53 PM
1

I know of that study. I used it, and linked it in my other post. If you want me to use that data for the year 2010 specifically, I can, and find out the rate then. However, yours was not the only data I used. The lowest rates 100, 117, 200, 229, and 480, as other research has shown (see 1, 11, and 12). It's possible it stayed the same, and it's possible it changed. That's why I also used such a wide range. Yours is towards the lower end, but currently probably one of the best known ones. But if …
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:51 PM
34

This is true. Circumcised men have more risky sex (no condoms, more sex with strangers and more people, etc.). Also, the Langerhans cells, in the foreskin, take HIV and other infections to another area, where they destroy them. It is only when they're overwhelmed that the person gets infected.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:36 PM
9

If you would like more info on circumcision and risks, and why it's actually bad, I can provide them to you. I'm happy to share as much as possible. I'm really happy you're open to learning, and not just ignoring everything I say or point out.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:23 PM
32

As a woman, I got to keep my entire body from birth. Why aren't men/boys given the same right to their own bodily autonomy? I will say, when I was 8, I was asked if I wanted my ears pierced. I said yeah. We went, and I had no idea it was going to be that painful. After the first ear was pierced, I was sobbing. I asked if we could please stop. It hurt so much. But they decided to do the second ear anyway. It's the most traumatic memory I have from my childhood (before the age of 13; that's when s…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:22 PM
22

I've seen no concrete proof on it preventing penile cancer. The only study I saw was a California one that had too small of an uncircumcised number to show a statistical difference. Also, men have reported getting cancer right where the scar started. Male circumcision does NOT reduce the risk of HIV. Those studies have been debunked. Also, the Langerhans cells have been seen to take HIV and other infections into other areas, where they destroy them. It is only when they get overpowered that the …
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:09 PM
29

It's a part of Intactivism. This one guy on twitter kept saying adult men die from penile cancer, and that was a reason he supported infant male circumcision, so I did this math to prove him, and everyone saying the same stuff as him, wrong, and in fact, it causes more deaths to promote infant male circumcision. Edited to add: I am also going to put this in my research paper, and show the math, too.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:59 PM
2

I think people should learn, and that means not getting mad at people for asking questions.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 06:05 AM
2

Because, as a woman, I got to keep my whole body at birth, and so did my son, but still 64% of boys in the US still don't. It should be equal.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 07:06 AM
1

Exactly. It's not ok just because they won't remember it.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 04:36 AM
1

People tend to forget the last 78 hours or so after trauma, so of course they would forget it. That's a huge sign of trauma.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:37 AM
1

You're welcome
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:37 AM
1

In my opinion, that number has always been too low. I still need to see the article in order to believe you, and as long as it's unbiased
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:35 AM
2

True.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:26 AM
2

I hate how some subreddits will automatically ban you for participating in other subreddits. Free speech exists for a reason! Also, hey ForeskinGirl, whassup? It's me, Acid Kritana from twitter or X or whatever it's called.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:26 AM
1

Yeah. Babies also feel pain more than adults, so if it's that painful for an adult, it must be absolutely excruciating to a baby.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:08 AM
23

THIS IS ADORABLE
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:36 AM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:33 AM
2

I'm not really fully sure what it does in adults, but I've heard of stories where men will describe that it is extremely painful to get circumcised as an adult.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:32 AM
2

You're fine, and you're welcome
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:30 AM
2

I also had to adjust for age a little bit, but the number almost doubled. I put it up in the post, but it is now over 24 times to almost 27 times. Edited to add: Thank you for pointing this out in the first place!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:30 AM
1

I shall
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:28 AM
2

Thank you for this!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:22 AM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:21 AM
1

May I see the evidence? I tried looking for smaller bottom estimates, could not find any. Andrew Goss on twitter claimed closer to 0-2, but never supplied any evidence for it. I reference each part of my claim, as well as trying to find the bottom estimate. Please, show me the evidence.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:19 AM
1

Do you have proof of this claim? Just a link to it, or a specific claim, or something like that. I am a woman myself, btw
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:18 AM
1

How do I translate it into the percentages then?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:15 AM
2

I took account of what 2 redditors said and shall add an edit to readjust those numbers.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:13 AM
2

Probably. Definitely in kids. But adults probably as well. Isn't that the part near the head of the penis connecting them?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:12 AM
2

I'm actually a woman, but thank you still
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:12 AM
2

Oh, you're right. I'll add an edit with this info in mind. Both you and another Redditor have pointed out important things. I have to adjust by age a little bit for the penile cancer, but also the fact that not all boys are circumcised also changes this calculation. Thank you for pointing this out!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:10 AM
4

I've been looking for studies to debunk specifically Brian Morris. Thank you for putting this out there.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:08 AM
3

You're welcome. Another redditor, u/TsuNaru already put some good info out, but I can add some more studies if you would like.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:07 AM
3

I've seen a couple videos of boys being circumcised, and each time I nearly throw up. I feel so sick. It's absolutely disgusting and horrifying. Even watching videos where they just hear the screams are so disturbing.....
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:06 AM
3

May I have a link to this page? I'm writing an article on why circumcision is wrong, and this would help.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:04 AM
2

You're right, let me look it up based on that.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:02 AM
1

18,761 relationships among 11,370 total people reported. 5,219 men (8,531 relationships) and 6,151 women (10,230 relationships). 70.7% of all nonreciprocal/one-sided DV was by women, 29.3% by men. Out of the male respondents, they reported that 25.1% of the perpetrators were male, and 74.9% female. Out of the female respondents, 32.3% reported a man as the perpetrator and 67.7% as a female as a perpetrator. Men were more likely to report being ever victimized (24.8%) over ever perpetrating (17.3…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:47 PM
1

I'm happy. This survey is awesome news! We still gotta work on it, but we're finally getting male DV victims recognized. I'm wanting to cry, I'm so happy. Not all is hopeless. We can do it. I wasn't going to give up either way, but this gives me a burst of hope.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:36 PM
3

As a woman, I'd argue that men have it worse in every country, though in some countries women have it worse than women in the west do. Just that men have it worse in each one. When you also count in privileges/rights/responsibilities, women actually get more basically everywhere, except in a couple scenarios.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 10:21 AM
2

What does that mean?
/r/MensRights04/09/23 10:19 AM
0

Ew Edited to add: your statement is stupid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/23 01:19 AM
1

Men don't have lower eq, studies have found that men and women have similar emotions. Women just have STRONGER emotions like anger, etc, while men tend to experience love towards a partner/family, etc. more. Actually men have a slightly higher IQ (like by 2 or 4 points) but it's smaller than the advantage atheists have over religious people (6 points). It is the same across societies, so men being more atheist/less religious only is partly the explanation. Atheists also aren't too common. Howeve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/23 01:19 AM
2

Men on the whatever podcast and fresh and fit have actually done the gender reversal and said they want to train their wives or have trained their wives, and people get hella mad at them
/r/MensRights31/08/23 12:22 AM
3

Knowing the way the girl talked, she probably would have laughed if the woman had attacked you.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 06:44 AM
2

I don't know why they are acting this way, but I would never model underwear, because I'm respectful to my boyfriend.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 06:18 PM
7

Notice how very shortly after second wave feminism started, that women started being viewed as better than men....and how the gap is much larger than before......
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:54 PM
2

One second. These are some ones I could find. Turns out it's 32 nations, not 39. Sorry. https://www.academia.edu/245619/Dominance_and_symmetry_in_partner_violence_by_male_and_female_university_students_in_32_nations https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/23 07:18 PM
0

Nobody said it was because he was a man....?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:01 PM
2

Actually, it's probably true. I had female feminist friends that literally randomly/unprovoked talked to me about how I was "sexist for not believing in the gender pay gap"
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:59 PM
7

Or how about start living as a man and see how far you get - that's right, farther BACK than where you started/were born.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:55 PM
1

Next time you see her, tell her to try to live as a man. If she can pass (she doesn't need testosterone or anything like that), and she lives as a man around people that didn't know she's actually a woman, then y'all can talk.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:53 PM
1

The 39 or so nation study of college students. Also fiebert bibliography 2014
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 06:46 PM
-1

The only woman a man can marry without really having a risk is either an MRA woman or a woman that is biased towards men and against women. That's rare on either account. I would suggest that most men don't marry. It takes a certain level of risk to go into that.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:44 PM
6

So don't march in the parade, or at least don't make it known why you're there. Carry the sign after you get here and are waiting in line.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 06:21 PM
6

Also depends on what data set you're looking at. Another large study in the US found that 70% of heterosexual one-sided/non-reciprocal dv is female-on-male (or the woman is abusive), while heterosexual two-sided/reciprocal is initiated mostly by the female partner.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 06:18 PM
9

Sounds pretty good. Add something about LGBT men in it though, so it seems relevant to the other marchers, and people will be less likely to attack you
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 06:14 PM
1

They could just look up how much it costs instead of letting mechanics of either gender rip them off. In fact, any one should do that. If it's in the US, that sounds illegal, especially depending on the state.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:12 PM
1

Yes, but many LGBT refuse to use it. It would be like using Latinx for all Latinos/Hispanic - as a Latina I refuse to be called Latinx. Most free refuse it. Either way, only use it for those who are ok with it, not the entire community. I've met several LGBT (including a gay woman, a trans man, and more) who hated the word queer and would never identify with it, but would want to be called it. I would say use the term that any can use, not only a portion of the community uses, on everyone.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:01 PM
8

Men are more likely to be attacked.....
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:24 PM
1

A study found that trans women regain the strength some time later even after lowering their testosterone level/upping their estrogen level (and get stronger bone density with estrogen doses, interestingly enough, in another study, while testosterone had no effect on bone density in trans men). I would say it's best for a trans woman to compete with men, and trans men to compete with men, since trans men are stronger than women after testosterone
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:33 PM
2

At least a portion of the trans movement, or moreso transgender/transsexual people I should say, actually understand that brains are gendered differently, and that's why transgender/transsexual people exist
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:30 PM
2

I do hope you're aware that it is only a portion of incels that are bad, and I'm pretty sure not even most of them....also, most of us on here aren't delusional either (I know you didn't say that most are specifically, but clearing it up)....I'm a woman just to let you know too.....
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:28 PM
2

Not everyone in the LGBT community identifies as queer, btw.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:21 PM
5

It's a sad state of reality that a sexuality that is about consenting adults is demonized/seen as bad.....
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:20 PM
5

I've been physically attacked on multiple occasions for being an MRA
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:18 PM
3

I'm perfectly fine with it. All men's rights are human rights.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:15 PM
10

Or that they have a right to genital autonomy, unlike men/boys....
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:41 PM
1

Rape culture against male victims of female/male perpetrators and female victims of female perpetrators does exist though
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:35 PM
1

There were some anti-prison rape billboards a bit ago
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:30 PM
2

I'm not sure if there's any. The barbie movie is incredibly sexist against men
/r/MensRights05/08/23 02:31 PM
4

If you're black out drunk then you cannot consent. But when we bring up drunk cases, we do NOT mean black out drunk except if we say it specifically. Otherwise, we mean cases where they were simply drunk. Thoughts can turn to actions easier when you're drunk. Many feminists don't understand that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/23 02:28 PM
1

That honestly feels like she's doing a form of cheating
/r/MensRights05/08/23 02:24 PM
2

Most actual rape victims never report. Liars "report" far more than actual victims do, proportionately.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:40 AM
3

Which is why the CIA didn't release and got rid of their study on circumcision?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:39 AM
1

Circumcised male genitalia looks like erect un-circumcised male genitalia. Females also get smegma and dirty privates just like men do. What do they do? Wipe. It's called NOT BEING LAZY. You don't have to resort to surgery on an UNCONSENTING INFANT before they even have a chance to prove that they're not as lazy as you. If it was really about hygiene, then girls would be circumcised too. It doesn't reduce STDs. That has been debunked time and again. In fact, it INCREASES STD risk. Shaving down t…
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:36 AM
3

In some cases, female circumcision actually helps the person (vast majority it does not), such as with clitoral phimosis. It's still RARE. Just because a couple people need it doesn't mean apply it to everyone.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:25 AM
2

Females also get smegma, and are the ones who often don't clean down there, if I remember correctly. Everyone should clean their privates. It's called not being lazy, not "surgery!"
/r/MensRights07/06/23 12:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter