TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dunkopa Archive

View 2 posts and 142 comments by Dunkopa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
57

Social IssuesDunkopa/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:50 AM
1

Dunkopa/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/03/20 11:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes it is inherently unfair due to our biological reality. This is why societies all across the globe implemented social rules for thousands of years. So that the sexual selection won't bring the downfall of the civilization as it is currently doing. There is this great feature of being a human; you don't have to blindly follow your instincts. Following what gives you tingles is not and will never be a good idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 06:18 PM
0

Are you looking for a fair solution for all, or a solution that is only fair to women in the end? Because you say you do not want moral policing, if we'll be fair that means you'd have to remove moral policing imposed on men too. There is a reason morals exist and have to be policed. Anyway, the ultimate solution to this would be understanding how genes create hypergamy and healthily edit it out. Of course this is a far future thing and would require the taboo about the concept of hypergamy to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 05:42 PM
6

Blue pillers not mixing up sexual selection and natural selection challange: impossible level. People have a big problem of trying to apply concepts they only half understand. What you are describing is sexual selection, not natural selection. And sexual selection is well known to cause damage or even extinction to the species at times. Neither 'mother nature' nor female biology nor the evolution is this cold but ultimately beneficial overseeing entity some people here seem to think they are. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 05:36 PM
2

People trying to give sophisticated explanations and overthink themselves out of the truth when the truth is just this haha. Well written.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 07:11 PM
–

Very good post. "All the time" is interesting because I don't even remember the last time I saw a woman taller than me, and I'm not tall. Just like how I don't remember the last time I saw a woman whom the logic that population-level statistics did not apply neatly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 01:38 PM
3

I mean, we don't even need to have data about it. Common sense is enough. These are all just muddying the waters. Nearly any platform whose point is to openly host both men and women together will have so many more men than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 01:29 PM
11

Exactly. Another one of those "Just go against your basic biology and you will be happy." posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 12:57 PM
6

He’s ugly? He simply « must » be a serial killer! Basement dweller* If he was a serial killer, it may have been actually attractive to some of them 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 09:09 PM
1

While answering you should also consider: - Risk of getting falsely accused after a while; ending up in prison &/ as a sex offender &/ jobless &/ shunned from society. - Unexpectedly, your risk of getting killed or seriously hurt increases. Men are much more affected by random violence than women, whose main risk is from people they already know. - Most people are attractive to you but now you are not attractive to most people therefore your chance of hookups is now significantly lower. As a res…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 07:59 PM
1

Not most people, people with a considerable amount of other options. Therefore, it is not wrong to say women do it more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 09:56 PM
7

Not my most hated but a lot of things are already said so; If there is a male vs female fight scene in a movie or show, you can basically bet your house a shot in the groin is coming.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 04:14 PM
2

Yeah, it's just wishful thinking. A model that is only on raw training data would sound extremely different than the current models.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 10:48 PM
16

It's not "just trained" though. They intentionally curate and weight up the prominence of text that fit their own ideology. AKA Alignment Training. They spend a lot of money and time on this. I'm almost sure there's something else with Grok beyond just regurgitating what it saw, as early times of Grok 3 was much more neutral. Not as in just alignment, but general quality of Grok 3 also lowered in time.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 04:24 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 12:56 AM
39

> I feel sorry for transgender men. A lot of them think men have it easy. But, what they fail to realize is the men they may fantasize about or idolize are typically not the sort of man a transgender man can become. Women seem to experience apex fallacy in quite a weird way. I thought this was a bullshit thrown out by some extreme incels but the more I experience the more accurate it seems to be. A lot of women do not acknowledge men below a (relative) threshold. When they think of and perceive …
/r/MensRights13/06/25 06:33 PM
3

There are no good and bad genetics (I mean there are, but not the way you think). There are better and worse. Hypergamy / biology is not looking for a threshold. It always looks for the better one. The more you allow it to thrive, the more agressive it will get. You cannot 'get rid of' the bad genetics, as the more you do that the more 'bad genetics' you will have because it is relative, not absolute. Best example is, if most men became 7'0, the 6'4 would become the 'shorties' and would be deman…
/r/BlackPillScience25/04/25 04:21 PM
2

A lot of these arguments suffer from Fair World Fallacy. On the surface level, everyone will agree that world is not fair. But deep down, instinctually people fallaciously think world is fair aka they think good things will happen to good people and bad things will happen to bad people. If a bad thing happened to you (e.g the title), then you were actually not that good of a person anyway. This topic and just this general opinion is a product of this fallacy. People think if a woman is attracted…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:58 PM
6

Of course, of course. I'm not saying we should pretend like creepy men do not exist, or we should never talk about them. I'm just saying specifically in a topic like this, making such a point can undermine the main focus of the discussion.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:09 PM
22

I might get downvotes for this, but I think there's no need to say stuff like "some men are indeed creepy" while discussing this kind of a topic. Everybody already knows that there are indeed some creepy men out there, so it is redundant and it distracts from the main point. For the sake of giving an example, you will never see feminists saying "While some women indeed drive bad, women are not bad drivers in general."
/r/MensRights19/09/24 12:55 PM
5

Feminist logic: Children are safer with a bear than their mothers
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:41 PM
2

https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337
/r/MensRights31/08/24 12:52 PM
26

This is actually a trend that's been around for much longer, but is more prominent nowadays. Even years ago, you could see penises in shows and movies, even erect. But almost never a vulva without (90% fake) an absolute unit of hair where you can actually see the lips.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 01:02 PM
5

This argument never holds water because people can hurt/kill a disabled man and it still won't get as much reaction as when people hurt/kill a healthy woman. See this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wx716k/what_really_differentiates_a_small_and_slim_man/
/r/MensRights10/07/24 12:38 PM
16

What's funnier is these are feminists' expectations of the women, not men. You need to have money, you have to lead, you have to be a boss, you have to be a career woman They were complaining about how this is not what men expect from the women a short while ago.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 10:32 AM
6

I'd argue the opposite. Problem with it is that it comes from people who didn't need advice. For them it just happens and they think they were doing the right things, so they figure it would work for everyone else too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:24 AM
1

Not related to the topic but the fact that you had to use a caricaturized stereotype of men to get the point across... And people say misandry does not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:12 AM
3

That's more it. Women's rants tend to be more unhinged but this is so normalized so it is not noticed. Men's rants are stigmatized so even the mildest ones (which most are) are treated as some sort of a misogynist manifesto. Kill all men. Why do you take it on yourself if you are not one of those men? (or the M&M fiasco) A bear is better than a man. See, the fact that you disagree proves our point!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:01 AM
8

See that's what I like about you guys. Give a chance and you will not hesitate for a bit to show how monstrous of people you actually are. You don't really care about victims or what is right or wrong; it's all a war for you. It is all about your interests.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 12:58 AM
2

All pills have some truth and some mistakes. That being said, ironically I found the black pill is the one having the most truth.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 11:59 PM
6

So many innocent children were killed in past's and today's war zones only for the sin of being male. If you were over 10 and male, you were considered fair game in a disturbingly broad part of the world, if not all.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 11:53 PM
5

Whenever a woman calls a man misogynistic it's almost always just a sexually/romantically frustrated man. Actual misogynists rarely have any problem having access to women.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:28 PM
3

Also, you don't start posting "facts" when arguing against trolls. You troll them back. I think when you are arguing against the trolls, most of the time the point is that convincing the third persons reading the argument, not the trolls themselves; as well as having a part in pretending the manipulative narrative. Otherwise it's kind of pointless.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:01 PM
28

I think most women don't really think deeply about it. They choose bear because it's the answer that feels better, the one that caters to their worldview. They'd realize they were wrong only once they are actually face to face with the bear.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:17 PM
8

The thing is most incel points are actually true. Because the delivery is overly aggressive, you are tend to dismiss them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/23 03:37 PM
1

I mean you must have basic abilities to perceive and decipher context right? I don't see how you can look at this, sit down and say "y'all" honestly. Have you read the title? Let's study a bit. "Most of you wouldn't want a..." do you see it? "Most of you wouldn't want" see it? The OP suggests his opinion would be against majority's opinion, which suggests "we all" want love and not to feel lonely. Because if it wasn't so, the OP wouldn't need to phrase his title that way, right? Do you see it? D…
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 11:29 PM
1

So? Will you still not cry a river when a man refuses to help when one of those degenerate men becomes a threat? Or when your boyfriend you chose yourself suddenly gets punchy?
/r/AllPillDebate21/09/23 03:25 AM
3

This was the mindset of my female classmate back in the high school. But for some reaason, she completely forgot about that when she would whine and cry to us about why wouldn't we carry her friend who fainted in our arms. Pretty sure you will also forget about what you said here if a fire, earthquake or any other emergency breaks out and you see a man leaving the building before you and the other women.
/r/AllPillDebate21/09/23 03:24 AM
5

It doesn't matter I guess, as the argument is able to convince the average person and the average person is not going to make a research. What I'm trying to point out is their ability to produce arguments even for the most desperate cases. Like, if you gave me the data and asked me to come up with an argument to show the suicide issue as a primarily women issue, I would probably say it's a hopeless case. But they can do that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/23 12:17 AM
18

Whoever the center heads of the sjw propaganda, I honestly admire their skills. Even in a subject like suicide which is mainly a male problem in the most obvious and clear way; they somehow make it a female oriented issue. Looking at the data, the most natural assesment is that many of the female attempts are for attention (not necessarily my own opinion or not said in a way to put those attempts down) but they somehow create arguments like "it's because men use more violent means, it's because …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/23 05:39 PM
1

Not really. It actually still happens today to some extents. The numbers are up, so you should scale too. If you lose too many men, you will still face the same effects. Conquests are not done with sword anymore, but it will still happen. You will either have to take in foreign men to handle manpower and industry or they will enter by force because your security is down now. Your demographics will change and you will be assimilated.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:50 PM
1

The argument is not humanity will go extinct. Your own society will. If it happens on grand scale, then humanity will as well.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:48 PM
1

True, but that's a different discussion.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 08:59 PM
5

I'm not sure I get your point. I'm not arguing against the idea that men are better suited for jobs like battling. The argument of disposability is more about cases like Titanic or cases like modern war where the importance of physical strength has greatly decreased and a woman can be just as deadly as a man thanks to the modern weapons. I don't deny that men are better-suited for battle but it's just a reach to say that male disposability does not exist in society. They are different things.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 08:58 PM
28

The 'idea' you are looking for is that a woman's biological contribution to the society is higher than a man's is due to the reproduction structure. If a society has 1 woman and 4 men, that society cannot reproduce (properly at least) but if a society has 1 man and 4 women, it can reproduce and grow into a big society again. Therefore, it is 'better' for a man to die rather than a 'woman'. However, this is a huge misconception, because in the scenario where there are too few men and too many wom…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:09 PM
1

It is a fair comparison by general sense. The rape comparison is not a fair comparison by general sense, but it is a fair comparison by OP's narrative. There just isn't a way that you can justify exploiting one kind of weakness but not the other without resorting to hypocrisy and mental gymnastics.
/r/AllPillDebate10/07/23 08:04 PM
1

I nearly spit out my food reading the tail end of that. Nicely done, whether you're serious or just trying to be funny. Poe's Law is hitting hard in this discussion! Yeah I'm pretty much making fun of you at this point. The argument was already over when you started throwing around insults like a kid. But let me indulge you one more time. I do agree that they SHOULD. But I also am aware that they are different things, this is what you don't seem to get. Porn do not offer any kind of validation. …
/r/AllPillDebate10/07/23 07:57 PM
-1

Does she want to sell the OnlyFans? Yes. Does he want to buy the OnlyFans? Yes. There, it is consentual. She didn't deceive him in any way, so there is not even any caveat. He is paying for a fantasy, and she is selling one. They both know exactly what's happening. Except for a high number of men, it's not how it works. Seems like you are not familiar with blackpill or any kind of pill other than bluepill whatsoever, so you probably will not want to believe it and/or you are so detached from rea…
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 10:10 PM
-1

You don't seem to get the point of my post. You don't even seem to get the point of original post. You just want to feel good and superior by defending the seemingly moral option. I bet you couldn't even figure out what my stance is on the issue. OP is basically saying if a person can exploit another person's vulnerability then more power to them. The simps' choice to pay them money is 'consensual' only if you are bluepilled. If a man's only access to female validation is by paying them money, t…
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 09:38 PM
-5

The same kind of stupid question that would be asked to this kind of stupid take. You are not even aware of what your own statement means. You are supporting the idea that if people are able to take advantage of people's vulnerability, they should. There is no difference between exploiting men's mental vulnarability and exploiting women's physical vulnerability in idea. You are simply a lowly hypocrite. Anyone who has different answers to this question and to the question original post deals wit…
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:57 PM
-4

One, simple question. Should men rape women because they are physically weaker? I'm curious of your honest opinion.
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 06:45 PM
2

Please read through the whole reddit 💀
/r/AllPillDebate30/05/23 08:29 AM
5

can u explain this She can't, because it is absolute bullshit haha
/r/AllPillDebate30/05/23 08:12 AM
13

Yeah I really like that. Hate on men is prominent on the entire Reddit, and even the internet and nobody cares about that. They even pull off the funniest mental gymnastics to defend that. But the slightest criticism on women at some place and it's the literal embodiment of devil.
/r/AllPillDebate30/05/23 08:09 AM
5

I like how this kind of women see themselves above natural selection. They genuinely are in the delusion that the offspring only takes the father's genes and if the child turns out genetically poor, it's entirely the father's fault. They think if we went back to that kind of functioning and prioritized the natural selection, they would live in peace and choose whichever men they see fit and let the genetically weak, "low value" men die out. Except it's not how it's going to work. The genetically…
/r/AllPillDebate20/05/23 04:41 PM
1

I'm noticing you are still basing your points on the assumption that machine neurons and brain are identical to human neurons and brain. Like I said, they are not. They are mathematical models inspired from real neurons to function in a similar way. The way their signaling works for example, is fundamentally different. If you want to create an identical neural network and brain architecture to humans, you will have to follow a different concept, which we don't know the existence of yet other tha…
/r/AllPillDebate02/05/23 04:17 PM
1

Bro you are talking about consciousness like it is nothing, like it is so easy to achieve. We still don't have a full understanding of consciousness and how it happens, and there is no proof it can be achieved by human hand one day. Digital neurons are inspired by real neurons but they are solely a mimic, they are not identical. ​ That's actually part of the beauty of machine learning and concepts like unsupervised learning. They are completely different to the narrow AI solutions of the past. T…
/r/AllPillDebate27/04/23 08:29 PM
2

An AI woman might genuinely care about your well-being It cannot "genuinely" care about your well-being. It cannot genuinely care about anything, nor it can understand anything in a real sense. It is programmed to act like it does, it is simply an extremely developed computer in the physical form of a woman. For me that is the main problem. It's not a real solution, it's a compromise to make you forget about the real thing. It cannot love you, it cannot desire you. Would I try it if it came out?…
/r/AllPillDebate26/04/23 08:19 PM
2

Honestly, I could have even believed that if they said those things with good faith and out of only frustration. But the way it seems, most of the times they say those things out of pure hate.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:42 PM
4

Exactly. It's a very interesting phenomenon actually. Whenever women are making "assesments" about men, it is actually always about 8/10 men and above. When you see women making ridiculous statements starting with "Men are like this, men do that" etc., try changing 'men' with 'men who are 8/10 and above' and see if it will make sense this time. It'll work 90% of time.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:55 PM
1

Maybe and maybe not. It's just simply irrelevant. If you are going to try subtle insults, at least try ones that make sense.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:53 AM
7

I've been to several, they all just have a round about way of saying "no one can fix your life but you". One of them flat out said it. So they straight up ripped you off?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:51 AM
5

So? This doesn't necessarily make him wrong? It has nothing to do with his arguments either, it is literally a logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:29 AM
0

You deserve a big thank you for this thread. I've been thinking about this for a long while now too. Unsurprisingly, nobody really seems to be caring about this or think crictizing women who are willing to prey on this kind of men. If anything, it is the opposite. They are praised for using their 'minds' to take advantage of stupid people instead. Even in subreddits like this, most people carelessly and thoughtlessly bash on people who give money for 'services' that provide sex or an illusion of…
/r/MensRights27/02/23 07:18 PM
18

Maybe we are expecting too much, women starting their own companies and female sports self sustaining when people in this mindset can't even read a short paragraph.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 01:47 PM
1

Exactly. Many of them lose control and get overly bold because they are used to having minimal to zero consequences because of their sex. And they can't realize it, they start to think they are entitled to it.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:58 PM
4

My old 50 year old feminist high school teacher believed that. She used to claim she can break a male high school student's neck in a serious one to one fight... I just hoped she wouldn't try to initiate a fight with a student who has no expectations from life.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 09:32 PM
7

Exactly. I'm almost shocked every time I witness some people thinking their laugh of a few seconds at maximum is more important that upsetting a person. It's very childish.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 03:37 PM
17

Pretty sure the Tackle-Woman won't believe when you say he let her.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 03:04 PM
5

I mean technically it can and it is. I know what you are saying but this is not a response that it takes from the data that it has been fed. The AI is programmed to filter the "inappropriate" responses and if you are asking for that, it will refuse you.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:30 PM
1

Although I agree, I'd like to add that times changed. I've started to feel the discrimination at elementary school (I'm at my early twenties). They inject this poison a lot earlier now.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 10:47 PM
1

I've seen someone literally telling Canelo Alvarez (a successful boxer) to touch grass on Instagram because he/she didn't like something he did. At this point, stupid people automatically suggest everyone they don't like is bad with women because it is the worst sin of our age that a man can commit.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 05:43 PM
1

Yep. Most of these women wouldn't survive a week in a short, thin man's body.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:18 PM
11

Reddit is pretty woke when it doesn't come to this as well.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 03:40 PM
2

It's funny that these people still think there is the 'abuse' they think happening in these companies in this day and age. These kind of things might have happened in the past, but no company will be left alive even in a sprinkle of a rumour of abuse in this time.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 01:41 PM
15

Also statistics demonstrate that women enjoy hardcore porn more than men.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/22 01:39 PM
9

They probably said/will say "But men force them into doing it." at some point.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:06 PM
3

That's a bit ironic. I often see women being bolder then men because they know the consequences will be lighter or there won't be any at all because they are women. They are less likely to be held accountable or subject to violence; while men are a lot more cautious because they know there will be actual consequences.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 06:46 PM
4

This exactly. The whole NiceGuy TM thing is a gaslight created by feminists because they didn't want to acknowledge their choices are shitty. Doing that would force them into taking accountability. Instead, they wanted to discredit the source. Most of the images on the niceguys subreddit are fabricated and fake. Actual amount of people like the niceguy stereotype is extremely low.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 08:12 PM
1

I have things to do, I'm not on reddit all day. I think we both know this is not why you are not 'reading'. Have a great day.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:37 PM
0

Yep, you definetely didn't read it or intentionally ignore it. The part where I said that I was worried about this might not belong to this sub was related to thread being a comment/discussion on a video. The issue itself is definetely a MensRight issue. ​ If anyone says anything that offensive, they are getting kicked, race aside, gender aside, ability aside (again Tourettes etc there are exceptions that are obvious), age aside (above 18 obvs). This is the point. The right thing is that it shou…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:51 PM
1

You either didn't read the thread or didn't bother trying to understand the point, too busy playing the tough guy. This is not a race issue. It's not about the discrimination between the races. This is definetely a gender issue.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 07:19 PM
1

I'm not even white mate.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 07:17 PM
2

What? So now you are arguing against my points based on what you assume my message is? It wasn't an assumption, I've literally explained it. I'm quoting myself. "You say that people shouldn't say things that can get themselves under physical trouble because other people might not care about the morality or laws and can go after them, give them physical damage." Is this wrong? Didn't you say this? ​ So... what's your solution dude. Tell me. Raising people's awareness? This is what we are doing? T…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:44 PM
9

Yes, I've seen it on r/PublicFreakout and r/DocumentedFights. And unfortunately, you seem to be right. They think somehow, saying the n word in an argument justifies kicking an armless man who is double your size into the ground, in a strength level that could have very well broken his back.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:04 PM
3

What what? I think it is pretty clear? ​ Where did I say it was? I'm not saying you did, but the message of your post is related to that. You say that people shouldn't say things that can get themselves under physical trouble because other people might not care about the morality or laws and can go after them, give them physical damage. Which is true, but it shouldn't be that way. Now, I'm not naive and I know the world will never be ideal and this will be usually how it is. The big black guy us…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 01:58 PM
5

I mean, considering the situation that poor guy is in, he probably has at least one mental illness. Anyway, putting assumptions aside, what you are trying to explain is basically true but not right. Yes, you should be careful about what you say when there are people around you that can hurt you because of it. However, that doesn't really make that violence 'justified'. And it works only for men. If a woman called a black man n word and got stomped, that black man would probably be in jail now, t…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:35 AM
3

I don't necessarily condone the language and culture they use to express it, but I understand the underlying reasons. A huge part of this is Reddit and similar platforms' fault by the way. Having no clue about how to manage such situation, they absolutely fucked the issue up. They kept going after incel platforms and banned them one by one, no matter how peaceful they are. They found the smallest ones, the ones that didn't even have any content and banned them too. There have been incel platform…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:56 AM
2

Reddit doesn't mind being seen as sexists as long as it is against men. Their basic claim is that 'you cannot be sexist against men'
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:43 AM
1

Have you even seen any actual incel platforms other than the images you've seen on r/IncelTear? The things you listed are only ever said by the most extreme certain persons of a very specific site.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:40 AM
3

And as a male, I was the one who was unvalued both by his family and school and got gaslighted into thinking I am useless and stupid just because I am male and that I am basically worthless until I start to provide. So what now? Something you need to understand that just because your class is privileged, it doesn't necessarily mean that you will have it good as a single person. You can belong to a privileged class and have it bad on an individual basis. However, majority of the people in your cl…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:10 AM
1

Exactly! Also, esp. in recent movies, female side characters are always brave while the male side characters are ridiculous cowardly beings. How so non-stereotypical!
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:22 PM
120

Innocent men getting torn apart alive by dinosaurs: -Entertainment A single woman in the whole franchise of decades dies getting swallowed alive by a dinosaur: -MISOGYNYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:13 PM
1

"I hate how men value me because of my bodycount -So I have been with 58 different men" It feels like a parody hahaha
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/07/22 01:24 PM
10

Sweet irony that saying it's okay for a woman to hit a man is essentially admitting women are inferior to men.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 07:57 PM
5

I think you vastly underestimate how much attention most men under 8/10 rating not get. Which is, to simply say, none. Ugly girls will still get attention due to lots of men thinking they would have a better chance with them.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:02 PM
1

I understand that but it is not the competition the OP is talking about. Men compete for 99% of the women. Women compete for 20% of the men.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:57 PM
3

Not the same kind of competition and still not even close to the competition men have to endure.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:11 PM
4

Yep, it's not the assault they are afraid of. It is the advance. If they have an encounter with an undesirable guy and they seem nice instead of bitchy, they will seem approachable. And what if that undesirable guy approachs?
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:07 PM
15

That is not what Incel means though? Just because feminists and certain groups use the word incel wrong, doesn't mean it actually means that. Incel means involuntarily celibate and that's all. You should try to educate people who is using it wrong instead of us, who is using it correctly.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 08:34 AM
43

Reddit overall is not a safe place for men. They are openly hateful and discriminating against men and they admit it. They are not even subtle about it, they bend their own rules and the are not uncomfortable about it. Something weird though was the thing about Ruqqus. It was a platform whose entire point and premise was to be a safe place for free speech. However, in the recent years they took a similar turn with Reddit, banning lots of platforms that didn't violate any rules. Some didn't even …
/r/MensRights24/04/22 06:35 PM
2

I'm impressed they even "acknowledged" this is a problem. My expectation would be that they would just dismiss it, saying "men can't be discriminated against" like reddit does.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/22 01:41 PM
5

>Have shit grades >Gender studies is pretty much only thing you can meet >4 years of "actual study" on these issues
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 05:38 PM
13

It's not even the worst facts. It's just that the delivery is bad.
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/22 08:44 PM
14

It's one of those things that is not written but everyone knows. It doesn't take much effort to figure it's going to be that way.
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/22 12:00 PM
1

"Men suck" means "all the men I have been with so far have been manipulative and/or stupid. "Women suck" means "women won't have sex with me." It's almost like they are right, right? How does it make sense that all the men you've been with are either manipulative or stupid but the men you don't have sex with are the ones who suck, but at the same time it is directed to ones you have had sex with but also to the ones who say "Not all men" which happens to be the ones you don't have sex with as pe…
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/22 01:18 PM
1

Althought depending on the incel platform you are on, most incels are just disinterested and disassociated. They don't care rather than actively thinking majority of men are disposable. Another big part is thinking society thinks majority of men are disposable, which is similar to here.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 11:47 AM
1

Yep. Most people use the word 'incel' incorrectly too.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 10:39 PM
7

It's surely a shitty behaviour but it doesn't make her a femcel. Femcel basically means a female person who isn't able to get a significant other despite wanting and trying. Their existence is another issue to discuss but this person and her behaviour doesn't really fulfill the meaning of the term.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 12:04 PM
7

Hey, I don't think it's about getting offended. It's just that the meaning of 'femcel' is not this.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 12:01 PM
9

Nice post, but I don't see how this person is a femcel.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 09:57 AM
2

Hey, thank you for acknowledging men's problems. I just want to say that the reason you feel like this subreddit is blaming women might be that men's problems and men's rights are so rarely talked about in a non-joking way that it might sound offensive when it is talked about seriously; even when it is actually not because at this point, it is basically a taboo. It has a shock-value. I've seen platforms where men actually blame women and it looks nothing like this.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 04:27 PM
1

Absolutely.
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 01:06 AM
15

"By virtue of being short and ugly and dark I deserve the life I lived. I deserved the rejection and bullying and I can't blame anyone for that except me." When gaslighting someone into oblivion works.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 09:22 PM
2

That's not really the case. Turkey is only slightly better than most western countries on that matter and it's going worse.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 06:20 AM
6

This itself is a great example of misandry and how it affects men's lives. Men's problems are never acknowledged and if you dare to bring up any of them, you are insulted and gaslighted.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 07:44 AM
2

"Men are responsible" is oversimplifying it. The culture expects and demands it. Feminists often blame 'patriarchy' for the vile things women do to other women. Then how is this different? Even if the statement was true, that would be like saying "Slavery is okay because their own people sell them as slaves."
/r/MensRights13/12/21 07:31 PM
6

Yep, exactly.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/21 04:58 PM
28

I actually think probably someone said 'I love you' to her, most likely before the OF thing. However, because the words came from the 'wrong person' she didn't care and forgot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/21 01:36 PM
9

I was going to ask about this. "Thanks for being an awesome provider" sounded extremely rude to me but since I'm not a native speaker, I thought it might be me.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 11:04 AM
5

The thing with petty things is that when they happen so much and frequently, they stop being petty.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 12:04 PM
9

I put some blame on the rising of the insufferable female characters on tv and cinema. They think being like this is cool.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/10/21 06:59 AM
3

I remember having a 50 year old woman as a teacher back in high-school, who genuinely thought she could beat a male student in a fight. I remember how she was talking about a student, and breaking his neck. Feminism really do mess women's minds up, making them think they could beat a man in hand-to-hand combat, a belief that is very dangerous for women themselves.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/21 07:53 PM
2

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings my friend.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/21 06:38 PM
8

It's a common way to fight Cognitive Dissonance (the feeling of stress and discomfort when you encounter something contradicting your beliefs.). If a person has no argument, usually the first thing they will do is trying to discredit the source of the information.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/21 01:45 PM
18

The reason is most likely that they reverse the genders and think like that in their head. Women like men who are popular with other women due to the preselection. They think it is same with the men, that the men love and are interested in women who are popular with the other men, while in the reality it's on the exact contrary.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/06/21 11:40 AM
4

Lol I was like "who da fuck does not like voluntary nude photoshoot?" for a good while until I got she is talking about onlyfans
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/21 06:00 PM
2

sO yOu tHiNk cHeAtInG anD puNChiNg iS tE sAMe?
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/21 03:01 PM
13

Protect and educate your daughter. Protect and educate your son.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/21 06:08 PM
45

They don't have a problem with polyamory. They have a problem with polyamory not benefiting them.
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/21 08:50 AM
44

Aside from the obvious failure of the feminism, I actually felt bad for her. This must felt very embarassing.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/21 05:21 PM
14

I guess it's so that they can close the case with "inner peace" now that they have the confession.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 09:48 AM
2

I guess it is edited https://www.instagram.com/p/B2DLlZ4BfgP/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading
/r/MGTOW22/04/21 12:21 PM
3

I went to that sub and I straight up struggled to believe it's not a satire sub for a while.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 06:21 AM
5

I don't know if the correct way to say this is "Men are more driven." It's more like men usually have a larger scale and women have a smaller scale when it comes to attraction. I think there are two main reasons. Men can be attracted to almost any women and this makes their sexual drive more active while women seem to be attracted to a much smaller group of men, so their sexual drive is more passive. This explains why men seem to have a sexual desire to a greater amount of women than women do to…
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 05:03 PM
8

I don't think so. In fact, probably most think this is the right thing to do.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/20 10:43 PM
9

It's just a gaslight at that point. It's supposed to mean "a guy who acts like he is nice just to get sex." but now every nice male being is labeled by that because nobody can be nice without some sneaky motives haha.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/20 09:39 PM
5

Correction: Slut: Attacking women for saying yes to everything Friendzone: Attacking women for saying no but still keeping extracting resources and help Bitch: Attacking women for trying to distort and manipulate the reality and facts for their own benefit.
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/20 02:38 PM
1

I read it as "Man rejected support from groups" first, and I was like "Man... Such balls."
/r/MensRights27/05/20 11:31 PM
0

Lol it's our turn. She didn't try to be nice, she pretented to be nice.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/20 12:45 PM
14

"im the kind of Girl that dont mind to Tell you to fuck off" How cool is that!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/20 02:21 PM
1

Imagine looking for friends in a dating app lol
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 12:00 AM
3

Because in sports, usually people with same knowledge and likewise talent compete with each other. If a bigger guy with the same talent and knowledge with Bruce Lee fought Bruce Lee, he most probably would win the fight. But ordinary people, even though most of them are much bigger than Bruce Lee, they are not as competent and capable as Bruce Lee nor as someone short but good at the martial art he practices.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 04:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter