TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DutchUncle Archive

View 0 posts and 184 comments by DutchUncle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Agreed. If you have 100% of the right over whether or not you bring a child into this world, then it should be presumed that you have 100% the responsibility. Outside of marriage, a man should be able to opt-out.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:55 AM
12

I don't remember the quote exactly, or who said it, but it goes something like this: "The great failure of Western Civilization is that virtue, which used to refer to the manliness of men, has come to mean the chastity of women."
/r/MensRights13/01/11 02:41 PM
8

Helicopter parenting is potentially a broad term. However, when people talk about it, they're not usually talking about parents who insist on high standards for their kids. They're talking about parents who complain to their kid's coach or teacher when the kid isn't first string or on the honor role. The kind of parent discussed in this article complains to the kid.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 02:46 PM
4

[T]he role of the home environment on IQ is negligible. That's fine. But the role of IQ in achievement is far from an ironclad cause and effect. What's the role of the home environment on academic success? That's the question.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 02:42 PM
1

This brings up the point of subjectivity, which used to make the prosecution of rape more difficult. I am by no means suggesting that we go back to the days of "she was asking for it," but we ought to try to come up with some clear-cut criteria that warrants a prosecution. "Realizing" a week later that you were raped seems a bit suspect to me, and violates the "it's better to see 10 guilty people go free..." adage.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 12:57 PM
6

He told me straight up that if I go to bed with him, he would assuming I consent to sex... Between two mature adults, that might mean something. Of course, in the courts, that means nothing. A woman could testify that she understood that, and then later withdrew her consent. It's then her word against his. Moreover, I'll take your word that the gentleman was a gentleman, but apart from doing this for the sake of argument, what does it even mean, what he said? If you go to bed with him it may ver…
/r/MensRights10/12/10 11:12 PM
2

To the husband, it is a basic service. She gets a ton of money to play with. He gets his children cared for (by a nanny), his house kept clean (by a maid), and food on the table (by Whole-food's take-out). He also gets the social status/etc from the trophy wife who will likely still want to keep/cultivate her social contacts/status as well. This is the first bit of anthropology applied to the modern Western world that has made any sense. Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 12:41 AM
3

I'd like to see where 17-year-old male students express the desire to become rich, have a vasectomy, and serial fuck a bunch of young, nubile women, never marrying any of them, and trading them each in for a younger model when they grow too old or simply too annoying, and the author of that article writes, "I can understand why."
/r/MensRights10/12/10 12:39 AM
3

The reason they went to the police is because they wanted to force him to get tested... If that is genuinely the case, then it's the police who have instigated these charges. But, I'm sorry, it's not rape. I can buy the idea that a woman might not try to physically resist. I've even heard people say that there might be an evolutionary trait that causes women to sometimes acquiesce when in such a situation, since a caveman -- or his modern equivalent -- might cause a woman grievous harm. But you …
/r/MensRights09/12/10 01:36 PM
-6

What has Assange done wrong?
/r/MensRights07/12/10 06:38 PM
2

They're much more likely to be raped because they're drunk. If anything, they ought too avoid weekend binging more than the homeless.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 03:00 PM
4

"It's okay because I'm a mother."
/r/MensRights07/12/10 02:57 PM
2

I wouldn't mind having my own water fountain. The women just monopolize the fountains filling up water bottles, and the kids slobber all over them.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 02:10 PM
1

I can’t help feeling saddened by my well-meaning bias... That's the quote from the article that got me: "well-meaning bias." I'm sure you'll agree that it's not fair that minorities be given a curfew, but I understand your well-meaning bias. Please don't beat yourself up about it.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 02:08 PM
2

I don't think you understand quite how horrible horrible is.
/r/MensRights06/12/10 08:20 PM
3

Women have the sole right for deciding whether or not a child comes into this world, and so, outside of marriage, it is only right that a man be able to insist that she take sole responsibility.
/r/MensRights06/12/10 07:58 PM
1

Do you really want her to ruin her friendship with someone who is probably otherwise a good friend. Yes. I think duping some poor slob into bringing a child into this world, especially when, according to the original post, this woman doesn't even have her life in order, is a character flaw that runs right to the core. Who would be friends with someone like that?
/r/MensRights06/12/10 07:55 PM
2

Are you saying this woman is a CIA operative? Listen, I'm sorry. I think this thread has gone on too long as it is. I'm out.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 06:11 PM
1

Why go to Cuba?
/r/MensRights03/12/10 04:26 PM
2

Exactly. I just like knowing where people stand on such issues.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 03:46 PM
2

In the article posted here, the one woman was at first only accompanying the other to the police station, but once there decided that she, too, would report rape. I forget which one of them is the radical feminist who published an article about how to exact revenge on men and was thrown out of Cuba for subversive activity. I'm sorry, but Julian stuck his dick in crazy -- two crazies, to be exact.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 02:30 PM
13

Is it like telling your partner that you're on the Pill when you've stopped taking it because you've decided you want a baby, and have maybe even convinced yourself that he'll be thrilled once you've told him that you're pregnant?
/r/MensRights03/12/10 02:27 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 11:39 PM
1

"Suicides." P.S. I'm not trying to be fair; I'm trying to be sarcastic in response to the "2/3rds of men..." I don't know if her statistic is true or not, but what's the point: that men are bad, bad, bad? People who kill themselves are often times crazy, or have gone temporarily crazy; and crazy people -- men or women, both -- do crazy things.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:56 PM
3

We can thank men for their sense of justice. You see, I'm reminded of the women -- mothers, actually -- who get it into their heads that they should kill themselves, but think how horrible it would be for their children to go through life without a mother. So, they then kill the children. However, once the kids are gone, they suddenly don't feel like killing themselves any more. Then, society has to go through the trouble of trying and convicting these murderers. The men you refer to, whether yo…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 03:25 PM
4

But, don't you see? The "patriarchal hegemony" has these poor women brainwashed to where they're alienated from their own group-interests. We bad man are really quite sly. The poor dears!
/r/MensRights01/12/10 03:22 PM
1

I worry not so much about a professional army as I do our increasing use of mercenaries. The United States of America should be using zero mercenaries.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 03:20 PM
1

Okay, you seem prepared. Get the word out!
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:35 PM
5

Here's her crisis. She's full of herself, a real narcissist. If her husband is on the couch watching television, or in the kitchen experimenting with some gourmet recipe, or -- heaven forbid -- home and engaged in some kind of hobby, then it's a constant affront to her need for attention. How dare he? So, she'd just as soon be rid of him. Men have made a huge mistake buying the large screen TV's and whatnot. There's a reason men used to go out after work, or go out after dinner, or disappear int…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:00 PM
3

Be prepared for what will happen. They'll go on having their kids, adopting them or through artificial insemination or through one-night stands, and then they will push for political reforms to have the state provide more and more of the monetary support necessary for raising children -- health care, child care, year-round public schools, more maternity leave, and so forth. There is more of them than there are of us, and there are plenty of male saps who will vote with them. It could get ugly.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:57 PM
1

Your point is valid, and I think the researcher's point stands if we drop the "sexual" part of harassment. For all we know, the editor or the article's author put that subtitle in. Here's the larger point: Men always subjected each other to abusive, intimidating and degrading treatment at work. It is part of their reaction to competitive situations. Men are not treating women differently when they harass them. They do it because they are not discriminating, Dr Kanazawa says. If men act now in th…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:34 PM
5

As women fled, men started to pick up the slack. And Julia Child welcomed them on her famous cooking show, The French Chef, [...] “Men always have more imagination and daring than women—even if I do say so.” Here's what I get. Betty Friedan and the rest of the feminists considered kitchen duties to be among the "forced vapidity" that women were shackled with. This article is basically complaining that men in the kitchen turn it into a creative outlet, while the women wish they would just open up…
/r/MensRights29/11/10 09:33 PM
1

I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 07:59 PM
1

You hear people say things like, you just can't please 'em. Of course, there's no reason at all to say a thing like that.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 07:02 PM
2

And let it be Schrödinger's hermaphrodite: we wouldn't know which gender the person identified with.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 06:58 PM
6

Today there would be roughly 15 dead women coal miners in New Zealand.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:04 AM
2

It's not quite Mark Twain, but there's some painful truth to it.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 04:20 PM
1

I would think that an argument could be made that that kind of money isn't good for the child. I mean, I know it's hard to believe, but some people are of the opinion that huge amounts of money that you didn't work for sometimes causes trouble in a person's life. Who says that the mother or the child will know how to spend this money responsibly? The damn thing is that as long as you're married, you get to decide just how to spend your money on your child. If you're loaded and decide to live mod…
/r/MensRights22/11/10 04:10 PM
1

And, apparently, given the choice between dealing with some guys playing chess or harassing some woman walking her miniature dogs, the police make the obvious choice.
/r/MensRights21/11/10 07:04 PM
1

I wonder if his name was publicized at the time of the accusation and her name not, because in case you didn't notice her name is not given in the article.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 02:31 PM
1

According to the article, the woman is 31-years-old, has been married 15 years, and her oldest child is 14. Somebody help me with the math.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 02:30 PM
7

You should perhaps ask the cop the same question.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 02:12 PM
2

Are you male or female?
/r/MensRights19/11/10 02:05 PM
2

If 7 officers go to the park, that's more pleasant than some of the other things they could be doing. Of the 7, only one will do the paperwork and appear for the ticket -- and get any overtime for it. This one will be the buddy/stooge of the lieutenant on duty. It's not quite the operation you make it out to be.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 06:22 PM
1

You should also check out the "Flex Your Rights" Web site from the ACLU.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 02:30 PM
44

Okay, all sensationalism aside, let's give the benefit of the doubt to what remains in the article. The chess players asked a park ranger, months ago, if there was a problem with them playing chess in that area, and were told, "Oh no, that's fine, that's only written for pedophiles." (Obviously, the park ranger had no problem and even joked about it.) The parents, again, if we're to believe the article, had no problem with the men playing chess. So, what's the problem? The problem -- and here I'…
/r/MensRights18/11/10 02:19 PM
2

I think he introduced himself as "David" or something like that: what would be taken clearly as a non-Arab, Jewish name, in the context. In any case, not to get to far afield from the original subject, but, I don't see how the Israeli decision can be made on the basis of religion, unless it's some kind of cafeteria Judaism where they pick and choose what they like. I'm not Jewish, nor am I any expert in the religion, but I would think that not being married, the woman would have no business slee…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 09:30 PM
1

while still fully benefiting from the support of the opposite gender... Not to mention the relatively huge welfare state, where you can fully benefit from those who are employed full time, while you "ride your bicycle" and "play with children," as the article notes. When want security. That's in them. Men want to distinguish themselves, to thereby better attract women. Put up a huge welfare state and, all else being equal, I find it no surprise that, generally speaking, women would be happier wo…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 09:08 PM
3

Let's hope that the jury doesn't decide that the "poor woman is sick" and that she "needs help."
/r/MensRights17/11/10 08:36 PM
2

From the blog post: The next step for feminists is to introduce the concept of retroactively revocable consent, which means that if consent were based on some misunderstanding or falsehood, it can be retroactively revoked and what at first was a consensual encounter becomes rape after the fact. I agree with you that that's editorializing. I was a bit put off by it. But, I was reminded of the story that took place in Israel of the Arab man who was put on trial for rape because he had allowed a Je…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 08:04 PM
2

Let me explain the difference between the two campaigns. Prostate cancer affects men. Men start a campaign. The campaign consists of the following. "Dude, I got this prostate cancer thing going. You want to donate any money? (YES/NO) Cool." Breast cancer affects women. Women start a campaign. The campaign consists of the following: "Okay, ladies, what are we going to do for our campaign? Ribbons! ("Yay!") Bake sale at work! (Squeals of delight and volunteers who just can't wait to try their brow…
/r/MensRights16/11/10 10:01 PM
1

Is this a joke? I mean, what's with the photo series where he gets his butch on? Poor bastard!
/r/MensRights12/11/10 06:18 PM
2

I'm not going to read this, because I suspect that "having considered suicide" is a way to get some buzz going when you have a new album being released and are trying to revive a career, and don't have the luxury of announcing that you're coming out as gay.
/r/MensRights12/11/10 06:15 PM
1

The original article concerns people treating marriage as a bigger step, requiring a checklist that needs to be satisfied, than having a child. I'm sorry, but bringing a human life into this world is a bigger step. Moreover, the article seemed to suggest that it was talking about adults who were already cohabiting -- adults for whom marriage was a "big step" but babies were not. I think that's different than 16-year-olds getting pregnant. This is a completely separate issue, but since we're touc…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 09:18 PM
2

This crazy person makes it seem that women shouldn't be held to the basic standards of human ethics because they have been historically oppressed. I pointed this out the last time this article was posted. It's no coincidence that paternity has always been uncertain and that women have been historically oppressed. Veils and burqas, rules against going out in public without a chaperon, and even things like genital mutilation (aka "female circumcision") are largely efforts to keep women from strayi…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 07:07 PM
2

If the husband had an affair, impregnated his mistress, and she died in childbirth, leaving the baby surviving, the man ought to bring the baby home to his wife to be raised as their own in a "single home with loving parents"; yes?
/r/MensRights09/11/10 07:04 PM
4

If a man in turn bashed her head in with a big tree branch, that too would be basic primate behavior. I can understand it, but we don't for a minute entertain the idea that civilized society should allow it. I think the same standard should be applied here.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 07:01 PM
1

When you have a kid, the arbitrary goals ought to go right out the window. You can toss them as you're marching down the aisle.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 12:45 PM
1

Pamela J. Smock, director of the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan, said many people delayed marriage until they had achieved a basic level of economic security. “Economic situations really matter for people getting married,” she said. “Many people say they will not get married unless they can have a wedding and a savings account, but they might have a child in a cohabiting relationship. That’s become almost a mainstream way of starting a family, with less stigmatization th…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 09:08 PM
5

It took 10 seconds of Googling, lazy bones! Here you go.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 07:53 PM
0

You say you won custody. Is this full custody, with her having visitation rights? Because if it is, this sounds like one of those arrangements most women have where they decide to deprive their ex-husbands of their visitation (so-called) rights and never get in trouble for it. If that's the case, call your ex. Don't start a fight. Stay on message. Just tell her you understand that the youngest has been sleeping with the two of them and that this is 100% totally unacceptable and non-negotiable. S…
/r/MensRights04/11/10 02:59 PM
1

If they couldn't come to an agreement, [the judge] told them she could rule the dog didn't belong to either one and it would go to animal control. The judge hedged on this one. She should have taken a page out of King Solomon's book and ruled that the dog be put down right then and there in the courtroom. The party that cries out to have the other keep the dog gets the dog.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 05:35 PM
16

The relationship the mother is describing in the article is one of psychological incest, and it's unconscionable. Where is her adult relationship? That's the question I would like to have answered. Women like her decide they don't like their husbands, or don't need a husband, and raise their own little Frankenstein monster to revolve around their world and satisfy their own emotional needs. Frankly, women like these are emotionally stunted. When the boy grows up, women are going to decide that h…
/r/MensRights03/11/10 05:31 PM
12

Paternity testing should represent liberation for women. I would think that all of the historical oppression against women -- from veils, to restrictions against walking about without an escort, to female genital mutilation (aka, "circumcision") -- boils down to the effort of men trying to ensure the paternity of the children they raise. Make paternity certain. It's a shame we couldn't have done this 50,000 years ago.
/r/MensRights02/11/10 05:59 PM
0

You seem rather anti-intellectual. Please choose another career.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 01:23 PM
1

Do you know what battered women have in common? They just don't LISTEN!!!! Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-!!!!! (Actually, some "jokes" aren't funny at all.)
/r/MensRights01/11/10 01:22 PM
1

My girlfriend had a male gynecologist for something like 20 or 25 years, until he retired a couple of years ago after a long and successful career. She even used to laugh that the guy was big like a walrus with a mustache to match and used to like to chew on unlit cigars. Obviously, that's not a description you would use to sell someone on his services. But, she said he came highly recommended, and she found the recommendation to be true: he listened intently, and he took whatever time was neede…
/r/MensRights01/11/10 01:18 PM
2

I really don't care that you hit her in this case. Your bigger mistake was to play along with her theatrics. You "barged" her? One "pardon me" and then you just keep right on walking. There is never any reason for more than that. She got what she wanted, thanks to you. She caused a scene and was the center of attention; and for the rest of the night, very likely, as she told and retold this story. You just keep thinking on that until it sinks in. And next time, don't play along. Let her hire som…
/r/MensRights31/10/10 12:55 PM
3

You point out that not hitting a woman in this particular case would be patronizing.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 12:49 PM
12

Let me say something very unpopular. Women look to provoke men. Some do this simply because their half of our species is more demonstrably emotional than ours, and the fact that men don't emote more drives them crazy. So, they learn to push our buttons, and in their own strange way they enjoy pushing our buttons. Some women go so far to do this even when they know they're going to get hit for "mouthing off" like this. In their own strange way, these women prefer this to male "coldness." So, I wo…
/r/MensRights29/10/10 01:00 AM
0

Can we make it “manly” (or even better, “gender neutral”) to spend a day with a child, or earn less money but have more family time, or be the only parent at a parent-teacher conference because your wife has a meeting? No, we can't. We can't because women won't have it. Generally speaking, they resent when they have to shoulder half or more of the financial burden, and it breeds contempt towards their man; and they feel guilty when they can't spend time with the children, especially if on accoun…
/r/MensRights25/10/10 01:13 AM
1

The thing to have done would have been to get the couple to have posted a $100K bond, contingent on the non-parent half of the couple adopting the child when it was born. I don't think you can adopt a child before it's born, so the guy would be at risk until the adoption was actually performed. So, I think it's fair to ask that the couple post a bond more or less equal to how much this guy would be on the hook for should the adoption never happen and child support be sought. I'm not a lawyer, so…
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:20 PM
5

Let's assume this is true, just on the face of it. What about the girls? It's fair to ask what's in it for them? Do they perhaps suffer? That said, let's turn back to the original issue. What does "improve boys' behavior" mean? Ritalin improves boys' behavior -- if you ask some people. Perhaps boys shouldn't be in an environment like the one set up in elementary school. I had an education professor, a man in his 70's who had taught at the university for over 40 years, who made the following rema…
/r/MensRights21/10/10 04:20 PM
7

The biggest shame is when the goals don't change but are simply transferred to the kids, as evidenced by some of the insane "sports dads" out there.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 01:08 PM
2

All the better if he is a doctor. They're hardly ever home, and when they do come home, they bring plenty of money with them.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 12:53 PM
8

And in all fairness it's not just women, people in general can be like this. Nevertheless, we're talking about women here. It's just a stupidly conceived study, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 06:59 PM
42

Each participant answered various questions relating to her own altruism. They were then asked if those same traits would be desirable in a future mate. What women say and what women do, are not necessarily the same thing.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 03:26 PM
4

Average math skills are irrelevant. Came here to say exactly that; and you know what, my math skills are nothing to brag about. I've read somewhere that you find more men at both extremes in all sorts of categories, whereas you find many more women in the hump of the bell curve. Men are are nature's double down, "I'm-feeling-lucky" roll of the dice; women are nature's safe bet.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 12:59 PM
2

The superintendent is an asshole. That said, at what time do you think they should open the door, and whose job should it be to supervise the kids?
/r/MensRights15/10/10 08:09 PM
2

You're not breaking any news to me. I have said nothing about the grammatical correctness of the word. My point is that no one with any sense of style says stupider.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 01:23 PM
7

The reality now is a lot of people don't read anymore. Everything is so accessible. So guys are getting stupider and stupider." -- Kristen My dear Kristen, what could possibly sound more stupid than your use of language?
/r/MensRights13/10/10 08:26 PM
1

It really must be a kind of thrill we men just don't understand to have all these little shared secrets among your grrrls. Oh, the joy!
/r/MensRights13/10/10 08:22 PM
2

Perhaps there is a distinction between "mad" and "angry." His point was that you always remain in control.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 06:04 PM
1

I blame the public schools.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 01:35 PM
1

The movie HR showed me explained that at one time the standard for what constituted sexual harassment was what "any reasonable person" would deem, but that it's since been changed to what "any reasonable woman" would consider sexual harassment. I kid you not.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 01:21 PM
1

tl;dr Very emotional.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 01:19 PM
8

What I think is outrageous is that you hear people criticize homeschooling as not offering the child the proper social environment -- as if school is largely anything but a more tepid version of a Lord of the Flies environment. It is unnatural to shove so many kids together and basically alienate them from adult society. If anything, it's antisocial.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 03:32 PM
13

Several women tried to shame them (be a man)... These women should be shamed right back. They ought to act more like a man, instead of turning hysterical.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 03:26 PM
14

Poor little dainty women like these shouldn't be allowed to jump out of airplanes in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 04:44 PM
9

From the OP: but their use of language is wrapped up in pedantry, sarcasm and passive-aggression. Honestly, I don't think this is any better when you think about it a little bit. For the record, I'm against both the above and using "bitches" and "cunts."
/r/MensRights30/09/10 01:15 PM
1

[I]s there a marriage industry out there selling them the idea of marriage? You need only peruse the space devoted to bridal magazines at your local Barnes & Noble magazine rack, or turn on the television. "Say Yes To The Dress," anyone? Or just take a look at 20-something women once one of their friends gets married. That's a cottage industry and marketing machine in and of itself.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 02:46 PM
1

I found it.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 01:52 AM
1

Hooray! I found it!
/r/MensRights29/09/10 01:49 AM
1

It was, roughly speaking, anthropology. It was a very long talk or lecture. I'll be damned if I can't find it in my bookmarks somewhere.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 01:47 AM
1

No, that's not it, but thanks for that. This was a very long piece that I think was given as a talk -- I don't know where. The guy may have been a college professor. I don't know. The gist of the article was my third paragraph. As much as I can remember, men are meant to strive, at great risk to themselves, to seek status and accomplishment in the material world. The downside of this, genetically, is that nature is willing to take a big chance on us, a gamble. It doesn't mind that boy babies hav…
/r/MensRights29/09/10 01:46 AM
2

Does anybody have a link to the talk (or essay) I'm about to describe. I read it sometime ago, but I can't find the link to it in my bookmarks. Basically, the talk discussed how civilization is dependent on men. That men are evolutionarily predisposed to striving, to the point where you find men on the extremes -- super-geniuses and morons -- more so than you do women. Competition and achievement is in our DNA, since the successful man can impregnate many women. Women, on the other hand, are bui…
/r/MensRights28/09/10 07:57 PM
2

Well, I did tell him to take his vicarious sense of superiority elsewhere! Honestly, though, I'm sure he just realized that he was down-voted so far that no one would be reading his post, and that he would have hopes of a greater audience elsewhere. He seems like some kind of wacky troll to me. I see other replies on this thread that seem to think that he may very well be a troll, someone who is acting as obnoxious as possible as a way of slandering the subreddit itself. Oh, well. If that's true…
/r/MensRights23/09/10 02:41 PM
1

Who is that?
/r/MensRights23/09/10 02:36 PM
9

No, I'm sorry. Overwhelmingly, men are better at women at the majority of physical tests. Anyone who is arguing otherwise is fooling themselves. Nevertheless, I am in awe of many women athletes. You know why? Because we're individuals -- all of us. And when a man jumps high, or runs fast or far, or races a car, or shoots a clay pigeon out of the sky, that's got nothing to do with me. The same goes for women. I don't care that some particular man can jump higher, run faster, and so forth, than so…
/r/MensRights23/09/10 01:29 AM
15

[O]ne appeal women's races have for [men] is the shot at a better finish. Men who ran in the middle of a pack of guys can finish near the top of a field teeming with women. Okay, I have nothing against the men running; but what does winning this prize mean? Would you run in the Special Olympics next?
/r/MensRights22/09/10 06:18 PM
2

So what? The remote possibility of this should be explained, and if people wish to challenge the DNA results, they can test for that, too. Without checking the statistics on both, I feel very sure that the father being a chimera is far less likely than him being a cuckold.
/r/MensRights20/09/10 02:24 PM
1

Perhaps trolls should pay child support.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 02:38 PM
27

However, using the fact that she's bi-polar as an excuse for breaking up with her would be the smart thing to do.
/r/MensRights16/09/10 06:49 PM
26

"Sugar and spice, and everything nice..." Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you in a nutshell the intellectual sophistication of Ms. Ensler.
/r/MensRights15/09/10 03:53 PM
28

Women worried about "birth rape" ought to go have their children out in the rice paddies -- the natural way. Forget those doctors and their patriarchal medicine.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 02:00 AM
2

Is anyone surprised? It's Afghanistan. What would you expect? At age 5 they're too young to fuck.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 07:38 PM
-1

I thought the same thing: Pederasty In Ancient Greece (Wikipedia).
/r/MensRights07/09/10 05:23 PM
5

This is a bad comparison to compare childless women to all men, and it effectively means nothing. It's making a news story to sell papers -- women earn more! -- by faulty statistical reasoning.
/r/MensRights05/09/10 12:54 PM
7

Fair enough. And you're right about their near-criminal behavior.
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:50 PM
13

I was selectively bulimic in those days. [...] I preferred the happier, less uptight [drunken] version of myself, especially in the company of teenage boys. Let's just cut to the chase. The writer was a messed up teenage girl rife with emotional and psychological conflict. She drank to feel cool and escape her nagging sense of insecurity. And when she went into the woods, she wanted to and didn't want to. Afterwards, the guilt made her crazy, and so she "decided" she was raped to absolve herself…
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:47 PM
8

[W]e can't help feeling that with the pressure from her boyfriend, her family and her perceived judging of her friends... If you ask me, I can't help but suspect the possibility that the sex was likely consensual until her boyfriend found out, at which point she decided it was better to say that it was rape.
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:43 PM
4

I narrowly escaped being gang rapped at the age of 15 by three college guys. It was New Years in Time Square... Sorry, but you lost me right there. At 15, you should have been watching the ball come down on the television in your living room.
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:39 PM
17

I had an education professor in graduate school. The guy had been teaching at the university for over 30 years. He was a very bright guy in his early 70's. I heard that when he was younger he was one of the stars in the faculty. He was still very sharp. Anyway, one day he commented -- with that wonderful "I've stopped giving a fuck" attitude that old people tend to develop -- that elementary school was geared up for girls. It was mainly about "keeping a neat notebook," and so forth. Of course, t…
/r/MensRights01/09/10 05:15 PM
2

[A] woman taking your last name is simply archaic and unnecessary. Like engagement rings?
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:16 PM
4

Why is that, i wonder? Because there's no math involved.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 03:18 PM
4

The same man who can't get a hard-on for his 50-year-old wife may very well be able to get one for an 18-year-old senior high school girl. Better that you should give him the Viagra.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 08:49 PM
3

I put the lead there just to establish some context for the article, but you're reading too much into it. The article touches on single-parenthood from the get go. The truth is that when mommy or daddy have a dynamic love life, it's generally harmful to the child. When children grow up without a committed adult relationship to serve as a model, it's generally harmful to the child. I'm pretty sure Dan Quayle wouldn't agree, but I'd much rather see a child raised by homosexual couple in a committe…
/r/MensRights12/08/10 06:25 PM
7

This is an article that originally appeared in the The Atlantic Monthly: "Dan Quayle was right" (The title refers to the "Murphy Brown" controversy from the 1980's.) Here's the lead: After decades of public dispute about so-called family diversity, the evidence from social-science research is coming in: The dissolution of two-parent families, though it may benefit the adults involved, is harmful to many children, and dramatically undermines our society.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 10:42 PM
2

In these instances women are not interested in what you really think; they only want reassurance that you find them beautiful.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 11:24 AM
0

There is only one correct answer to questions like these, but let me illustrate that with a little story. Years ago, when I was much younger, I had a very pretty, 19-year-old girlfriend say to me that her sister and mother told her that her boobs sagged. She then asked me, "Do my boobs sag?" The truth is that her boobs, while quite lovely, did sag a little bit. But, at the time she asked this she was naked and on top of me, which clearly communicated to me what was at stake depending on how I an…
/r/MensRights10/08/10 04:21 PM
1

Not only that, but what he said was far more accurate than what she said.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 03:05 AM
16

As far as I can tell it was because he was a man. I'm no fan of the cops, but it sounds like you're jumping to conclusions.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 04:33 PM
2

The sex therefore was obtained under false pretenses... I realize that this is all a rationalization to convict an Arab for having the balls to bang a Jewish girl. Nevertheless, if the rationale quoted above were sincere and made more widely applicable, we men would have a field day, and any woman wearing so much as support hose would be guilty should they get us into bed. Do we see how silly this all is?
/r/MensRights06/08/10 09:10 PM
1

I don't blame feminism for this, other than contributing to the general "men are bad" sentiment, which it undeniably does. I primarily blame the media. Apparently, the country is as safe as it was 50 or 60 years ago regarding child abductions and pedophile strangers -- but, of course, thanks to the media "today we live in a different world."
/r/MensRights03/08/10 03:41 PM
6

We men just love how our desire to be able to interact socially as full-fledged members of this "it takes a village" makes us suspect as criminals.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 02:34 PM
2

You know, in cultures all over the world, much of the customs concerning women ultimately stem from the issue of cuckolding. This is the ultimate rationale for burqas in Arab countries, female genital mutilation in Africa, Hasidic women wearing wigs, so on and so forth. Cultures try to either make women less attractive or less interested in sex. This is very much in part to lessen the chance that a man is stuck raising a child that is not his own. These things are only the most obvious ways that…
/r/MensRights02/08/10 03:22 PM
1

You may have made it up, as far as you know; but you didn't make it up.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 01:51 PM
1

According to some, at one time women did rule the world -- back when humanity lived in matriarchal societies, god was a woman, and home was a cave.
/r/MensRights28/07/10 08:45 PM
10

Didn't you read the part where she said she was "truly sorry"? Come on, it's not like she had a weapon -- or a penis.
/r/MensRights28/07/10 02:59 PM
7

The matter was publicized by blogger Joakim Ramstedt, who alleges that his government health benefits were then revoked because of his blogging ... This is the part that, if true, I find most intriguing.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 05:45 PM
2

Men who take time off from work to raise children are viewed as lacking ambition. If a woman has a gap on her resumé that is explained by child rearing, that's understandable; if a man has the same gap on his, that's a red flag.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 01:22 PM
-1

There is no "chance" that a man might become a parent. There is a chance that the sex might result in the woman becoming pregnant, but whether or not the child is born is 100% the choice of the woman. If the choice is 100%, the the responsibility should be 100%.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 01:15 PM
-8

2xc -- is this our model? Stoop, much?
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:42 PM
3

Oy vey! Imagine what the judge would have done if the Palestinian had told the girl he was a doctor!
/r/MensRights21/07/10 01:39 PM
2

You don't have to "understand her perception of it."
/r/MensRights30/06/10 03:38 PM
0

Honestly, it was the boyfriend's duty to smack her after she struck you.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 03:33 PM
1

What makes someone think they can interject into a conversation, start an argument, and then physically assault me? The women's studies nonsense in college. It's a big self-righteous circle-jerk.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 03:30 PM
15

[T]hese disturbing pictures of 29 year old Kim Kardashian and 16 year old teen heartthrob Justin Bieber ... What I find most disturbing is that it's obvious Ms. Kardashian has not come to terms with her lesbianism, and is therefore chasing the nearest substitute.
/r/MensRights26/06/10 06:05 AM
1

All else being equal women tend to have the advantage, as they're the choosers. I find it interesting that once the social milieu is skewed to where it gives the advantage to men, women are now the "victims."
/r/seduction24/06/10 03:56 PM
2

He doesn't want to infringe upon his ex-wife's chances to find happiness ... If he's willing to sacrifice his own happiness, there is not much we can do for him.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:34 PM
1

[P]oor women from the delta certainly can't get to it. Is there no bus route?
/r/MensRights17/06/10 05:23 PM
1

Since we have not yet successfully demonstrated how to otherwise fund a government, almost everyone accepts the necessity of some taxation. Nonetheless, taxation is a form of subjugation. So, I find the phrase "anti-tax nazi" rather ironic. What does an anti-tax nazi do? Storm into people's homes in the middle of the night, demanding that they keep more of the money they've earned?
/r/MensRights17/06/10 05:20 PM
4

How is it that when I try to use my flexible spending health care Visa, I have to document every purchase that isn't made at a special point-of-sale device -- that's if the purchase is approved in the first place. They bust my balls and ask for documentation when I visit the dentist's office, for crying out loud.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 05:06 PM
1

The answer is still that the man disown his responsibility, if he chooses. If the woman can't get the man to pay for an abortion, or half an abortion, or if she can't hock a piece of jewelry, or borrow the money, or if she can't take a bus or a train or have a friend drive her to wherever there is an abortion provider, then she should give the kid up for adoption.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 10:17 AM
1

It is not sensible to assume that if two people are having sex, that they both want children. We have, through modern technology, severed the inextricable connection between sex and the birthing of offspring. Sex is no longer the cause of birth, as it is with animals. Sex leads only as far as pregnancy. Carrying a pregnancy to full term is now a deliberate choice. We no longer live like animals. We have entered a new age. On a side note, it's ironic that you think considering marriage as an inst…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 01:18 AM
0

That would be a better argument if children were affordable to all men. But it's not.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 01:13 AM
1

I'm saying that marriage is recognized as a legal framework within which children born to a couple are automatically the responsibility of both. This is what marriage has been about since its inception. No? Outside of this established legal framework, it's sensible to presume that neither wants children. The woman positively expresses her desire to have children by having them; for the man, he needs to declare that he wishes to have them. I think it's only fair that a woman should have to formal…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 12:08 AM
1

By exercising her exclusive right to whether or not the child comes into this world, the mother has incurred an exclusive obligation to the child. The child's rights are a claim only against that obligation. A man could still choose to "do the right thing" (my patronizing for-the-sake-of-argument concession to common parlance), in which case the child would then have a claim against the father as well as the mother. Of course, within the context of marriage there would be no right for a father t…
/r/MensRights16/06/10 07:40 PM
1

All while punishing the dumbest and least responsible women and their children(and those unwilling to abort for personal or religious reason). Nobody is punishing anyone. The women you describe are making bad decisions, but since whether or not a baby comes into this world is 100% their decision, justice demands that the consequences fall to them. Outside of marriage, men should have the right to disown unwanted children.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 07:15 PM
1

Do you mean to say wouldn't women in choosing to birth a baby after the father has exercised his reproductive rights be dooming the children to an unequal situation? Perhaps it would mean that. I would hope most women would then do the responsible thing.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 07:12 PM
1

Women now have full control over reproduction; as such, they ought to have full responsibility. What would happen? We would have justice -- end of story.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 07:09 PM
1

I have a subscription to the Atlantic. I read both this article and the current cover story: The End of Men. It's generally a good magazine, but it's not above trolling. Picking on men -- as skewed as your writing may be -- is relatively profitable and uncontroversial, sadly.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 07:08 PM
2

Just got back. The signal-to-noise ratio there is very low. How many off-topic responses can you count?
/r/MensRights15/06/10 07:24 PM
1

If we took a survey of the inventions of only the last 20 years, what would be your best guess as to the breakdown by sex?
/r/MensRights14/06/10 06:00 PM
1

I wouldn't go grabbing anyone's ass, and this guy deserved what he got. But, as "sexual harassment" is open to interpretation, I'll say this much. She'd better have something roughly equivalent to Iron Mike's left hook or right uppercut if she's going to go Tyson on me.
/r/MensRights19/05/10 08:39 PM
13

Turning the "people are born this way" thing on its head, I sometimes ask people "What man would choose to be straight? It's just too hard."
/r/MensRights08/02/10 01:47 AM
16

Isn't the standard of measurement obvious? It's "enough" when the woman of the house says so. I'm being serious. This point came up in an article I read maybe 10 years ago in Ms. Magazine. Believe it or not, the article was sympathetic to men. The gist of the article, as I remember it, is that men and women see the home, and home-making, very differently. Here was an example. The children come home from school. Mom serves them milk and cookies -- the milk poured into a pitcher, the cookies on a …
/r/MensRights08/02/10 01:38 AM
3

To hear them tell it, we once lived in a matriarchal society, when "God was a woman." Near as I can tell, it was right around the time we lived in caves. If we're going to hold up "vulnerability" and "emotionality" as the height of human standards, we'll be once again living in caves -- and it won't take long.
/r/MensRights04/02/10 08:13 PM
1

What husband who is a breadwinner insists on everything being solely in his name? There are still a few, but I would think very few in this day and age. But, the mindset described above is something I'm very willing to believe is the norm, when the gender roles are reversed.
/r/MensRights20/01/10 03:22 PM
4

Before anyone gets too excited, they ought to take a look at this magazine article from New York Magazine. It would seem that beta men have a tough time with their alpha women.
/r/MensRights19/01/10 06:58 PM
3

I'm going by memory of the occurrence from a few years back, so I could be mistaken. But I seem to remember that there was a push to take the guns away from people who had ever been involved in domestic violence calls. At the time, the police union was clamoring for an exemption for its members, on account that a significant number would be unable to continue to do their jobs. News flash: an indecent number of cops beat their wives.
/r/MensRights05/01/10 07:40 PM
1

If you're talking about something like being caught with deleted files on your hard drive that were inadvertently downloaded when you thought you were downloading legitimate, adult pornography, I'm with you there. Other than something along those lines, I'm not sure I follow you.
/r/MensRights31/12/09 07:39 PM
1

Why is it if the father is unwilling or unable to "be a parent" -- which generally translates to paying child support -- he's thrown in jail? My point is if a drug user can't care for her kids, she should be thrown in jail.
/r/MensRights11/12/09 04:18 PM
5

Thanks, officer.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 04:52 PM
1

Is that you, Mr. Connery?
/r/MensRights09/12/09 04:51 PM
2

Yes, what you've summed up is the bulk of what he's saying. That part, I would say, is more generally palatable. But, I can't read his comment on family and society any differently. And I'm not saying he's wrong. Obviously, individual women can do very well in what is traditionally considered a "man's world," just as individual men can do well in what is traditionally considered a "woman's world." But I think what he's saying is that you can be the greatest interpersonal communicator and a very …
/r/MensRights08/12/09 02:02 PM
3

It seems like part of his argument is that evolution has made men and women each have a different set of concerns, and a psychology that reflects these concerns. Simply put (or, at tad over-simply put), women are concerned with family; men are concerned with society. There is more scope regarding society (or culture, or civilization) than there is for the close-knit, interpersonal relationship of familial relations. So, men have gotten what they wanted, and women have gotten what they wanted. On…
/r/MensRights07/12/09 07:07 PM
4

This is what Arc90's "Readability was made for. Don't read long articles online without it.
/r/MensRights07/12/09 04:56 PM
3

Here's the money quote: Why does society consider it more moral for you to break up a marriage, go through a divorce, disrupt your children’s lives maybe forever, just to be able to fuck someone with whom the fucking is going to get just as boring as it was with the first person before long?
/r/MensRights29/11/09 11:07 PM
23

[D]o we seriously think that a female teacher sleeping with a male pupil is on a par with a male teacher sleeping with a girl pupil? I don't. And neither, I'd wager, would most 15-year-old boys. [Emphasis, mine] Should policy be based on the mindset of 15-year-old boys? This article is disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/11/09 07:28 PM
22

That certainly would be the speculation if a man wrote a column saying that some 15-year-old girls were sex-crazed Lolitas.
/r/MensRights29/11/09 07:27 PM
1

In other countries over-the-counter genetic tests are illegal because they consider a woman's ability to dupe her man into raising her bastard child as being worth more than a man's right to know the truth. Fixed That For Them.
/r/MensRights25/11/09 04:15 PM
1

I tip my hat to you, sir.
/r/MensRights20/11/09 07:51 PM
1

So, in the interests of society and equity, we should vilify women en masse and give the average Joe a break.
/r/MensRights17/11/09 02:51 AM
8

Dr Theresa Gannon -- senior lecturer in forensic psychology at the University of Kent -- says society risks coming to a standstill if people become so cautious they feel unable to trust anybody with their children. Hmmmm. This is suddenly worth mentioning now that women sex offenders has reached the public's consciousness.
/r/MensRights15/11/09 02:37 PM
-1

Pics, or it didn't happen!
/r/MensRights11/11/09 01:32 AM
1

Fair enough. You took the most eye-catching -- some would say, "inflammatory" -- excerpt from the blog article; but the article makes good points.
/r/MensRights10/11/09 06:17 PM
2

How about you rephrase the question and make it more general? People are put behind bars for years and are later vindicated. Then we find out that the prosecutor knew all along that there was other evidence or that the evidence he presented was suspect but suppressed the pertinent information to gain a conviction. In most of these cases, the prosecutor doesn't even get so much as a slap on the wrist. Are you for people "taking the law into their own hands" in cases like these? We're of course in…
/r/MensRights10/11/09 04:53 PM
1

That "Gender Genie," however, usually thinks I'm a woman from my writing. Of course, you don't know whether I am or not, but I assure you it's got it wrong ;-)
/r/MensRights10/11/09 12:33 PM
1

I'm positive.
/r/MensRights10/11/09 12:31 PM
1

You know, I realize that this is more or less a parlor game, but I fed the blog entry to the Gender Genie, and the application weighted the writing towards the author being male. Now, I don't know the blog's author from Adam, but when I was reading it I wondered if it wasn't written by a male. Don't get me wrong, I'm not disagreeing with anything she's written. I remember a young lady I worked with -- a bisexual, "you go, grrrrl" type of gal -- telling me, with no real hint of embarrassment, tha…
/r/MensRights10/11/09 01:09 AM
7

The attack boils down to this. That nut who shot up the women's aerobics class in Binghamton, NY published his diary online saying how he was mad at women. That's evidence that we're going to see more of these kinds of nuts, because men's rights activists are mad at women and are promoting the same kind of hate. In other words, some nut with a gun publishes his "manifesto," much like a certain nut with mail bombs did some years ago. That particular nut was against technology and human "encroachm…
/r/MensRights07/11/09 11:18 PM
1

You're absolutely right. But my point is that the pay that comes with certain jobs is often because the jobs require a certain kind of skill, or that the jobs are disagreeable, or even dangerous. There are just some jobs that seem better suited to men. I think it's a crock that "equality" demands that women get the same job and the same pay, even when they're unable to do the same job.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 09:32 PM
2

Or, allow only women to haul garbage, fight fires, and so forth, and see how that works out for society.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 09:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter