TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dynablayde Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by Dynablayde on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ya know, it is possible to say something and have no memory of it, it's the entire reason blackout drunk people end up doing stupid shit yet are surprised when they are shown video of them doing it.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:48 AM
1

Realistically speaking the answer is yes and no. The modern idea of the oppressed woman and the reasons for that perceived (and to be fair, real) oppression can be traced back to when the Catholic Church in the west became the major political and social power. The church proclaimed God as the law and because they were the spokesmen for God they were by proxy also the law, from this they set about altering the social structures based on their interpretations of holy texts and an aversion to scien…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 09:15 PM
7

The context in summary is: He's in one party (Republican equivalent) and she is in another (Democrat equivalent) and neither like each other, so they both take turns being condescending to each other during these parliamentary hearings.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:05 PM
1

This is from Australia, where student debt exists but isn't the same as the US.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:57 PM
0

From the Australian Law Reform Commission: 25.10 The penetrative sexual offence is described as: ‘rape’ in Victoria,[13] Queensland,[14] South Australia[15] and Tasmania;[16] ‘sexual assault’ in NSW;[17] ‘sexual intercourse without consent’ in the ACT and the Northern Territory;[18] and ‘sexual penetration without consent’ in Western Australia.[19] The offence includes the continuation of sexual intercourse after penetration in order to address cases where consent has subsequently been withdrawn…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:50 AM
3

After reading the study the only way I could justify a rule 5 deletion is by the omission of the relevant statistics being from the UK. Given the normal TIL fare it's hardly a valid reason to delete.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:14 AM
9

It seems that a great number of people posting in that thread treat the 7yo boy in question as if he were a 36yo man who has "privilege" out the arse and essentially ignore the nature of children to assess their situation in a relative vacuum. Seems to me that a lot of people aren't aware that the phrase "In the past women were treated X way" doesn't actually help their cause for "equality", it just makes it a competition that they're hell bent on winning. If they were desperate for equality the…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:37 PM
2

Pretty good start, but I'd be much happier if the Government's Royal Commission into "Family violence" didn't take the narrative of "men are the perpetrators and we need to get tougher on them".
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:17 AM
1

It's not, but given the lack of information available to try and work out the sex divide on reddit, it's as close to the best of a bad situation as one can get. That said, very few people use gender flairs when they're available so take it with an ocean of salt.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:23 AM
1

Says at the bottom of one of the images, users with gendered flairs on: askmen, askwomen, tall, and short were used to create a map of gender distribution on the other subs.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:13 AM
1

This argument of "Ironic misandry" suffers from a bad case of "If it looks like shit, smells like shit, tastes like shit, but doesn't feel like shit then it's probably shit" which is, I think, the real irony of the situation.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:23 AM
2

Tepid water, so you can really savor the disappointment.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:07 PM
1

If you want to compare the suffering of a soldier who went through the worst and the suffering of a rape victim I'm afraid it's impossible The first quote doesn't work with the second quote. rape victims have it worse.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:28 PM
4

Why do you assume that the men who died in war/conflict were volunteers? In most conflicts around the globe today the fighters are conscripted from the general populace by the rule of "Shoot them, or we shoot you". Hell, you also seem to conflate all rape with violent rape. I have no idea about the percentage difference between violent rape and non-violent rape, but all I ever hear about is the non-violent kind, which I'm willing to be is FAR less traumatic than the violent kind.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:24 PM
1

/r/AskWomen might be able to provide some better targeted answers if you're interested.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:17 PM
1

Easily solved by buying the re-usable version from the same brand.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:03 AM
1

Not quite, one can survive many stab wounds in the chest cavity so long as nothing truly important is damaged, mostly because there is a lot of "empty" space in there, most of the time the biggest threats are internal bleeding and shock.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:29 PM
-3

I'm not a racist. But No, you really are.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 07:12 AM
-1

Feminist sciences... no, but instead to have medical science split into male and female medicine. As many diseases and medications affect us differently which makes the practice of lumping us together seem archaic, after all, the Y chromosome of men doesn't just affect our genitals, it affects everything about our physiology and to some degree psychology.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:10 AM
9

Don't act as though men haven't got the loudest voice in media, politics and society Men might, the MRM doesn't, conflating the two is a disservice to both. Wow really ok good. Guess you suppose feminism is far-right then too (you probably do, which is staggeringly hilarious). Any refutation you'd use to argue against feminism as a whole not being far-right can almost certainly be used by the MRM to the same effect.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:30 AM
1

We've always kept slaves in my family, and it will remain that way. Fortunately, that's our right in my country. Said no-one today (in the USA) for obvious reasons, and hopefully for MGM in the near future.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:10 AM
1

Basically, if the number of ladies in the house is equal to or greater than the number of dudes, the seat stays down, period. To make keeping the seat up worthwhile, men have to outnumber women by a certain ratio. For example, in a house with four guys, they only get to keep the seat up when there are two or fewer girls; for five guys, three or fewer girls. (#5) Only takes into account the NEED to sit, rather than the desire to sit (I.E. I prefer to sit while pissing, but I don't NEED to).
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:52 AM
2

They may be reviewed... but humans are great at making (actual) mistakes or "mistakes".
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:11 AM
5

It seems like every couple of months a western first world country decides to implement some form of mandatory internet filtering, despite the industry telling them (loudly) that it won't work. From what it sounds like, it looks at domain names and possibly text based content, so "rape" in the URL would probably get flagged and possibly ignored if it's about pottery appreciation (as an example). But any site that isn't blatantly obvious about its intentions through the domain name is going to gh…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:27 AM
12

In relation to the dollar donation, does she actually have to physically donate the money, or can it be circumvented by setting up an automatic deposit on the date?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:50 AM
2

Reasonable use of force is generally meant as the use of force that restrains the aggressor or causes them to back off, but ALSO doesn't endanger the aggressor, I.E. if it was your intention to knock out the aggressor and they hit their head on a sharp piece of concrete, you will be the one prosecuted. In the video, the crowd used reasonable force to restrain the woman, had the victim done what is being suggested and intentionally "knocked her out" then in most parts of the western world he woul…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:54 AM
2

It's pretty hard to say endemic when you're looking though a microscope at specific events rather than the whole. As far as I'm concerned, it just shows the problem with using meaningless titles/labels to define ones identity. Gamer has about as much meaning as nerd or geek in today's culture, a vague definition that seems to change from person to person, group to group, but lack any form of consistency. It also begs the question, what labels do you draw the line at for "needing to die" or rathe…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:41 AM
3

In addition to what others have suggested, take photographic evidence of injury caused by physical abuse, both minor and major as it helps with time stamping dates and times it's occurred.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:42 AM
0

If Atheists are at 0 for the belief in the non-existence of deities and theists are at 1 for the belief in the existence of one (or more) deities, and that agnostics occupy the space between 1 and 0 an agnostic cannot fully become 1 or 0 while truly maintaining agnosticism. It would be illogical to make the statement "I don't know if apples exist, but I know apples can be red" as the second part of the statement requires the acceptance that apples exist to be able to make a statement on the char…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:45 AM
1

You do realize that it doesn't have to mean anything TO YOU right? An opinion is a personally held belief about a subject that isn't inherently right or wrong, it just is. Answering the question "Do you believe in god?" with Ice-cream is far more relevant to the discussion because I at least possess proof of the existence of ice-cream in some commonly accepted form, where as I have no evidence for anything related to "god(s)" so as much as your counter-argument was designed to make me look fooli…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:21 AM
-2

All of the above... but seriously, a 'none' option would be nice.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:58 PM
-1

In some ways yes, however by accepting that there are only three options you effectively kill off skepticism.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 12:53 PM
0

In short, I'm skeptical of all views. And no that doesn't make me an atheist given that atheism is the opposite of theism, neither of which gel very well with true skepticism given that both require you to hold a view without anything resembling proof.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:07 AM
-1

Yes but only if you follow a religion, I don't, but I also reject atheism and agnosticism for similar reasons as my rejection of religion.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:37 AM
1

Blank page, thus infinite possibility... am I doing it wrong?
/r/MensRights13/12/13 07:37 AM
1

Let's be honest here, this is trying to push the boundaries of common convention, which may produce some interesting results. It's more likely however that it will go nowhere, but that's what happens in the vast majority of academia. Asking pointless questions to get pointless answers that maybe someone somewhere can use to further advance the sum total of human knowledge.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 06:58 AM
3

Assumes that having no religion automatically makes me an atheist or agnostic... terrible. That aside I got -10.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:36 AM
5

I'm all for financial abortion rather than requesting an abortion that will almost certainly be denied (assuming the woman wants to keep the baby).
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:31 PM
1

Level 1 tech support ("Is the power turned on?") is still a tech job, which very much could account for the increase, too bad the article doesn't really say whether it's "skilled" positions that are being filled by women.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 09:01 AM
1

"The number of enrolments in IT university degrees has fallen by more than 30 per cent in the past decade and Australia will face a significant deficit in the number of professionals in the information and communications technology sector if the trend isn't reversed." And yet you still can't get a job as a fresh uni graduate because the industry has something against training people.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:17 AM
1

In all honesty he's unlikely to do anything... unless it's to throw boat loads of money at them, just to show he doesn't have a "woman problem."
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:39 AM
1

If women don't get special treatment then the feminist lobby groups complain, if they do get "special" treatment then the same groups complain. It's impossible to score when there aren't any goal posts in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:57 AM
3

The problem with that is fact that you double the spending on character development because you would need to provide female voice acting (given that most "popular" games are VA'd) as well as new textures, art, modeling, scripts, animations and a gender neutral story, or tailor the story to be gender specific which raises the cost even further.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter