TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DyslexicBrad Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by DyslexicBrad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think they're pointing out the hypocrisy inherent in being able to deny BC, which can be a medical necessity, while making a joke about denying Viagra gets you fired. Should both be undeniable? Yes. The entire issue is that one is and one isn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/22 11:50 AM
1

Lmao standing in front of a touchscreen and pressing the burger buttons is not work and the length you go to to justify it as work is hilarious. Ordering burgers is not work, spin it any way you want.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 02:49 PM
2

I value actual work But it is actual work? Like, just as much as any acting or modelling job is. They go in, play their role, and produce artistic product that people pay for. Hot take to call porn art, I know, but it's accurate. It's all well and good for you that you wouldn't personally do it, I wouldn't either, but to call sex work "not actual work" doesn't exactly fit your stance of "not having anything wrong with people doing sexwork".
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 11:42 AM
1

How is it only relevant about the most powerful, and not the least? Because the question is, "who is in power?" Take the Vatican City. The majority of depression, suicides, and homelessness comes from Christians. That doesn't make the Vatican City not a theocratic society. Like in England? Up until 2011? Yes. Succession was largely governed by male-preference cognatic primogeniture, under which sons inherit before daughters, and elder children inherit before younger ones of the same gender. The …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/21 06:33 PM
1

when a Republican man sees a male Democrat elected President, they're not thinking "Yes! One of us!" I wanna challenge this point. Why do you think that is? You are obviously suggesting that it's because men don't see each other as sharing "being a man" as a trait in common, but I really do want to challenge the thought. Personally, I believe that the reason why men don't see it as a "one of us" situation, is because men being the president is the "default". There's never been a woman president.…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/21 06:09 PM
13

We watched the same interview right? Hell, this clip is just JP going off and missing the point entirely. "Men suffer more than women is his rebuttal", but that doesn't make it not a patriarchal society? "You're taking a tiny substrata of the population and applying it to everyone" no, it's taking the relevant substrata (those with power) and using it to define how power in our society is distributed. Those with power are overwhelmingly men who have historically obtained that power through inher…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/21 02:45 PM
1

Yeah "comes off as sexist" is just so so close.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 12:34 PM
2

Yeah see, comments like this are what make the above one hard to tell.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 09:15 AM
0

Bruh moment when you're gay and called a simp lmfao. How TF is it possible for me to simp? Even if I wasn't gay as a rainbow, Brock turner sexually assaulted someone. It's fucked to say that humping a blacked-out unconscious person is anything else.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:14 PM
-5

So apparently if your partner falls asleep during sex, you're a rapist I mean if you keep going? Yeah? I've known relationships to end over literally this exact situation because they felt like they were taken advantage of. If there was no consent at the time of the act, it's sexual assault/rape. That's not true. Literally no-one thinks this. You can have pre-established consent. It's literally how BDSM works. The difference being you consent to the exact situation. You can consent to having sex…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 09:54 AM
3

She was unconscious. It doesn't matter if she enthusiastically gave consent to begin with, continuing when someone is unconscious is sexual assault. Based on that logic your girlfriend waking you up with a BJ is also considered sexual assault. Literally yes. That's completely correct. If you've consented to being woken up with a bj, then that's fine. If you have previously consented to a bj and then she gives you one while you're asleep it is indeed sexual assault. Obviously part of sexual assau…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:57 AM
-116

Or the commenter is underage and Elon was (faux) flirting with them. Which is, y'know, the actual case here
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/19 12:20 PM
1

Prevailing feminist theory actually addresses these issues directly. Feminism the ideology (not to be mistaken with feminism the movement) is about gender roles and abolishing them for equality and it posits that the majority of these female privileges are the result of gender roles and that by abolishing them, these rates will even out.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:28 AM
6

He's a Holocaust denier and a Nazi lmao. Example
/r/MensRights30/05/19 05:47 AM
1

The patriarchy doesn't say that there is a group of men running the show and that all men are in on it, it's that the system of power favours men over women by subscribing to traditional gender roles. Same as elephants have a matriarchal system of power. Just because men are favoured, doesn't mean that all men are favoured, nor does it mean that men are evil. In fact, most men kinda get fucked over by the patriarchy. High rates of male imprisonment and low rates of female imprisonment, women get…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/19 02:05 AM
1

Yeah women do receive a lighter sentencing. This is an issue caused by patriarchy believing women can't be punished as harshly as men. It is a case of female privilege and also argued against by feminists. Missing part of the headline is that over 90% of the population is male (which is an issue of itself). So really it's that straight people sexually abuse prisoners more than gay ones. It's not exactly a case of privilege either? Again, well over 90% of the populations are male. And if you look…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/19 03:09 AM
0

Not a wage gap. An income gap. Which does exist. The average income of a woman is lower than that of a man. Women choosing to go into lower paying fields has as much to do with upbringing as it does anything else and should absolutely be addressed. Noone is saying that men aren't also abused by partners. The difference is in the severity of abuse. 1 in 4 women have been severely abused compared to 1 in 7 men. The numbers only get close if you include all forms of violence such as pushing or grab…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 02:56 AM
1

Please prove, objectively, how men are overall better off than women? I'd love to see your list of countries where men aren't allowed outside of the house without a woman. Where men can't drive. Where women are the ones who hold a majority of the power, both political and fiscal. Wait. Are you saying that men have legitimate grievances about their rights but women don't? Is that what you're saying? I'd love to hear about how women having a lower rate of independence, a higher rate of domestic vi…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/19 01:06 PM
0

The only person proven wrong here is the other guy. I am the only one who has provided evidence showing that the other is wrong. I'm arguing in good faith. I'm saying that criticisms are valid. But if the guy is just going to lie about laws which are easily searchable then that's just stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/19 12:44 PM
0

If feminism could just do whatever they wanted, the draft would be gone. The whole point is that they can't and are fighting to accomplish this. If you read your own bloody link you'd see that the feminist fighting against women being in the draft is arguing that nobody should be able to be drafted, but that if the draft exists, then women should have to do it too. Your own source proves you wrong here. "If men have to do it, women should have to do it as well. But in my feminist opinion, no one…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/19 04:26 AM
0

They don't pose the opposite point. They're not doing it out of maliciousness but out of belief in gender roles. They fight for the right to vote for obvious reasons, and don't fight to be drafted because they believe that the draft should be abolished so why fight for something you think shouldn't exist? I'm assuming you're talking about earl Silverman? He didn't get shut down because of feminists, he got shut down because he opened a private shelter but couldn't get the funds together. And you…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 08:32 PM
1

Or, the loud and mysandrist examples are spread more than the far more numerous not-mysandrist ones. Look up the cgp grey video on thought germs for examples of how this works
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 11:00 AM
2

I read the link. My point is that these things aren't acts because of someone's subscription to feminism, they're actions undertaken in spite of it. Why would a woman say that a man must've wanted sex so it couldn't be rape? Why would anyone think that a man can't be abused by a woman? Or that a man can't need help with homelessness? Or that men should be the providers of child support to women who should take care of the child? Could it be, possibly, maybe, bear with me here, because of societa…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 09:54 AM
1

Read more feminist literature and you'll see that you're very wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 08:16 AM
-3

It's not a no true Scotsman fallacy. I'm not arguing that "all feminists are working for good and no real feminist wouldn't", I'm arguing "the core tenets and beliefs of feminism are equality." Showing that some people who are feminists are shitty or don't act in a way that matches with the ideology and using that to decry feminism is a call to authority. (Which is why I called your list ridiculous, because it's a logical fallacy in itself) Feminist theory states that the cause of men fighting n…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 08:14 AM
-2

Eh, they're called feminists because they believe that overall women are worse-off than men. The goal is egalitarianism, but the intermediate steps are mostly about feminism. On top of that renaming movements is very hard without destroying said movement, and a lot of ""centrists"" already claim to be egalitarian while absolutely not being so, which makes it very difficult for a splinter group who tries to identify as egalitarian. And of course the same argument could be raised against MRA group…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 06:10 AM
-3

Of course people will use any ideology to push their own shit. Look at Christianity which espouses love and forgiveness for all and then look at how some christians are homophobic bigoted pieces of shit who use their religion to excuse themselves. The goal of feminism is the reduction/destruction of the patriarchy, not the destruction of men. Using a list such as this is ridiculous, just as using a list of misogyny by MRA groups to detract from their ideas and ideals is ridiculous.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 06:06 AM
2

Good thing that a single self-identified feminist =/= prevailing feminist ideology. Go read up on some feminist literature and you'll quickly realise that MRAs and feminists are literally fighting with each other to solve the same problems that face men.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 05:02 AM
1

Shit like this shows how people don't even bother reading the other sides views and arguments. Modern feminism isn't about bringing about the downfall of men, it's about bringing about the downfall of the patriarchy which is a subtle difference but it is very important. The idea of a patriarchy isn't just men above women, it's men in positions of power over women (or the majority of the 1% being men). And it's about the reinforcement of gender roles such as "men should be the ones to suffer over…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 03:07 AM
1

You are the one who made the claim. Evidence is the burden of the claimant. That study just says that women communicate more than men while men are more conflict focused than women and are more averse to conflict with women. It doesn't say anything about how a woman affects a male-dominated circle. Literally 50%. The odds are exactly 50% that it would be a woman. And the actual discussion is about scouts. Argument went > name one example of women destroying an organisation by being included > us…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 11:01 AM
1

I guarantee if you gave it a go you could find some. It's not like science actually strays from testing something for fear of political correctness and even if it did, there's still decades of well documented scientific research from back in the days where political correctness wasn't even a phrase that existed. If you read the anecdote and not the opinion afterwards the story is basically "someone complained about poor service". If you think that's unique to women then boy oh boy have you got a…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 05:27 AM
0

Wow in the face of such rigorous scientific approach as "I will never respect a woman as much as I will a man" I must concede that you areclearly correct and that simply by existing women are truly destroying the very fabric of society! I truly can't believe that I never saw this before. How lucky for you and convenient for your cause that no evidence of change is required other than a single rhetoric-filled think piece masquerading as a scientific report that states so factually that "women cha…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:46 AM
-9

Also everyone here is ignoring the fact that the Scouts movement is globally mostly a co-ed thing and America is one of the last Western countries to allow girls in scouts. Coming from Australia it's been co-ed here for over 25 years and definitely hasn't suffered for it. The idea that boy scouts becoming co-ed is an attack on men's groups is laughable. Name how the rules have changed now that women are allowed in? Name where women have asked for men to be kicked out of scouts? Such a ludicrous …
/r/MensRights13/05/19 02:53 AM
2

Louis CK didn't do it as a joke lmao. He would just whip it out. That's sexual misconduct and he openly admitted to it and said it was a problem. Someone not leaving doesn't mean he a) didn't do it or b) that she consented to it. Tiger Woods didn't "like to have too much sex" he cheated on his wife with ten other women. It also didn't ruin him for a decade lmfao. He took a hiatus for 6 months but had back issues and ended up requiring multiple back surgeries. THAT ruined him for almost a decade.…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:46 PM
2

Cari B *said she did something. C'mon bro it's not in a court of law or anything. She's a rapper. If every rapper got time for shit they said they did without proof, they'd all be locked up for life man. Should it be ignored? Of course not. But should she go to jail? Also absolutely not.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter