TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

E-2-butene Archive

View 22 posts and 6,490 comments by E-2-butene on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
320

More purge baitE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:55 PM
304

PuuuurgeE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:57 PM
146

Not another purge post!E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:45 PM
121

ScienceE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:08 PM
117

ScienceE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:26 PM
95

Purge?E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:28 PM
92

Purge? Purge.E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:00 AM
61

E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 09:06 PM
57

Puuuuurge!E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:16 PM
49

Puuuurge!E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:12 PM
26

ScienceE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:37 PM
23

Puuuurge!E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:46 PM
19

DiscussionE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 06:51 PM
12

ScienceE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:57 AM
12

E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 09:08 PM
10

ScienceE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:08 AM
10

PURGE PURGE PURGE PURGE PURGEE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 02:35 PM
6

Totally not purge baitE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:57 PM
3

110% Purge BaitE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:00 AM
2

Puuuuurge!!!E-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 12:56 AM
1

Something something purge postE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:56 PM
0

ScienceE-2-butene/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:03 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 6,490 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Are you sure? I thought the kind of love girls get on spring break is the purest kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:00 PM
2

Ma’am, objectivity from many women in this sub isn’t possible either. Have you ever tried arguing that a woman might have done anything wrong? Some of them make the men seem positively reasonable. In a shocking turn of events, it turns out objectivity is a “people” problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:34 PM
1

That’s a good question. I’m not sure off the top of my head. For better or worse, most stats (at least that I’m aware of) tend to look at physical infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:09 PM
2

It’s probably a factor, although relative SMV probably matters more. We have good reason to think men have the advantage as they get older (okcupid stats as a quick example). And this perceived difference seems to play a big role in relationship dissatisfaction, which in turn may precipitate infidelity. We also have to keep in mind that a common avenue for men cheating is prostitutes as well. And you don’t need any SMV to make that happen, just a few hundred bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:07 PM
3

For sure. It could absolutely be a demographic effect where things will even out in the coming years. Unfortunately we won’t really know that until we get there.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 01:24 PM
0

I’m a little rusty on this, but I believe there are multiple explanations. One is the classic evo-psyche style argument where men’s mate value starts to match/exceed their wife more as they get older so they are more inclined to cheat. I’d imagine you also have factors like women drifting further from a man’s ideal age (20s) as they are. Men are also more likely to do stuff like go to prostitutes which plays a pretty big role.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 01:23 PM
22

You see it in most infidelity stats. At least these days, young people cheat approximately the same amount and then older men start outpacing older women. This is the first super quick example I could find, but it’s pretty representative. Iirc younger women cheating as much as men is a newer phenomenon so is this an age thing or a generational/demographic thing? I’m not sure that’s established. But in broad strokes it’s definitely born out statistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 01:11 PM
1

So this sub is more addictive than our friendship? Smh
/r/AllPillDebate28/06/23 05:26 PM
3

This mother fucker betrayed us
/r/AllPillDebate28/06/23 04:05 AM
–

Yea, I wouldn’t want to be in that position. I just feel like a) if this was a prolific problem, we should already be seeing it to some significant extent with images, but we really aren’t and b) to the extent improvements to AI make this easier to do, people will become increasingly skeptical of any video “evidence.”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 09:10 PM
–

It’s not the same because, what, it moves? It’s easier to do? Ultimately both can fake images to appear real when they aren’t. And ultimately both can be decouple with careful analysis. Or not so careful analysis. “I have a mole on my shoulder right here, and it isn’t in the video.”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 09:05 PM
–

Okay, imagine any crime. Now imagine how easy it’s been for me to photoshop a picture of you doing that for the last few decades. Don’t you think photoshop has a lot of implications? Why haven’t we been living in fear for decades now? Oh, that’s right. Because digital forensics can catch edited photographs, and for the most part nobody has sufficient motivation to do it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 09:00 PM
–

Not once deepfakes become commonplace enough that they are common knowledge. You guys act like this stuff is new, but it really isn’t. We have had people faking nudes for ages, deepfakes just make them move. Is some shopped nude gonna make me lose my job? I doubt it. They are usually pretty easy to disprove anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 08:53 PM
–

Then explain the consequences besides “trust me bro.”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 08:51 PM
–

Oh, I totally believe someone could fake my face onto a porn video. What I don’t understand is why I should give a fuck. Cool, send it to my family. “That isn’t me, lol.” Done.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 08:41 PM
–

But how could you be blackmailed by a deep fake if it isn’t real? Oh no! Someone shopped my face into a video of someone else! What ever will I do?! Hell, even if it is real, once deepfakes become commonplace you can just go “nah, that isn’t real. Obvious deepfake.”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 08:33 PM
6

When you phrase it as “high earning men can all get relationships while high earning women can’t,” it really doesn’t have the same ring to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 05:43 AM
1

Oh, yea, we are for sure exactly the same as WW2 Japan and Germany. No differences at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 10:34 PM
1

bunch of women talking about men’s issues It’s worse. It’s a bunch of male feminists talking about men’s issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/23 02:00 AM
2

Most girls I’ve met who are like this don’t seem to give enough of a fuck about their current boyfriend to really care (as long as they secure the upgrade). Every case I’ve personally been involved in was a girl clearly trying to transition into upgrading boyfriends as opposed to simply sleeping with someone. To the point of not even batting an eye as they mention having a boyfriend or talking down about him as they flirt with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 08:58 PM
2

Absolutely. If she’s single, you’re competing with every dude on the market. If she’s taken, you’re competing with one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 08:47 PM
5

How does this solve the problem though? If a guy with the same condition dates her, aren’t they both just pedos then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 08:39 PM
5

You would not use that analogy if you didn’t think they are on the same level. Thanks for the clear demonstration of not understanding how analogies work. Really helps my point. PPD men: “life is like a box of chocolates - you never know what you’re going to get.” PPD women: “bUt LifE and cHoCOlaTe aREn’T EXacTlY tHe sAMe!!!”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 02:34 PM
5

I feel like the married guys who feel the need to “alpha” up their marriage probably don’t have much unruined marriage left to begin with. Married red pill, for example, isn’t attracting men who are trilled with the state of their marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:58 PM
5

The same men: people starving to death is exactly like me not able to get sex. PPD women and not understanding the concept of an analogy, name a more iconic duo.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:52 PM
3

Trolling women is boring. They are way too easy to rile up. It’s way more fun to trigger men. When you get then mad, they get really mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:51 PM
1

Nice, you just had the realization that very few men here are actually red pill. It’s a bunch of purples and blacks trying to apply red pill to achieve blue pill goals. That and tradcons.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 06:43 PM
5

Jokes on you, the virgins are all male incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 03:38 PM
1

What do you think natural selection is? You mean that thing that positively selects for organisms that had sex? Plenty of mentally ill people have sex. “Sex use a positive impact on general well-being” =\= “sex is the only determinant of well-being. But they also help me find jobs and help me get money. Oh, yea, I’ve never heard of people helping their romantic partners either. It’s not like they are even more likely to help and with larger things than platonic friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 01:23 PM
1

It is popularly theorized that homo sapiens became the dominant human species because we were more community based than neanderthals. Fun fact: we also became the dominant species because we had a lot of sex. If “being evolutionarily successful” is your metric for success, I’d say having sex is far better correlated than having friends on the individual level. Other than reproduction, all sex really is give a massive emotional high. Sexual intimacy provides more than just an “emotional high.” Un…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 03:26 PM
3

I think sex (or really romantic intimacy) is a need in the sense that normal socialization and friends are a need. You can’t expect people to just offer to be your friend, and there are a few people who seem to be able to go their whole lives without it and be fine. But your average person will probably come out a little fucked up if they don’t get it. I don’t see anything “entitled” about saying people need friends. Hell, many women here propose it all the time as a stand-in for sex without not…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 01:49 PM
2

Right? This feels like a middle school throwback
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 02:10 PM
1

Since we started shitting on Netflix and video games. Don’t worry, once we go back to discussing MMA or lifting it won’t be necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 02:05 PM
2

Did you just cite a study to me?! Only nerds do that. I bet you have never touched a pussy, nerd.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 01:43 PM
2

The handful of incels are oppressing me. I want to be able to naively visit a debate sub and leave with my views unscathed!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 01:36 PM
3

🤢
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 05:04 AM
–

Rules? What rules are we talking about? Is this a guessing game? What do I win?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 02:00 PM
–

She showed you what kind of person she is. At least you know you didn’t miss out on anything valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 01:37 PM
2

Why would legal prostitution matter when cheating exists?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 02:48 AM
2

He never specified that she stopped right when they got married. She might have been particularly clever and strategically stopped giving BJs only once she had him on the hook for a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 02:35 AM
4

He should have noted that she was perfectly happy giving blow jobs before they were married, but secretly didn’t like it? Are we expecting men to read minds again?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 02:30 AM
5

Scientists have recently discovered a dangerous food that will entirely kill a woman’s libido. Wedding cake!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 02:28 AM
3

I mean, there are a lot of different opinions on what the root cause is. It seems to me that some have more obvious answers than others. If you’re the kind of person who just thinks women being inherently picky is the primary cause, you’re right, a clear resolution for both men and women seems unlikely. Either women have to settle or the men have to be lonely. However, if you’re the sort that thinks the recent increase in lonely men is primarily due to something like women having access to highe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 10:31 PM
3

Slaves? Never! You can’t enslave an object!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 04:40 AM
2

Just like how when I eat a delicious taco, it’s to acquire sustenance and stop my body from deteriorating. We are all truly living on the edge here!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 11:35 PM
7

Oh, it’s definitely true. Why else would girls do nice things for their boyfriends/husbands? When she plans that cute date for you two to go on, it’s a matter of life and death.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 11:22 PM
1

Why is one so different than the other? Both are making significant compromises to get a partner. Do you have a further rationale, or are we just arbitrarily drawing a line somewhere?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 11:13 PM
1

In that case, isn’t it reasonable to conclude that the fundamental issue isn’t actually “economics,” as men are entirely unphased in the face of a minor mismatch. Isn’t the driving issue instead women’s pickiness?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 11:07 PM
3

You realize that rationale works in reverse for the other half of the bell curve, right? There equivalently aren’t enough high tier women to match the high tier men and they are stuck settling for average Beckies. The difference is just that men aren’t obsessed with dating someone better than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 11:01 PM
0

Well the average age of first sex is around 16 or 17, so the average 18 year old has been sexually actively for ~1.5 years and the 21 year old for ~4.5 years. 2-3x seems totally reasonable to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 10:56 PM
–

Well obviously it wouldn’t. Women hate SAHDs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 11:09 PM
–

I wouldn’t say miniskirts are that common. It’s a lot more shorty shorts that let you see her whole ass and leggings that let you see her clitoris.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 10:26 PM
–

RIP humans
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 10:04 PM
–

Im pretty sure these is decent evidence that the color you are wearing can have an effect on how attractive people, so I could see that having some kind of effect. That said, my knee jerk reaction is that relating it to seasons sounds like a bunch of woo.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 09:46 PM
2

Marginally below average people are distressing to you? Jfc.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 12:18 AM
9

If I’m understanding this right, are you pegging 5 (maybe 6) as around the average person? Because if so, the idea of not being friends with a 4 who is a great person seems like madness to me. I’d consider rethinking your priorities in friendship, if so.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 11:08 PM
1

There are almost certainly physical cues people pick up on, actually. To give one example, based on actual research, women with bigger breasts are generally seen as more promiscuous. So that probably plays some role in being in the “sexy” category. I think it’s probably just the divide between (seemingly) promiscuous vs demure women. Or at least the physique cues people read for those traits. So smaller boobs and a rounder/cuter face might be more “pretty” than “sexy.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 03:18 PM
2

Hey babe
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 12:17 AM
3

What do you mean? Isn’t that account just an inspirational quotes bot?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 12:14 AM
2

When he catches your sick, you get the ick.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 11:31 PM
1

They hates Slipthe because she told them the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 10:07 PM
0

He probably deserved it, filthy scrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 09:45 PM
1

God damn it!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 03:13 AM
4

I’m going to need every guy you ever looked at. Don’t cheat me here!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 06:18 PM
2

I’m going to need an “upvotes to posts ratio” metric. I’m being cheated!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 05:10 PM
8

Friend who despises me You do friends differently than me, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 01:17 AM
2

Yep, right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 03:29 PM
1

These stats are based on a study. You can go try to find it and read it if you’re sufficiently motivated. It includes stats on men that the Infograph doesn’t show. Even if you think women have more “real” backups, due to how loose the inclusion criteria in the study were, men reported a high number of backups as well. Maybe you think that’s wrong, but it also draws into question how high women’s numbers are, as they would be overinflated as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:46 PM
3

Hol’ up bro, I got you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 09:09 PM
5

Hot
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:47 PM
8

Because I get paid to wear a fedora around women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:46 PM
10

Back at you
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:43 PM
9

Woman bad. Lmao gottem
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:40 PM
1

Cope
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:30 PM
1

I don’t know how you could say this when you two have identical taste in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:19 PM
1

Spoiler: the definition is fairly loose, and men have almost as many backup partners as women iirc. But yea, let’s just only post the statistics for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:53 PM
8

Me too. It’s hardly relevant to the sub, but I had to upvote it for just being genuinely hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:48 AM
0

No, they are definitely all bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:44 AM
4

Imagine making an actual argument during the purge. Criiiiinge.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:42 AM
5

Why would I treat objects like people?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:26 AM
4

Truly the greatest philosopher of our time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:22 AM
4

They are currently in the process of pretending that they are okay with dating gold diggers to save face. For my next trick, I’ll make a meme shitting on gold diggers and you can watch them all agree that gold diggers are awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:03 AM
4

more wealthy Sus
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:00 AM
6

I prefer the “don’t date gold diggers” option.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:00 AM
1

All I want is a woman who likes me because I’m a rich westerner but doesn’t date me because I’m a rich westerner. Ya know?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:54 PM
1

Ah, but seeing them get mad because it’s so close to the truth is the best part.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:42 PM
2

Urban dictionary defines big dick energy as “The loud and boisterous energy emitted by someone who has a colossal phallus and doesn't have to tell anyone about it.” But, oh yea, small dick energy totally isn’t something like “the lack of energy emitted by someone with a tiny penis.” Nothing to see here, definitely no negative associations with small dicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:40 PM
4

How dare you, sir! We should strive to be thought provoking while shitposting.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:32 PM
0

Im into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:15 PM
3

“Try listening.”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:10 PM
3

Is she single?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:16 PM
8

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:48 PM
8

So, on an unrelated note, how do you get your armor so shiny and white, lift? It’s almost blinding.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:06 PM
16

I’m really not sure if this crosses the line from “humble brag” to just “brag.”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:51 PM
11

Ah, I’m just retarded and can’t read. 👍 I really don’t see what you’re getting at with your second point though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:09 PM
12

Don’t worry, it’s just the trauma. It’s what happens when you argue here for too long and get one too many of these after a high effort, thoroughly cited post.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:04 PM
2

Why would you insure your phone when you can fix it yourself? Everyone is doing it these days, apparently!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:45 PM
7

Dis u?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:44 PM
6

Oh, my bad. Here I thought apple was making plenty of money repairing their products. I must be the only one. You guys fixing your own iPhones are so smart!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:43 PM
1

People who post on alts during the purge are betas. Can’t cmv
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:41 PM
20

You mean something like the old woman in the bottom right? Hell, you could replace them with dudes and it still seems pretty nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:38 PM
10

Wow, did you come up with that insult all by yourself? Im so proud of you!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:32 PM
8

Pretty sure that’s because big corporations like apple are making it increasingly difficult for independent people to work on their stuff. Not because everyone is a savant fixing their own iPhone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:31 PM
26

Hot
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:25 PM
4

Which one? 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:24 PM
16

Weird, I could have sworn computer repair was still a booming business.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:21 PM
13

Being told you’re smart because you completed a complex task that most people can’t do is literal oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:15 PM
11

It was a struggle, but I managed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:11 PM
17

Yea, I hate it when people call me smart and handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:04 PM
15

It’s truly a struggle. I don’t know how I’ll cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:04 PM
19

PSA: Even the uglies can compliment me. I need my ego inflated more.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:03 PM
1

Why are you like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 09:31 PM
–

How long is the purge? I need to make sure I don’t finish early.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 09:10 PM
12

Full year
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 09:08 PM
3

Damn straight. I’ve been hoarding material for a literal year.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:49 PM
8

I was noticing the full body tattoos, chains, and history of beating women. You sure you aren’t projecting a bit?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:36 PM
5

Scumbag stacy. It’s always stacy smfh
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:30 PM
21

I’m just getting started, buckle up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:28 PM
4

It’s an antique, aged like fine wine.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:28 PM
7

Hot
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 08:22 PM
8

Stfu, bandit. 6 inches isn’t small.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:02 PM
3

Sounds like oneitis. It might be terminal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 02:09 PM
3

Was? Idgaf she’s 55 here, I’d still hit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 09:33 PM
1

These damn average height men, being short everywhere. Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 09:28 PM
2

😘
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:48 AM
2

Slow day?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:40 AM
3

Stay toxic, king.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 12:57 AM
0

I think it says more about the kinds of men women notice in the first place. If the genuinely nice guy just isn’t in your radar, thats pretty telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 12:42 PM
1

I have never seen women lust over a decent guy. I think the way I’d phrase it is “I haven ever seen women lust over a guy because he is decent.” I’ve seen women lust over guys despite being decent because he has enough other positive traits to still make him attractive, but that’s still damning of being “decent” in its own way. On the other hand, I’ve definitely seen women lust after guys because they aren’t decent…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 12:30 PM
2

No way. It’s probably a lot more like sucking a dick than getting your dick sucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 01:30 AM
2

And here I thought I was going to be your beta bucks and we would live happily ever after. Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 01:11 AM
1

I feel like the people I’ve seen get mad about this, they are specifically mad about “sorry.” They don’t want you apologizing to that person, because that means you might still like them and are only turning them down because you’re taken. It’s nitpicking over “sorry, I’m taken” vs “I’m taken.” They probably think the best answer is, “I’m taken, you stupid bitch,” just to remove any possible ambiguity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 01:11 PM
1

When you say upset, do you mean the people who are like “you should have actually said “no, I have a bf/gf, sorry implies you’re interested?”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 12:51 PM
4

Sadly, I think it’s over. I hope you aren’t allergic to cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 04:26 AM
7

Sorry to hear about the alpha widowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 04:23 AM
1

Nah, it’s the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:59 AM
1

Same thing. She got bored of him playing ball.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:17 AM
1

Just shows she will get bored of you eventually, even if you’re Tom Brady.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:11 AM
2

How dare you call women a hobby! They are more like pets. You don’t own a hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:47 AM
2

Oh, for sure. I agree with the ESH rulings. Sounds like both of them handled things pretty poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 07:58 PM
6

I love the women in the comments adamantly demanding that women definitely, totally don’t care about height. It just so happens that only tall men are confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 07:55 PM
1

So perhaps mentioning baldness is relevant for those who it doesn’t work for? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:51 PM
2

I mean, it’s a decent option, but it’s not like hair loss treatments work for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:46 PM
5

I never troll. I’m always dead serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 09:46 PM
0

I get what you’re saying, I’m just giving you shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 11:48 PM
2

Nice. I’ll be sure to start telling people that I live dangerously because I max out employer price matching on my 401k! 😎😎😎
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 11:46 PM
–

It’s the fact you’re being an edgelord about it, calling it “dangerous.” “I’m saving money for retirement. I’m the baddest motherfucker there is. 😎 “
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 11:40 PM
2

Missed you, baby
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 07:45 PM
5

I for one like women as a hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 07:24 PM
6

Dead wrong! I already finished pooping!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 02:34 PM
2

Oh, you’re talking the girls who fuck guys on the first date “trying to get a relationship?” Yea, that’s a big [redacted C word]. That’s just casual sex with some rationalization behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:41 AM
3

Yea, it’s a possibility, but I’m not really sure how much it changes. On the one hand you might have someone with unrestricted sociosexuality and therefore a high likelihood to cheat. On the other you might have someone with restricted sociosexuality, but who is highly dysfunctional in relationships. I’m not sure I’m all that keen on either option.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:04 AM
2

We all get Jesus’s sloppy seconds, smh
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:33 PM
2

Ha! So it is cuck culture!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:30 PM
2

Is this cuck culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:20 PM
5

starts a troll post with “Non troll post.” Wait, that’s illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:05 PM
4

This is the most poetic justification for sending unsolicited dick pics I’ve ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 07:04 PM
3

It’ll depends pretty heavily on their genetics. I imagine most FTM hormone doses are in the range of a normal adult man, which clearly isn’t causing the beardless guys to grow a beard. You need the hormones, but you also need the receptors to respond well to them. It would probably help low T guys a bit, but some of us are high T and still have shit beards.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 01:53 PM
1

I think she should leave it. Very representative of her personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 12:00 AM
1

If you’re really against it, i also liked another poster’s idea of “i like guys who are [something he obviously is]” or “i only do X when I like a guy” and then do X to him. It’s at least a little more subtle way of getting the same idea across.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 08:18 PM
2

“Hey, I like you.”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 07:43 PM
2

I’m going to assume you’re showing signs of actual depression and not simply sad. 1) Go to the doctor. ASAP. First and foremost, depression should be treated by a medical professional. 2) If your doctor doesn’t suggest it (they likely will), get your blood levels checked to make sure you don’t have any kind of vitamin deficiency. Vitamin D being the most obvious, as deficiencies are quite common. 3) Exercise! I find resistance training works the best, but anything is good. 4) Get outside more. G…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 07:42 PM
2

You like that slight of hand? “Men don’t support women’s rights because they oppose feminists.” Yea… that’s not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 06:44 PM
2

Women lying to me is so hot, though. 🥵
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 06:43 PM
2

This but unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 02:57 PM
3

How unattractive are we taking? If hes pretty normal-ugly, he can go to the gym and lift hard, either shave his head or try hair treatments, shut the fuck up about physics and computer science, get a clean haircut (if he recovers the hair) or grow a beard, learn to dress with some style, and learn game.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 02:50 PM
2

In the former, it’s one category among many. Maybe she likes that you’re tall, handsome, charismatic, assertive, and support. I’m the latter, it’s the primary selling point. You’re supportive, and that feels really nice and she will accept the rest of the package regardless to get that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 02:05 PM
2

You could be the mythical “alpha bucks.” A woman liking you because you are supportive and can provide isn’t the same thing as a woman liking you mostly or almost entirely for those reasons alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:44 PM
2

Wom*n bad, small brain
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:59 PM
2

This guy has to have a humiliation fetish, right?…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:47 PM
3

It’s to try to distract you guy from the argument because we know how unfamiliar you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:35 PM
2

I saw, my comment was kind of a reference to it, lol. Good work linking the study 🫡
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:54 PM
8

Men admit they like muscles and women lie about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:46 PM
2

Imma grown ass man 🧢
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:15 PM
1

Clearly the obsessiveness is perceived as exploitative and predatory to the other party. Sure, but I think this is only for the obsessive types, not the people who just have it as a preference. To go with your gold digger analogy, I don’t find it remotely predatory if a woman expects me to be consistently employed. If she only wants me for a high earning job, though… Even if they “understand the rationale,” they still don’t like it, which leads to feelings of resentment and general bitterness to…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:20 PM
3

For now Yea, this is how I think the quintessential “beta bucks” scenario goes most of the time. I don’t think women are really dating guys they are entirely unattracted to. Rather, they date a guy who is clearly inferior to their previous conquests, but NRE gives enough of a dim glow to the relationship that it’s worth it because he’s such a “good guy.” Unfortunately NRE doesn’t last forever…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:11 PM
5

I will give you one last “women bad” for the road. Godspeed!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:58 PM
5

only value This is always the issue, isn’t it? Yes, it would be terrible to have a partner who only values you for your virginity. But as you alluded to, it almost always sucks to have someone value you for any singular trait. We should just be sure to avoid making the mistake if thinking that because some people obsessively vet on [only X] that vetting on X in general is somehow unreasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:54 PM
1

Red flag? As the old saying goes, "if she smokes, she pokes." Easy win.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:12 AM
2

You should probably be afraid of heart disease and empathetic towards starving children in Africa.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:59 AM
1

Right? Like if you have to actually try, that ship has already sailed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:54 AM
2

Tldr: men’s opinions > women’s opinions
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:18 AM
1

engineers Do… do you know what engineers do? How loosely we are defining “office?”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:05 AM
1

I can and I will. I guess if to you can admit it, lmao. Brain doesn’t work like that. My condolences. Stewart are SUPER attractive men. You don’t think Stewart is attractive? Go search his name on /r/LadyBoners . I’ll wait
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:02 AM
1

You can’t be this obtuse. My point is that being liked only for your sexual appeal is being better than not being liked at all, and your “rebuttal” is to list off attractive, charismatic men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 12:42 AM
1

Oh, yes, Jon Stewart isn’t attractive at all. No women find him physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 12:34 AM
3

I’d rather be Brad Pitt than a not-funny Danny Devito.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 12:29 AM
5

Not as pathetic as not being a sex symbol at all. Whole package > mere sex symbol > nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 12:26 AM
1

You seem fake
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 11:50 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepfake
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 11:43 PM
1

I’m just gonna make sure. You know that’s a deepfake, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 11:11 PM
3

Mgtow is just incels pretending to be volcels
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 08:12 PM
3

The hierarchy isn’t the point, the results it gets are. Oh, absolutely. But that’s kind of what I’m getting at. As OP suggested, the struggling to get sex is an estimation of where one falls on the sexual hierarchy, but that isn’t the only thing that below low on the hierarchy gets you. It might also mean that what intimacy you do get is more unenthusiastic than if you were higher on the hierarchy. And it’s no wonder that stings.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 06:19 PM
0

Everyone talks about being a boob man or butt man. Apparently the real play is to be a gut man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 06:06 PM
3

I’m not sure I’d underestimate his perspective. I think “sexual hierarchy” makes it more clinical than it needs to be, but I think there’s some truth to it, even it it might be better put in terms of intimacy and enthusiasm. I think a lot of guys notice that the same guys who are “getting sex” due to being “high on the hierarchy” are also the ones women are most enthusiastic about and most willing to give intimacy to. Is it any surprise they make the connection?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 06:04 PM
3

I can’t believe you’ve done this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 03:10 PM
3

As the other poster said, deepfake. But basically. I laughed my ass off the first time this was posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 02:58 PM
2

Depends on how delusional the standards are
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 02:06 AM
3

Imagine thinking sex and making out are mutually exclusive. Very slow sex + making out is 🤌
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 01:59 AM
2

Bros before hoes. How could you doom your son by letting these inferior short women give him their genes?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 12:00 AM
3

Sleep? Are thinking of melatonin?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 09:51 PM
2

Melanin itself? Not to my knowledge. It’s just a pigment. I’m not even sure there would be a reasonable mechanism for that. Only thing I can find that would even be remotely plausible is that it can scavenge ROS, but tons of things do that too. Certain demographics high in melanin have, on average, marginally increased testosterone vs others. It’s not enough to really be a big deal on a personal level, but doctors even use different formulas for calculating their renal function due to the elevat…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 09:46 PM
2

Vitruvian Physique and colttaine. That’s about it, I think
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 01:59 PM
3

Eh, I figured that was fine. I want to use it in the more edgy way for people who are desperately trying to rationalize things, but I wouldn’t just drop a “cope” and peace out. It’s just such a fun word.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 01:50 PM
2

Holy shit, I hadn’t read it carefully either! I thought the word cope was banned, but I can tell people they are coping as long as it’s in a high effort post?! This changes everything…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 01:46 PM
4

Yep, exactly. I agree with the other posters here. Let’s say it is pee. Who gives a shit? It’s both very dilute pee, and it shows she was so turned on that she can’t control herself. The former isn’t a big deal and the latter is really hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:41 PM
1

Lol, at least you can recognize that it isn’t actually the physique. Dudes need to block out the faces when they do these tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:04 PM
3

Yep, certainly the “large volume” squirters which were observed in that study. But guessing based on personal existence, even for girls with smaller squirt volumes, it seems like it’s mostly just pee then too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:02 PM
1

I can’t help myself. I swear shaving my chest and stomach makes me look more cut. But I do it for me, not for women! 😤
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 01:59 PM
4

Based on the infamous study which measured it by ultrasound, asking her to pee beforehand doesn’t actually help. Their bladders fill up really fast during sex and then they pee again.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 01:57 PM
2

I think the best part is that your average woman is like “all these men finish too fast” and she’s like “these men can hardly finish at all!” Makes you wonder if it’s actually the men that are the problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:41 AM
4

Don’t get me wrong, I think calling them dad bods is ridiculous. The point is that a sizable number of newspapers, tabloids, and other celebrity news sites unironically called them “dad bods,” showing how skewed a lot of people’s perceptions has become.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:37 AM
3

Yes, but only on my primary alt account, /u/Raspskallion_Pancak3, not this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:25 AM
3

Posts? They were called "dad bods" in actual news articles too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:18 AM
7

Hi, I'm /u/Raspskallion_Pancak3, here to tell you I like being banned and want to be banned for longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:13 AM
1

Overweight is also the main thing that happens when people "stop caring about their appearance."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 01:46 AM
1

Tell that to all the men that lose attraction to their fat wives and all the wives that dead bedroom their fat husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 01:21 AM
1

Yes to the first part, no to the latter part. I can’t imagine why losing attraction to my spouse would ever be a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 01:05 AM
2

Lmfao, I just looked him up. Jfc, this proves OP’s point flawlessly. If this now passes as natural, anything is fair game.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:35 AM
9

Ever since this and this got called “dad bods.”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:32 AM
13

Right? Dudes like Zyzz are “just the right amount of muscle.” But it’s actually worse than that. Women just don’t appreciate how much very low bf% and posing make men look unnatural and how that impacts their perception. Go show a cohort of women off-season, relaxed Chris Bumstead and watch how many say, at worst, “his chest is a little too big, but I love his arms.”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:28 AM
5

And by mine I mean her pussy. I’m really glad you explained that for all of us. I was really confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 10:41 PM
1

You know a lot of chicks with hairy feet too? 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 09:49 PM
2

AMALT
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 09:39 PM
1

theories for physics Astrology, new age woo chemistry Homeopathy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 08:44 PM
3

How can physical attractiveness be real if I look hot to one girl but average to another?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 08:25 PM
1

Is that trolling? I feel like hating on guys getting leg lengthening surgery to get laid is kinda reasonable…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 07:52 PM
2

I wanna fuck you Incredibly telling as far as what your mindset is. You only want to get your dick wet? No shit you don’t particularly care about how her friends might influence her. not like bro is getting married to her. He already asked for an exclusive relationship. He clearly wants something more serious and long term. Whether or not they get married, I doubt he wants someone actively sabotaging it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 07:30 PM
2

It’s dumb, ditzy advice, but it’s still incredibly manipulative. Let’s not downplay that fact. As I said in my other comment, I think he’s overreacting a bit, but no don’t think disliking the fact she has manipulative friends and is easily influenced is unreasonable at all. I don’t think disliking that a girl has shitty friends necessarily implies he doesn’t like her as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 07:19 PM
3

I don’t really feel like having friends that actively encourage you to manipulate someone is a small issue…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 07:13 PM
3

Glad to hear it went reasonably well. I’m ngl, while I think his reaction is a little extreme, I kinda get it. Some girls have friend circles that just drip poison in their ear, and often it eventually dooms a lot of relationship. That might not be quite what is happening in this case, but I get why he doesn’t want a bunch of girls encouraging you to manipulate him. Maybe consider negotiating with him? Would he be okay with you staying friends with them as long as you agreed not to go to them fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 07:10 PM
4

Of course! They want to distribute the means of reproduction!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:26 PM
1

Who is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:26 PM
2

Further proof that all women are bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 02:46 PM
3

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 02:45 PM
3

I tell them to stop filming staged TikToks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 01:09 PM
3

Yea, what the fuck? I skimmed the weekly discussion thread and they are talking about getting fake IDs to show to men. It’s important to be able to lie about your age because you’re also lying about your job, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:22 AM
2

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:05 AM
5

What do you mean by “caring?” It’s totally possible to judge someone as an idiot for their bad decisions while simultaneously not really being invested (read: caring) about what they do on a personal level.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 03:56 AM
2

Eh, if you’re getting it mostly through legit casual, I don’t see that as unable to have a steady relationship; you’re hardly even trying at that point. The second category might not be too far from being the same thing, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 01:16 AM
3

Yea. It’s a hard one. It’s basically “would you rather date someone really promiscuous or an alpha widow(er).” Neither are good options. 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 01:13 AM
1

Also 9/10 gym trainers have no real fitness education and are just roided up monsters. Based. Most of the workouts i see trainers putting people through are dumb as fuck. Googling “starting strength” would get you further than hiring a trainer a huge chunk of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 01:12 AM
2

Oh, damn, this is a really good one. I think I’d go with B? But really reluctantly… In reality I’d be inclined to just stay single, but I know that’s cheating the “would you rather.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 01:10 AM
1

Yea, I’d probably guess not then. Sub 92 lbs sounds tiny for anyone! I’m a pretty normal bf% and can definitely feel mine, but they aren’t exaggerated or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 01:01 AM
1

What do you mean by feel? Like it’s noticeable at all, or you have a super obvious ribcage sticking out? I feel like if you can’t feel it at all you’re probably unhealthily fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 12:55 AM
2

I think it’s true. Have you seen how many low self esteem girls there are out there who tolerate all sorts of ridiculous behavior from men? Main difference is the source of the scarcity imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 12:52 AM
1

Kind of, but not seriously worried. IIRC science shows that the best relationships have something like 20:1 positive:negative interaction ratios. If you're skewing more positive than that, the relationships tend to fail more. However, the reason it's a problem (at least IIRC) has to do with one partner being a pushover, being placating, and eventually resentment building up. If you feel like you're having disagreements but settling them amicably instead of having "real" arguments, you're most li…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:40 PM
1

Go for the long con. Tell her, sleep with her, then tell her she’s too short for an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 08:17 PM
2

I put that more in the health than looks category. On what basis? Setting aside the fact you didn’t even say “health” in the OP, this sounds like a desperate rationalization to save face. Muscle clearly doesn’t work because it’s about health. Marathon runners, for example, are in impeccable cardiovascular shape, yet don’t exactly have a body that screams “sex symbol.” Meanwhile, all of your favorite Hollywood actors that women gush over are blasting unhealthy amounts of steroids to achieve their…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 08:14 PM
1

men are awful I believe the scientific term is “man bad.”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:54 PM
2

Imagine thinking women like muscles. Lol! Everyone knows skinnyfat guys really turn women on because doing nothing is so sexy and masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:53 PM
6

Shitposting is a sign of sanity in PPD. The nutters are the ones that takes it super seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:24 PM
3

Deez nuts, Lmao gottem
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:19 PM
1

No? I always expect shitposting from Rapskallion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:18 PM
3

This but unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:14 PM
5

Ever notice how a disproportionate share of misandrists are also lesbians? Curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:08 PM
2

As the old bodybuilding mantra goes, “abs are made in the kitchen.”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 06:55 PM
3

I’d absolutely be concerned she’s the kind of girl who would “play games,” but I’d still be more inclined to date her than if I thought she didn’t like me at all or if she saw me as a second choice. Most guys hate it when girls play games, but they at least hate that less than if the girl is crushing on someone else. If he’s understanding, he might appreciate that teenage girls tend to give really stupid dating advice. But he also might not be, and I have no way of knowing. To be frank, your fri…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 06:21 PM
5

Yea, I’m getting a little different read than some of the people who say he’s not into it. The fact he’s both blowing you off now and immediately suggested talking to the other guy tells me that he was actually into you, feels hurt that he’s the “second pick,” and is trying to distance himself to avoid having his feelings hurt more. The fact he was driving to visit you before but now “can’t justify driving an hour” is incredibly telling imo. If he isn’t taking the bait, I think you honestly migh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 06:10 PM
2

Wat
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 05:54 PM
4

Shivering chad vs virgin still-sitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 03:21 AM
5

Damn, you beat me to it. Boss telling an employee that some chick in LinkedIn is “obviously down to fuck?” And the kind of woman he decides to tell this to uses words like “hypermisogynistic construct?” Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 03:21 AM
4

Fidgeting burns calories. People who don’t fidget are fatties.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 03:04 AM
10

It’s run by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:54 AM
2

Damn admins, ruining all the fun 😡
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:46 AM
1

Purge wen?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:43 AM
3

Weak bait
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 11:38 PM
1

Gym body is actually attractive and “functional” body copes that they are better at opening pickle jars or some shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 11:27 PM
3

I’m not sure, that’s a tricky one. If you just say it “didn’t work out,” it could come across as him being the second pick, which will turn off a lot of guys as well. I think just not bringing it up would probably be the safer option. How easily he picks up on/acts on it probably has more to do with how shy or experienced he is vs his age. Especially since Covid, a ton of guys in your age group probably don’t have all that much experience either and are still feeling things out as well. It’s goo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 06:45 PM
2

Women and sabotaging their friends, name a more iconic duo.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 06:39 PM
5

/u/TheSinema if you don’t want to explicitly make a move, you could try playing girl games. Make sure to touch him back, say things like “I enjoy spending time with you so much,” “you mean so much to me.” You could hint that you think he’s attractive or that you like guys with [trait he clearly has]. Some 18 year old guys may still be too thick to pick up on it, but the more explicit hints you can give that you like him, the more likely he will pick up on it and make a move. If he’s driving to v…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 06:34 PM
3

Oh Jesus, your friend gives the worst advice ever. Just tell him you’re fucking other dudes next time. I’m sure he will love that. 🙄 “I’m interested in someone else (and implicitly not you)” is the last way to get a ton of guys to make a move on you. Unless you’re already dating him, loads of guys won’t make a fool of themselves by getting jealous over a girl they haven’t established themselves romantically with at all. After all, what is there to gain in making a move on a girl who just told yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 06:13 PM
1

Sure. My point is negative stereotypes around female promiscuity could be relevant if women are being perceived as promiscuous for reason out of their control. Either way, more of a tangent. If you don’t care, you don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:59 PM
1

That’s apparently not the only factor. Previous research has shown that females with large breasts are perceived as being more promiscuous
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:54 PM
1

You don’t think biased perceptions of women’s promiscuity could impact the workplace? Well, I guess if you’re consistent that’s at least something.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:49 PM
1

Let’s stick with the concrete example. How about slut shaming? That’s what dbz was basically doing with his “lock and key” post.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:47 PM
1

What poster? Dbz19_kai? Yes, Dbz. I’m not trying to be a hero. Perfect. So do you also think studies on sexism against women are “useless?” Because that’s literally what you’re trying criticizing me for. Namely, if you aren’t “being a hero” and constantly throwing studies to critique every individual person’s bias, you think the studies are “useless.”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:37 PM
1

My SDE joke isn’t affecting anyone’s employment prospects, Your comment obviously isn’t, but wouldn’t the poster’s presumable sexism be? Analogous to the scenario you’re trying to criticize me for, their biased opinions are the harmful ones, and you should be intellectually critiquing them rather than quipping at them, no? Yet here you are cracking jokes, just like me. a study whose only use could be to fight biases, yet simultaneously cannot be to fight biases, That’s not what I said at all, tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:01 PM
2

I assume you mean with regard to women supposedly not caring about a man’s n-count?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:56 PM
0

You’re playing a game here to try to discredit my position, but it looks quite silly to anyone paying attention. It’s ridiculous to claim that if someone isn’t opening up google scholar any time someone makes a derogatory comment, somehow they aren’t taking their position seriously. That’s a fast track to getting pegged as autistic, but I’m sure we both know that. There are two issues here which you are trying to conflate. One is “is the study of psychological biases useful in general” and the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:49 PM
0

Do you seriously think calling a woman who is shaming men “loose pussy” is a mature way of handling what you’re portraying as a serious topic of dick shaming? Of course not, but it’s funny. And citing studies at some random person in the moment isn’t going to be productive either, anymore than citing studies of psychological bias to a racist will. That doesn’t mean the information isn’t useful outside of a direct confrontation. Do you think calling men “SDE” is a mature way of handling the topic…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:28 PM
0

There are two levels to this. There is how useful information on psychological biases are, and then there is how to deal with people who shame others on the bases of those biases. I made the remark that you could simply quip at dick shaming women instead of citing studies to them. You called this “immature,” yet apparently your quips are slut shaming men are hilarious. Yes, I used the word “shame” first, but pretending either one of those scenarios isn’t shaming is being willfully obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:22 PM
0

So it’s funny when you drop an “SDE” on an dude shaming women, but it’s immature if I drop a “loose pussy energy” on a woman shaming men? I think both are plenty amusing, but can’t help but notice the asymmetry in your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:08 PM
2

That is an incredibly immature way of handling the topic. Lmfao!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:59 PM
2

Some people aggressively calling out every “problematic” behavior doesn’t mean everyone is required to. Besides, you don’t need to autistically tell dick-shaming women that “studies suggest you have a psychological bias” when you can just tell them they sound like they have loose pussy energy, lol. No one can see that unless you’re fucking them Because people never break up or stop seeing each other after having sex. It’s not gonna impact employment or professional opportunities, like racial and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:25 PM
1

Well it’s doing something, because we are talking about it right now, no? You can even find journalistic articles about it in around 2 seconds on google. It’s a little ridiculous to suggest that I, a random poster on Reddit, need to go on a personal crusade to educate the masses in order for any particular line of research to be useful or disseminated. But let’s go back to the question I asked earlier. Do you think studying all psychological biases is a waste of time? Or just this one?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:04 PM
2

It gives us insight into how we form our perceptions, how those perceptions might be biased or inaccurate, and how we might unfairly judge people’s personalities for superficial characteristics independent of said personality. Knowing that information both gives us insight into how we operate on a fundamental level as well as giving us an awareness of particular biases so we might try to consciously see past them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:50 PM
2

The study doesn’t say “women think big dick is better.” It says “women perceive men with bigger dicks to have XYZ positive personality traits.” It’s no different than research shows a similar “halo effect” for attractiveness, where attractive people are perceived to be smarter, more moral, etc. Do you also consider that research a waste of time?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:45 PM
6

Because it’s both interesting and useful to understand how we form our psychological biases?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:34 PM
1

If your girl isn’t typically pleasant and amicable toward you first thing in the morning, I may have some bad news.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:48 PM
1

Yea, iirc it’s something about edibles getting metabolized first pass in the liver and making a unique metabolite.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:40 PM
3

I see that 100 lb slight of hand there 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:40 AM
2

I mean, at a certain point, that’s a difference without a difference. If women use money is a proxy metric for competence, and falling in that metric makes them see you as less dominant/competent, the end result is the same. Tomato tomato. I’d agree with your second point, though. I think as long as the man can compensate in other ways, that can certainly mitigate the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:20 AM
14

You forgot the “woman bad” at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:11 AM
12

So what’s your evidence women actually lie more?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:05 AM
4

I’ll just leave this here. Another important mechanism is the impact of the promotion on the balance of household earnings, and how this impact shifts the division away from social norms. We find that divorce is more common in households in which the wife's promotion shifted the division of earnings (further) away from the norm of male dominance. Further supporting this interpretation is the fact that we found the lowest proportion of divorces of any sub-sample analysis for couples in which a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:01 AM
2

Tbf, they are usually somewhat subtle about it. But it’s always really funny when some girl goes and gets the little, pink 2.5 lb dumbbells and walks them all the way across the gym to the 100+ lb dumbbell area when the place is pretty empty. Women “approaching,” lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 01:26 AM
3

They don’t want unattractive men to approach them, as is tradition. They will follow attractive men around the gym like a lost puppy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 12:30 AM
1

🇺🇸
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 11:28 PM
3

As Yuk said, high protein and continuing to lift hard is most important. Something else you could consider, though, is adding in something like 24-36 hour fasting once per week and then eating at maintenance the other days instead of a standard daily caloric deficit. There’s some evidence it’s more muscle sparing than a constant caloric deficit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 10:10 PM
2

As Yuk said, high protein and continuing to lift hard is most important. Something else you could consider, though, is adding in something like 24-36 hour fasting once per week and then eating at maintenance the other days instead of a standard daily caloric deficit. There’s some evidence it’s more muscle sparing than a constant caloric deficit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 10:10 PM
2

Yea, it’s super subjective. You can even find scientific studies that try to measure it cross-culturally, and there is a lot of variation. It’s kind of funny, most men report not wanting a promiscuous woman, but the bar for that counts as “promiscuous” varies a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 05:13 PM
2

100% parody
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 05:10 PM
3

Attraction isn’t a binary. Some people are “holy shit, I’d crawl over broken glass to suck his dick” hot. Others are “kissing him is fine (as long as NRE lasts anyway)” attractive. I don’t think most women are generally entering relationships with men they are UNattracted to. But men they are far less attracted to than previous partners? Absolutely. And often this more nominal attraction really doesn’t last once familiarity and the stresses of life set in. Beta “bucks” also isn’t just about mone…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 02:55 PM
0

I also just have a really hard time imagining a high tier man who has reached 35, wants kids, but still hasn’t managed to have them. This really feels like unicorn hunting territory.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 02:00 PM
4

This is a grade A humblebrag. 🤌
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:56 PM
5

Well given that having family members is cheating, obviously having friends is cheating too!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:05 PM
1

I’ve been playing through Kingdom Rush whenever I’m bored and traveling lately. Definitely a fun little time killer if you like tower defense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:03 PM
3

No more than women looking for men with traits they don’t have. Height or muscularity would be two examples. Men and women aren’t the same. It’s kind of how things have to work for mating to function at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 09:12 AM
2

Interesting, I’ll have to try to find that. This is the second or third time someone has made the claim people are saying this in the few weeks, but I’ve never seen anyone actually claim it nor provide a source for who is claiming yet. It seemed like a strawman of the already extreme “men peak at 40” claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:01 AM
1

Is someone actually seriously claiming this now?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 02:32 AM
1

It’s 100% leaking. I’ve seen some pretty mainstream fitness channels pushing black pill stuff lately…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 02:55 PM
1

evolutionary psychology Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 02:25 PM
3

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 02:22 PM
3

My masculinity fails all relevant EPA regulations!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 02:01 PM
3

This has been true historically, but holy cow, if you look at the most recent stats, GenZ has changed the game. They are nearly as fat in their teens as millennials in our 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 02:40 AM
1

A small enough amount of shitty food is still a calorie deficit. Healthy foods are good for you, but aren’t the fundamental issue for weight changes. At best they make you less inclined to eat more due to factors like low caloric density.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:57 PM
1

I could see how this would play a role in muscle:fat distribution for consumed food, but that’s different than simply not being able to gain weight. Every well done nutrition trial I’ve seen that bothered to measure it finds weight gain falls perfectly within the confines s of “calories in, calories out.” There’s not much wiggle room for magic around the actual weight gain portion, which is the actual topic of OP’s post. To top it off, we know basically all of the factors you mentioned are media…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:44 PM
1

These can exist, but to my knowledge are generally quite rare. Enough that it’s unlikely to explain the difference between the overwhelming majority of underweight vs normal weight vs fat people. In the same way, thyroid deficiencies exist but are unlikely to be the cause of the current obesity epidemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:25 PM
2

Generally when people say they “eat whatever [they] want,” what they end ends up being eating like a pigeon and consuming a small amount of calories. They might also be super active and just burn everything off. But for all but the super-active, usually when you start making people count calories (and doubly so if they weigh their food), it turns out they have just been under-eating the whole time. Measurements of the heritability of weight gain have a problem in that it’s usually an environment…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:14 PM
3

I mean, while there is some variation in people’s basal metabolisms, it’s usually quite small. It’s unlikely to be a major contributor in people becoming incredibly fat or “unable” to gain weight. Most of the difference comes down to activity level and people being utter dogshit at estimating how many calories they actually eat. Something more than just “metabolism” is amiss if someone can’t simply eat more to compensate for a 10%ish increase in basal metabolic rate (which is only a fraction of …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 05:50 PM
2

You will never achieve it, because I will always be there to push back! A huge, undulating lard ass has nothing in a small, fit butt!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:30 PM
5

I think saying it’s all “self esteem and boundary issues” is a bit of an over-extrapolation, but OP is getting at something I broadly agree with. Iframed it slightly differently here in terms of weakness, but it’s kind of getting at the same idea. Basically, a lot of men will try to do nice things for women, not necessarily because they are just martyrs with no boundaries, but because they want to make the women happy, and (mistakenly) think giving them women what they (think) they want will ach…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:28 PM
5

“CMV Embezzling from your company is okay if you can keep your shareholders happy and they never finds out. You’re merely satisfying your financial desire.” Your argument basically boils down to “anything is okay as long as you’re good at lying about it and nobody out,” which seems obviously false in other contexts. Why not just be forthright, open the relationship instead of dishonestly agree to terms you have no intention of following through on? Then it isn’t cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 12:48 PM
4

Have you heard? Men aren’t allowed to catch feelings. You have to want to fuck her from day 1, otherwise it’s against the rules and you’re being manipulative.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:06 AM
2

Comment on something random in the background
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 02:41 AM
1

Mostly strategy or strategy-esque games, at least lately. Mount and Blade: Bannerlord is the current guilty pleasure
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 02:11 AM
1

I’ll allow it. Light scruff is tolerable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:58 AM
1

That’s different, that’s pure style. Im taking the “look at my big burly beard, I’m a big strong man now” guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:54 AM
1

Do you still play them? Yep. I definitely play them a good bit less, owing to less free time, but I still enjoy them when I get the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:43 AM
2

Ladies, just date men who are clean shaven. Whether it’s a weak jaw or a more general lack of masculinity, men with beards are always compensating.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:28 AM
2

Go see your other girlfriend
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:19 AM
6

Most normie response possible
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:07 AM
2

No, it’s this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 01:04 AM
1

Holy shit, that’s way worse than just “princess.” I didn’t even think it was possible to be that cringey…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 11:13 PM
3

Lmfao, brutal
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 11:04 PM
5

“You’re such a blue pilled cuck. If you were a strong alpha male<sup>tm</sup> I would have dated you, but instead you’re a weak soyboy. Go watch Andrew Tate and maybe some woman will love you eventually.”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 11:03 PM
0

I didn’t think he might. I thought you were full of shit and wanted you to prove it. I do think he’s possessive of women, but it’s disingenuous to call that slavery and a lack of rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 08:12 PM
4

You got a link to where he said that?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 07:02 PM
3

Enough to mog your husband, smh
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 05:34 PM
5

Getting alpha widowed by a figment of your imagination. Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 05:32 PM
1

Because.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 05:28 PM
3

When did the term NO ASS become mainstream?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 05:28 PM
2

I’m not sure it’s normal for accredited psychologists to think about people as kids as much as you seem to… 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:33 PM
6

Nothing. Some people here just like to seek out misery and vent about it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:33 PM
6

No, don’t worry, some of us just had disturbing adulthoods.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:27 PM
0

They are all fat. He probably isn’t overestimating himself tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:27 PM
1

So is being a “dumb jerk and shitty boyfriend,” good or bad? My argument is abstract, it really doesn’t matter what the “bad” category is. It could be a “shitty jerk,” as in OP’s post. It could be emotionally uninvested. It could be abusive. Hell, it could be smelly! It really doesn’t matter. The point is that, statistically, there will inevitably be some guys with [bad trait] who are also more attractive. When men say “girls just chase hot guys with [bad trait],” it’s a statement about how wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:19 PM
1

So basically hot guys are assholes (or “dumb jerks and shitty boyfriends,” to directly quote OP) because having those traits makes them hot? I can at least partially agree with that. But why not actually argue that point with OP? I was basically making an argument about statistical variation between multiple positive traits assuming that her premise (women don’t actually like jerks) was true, but you seem to actually just disagree with her foundational premise entirely. Tbh, in looking back at i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:49 PM
1

I actually really like Carb Manager. It’s a little more aimed at keto, but it’s great for tracking macros and lets you really easily save a lot of recipes and stuff to use later. I found a lot of the nutrition information a lot more reliable than “my fitness pal,” at least when I used it years ago, because it’s a bit less cluttered by user submitted garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:14 PM
1

An average-looking man who happens to be magnetic and funny Okay, so then it stands to reason that a hot man with an average personality would also be a league above the average women? Can we then infer that a hot man with an actively bad personality might drop even further, more into the “average” category, then? Seems perfectly reasonable. exactly what you mean by “shit personality.” Among other things: Mean and callous Literally whatever people mean when they say stuff like “women date hot as…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:01 PM
0

But it seems like you risk making the same assumption that OP is explicitly calling out. That is, that personality and appearance correlate. When view holistically, would an average guy with an average personality not be in a similar league as a hot guy with a shit personality? The latter has a deficit in his personality, but is making up for it with appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 09:38 PM
0

Wouldn’t it make the most sense that it’s middling women? The hottest women can pull the guys that have both good looks and a good personality. It’s the upper-average women who have to start thinking about tradeoffs, because they can’t just get the best. If you that with the fact these guys both likely cycle through relationships faster owing to their shit personality and men tend to date down for more, particularly short-term pairings, I suspect the number is a bit higher than you’re implying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 09:11 PM
2

Sure, and I think that’s a fair distinction to make. But at the same time, I often thing (admittedly crudely phrase) comments to the tune of “women just go for hot assholes,” which I believe are generally aimed at the point I raised are often painted as claiming all hot men are assholes, when I don’t feel like that exactly what they are trying to get across.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 05:28 PM
5

You don’t really need to believe that literally all attractive men are assholes to believe that women would preferentially pick a hot asshole over an average looking “great guy.” There aren’t enough hot, “great guys” to go around, so a large number of women are going to be stuck in the dilemma between choosing a hot asshole or an average looking “great guy.” The question is typically about which decision these women tend to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 05:18 PM
2

NO ASS
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 05:06 PM
2

Laaaaaast
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:06 PM
3

😡
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 03:30 PM
1

😡
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 03:27 PM
1

Actually last
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 03:27 PM
1

Last
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 03:21 PM
2

I think Di Caprio is probably just incredibly superficial and finds young women attractive like most men. But you keep armchair psychologizing if that’s what gets your rocks off.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:12 PM
5

You will date club sluts, and you will like it! 😡
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:02 PM
4

What if that is their worth, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:56 PM
1

Lack of wisdom?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:55 PM
1

You really hate wisdom teeth, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:30 AM
2

Yep. Alex Lawther in End of the Fucking World iirc. I’m hoping for his sake that shot is for season 1, not season 2. Though tbh, I’m not sure he looks all that different now that he’s in his mid 20s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 03:00 AM
2

Considering the “child” was 22, I think that answer that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:58 AM
2

No way. We all know I’m an obese middle aged woman. Not a chance I’d win to Smarmy’s effortless elegance!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 09:11 PM
2

/u/SmarmyPapsmears
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 09:07 PM
2

Kind of? I think the “natural” look absolutely looks the best when compared to heavy makeup, but I think a lot of men are kidding themselves if they think the typical women doesn’t look better with a well done “no makeup” look vs actually wearing no make up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 08:19 PM
6

Ngl, I’m pretty sure this is how a lot of “nice guy”/friendzone situations come about. Guy catches feelings for his female friend, but she has a bf. He’s a good guy and won’t blow up the relationship until she ends it voluntarily. But because women (especially young women) often monkey branch straight out of existing relationships, she ends up dating all of the guys that were willing to blow up her current relationship. The “nice guy” never made a move because there was never a real opportunity …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 07:08 PM
1

I thought women preferred taint cucumbers
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 05:26 PM
2

You can fool me me with your f*male propaganda. I know those videos are edited.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 05:25 PM
6

But they can’t access them without men. Pickle jars are impenetrable to women. Know your worth, gentlemen!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 05:07 PM
1

Tbf, I haven’t read it in several years, so I’m not exactly up to date on the state of it. Regardless, I’m not under the impression they have departed from their “sidebar” framework. Besides, TRP has always been somewhat manic, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:58 PM
1

Yea, I know. It was just an example. Another element probably worth noting is I think a lot of people kind of just spew their own opinions under the umbrella of “red pill,” when, if posting their opinions in some of the proper TRP subs, would get dismissively told “sidebar.” For better or worse, the sidebar pretty nicely grounds TRP beliefs, at least to some extent, yet many people so-called red pill people here seem to not even know it exists, much less know what’s in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:53 PM
2

Woman bad 😡
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:46 PM
6

Well black pill content is banned, so a lot of black pill talking points have become “red pill” as camouflage. Sperging out about “looks only” isn’t TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:30 PM
3

A debate sub is continuing to debate? Weird…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:09 PM
1

I know, I know. She was “thicc” and had a big ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 04:29 AM
3

You can’t post porn of fat chicks, even in posts of sexualized cartoon characters.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 04:16 AM
2

I remember when I used to get tagged in these…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 04:06 AM
3

Seems likely. Check the account age for confirmation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 04:01 AM
4

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:41 AM
3

That ain’t chocolate…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:37 AM
2

I’ll be the beta-est of beta bucks for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:22 AM
2

Never! You’re my kween!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 12:05 AM
1

the guy I was replying to seemed to be operating off a different definition of slut based on something like ‘desire to have sex’, For sure, and it seems super common, especially around here. I feel like people so often take the statements like “men want a woman who is only a slut for him” at face value when, at least in many contexts, i think we should be questioning whether the statement is coherent in the first place. That seemed worth spelling out, at least. post hoc rationalizations to justi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 10:43 PM
1

if a girl was a “slut” just for them they’d be over the moon I feel like this is kind of a word game, though. Being a “slut” is fundamentally about being promiscuous, not necessarily enjoying/having enthusiastic sex. It seems like there’s sometimes this weird assumption baked in that having enthusiastic sex only on committed relationships is just impossible. While I’m sure there’s probably some correlation between liking sex and promiscuity, it’s a little funny to basically say “the men who care…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 10:12 PM
1

Lmfao, are you kidding me? I repeatedly suggest you use a particular strategy that is close to foolproof and you go “yea, but what if I do this other thing?!”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 10:03 PM
1

Copy pasting the dull DOI URL directly into a web browser takes you to the journal page. Yes, this is often paywalled because most journal articles are paywalled to some degree, especially if you’re trying to get direct access. If you post it into google scholar, you can often (but not always) find links freely available through academic institutions. Particular links often get added and removed over time, but maybe 50% of papers will have a functioning link here at any given point in time. If y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 09:44 PM
1

you actually gave the correct link to begin with You completely overestimate people. I’ve also been accused of “not providing sources” because my links went dead. There’s no pleasing people, and providing a source to the DOI is by far the most consistent strategy. But I really just love how you consider hitting ctrl c + ctrl v this arduous task that you is just so far beyond you that you can’t even. The DOI is literally in my link.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 09:19 PM
1

Do you do maintenance on your entire Reddit comment history? I certainly don’t. I’ve also had them go dead in like a few hours. It’s really not practical. you would make it easy for people to get to the important info. For most people, the relevant piece of information IS the most important information. You know how many people on here actually read the methodologies? Very few. Hell, some even pay so little attention they confuse academic articles for journalistic ones. Besides, the direct refer…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 09:07 PM
1

Sci. Hub. Links. Go. Dead. I think I’ve had more successful conversations with a brick wall. Besides, I would have happily linked it to you if you had simply asked, at least in this case because this one turns out not to be paywalled. But you decided passive aggressive shaming was a more reasonable strategy, and I’m not going to hold your hand if that’s your game.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 09:00 PM
0

Thanks, I was about to edit it in to my last comment to you, actually. But thanks for covering it. I just refused to link it to OP at this point on principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:50 PM
1

Because. It. Links. To. The. Relevant. Section. Which. Is. More. Valuable. For. Most. Readers. Also because I expected a modicum of independent thought to anyone who really wanted to look into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:48 PM
0

Are you daft? Projection much? Sci. Hub. In fact, I double checked on this one, and if you paste the FULL CITATION at the top of the page onto google scholar, you can find a PDF of it. This isn’t some big secret conspiracy to hide information. I’d ask if you’re too lazy to paste a reference into google, but I think I know the answer already. If your study is fucking paywalled Im gonna say it again, with feeling. SCI HUB. Paywalled studies aren’t hard to get unless they are very recently publishe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:46 PM
1

Like I said, for one, if you need a sci hub link, they break over time. I’ve had issues linking them in Reddit posts. Second, because one benefit of that link is that it zeroes in on the relevant passage. Typically, people can barely bothered to do more than glance at the paper (relevant?) much less correctly find a particular point that isn’t explicitly spelled out in the title or abstract.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:39 PM
1

That would require you to put in effort, though, which is far beyond OP’s capabilities. She’s got academic studies linked to her and can’t even put on the effort to distinguish them from journalistic studies in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:33 PM
1

You do realize that people linking studies don’t determine if it’s paywalled, right? It’s the publishing company. Why the fuck would you link a paywalled study Because the study was relevant to the discussion? Jfc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:25 PM
1

It takes 2 seconds to find the rest of the source, and then benefit of that link is it zeroes in on the relevant section. The fact you’re struggling with technology doesn’t mean I’m being dishonest. And? I’d would say having casual sex is more promiscuous than not having casual sex, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:24 PM
0

actual journal articles about studies Both articles I linked are academic articles. I’m sorry you can’t tell the difference. complete with ALL the results and methodology sections Have you heard of sci hub? It’ll give you access to paywalled papers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:14 PM
1

Both sources I provided are academic articles. Go sci hub them like a normal person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:14 PM
1

“Sky high infidelity rates” You don’t have a credible source for this. So you didn’t even glance at my linked post with the sources in it? Got it. 👍 Also, people typically don’t offer commitment and invest in partners they have not throughly vetted. This is really not supported by current divorce rates. But in the early stages of a relationship, you can move on easily if you’re high value and you have options So it primarily matters in long term contexts? Yep, that lines up pretty much perfectly…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:08 PM
2

high standards for relationship-worthy partners, I think the problem with this theory is that seemingly the only way to square it with their sky high infidelity rates is that they have crazy high standard for relationship-worthy partners, yet they pursue relationships with “unworthy partners” anyway, then subsequently cheat. healthy views about sex, a strong sense of security and inherent self-value, and an abundance mindset I think your biggest issue here is you’re relying on the idea that it’s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 07:23 PM
3

Horoscope
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 04:33 PM
2

Promiscuity is just a symtom of something bigger. Yea, like having unrestricted sociosexuality and certain dopamine receptor variants, among other things. Promiscuity isn’t always a symptom of an underlying problem, sometimes it’s just who you are; it’s quite heritable. They can probably be an okay partner if they take it seriously, but I doubt they will ever be as good as a non-promiscuous partner. Similar to how a recovered drug addict can probably become an okay partner with enough effort, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 04:30 PM
2

You know there’s an in between area between “virgin” and “fucked 150 dudes,” right? Absolutely nothing I said suggests otherwise. You know that most men in the west don’t care about having a virgin, but near universally don’t want someone promiscuous, right? But notice that if men are preferentially selecting the non-promiscuous women for LTRs, it would presumably be because they are less “tainted” by multiple dicks per your explanation, no? Your argument suggests they shouldn’t care at all! fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 04:01 PM
4

Man bad
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:44 PM
6

Oh, yea. How unreasonable. I can’t believe men don’t want to wife up promiscuous women when promiscuous people are such bad bets for LTRs. Wanting a loyal partner is peak insecurity! And yes, I know this isn’t a conscious concern in all men. But the “ick” being reflexive doesn’t mean it doesn’t serve a purpose. Something something evolution, something something paternity certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:38 PM
7

You really gotta marvel at the lack of awareness, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:15 PM
5

Yea, I’d 100% agree she’s attractive. Only the photos where she’s doing everything to angle and look as big as possible can look a little uncanny to me, but that also isn’t how she’d look in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:58 PM
4

Define buff. Typical gym chick? Yes please. Female body builder? Yuck. As a rule, if she probably has higher test levels than me, it’s a no go.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:51 PM
1

As others have said, low weight. I’d say you need at least a couple of weeks to let things get back to normal. Really until it gets better, though. My go-to is to start incorporating blood flow restriction/occlusion training. A decent amount of evidence suggests it can be about as good as standard weight training for muscle growth, so I use it as a stand-in. I’ve found you can use it in place of standard weight training for as much as 2 months with zero loss in strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:49 AM
3

Those men have status! They got status by being attractive, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 10:28 PM
3

Most popular guys are not only average but below average? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 10:19 PM
2

Meanwhile all the top comments are roasting him
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 08:48 PM
1

Ah, but now we are just haggling over price.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 07:42 PM
6

All women are bisexual, you can’t cmv. 😤
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 07:39 PM
7

Less? From the article: “Eighty-nine percent of the couples had children, and all worked at least three days a week — men for roughly 42.8 hours and women for roughly 29.8 hours.” The average woman in the study doesn’t even qualify for full time employment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:12 AM
3

Men peak 7 years post mortem
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 09:49 PM
1

Right? 3 years post wall is bad enough!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 09:30 PM
3

I just love how we have actual studies on this as well, but it’s still a major point of contention. You can be mad that men care about a woman’s sexual past all you want, but the fact that they do really shouldn’t be controversial.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 03:30 PM
1

I think it’s reasonable for some men to accept a transactional relationship… knowingly. But I think we have to ask the question as to how often that happens vs how often the other person basically gets fooled into taking a deal they wouldn’t take otherwise. I really doubt most women are coming up to these guys they are settling for and telling them something like, “I still love my ex boyfriend in a way I’ll never love you. You really just aren’t that attractive, but you’re stable and I want kids…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 02:58 PM
1

Because most people lack willpower and fall back into old habits. I can simultaneously recognize that we need improved strategies for weight loss while also believing that most of the reason current strategies don’t work comes down to personal failures. Data suggests that if you lose weight and keep it off for a few years, you will typically stay lean. But most people can’t manage that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 02:25 PM
1

Goals/10
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 06:03 AM
2

I think this is half right. I think if your fat as a kid, probably up to some ways into high school, it’s your parents’ fault that you’re fat. But after getting old enough to the point where you can understand how to lose weight and still choose not to, it becomes your fault you stayed that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 05:49 AM
3

I’m gonna disagree because you’re missing a key component: enthusiasm. While I think loyalty and fidelity are necessary conditions, they aren’t sufficient in my view. If my wife feels pretty lukewarm about me (or god forbid actively pines for someone else), I’m not really sure all the fidelity in the world will make me feel like that’s a good deal. But hey, if you’re satisfied with a more transactional relationship, more power to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 05:46 AM
3

Eh, I think it’s more nuanced than that. While I don’t think being an asshole in and of itself is all that attractive, I think starting to be an asshole can still be a net positive for a lot of men. Tons of men struggle with coming across as too meek, timid, or low confidence. If you can be asshole to a woman, you might come across as a lot of things, but timid won’t be one of them. The problem is, for a lot of women, being timid is an absolute death sentence, while being an asshole is tolerable…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 05:28 AM
3

Yea, I’m actually not sure of a good way either, unless you know either the user or the exact phrasing. I figured you might have seen one recently. I realized you just meant “hot bod” as in fit, not necessarily hot overall. I’ve seen some funny posts on that topic. I remember a guy talking about struggling with women despite how great of shape he was in, and when I asked, he basically gave me the stats of a holocaust survivor. Sorry, bud, marathon runner bod isn’t exactly sexy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 04:45 AM
2

Can you link an example of someone claiming to be hot, financially successful, yet wildly unsuccessful with women? I’ve been here for years, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen that. Sounds wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 04:37 AM
2

Exactly this. I don’t blame people for having fears or being cautious, but (phobias aside) I’ll certainly judge you a little if you have a horrible, disproportionate fear over some really unlikely problem while remaining entirely unconcerned about issues which are far more likely to actually harm you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 04:19 AM
2

No. There’s nothing hypocritical about liking someone for a characteristic that you don’t have yourself, especially if you clearly bring enough else to the table that they are still interested in you. I feel like it’s really easy to see if you flip it around a bit. Let’s say a woman has the option to date two nearly identical guys, one of whom has abs and the other doesn’t. She doesn’t have abs herself. Is she a hypocrite if she chooses to date the one with abs?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 04:12 AM
2

Pretty much this, though I’d actually claim that it’s the men being desirable that often makes the women likable, not the inability to match with likable women as a category. But I totally agree. I’ve had periods in my life where I felt like I was more of an average, and periods where I was more of a so-called “high value” guy. Dating in the latter periods was fun, the former a bit less so.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 04:34 PM
1

Don’t forget steroids. Your average fitness model has a physique entirely unattainable naturally, yet that’s the bar normal men are ultimately compared to. Same is true for women, albeit to a lesser degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 04:17 PM
2

Well, at least we can agree that the advice to “just be confident” is bad advice. That would be encouraging toxic masculinity if then can’t back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 01:40 AM
1

They are going to pee themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 01:39 AM
1

It’s the only thing you seemed to think was worth mentioning in determining whether or not he had a higher mate value than her other options.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 01:01 AM
1

He’s not very attractive. At least physically. Physical appearance also isn’t not the only component of mate value. Is this black pill? 🦋 Exposure effect and proximity will result to attraction, thankfully. Exposure effect increasing how much people like each other isn’t necessarily the same thing as exposure effect changing their perceptions of mate value, which, again, is the operative issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 12:52 AM
1

I like pussy, does that count?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 12:13 AM
1

Okay? You didn’t mention anything about what her husband is like, in general nor relative to her previous partners. Maybe she actually did just land a great guy! Either way, I suspect you overestimate how introspective your typical person it. There are certainly some introspective people, but you need to be able to claim that it’s most or all people in order to claim there’s nothing to worry about. I don’t think there are all that many people contemplative enough to think “yea, my ex was great, …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 12:04 AM
1

I can’t help it that he’s double speaking. Just pick someone that is simultaneously similar and lower mate value, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:53 PM
1

But he’s not saying superior. He’s saying the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:46 PM
2

Your dilemma is that the operative favor isn’t whether you are a similar mate value. It’s whether they think you’re a similar mate value. If someone has routinely dated people significantly better than you, even if just for short periods of time, what do you think the odds are that they actually think you’re the best they can do anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:44 PM
1

Well if you declare it by fiat, it has to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:40 PM
3

I like how you post that pic as if it’s a “gotcha” and I still think she’s really attractive. Definitely better than any pic I’ve ever seen Zendaya in.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:38 PM
1

Okay? Even if that was true, that’s not beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:35 PM
1

I’m really not sure how you got that out of my comment. I think men should strive to have a relationship with women who are enthusiastically into them. I have a relationship with a woman who is enthusiastically into me. I don’t think actually having a relationship with a woman who is enthusiastically into me means it’s unreasonable for me to think that’s a good thing to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:28 PM
1

Me? Yea, of course. Shock of all shocks, I want a girl who is actually into me. Having one doesn’t really change that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 11:25 PM
3

/u/errrright
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 10:54 PM
2

Zero. My girlfriend gets all testy when I start approaching other women. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 09:38 PM
4

In a bygone age. I’m now dead inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 09:20 PM
5

“It says ‘live, laugh, love’ in Japanese. I’m so deep and special.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 09:13 PM
3

OP asked about examples of AF/BB couples, and you’re surprised I gave an example of an AF/BB couple? Would following it up with an irrelevant story about the tradcons I know in loving relationships make you feel better? To each their own. I’d rather live my own life than get stuck with someone who is pining for someone else and only cynically finds me useful. But most importantly, men should be able to make the decision themselves what situation they end up in rather than being basically tricked…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 08:16 PM
2

Don’t need to be drunk to know you’re a hottie tottie!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 08:03 PM
5

You got one right here. Doshkhaleesi is a verified milf. Make your move!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 07:47 PM
2

I’m not, but I’d by lying if I said I haven’t considered it many, many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 06:29 PM
6

What can I say? Reality conforms to red pill “fantasies” a disturbing amount of the time. I can assure you, this story is 100% real. I’ve told it on here multiple times, if the consistency counts for anything. But I’m sure it’s more palatable to just write off as internet stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 06:27 PM
3

Yep, pretty much. I couldn’t imagine being a guy In that position. Shit has to suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:53 PM
2

Yes, significantly. She was one of the hardcore chad chasers. For example, she had a 6’2” height limit. Her husband is a 5’10” normie looking guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:44 PM
2

Exactly! I’m glad you understand
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:23 PM
3

My condolences
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:20 PM
2

Buzzfeed is the only source of science.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:18 PM
2

Buzzfeed has a higher impact factor that Nature. Fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:15 PM
5

This but unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:05 PM
3

Damn, you got me. My v has c’ed. Woman bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:02 PM
2

I see your “woman bad” and raise you a “man bad.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:01 PM
4

Yes, quite a few. I’ll give you the quintessential example. They have a superficially happy relationship. He’s a good dad, takes good care of the kids. She likes how much he dotes one her, and thinks he’s a wonderful father and dutiful husband. They seem pretty amicable and get along well enough. Behind closed doors, she will admit that, while she thinks he’s a good dad and cares about him, she will never love him like her old FWB. But that guy was unstable, and her husband makes a lot more mone…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 03:56 PM
2

Lmfao In my experience, most girls/women’s soccer highlights seem more like accidents in comparison to men’s. Like how they’re haphazardly stabbing and staggering at the ball and one girl lays down and they always have to stop and stare down at the ball for 2 seconds before they kick it while somehow no defender presses them or tries to take the ball away during that time, they just sit and watch it happen. Then they cross it and it’s the first out of 50 haphazard crosses they’ve made all game y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 02:43 PM
3

But most of them only want abortions in the 1st trimester. This is why I hate the black and white dichotomy on such a complex issue. Lefties really won the PR battle on that front. I’m “pro choice,” but I’d argue I probably have more in common with a pro-lifer than a hardcore pro-choicer who wants abortion up until birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 02:34 PM
0

Yep 🤢
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:10 AM
2

You sure? I’ve seen the girls you post on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:08 AM
1

Don’t you like fat chicks?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:06 AM
3

Us Reddit vets gotta stick together. Keep these younguns in line. Also, quitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 03:42 AM
3

I’m in this deep, no quitting now!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 03:38 AM
3

Real men shitpost on their main account
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 03:34 AM
2

It wasn’t me, but I can downvote you again if you want
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 03:34 AM
1

Is this survivorship bias? Yes, or at least something like it. It’s easy to ignore all of the work that went on behind the scenes to make the magic happen. Or the marriages where people are desperately trying to keep up appearances but aren’t all that happy. If you only look at the small number of people who float through life and it “just works” for, then sure, it seems like you can do nothing and stuff just happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:39 PM
5

girls that work from the beach for 3 hours a day What are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:28 PM
1

Um, pickles can only come in jars. It’s a law of the universe. You’re just eating vinegar cucumbers 🤢
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:26 PM
2

Pickle jars are impenetrable to women, and a life without pickles isn’t a life worth living.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:22 PM
0

Yes you do
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:19 PM
1

A man of culture
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:18 PM
1

It’s a nice treat for when you go down on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:16 PM
1

that would be pears Based
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:14 PM
3

Fishing them out is half the fun
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:13 PM
1

“Yep, those ding definitely aren’t coming out.”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:13 PM
1

Oh, I was assuming we were dipping all of these fruits in vagina. Otherwise, what’s the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:07 PM
2

While I respect you for liking it raspberries, the second best fruit, this anti-orange propaganda cannot be tolerated. Pears are obviously the worst fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:01 PM
3

This is all science as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:00 PM
3

I’m unaware of who that is. (This is a joke)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:31 PM
1

Yeschadmeme.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:29 PM
5

Who is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:27 PM
4

I’m sorry, who?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:26 PM
10

Dicks other than mine defile women. This is science.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:26 PM
6

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:24 PM
2

WAP
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 09:55 PM
2

I’m not sure that would really explain it, though. Those are all people in their teens and early 20s, where men are still overwhelmingly not in relationships. Granted, pew’s granularity isn’t perfect, but it doesn’t seem like the issue really gets resolved until probably the mid-late 20s at the earliest.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 06:23 PM
2

That data isn’t marriages. It’s all relationships. I think they are generally catching women that are slightly younger as well, but usually only by a couple of years, on average. For the most part, those women would be in the same cohort with the guys who still can’t get dates while the women can.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:45 PM
5

Definitely. Also, those two categories aren’t mutually exclusive either. It’s not exactly rocket surgery to deduce “that guy serially cheats on women. I wouldn’t do that. I’m probably nicer than him.”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:39 PM
2

Most men (67%) want relationships in their 20s and 30s, but over half (51%) aren’t in one in their 20s. However, strangely, this isn’t true for women, and most women (68%) in their 20s are in relationships despite wanting them less than men (61%) in their 20s and 30s. Then, all of a sudden, most men (77%) end up in relationships in their 30s and 40s. These relationships had to come from somewhere, so presumably a large chunk (28%) of the men who were having a hard time getting in a relationship …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:33 PM
2

All of the men who weren’t in relationships in their 20s but ended up in them in their 30s per pew’s data?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:09 PM
1

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:04 PM
4

Inb4 “only ugly men use online dating”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:04 PM
7

And you would be wrong about that. Just to give one example, half of the top 20% most promiscuous people have cheated on a partner. Less than 5% of the least promiscuous people have. Promiscuity and infidelity correlate quite strongly, and are even mediated by some of the same genes. That point aside, I think your argument about allowing female preferences but not male preferences is pretty spot on. Full PDF of first link.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 03:36 PM
6

I think what kills me the most is that promiscuous people are bad bets for relationships, period. Men and women. The smart move would be for women to start worrying about “n-count” as well, at least if they don’t like getting cheated on or left. But alas, many of them would rather turn a blind eye entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 03:24 PM
2

You know I think you’re a cutie patootie. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 03:20 PM
–

It still works. You can get some peace and quiet in jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:46 AM
–

Have you considered not being ugly and fat, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:06 AM
1

I think those are just feminine looking men, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 08:07 PM
1

You’re making a lot of assumptions about me. Fault-based divorce would also benefit women who get cheated on and have abusive partners, but I guess we don’t want to have that conversation. No fault all the way!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 06:37 PM
1

Why should I have to go through the process of paying a lawyer for a second contract before the courts will consider something like infidelity in establishing child custody, for example? Seems unnecessarily complicated and expensive when it could just be built into the process itself. Should we start requiring additional contracts for anything to matter in court? Maybe we should also require prenups before we consider differences in income at all!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 06:05 PM
2

Right? I only care about the opinions of people with nice bones.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:31 PM
2

There are other strategies like checking the meta data iirc, but yea, there’s probably no totally fool proof way, which would hurt you. It’s not like screenshots are the only options, though. You could plenty of things you could probably do like pull phone records or hire a PI if you were really serious about proving infidelity. Besides, just because sufficient proof is difficult to get doesn’t mean people shouldn’t have the option of presenting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:30 PM
2

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:20 PM
2

I mean, digital forensics can usually detect photoshopped images, especially by amateurs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:19 PM
6

Exactly. I don’t have serious issue with places having no-fault divorce available. Imo what’s more questionable is when no-fault divorce is the only option.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:15 PM
3

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 05:11 PM
1

Yep, it sucks. Fucking adm*ns.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:36 PM
5

Based. I kind of feel like quiet masculinity is increasingly getting mistaken for weakness in our current culture. You really need to be somewhat bombastic and cocky to most reliably get especially women’s attention, and that will naturally lead to more and more men trying to adopt some kind of bravado in order to compete.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:35 PM
3

Oh, don’t worry, the comments are still based. We are all confused about… um… some guy he mentioned in his post, but I don’t know who he is. Fate? Hate? Late? I don’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:31 PM
2

We used to have basically a “no moderation” week where people could post basically whatever they wanted. There was all sorts of funny shitposting and trolling. Definitely peak PPD. Then the admins decided we were having too much fun and that it wasn’t allowed anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:24 PM
6

I think feminism helps your goals. For sure. I think women becoming even more entitled and insufferable really just takes marriage to that next level.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:17 PM
3

Who? Edit: I love bbcs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:14 PM
–

Agreed. I hate the phrase, lol. It just better encapsulates the idea than “bux.”
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:58 PM
–

Beta “bux” also isn’t just about money. The “bux” part is primarily a catchy name, if a little inaccurate. It’s important not to confuse it with gold digging. If a woman dates a guy that she doesn’t find (that) attractive because he seems like a safe bet, he’s provides a lot of emotional support (which she doesn’t normally prioritize), or he makes good money, all of those can be beta “bux” as TRP uses the term. Basically any relationship primarily driven by calculated, pragmatic concerns rather …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:52 PM
2

Magic, obviously. It’s a hypothetical
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 08:33 PM
2

I suspect it’s just “girl inches” and women being bad at estimating sizes. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 07:13 PM
2

I think I may be attracted to dumb men. Seems like you’re a properly functioning female, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 01:14 PM
5

Just wait until they do the thing where they follow you like a lost puppy between lifting areas. That’s basically the female version of a “move.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 01:12 PM
10

Aka virginity or lower N count. OP isn’t just talking about virgins here, though. She’s talking about less promiscuous women generally. While it doesn’t require being a virgin, less promiscuous people are typically a WAY better bet for long term relationship. As one example, half of the top 20% most promiscuous people have cheated on a long term partner whereas less then 5% of the least promiscuous 20% have. That seems like a relevant piece of information, religious or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:46 AM
1

provide for her I didn’t realize women were required to take a dick during job applications.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:57 AM
5

Caitlyn Jenner has entered the chat
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 11:41 PM
2

Oh man, you broke the code! also you’re beefcake scientist 50 year old obese woman, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 11:37 PM
2

0.16?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 11:34 PM
2

I’m a nice guy. I definitely don’t get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 11:32 PM
2

RIP
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 11:29 PM
2

I identify as a woman today. Do me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 11:25 PM
4

The latter. While abs are nice, I’d say having huge arms, broad shoulders, etc is worth a lot more than having abs but looking DYEL most of the time. That said, the overwhelming majority of people will have some semblance of abs at 12% bf, even if it’s just a 4 pack.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 04:41 PM
1

No. I’m not interested in dating men either.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 04:14 PM
1

Always have been 👩‍🚀 🔫 👨‍🚀
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 03:53 PM
5

You’re probably way higher quality in terms of being a good guy, but unfortunately being a little bit of a shithead is catnip for a lot of women. She very well might have been that kind of woman, and you might just come across as too much of a “good guy” to feel exciting for her. The good news is, at least if you’re aiming for something long term, you probably aren’t missing much if that kind of woman isn’t into you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 06:59 PM
3

Girls can be flaky. I wouldn’t really bank on having a date until she actually shows up to one. That sucks, though. Sorry that happened to you. It’s lame when people just blow you off like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 06:51 PM
2

Username checks out? She probably just wasn’t into you, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 06:48 PM
1

Probably less than you think. I’m not saying it will be an easy process, but unless you’re seriously deformed, there is quite a lot you can probably do to improve you appearance. Lifting, weight loss, fashion. There’s a lot you can do to improve your appearance that I’d bet you aren’t if you’re getting rated that poorly. You might not end up as some kind of gigachad, but you can almost certainly do better than a 1. It’s up to you whether or not that effort is worth the payoff, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 06:45 PM
3

I don’t think this really addresses the concern. Presumably the women on here saying as much are the hookup women, as they are indeed claiming to hook up. But these same women are also the ones saying they make the husband material guy wait. At least in those cases, it clearly isn’t a case of some women having sex fast and some slow, because it’s the same women. There is clearly at least a subset of women who will both have sex with some men fast, but slowly with others. And that concern motivat…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 06:39 PM
4

This would be true if women were actually sleeping with husband material fast. Which, sure, in a few cases they will. But if you spend even a little time here asking around, you will find legions of women who explicitly say they will purposely make the “husband material” guy wait. To the extent that’s true, it kinda of pulls the rug out from under your theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 06:32 PM
1

But wouldn’t she have had the make up on when she won? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 01:33 AM
8

Imagine basing your decision as to whether or not to mutilate your (or your child’s) dick on whether or not it will impress women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 01:26 AM
2

Military because career military is a lot, and not something I think I could ever make mesh with my lifestyle. Also they both cheat a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 11:35 PM
2

Anyone in the military would be an outright refusal. I’d be hesitant for any women in healthcare
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 11:22 PM
1

Haha, as much as I appreciate the egalitarian mindset, I’m just taking the piss. I don’t really see it as a big deal. If anything it’s flattering.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 11:28 PM
1

Lmao based
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:59 PM
1

“Hey bro, nice dick.”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:28 PM
3

F*males
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:27 PM
1

I’m gonna remember this next time some random woman comments on my muscles. Hands off, lady! I’m not a piece of meat!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:26 PM
1

Depends? Do you consider being sexualized a good thing. Because if not, it’s probably not a good thing. It’s definitely sexualizing you. That or it’s a euphemism for being fat. Pick your poison.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 10:25 PM
1

I kind of agree with this tbh. I do a low carb diet, and with few exceptions will eat basically anywhere. As you said, salads are almost always an option, and most stuff can just be modified like eating a lot of Asian food without rice or eating around the bits that are incompatible with your diet. I’ve got to imagine vegan stuff is similar. I guess the only additional objection many of the ethically motivated vegans could make is that doing something like eating around the non-vegan aspects of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 07:18 PM
3

Lmao, Jesus H Christ
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 09:39 PM
4

I’ve heard fiber helps with that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:46 PM
1

What I basically mean is that one can think “I really wish person X didn’t do Y” while also not thinking “I think we should force person X to do Y.” The obvious analog being women’s dating decisions for incels. The point being that expressing frustration at how women date doesn’t mean all incels necessarily want to force them to change. I don’t think this perspective reflects all incels by a long shot, and you’re right to point out that more problematic elements of the group need addressed. My i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 06:24 PM
1

I’m genuinely curious how you think you have a leg to stand on. Because this statement: Does every incel want to take female autonomy? Of course not. Is literally the only point in my original comment, yet you tried to use it as grounds to accuse me of wanting to “punish those who don’t choose me.” The rest of this is just posturing to try to hide that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 03:06 PM
1

Absolutely. Because not only are you trying to paint every single incel with the same brush, your comment actually insinuates that I am making such a claim myself, which is obviously false.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 01:48 PM
3

Solid humblebrag, I see you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 01:24 PM
2

The small brain take is to cook because you’re “supposed to” or women want you to. The big brain take is to cook because it’s an easy way to get a woman back to your place with a lot of plausible deniability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 06:41 AM
1

Weird take, but you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 06:38 AM
1

I don’t know, I feel like the top comment is a bit disingenuous. Wishing people made better/different decisions doesnt necessarily mean wanting to take away their autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:48 AM
2

I guess proud? I wouldn’t say I get much out of it, but I’m definitely not threatened. I don’t think some random dudes looking at her is really going to change much about our relationship. And if it does, there’s the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 11:57 AM
1

Sure. I never disagreed with you on the concepts of “how” and “how much.” I can totally respect the idea that women (really, people) wouldn’t want people continually harassing them, especially after they made the rejection clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 08:00 AM
3

I never said anything about that. The initial comment you replied to was specifically about validation… It’s less about physicality, and more about inconvenience. That’s kind of splitting hairs, but I see your point. To tie the ideas together, few people will have the guts to continue to follow me around if I make it clear I don’t want them to, in part because I’m much more physically imposing than a typical woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 07:59 AM
3

Broadly speaking, people generally agree on who is attractive and who isn’t. It’s pretty intersubjective. While gay men are less picky than women, if they find you attractive, you’re almost certainly more attractive to women than if they don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 07:52 AM
2

I’m not misunderstanding the point, simply using an exaggerated example. Nothing i have said so far suggests there is anything wrong with having preferences. You simply jumped to that conclusion because I pointed out a difference between men and women. I’ll say it again, with more feeling. You’re free to have whatever preferences you want. There’s no issue with that. I don’t think it’s a compliment if someone approaches me while being (clearly) drunk People don’t generally hit on ugly people, ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 07:21 AM
4

It’s probably worth clarifying, I only questioned the “who,” not the “how” and “how much.” There’s a big difference between a cordial pass and aggressive harassing you. I don’t see why a “hey you’re cute, oh, sorry, you’re straight? Have a nice day,” should be anything but validating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 06:58 AM
2

You’re absolutely free to have whatever preferences you want. If you think it’s best to never talk to another person again in you’re life, more power to you. I made the point about gay men because I assumed you were aiming at the idea that women don’t like men they aren’t interested in hitting on them. I suspect most men would have much less of an issue; I certainly do. Drunk or gay, I’m not sure it matters much. This point is somewhat striking in that not only do men actually like the validatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 06:55 AM
4

by whom Spoken like a woman. Gay men can feel free to hit on me all day long even though I’ll never be interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 06:43 AM
1

Nope. This place is clearly a gendered crazy competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 08:26 AM
1

Because women find losers, dummies, and dumbasses sexy? Best I’ve got.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 02:39 PM
2

What kind of psychopath made this? make bed every day Making your bed is for squares. I’m just gonna fuck it up on purpose the second I get into bed anyway. do laundry every day Um, you should at least wait for a full load. But even if that’s what they mean, why is there the urgency to do it every day? It’s easier to do multiple loads in a row anyway, and it’s not like I’m running out of clothes. squeegee shower walls daily Y tho. Somebody is a busybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 11:45 AM
5

They were probably oversimplifying. 80/20 in women is juxtaposed against men who find “the majority” of women attractive. But I guarantee you these dudes aren’t finding women in their late 60s hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 10:57 AM
7

When people say 80% of men are unattractive, they clearly mean within a given age cohort. Nobody expects 20 year old women to be fucking grandpa.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 10:51 AM
1

Oh, so you just want foolproof birth control, essentially? That makes so much more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 10:24 AM
1

I’d prefer if we couldn’t reproduce together to be honest Am I reading this right? You’re saying you wish men and women couldn’t reproduce together? This is a joke that isn’t translating well through text, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 10:10 AM
2

Female in-group bias (and male out-group bias) making women more likely to be accepted socially. Men comparatively have to earn their spot. That’s just one element, though. I’m sure plenty of other things like perhaps increased stigma of mental illness in men probably also play a role.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 11:57 AM
2

Tate Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 11:40 AM
2

You are aware that the mods have lives, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 09:00 AM
1

Is anyone arguing that professional women on their period don’t exist? OP’s point seems to be that it’s kind of funny how we will buy all sorts of hormonal explanations for women’s behavior. But for some reason we throw out all hormonal explanations for men’s. I’m assuming he’s talking about men having higher libidos than women because of all of the testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 08:54 AM
4

Lmao, yea, all men are going around causing PR violations and raping people. Non-rapist, professional men just don’t exist. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 08:49 AM
4

Everybody wants to talk about “believe all women” Everyone? Who are you listening to? That strong version of that statement is pretty controversial outside of social justice circles, and if you expected logical consistency out of that group then I don’t know what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 08:48 AM
-1

No, it has to be only be male insecurity. Otherwise we might imply something bad about female promiscuity, and we can’t have that!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 08:40 AM
3

Sure, never claimed otherwise. It’s also rational for a guy that understands how to become more attractive to women to check out anyway if he doesn’t think the payoff is worth the effort he would have to put in.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 08:50 PM
7

You understand the theory of red pill but don’t give enough of a fuck to put it into practice. Similar to how you can be blackpilled but still have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 08:34 PM
5

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 05:23 PM
4

Debating in a debate sub? How dare you!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:31 PM
2

Ew
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:25 AM
–

If only people were reliable reporters of what they are attracted to. Unfortunately…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 10:39 PM
–

Massive dong. What’s the point if I can’t use it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 09:27 PM
2

The replication crisis is kinda beyond subfields. It even bleeds over into a lot of biology as well. It’s pretty applicable to most fields with weak statistical confidence (e.g. p values of ~0.95 instead of 6 sigma) and complex systems which are easily confounded. Either way, I’m not really defending the argument. Just pointing out that he isn’t foolishly posting some article he didn’t even read; there was a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 11:02 PM
1

Cream soda is fantastic. But it’s okay, you’re allowed to be wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:45 PM
6

His argument is that you’re justifying the use of therapy by appealing to the psychological literature, but the psychological literature is facing a replication crisis which calls those results into question. You’re rebuttal isn’t as strong as you seem to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:44 PM
1

This is clearly false as long as cream soda and root beer exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:40 PM
1

No, because that might imply that you aren’t a bad person and women are simply superficial. And we can’t have that!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:35 PM
3

Damn it, you had one job
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 09:54 PM
3

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 09:06 PM
1

Probably not, considering men with “overweight” BMIs tend to do the best in dating. That isn’t to say that it’s not a factor, though. Your best bet is obviously moderately low bf% with a ton of muscle to boot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 06:14 PM
4

I still think one of my summaries of the fat positivity movement is this headline. Apparently women are “plus-sized” but men are “overweight.”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 06:08 PM
7

“Man bad woman good” is truly timeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 05:07 PM
–

You’re weird. Sushi is like my favorite food
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:03 AM
4

Similarly, I woudn’t say that men dislike “sluts.” Ideally, they seem to like them for fucking, but not for much else. Accurate. Tbf, this tendency is partially mediated by each man’s own sociosexuality (unrestricted men tend to be the ones that find sluts attractive for hookups, which shouldn’t be that shocking), but on the whole, it’s silly when people harp on women’s dual mating strategy without so much as mentioning men’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:21 PM
3

About 5 years
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:16 PM
1

It’s because Gen Z’s only exposure to the world is through TikTok.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 03:21 PM
2

Ah, so it’s cool if you’re attractive. Checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 03:03 PM
3

If it’s not the end of the world to get hit, it shouldn’t be the end of the world for them to get hit back.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 09:35 PM
1

Bold of you to assume prisoners don’t have options.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 06:30 PM
2

Swing. At least there is honesty involved and you have some input in the scenario. In reality, just stay single. I’m not about that life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 06:29 PM
3

We just call a spade a spade in noticing that there are loads of women like the OP who seem to be allergic to agency and accountability. Nawalt, but a lot sure are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 04:31 PM
–

Male. I always knew looks mattered some, but I certainly bought into the bullshit that “women aren’t as shallow as men, it’s more important that you’re yourself/a good guy” for a while. I’d say I was a probably around 15-16 when I realized girls were pretty much exclusively excited to date very attractive men. Many were so-called “chad only” and would stay single while chasing those guys while others did date more normie guys, but often seemed to show a distinct lack of enthusiasm vs when they d…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 05:30 PM
1

Tell them that they are retarded? Not much to rebut about a fairy tale.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 03:33 AM
2

Agggressive tickles? No. Like the soft tickles? So much.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 12:34 AM
2

I’m back on a mount and blade bannerlord kick. It’s a little janky, but I can’t help but love the hell out of that game series.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 08:48 PM
12

Depends on whether it’s her turn to fight off the baddies. We alternate to keep the relationship equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:35 PM
1

There are people that think that punching is okay unless someone else punches them, their reasons? Because they feel pain when they themselves get punched, but they don’t feel pain when they punch other people. Are we talking about real people here? It so, are we talking about specifically clinically diagnosed psychopaths?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 05:42 PM
1

I’d say if someone put a gun to my head I lean red, but I feel like I’m pretty split down the middle. I think the reality of how dating works is pretty red (with a solid dash of black), but I want the typical blue pill shit like a family and happy LTR. Classic “using red pill to achieve blue pill goals,” I guess, lol. be in their lives. I don’t think when people say “have a family” I don’t think they tend to mean “i want some people to have DNA similar to me and never see them,” haha. To be clea…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 11:09 PM
–

Because we value things other than just fucking? Stuff like intimacy, a family, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:11 PM
–

Well if you quickly check the Wikipedia article, women certainly also show a Coolidge effect, albeit to a much lesser degree. This suggests there is some preference for variety, but significantly less, which makes sense from an evolutionary perspective. Some mammals certainly go into heat, but that’s a behavior that varies significantly by species. We tend to be on the “doesn’t get a train run on them” end of the spectrum. You can see this, for example, in the fact that human males have much sma…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:09 PM
–

Inb4 “preselection doesn’t work on me at all.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:00 PM
–

Oh, yea, there’s nothing enticing to men about variety. No shot we evolved for it or anything. Look, I agree insofar as if a man is actually pushing to fuck other girls he probably doesn’t see you as enough of a priority to value your feelings. But I worry you’re being overly dismissive of the fact men do generally want variety (even if we choose to forgo it to have a stable relationship). It’s how we are wired.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:59 PM
2

I could see that. I imagine having one’s boundaries violated makes them extra mindful of doing it to others. I think most women are going to be more sympathetic towards men who were sexually assaulted or raped since the chances are they themselves have likely gone through something similar. I think this is a tempting line of thought, but I’m not sure it actually pans out in reality. For example, one might think women are more understanding of men with anorexia as they are more prone to it (and o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:52 PM
–

Congratulations on beating the odds
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:21 PM
–

Damn, bro. That suuuuucks. Hope you’re doing alright.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:58 PM
–

Okay? How does that conflict with anything I said? Whether or not it shows up on the first date is kind of beside the point either way. The baggage from being assaulted might not show up on the first date either. Doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:49 PM
–

Much if the time, no. Sometimes it’s just a medical/biological issue. See my example with Vitamin D in the follow-up comments. Similar concept for something like regular exercise or a good sleep schedule. It’s also worth considering that another major factor relates to depression is stress, but a lot of things we look at as constituting a “good” (dare I say chaddy?) life are also stress inducing. For example, a high performance job.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:46 PM
–

TIL being a virgin impact someone to the same extent as sexual assault. Serious answer, though, basically. You really think women are lining up to date dudes who are victims of sexual assault? Maybe I’m over-extrapolating, but my guess is women will be even less forgiving than men. We know for a fact they are when it comes to issues like mental illnesses.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:31 PM
–

Yea, I definitely think some people can be depressed because they have a shit life. I think what we think of as the clinical presentation of depression can be caused by having a shit situation rather than simply a chemical imbalance. That said, to beat my usual drum on the subject, vitamin D deficiencies are ridiculously common and can often cause depression. That was the cause of mine, and straightforward oral supplementation sorts me out with no problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:28 PM
–

Yea, but dude. Prostrate cancer has nothing on the super powers nofap gives you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:22 PM
–

Imbalance of neurochemicals, probably. Depression often has nothing to do with having a good life by any objective metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:14 PM
–

Your terms are acceptable as long as you ladies have to start eating (butt) pussy before we go down on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:30 PM
–

Anal week anal week anal week anal week anal week
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:25 PM
–

All the chads not brushing their teeth again? Ugh!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:21 PM
1

Yea, absolutely. I think the overwhelming majority of things people say on here about promiscuous women apply equally to promiscuous men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 01:15 PM
1

Is it? Why don’t we have people changing names in droves because their last names by both just “don’t work.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:28 AM
1

That seems like an incredibly specific scenario haha
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:21 AM
2

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:12 AM
1

I’m getting the same thing, lmao. They know…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:06 AM
1

As much as I’m not that traditional, I can’t help but feel like a woman not wanting to take your name either means she isn’t that into you or she’s a feminist. Neither of which are good.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:05 AM
7

More like attractiveness is a predictor of popularity
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:03 AM
2

Did you just assume my gender?!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 06:20 PM
2

Not with that attitude!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 04:41 PM
2

I’d start over and try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 04:39 PM
1

Apple’s autocorrect is functionally illiterate and likes to “fix” perfectly correct sentences. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 04:38 PM
4

Only Europeans like to say the word “American” like it’s an address. I’m assuming it’s mainly because of the lack of geographic knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 04:36 PM
3

Hot guys marry the hot girls. The issue people see alluding to is the hot guys fuck far more (and more average) women than they can or will marry, so that leaves a huge chunk of women who have fucked hot guys but have to marry a normie dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 04:34 PM
1

Lol, this comment is a month old in a daily thread. How did you find this one and not the half dozen other times I’ve made this point WITH the citation? Either way, here you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 01:43 PM
7

Most of us men do too, but that ruins the narrative
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 10:23 PM
3

Have you heard of our lord and savior Andrew Tate?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 08:13 PM
1

I read in a comment somewhere that this is allegedly a range, so the % is the number of women who allow that height in their filter. I can’t find a source either, though, so who ducking knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:27 PM
1

Only counts as a blowjob-equivalent
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:24 PM
1

That counts as two
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:18 PM
0

That’s okay, you’re allowed to be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 02:28 PM
2

I see your AMALT and raise you an AWALT. Lmao gottem
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 02:09 PM
2

Most stats peg the number of people who will openly admit to cheating on a survey around 20%. That alone isn’t a majority, but I wouldn’t really put odds worse than Russian roulette at “not that many” if I’m making a high stakes commitment. But further, trusting that number implies we trust a bunch of dishonest people not to lie. We know many people don’t tell the truth on surveys on sensitive topics, and what’s more sensitive that admitting to being a huge piece of shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 02:05 PM
3

Majority of men and women won’t admit to cheating.*
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 02:01 PM
4

Ah, yes. The only two options. Whirlwind romance with chad or a LTR with a basement dweller.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 01:59 PM
2

Only if they are longer than 6.5 inches
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 01:57 PM
5

So you gonna break out that tape measure 10 years in, and if he’s of by a centimeter, off to the cleaners?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:11 PM
4

Confirmation that women will divorce men over just an inch?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:06 PM
5

Now you just need to make a post about how women are obligated to do nice things for their man so they can tell you that they don’t do shit and that men can cook for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 10:51 PM
3

Ah, I think I’m with you. When you said “don’t forget it’s about love,” I took it as “don’t forget the hoe phase is about love.”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 03:38 PM
2

Let’s say it’s about love. What’s the point of finding someone you love only to intentionally ditch them latter on? Unless of course the goal is to not ditch them, in which case that’s just looking for an LTR in disguise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 03:26 PM
1

I asked you how sure you were that you didn’t know anyone like that? Are you looking at how she treats her husband and/or the behind the scenes talk? Or just believing the carefully manufactured Instagram posts? But boy, you really roasted me by ignoring that first paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 02:22 PM
2

You sure about that? You see no signs she settling for a safe bet that she either doesn’t care about or perhaps is kind of okay with, but mostly tolerates for the stability? I’ll give you my favorite quote on the subject from a woman I know: “I care for my husband. He’s a great husband and father and takes care of me and the kids. But I’ll never love him like I love [ex-FWB].”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 02:19 PM
2

As others are saying, mine are too. I don’t think this surprises anyone. Now are they married to the kind of man that they are attracted to? That’s a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 02:10 PM
1

For starters, it isn’t clear from the post to what extent OP had stuff like shared rent with her. But even if we assume he did, i didn’t realize you had to promise someone sexual exclusivity to share rent with them. I bet some of my previous roommates feel really disappointed. I could have sworn they weren’t gay! I find it quite ironic you try to make claims about lacking moral development to try to justify using duplicitous behavior as an easy fix. Post-conventional moral reasoning is about eth…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 01:43 PM
0

Men who can be promiscuous are typically high tier men due to women’s pickiness, so there is a lot to recommend dating him even if you don’t like that he’s promiscuous. To top it off, most women don’t care that much; it might be on their list, but usually not that high. It can even be a positive if you consider preselection. Women who are promiscuous can be average as fuck due to men’s horniness, so there’s really nothing to particularly recommend dating them. Meanwhile, most men REALLY care if …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 05:14 AM
2

Washcloth/finger in the shower. I’ll typically throw it in and flush it next time I go (not that I use random tissues much anyway). And whether it’s bullshit or not, I’m don’t see a point in getting a dedicated trash can to throw away a toilet paper roll every few weeks. I do have a trash can, though. It’s specifically to appease the ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 04:48 AM
4

I don’t use q-tip, flush tissues, and don’t really feel like a dedicated trash can for only toilet paper rolls is really necessary. It goes in recycling anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 04:40 AM
1

You only need to squat 225 to be a man? Damn, standards are really slipping.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 04:37 AM
4

Because basically only women use bathroom trashcans. I basically never use the trash can I do have. If you live alone and don’t have women come over much, why would it strike you to get one?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 03:58 AM
0

He allegedly cheated on her because he DIDN’T want to stop giving her all of his money…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 03:51 AM
2

Yea, basically. Definitely never claimed to be an optimist. That said, there are definitely quite a few more misandrists here than normal. Just ignore them, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 01:00 AM
0

I would never suggest that her behavior wasn’t also selfish. And I totally get it, you were in a shitty situation. I absolutely sympathize with that. I just also don’t think two wrongs make a right.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:58 AM
–

Yea, I’m implying the ladies here are actually better than average rather than worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:54 AM
0

Nothing was stopping you from giving her money or assistance in her nursing program. You don’t have to be her boyfriend or fool her into thinking you’re exclusive to do that at all. But instead of being up front about the fact you still cared about her enough to help her finish school but that the relationship couldn’t work due to a lack of intimacy, you just lied about it. Life is complicated, but there are always honest solutions to problems. Cheating is the easy, selfish solution. By the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:52 AM
–

Then why stay with your ex? I’m not saying to stay with a partner who treats you badly. I’m saying don’t be duplicitous about it. Not cheating is super easy and cheaters are just selfish. Just break up, easy fix.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:29 AM
–

Absolutely. Cheaters are scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:14 AM
–

Never. Once a cheater, always a cheater
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:09 AM
–

Sundresses, sundresses, sundresses
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:04 AM
–

What would be an example of something you got “the ick” from as a teen? I ask because the distinction I’d draw is that “the ick” isn’t so much about a girl turning you down for something superficial, especially initially (though we could frame this as simply having no tokens to begin with). Rather, it’s about having someone you were already significantly attracted to, typically for a while, and (seemingly) instantly finding them repulsive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 12:01 AM
–

Tbh, I don’t really agree with the idea that women will get “the ick” over one little thing. They get it, don’t get me wrong, but it’s not that simple. One of my favorite PPD concepts comes from an old user that proposed the idea of masculinity tokens. Basically, when you do masculine shit, you earn tokens you can “spend” on doing less masculine stuff without your girl seeing you as a pussy. Often, some of these things are really positive for relationships (eg doing something sweet for your girl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 11:41 PM
–

Wat
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 11:22 PM
–

Kick that little shit’s ass. These are equal opportunity hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 11:21 PM
–

Of course not. Feminists would neeeever be dumb enough to fall for a 4chan troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:37 PM
–

Speak for yourself. I love admiring the man haters in their natural habitat.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:32 PM
1

Kinda like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:31 PM
–

Men start wars. Do they, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:28 PM
–

Preppy? Are we talking about the same new balance? Have the zoomers gone full circle and the boomer dad outfit is now cool and “retro?”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:22 PM
–

Really going for that 90s boomer dad vibe?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:10 PM
–

What can I say? I’m a classy guy They are damn comfortable, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 10:02 PM
–

Rockport loafers in black or brown, depending on my outfit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:59 PM
–

But what about when they talk to you and temporarily become visible? 🤮
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:57 PM
–

Yes, it’s about meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:21 PM
–

I usually distinguish them by the fact that one is meaningful and the other is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:10 PM
2

Oh, so you’re starting a new copypasta? Truly the trendsetter we need.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:43 PM
–

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copypasta
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:42 PM
–

Is this a new copypasta that I haven’t seen?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:41 PM
–

Exactly! Ain’t nobody going to damage my property!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:00 PM
–

Why not hold out for those 60 year olds? They are extra developed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:55 PM
–

Not on average, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:47 PM
–

Metal, hardcore, punk, and EDM primarily. I’d say pretty similar. I’m more into metalcore than super hard metal these days and listen to more EDM, but the broad strokes are about the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:46 PM
–

Yea, they are way more introspective than normal here
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:43 PM
–

Not just a sex object. Like an actual inanimate object.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:29 PM
20

Women: men need to talk about their mental health problems more Also women: ew, he talked about his anxiety
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:31 PM
1

Who are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:25 PM
2

I’m always first, even when I’m not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:24 PM
4

Why would you avoid abusing her? BPD chicks love that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:08 PM
3

First
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:02 PM
–

Is this black pill? 🦋
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:00 PM
–

But how do you know that they are having real mental states? They could be philosophical zombies that are just programmed to say that they aren’t sex objects. In fact, obsessively watching the bachelor is exactly what I’d expect a philosophical zombie to do!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:58 PM
–

Prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:47 PM
–

Lmao, I promise you that you’re big enough for anyone but the most extreme size queens. You’re bigger than me, and I’ve received plenty of positive comments, never negative ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:46 PM
–

Wait, what? I didn’t realize objects could have feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:40 PM
2

A woman can’t refer to herself as a “guy?!” This is 2022!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:07 PM
–

Did you just assume my gender?!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:06 PM
–

Me
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:05 PM
1

What can I say? I’m a degenerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 03:12 PM
3

She loses points for being bl*nde.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:59 PM
–

That’s a pretty specific remark, lol. What about my absolute ranking?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:57 PM
1

I quickly checked some numbers before posting, and it looks like estimates are usually between 20-25%. I wouldn’t call that “most.” Struggle with dating relative to what? Your objection is kind of like saying “I know smart men who struggle with their career because they only make 6 figures and aren’t billionaires.” Yea, I’m sure Ben Affleck “struggled” dating as a normal hot guy vs being giga famous and women literally throwing their panties at you. It’s all relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:56 PM
–

5-4.5-6-6.5 if we are just talking base attaction. Bump that up a point or two if we are factoring in that a huge chunk of people are fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:51 PM
–

Most people also don’t have mental issues, but here we are. But like I said, it also depends on the issue. Anxiety is technically a mental disorder, and that isn’t going to really impede a chad-lite vs a short, fat dude. We don’t have to be talking about models. People in day to day life obviously have big enough differences in attractiveness to make a big difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:46 PM
–

Depends on the severity of each. A super hot dude with minor social anxiety is going to do way better than a super ugly dude. But a normie dude with schizophrenia and severe autism will undoubtedly do worse than a somewhat below average man. Also, awkwardness and mental issues are kind of in totally separate leagues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:36 PM
1

That was one of the first thing that came to my mind, yea. But even just IRL it tends to be conservative people who want to argue about an issue vs liberals morally shame you. What would be interesting is to see if that still holds in a crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:28 PM
–

This is some pretty weak bait. You can do better, I believe in you!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:31 AM
1

Strengths: tall, muscular Weaknesses: introverted, kinda nerdy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:00 AM
0

Yea, I bet is the conservatives would immediately try to debate lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:47 AM
2

I’d love to see how that plays out at a conservative/pro-choice rally. Could be an interesting experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 02:26 AM
7

Daily reminder that people post threads about dating being harder for men because the entire purpose of this sub is debates surrounding dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 02:04 AM
2

Only from you, bb
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:56 AM
2

This isn’t /r/debatereligion ! But no, I don’t. It would be great if there was a benevolent god and a nice afterlife, etc. I just don’t particularly find any of the evidence for it compelling enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 10:26 PM
12

Because most people want commitment eventually. There might be a few outliers, but most people seem to want to settle into a stable LTR at some point. Indeed, most do at some point in life; historically almost everyone has gotten married at some point, and to my understanding the drop in marriage rates is more or less matched by a shift toward non-marital but long term cohabitation. The older women not dating (again, to my understanding) are typically older women who have already had an LTR with…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 09:04 PM
3

Yes. But I’ve always been more of an LTR-oriented guy. I’ve tried casual sex, it’s fine, I guess. Mostly just shallow pleasure seeking. If I’m honest, it was mostly an unhealthy reaction to being cheated on. In general, I find meaningful relationships much more fulfilling, and I think everyone would be much better off if more people realized that instead of just chasing raw hedonism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 07:18 PM
1

Yes. It’s delicious. Especially sours. Like a good blackberry sour is fantastic. But I should clarify, I mean good beer. Shit like bud light or corona is nasty.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:56 PM
2

Hahaha yessss. Based mod.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:27 PM
2

Booo!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:17 PM
1

Sure, it’s men’s dual mating strategy. Sluts are attractive for STRs but unattractive for LTRs. But I feel the need to point out that this doesn’t really support your point at all. In what sense is saying “I won’t commit to sluts” complaining that women aren’t having casual sex with them? If anything, it’s the opposite; women are seen as low (relationship) value because they have sex with these guys. I see the same thing you mention here, I just don’t think it supports your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 04:20 PM
18

At the end of the day, I see this as mostly a sort of market problem. The reason promiscuous women are vilified is because men nearly universally hate committing to promiscuous women, while for a huge chunk of women, a man’s chastity is quite low on their list of preferences. Men would care a lot more about being seen as promiscuous if women on the whole cared about it as much as men do. That’s the whole reason behind why slut shaming works on women but (generally) not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 04:17 PM
1

The number of people who are upset that women aren’t having casual sex full stop is quite small from what I’ve seen. The number of people who are upset that women have casual sex with some guys and then make others wait patiently on the other hand…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 04:12 PM
3

Absolutely. Philosophy is one of the highest IQ majors, up close to physics and astronomy iirc. That doesn’t change the fact that your average STEM major still also beats out the overwhelming majority of other majors, particularly the “harder” ones like math, physics, chemistry, and engineering.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 10:16 PM
1

I commented before OP added those in. I agree, I don’t see anything off in those two. I did google her to see what he was talking about, though, and she did have quite a few pics where she looked like a totally different person.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:57 PM
1

Well sure. We certainly type-cast both “stem” and “nerdy” guys as inherently socially awkward, even if that isn’t necessarily true.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:54 PM
1

Agree to disagree, I guess. I typically see people talking about how the guy is “lucky to have her,” especially if he was less successful when he was younger and most girls were primarily chasing hot guys instead of prioritizing stuff like the guy’s career potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:50 PM
1

Probably the filters hitting that uncanny valley
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:46 PM
1

I think that thing to notice is the “dating up” bit, though. Like very few people are going to say your average Becky is “dating down” if she lands sperglord Elon Musk because he just has THAT much status. So the fact we see it that way for the run of the mill STEM guy is pretty telling as to which person we consider more valuable. You’re right he’s clearly compensating for his deficits by being successful to an extent, but the fact we still see him as the lesser party is what is telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:39 PM
5

On the other hand, if you can’t accept the fact that your typical person in STEM is smarter than the typical person in most other majors, you’re revealing something about yourself as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:27 PM
3

Not dating lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:25 PM
2

Big brain strat right there. Find a girl who is interested in you for you instead of just your height. Same principle as hiding your wealth from girls if you’re loaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:23 PM
4

Pretty accurate. As much as we like to talk about status and achievement, being pretty > high achieving on the dating market, at least until you become astronomically high achieving (eg multimillionaire or famous). As a result, we generally see smart, successful STEM guys as “dating up” if they have a pretty girl because subconsciously everyone agrees that her being attractive is more important than him being smart or successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 09:20 PM
2

Yep, totally agree with your synopsis. Frankly, I’m kind of impressed anyone is vilifying the idea that spending time with your partner should be a relief and not “work.” If the only way that you can imagine supporting your partner is by serving as a de facto therapist, I feel like that warrants some serious introspection.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:00 PM
2

If you actually want a blood test, just get his LH and FSH levels tested. If they are like 0 but he has decent test levels, he’s juicing. But also keep in mind that a lot of the super bad side effects from roids come from pumping your numbers to excessive levels. If he’s just on TRT, while it will likely elevate his risk for stuff like prostrate problems, there can actually be a number of potentially beneficial effects as well. The biggest issue would be lying about it if he is indeed using. I d…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 06:05 PM
12

Could be because when you live in a society that labels men as defective for struggling with women, getting a modicum of sympathy that it’s actually hard out here feels kind of nice. It’s like a recognition that there is a systemic problem, similar to how some poor people appreciate it when we recognize that there are systemic problems causing them to struggle rather than simply the fact they aren’t pulling their own bootstraps hard enough. There is clearly a prevailing notion that if you strugg…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:57 PM
2

Which is exactly why people should avoid so-called “alpha widows” (or widowers). While you can face resentment for playing video games while your partner cooks, a nearly foolproof way to build resentment is to have a partner who feels like they are settling for less than they “deserve.” It’s pretty clear that mate-value disparities slowly erode relationships. You really have to be better than you partner or better than their other perceived options. If you can’t do either, you’re already on borr…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:21 PM
6

This but unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:15 AM
2

Yes, quite a number of times. Apparently I have a pretty nice butt.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 10:44 PM
1

How can you post on a sub that frequently but not sub to it? It’s just… wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 02:48 PM
2

Fuck lurkers. All my homies hate lurkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 01:46 PM
2

I recognize your name and you aren’t even subbed? Peak degeneracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 01:44 PM
2

Have you even tried getting big and muscular? That plus getting lean can seriously change your face. You might need a lot less than you think. You can also get a decent physique with 2-3 hours a week. You won’t be an ifbb pro or anything, but you will look a lot better than. Itching at all. If you can’t fit that into your schedule, you have bigger problems than a lack of muscle.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:37 AM
3

Not sure tbh. Best I could do is speculate aggressively. Could definitely be menopause killing sex drive. Could be feeling like dealing with most men is a chore. Could be giving up on finding a man that meets their ideal standards. I don’t know of any evidence one way or the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:04 AM
3

Maybe with that attitude!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:50 AM
2

Having a fragile ego is the most alpha thing in existence, didn’t you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:46 AM
2

If you can take a dick, you can take a snickers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:42 AM
0

I’m not really sure we have any reason to believe that’s the actual causal explanation, but it does seem to be true that older women desire a relationship significantly less than older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:40 AM
1

Mostly because your still not getting the whole “in every other case of bodily autonomy, it is not a crime” thing. It’s not that I don’t get it, it’s that it isn’t relevant. It assumes there is no relevant differences as compared other issues of bodily autonomy, which clearly isn’t the case. Sure, we don’t allow someone’s bodily autonomy to be violated in a vacuum, but people also aren’t typically invading someone else’s (the baby’s) bodily autonomy in he process. Further, you aren’t directly re…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:31 AM
1

Why would we do that? A miscarriage from being attacked isn’t her fault. We don’t expect people to be impregnable defense forces. Imagine we are talking about a toddler. If someone breaks into my house, overpowers me, and shoots my child, nobody is going to say I’m neglecting my parents duties. However, it’s quite a different story if I’m the one that shot my own child. I certainly has an obligation not to do that, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 10:47 PM
1

That mother’s obligation doesn’t exist though. Otherwise we’d have to criminalize miscarriages as negligent. Well, only in cases where there actually is negligence, sure. So a spontaneous miscarriage would be fine because no one is actually blameworthy, but if a woman intentionally caused herself to miscarry then we would. Thing is, we kind of already do that. If I go punch a pregnant woman in the gut and force her to miscarry, I’ll get prosecuted for murder. Only difference is we would start ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 09:52 PM
2

I’m not sure I follow. The problem isn’t necessarily the sex or pregnancy itself, as actually carrying the fetus to term (and obviously supporting it in other ways after birth) eliminates the issue. The parents forced the fetus/child to be dependent on them for a time, and they delivered on their obligations. So while unprotected sex increases the odds that of ends up in the situation, but as long as the parents actually care for the child, what’s the crime?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 09:07 PM
1

it would make zero difference in his attractiveness to women. 1 > 0
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 08:55 PM
2

All in all, a vehicular manslaughter. Setting aside the fact that DUI deaths can often also be charged with murder, it seems we would agree that the action is a punishable crime. Therefore, would it not be reasonable to conclude that if a woman takes the risk of getting pregnant, thereby forcing the fetus to use her circulatory system, she is similarly blameworthy if a person (the fetus) dies as a result of her behavior? you seem to think a punishment is in order for the crime of gasp having con…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 08:52 PM
1

That’s a good point. OP probably should have pressed harder to make people clarify under which conditions this would be acceptable and if it would remain acceptable in situations where the fetus is a person. Though I suspect for several in that thread, their view is that abortion is still acceptable even if the fetus is a person. You can see several comments in that thread trying to justify abortions because “removing the embryo is still a procedure” despite the fact OP was very clear it’s the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 08:29 PM
1

I can assure you, I have zero issues understanding the argument. To be frank, I’m a little baffled at how you can jump from my statement “most people have beliefs inconsistent with their bodily autonomy stance” to “oh, obviously you just don’t understand the argument.” That seems like quite a stretch. But sure, we can hash this out. Precisely, I’d contend that your statement: Even if it would kill you as you are right now, much less a fetus. Is obviously false, specifically when the fact that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 08:25 PM
6

A loving relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 07:57 PM
1

But I’m not representing an argument at all. To be clear, I’m not saying “personhood arguments invalidate bodily autonomy arguments.” Rather, my statement is one of of personal experience. I’m saying, “I’ve asked dozens of people to justify abortion following consensual sex using bodily autonomy and basically none can do so coherently. They always ultimately appeal to personhood arguments when they can’t defend their bodily autonomy position even though personhood is irrelevant to that discussio…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 07:53 PM
2

Right? Just do it high key. Ladies, feet pics to my inbox, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 07:34 PM
-1

Holy shit, that thread is amazing. I agree with you. I’ve long held the belief that almost nobody actually accepts abortion due to bodily autonomy. Usually when you press people on it, you get a bunch of indefensible gibberish and they eventually fall back on “but a fetus isn’t a person,” which is NOT an argument from bodily autonomy. Bodily autonomy arguments should work even if a fetus is a “person.” I’ve always assumed this was because the mainstream (feminist) narrative requires the issue to…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 07:04 PM
3

I’d try to make time for it. Especially if you’re new to lifting, even 1 day a week will give you slower but incremental progress. You don’t need a full autism 6 days a week lifting schedule, especially at first. You would probably get more clear hints, but I’d be careful in underestimating your ability to be oblivious, especially if you’re young. You might be getting hints that’s you’re just whirring on. If you aren’t sure, just go for it. Better to shoot your shot and miss than get yourself st…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 06:49 PM
3

cute Ouch, sorry bro. I’m just skinny and being honest, looking in the mirror I really don’t know what I could provide to a girl sexually Then get to the gym! This problem is 100% within your own control. I promise you it will help with your confidence too. I really don’t know how to make my interest in a girl known without seeming like a creep. Are you confident with your boys, or also with random strangers? One of the biggest things that can make you come across as a creep is nervousness. If y…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 06:26 PM
1

you’ve done a poor job Lmao, my bad. I guess I didn’t appreciate how easy it is to confuse “that’s the opposite of what I said” with “that’s exactly what I said.”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 06:01 PM
4

If toxic femininity exists, What do you mean if? Is there really any doubt that some aspects of femininity can be toxic?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:34 PM
1

Are you even reading my comments? I’m agreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:05 PM
1

I’m a little baffled you got the idea that I think n-count serves as social proof to women. I literally said the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:59 PM
1

Both. The one I can recall from memory was something like women rate men ~1 point more attractive if they think he’s in a relationship. There are others measuring it different ways as well. I can try to find it again if you’re legitimately interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:42 PM
3

Because old women actually are checking out of dating, and if you aren’t clever enough to segment those statistics by age, you can fool yourself into thinking it’s actually young women that are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:33 PM
2

It’s not going to make a dude a gigachad by itself, but it’s definitely going to do something. Mate choice copying is quite well established. People can tell the difference between lustful stares and “ew” stares. If poindexter was actually getting lustful stares from other women (or they think he’s taken), all evidence suggests women will rate him as a bit more attractive. But more to the point, you never answered my initial question. Where did someone actually claim n-count specifically makes a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:30 PM
2

No it isn’t. You can get social proof without actually fucking the girls. Guys just typically do, hence why higher N men tend to be more attractive. But as Poppy is saying, it isn’t because they are high-n. It’s because they have social proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:27 PM
2

Do you actually have a link to someone claiming women like men BECAUSE of their high n? And high N specifically, not just interest from other women, which is definitely attractive. The claim I always see is always that women go for high-n dudes because men typically have to be fairly exceptional to get a high lay count, so women are willing to make the compromise. It’s not that they want it, they just don’t care compared to other features.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:15 PM
3

Lmao, didn’t take you long to jump to reading my comment history. I think that’s a new record!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:57 PM
6

Funny, me too. See you tonight, honey.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:54 PM
6

Wow, what transphobic language! You should really phrase it “trans women are hard lol.”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:50 PM
4

So you claim, and yet you’re worried here that you couldn’t detect it in your own boyfriend. What if I’m your boyfriend? How will you ever know? We all love our moms, after all!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:49 PM
6

🪑
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:47 PM
6

So proud, you have no idea. I love to get the revenge fantasy ragers’ panties in a twist.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:46 PM
2

No. It can be hard to get over having feelings for someone if they are dangled in your face every day. That said, you don’t necessarily need to totally terminate the friendship. Just take some time apart for a while. Often that will end the relationship anyway, but at least you didn’t go all scorched earth about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:33 PM
3

I mean, I generally agree with her that girls aren’t flaky if a guy is her best option. It’s just that often you won’t be unless you’re dating down a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:31 PM
1

take the bigger girl out and see what happens. Ew
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:29 PM
6

I love my mom, have a loving girlfriend, and am an obnoxious TRPer right now. Embrace the fear!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:25 PM
–

Alone. I’m not in the market of financing someone who only likes me for what I can do for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:12 PM
–

And by meme she means fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:03 AM
–

Imagine being such a normie that you’re in the main discord and not none of the secret ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 12:19 AM
1

I have zero doubt social proof does something. But the question is whether or not social proof is enough to provide a boost to a decent looking high tier normie, or if guys can get away with social proof as their primary quality. OP is clearly high enough value he’s already got chicks trying to hug him. Notice the exact catch 22 I mentioned here. It’s working because he already has chicks expressing interest in him. The question is how you bootstrap yourself to social proof unless you’re already…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 05:22 PM
3

What level of social proof do you think it would take to make your typical engineer have women chasing him? Also, what kind of social proof? We talking like just having some friends? Or is it the catch 22 that he already needs chicks chasing him to appeal to preselection?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 03:31 PM
5

Ah, the “just be famous” pill. Why didn’t I think of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 03:28 PM
–

Well there was that one infamous chadfishing experiment, so maybe, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 03:14 PM
2

English muffin
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 04:25 PM
2

Eggs Benedict with smoked salmon and herb goat cheese spread
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 04:21 PM
3

Keep it safely locked away so it doesn’t get damaged? Yea.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:13 PM
2

Eat more. At least in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:11 PM
1

I think you mean confidence (but only if you aren’t short).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:07 PM
5

Male suffering
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:40 PM
1

Awful? Yes. Kinda funny? Also yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:33 PM
1

Property
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:01 PM
1

California doesn’t either. Bunch of degenerates.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:00 PM
4

OP got sooooo offended. That’s amazing… and telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 05:06 AM
2

Makes sense. You aren’t allowed to be that based here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 04:58 AM
2

But some routines are measurably better than others. It’s just a matter of physiology and biochemistry, not magic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 04:22 AM
1

At most gyms, it’s really not that hard to use a fixed set of equipment for a routine and just jumble up the order. You can also use different lifts for the same muscle groups. Equipment availability isn’t even a consideration for me as it’s basically never a problem, and I go to a pretty high traffic gym. If you consider getting at a minimum 20% faster improvement and likely higher peak potential to be a waste of time the I guess that’s your prerogative. I figure if I’m going to spend thousands…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 04:10 AM
1

I’d run them on your shoulders/bis/tris day, personally. While it works some lower chest, triceps are by far the primary muscle group. I’d say it’s better to run a major compound lift when you’re as fresh as possible so it fits well on that day. In case it isn’t clear, I mean weighted dips with enough weight that you meet your standard rep ranges for other compounds like bench. And that’s awesome. I’ll look forward to the feedback. Hope it works well for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:20 AM
1

It could be okay depending on your training volume and goals. One potential thing to consider is you’re basically hitting bis and tris twice because they are working as accessories in your chest/back day as well. Obviously the downside is those lifts mostly won’t be compounds (please do dips if you do this split), and you de-emphasize your chest/back so your major lifts probably won’t improve as fast as they could. Evidence suggests that equal volume spread over multiple days vs one hard day is …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:02 AM
1

You gotta give us a timestamp and a post
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 11:29 PM
1

🧢
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:27 PM
1

RIP all relationships. Women having expectations of male performance is a fact of life. You either play the game or don’t. There’s no cheating the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 08:40 PM
5

Just like all those damn poors being toxic about their lack of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 08:37 PM
2

Welcome to the burden of performance
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 08:36 PM
17

I think there are two extra layers to this that you’re leaving out. The first is the fact that often when men talk about what women want (here at least), they mean “what turns women on.” Hardly anyone gives a fuck about discussing what makes women “happy” in a cerebral sense, because that’s the easy part for most guys. The problem is, women seem to prefer very disagreeable men for hookups. This should tell us that women do, in fact, get turned on by men who come across as a bit of an asshole. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 08:19 PM
2

Glad we can both agree that everyone’s opinions are invalid until they turn 70.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 04:09 PM
3

If you’re under 70, your opinion on these issues is way too unriped to be conclusive. 40 year olds have literally half the experience. Imagine trying to draw conclusions from so little!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:29 PM
3

I generally agree with that take on STRs as a practice. I much prefer LTRs. However, I think STRs give us a lens into what women actually found arousing because unlike LTRs, they are pretty much only selecting for sexual chemistry.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:18 PM
3

For LTRs, absolutely. STRs? I dunno.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:09 PM
5

Women and reframing all problems to be a result of the male ego. Name a more iconic duo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:06 PM
1

They don’t? I assumed they could tell when they got turned on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:05 PM
2

Nice. I got told I look like a pushover, and I’m on cloud nine.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:02 PM
1

Is that marriage or first marriage, though? Important distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 02:18 PM
6

There are so many other factors that go into being sexually attracted to someone… and being nice isn’t one of them. FTFY You act like the idea that women aren’t attracted to guys for being nice is this obvious piece of information, but when people are going around saying “girls aren’t as superficial as boys, they want a nice guy with a good personality” or “the reason you’re struggling with women is your bad personality,” I’m really not sure why we are supposed to consider that an obvious conclu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 01:53 PM
–

You da man
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 04:19 AM
–

You can’t just say that shit and not post the recipe!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 04:15 AM
–

TIL I’m a sadist
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:14 AM
1

Tom segura is by far one of my favorites. That dude is a riot.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 12:33 AM
6

Bold of you to assume they have enough taste to get Chipotle. It’s usually some shit brunch spot that charges 25 bucks for 3 poorly scrambled eggs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 06:45 PM
1

Nice, that’s always the best part
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 02:57 PM
2

Yes. At least with some frequency. Something to consider is that a lot of “relationships” that “aren’t that serious” are just de facto FWB pretending to be a relationship. If only the girl wants it to go somewhere, he’s more or less duping her.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 02:23 PM
1

I’m not saying people on the left aren’t often a dumb hive mind. I’m saying the fact people in a dumb hive mind happen to believe something doesn’t make that belief inherently false.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:03 PM
–

Yes, even when a lot of them are. It’s not addressing the substance of the argument and instead attacking the person themselves. It’s just a form of ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 07:55 PM
–

Some people who advocate for a position being retards doesn’t invalidate the position.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:50 PM
–

Brutal. Just getting called out when he might even lurk here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:07 PM
–

Send her to go fight him off. Equality!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 04:57 PM
2

So whats the cutoff here? 10% strength difference? 10 point IQ difference? How do I know when I’m now allowed to be friend with people? Also, are smart, strong guys just expected not to have friends? Odds are you will be able to either physical or intellectually overpower most people. Just die alone then?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 03:47 PM
–

She sat down in front of me and I immediately stood up and said “Nah this ain’t it” and then left her ass high and dry Based
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 11:09 PM
–

think they can make up for their face So they can’t actually make up for their face? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 08:38 PM
–

Reddit cares, and it isn’t even close. Someone cares about me! 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 07:03 PM
–

Thanks for the Reddit cares. Glad to know I’m appreciated. 😘
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 06:44 PM
2

Then I suppose that’s where I think red pill gets it wrong, at least superficially. I think they agree more than they realize. It’s quite clear that a number of traits disfavored in STRs ultimately lead to better LTRs. Agreeableness is one example; women like to sleep with disagreeable men but settle down with agreeable men. Red pill will even tacitly acknowledges this when they say that women “beta bucks” dudes for emotional support. Tbf, I think for many such traits TRP is correct insofar as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 06:34 PM
–

Tbf, I think you have to distinguish between what they want in short vs long term mating. The former is more similar than the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 05:59 PM
–

Unfortunately, you’re probably right
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 05:54 PM
–

Super good points, appreciate the link. I tend to agree that the black pill, broadly speaking, has a bit more accurate description of reality. And insofar as modern RP gets some stuff right (eg importance of height), it’s as a result of black pill influences. That said, I just wish black pill would drop the fucking fatalism. You can accept that there are negative characteristics that you can’t control while also not giving up and declaring “it’s over.” The number of guys that are totally, unreco…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 05:45 PM
–

Grats in advance on the tiny nuts. Hope it makes your dick look bigger
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 04:32 PM
1

Why are you so confident you will embarrass yourself? Why would embarrassing yourself a few times not be worth it to get a relationship you want? We all make blunders when dating. Even if we accept that you will always embarrass yourself (which we shouldn’t), what makes you think you can’t change that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 02:49 PM
1

I do think the stranger component probably makes some difference, but setting that aside, I guess I don’t appreciate the major difference aside from the fact you aren’t “supposed to” tell people they should smile more. I could make the argument that people express their mood through their clothes as well. If I’m dressing down because I’m just not feeling it today, someone saying “you should wear X clothes more often” is also saying “pretend you’re happy for me”in some sense. But for whatever rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 02:42 PM
2

Something like “you should wear that shirt more, it looks really good on you” is also a request, but most people (well, at least men) wouldn’t get all butt hurt over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 02:02 PM
1

That sucks. Yea, my pale ass would fry with only 30 as well. My “favorite” experience of borrowing someone else’s stuff is when I went tubing with some friends and one of the guys said I could borrow his spare tube. Turns out it had a small hole in it, so I had to keep repeatedly blowing it up as we are drifting down the river.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 02:00 PM
1

Chad energy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 01:57 PM
0

Damn, you bunched some panties with this one. The ladies here should consider smiling more.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 01:51 PM
2

“People”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 01:42 PM
3

Pretend?!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 03:55 AM
2

Oof, that sucks. Sorry to hear that, dude. Yea, i think I’d just call it at that point. She clearly isn’t that invested in seeing you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 12:19 AM
2

If she’s suggesting new times, then that isn’t the worst. Though 4 times is, again, pretty telling. Does she give you remotely plausible excuses for why she dips?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 11:19 PM
–

So tell me about how she’s blowing you off then. Because if she’s bailed on 4 dates in a row, that looks bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 11:13 PM
–

Dude, 2.5 months is a long fucking time. I’d bet a lot that you’re a plan B, yea. When “something comes up,” does she enthusiastically suggest another date option or just flake? If it’s the latter, she’s not that into you. Especially after 4 times.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 11:01 PM
–

No. I think it’s a matter of managing boundaries to not put yourself into that situation. I don’t even trust myself, much less a partner. Enough attraction, drugs, and romantic trouble and anyone will do it eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 10:55 PM
–

Obligatory “long distance relationships are imaginary relationships.” This is doubly true if you guys haven’t even slept together yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 10:12 PM
–

Well I still think believing in God is dumber than not. I just think there are also a lot of dumb atheists too. So maybe I’m still in it? One big change, though, is I used to think religion serves no purpose that you couldn’t otherwise solve secularly, but I don’t really think that anymore. I think there are some people who just need religion and can’t cope with a godless universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 08:39 PM
–

Oh you know. You’ve been a bad girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:44 PM
1

Well the first part is what I said, and the second part is addressing what chili said, given that your reply was “given what you and others have said.” Your claim is that these positions don’t entail certain policies, as best I can guess because I used the word “oppose” instead of “ban.” I’m saying that’s silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:33 PM
4

How is banning the use of hormone therapy in children not a policy? Same goes for stuff other people have said. Banning abortion, banning gay marriage, banning diversity quotas. Those are all concrete policies. This is some serious grasping at straws.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:28 PM
4

Baby trapping and false rape accusations are a bit different because those are serious ethical/legal violations Abuse is a serious ethical/legal violation as well. Cheating may not be legal anymore, but it is still ethical. At this point we are just haggling over price. I’m fine with holding women accountable for their poor judgments, we should just do the same for men dumb enough to get entangled with a crazy BPD chick. The point is about consistency.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:23 PM
3

Which addresses absolutely nothing I said. Emotional support is one of a few sufficient conditions for a woman to start a relationship with a man in the absence of significant attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:18 PM
5

Saying that you oppose giving hormone therapy to children would probably be a starting point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:13 PM
4

But why would you avoid marriage when you can just pick better? Easy fix! Besides, same applies to any relationship issue. Baby trapped? False rape accusation? Just pick better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:05 PM
2

Just tell them to post on PPD. I’m sure they will change their mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:02 PM
3

Lol, I respect the effort, at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:45 PM
9

Because sometimes people are hypocrites about it. You can say the same shit to men who got “divorce raped.” Just pick better, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:43 PM
2

Well if we mean below average at all, about half of them are lol. But snarky comment aside, I’m addressing your point that “if you’re not attractive to one woman, you will be attractive to another.” Even if a completely average guy could get a girl, that statement can still be false once we consider below average guys. That’s the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:38 PM
2

We aren’t even really talking about regular looking guys, though. We are talking about really below average guys. Have a seen a girl have loud sex every night with her short, fat boyfriend? No, no I haven’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:33 PM
1

Because they make good providers (and emotional support). Full circle! Also, really short and overweight isn’t exactly “normie” in totality. That’s solidly below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:29 PM
1

A super short, overweight guy with a normie face at best? Without any serious changes, I would.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:28 PM
2

That seems like an incredibly questionable assumption. You think any ladies out there are lusting after Danny Devito?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:25 PM
2

“Just be attractive, bro.”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:23 PM
3

I don’t think it bothers most men to be a provider. It bothers them to be ONLY a provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:21 PM
3

Not well. I’d start over and try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 06:10 PM
1

Sure, I agree. I think attractiveness is absolutely important in women. I just also think we should be realistic about how much of a role attractiveness plays in men as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 04:28 PM
1

One problem with this data is it’s estimates from GRE scores (because its easy). So it’s going to be estimates from the higher tier students who are at least looking at grad school. There’s an assumption of uniformity here which may very well not be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 04:27 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 04:18 PM
4

Lol! Exception: almost all of the actual smart guys. Your average communications major isn’t actually that smart despite the fact he’s pursuing a degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 04:08 PM
4

Until you realize that a huge number of smart women will still chase the good-looking dumb guys over smart, normie guys. At least until it’s time to “get serious,” settle down, and start a family. Then they start to hit up their fellow smart men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 03:56 PM
3

I was so sure you had written girlshumpingthings but put a link for the male subreddit. That seems like a very Ainsley thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 01:48 PM
1

Stahp
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 01:44 PM
3

Neither are really a problem for me as long as she’s being consistent. If I had to pick, I’d probably pick the second because a lot of women don’t seem to do particularly well with casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 05:12 AM
5

I don’t have sex at all to prevent myself from getting desensitized to my wife when she gets old.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:26 AM
2

Well I’m 29 and still get hit on by girls in undergrad. Outside if a professional environment, I typically get mistaken for 24-25. Make of that information what you will.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:18 AM
3

I don’t know what age you are now, but it pays dividends later. Much easier to pull younger, hotter girls once you hit your mid-late 20s. And as long as you act your age, it doesn’t really deter older women either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:11 AM
4

35 and look 25. I’m going to be 35 at some point either way, might as well look good doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:09 AM
1

Rofl! 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 01:38 AM
3

Is this cuck culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 11:05 PM
7

I can totally believe someone met a sperg that talks about “sexual market value” irl. There have got to be at least a few autists here that would say that shit IRL. That post reflected poorly on the “red pill” guy anyway. Are you saying one of the blue pill people did it? At the same time, the people here who don’t think partner count comes up at all are weird as fuck to me. I’ve had most girls actually be the ones to bring it up with me in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 03:35 PM
5

Because you are talking to different men and, shock of all shocks, they have different opinions. If you have developed such a taste for super hot guys to the point that it bothers you dating a normie guy, no, don’t lower your standards. You will both regret it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 02:58 PM
5

Please be creative writing, please be creative writing… Straight up, though, this is what I mean when I say women settle for less attractive men. The idea that women “don’t date guys that they aren’t attracted to” doesn’t rebut the claim. She’s kind of attracted to him, but there is clearly a significant disparity compared to what she’s used to. And what they do have may be driven largely by novelty, which will eventually fade away into nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 02:51 PM
2

There’s definitely a level of “A is better than B” but it’s way fuzzier than people make out. Totally agree, but I don’t think that impacts the concern much. I don’t think most people are that worried about minuscule differences when it comes to settling. It’s about a major disparity (ie being in different tiers) compared to past partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 02:22 PM
2

Lol, I’m obviously teasing, but I’m also driving at a point. I think the whole settling thing is driven partially by enforced monogamy forcing people into picking only one “food.” The reason we don’t have such a fierce competition and comparisons with food is we know we can get Indian today and Chinese tomorrow. You might not have a hard list in your head (though Ngl, I kinda to), but I have a feeling if someone was about to force you to only eat a single type of food for the rest of your life, …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 02:15 PM
2

Y’all don’t do it with food. Indian find is definitely better than Br*tish food.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 02:02 PM
7

Small penis. Some men like flat chested women. No women like tiny dicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 03:21 PM
3

I figure it’s fair game considering all of the “men are pigs” or even “men are dogs.” 🤷‍♂️ It’s also just an analogy. In hindsight, probably could have compared to kids too, though I’m sure that would rustle jimmies all the same. “Women are children” and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:53 PM
1

I think his issue is one of perspective. It seems like he has this tendency to want to look at women as defective men. It’s almost like knowing how they work and what they are attracted to just ruins the magic because they are so different that he just can’t love them anymore. But I don’t think that has to be true. Dogs do annoying stuff too. They will eat their own poop, drink from the toilet, chew up the furniture. But we have an expectation that that’s just something that dogs do and love the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:46 PM
2

I’d actually say it’s a little more accurate to say that they want a man that is better than other men, at least when it comes to physical traits. It’s his hierarchical rating among men which needs to be better than hers among women. And surely it’s obvious that being tall improves a man’s ranking in social/dominance hierarchies, no? I don’t think the average CEO being like 6’1” is a big ole’ coincidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:40 PM
4

It seems like a good thread, but I always find the platitudes like, “don’t sorry about the embarrassing things you did in the past. Nobody but you remembers,” kind of funny. Nah, dude. I remember all of the embarrassing shit I’ve seen people do. Someone definitely remembers.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:33 PM
1

Same. This is one of the subjects that I think TRP is off-base with. My favorite part is at least one of the studies showing women report not wanting a hot guy but then primarily chase hot guys also show that men claim they don’t like ambitious women, then chase ambitious women to some extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:28 PM
1

In their results. In case you forgot what I said: It references a number of other studies and again contains number ranging from ~40 to ~70%. To just orient you to the ~70% study: Similarly, Armstrong, England, and Fogarty (2010), examining a sample of undergraduates (N = 12,925), found that 67% of sexually active college seniors had casual sex. My whole criticism on this point is that the general lack of consensus should leave us very agnostic to the actual number, likely leaning on the higher …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:00 AM
2

Damn, this is a real struggle for you, huh? Try the third paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 01:01 AM
–

Yea, bro. You’re fine. While height can certainly a factor, if you’re doing well, you clearly have enough other positive features to compensate. A cold streak could be anything. Only meeting height queens. Getting in your own head over a few rejections. Uranus is in retrograde and all the astrology chicks become celibate. Who the fuck knows? Don’t let it get to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 12:48 AM
1

There’s a second study linked in the article, dude. It references a number of other studies and again contains number ranging from ~40 to ~70%. But to reiterate, casual sex rates could be 0% and it wouldn’t matter for the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 11:44 PM
8

Yep, pretty much this. I addressed it in my own comment, but LTRs that “aren’t that serious” and aimed at solely sexual chemistry are all you really need. It doesn’t have to actually be “really” casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:14 PM
3

Well there are a few layers to this. For starters, I didn’t specify only casual sex. The only thing my argument requires is that people (particularly women) have dated primarily for sexual chemistry at one point and changes their tune later on. This seems fairly obviously true imo. It’s quite common for people to have “long term” relationships that they know “aren’t going anywhere” or “aren’t that serious.” While these aren’t technically casual sex, they are aimed solely at sexual chemistry all …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:13 PM
–

As much as the cult of Elon can make me cringe at times, I gotta admit, dude is funny as fuck sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:47 PM
–

Total opposite. When I get time off, my goal is to do sweet fuck all and relax.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:16 PM
–

Holy shit, you posted a second girl that I think is attractive. I knew it would happen! That shit’s trashy as fuck, but she’s attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 05:04 PM
1

Rofl, I’m really the worst
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:59 PM
49

I think this criticism is flawed on a couple of levels. First, you seem to assume that everyone is someone else’s “second best,” but this is far from obvious. If we generally agree that women are tending to sleep with higher tier guys, the obvious corollary is that men are tending to sleep with lower tier women. This makes it a lot more likely that a man is settling down with his “best,” while a woman is settling down with her second (or tenth) “best.” The other aspect is the way men vs women se…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:55 PM
2

I don’t think they consciously think like this, I think it’s more subconscious but nonetheless subversive. I absolutely think you’re right about the fact that the novelty of past hookups drives things, but if anything, that compounds the problem. If a “relationship” ends before all of the bad bits come to light, it risks having the comparison made to an idealized representation rather than the real thing. There’s no “getting tired of fucking them” realization. It takes a level of introspection t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:11 PM
1

That’s why I also included social approval. A lot of women like to pretend they are doing those things only for their own self gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:40 PM
1

Check the bearded one in the comments
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:39 PM
1

You think so? I didn’t look at it too carefully
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:23 PM
2

It’s in the top comment thread, lol. Who is being lazy now?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:20 PM
2

I got you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:18 PM
10

I’ve always been muscular and moderately tall, but going from probably 20ish% bf to 12-13% was enough to go from minimal interest from women to actively getting approached and hit on by women. As other have said, people in general will treat you so much nicer. It makes you really cynical about how superficial people are. I never overdid it, but i was definitely a bit too obsessive about it at one point. I did this when I was in my late teens, so no loose skin or anything. I have some minor stret…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:15 PM
19

I think OP paints it a little black and white, but I think I there’s something to be said for dating someone very desirable and settling down with someone significantly less desirable (but not necessarily undesirable). We know a strong predictor of relationship failure is feeling like one could do better. Seems like having “had” better (if only for a night or two) puts you at a strong risk of resenting the less desirable person you end up with. It’s not about settling with totally repulsive men,…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:04 PM
3

No, but I think a lot more of what they do is for social/male approval than they like to pretend. For example, if women were wearing makeup “for themselves,” they would do it at home. But the overwhelming majority don’t. Same for men. We do more than we like to pretend. I’d bet a lot more guys would work chill, medium earning jobs and have no interest in pushing to higher earning management positions if they were just staying single. I know I would.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:58 PM
1

Then the argument that it’s good for relationships doesn’t seem to be a good justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:36 PM
5

Young women are hot so men like to date them? Do you have an example of an old dude going after young women because he can’t get older women. I find that really hard to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 03:49 AM
1

God damn it, you’re right. I butchered it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:49 AM
3

Average fucking chump. Old PUA term iirc. Edit: frustrated*
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:47 AM
2

But you are just talking about sex with this chick, not a relationship, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:19 AM
2

Realize that all you really missed was a little bit of exercise with a sticky ending with a particularly attractive person. If you value your relationship with your girlfriend, surely it’s worth so much more than that, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:09 AM
2

Literally me right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:59 AM
1

I did not get this reference
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:51 AM
2

Oh no, a paradox!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:39 AM
3

No bitches?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:36 AM
2

If you’re taking everything you read here seriously, I have some bad news. Doubly so if you read my posts, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:36 AM
4

Yea, it’s one of those funny illustration of how entitled women can be in their confrontations with men. They just assume nothing bad could possibly happen. A man her size would NEVER talk to me like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 12:06 AM
8

I think my favorite similar story was when I was at a restaurant with some friends of mine. We were standing in a kind of narrow corridor waiting to be seated, and this woman is walking out. We all scoot over to leave an opening for her, but to avoid grinding all over my friend, I scoot over such that she would have to very slightly move to the right to avoid hitting me. Obviously she doesn’t adjust at all and barely brushes shoulders with me. She turns around and Karens all over me, shouting “h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 11:56 PM
2

I don’t know about high school, but I’d 100% go back to college, especially the first 2 years. That’s the most free time I’ve had in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 11:46 PM
2

Yea. It was a survey on gender differences in literature interest iirc. Probably not perfect, but a decent proxy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 11:36 PM
1

Man… Wait for it …bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 11:12 PM
2

Then in disagreeing, you rebut OP’s entire point. He’s relying on the idea that this is apparently an accepted truth about how women operate, but that the consequences of accepting it are concerning. Though maybe he just hasn’t gotten to you yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 09:17 PM
2

Well i left mine generally for a reason (saying socially positive trait), because it literally doesn’t matter what the trait is. Any trait anyone could conceivably construe as making someone a “good man,” whether that be being kind, caring for society, loving your family, or playing with puppies. It could come down to each individual woman’s concept of “virtue.” OP’s entire promise is that people on here supposedly now broadly agree that this isn’t something women prioritize over looks; she will…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 09:03 PM
1

Honestly, while I think he articulates his points fairly well, I actually think his premise is fundamentally flawed. He seems to suggest that what happens is the women are avoiding this conclusion about needing social change. Instead, I think the conclusion women are trying to avoid is simply “women care about [superficial trait] more than [socially positive trait] (eg virtue).” It’s comes down to basic impression management and maintaining the facade that women are chasing primarily good men. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:36 PM
3

You make a good point on poems, I do technically know more women who have written poetry than men, though that number is incredibly small (and actually wasn’t really people I would consider particularly smart, incidentally). The difference I see in instruments is most girls I know who “play” instrument learned it as a kid and don’t really do it anymore. The guys are super passionate and practice very regularly. Perhaps not the best example. I could try to dig up a source, but I actually saw a su…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:06 PM
1

You can get a tan while using something like SPF 30 sunscreen, easy. I’m also perhaps relating it back to OP more than you intended. He was saying he tans too fast, which is really a good thing as far as sun damage is concerned. SPF 2-4 is only a “base tan” on a white person to my knowledge. Other ethnicities and darker tans can get much higher. To be clear, I also only mean incidentally getting a tan, not actually going out and tanning. That’s dumb as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:53 PM
1

Tanning isn’t directly about sun damage, though. It’s about melanin production which, while stimulated by the sun, varies significantly between people. People who don’t tan well tend to have a much higher risk of sun damage for that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:43 PM
1

You’re free to accuse me of being an unreliable observer, but that accusation cuts both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:36 PM
5

Sometimes they get baited by the “I don’t want to jeopardize our friendship” card and feel like if they give themself some space then they are a bad person. They kind of get stuck in a catch 22. If they pull back, they were a bad friend and were “obviously” only there for the sex. I’d they stick around, they are just a spineless orbiter who can’t let go, and it becomes a lot harder to break the emotional connection to move on to someone else, perpetuating their attachment to the girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:25 PM
3

Interest in philosophy, history, religion, politics. Taking up creative pursuits like writing a book, inventing or designing something/becoming an entrepreneur, learning/playing an instrument. You name it. Almost all smart men I know have an interest in at least a few of the topics above. But I’ve known and dated quite a lot of smart women, and it’s almost shocking how quite often the only subject that they will reliably express interest in is politics, but exclusively with respect to feminism o…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:22 PM
2

women’s hobbies are sleeping and watching Netflix. What exactly do you call this? Basically everyone would agree that a dude who only sleeps and plays call of duty is boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:08 PM
0

Yep, I totally agree. The whole “we” beat “you guys” culture around sports is super cringe imo. Though I will offer the hot take that I think, on balance, there are more boring women than men. For instance, ime smart women are a lot more likely to still have zero interests in intellectual pursuits (outside of work) than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:07 PM
5

Some of you are interesting and a pleasure to talk to. Most of you think thirst trapping on Instagram and watching the kardashians count as hobbies. PS: I bet your fossils are super cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:54 PM
2

I think to get no relationship at all, he’s have to be broke as fuck. Even a stable job as something like a garbage man or construction worker is enough to get an LTR with a lower class woman. It’s more a matter of limiting his options unless he’s seriously broke, to the point it probably suggests a more general dysfunction. Sure, if he wants higher class or smarter woman it could sting a bit. But I think given the option of getting an LTR with a lower class woman who is really into me vs having…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:47 PM
6

Neurotypical-maxx. Women are not boring people. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:36 PM
6

He would get a lot of women willing to sleep with him but would struggle to get (or at least maintain) a stable LTR. Aiming at lower class women would probably help, but it would probably still depend on just how broke he was.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:30 PM
2

I was about to say no. But if we remove their freedom of speech, does that also remove their freedom to complain? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:19 PM
1

Too slim
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:04 PM
2

Damn, I like this burn. 10/10
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:00 PM
1

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:00 PM
1

That’s still a woman, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:12 PM
1

What if I want the real thing, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:09 PM
4

But what if I like pussies and just don’t like the women attached to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 03:58 PM
1

I do too, which is telling considering the best evidence suggests out testosterone levels are lower primarily because we are fat fucks and don’t exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 03:14 PM
1

Shhh, you aren’t supposed to say that part out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 03:05 PM
1

Keeps things interesting. If I was going to give a more serious response, I’d point out that men are basically just asking that their level of interest in the average woman be reciprocated for the average man. Female pickiness aside, it doesn’t seem that unreasonable on its face. Women unfortunately just don’t work like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:38 PM
3

Just be famous and hot 4head.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:32 PM
3

Huh, that’s the opposite take I had. I was going to say this is really ironic coming from a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:05 PM
1

Yea, looks like something an elf in LotR would wear
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:01 PM
3

How did you even come up with that monstrosity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:06 AM
2

Do you get me telling you you’re a big meanie, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 12:46 AM
5

Giving up on securing your beta bucks already?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 12:41 AM
7

My daughter? I’d warn the guy she’s probably a gold digger. Bros before hoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 12:02 AM
4

Yes. As much as I’ll deal with women’s games if I have to, I strongly prefer not to play them. I’m not a mind reader. Just use your words like an adult. It’s also incredibly hard to hurt my feelings, so there isn’t a much of a downside to bluntness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 11:16 PM
8

Depends what you mean. Lowercase f feminist? Identifies as a feminist for “equality,” and holds all the same pro-female opinions that basically all women hold? Sure. Capital F Feminist? Blames everything on men and patriarchy? Not a chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 09:36 PM
3

Some angles can be super deceptive. Add filters and it can get crazy. /r/InstagramReality
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 06:15 PM
2

I agree with both points. But they that still don’t necessarily mean personality is a primary selection criterion. All I’m saying is “just be great in all the other ways first and then personality matters,” can be misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 06:03 PM
2

Sure, but the typical question is how much is it fair to say that personality “matters” when looks (or other factors) encapsulate most of the predictive power. It might be like saying “personality matters for being a CEO, you just have to meet all of the other requirements first. You have to be able to get along with people, after all!” Like sure, it probably helps a bit. But it would be a waste of time to tell people to work in their personality if they wanted to be a CEO.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:38 PM
3

Women are attracted to their looksmatch all the time. I probably should have been more clear. Women go for same or better, just not lower. That’s the discrepancy; men will absolutely aim lower. Looksmatch is still the same. Point applies to women treating their average husbands like kings too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:27 PM
3

Jesus, what’s with these false binaries. Lusting over women hotter than you =/= only being attracted to women hotter than you. Just because they’re open to using women they don’t find that attractive as cum rags doesn’t mean they wouldn’t give better treatment to then women they find most attractive. If we set aside the hyperbole, I broadly agree with this part. But I don’t see why denying it is necessary for the argument. Just because a lot of men would fall over themselves for a bombshell does…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:17 PM
2

But the point is that women want dudes that are better than they are. Men don’t need that. Having any standards at all =/= requiring a woman better than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:10 PM
2

Not ugly women, but I’d absolutely fuck 100 totally average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter