~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.Oh I am glad you apply labels because I go against your subjective morals. You are pathetic. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/12 02:52 AM |
| -10 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.Circumcision does not harm a newborn nor does it cause problems later in life. And yes naming is the samething. So by your logic now, we cannot give newborns vaccine, name them, or circumcise them. They do not give consent. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 06:30 PM |
| -10 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.Genital mutilation? You act like they can never have sex or use their genitals. You are highly overreacting. As a parent I have a choice to do what I please. By your logic then we shouln't even get to name our kids. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 06:16 PM |
| -4 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.Ask a newborn how old they are and then ask a pre-teen how old they are. Let me know what happens. A law prevents a person from raping? Are you suggesting if laws did not exist, all fathers would rape their children? Or you at least suggest this would happen often if there were no laws. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 05:40 PM |
| -6 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.I said newborns, not twelve year olds. Please read properly. Also, laws are irrelevant here. I would roll back every law so it is not a valid question. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 05:18 PM |
| -4 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.Parent can choose whatever they want for their newborns. If we go by that logic then newborns cannot get vaccinated because they did not consent to it. They must wait till they can make the decision. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 05:07 PM |
| -10 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.A newborn is barely coherent. If I am going to feed, clothe, and shelter him then I can circumcise him also. Yes it is his body, but that logic fails as he is a newborn and I am the parent. I was circumcised and never resented anyone for it. It isn't this god awful thing. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 04:57 PM |
| -9 | I think that before women are so quick to justify circumcision, they should watch it actually being done. WARNING. GRAPHIC and HORRIFYING.I am circumcised and all my sons will be too | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 04:41 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter