TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EagleDarkX Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by EagleDarkX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This is wholesome, thank you. Best to you!
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/20 11:46 AM
2

I am not used to a decent response like this on reddit. I don't know what to do now.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/20 11:41 AM
3

What kind of response is this?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/20 11:31 AM
1

Anyone else that thinks bringing her dead dad into this that she clearly loved is considered a dick move? Like can't we just not be fragile and let it go instead of this shit? Can we stop with eye for an eye?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/20 10:34 AM
1

They're both dumb, the guy just uses weird deflections that don't hit the core of her argument. He didn't destroy a feminist, he danced around the argument so long that she gave up and then went on to give an undeserved speech. Arrogant and nothing else.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/20 06:32 AM
-3

Cannabis addiction is some real shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 05:26 AM
3

It is a little pathetic to make everything about yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 05:49 AM
-3

Jesus Christ reddit, why are you bullying a teenage girl? How fragile are you guys?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/19 09:06 AM
1

Consequences? What's that?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 06:35 AM
3

All this tells me is that women's football isn't as corrupt yet.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/19 01:25 PM
1

The google doodle has nothing to do with comments though? Why can't you formulate a good reason to care? You clearly care, but why?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:27 PM
-1

Because I'm wondering, why do you care mate? Why are you so bothered by this?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 12:02 PM
-1

I said the same thing. Why do you care?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 11:27 AM
-1

So what if they do? Why do you care?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 11:04 AM
-32

Why do you care? Need validation for your existence? I'm glad Reddit isn't representative of all people, masculinity thankfully isn't actually this fragile irl.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 12:29 PM
-3

Unfortunately for this movement, this is an extremely rare occurrence.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 08:56 PM
1

There are certain rules and boundaries that you need to set You don't, they're adults, they can live however they want. They'll set rules themselves. Why would you think they can't? Seems a bit arrogant to think you're the only person in a relationship able to set boundaries. People in a healthy relationship set boundaries for themselves. As for the forcing part I didn't see OP mentioning any beating or punishment for non-compliance Manipulation is another way you can force people into things. I…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 10:16 AM
1

You're not their parent, they can still do what they want. He's forcing her out of things she wants for selfish reasons.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 08:20 AM
1

Sorry for invading your safe-space with some much needed criticism. You can tell I don't take to safe spaces, because I go to this sub and discuss stuff with people like you with different opinions. This sub is a safe-space, a massive echo chamber where the bullshit OP is promoting is accepted as "reasonable" if not a little mild. The outside world thinks it's insane, and sometimes you need some words from the outside to avoid your echo-chamber from becoming actually dangerous. This sub may alre…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 07:45 AM
1

It bears repeating, OP is an asshole. manipulation is not good nor evil. HAH! if this is how you start your defense, you just know you're being an asshole. Let me repeat, OP is a twat to his gf. He doesn't care about his girl's feelings and her personal satisfaction. He cares only about what he gets out of it. That's being a twat. He should grow up and let her live the way she wants to.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 07:28 AM
1

it is possible to be an assertive alpha without also being an asshole. Example: I forbid my girlfriend from eating sugary snacks like ice cream. This an example of you being an asshole. But I don't want to be a manipulative asshole and cause her more psychological anguish than necessary, so I frame my subtle manipulations in a more positive light. "I don't want to be too manipulative, so I'm manipulative in the way I manipulate her!" People on this sub won't call you out on your BS, but I will. …
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 07:12 AM
1

Maybe there aughta be. TFW people on a men's rights subreddit knows nothing about men's rights...
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:45 PM
1

It's not like there's an entire fucking month dedicated to prostate cancer...
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:42 PM
-7

When people ask me what insecurity means, I'm gonna show them this post.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 08:04 AM
1

How would you know? There is no reliable data due to small sample sizes.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:38 AM
1

That sounds very ignorant.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 04:49 AM
2

The url of the post, concerning your first point. Also, your link says that studies are unreliable because of low sample size.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 10:13 PM
0

Look at the URL.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 10:02 PM
-3

How is this okay?? Because the statistics say that most violence against women is caused by a man.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:11 PM
1

TIL Men are seriously fragile and insecure.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 02:57 PM
1

I'm sorry for turning your only source against you. I'm not sorry actually, you could have learned from it, but you're too much up your own arse to accept it. I'll let you pretend you steamrolled my arguments tomorrow. I mean, I'll find at least some flaws, but I'll save them from you, don't want to make things too uncomfortable. :)
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 09:30 PM
2

You're free to do whatever you want. Don't imply profession where there is none. You're not exactly a big picture, connect-the-dots type of thinker, are you? I don't think this means anything in this context, but no, I am not a conspiracy theorist. My study involves taking premises and applying them strictly, but cautiously. A "connect-the-dots type of thinker" makes assumptions that are often bogus.
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 09:07 PM
1

I don't think you study evolutionary science. Why should I take you as an authority? completely overlooking the fact that women cannot marry what isn't available to them. Perhaps she's got a good career but her face resembles a baboon's ass - yeah, that is going to limit her options. So you're assuming that all poor people are married to ugly? That's the wildest fucking assumption I have ever seen. Please, do read up on the fundamentals of evolutionary science. I highly recommend Richard Dawkins…
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 08:43 PM
6

Also: yes. Every single woman is a golddigger, to a degree. There are women who don't give a shit about the wealth of their husband. That's why poor people get married sometimes. The fact that you only know gold diggers says more about the people in your environment (and thus about yourself) than women in general.
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 04:39 PM
5

Also: yes. Every single woman is a golddigger, to a degree. What is marriage, really? A contractual exchange between sex and resources. accepted science Bullshit you made up is not considered "accepted science"
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 04:14 PM
1

... It literally is. It sends me to the wayback machine with an error...
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:33 PM
1

Limiting right to custody is not equivalent to joint custody.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:33 PM
1

It's shitty that that happened, but one mistake does not constitute an evil organisation. Besides, that's just one side of the story, it's anecdotal. I don't know the specifics, and there may even be bias in your story about a friend, so I really can't judge at all.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:32 PM
1

You misread that first part horribly. WHEREAS organizations advocating "fathers' rights," whose members consist of non-custodial parents, their attorneys and their allies, are a growing force in our country; and WHEREAS the objectives of these groups are to increase restrictions and limits on custodial parents' rights and to decrease child support obligations of non-custodial parents by using the abuse of power in order to control in the same fashion as do batterers; and It says that it's the go…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 02:49 PM
1

I'd love to, but the link is broken. I just went off of your quote. Which supports nothing of what you're saying. there's no point in discussing it anyway. You're in your echo chamber, and all this illogical, made up nonsense will just get upvoted because I'm challenging the echo. Even though you were arguing something completely made up off of a quote that doesn't support your point, you get the honor. There's literally no point in talking to you, because your nonsense will get backed up by the…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 02:41 PM
1

I'm not quoting, I'm paraphrasing, but the meaning is the same... And you just made that up...
/r/MensRights09/05/17 02:21 PM
1

You're making that up. They're saying IF you're an abusive dad and IF you get custody THEN we'll publish that. they don't say IF you get custody THEN you're an abusive dad. That's 100% made up. You can't just make up shit that supports your views.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:47 PM
1

Then the kids shouldn't be anywhere near the mother.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:08 AM
0

They're not saying that... at all...
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:41 PM
0

No...? Even sharing kids with an abusive dad is shit. That's the point.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:20 PM
-2

You literally didn't get anything of what I said, did you? It's not a majority of feminists, that's survivor bias. You only hear the shitty ones, not the normal ones.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:45 PM
1

But they're not loaded. Either you agree or you don't. Google "loaded question" When people that aren't particularly smart say "logical fallacy" when there is no fallacy it doesn't make them look smart, just so you know. I'm pointing out it's a logical fallacy, because it literally fucking is. I'm pointing at a pink car and stating it is pink. It has nothing to do with trying to sound smart.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:31 PM
0

I assume if it were incorrect you would have pointed out where it's inaccurate. ... Do I have to point out that you made it up? This is what it says: THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that state and local National Organization for Women (NOW) chapters are encouraged to take steps to make the justice system and the public aware of this trend by working with existing women's shelters and court advocates to establish court watches, document cases of court gender bias, document cases of abusers gaining cust…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:29 PM
2

I did, I misread. I edited it now.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:27 PM
2

Woop, loaded question with a condescending tone! I have no clue where you're going with this, it makes no sense. You're arguing labels, not content, just to prove your point. It has nothing to do with the fact that feminism is, in essence, about equality (we have far strayed from that.)
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:24 PM
0

That's why they oppose shared custody as a default. That's a weird way to summarize that... And by weird, I mean incorrect.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:19 PM
2

I don't think you read the thing I sent you. The point is that you don't make a point based on anything. Everything that should have been a point was just fallacy. Reflecting it on me is a bit shit, since you're still not making a point based on anything. You're just shooting loaded questions, hoping to get something where you can go "OH, SO YOU HATE FEMINISM TOO THEN? COOL!", which shows that you have no clue what we're arguing. Yes, I know you're out for that, because it's what you did. The th…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:15 PM
-2

Actions speak louder than dictionary definitions. I don't think you understand what you're arguing. Some groups use the label of "feminism" even though they don't always support all feminist views. Do you need me to carve that into your skull, or can you remember that? Anyway, read. Also, your challenge is stated in a ridiculous way. "give me a movement of women that says women should put themselves at danger!" It's an impossible task because "dangerous jobs for [group]" is exactly the title you…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:07 PM
3

You don't know my definition of shitty. It is all flat out strawman. It clearly is. We clearly don't agree, you just stopped arguing and started a tantrum when you couldn't win your precious argument. It's kind of pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:46 PM
-1

I need specifics, because they may be right. If the husband is an abuser, the kids should be nowhere near him.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:45 PM
3

... Dude, are strawmanning everything then? Have you never had a normal discussion? Does everyone refuse to discuss things with you because you act this way?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:44 PM
4

Yeah, I'm aware, but the majority of feminist movements are about equality. Groups like that only hurt the proper feminist movements. There's also a case of survivor bias there: You only hear about the shitty "feminist" organisations, because they do shitty things. You don't hear about the other ones, because the only way you can actually fight for equality is behind the scenes.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:53 PM
3

Oh, so you first redefine feminism to something you hate, and the ridicule all feminists for it. I recommend using a different term, because this way, you're never going to get any point across to anyone else. It is true that some "feminists" have gone way too far, but never judge a group by it's worst example, just like how you should never judge Christians by their pedophiles, or Muslims by their terrorist. You could make any group look shit that way.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:46 PM
1

The thing is that your arguing is so shitty that I refuse to answer. You have had a fallacy per message, even though they're short. "Do you support sex discrimination..." makes your question a loaded question. No, I do not approve of quota to force 50/50 splits on genders, partly because gender isn't binary ;) But this doesn't make me no feminist. Which is why your question is not only loaded, but 100% pointless.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:27 PM
4

So first you change the definition of feminism, then you attempt a strawman, and you follow it up by a loaded question? Your point has nothing to do with anything. I'd need to look at specifics, a self-proclaimed feminist does not necessarily fulfill feminist ideals. At this point, you're focusing more on the label than it's contents.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:21 PM
3

That has nothing to do with anything? I never said that? If you're gonna do a strawman argument, don't forget the argument, just a strawman is pointless.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:16 PM
-3

No, they're descriptive, meaning that when people use the word feminism, they're generally talking about equality of sexes. The phrase "feminism is about equal rights" is often parroted and so it is the definition used by dictionaries. That's because it's literally what it's about. They use those words to describe it because it's a description of feminism. You can't just say "yeah, the dictionary says that a lamp produces light, but that's because people always say that it produces light, it doe…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:14 PM
-10

Even the dictionary disagrees with you.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:07 PM
3

Feminism is about equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 10:06 AM
3

IDK, you just seem butthurt that you can't get your toy.
/r/askMRP17/04/17 09:00 AM
1

I'm not saying there is one though, I never made a claim, you did. I only pointed out that the comic missed the point of discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:18 PM
1

Are there any reliable statistics and complete that demonstrate that there is no wage gap, or are you assuming that?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 12:49 PM
-1

The point is that women should get paid equally for equal work. The comic shows different work.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 11:59 AM
-1

I made a mistake there, nevertheless, the comic is still completely missing the point.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 11:08 AM
-3

Whoosh.... I don't think you understand this wage gap very well.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:42 AM
4

yeah, rational women and irrational ideologies like TRP don't go together. Maybe you should ditch TRP.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/17 08:47 AM
27

Factually incorrect. Saying that science has proven something doesn't mean science has proven it. Stop being disrespectful and be nice to people who live different lives than yours.
/r/PussyPass22/02/17 05:17 PM
-1

You'd literally be going there to provoke a response. That's a dick move. You'd deserve to be banned even.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 10:30 AM
-1

no shit, provocation should always be removed.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 10:08 AM
-1

The man should have taken responsibility in making sure she'd never get pregnant in the first place. We have the tools, use them.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 10:08 AM
-5

People care so little about the google home page that nobody noticed that this is an ancient screenshot.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:38 AM
0

Awww :)
/r/MGTOW08/10/16 06:08 PM
1

Something like one month would be just as effective. The damage to her reputation would already be done by sentencing against her, and would stop her from doing it again. Anytime she did do it again, she would immediately be pulled into question anyway, because of her history. Those 8 months extra don't do anything. you're not exactly keeping a danger to society out of it, because as bad as false accusations are, nobody got physically harmed, and and other damages were mostly resolved after the …
/r/MensRights21/08/16 11:09 AM
-1

I was going to answer, but then I read the last bit of you just rambling nonsense, making me realise that whatever I say, it doesn't mean anything to you if I don't agree. I'll just leave you with this: I don't ever think 9 months is reasonable for false accusations. It's too long. The same goal could be achieved with just a month.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 12:16 AM
-1

(I'd abolish the death penalty, but that's besides the point) Attempted murder is someone actually trying to consciously fucking murder someone. This is, at most, ruining someone's reputation temporarily, because she hasn't got any evidence. She should be punished, but NINE fucking MONTHS in jail is too much to me.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 11:05 PM
-2

I'm not saying it's not criminal, but 9 months is harsh. This is nothing like attempted murder.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:30 PM
-29

False accusations are bad, but jail for 9 months? Seems rather excessive to me.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:03 PM
1

That second link, doesn't that also work with "SJW"?
/r/MensRights09/08/16 10:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter