Eaglone Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
337	The Tea app shows the social attitude towards men	misandry	Eaglone	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/07/25 05:14 PM
76	A main driver of misogyny in young men is being expected to follow male gender roles	discussion	Eaglone	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/04/25 06:49 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
5	Women want to be sexy, but hate the men who sexualize them 'Women only dress up for themselves' is one of those nonsensical Reddit talking-points. It sounds feminist and absolute, and signifies tribal allegiance to the kind of leftist feminism common on Reddit. But it's also obviously irrational, and nobody who actually acknowledges the reality of the situation would believe it. The people advocating it just like the idea that women are all feminist girlboss icons sticking it to the patriarchy and not caring about men, even when they're aware that women…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/08/25 04:20 PM
8	Hot take: (CMV) The "Healthy Masculinity" feminism pushes is more toxic than the toxic masculinity I mean, obviously a lot of what Reddit portrays as 'positive masculinity' feels fake, because the people talking about it don't care about masculinity. They just want to take their own, feminist ideology, and wrap it up as 'masculine.' Like most things on Reddit, it's motivated by internet politics and ideology without any concern for reality. However, feminists off the internet don't always subscribe to any particular vision of 'positive masculinity.' People's preferences concerning the other g…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/07/25 05:20 PM
26	Do charities like this one really have good reasons to be gynocentric? Women and children are always seen as more vulnerable and victimized. So setting up a charity in their name makes it much easier to get donations, because people will be more sympathetic towards it. Women are seen as perpetual victims, and, because of feminist vilification of men, we are now seen as perpetual oppressors, rapists and predators, who are worse than bears. People then get shocked when young men are hostile towards modern liberal feminism.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/07/25 03:46 PM
6	r/MensLib is the Richard Reeves of subreddits It's not just controlled opposition, it's Reddit controlled opposition. It's a bunch of Reddit feminists trying to pretend that they're also in favour of men, even though they're misandrist to the core. They spend more time insisting that they aren't hateful and care about women too, and such little time talking about actual men's issues that it comes across as disingenuous. Honestly just an embarrassment of a sub.	/r/MensRights	15/07/25 06:38 PM
3	It’s hard being a man, it’s almost a curse Yeah, there's all kinds of ridiculous accusations being thrown around now. Here in the UK, there's posters hung up about how 'staring' is illegal sexual harassment and can be reported to the police, and stuff like this happens: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/student-who-searched-how-make-20555360 You literally just talked to a girl who didn't like it, but that's apparently also enough to be considered 'harassment.' I feel like modern society promotes a one-dimensional view of men as preda…	/r/MensRights	15/07/25 06:35 PM
2	Red pill misinterprets western historical dating and marriage patterns for non western ones He was at war at the time, so a bit too busy to have flings. And most of what he was saying at the time was love letters like, "You to whom nature has given spirit, sweetness, and beauty, you who alone can move and rule my heart, you who know all too well the absolute empire you exercise over it!" Napoleon got angry at hearing about Josephine's infidelity, and got involved with his mistresses later.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/07/25 09:53 PM
7	Red pill misinterprets western historical dating and marriage patterns for non western ones Josephine was having affairs with other men, though? Being an Emperor doesn't mean that your partner is faithful, and Napoleon was married to her before he became Emperor anyway.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/07/25 09:42 AM
-1	Is there any redpill movies or any movies or shows that reinforced your belief? Sure, but the 'bluepill' ideas which TRP distinguishes itself from aren't necessarily a transhistorical 'default.' It's true that the bluepill is an artificial construct which is nebulously defined, but I also wouldn't reduce the redpill to a 'rebrand' when there wasn't a brand in the first place. Before the modern default or 'bluepill,' previous ideas often resembled the redpill and would be considered controversial today. The redpill-bluepill stuff reflects wider historical trends and the issu…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 07:24 PM
2	Is there any redpill movies or any movies or shows that reinforced your belief? That's because Bond's story comes from an era where those ideas were more common. A lot of the common attitudes to women back then, or in the Arabic world now, would draw a lot of scrutiny from modern feminism and movements like #MeToo. For example, this is from the books:	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 06:59 PM
0	Is there any redpill movies or any movies or shows that reinforced your belief? That's not a nuanced enough take IMO. Many 'redpill' ideas were fairly common in previous generations, when it wasn't even possible to 'rebrand' the bluepill because it wasn't invented yet. Both the 'bluepill' and 'redpill' are modern constructs, and before that there wouldn't have been as much of a distinction. The redpill is often based on patriarchal norms which were common in previous societies, but would generally be rejected by the modern bluepill. Ultimately, feminism may have become comm…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 06:33 PM
1	If I want to know what kind of men women truly find desirable, should I look at (A) husbands OR (B) the men you are crushing on, flirting with, swiping right on, hooking up, having sexual flings, FWB and situation-ships with? Yeah, plenty of men who are literally psychopaths and view others as objects have been highly sexually successful. We shouldn't pretend that people who are sexually successful are some kind of respectful, genteel ideal, when in practice they're often quite brash.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 08:55 AM
2	The same instinct and drive that makes men want to sleep with women is the same instinct and drive than makes women be extremely selective Whereas with men it's a case of if she hits a bear minimum standard, she's a potential option and you're happy to explore a relationship with her and probably have sex with her. Absolutely. When your average man looks at a woman, his first thought is about how much she resembles a bear. If she has, say, a thick coat of fur and large teeth, then she's relationship material. She hits a minimum standard for bear-ness. Given a choice between a woman and a bear, men will always choose the bear.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/25 03:53 PM
6	If I could guarantee you that 1 out of every 40 guys you approach is your ideal man, would you start cold approaching? Why or why not? Yeah, tbh most of this thread is a knee-jerk reaction to the idea of approaching men, rather than a rational response to the scenario put forwards in the OP. Most people don't get the opportunity to meet their dream partner at all, but people here are saying they'd turn down a simple 1/40 guarantee of approaching him? That's as weird as turning down a genie's three wishes because you hate lamps.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/25 01:55 PM
1	If I could guarantee you that 1 out of every 40 guys you approach is your ideal man, would you start cold approaching? Why or why not? In this case, do we even know that he 'doesn't like' to approach? The woman, since she has a guaranteed payout, has much more incentive to approach strangers in the OP situation. Men might not feel the need to approach random women who they're just passing by, because they simply don't know her and have better venues to approach women. But since she knows that 1/40 is going to be ideal, she has much more reason to approach. Most men who aren't literal PUAs won't be approaching unknown women all …	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/25 01:40 PM
7	If the roles were reversed and women were held to the same dating standards as men they would be just as hateful and bitter I think you're conflating attractiveness and social status. Objectively, the upper-class daughter of a millionaire has much more social status than a cashier. People from posh neighborhoods and social circles live completely different lives from most ordinary people, and definitely have higher 'social status.'	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/25 04:42 AM
9	CMV: Being a SAHM is easily one of the hardest jobs in the world Um, sweatshops? Dangerous, unregulated jobs such as mining and construction in many parts of the world? The army? Being a Western SAHM isn't really even comparable to that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/06/25 03:14 AM
22	The post-#MeToo culture and the rise of dating apps gave men a reality check <image> It's a commonly observed trend.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/06/25 03:09 PM
20	Society did not “lie” to you about what was and wasn’t attractive to women. You are not a “victim”. True, OP seems to be barking at the clouds here. Tons of guys from that generation have attested to receiving this message and becoming disillusioned by it, and OP is claiming this never happened based only on their own experience. It's fairly obvious that it was quite a common experience, even if OP can't relate. Even nowadays, there are plenty of people who will suggest that relationships are a measure of good personality or worth due to just world fallacy, and the most extreme of those are on…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/06/25 04:29 PM
1	There´s no hope for marriage as an institution because there are 0 repurcussions for infidelity Marriage might well plummet, especially given the post-COVID decline in socialization and gender relations. But it could still survive, simply because it's a massive industry and gives people a big occasion to look forward to. It's the same way that Christmas has survived despite countries becoming less religious, because by now it's largely a commercial holiday divorced from its original purpose. Likewise, even if marriage no longer represents fidelity and childbirth has declined, it will proba…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/06/25 04:23 PM
1	Historically, the average dude likely never found academics easy Um, Steve Jobs was a weird example to use. He dropped out of college.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/06/25 04:07 PM
6	Historically, the average dude likely never found academics easy Grade school isn't the same as 'elite academia,' and has been progressively simplified to accommodate average students. People have raised valid concerns about how the school environment can be inimical to boys and their natural behaviour, and most teachers are women who will find it difficult to understand what's wrong. You're assuming that the public school system is primarily about identifying members of an 'intellectual elite,' when that's simply not how it's designed and education is no lon…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/06/25 03:59 PM
15	Women's advice to men here is to keep them guessing, single, guilt tripped until they're so old they'll get creepshamed anyway A lot of the advice is basically counter-productive, and often ignores the complexity of behaviour in dating. Constantly cautioning men to not approach women, or focus on various forms of self-improvement, is often a distraction. Often, men are rewarded for being brash or confident, and that can include behaviour that can be labelled insensitive. Part of that is due to the expectations of men being confident, showing leadership and taking the initiative in the dating process, which is founded on…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/25 11:55 AM
7	Women and men behave exactly the same in dating, it’s just women get more opportunity to act cold and selfish so it’s thought to be “their nature” Is anybody claiming that it's necessarily a ruse? It's not surprising for a big businessman or monarch to be less humble than someone with low social status. That doesn't mean that either of them is putting on a self-conscious ruse or being ingenuine. Their mentality can be genuine and also a reflection of different circumstances.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/25 11:30 AM
8	Women and men behave exactly the same in dating, it’s just women get more opportunity to act cold and selfish so it’s thought to be “their nature” Lmao. The pandemic and rise of smartphones hasn't helped much with that, either.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/25 11:23 AM
15	Women and men behave exactly the same in dating, it’s just women get more opportunity to act cold and selfish so it’s thought to be “their nature” I feel this is misleading. While greater opportunity can influence female behaviour, it's still the case that both genders have evolved through millions of years of social and evolutionary pressure to behave differently and show different mating behaviour. The difference in male and female roles in mating is present in a large amount of species, not only in humans, and therefore portraying it as just universal 'human nature' is overstating the point. The difference isn't only biological or natur…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/25 11:17 AM
3	One of the biggest reasons for the discrepancy of sexualization and the argument over approach and effort is the 'education of sexiness'. Many men overlook this and simply believe women are genetically "blessed to be more attractive than men"; and that women put in no effort at all to make a move. Saying that magazines sell garbage? That's not even criticizing women, it's criticizing magazines for giving unrealistic or misleading advice. Surely it's not that controversial that magazines can give an unrealistic portrayal of reality.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/25 07:41 AM
2	One of the biggest reasons for the discrepancy of sexualization and the argument over approach and effort is the 'education of sexiness'. Many men overlook this and simply believe women are genetically "blessed to be more attractive than men"; and that women put in no effort at all to make a move. Absolutely. OP is ignoring that men have lower standards. Both women and gay men find sex more easily, despite the men not having the same upbringing. When women try to live up to male standards, often their idea of what's 'sexy' to men is completely warped. A lot of weird plastic surgery stands as a testament to this. However, men typically find women attractive more readily and with lower standards, regardless of her behavior. So even if a woman's attempts to be 'sexy' backfire and leave her l…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/25 07:33 AM
21	Do you guys think feminism still encourages male gender roles? Absolutely. Modern feminist culture takes male gender roles to extremes, for example by portraying men as caricatured hyper-masculine rapist animals worse than a bear. The same people who compare men to bears and scream #MeToo, are also reading romance novels with abusive, wealthy, domineering male leads (who are optionally werewolves), and hating on men who are under 6'0 and hence seen as 'less masculine.' The feminist treatment of male gender roles is two-faced. They claim to oppose it, but on…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	25/04/25 03:06 PM
1	Need Suggestions: Influencers for Young Men Exactly, influencers are ultimately making comtent for views from the lowest common denominator. The most healthy lesson young men can be taught is to not use influencers as role models.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/04/25 08:48 AM
26	do not know if this is written as good as some people might like but i put a lot of work into it and it is where i think male rights advocates often go wrong and how we are chancing losing the culture war if we go to far right or that is pretty much what it is. We should be understanding of the reasons why young men would be reluctant to support a mainstream left-wing that publically hates them. As such, I feel like politicizing the movement would be uncalled for, it's inevitable that many men who care about men's issues will instinctively shy away from left-wing politics. However, I feel like a large part of modern men's issues revolves around economic woes, which makes things like relationships more difficult than it was for the boomers. This also ma…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/04/25 08:40 AM
2	Right-wingers from the fringe to Fox News are rolling out a new argument in favor of Trump’s tariffs—that they will help boost America’s masculinity. *Jessie	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/04/25 06:34 AM
100	feminists can't claim feminism is about equality and not also advocate for equality for men. Modern feminists who say that feminism is about equality for men are often just trying to get men to stop complaining and fall in line. In practice, men's issues are generally downplayed or treated as farcical. It's like politicians who say they're there to look after the national interests and the poor, but in practice they'll only look out for themselves and their rich donors.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/04/25 06:04 PM
-3	If women are allowed to hide their plastic surgery from men in the early stages of the relationship, then men who are dating casually should also be allowed to hide their dating intentions in the early stages. Either way, people will condemn the man while defending the woman's right to lie about it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/04/25 09:38 PM
2	If you're 'lonely' purely due to a lack of sex, you're not 'lonely', you're just horny. 'Lack of sex' is an oversimplification. A lack of romantic relationships or the opportunity to build a family is a problem for men, and an ordinary romantic relationship is also a sexual one. Secondly, humans are evolutionarily programmed to seek sex and procreate, so obviously that can play an important role in people's emotions and motivations. That's a natural part of romantic relationships and a part of what humans seek for fulfillment. Shaming men for wanting sex is common, but it's ultimat…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/04/25 09:03 PM
4	Let's be clear about Jordan Peterson ... Yes, sadly, I think he had a mental breakdown over mean Tweets and has never been the same since. He is far gone, far gone. He probably just paces around his room now, delivering Hamletian soliloquys about lobsters.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	06/04/25 04:46 PM
10	How do you respond to "men will only listen to other men"? Exactly. This belief just shows their siege mentality. They view men as a conspiratorial group, who spur each other on to misogyny but won't listen to women. Most men aren't that strict. But they've bought into that mentality, and you can't convince them to change it just by showing them the facts.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	06/04/25 04:36 PM
20	Ley Alina and Bagkok Rules: Licence to Kill for Women Women are seen as victims, and men are seen as perpetrators. So people will respond more sympathetically to women who claim victimhood, but with men it's not taken as seriously.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	06/04/25 04:32 PM
1	“Decentering” is really just “centering” resentment of the other gender 'Decentering' just means that, if your focus on women or relationships is having a negative effect on your mindset, life or mental health, then you should cut it out. If you enjoy a woman's company, then you have no motivation to stop. But when, for example with some incels, thinking about women and relationships is causing you serious despair and negativity, then it can be better to care less about them. They shouldn't be central enough to your life that your mood and feelings depend on them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 10:45 PM
6	Q4M: Why don't you rely on other people's opinions more when dating? Yeah, it's brave of OP to assume that a male stalker app that shares women's private information wouldn't be banned in minutes.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 10:33 PM
4	Q4M: Why don't you rely on other people's opinions more when dating? Are you really asking why men don't base their dating life on the opinion of random strangers on the internet? For what it's worth, men don't typically find dates as easily as women, and have to put in more effort to get them. So obviously they're not going to take serious decisions based on some anonymous internet strangers. If you can easily replace one partner with another, as many women can, then you might be more open to that. But that's not the case for most men, so there's not a lot of de…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 10:20 PM
1	Women using dating apps as a marking strategy is pretty clever. Nah, it's not some clever strategy. It's just the same thing that spam e-mails have done for decades. Using a platform to spam links in order to get a few hits or money. Spam e-mails can work, but they're not some deep strategy and are often written in the most corny, low-brow way possible because the people interested in them aren't generally the brightest anyway. Sometimes the OF advertisers aren't even real women, and are just scammers. Besides, as other commenters have said, the vast majorit…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/25 12:21 PM
5	The plight of boys and men, once sidelined by Democrats, is now a priority The Democrats will claim to 'support men' for votes, but won't apologize for or disavow years of anti-male rhetoric and a society which undermines men. They'll claim to oppose capitalist excess, but won't oppose the capitalist system or make any serious attempts to change it. They'll claim to oppose war, then get involved in all kinds of wars while spewing war hawk jingoism about Palestine, Russia, Iran, and whoever else is a current enemy du jour. They'll claim to oppose Israel's crimes, but wi…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	02/04/25 12:34 AM
76	What do we think of Starmer asking for adolescence to be shown in schools? This is just ignorant. 'Adolescence' is an alarmist film made for easily-worried parents, which paints their teenage sons as a threat that has to be monitored and reined in at all times. It's just another show which stigmatizes young men. Why would you show that to teenage boys? Do you really have to let them know how much you think they're dangerous and bad? What next, give them a course on man vs. bear and the SCUM manifesto too? It's like giving kids a Satanic Panic class showing them an alar…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	02/04/25 12:23 AM
3	"just be confident" is a shallow advice for men That's basically true. People who have more reason for confidence will get more as well. But, to be fair, lots of boys might have grown up fairly confident, and had that trained out of them by an education system and society that treats ordinary male behaviour as problematic. How the genders express themselves is typically different, and so are the reactions. When girls are confident, people may encourage them, but guys can easily be demonized as unruly, rude and not obedient enough for authorit…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 12:41 PM
2	"just be confident" is a shallow advice for men It's like a man in a fursuit. If people just think it's a doggy, then they might like it because people like cute dogs. Like the Japanese guy with the $15,700 dog suit that he can hide in. But if people see the man inside, then they'll think it's a furry and freak out. If you try to be confident, then you'll look more successful and like you live a happier life. If you act animated, over-the-top and enthusiastic, then you'll look like your life is an adventure that others might want to get invol…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 12:01 PM
2	"just be confident" is a shallow advice for men Gender roles. Males are expected to be confident and assertive, and initiate. Lots of women also want boyfriends who are tall and make them feel small, or who are more successful than them, and a lot of romance novels for women involve male protagonists who are caricatures of masculinity that will abuse the female lead and then turn into a werewolf. Women expect that of men because it's the gender role associated with masculinity. They are often quite strict about this, and a lot of machismo and…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 11:45 AM
4	"just be confident" is a shallow advice for men Women also generally prefer men who have lots of female attention, high social status, or are very successful. 'Confidence' is valued in large part because it's assumed that it comes from a history of being treated well, successful, having experience with women, etc. It's a sign that's usually associated with traits that women value. People treat it as an independent thing, but that's misleading. Since it's seen as a sign of success and status, people who imitate it can come across as if they …	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 11:23 AM
23	Using “incel” as an insult is immoral and obnoxious. It's a form of virgin-shaming, something which girls have done for decades. Only now it has a 'progressive' veneer, and people pretend that it's about political views and 'misogyny.' However, the common use of the word as an insult is obviously because of its connotations of being a virgin. The claim that it's purely about viewpoints is gaslighting, and it's common on Reddit because terminally online users think that everything is about Reddit-tier politics. But really, everyone understands that…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/03/25 12:51 AM
18	This vaush video completely contradicts every single thing he recently says regarding the man vs bear discourse The capitalist system oppresses everyone in favour of capital's self-expansion, humans are secondary to impersonal systemic forces like money and capital. It forms an impersonal system which keeps itself going through exploiting humans. So playing Oppression Olympics and vilifying men is definitely besides the point. Painting men as the 'oppressor' is ignoring that most men simply don't have much power, and still struggle in their everyday living. Academics might be able to focus on microaggress…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/03/25 12:35 AM
28	Much like how Sarah Everard was the "perfect" crime for feminists to capitalize on when it comes to women's safety in public, what would be the equivalent for anti-misandrists along the lines of men being falsely accused or misinterpreted? Realistically, there isn't one for false accusations. By the time that a false accusation becomes national news, the #BelieveAllWomen crowd have usually already demonized the alleged perp as a rapist monster. Once he's been defamed and painted as a rapist, his image is already tarnished even if he gets let off. People are already emotional about the case and view him as a villain. In many cases, like Johnny Depp or Ched Evans, people will still hold it against him even after he's a free man. The…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/03/25 12:17 AM
3	On "Adolescence" Many incels dislike Elliot Rodger now, and claim he's not a real incel because he looks better than them. A lot of that probably comes from jealousy, because he received a lot of publicity and adulation, and incels don't identify with that. Andrew Tate is even less likely to be accepted there, because he's had sex and is a well-known online influencer. The incel forum communities are a bit of bogeyman like Andrew Tate, they're actually very marginal and have few members. By now, as the other com…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/03/25 10:09 AM
11	On "Adolescence" They also over-estimate how seriously boys take Tate. He's usually treated as a bit of a meme, because his larger-than-life public persona is blatantly ridiculous but he plays it up in a way which is found comical. A bit like kids who enjoyed WWE wrestlers like Cena or Hogan back in the day. It's entertainment. Also because Tate is found offensive by adults, which makes him appeal to teens. The people who legitimately subscribe to Tate's beliefs and his Hustler U grift are generally a small, aty…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/03/25 09:54 AM
33	On "Adolescence" He's a convenient scapegoat. Instead of acknowledging that young men are growing cynical about the modern left, it's easier to just blame it on Andrew Tate. Instead of introspecting about how hating young men will drive them to the right, it's easier to come up with a bogeyman who did it. Instead of taking accountability for alienating men, it has always been easier to just claim that they were misled by violent video games, Satanic cults or sinister men on the internet. Shows like Adolescence a…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/03/25 09:33 AM
9	Racial and Gender Stereotypes: How White Women Perpetuate Divisions Between Brown Men and Women You're right, forms of racism which are perpetrated by women can go unchecked in the modern day. Feminism has been used as a tool by TPTB to justify wars against the Middle East, as well as to back up racism against Asians. The elite have turned feminism into a weapon to divide people. Believing in women's rights has been twisted into believing that women's decisions and prejudices can't be questioned. If the Emmett Till case happened today, he would still be vilified.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/03/25 09:12 PM
12	An actual good video about masculinity. Absolutely. Trying to repackage traditional, patriarchal forms of 'masculinity' into a 'positive masculinity' comes across as farcical and unnatural. This repackaged, feminist 'masculinity' typically expects and demands a lot of men, but offers them very little upside. If leftists offered young men freedom from gender roles and the social expectations which accompany them, then it might actually resonate. But that would distract from hating men, so among many leftists it won't get traction. The …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/03/25 08:59 PM
–	Has anyone else found that Right Wing Man/Left Wing Woman pairings seem more common than the reverse? <image> It's a well-known phenomenon.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/03/25 06:36 PM
12	Male friendly reviews on Netflix's show Adolescence That's basically accurate. It's taking wider cultural issues, which are often economic or related to gang violence, and tries to use it to vilify disenfranchised young males and treat them as a perpetual threat. It's not much different to earlier, conservative propaganda targeted at concerned parents, which warned them that they have to monitor young boys to make sure they aren't privately listening to Satanic metal music, or playing violent video games which will turn them into shooters. People…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/03/25 11:58 AM
2	Dating Apps Will Never "Fix" Themselves—They’re Built to Make Sure Men Struggle That's over-simplifying. Realistically, dating apps were a response to a business opportunity, but they are also set up in a way which tries to extract as much money from users as possible. This can be to the detriment of users. Many products on the market can be unhealthy or function as a Skinner box in order to get more money out of users. That's what the OP probably means by 'built,' they are built in a way which can be inimical to users' relationship goals.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/03/25 11:36 AM
4	Why are there never forums of people trying to decode men in the same way people try and decode women Obviously, Reddit is misandry central.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/03/25 07:46 PM
12	To Women ,High Tier Men and Low Tier Men are 2 entirely Different Genders with Different Rules. <image> It's not just the media tbh. People claim that this stuff is only 'online,' but realistically it's everywhere and they just don't want to acknowledge the excesses of their own side.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/25 05:13 AM
5	To Women ,High Tier Men and Low Tier Men are 2 entirely Different Genders with Different Rules. They ignored the content of the post, and just replied because of how offended they are that someone was being sympathetic towards low-tier men. The OP went out of his way to stress that he wasn't just talking about lack of sex,, but the automatic response was 'nobody owes you sex, inkwells!' They're not replying to the post, they're just expressing their disgust towards low-tier males.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/25 05:06 AM
6	Do men understand how much women are influenced by the subconscious fear of men? 100%, you could replace 'men' in the OP with 'black men,' and it would still be basically the same thing. Plenty of racists would say the same thing about blacks or Arabs, it's textbook bigotry. People think that bigotry and misandry is fine, as long as you're on their side.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/03/25 04:42 AM
7	The best way to correct the dating market is for men to leave women alone. She's just trying to support misandry, ignore it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/03/25 07:03 PM
6	"If they're still single in their mid-30s there's a reason" - why is it OK for women to say this about men, but not the other way round? Feminists like to gaslight about this, but their talking-points are all myopic and have no understanding of men at all. Men find younger women more attractive, and obviously physical attraction is a significant part of relationships for most men and women. But feminists insist on making up artificial reasons for this preference, such as 'older women won't date them,' and 'they want to prey on and manipulate the woman.' This ignores male preference, and rephrases it all as a big conspiracy agains…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/03/25 07:04 PM
3	Most “I want a traditional woman” claims translate to “I want a woman who can rely on me so she won’t be able to leave” You said that the exception was for men who follow genuinely 'traditional' values. I think that a man can be attracted to a female gender role without subscribing to a whole lifestyle, just like women can read erotica about werewolves or want a dominant partner without going into the woods and turning Catholic. That doesn't suggest that it's a scheme to entrap women. People are allowed to want what they want. I think there are definitely trad LARPers among the most dedicated manosphere participa…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/02/25 10:20 PM
5	Even if the "nice guys" have hidden selfish motives, they are still infinitely better than the honest “bad boys”. That's just a part of pretty privilege and the halo effect. People will attribute positive traits to the men they find desirable, and claim that unattractive 'nice guys' are worse even if they're actually well-meaning. This kind of irrational assumption is at the basis of a lot of discussions of this issue. The claim that 'bad boys' are actually better is merely a rationalization of this attraction, just like the similar belief that 'He secretly has a heart of gold' and 'I can fix him.' Ultimate…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/02/25 10:04 PM
9	Most “I want a traditional woman” claims translate to “I want a woman who can rely on me so she won’t be able to leave” Women are allowed to desire men who fit traditional masculine gender roles, who are eg. tall, dominant and strong. But now you're psychoanalyzing males for wanting the same thing? Traits such as submissiveness and humility are a part of female gender roles, and men are allowed to want that just like women do. Women read books like 50 Shades of Grey which fetishize extreme examples of masculine gender roles. Men meekly dare to want a more traditional partnership, and get portrayed as monsters for…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/02/25 09:53 PM
4	The Blue Pill: A System is What it Does That's exactly correct. The redpill is just a counterweight to modern feminism, which has taught boys unnatural ways to behave. It works for normal guys, because it just reminds them of things that past generations would have taken for granted. Instead of being couched as a doctrine, it could also be rephrased as some simple truisms, eg. 'You don't have to always act nice to women, you can push back and let them earn compliments. Most women want a partner, not a simp.'	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/02/25 12:17 AM
2	I don't understand the obsession with the Just World Fallacy on this sub #BelieveAllWomen has evolved into Redditors thinking that women can never be flawed or inconsistent, and that anyone who suggests women might act like flawed humans is being misogynistic. Most people act on subconscious biases or instincts sometimes, and will rationalize their actions in ways which don't fully reflect the actual motivation. But somehow women are to be taken on their word whenever they talk about themselves, like some form of papal infallibility.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/01/25 09:24 AM
11	Q4Men: how would you feel if your wife made these typically “male” comments/ posts online? These aren't 'typically male'. They sound like average girls posting on TikTok.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/01/25 06:37 PM
–	“Women are wonderful” effect… There is no such thing as the "women are wonderful" effect. The WAW effect has been studied and demonstrated in practice, it doesn't matter what you think about 'collectivist thought' a priori. You're just letting your abstract viewpoints blind you to an obvious empirical truth.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/01/25 11:11 AM