TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Early-Possibility367 Archive

View 9 posts and 71 comments by Early-Possibility367 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

It’s not as big a deal since women have other options of BC, but yeah condoms are basic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 04:59 PM
-4

Insisting on non condom use is silly in general. However, it’s worse when women do it because men have more to lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:06 PM
-7

Trusting your partner is on birth control is like a lot of trust though, way more than be expected in an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:43 PM
-12

This is true, but doesn’t contradict my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:43 PM
-2

True. This is basically agreeing with my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:40 PM
-19

I’m talking about women who insist on their partner not using a condom, so saying “just use a condom” makes no sense here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:34 PM
-1

This is objectively true and I don’t think it’s that much of a hot topic. Barely debated. Even if they had the exact same romantic results, people who cared less would be happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 08:27 PM
1

I don’t think this happens to the degree people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 12:27 AM
7

Not really. I could flip it around and also ask how many women are genuinely ok being the provider in their relationship. Very few.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:21 PM
5

Sure, but you’re basically asking me to trust women’s mind read of men over what men actually say.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:18 PM
6

They can share what they think there experience is. That doesn’t make them right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:13 PM
-4

I think those studies were biased and had a specific conclusion in mind. If you go out looking for a peacock you’ll find a peacock eventually. I’ll say that monetary success is way less important to men after a certain floor than we make it to be. With intelligence, I think you have a half point but not as much as you think. Maybe with worldly wisdom and street smarts I could see envy take over men. I don’t think people would be intimidated by say a doctor or Google engineer who’s a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:13 PM
1

Is he homeless and/or living with parents? That’s going to be a dealbreaker even before the income is mentioned. I think after height, finances is the most common dealbreaker far and away. Women want their lifestyles supported so if you can’t support their lifestyle they don’t want you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:16 PM
3

I can't believe some people think looks are more important than height. Let's be real, c'mon now. How many women talk about "oh I can't date someone with a bad face." You barely hear it. You hear about height all the time. This is simple statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 06:06 PM
-1

I strongly doubt that. How many tinder profiles have height requirements versus how many of them have face requirements? It’s rather self explanatory no?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:18 PM
0

I think in general 6’2+ and having trouble means either very poor or hideous personality. It’s very hard to lose the auto attraction card being 6ft or more gives you looks wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:33 PM
2

There’s a 50/50 side of it to things as far as romance is concerned. You literally had another woman tell you that she believes short men are generally romantically invisible to women, not just herself but women overall. I think you’re underestimating the weight of that. Disgust is complex. I think there are a lot of people who have a repulsive reaction to someone of the opposite sex . Some don’t. We don’t know remotely enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:31 PM
3

I strongly doubt that he is overestimating his looks. At 6’4, he needs a monumental rounding error to be not tall. And 6’4 and beard is very much auto attraction category.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:22 PM
1

How so? What is your evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:40 AM
0

It’s been clear to me that the US has been matriarchal for at least a decade now. Ive been to tons of US cities and states and they’re all matriarchal in their own way. One thing that sticks out to me is how exceptionally matriarchal those places are. Women really are in complete control of the cities and the states there. Whatever women say goes in these places and more and men are kind of at the bottom of women’s proverbial feet being stepped on like a cockroach. I think OF is degrading and sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 02:44 AM
1

This is it. This is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:44 AM
1

True, but even after exclusivity, it’s unfair to ask the man to trust the woman’s birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 02:50 AM
3

This is the way. I feel like marriage is a good time to stop using condoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 02:49 AM
2

Exclusive is a very low bar for demanding your partner not use a condom. They’re literally the only temporary birth control the man has control over. Much better than trusting gf or fiance’s birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 02:48 AM
1

It’s better just like it is for us but certainly not at “I want to become a dad” level.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 02:46 AM
2

That’s true. It always feels like there’s an agenda with people going raw too soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:12 PM
0

I think that IRL, sexual compatibility isn’t seen as something massively important as it is on Reddit. As long as both partners genuinely care, most are not picky at all with sex stuff. This is an exception however, because what normally would be an incompatibility that could be worked through can now result in pregnancy and/or parenthood, and much less people are going to be chill with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:11 PM
3

I agree there’s a lot of psychological factors on the anti condom sides. I think this is a thing for both people from anti sex and pro sex households. For the former, it ends up being, well, I’m angry at my parents for teaching anti sex stuff so I’ll go all the way in a different direction. The kid from the pro sex household side is coming from a perspective of “well what if we push this a little bit more.”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:08 PM
2

I can see your perspective. A lot of it from the male perspective is wanting some control over the birth control process. There is some discomfort with the woman having essentially absolute power to make us dads or not and using a condom allows us to share some of this power. I wonder if I’d feel the same as a woman who could get a long term BC implant or something. But I don’t know how I’d feel there.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:03 PM
1

That’s a fair point. You can get out of the STD issue that way. Still, pregnancy would be the bigger issue. Without using condoms, you’re essentially placing both a massive burden but also a lot of trust with the woman. I’ll admit most of us are selfish and most pro condom men probably don’t want to place their chances of not being a dad on something they can’t verify. That being said, I think that there is some value to the former, that women shouldn’t be both the sole burden carriers and sole …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:01 PM
3

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:01 PM
1

I assume what you mean is that you personally wouldn’t take well to someone wanting to use a condom but you’re the outlier in your friend group. Ngl, it’s pretty funny that it comes up in IRL discussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:44 PM
1

Lmao we had the same question at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:37 PM
1

Yeah, but I think this also plays into why women in relationships become less keen on them. I think that a lot of times, if both are STD clean, and she’s on birth control then she starts to be way less keen on condoms. I think a lot of it is that the woman wants to be trusted that she’s serious about birth control and doesn’t want to feel like the man thinks she’s baby trapping, but it’s much better to reframe it as “look, neither of us can raise a child right now so let’s both protect ourselves…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:36 PM
0

What is VD?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:34 PM
4

Why are you making it about me when I didn’t make it about me? That’s an odd thing to do. But anyways, to answer your question, I feel like myself and most people irl probably act full blue pill in dating and most social settings and maybe purple pill in online settings. The more anonymous the forum is the ”redder” we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:29 PM
7

No one said the advice has to come from red pill influencers, just romantically successful men. If anything, it’s better to have the advice come from someone in your income bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 05:08 PM
1

Your first paragraph is true, but most people suggest taking advice from men who have what you want, not romantically unsuccessful men. This is the famous fisherman analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 04:47 PM
10

I see your point here. But also, the question is what’s the harm in venting about frustrations with rejection online. I agree that it’s better in person with irl friends but I don’t see how it’s necessarily a no no to use the internet instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 01:53 PM
2

Anger is absolutely not appropriated for man vs bear. Why are you justifying male anger? Why not explain instead of “shooting down”?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:59 PM
1

Appropriately reacted is doing a lot of heavy lifting. PLENTY of angry men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:54 PM
1

If men didn’t need to overreact to things like “man vs bear,” maybe we’d not make the mistake of overestimating how men react in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:51 PM
-2

I’d agree with you that there are many women who were already looking for something where people were not having sex or dating and they happened to find this movement in Korea. Its impact on Korea itself is debatable. Korea absolutely has lower birth rates by some distance, but it’s a debate over whether it’s the workaholic culture or women being afraid of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:45 PM
-1

This is the first comment I’ve seen where it says that men who want sex and can’t get it are not reacting. That demographic has always had a reputation for reacting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:43 PM
-5

The most reasonable response from men who oppose this movement is “thank you for taking yourself out of my dating pool.” It’s much better than the wild misandry accusations and the general incel anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:33 PM
1

So far comments like yours aren’t seem to disagreeing with me. They take issue with implied causation when I never weight one way or another on said causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 01:14 PM
1

I can't say I understand this response. All I said is that women don't like being approached for friendship. You're implying that I've implied this is women's fault when I didn't talk about fault in the OP at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 06:23 PM
2

I didn’t do anything. The post I referenced was of women who were clearly not open to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:54 PM
1

I don’t see how this is disagreement with the post? Your comment says many women have chosen not to be friends with men and I’m saying likewise.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:54 PM
0

I don’t understand what you’re saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:29 PM
1

How does that work when women like in the referenced post don’t want to be approached for a friendship?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:29 PM
1

I don’t see how this is relevant to my post. It seems most women dont want to be approached for friendship by men. I did not delve into the “why”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:28 PM
2

Fair enough. This was the exact sentiment on that post and does really prove my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:27 PM
1

It makes sense. In that same post, most women were clear that they only wanted to be approached for a friendship if the guy was gay, but there was a minority that would have said it’s fine if the guy is taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:26 PM
1

I don’t think I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:25 PM
2

Our points aren’t even contradictory. You’re saying that women are uncomfortable being approached for a friendship as stated in that post. A logical conclusion is that they aren’t interested in being approached for friendships. Notice I didn’t say women want absolutely 0 male friends, but in general, they don’t want to be approached for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:25 PM
1

I think if we’re at a place where you can have opposite sex friends but they need to do x, y, and z and meet only in x, y, and x situations, that we need to reconsider if men or women can be friends at all. If you had similar obstacles with other women being friends, you’d call off the friendship entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:22 PM
1

I mean it sounds like we agree. Do you just think I need an additional paragraph settling the blame, because I didn’t decide the blame one way or another. I just said women don’t want to do x and just left it there.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:19 PM
3

I think part of it also depends on how much work can you need to do and still have a friendship be plausible. If someone says “I can be friends with the opposite sex but there needs to be , y, and z,” then it is a pretty strong argument for not being able to be friends at all, unless x, y, and z are needed for everybody. It’s difficult to say men and women can be friends when there’s all this baggage like needs to be in a group setting and what not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:18 PM
3

I have noticed that the theater/art crowd is a lot of the exception to most societal gender rules. I also feel like most guys there rightfully or wrongfully are assumed to be gay or bi.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:15 PM
1

How so? I'm not seeing the contradiction. I'm assuming you think it's the "support" part that is contradictory as opposed to the believe part.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 02:28 PM
0

I mean, you can condemn her for anything. The question is whether we should.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 02:10 PM
1

I would fully believe and support my daughter but want any punishment that he gets to be with strong evidence. I will hate his guts regardless but I can hate someone and think they're entitled to fair due process. The reality is that DAs have decided that when it comes to crimes that are hard to prove, we must prosecute with much less evidence for these crimes, which is why we have a massive false accusation epidemic. There are middle ground solutions for cases where a rape is alleged but has po…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 01:48 PM
0

There is a difference between "nobody can force you to date someone" and "rejecting someone for any reason is fine." I think most people would say that you can reject someone for something that is likely to affect you in a relationship and it's wrong to reject for something that doesn't affect the relationship. The best example is of dating someone of a specific race. For example, a man is visibly Indian and gets rejected by a woman who understands that Indian parents tend to hold a strong disli…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 01:41 PM
1

The opposite isn't true. Attractive men who are evil still date easily. This test holds up for unattractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 12:23 PM
2

If you are working back from the conclusion, then inherently, there is no reason for anyone else to believe your conclusion. Also, the vast majority of relationships have these rules. Look at your friends. What would any of them say if their bf's wanted to go on a trip alone with a woman, or to like her bikini pic, or even gym pic?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 09:11 PM
2

The entire argument is that it's the differences between boundaries in opposite sex and same sex friendships that negates the ability to be opposite sex friends, not the boundaries themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:46 PM
1

These rules don't differ based on different genders. The no trips with just you two and liking Instagram pic rules are usually gender specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:43 PM
1

In cases where a partner catches someone liking a pic of someone of the opposite sex or hanging one on one with them, I've never seen "bisexual people exist" be a valid defense. The bisexual example is a case of working from the conclusion. People who use this example think that bisexual people existing necessitates that we must also accept opposite sex friendships between straight people of the opposite sex. There is no connection between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:41 PM
3

But what is the point of holding the position that people can be friends with the opposite sex, when the boundaries are inherently so different. Most people with your position would lose their minds if their partner liked a bikini pic/shirtless pic of the opposite sex or if they went on a trip with just them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:35 PM
1

There's a lot of problems with this response logically imo. First, these are not boundaries one chooses in a vacuum. People are pressured into such boundaries by society and their partners. Secondly, applying different boundaries based on gender does inherently mean that one can't be friends with whatever gender they have the most boundaries against. Because this isn't a boundary that's based on how long you've known someone or comfort level, but rather specifically an immutable characteristic, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter