TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EarthAllAlong Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by EarthAllAlong on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Exactly
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:42 PM
-18

Yeah, it is, but he’s not talking about that. He’s clearly talking about women ignoring him because he’s not rich/sexy/whatever
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:06 PM
-24

This is some incel bs
/r/MensRights27/01/19 04:46 PM
0

lol, ok. I read those comments and they didn't do anything but whine. "no equivalent for women!" as though that were some pre-requisite for the message to be worthwhile. IT'S NOT.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:51 PM
0

It's not a problem, though. Gilette makes products for men, not women--it would be a REAL bad look for them to come out telling women what to do, lol. And you know, there have been similar ads towards women--Dove's 'campaign for real beauty' comes to mind, trying to get women (not "FEMALES") to stop being superficial and idolizing one standard of beauty, or movies like Mean Girls which urge women not to be such catty bitches, or whatever. Just because X exists doesn't mean X's feminine counterpa…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:41 PM
-1

By virtue of the fact that these attitudes are ingrained in our societies and are only very very recently beginning to change after thousands of years sort of points to the fact that the message is worthwhile, though. Like, #notallmen, I got it. Absolutely. But if your male child cries at school, he will be bullied for it. That's still happening. So you can be all, "stop automatically assuming my son would bully another child for crying," or you can be like, "yeah. Bullying is a big problem stil…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:03 PM
0

Well I don’t enjoy coming out and ‘defending’ moralizing advertisements—they’re sleazy and always ring false because corporations exist to do one thing, suck your money out of you, and they wouldn’t be doing this if they didn’t think it was somehow profitable. But I just really think everyone here is over reacting. It’s reminding the vast majority of normal men that they have a choice in what definition of manhood they project to their kids. That is...exactly what the sub wants. They don’t want …
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:19 PM
2

I’ll be collecting my sorosbucks on the first of the month! No, get real. It wouldn’t be useful to send astrurfers here—there are no opinions to sway, just die hards who aren’t thinking critically. No I’m here on my own volition to call you all out on your overreaction.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:54 AM
3

It’s sad that you’re doing exactly what the ad asks you not to do. You’re lost
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:52 AM
-1

It wouldn’t bother me at all to see an add calling on women to be better role models. There would be no issue. Just like here.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:50 AM
-8

Except it doesn’t. It says “here are some negative things some men engage in. Don’t do that. You have the power to help shape the actions of future men so use that power responsibly.” And you guys throw a shitfit and refuse to engage with the work in good faith. Lol.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:24 AM
-22

I don't think this ad 'gushes with hatred and contempt for men.' Did you watch the same ad I did? It called out certain specific negative behaviors--it didn't say men as a group were bad. It's really disappointing that this sub has betrayed its utter lack of critical thinking skills.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:05 AM
30

I think you guys are really off-base here... I used to think that this subreddit was more level-headed than this... Seriously, the ad wasn't attacking men. It was attacking certain negative behaviors. How could you take it as an attack on all men? This is so disappointing.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:03 AM
4

Though the article doesn’t say, nearly half would seem to indicate pretty close to a 50/50 split. You’re extremely unlikely to get an actual 50/50 split so one sex is going to have more than the other. The problem isn’t the statistic (which is expectable), the problem is obviously the way the article chooses to portray the issue, as though female bystanders being shot is more dire than male bystanders being shot. Everyone in this thread quibbling over statistics is an idiot who has missed the po…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:36 PM
1

Well, I think it goes like this. All mansplaining is condescension, but not all condescension is mansplaining. Condescension is mansplaining when it's a man condescending to a woman in a sexist manner--particularly by explaining something to her that he assumes she doesn't understand specifically because she's a woman. That is what mansplaining is. It is not strictly condescension, but condescension from a man, to a woman, rooted in sexism against women. It's distinct from general condescension …
/r/MensRights08/07/17 04:08 AM
7

"BTFO" can you not? this isn't /r/the_donald
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:18 AM
1

Which is what the person in the OP was trying to point out--that although it's commonly used as a gender neutral term, in practice--that is, on google--it's male dominated. I mean, it's a completely stupid position to start a fight from, because it's ignoring just, well, reality, in favor of some theoretical utopia where for some reason there's zero distinction between men and women when the word "actor" is used. Which is just stupid to even wish for because having the flexibility of using gende…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 08:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter