TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EasternChildhood Archive

View 4 posts and 58 comments by EasternChildhood on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

As women continue to laugh and cry and screech like chimps over some poor bastard getting his penis chopped off, males continue to delve in subjects like astro-physics, and some of them are planning a trip to Mars. There will even be a few "affirmative action" females on board, including a teacher. Hopefully they won't screech in joy if one of the male astronauts gets his dick chopped off. Mars. You say.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:48 PM
5

Agreed. It was wrong of me and I mean that. Allies should only be used in the context of WWII armies. :)
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:47 PM
8

It's very clearly a hate sub. I mean, change the word "man" with "black person" or "jew" or indeed "woman" and it reads like a bad translation of Mein Kampf. There's actually a sub called "against hate subs"; it would be humorous to post material from TrollX, TwoX, MensLib, Feminism/ etc and see what happens. Unfortunately I don't have the spare time.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:46 PM
4

Women like to see men humiliated; if they didn't there wouldn't be constant male bashing ads. Women control the majority of consumer spending. Trust me: the ad wizards spent signifiant time on this, and they have concluded that women like to see men humiliated and degraded and reduced to the level of animals. Ideally, "men" would be reduced to pigs in a barn. Then the pig would transmogrify into a human male and fix your transmission or something. Then you would buy the relevant dish soap. Conve…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:32 PM
0

And yet, my own "dangerous thoughts" are being downvoted. Edit: and now upvoted? Faith in humanity restored? Edit 2: now being downvoted again by gynocentrist clowns (aka humans). Faith in humanity again plummets.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:39 PM
4

Are you suggesting that women have profound power outside of the law? And always have? That's a pretty controversial suggestion, my friend.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:28 PM
2

Credit where it's due: Betsy DeVos did the right thing and her repeal of "dear colleague" must have produced a massive sigh of relief among male college students. But let's be honest here: that was a stop gap against one deranged (albeit significant) feminist policy. The other ten thousand deranged feminist policies remain in place -- often with the complicity of Republicans. To cite one example, Florida Governor Rick Scott nixed shared parenting legislation after NOW lobbied his sorry ass. Both…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:51 PM
1

No it was satirical.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:53 PM
53

All the better. Without female allies we're going nowhere.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:40 PM
55

Men are waking the fuck up and it's glorious.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:06 PM
-2

Sorry, but length of time spent with a baby is no excuse for murder. This is classic toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:04 PM
9

I remember a post from this sub where a guy made a feminist-style graphic to highlight the absurdity of blaming all men for rape: "teach women not to throw their babies in dumpsters."
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:01 PM
2

Sure, I agree. But if the laws become fair, I see no reason why not. Edit: drunk.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:36 AM
2

And if they support us out of self-interest, its even worse than them working against us. I don't agree. Every creature capable of self-reflection engages in a cost/benefit analysis for survival purposes. Women are apparently naturally more selfish; but this may be because they have to have children. I think we can work it out. But that will require more courage from men, and more sympathy from women.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:22 AM
1

I can't believe this post was downvoted. Give me a non-cuck and upvote, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:05 AM
0

Can we not agree that cats don't give a shit either way? And will simply "move on" if you don't feed them?
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:38 AM
4

Sorry to break this to you, but kids can be hurt even in cold weather like conditions. The father didn't push his kids into the path, they ran toward it; he responded.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:29 AM
3

kids are indestructible Retard. Detected.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:26 AM
1

Jews. Well, in the case of MGM at least, I think you're probably right.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:19 AM
2

Republicans don't do jack shit for men's rights. They don't even have the balls to stand up to feminists.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:49 AM
2

Can we mutilate little girls too? I'm anxiously awaiting the decision of those clowns.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:25 AM
5

Heh. According to that logic every [straight] man is a gynocentrist!
/r/MensRights21/02/18 02:00 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7ywy96/slavoj_zizek_to_debate_jordan_peterson/ A debate with Paul Elam -- or Karen Straughan if she wasn't such a sycophant -- would be better. Come to think of it, David Benetar or Paul Nathanson -- that would be awesome.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:57 AM
3

Eh, it's far more harsh toward men's rights than women's rights. You're just a gynocentrist.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:56 AM
26

Toxic masculinity on display here. The father didn't ask permission before he lifted that kid by his pamps. That's classic patriarchal dominance.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:46 AM
2

Indeed.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:13 PM
1

No it's pertinent. It's at least as pertinent as LaTeesha going buck 'while around 'tound to fuck some other child abuser. You should be the first to recognize that this wasn't actually a critique of your post. It was a celebration.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:10 PM
2

Too dumb to reply to? Check. Bye.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:40 PM
9

Um, that's because if mensrights linked to menslib the number of bannings would crash the system. People who speak ill of feminism on menslib are immediately banned, even if they are rape victims.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:40 PM
4

men commit a vast majority of harm against other human beings. lol okay. Well if men are behaving so badly after being raised primarily by women perhaps it's time to support father's rights.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:56 PM
3

Don't link to wiikipedia if you want to remain credible. Wolmen are seldom punished for their crimes. They are essentially treated like children by the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:55 PM
3

There is no contradiction there skippy. Mothers commit the majority of child abuse.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:54 PM
19

Honestly, that's pretty weak criticism. It's an accurate description of their sub. you have to give credit where credit is due: this is a good post on their part. I agree it's a good post.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:21 PM
4

You edited your post. and i don't know the answer why women don't risk themselves in a crisis as often, often times a result of men going on some sort of killing rampage. No, not "oftentimes." Killing sprees are exceedingly rare. When a man risks his life to safe others -- oftentimes women and children -- it's usually during a natural or manmade disaster. sure, it's a bizarre claim, but men commit a vast majority of violence, across culture. That's a claim i don't need to present evidence for as…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:19 PM
3

http://archive.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm07/cm07.pdf Nearly 39 percent (38.7%) of victims were maltreated by their mother acting alone (figure 3–6). Nearly 18 percent (17.9%) of victims were maltreated by their father acting alone. Nearly 17 percent (16.8%) were maltreated by both parents. Additionally there is a large difference between father + other (0.9%) and mother + other (5.7%) (boyfriend). In future you may just want to search a few keywords on this sub.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:14 PM
15

True, but with a few exceptions it's not men complaining about sexual harassment. There's no excuse for actual harassment I'm sure we all agree; the problem is that a lot of these claims simply amount to a come-on in the workplace (by the wrong guy). I think the argument is that if you are going to invite sexual attention, you shouldn't act outraged when you receive it. At the very least you shouldn't try to get the guy fired or destroy his life. Be assertive, act like an adult and say no if you…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:09 PM
28

Within the next five years. The genie's out of the bottle. Feminists are currently in the bargaining stage: "we don't hate men and boys, we actually want to help them!" (overcome their toxic masculinity). As that link demonstrates, males fare significantly worse on most quality of life indicators (including the act of staying alive in the first place). This is true globally. In the West, females have more rights than males, and in fact almost all gender based discrimination is targeted at males.…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:02 PM
37

MensLib is a rat's nest full of self-hating weirdos. I'm surprised they take issue with this law.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:47 PM
11

do they? that's a presumption. Biological mothers commit the majority of child abuse, followed by non-biological fathers with whom they choose to cohabitate. Biological fathers commit the least amount of child abuse. Mothers also commit the majority of infanticides. Boys are abused significantly more often than girls, both by men and women. But let's face it, most violence is committed by men No. The majority of homicides are committed by men. Women are equally violent. They are more likely to h…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:40 PM
16

Why don't women risk their lives to save others during moments of crisis? Edit: Also, why do women commit the majority of child abuse? And abuse boys more often girls? Are you aware of the causal link between child abuse and adult violence? Interesting questions all ;)
/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:27 PM
4

Peterson's just a tradcon. There is nothing new about telling men to man up, "clean their room" and take responsibility. What would be truly innovative would be telling women to do the same. Any discussion of men in modern society that doesn't acknowledge the profound discrimination they face is useless. You're just telling them to be cannon fodder for a lost cause. Structural and legal changes are required, not just endless self-sacrifice.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:21 PM
2

it ain't LaTeesha shootin' up the hood No. But it's LaTeesha hitting her son and denying him contact with his father.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:43 AM
19

Your tax dollars at work, fellow Canucks.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:41 AM
5

This is why it's not only unjust but cruel to discriminate against men in the workplace. Women are valued simply for existing.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:12 AM
20

Male privilege?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:05 AM
11

FGM is vastly worse than male circumcision. Nah. One could actually argue that MGM is vastly worse since boys sometimes die from the procedure.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:00 AM
1

It's not turning out very well, so far.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:57 PM
5

I agree. My point was that the cake baking thing is sort of a dumb thing for gays to get upset about at this point, considering that nine out of ten bakeries will probably bake a gay wedding duo a cake with no objections. You'd probably have to do significant research to find out which bakery (if any) in your local area would refuse. This hardly compares to Jim crow laws, even if there are are significant constitutional issues involved. Conversely, if you want to find a baby boy being mutilated …
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:34 PM
7

It's a more complicated question than it first appears. But in terms of utility, the "cake baking" thing seems silly at this point. For every one bakery that will deny a gay couple a cake there are probably a thousand that will do so. In any case I think we can agree that anybody who wants to mutilate a baby should be prevented from doing so. Hundreds (perhaps thousands? It's difficult to find statistics on the matter) of boys actually die from MGM every year, especially in Africa. And even if t…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:18 PM
2

No. The women were only rejected maybe once or twice before a guy said yes, and some women weren't rejected at all. Come to think of it the whole thing was probably staged, it was a reality TV show after all.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:53 PM
1

Government quickly learned after women's suffrage that it can take more taxes (paid by men) to provide more social services (mostly going to women) to buy votes and increase government power. This is a misreading of how state power has grown in Western quasi-democracies. In the US for example, expansions in regulatory power (including the income tax) occurred prior to female suffrage when corporations began to grow more powerful than the state itself. There were lively socialist and anarchist mo…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:40 PM
2

I don't agree with the title nor the title of the documentary. It should read the more choice women have. "Equality" has nothing to do with it. Men's rights movements are sorely needed in the Scandinavian nations.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:43 PM
1

Warren Farrell used to do this in his seminars. He asked the men to role play as women and they did; then when it came time to for the women to role play as men they would all leave lol. I saw a relevant reality TV show episode a few years ago. The women were forced to role play as men and buy men at a bar a drink. Several were rejected. One woman said "this is the worst day of my life." Puts things in perspective.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:36 PM
11

Sorry, but this endless hatred directed at men and boys has gone on long enough. We're putting our foot down. You're free to join us or you can keep making excuses for feminism: the gender equivalent of the KKK.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:13 PM
5

Not if we acknowledge general differences between the sexes while allowing for outliers, and not if we acknowledge historical (and current) female institutional privilege. The argument I've heard against this is that women have shown over and over again that they lack sufficient empathy toward men, and that they are allergic to responsibility. Well, if that's true in a biological sense then we're more or less fucked either way. You would have to have a series of far right wing coups across the w…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:56 PM
4

There's a gay academic in Canada named Paul Nathanson who specializes in misandry (along with his co-author Catherine Young he has written five books on the topic). He actually opposes gay and lesbian adoption, mostly due to the horrible statistics about children raised without fathers, but also because he doesn't think we should be using children as guinea pigs in a social experiment. One could argue conversely that if the parents are loving the children are still better off than they would be …
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:39 PM
8

I won't be supporting Trump any time soon. The current left may have lost its collective mind but that doesn't mean I have to follow suit and support crazies on the right instead.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:18 PM
44

The entire political "left" in the Western world comes to mind. I'm not sure the designation "leftist" even make sense any more, since SJW's have very little in common with the traditional left as it existed in the west. The traditional left defended civil liberties including freedom of speech, opposed imperialistic wars, and focussed mostly on class issues. To the extent that they focussed on race and sex they tried to overcome such issues in the name of equal treatment. The first major labor u…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter