TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Easy-Protection983 Archive

View 0 posts and 116 comments by Easy-Protection983 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes, men utilised the one power they had and voted for an anti-woman candidate. Aren't you worried the west will follow, considering the rise of the far right? Maybe we should focus on mens issues and not pretend that shitting on men all the time will have no political consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:39 PM
1

The same physical and mental flaws. Men are much more forgiving of women than vice versa. One of the biggest things is the ability to meet gender expectations. A masculine acting woman will be attractive to a significant portion of men, whilst a feminine, unmasculine guy will not be attractive to pretty much 99% of women, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:35 PM
–

It is actually a competition for public attention. People can only pay attention so much to contemporary movements. More attention to feminism means less attention to movements about mens rights. Not only that, a successful movement requires the efforts of both men and women. A lot of men historically and currently support and are activists for feminism, but pretty much no women are interested in helping with mens rights movements. So they're dead on the water from the very beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:32 PM
3

Queer doesn't mean asexual lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:38 PM
1

There's nothing you can do except not lie about the true state of things. When you're enjoying being loved and happy in old age, accept that many of your male equivalents will be living miserable loveless lives. You don't even have to care, but the only thing you can do is not lie about how men have it harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:35 PM
1

It's because people are inherently wired to dislike unfairness. So rather than accept a woman with the same flaws as them will never date them or see them as worthy of giving a shit about will still be that sane way in her older years, they fantasize about them being in the same position that they are. To live in the same misery that they will and have always lived in is a form of revenge. But life isn't fair, that won't happen, and they will live miserable loveless lives until they are dead and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:32 PM
1

Yes, low value men need to understand that things don't get better for them, they're not going to be more accepted by women as they age in fact their prospects worsen. Neither men nor women care that they are unloved. Yes being unloved is a horrible fate but women don't give a shit, why would they when at every stage of life they have it easier than you. I think a lot of older men understand this, after all older single men are more likely to commit suicide than any other demographic by a consid…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:26 PM
1

This is true to some extent, the older women who I know struggle with dating and relationships are low n count women who never had many or any ltrs when younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:17 PM
1

If the world is 50/50 men and women, then yes, many struggle and get lonelier as they grow older unless they accept the men available to them. Same with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:15 PM
–

I literally don't give a shit about your personal experience, it's meaningless. I care about what the stats say about the most successful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:12 PM
–

Men funded and significantly assisted in women's rights movements. Without men they would have gotten nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:10 PM
–

Men commit suicide because they don't have girlfriends lol. Most men who commit suicide are single at an older age.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:09 PM
–

This is so simplistic that you've come to the wrong conclusion. Men didn't procreate through most of history because they were much more likely to die before they reached the age of having a child. That and a lot were legally slaves, female slaves were sexually controlled whilst male slaves largely couldn't breed. Most men who reached adulthood married and had a relationship, and throughout most of history where slavery didn't exist and men didn't die in bucketloads at a young age, most married …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:07 PM
–

Stop pretending that men aren't at a disadvantage in society, stop promoting feminism which takes away resources and attention away from mens issues for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:04 PM
1

He won because there's a massive incel/bitter men crisis in Korea, that bitterness was utilised effectively by the president for him to win the election, which was primarily run on a anti-feminist/anti-woman campaign. I'm not saying that's good, I'm just explaining the facts to you as they happened, I'm not making a normative statement on them. Most men have zero power in society, so no, they're not "society".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:54 AM
1

Sorry, but this is a very common view for men. Why do you think far right movements are predominantly single men left behind by society and not picked by women? Look at the demographic stats for the GOP, Reform UK, ADF, RN, etc, outside of very old people, young single men are their biggest demographic. Look at South Korea, the president literally won because he rallied against feminists and young women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:15 AM
3

It doesn't affect men women aren't attracted to because they aren't chosen for sex and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:12 AM
1

It's easier for a guy to get into a relationship than have casual sex. It's the opposite for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 08:47 PM
1

A lot of guys don't like casual sex, we only desire sex in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 08:45 PM
1

Well it's actually interesting because autistic girls have higher rates of both asexuality and hypersexuality, so that wouldn't surprise me at all. I also think asexual autistic girls are more likely to be sex-repulsed, which makes sense as to why they struggle to find a partner even if they're attractive as a vast majority of men want sex in a relationship. I do feel for them, but I don't think that it says much about dating for straight people, it's a different discussion entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 02:49 PM
2

You don't think equally men are settling? This could be my bias or due to where I live, but it's more common to see the woman being the more attractive partner in a relationship than it is a man. Of course, equally the man is more likely to earn more. Yet even despite this fact many men feel like they're settling. I personally think men are more hypergamous in looks than they like to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 07:36 PM
1

No, but his sexual response relies on how you look. And if men and women are 50/50 when it comes to the population, then statistically most women can't go for men more attractive than them, particularly as your average woman is more attractive than your average men. Not only that, statistically people undervalued their looks and overvalue their partners looks. Not saying you aren't dating a more attractive man, but unless polyamory becomes mainstream, you have to accept you're a lucky one and it…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 07:07 PM
1

But women are far less likely to be single than men and when single are more likely to have experience in loving relationships in the past. Men aren't lonely because they're single, they're lonely because they are touched starved, have no or little experience with physical intimacy, and haven't experienced love, one of if not the most powerful and beautiful feelings in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 06:07 PM
1

I agree with a lot of what you say but you can't really tell someone to be happy outside a relationship if you yourself have easy access to loving relationships and have had experience with love that they haven't. To many men never being loved means they can't ever be happy, no matter how much they try and cope. Being perpetually single and happy is incredibly rare, the only happy single people are those who could access love if they wanted and have been loved before.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 06:04 PM
1

I actually really respect people who are fully honest that they prefer to keep to themselves rather than get into a relationship. Why do you think women are less prone to this mindset than men? Considering women say they have stronger bonds with their friends, it always surprises me that they are far less likely to be single and when they are single they're single for a lot less time than men. This is why I struggle to believe that the woman has a more difficult time than a man in a relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 06:00 PM
1

Being "sex positive" doesn't mean wanting casual sex. Most women aren't into casual encounters and prefer sex in a monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 05:49 PM
1

It's important to men, too. But the amount of people we accept as attractive or nice people is much higher than women because we're far less shallow and judgemental, and more open to loving someone with flaws.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 05:47 PM
2

It's not a made up idea, a looksmatch is someone who has the same facial or bodily flaws you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 05:44 PM
1

Are you at least a 7?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 05:38 PM
2

The high percentage of autistic women is because autistic women are much more likely to be asexual, not because they literally can't get a relationship (or a sexual relationship at least).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 04:23 PM
3

Depends, you can not be fat and have an ugly body and face (No breasts/flat ass, ugly face, no form, etc). But it's quite rare for a woman to be skinny and ugly, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 04:22 PM
–

But your argument makes no sense when talking about long term relationships. Men and women are pretty much at an equal ratio demographically, so if we have two people who each want the same thing from each other, it doesn't make sense that one of them has much more value than the other. They aren't competing for the same resource, this is an exchange of resources between two groups of people with the same numbers demographically. So unless there's some explanation for that, your idea of applying…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 12:45 PM
2

I don't think it's anywhere near as harsh as how they treat autistic men. Did you find it difficult if not impossible to date men as an autistic lesbian yourself? If women were as judgemental towards autistic women as they were with men, you'd see otherwise average looking autistic lesbians struggling as male incels do to get a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 08:26 AM
–

Unfortunately some people just don't have the looks to date. Would you also say this to ugly women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 08:19 AM
1

I believe it's around 1.5x more likely but depends on the location, but I don't know how much of that is a cry for help, after all it's not like it's unknown for women to commit suicide more violently, just less common than men. So I'm not sure a woman who decides to hang herself and a woman who takes some pills have the same intentions in mind. It's not just about being single once but perpetual singledom and never being desired or loved romantically by someone you care about. Beyond base needs…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 09:20 PM
1

Even when including sexual assault and made to penetrate, women are still more likely to be victims of sexual violence. This is not true. And even where women are more likely it's by a incredibly small amount, with some studies indicating men might be even more likely to be victims. This thread has some great resources going into this: https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ocq8r9/some_sources_on_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys_part/ You also very explicitly said "rape culture" affe…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 04:35 PM
1

It's not true at all, men are almost as likely if not more likely to be sexually assaulted than women are when you consider coercion and being made to penetrate as rape. Men are more likely to be victims of crime than women, have more dangerous jobs, be homeless, and commit suicide than women, and are less likely to have a partner, more likely to be judged and rejected for not meeting gender norms by the opposite sex, and overall are more disadvantaged in life than women are (in the west). The i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:43 PM
1

It's not revisionism at all, I'd say that the work was pretty equal when it comes to men and women fighting for women's rights, considering most of their funding was from men. MRAs shit on feminists because feminists support ideas that are dangerous for men. Such as the idea that men oppress women, that rape culture primarily affects women, that domestic violence is a male problem, that women aren't attracted to hypermasculinity and socially punish men who aren't masculine, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:31 PM
1

No, I don't like it at all, and good for you if you do but many men dont and are socially punished for it. I don't want life to be a struggle where I spend most of my time trying to earn money to live, where I'm expected to be stoic all the time. I like being sensitive and soft, I love art and nature and animals more than I do competition and career ambition, I like supporting people emotionally and being warm with others. I don't want to be a body guard or a provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:11 PM
1

Women's rights movements received immense support and funding from men, men were the leaders of the movement in many cases. If any movement supporting men is to be successful women need to contribute and even push for change, just like men did for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:06 PM
1

Ascribing an individual solution to a collective problem is useless. Women's rights movements had specific goals in mind and received immense support and funding from men, otherwise they wouldn't have got anywhere. If anything is to change about the unfair expectations on men it requires a societal push and effort from men and women alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:04 PM
1

Personally I do believe both men and women choose abusers sometimes, and whilst we should be sympathetic, blind sympathy is worthless. I think people should take more responsibility for their decisions, man or woman, and accept that at least partially the fault lies with them for their choice of partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 11:29 AM
5

Unless you're an incel yourself, you shouldn't speak to how it can affect someone and how it affects their lives. Men who are perpetually single are far more likely to commit suicide for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 11:26 AM
3

This is so obviously bullshit because statistically speaking sexually successful men are more likely to hold misogynistic beliefs. "Gut feeling/creeped out" is almost always reserved for ugly and unattractive men. If an attractive man was doing the same thing, it'd be considered flirting. This is obviously not the case when it comes to the most severe forms of harassment but for most encounters it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 11:22 AM
1

These are bunk because they don't control for important aspects of men's work life, such as longer commutes and irregular overtime, men's household chores are also more irregular and difficult to track (DIY jobs that can take hours on the weekend but not worked on during the week), they also don't separate non-couples from couples which is what's in discussion here. There's more single moms than dads and many if them also work, I imagine this will affect the numbers quite heavily.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 11:04 AM
1

This is largely a bullshit excuse, statistically men work more hours in your average marriage than women when combining household tasks and paid labour.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 10:47 AM
1

This is largely a bullshit excuse, statistically men work more hours in your average marriage than women when combining household tasks and paid labour. It's a convenient excuse because a loss of attraction for women is not related to the morality of the situation, but to accept that is to accept that your partner is not at all at fault, which then places the blame on you as the reason for the breakup. So women make up this excuse to absolve themselves of blame and responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 10:46 AM
3

This is largely a bullshit excuse, statistically men work more hours in your average marriage than women when combining household tasks and paid labour. It's a convenient excuse because a loss of attraction for women is not related to the morality of the situation, but to accept that is to accept that your partner is not at all at fault, which then places the blame on you as the reason for the breakup. So women make up this excuse to absolve themselves of blame and responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 10:44 AM
1

I don't think this is true at all. Yes, women value emotional engagement, but emotional engagement alone will have no real value to them because it's so accessible to them. They value the story around that engagement more than the emotions themselves. It's why their fantasies are usually about transforming hypermasculine emotionally unavailable men into more emotional beings, without their inherent sex appeal being negated. There's millions of boring guys who engage emotionally with their partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 10:39 AM
1

Men work more hours on average overall than women when combining both household tasks, chores, and paid work. So the idea that it's because women have to "mother" their partner when, on average, that partner works more than they do, is bullshit. They might feel that way or say they do but it doesn't reflect reality. I think it's more simply because, in a long term relationship, a lot of natural resentment grows within women as their partners masculinity comes into question through various differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 10:31 AM
–

Even in the US a lot more prostitutes are trafficked or forced into it than you think. You can never be sure seeing someone if they've not been forced or trafficked. If you see a prostitute you have to accept that you could be raping somebody.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 10:14 AM
1

I don't know what you mean by "you people", I'm generally centre-left leaning at least economically. Despite trump being borderline special needs and attempting to overturn an election twice, he still won both the presidency, the House, and the Senate, and the GOP have made significant progress with weakening democratic institutions to make it easier for them to overturn elections in the future. And even without that the tea party wing have significantly expanded their influence from a niche win…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:55 PM
–

It's not conscious, no, but that's ultimately what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 10:34 AM
1

Look at the rate of relationships and companionships mid 20th century vs now for a comparison of how much it's dropped off. And I think the fact the the rate staying much higher than it is now despite all the rights women achieved shows that you don't need to remove rights directly to change things, you just need to make it harder financially to exist without cohabitation between two partners to influence things enough to make significant change.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:17 AM
–

Oh, when ? Pretty much every western country before the sexual revolution and after the industrial revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:52 AM
–

How so? Not succeeding doesn't mean you didn't work hard to try.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:51 AM
1

I accept that women can face dating challenges, I just don't accept that this is nearly at the level of men. The only women who have comparable difficulty to your average straight guy is lesbian women (or asexual women), who make up a minority of the population. However, I do agree that many men overestimate how easy relationships come for women because of how easy casual sex comes for 99.99% of straight women, but overall relationships still come much easier for women than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:48 AM
–

It's also a fact most men throughout history were completely miserable and died in abject poverty completely unfulfilled in anyway. Religious celibacy was an extreme minority of the population throughout history and largely consisted of the non-first born of the elite, and they were happier in comparison to the majority of the population because their base needs were fulfilled and they had access to the highest levels of education and likely led the most comfortable lives possible at the time. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:39 AM
–

Sorry, looking at the study I was referring to, most violence in relationships isn't reciprocal, it's around 50% so around half. However, when considering non-reciprocal violence, women are more likely to be the perpetrator than men, which proves my point more than I originally thought. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020?role=tab Women are more likely to receive greater injury than men from domestic violence, which makes sense considered the biological difference…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:33 AM
–

I disagree, I think men are willing to go through major hardship to get sex and companionship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:25 AM
–

It did in every situation in the past when the authoritarian right got into power. You underestimate the power of social stigma and financial incentives and expect the current zeitgeist to exist forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:24 AM
3

I'm mainly focusing on your last comment where you said men don't like it because they don't like women who have lots of sex, when high libido is largely associated with men, rightly or wrongly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:23 AM
–

Every time a guy appears as short online in places like TikTok, thousands of women make fun of him, many of which show a psychopathic lack of empathy whilst making fun of his suffering and often even making light of male suicide. That doesn't mean most women feel this way, only the loudest do. It's the same for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:22 AM
–

Men used to select women primarily by how they fulfil traditional gender roles, with more masculine women being largely ridiculed and avoided by men. Thanks to a major loosening of gender roles for women in the last 50 or so years, masculine women are now considered attractive partners, arguably they are more attractive to many men, with women with traditionally masculine outlooks and hobbies preferred over more feminine women. However, the same political and social movements never occured for m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:19 AM
1

It's very rare for women to not be able to get sex/relationships unless she has a significant physical defect or is a lesbian, so that would surprise me very much if true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:12 AM
5

Men hate women who act like men and women hate men who act like women, this has always been the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:52 PM
–

Hyper-masculine men are typically more aggressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:49 PM
–

It's not like it's going to revert to pre-industrial gender roles or that the Handmaiden's Tale will become reality, but things will definitely gradually worsen and policies designed to make it more difficult to live outside of a heterosexual cohabative relationship will make it so that we basically return to the gender dynamics of 70 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:48 PM
–

There's no way that, through force, women can reasonably defend themselves from men en masse. Even self defence classes for women teach this, and consider direct defence the last option when all other avenues have been explored. This is particularly the case for when state violence is the threat, not just some random guys. Not that I think it will come to that. The idea that some Handmaiden's Tale esque society will come into force with immediate affect is total fiction, things will probably jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:45 PM
–

I don't think most men get angry at that at all. Must be the company you choose to keep.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:39 PM
–

Arguably both, considering most violence against women in relationships is reciprocal. Of course this is not considering the strength differences between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:38 PM
–

It will be a very strong argument when the far right extend political control over the west and cement power into institutions that allows for them to make the changes they need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:36 PM
1

They can't get sex/relationships or they don't choose to pursue it right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:34 PM
–

They're attracted to those types of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:32 PM
–

There's no such thing as free choice. Everything down to the most minute aspects of your personality is determined by your genetics, your culture, and the way you were raised. You can't change genetics of course but you can change the rest, and that changes the choices that people make. If it's more difficult or a bigger social stigma to remain single, for example, more people will want relationships and would date and love people they otherwise wouldn't in a world where it's easier to remain si…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 10:41 AM
1

Because those men are hyper masculine and women are primarily attracted to a man's masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 10:33 AM
–

The dating market is almost identical to an capitalist economic market model in many ways and it is driven by the same principles of competition and commodification as product markets are. In the dating market, just like in free market systems, individuals are competing for limited resources and this alienates individuals from each other and promotes individual competition over mutuality. And as in free markets, where resources are unequally distributed by design, in the modern dating market aff…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:25 AM
–

This is talking about living arrangements, not relationship status. When we focus on relationship status the trend is absolutely downward, an increase on 3% referring only to residential cohabitation is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:14 AM
1

I don't blame you on an individual level, but I do think it's interesting that the more comfortable we get as a society the less we have children. Makes me wonder if times getting harder and culture reverting to being less progressive will actually increase the birth rate on a societal level.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:00 AM
1

If this policy was introduced immediately, I would agree with you, but cultural changes that make such policy possible will likely occur over a generation, at which time when such policies are enacted opposition will be much less and easier to control.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:51 AM
–

The sexual revolution introduced free market capitalism to the dating market which ultimately subjected people to new forms of competition, which created an excess of "losers" (a concept inherent in free markets which deal with winners and losers) that wouldn't have existed 70 years ago. The sexual revolution is a major part of the movement of extreme individualism which has gripped the west for the last few generations, resulting in increased alimentation, and a breakdown of communities and tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:49 AM
–

Men care and they vote. I don't think the far-right, which is growing in influence because of lonely/lost men, is going to be very kind to the unique protections women have thanks to modern society. Might be best to at least try to come up with a better solution now before people start coming up with more extreme solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:39 AM
1

I think you can equally say that people aren't entitled to specific partners whilst admitting that sex and companionship is a need and we should cultivate a society where the most amount of people can happily find a partner, rather than what you're doing which is to accept that men are increasingly suffering whilst women are increasingly enjoying an excess of sexual and romantic interest and saying "I don't care, keep suffering more and more every decade lol". The problem with your approach is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:36 AM
1

The sexual revolution, primarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:23 AM
1

I'm sure you're not, I'm just saying such a movement will likely not find it very difficult to steamroll over opposition over a long-term period. In the short-term it will be more difficult, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:21 AM
1

This is easily debunked by the fact that violent men are more successful with women than passive men. If personal safety was a major concern of women so many of them wouldn't pick for characteristics which increase their likelihood of being victims of violence from their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:59 AM
1

Then why do the riskier men succeed more than the less risky men? This is not about risk at all, violent misogynistic men do fine in dating/relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:57 AM
1

A government likely to enforce such social dynamics would be unlikely to allow protest without violent opposition. Most people pretend to be heroic political rebels but if the hippy culture has shown us anything it's that 95% of people will fall in line within a generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:47 AM
0

I think people adapt to their circumstances much better than you imagine. People in the 50s got into loving relationships with people they would never even think of getting with now. It would probably take a generation but changes to social dynamics would also change people's outlook on their partners and lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:45 AM
1

The problem is you can only say "deal with it" for so long until a unfortunate solution is forced upon you. The far right is becoming very successful among the west thanks to lonely men. Historically the far right have been awful for women's rights and have generally made things far worse for your average women once in power, to the benefit of men. We need to find some kind of solution before one is forced upon us, to expect that the current culture of gender egalitarianism will subsist despite …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:42 AM
1

Men face more violence than women and are more likely to be victims of most forms of violence than women are, statistically. The fact that you ignore the primary victims of violence to talk about women, who are a minority of the victims of violence, is a perfect example of men being ignored to uphold women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:35 AM
-1

Statistically, the most violent, masculine, misogynistic men are very sexually successful, more so than your average guy. Empathy isn't enough, women need to change the way they view and select men which requires a strong social movement pushed by women, similar to how men slowly changed the type of woman they were attracted to. Attraction isn't 100% biological, it is culturally relative. In the past masculine women were considered untouchable, now guys almost prefer women with masculine hobbies…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:30 AM
1

The trend is downward and we're reverting back to our old ways. For now the dating market is closest to free market capitalism, where a majority of women and a minority of men thrive and a majority of men suffer, but it could easily change with the political climate as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:24 AM
-3

But if you look at how this compares to 70 years ago you see where the trend is heading.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:22 AM
3

No, but if you're so sure, you'd at least have a few examples. You don't even have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:09 PM
0

People who have access to partners don't make it their identity, just as the owner of an house doesn't make his house an identity. But an homeless man is defined by his lack of shelter. People who can readily access romance cannot understand what a perpetual lack of companionship does to a person. It literally affects the chemical makeup of the brain, and perpetually single people are much more likely to die younger than someone who has access to romance in their lives. In fact lack of companion…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:36 PM
0

We're talking in terms of dating. Looks might affect both men and women outside of dating, but in dating, it affects men far more.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 03:13 PM
1

If you want sex/romantic intimacy and don't get it, you can't thrive. Can you name one person who desires sex and relationships, cannot get them, yet has thrived?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 03:11 PM
1

It's not your disagreement that makes you passive aggressive, it's how you say it. And how you keep saying "you think" when I'm talking about relationships I've had and I've informed you about only adds to that. Thanks for confirming. Best of luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 01:20 AM
1

You're very passive aggressive. I'm relying on the lived experiences of myself and other men in my situation. What did you want me to do, ask every woman interested in me to fill out a survey in case I had to show it to somebody who was arguing with me online?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 01:08 AM
1

As I said, despite being less attractive in every way except my income, I've had a lot more options as a guy in his late 20's/nearly 30 than when I was younger, when I was more attractive in almost every way. As such, the attention I have gotten can easily be inferred as being from people willing to settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:58 AM
1

It's not that I think that, people have expressed their willingness to settle for me. Men failing to get women in their youth but finding it much easier when they age despite being even less attractive of a partner is pretty much a rite of passage for sub-average men for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:39 AM
1

That's my point lol, and it proves your point wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:23 AM
1

I'm saying I'm someone unwilling to settle, but many people are and the fact I got more attention in my late 20s despite being uglier, less healthy, and less mentally secure proves this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:15 AM
–

I think the difference is men say it to joke around with their friends, usually before talking about how to change it. Women do it to harm the guy they're categorising as a virgin because to them it's an important value judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:12 AM
0

But it affects men more than women, which is the opposite of what feminists claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:05 AM
1

I am making the choice not to settle for my options, I've tried before but I broke it off because I realized I wasn't that interested and I didn't want to hurt her by leading her on. But that's not my point. I'm saying many do settle, and I'm proof of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:03 AM
1

I have no more life experience now than I did when I was in my early 20s. Alcoholism has made my face even more bloated, I have pretty much lost my definition and have become scrawny due to lack of eating and a stomach/esophagus issue I have. My mental health is worse, the only thing that has changed is that I now earn an average wage instead of being broke, but I don't advertise that. Yet despite this I have a lot more options, it's not because I'm more attractive because I'm objectively not, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:57 PM
1

Everyone you mentioned is attractive. I'm talking about guys like Michael Cera and Jonah Hill, most women find them ugly yet guys who look like that in real life and uglier usually end up in a relationship. Even the guy in the ugly truecel meme ended up in a relationship and he is of very low attractiveness. The maths doesn't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:38 PM
1

Yes, they do. Attractiveness is somewhat subjective but traits considered unattractive are generally agreed upon, most men that are considered ugly end up in a relationship yet most women agree that they are ugly. It's different for men because being an ugly woman is rarer but even then a majority of ugly women are in relationships too. The maths doesn't add up. Like me, I could never get a relationship when I was younger but now I'm in my late 20s I have some options, usually either plain fat w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:36 PM
1

Not everyone with an house is happy but you shouldn't say you don't need shelter to be happy when you live in a house to an homeless person
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:29 PM
2

But you have had relationships before and know you can in the future. The women who have never had relationships don't advise what you advise because they know what never having romantic intimacy does to a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:26 PM
0

You can live without shelter and human rights. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:23 PM
1

Most people settle, not when they're young but older. Women always say most men are ugly, but most men end up in relationships. Unless there's a huge cosmic coincidence that people who fulfil each others niches end up finding eachother, then many, man and woman, are settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:14 PM
1

Ok then, who is a man many or most women would not find attractive but you do? If it's different for every women you should have lots of examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:12 PM
1

They don't. If most women desire attractive men and most men aren't attractive, yet most women end up in monogamous relationships, that means that most women are settling on not getting what they want. Women are less likely to be single for long periods than men, if anything they're more likely to settle than be single than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter