Easy_Humor_7949 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Big Facts. This case is legal procedural nonsense. No one is advocating or codifying forcing people to pay child support to children that aren’t theirs. This single case is a complicated mess because this man had full custody of the child when it was born, had been paying child support since dissolution of the family, and only took a paternity test because he was trying to earn visitation rights! Why do you think this family court case became a headline? Men have fair rights under the law, your example is …	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 04:38 PM
1	Big Facts. A mother can choose to not be a parent to the child and face no financial responsibilities. No, she cannot. If she were to have a child and give up (or lose) parental rights to the father, she is then on the hook for child support. She can choose to terminate a pregnancy, because she has absolute rights over her own body. Have none of y'all ever been to family court?	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 04:16 PM
0	Big Facts. There is no "oppression" of men in this equation. You made that up. You are demanding a right to either coerce your partner into terminating a pregnancy or to wholesale abandon your family. The state can't force you to interact with and raise your child, it's giving you a "get out of parenthood free" card simply be paying a fee. That is an enormous right! You have the right to abandon your family simply by paying a sum that is proportional to your income. That is an immense amount of liberty.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 04:06 PM
1	Big Facts. You're conflating adoption and abandonment. Abandonment is illegal. You do have to pay.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 03:55 PM
1	Big Facts. No one is eroding women's rights. What matters is the choice that men SHOULD have but don't This trade off is definitionally an erosion of a woman's rights. A woman has complete and total say over her body, there is no tit for tat trade off in a man's responsibility to his children in order for her to have control over her body. It is a separate decision. A woman's choice to not carry a pregnancy to term, or not, in no way impacts a man's responsibility to his children. but if I don't want to be…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 03:29 PM
-3	Big Facts. why does he not have a choice to not be a parent to the child? Because it’s her body and he has already made his choice. I’m sorry that biology doesn’t grant absolutist rights to both parties, but this is straightforward. The woman gets to choose everything Obviously not, she can’t become pregnant alone. then he should also have a way out. He has a way out. He chose take not to take it at the time. Y’all are acting like “Knocked Up” is the norm, it is not. Contraceptives are overwhelmingly effec…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 03:00 PM
-8	Big Facts. If they both made the mistake of conceiving a child, then they both should have say in what happens to it. They both have a say. They can’t be absolutely equal says because it’s her body. That's the point of the post. It's not equal. It’s entirely fair. Do you think every woman who has an abortion tells the father to go fuck himself and does nothing to consider his feelings or the outlook of their potential family? Having sex with someone never gives you unilateral rights over their body. That’s…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 02:37 PM
-8	Big Facts. Women have the right to abort, Yes because it’s her body. child support Y’all realize this Tweet is factually incorrect and child support is never adjudicated to be 100% of the costs of raising a child? A woman can terminate because it’s 100% her body, a man knows as well as the woman the consequences of sex, so he may end up being responsible for half of raising a child. Why is this hard to understand?	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/20 02:24 PM