TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EclipseClemens Archive

View 1 post and 574 comments by EclipseClemens on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

The reason the test took 90 minutes to administer is because they objectively measured her response to 1000 questions such as: do you have a biological daughter? Have you ever spoken to Dr Phil? Were you born on Neptune? Would you describe blankets as sharp? They didn't just slap the shit on her and ask one question. They aren't foolproof, but that's why they gather 85 minutes of data on what a real yes and a real no look like.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:18 PM
37

What a valuable comment, and crystal clear constructive criticism. This sub totally appreciates your commentary-free rejection and gender based insult- completely devoid of argument or position. I really hope you felt superior to that sexist while unironically using gender ad-hominem. The two of your comments are just a perfect reflection of eachother.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:05 PM
0

Is your life so smeaningless that this is the best shit you could be doing? How sad.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/18 02:00 AM
3

Yeah actually you are. Flawless could be defined as without failing common sense or violating any laws. If you can't do that and still drive, I ready hope when such peopme kill themself in a car wreck my daughter isn't in the car they slam into. Those people are scum because they are intentionally putting others around risk of maiming or death.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/18 01:55 AM
1

And that is like, your opinion, man
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/17 01:47 AM
1

Hate SPEECH is not violence. Your ignorance of what constitutes violence cannot make your mental gymnastics show illegal nonviolence is violence. There is no nuance in what is and is not violence. It is a binary.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/17 12:29 AM
6

Words alone are not violence. None of your mental gymnastics can make nonviolence into violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/17 03:11 AM
57

I yell that terrorists are shooting in the lobby in a theatre during a packed disney movie from my seat. Twenty children are trampled and three watch their parents die as everyone flees in the dark toward the exit and the life is squeezed from the wounded on the ground. "It's just one lie!" Yeah words aren't just pressure waves in the air. Lies can be bad. Here is another bad one, "Mr. President! NORAD just confirmed we have 9 minutes before 300+ ICBMs begin striking the western seaboard, we mus…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 07:50 AM
39

The jurors refuse to convict if they can see it happening to them, yes. This creates a precedent which people can then use later in other trials.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:30 AM
20

Two guys out of thousands does not constitute the group being a nazi gathering. Gather 1000 people and chances are that SOMEONE in that group is an asshole. Grats, you found two actual examples. Show me 20 more. If you can't, your argument kind of sucks. If the whole group is nazi, find me 22 nazis. I can see two guys stretching with milk.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 07:06 AM
1

So then big men should not hit small men for the same reason. But we have no expectation of nonviolence if a small man hits a large man, even if the large man could trivially destroy the small man. In this case, it it clearly sexist to not hit women if you won't hit a weak man in the same situation, unless gender makes one of those groups better than the other somehow.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/17 12:37 AM
6

"Yes but Japan is the world capitol for virgins, and huge sections of their population consider any physical sexual interaction absolutely revolting. It's so widespread that, incredibly, they are running out of humans who will be physically capable of taking care of the amount of elderly people there are and are about to be. This is obviously because these women aren't sexy. They need cuuuùurves!" (This is sarcasm)
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/17 07:25 AM
4

All genital alterations to a minor that cannot consent, maybe, but why you gotta outlaw the cock and clit piercings of full grown adults?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:36 AM
7

The context of the word and it's history in a language has no impact on it's use? You're crazy or don't know much about language.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:18 AM
10

No you're disgusting because you are okay with cutting pieces off of babies you sick fuck.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 04:47 AM
2

My intent is to convey that she has been getting much worse press now, had a series of public political losses, and just approved pipelines. I feel like this will make a difference. I could be wrong though. I know we're gonna find out lol. I don't know what your local media talks about, but where I am, it looks like all the stuff about Christy Clark indicates she is on her way out.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:33 AM
2

It showed that people like me who were motivated to vote in the political climate during the last election were a minority.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:07 AM
2

I hate Christy Clark a lot more. BC resident here.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 10:30 PM
10

So, you're going to accept her words as completely true and unbiased? I took this as a case where nobody wants to be around such a person and she's rationalizing it. I definitely don't trust this proven fraud at her word. She falsely accused that guy and made shit up in her cv. Trusting her without any verification is a lapse of judgement..
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/16 02:48 AM
8

When you go and violate human rights, we can make these decisions easily. Sorry you weren't taught them. That you weren't was a violation of your human rights.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:20 PM
2

Because they won't be stabbed by a sharpened screwdriver.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/16 03:45 AM
1

Here in Canada, a Native walked up to a white person who she never met, declared "I hate white people," and punched her victim hard enough the woman lost a tooth and was knocked out. The woman who was victimized's last name was even "White". Declared to not be a hate crime by a judge. I simply don't believe the courts think it's possible for a white person to be a victim of hate crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/16 07:14 AM
41

Yet it is a financial contract
/r/MensRights07/11/16 04:47 PM
5

Being intended for something, and being off limits to something else are different things.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:12 AM
2

Which didn't happen. A short pepper spray burst is not everything that man had.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 08:06 AM
5

Women, being smaller, should never be treated any different than a man of the same size. If I, a 140 pound man, punch a 250 pound muscleman, I am going to expect retaliation, and rightfully so. Gender shouldn't be an issue.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 08:02 AM
-3

Achieve clitoral orgasm.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/16 03:23 AM
41

The challenge: become pregnant from this bag of semen.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/16 01:20 PM
3

Yep. No consideration is given to the men who she harmed. None whatsoever.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/16 10:35 PM
4

Punishing them would "dissuade real rape victims." So no. They never get prosecuted unless it's their 11th time, like that lady in the UK. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9894588/Compulsive-liar-jailed-after-11-false-rape-claims-in-decade.html
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/16 11:15 AM
-3

It was fake as fuck. Unconscious people don't keep their arms up to cushion their head hitting the ground. They go limp. Now, in extreme cases, you get the fencing reflex, but this was not that.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/16 03:17 AM
1

I feel like every swat raid is explicitly violent. Doors are blasted apart. Dogs are shot. Flashbangs go off in a crib next to a baby. Then they drag anything they find out and do a huge media pat on the back for the "12 pounds of drugs" that turn out to be just 3 trays of weed brownies. They get huge re-enforcement for use of violence, and are only reprimanded when they are caught on film being agregious. They can choke a man to death in broad daylight and get a paid vacation. If I work as a bu…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 07:39 PM
1

This is a false comparison. Of you train a person to fight and then pay him to go out and fight, you are the person who motivated the fight. The police are training cops as fighters. They are paying them to get into fights, among other things. Therefore the wrongdoing of the cops is motivated by the payroll of each cop. The department is ergo responsible.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:21 AM
0

"Thanks Obama" This is what you sound like.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:18 AM
4

Tattoos are not feminist in any way and have existed for thousands of years before feminism. Same with nose rings. You aren't making sense. Oetzi the ice man has tattoos. Was he a feminist? Because we found his prehistoric body in a glacier.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 09:43 PM
6

Everyone is laughing at you.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 09:19 PM
1

Looks better this time of year than when it is in winter and shrinkage sets in.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:13 AM
3

I wasn't there so I couldn't say for sure. As an atheist, I'd prefer it, but really, it was their last performance, whatever made them feel 1% better is fine.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/16 03:22 AM
4

Me too. It's the song they played as the titanic sunk.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/16 04:59 PM
3

No. You know nobody has gone to those locations and as such the only rational scientific position is that you can't know the effects on humans. You were being an ass not a scientist.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/16 07:37 AM
2

Nearer to god are thee.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/16 07:35 AM
3

If you have someone trespassing your property, you can use enough force to eject them as needed but no more. At least in Canada.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/16 10:13 PM
15

The cop says he was wrestling a criminal and so that's how we know it was right to wrestle that criminal. That is a textbook circular logic fallacy.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:51 PM
17

Circular logic again.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:17 PM
11

I haven't tried to justify anything. I just pointed out your circular logic. You may think I am someone else.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:16 PM
20

Circular logic. Cops say he is a criminal, and I trust cops over criminals. What if the cop murdered this guy and he is the criminal? See, you're not being rational. You can't trust the trigger was pulled correctly if you only ask the one who pulled it. I am not saying I know what happened but I do know that your reasoning is unsound.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:37 PM
26

This would be the same as removing the uturus, clitoris, vaginal canal, and the labia.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/16 09:34 PM
3

Thanks
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/16 07:05 AM
5

It isn't a word, it doesn't have any vowels. Mind enlightening me to the acronym?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/16 03:09 AM
27

Yes. That's how you get your contestants, offer to pay even if they lose.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/16 02:36 AM
8

I am so sorry that happened bro
/r/MensRights11/06/16 10:55 PM
1

What do we disagree on that is not opinion? Using the oft-forgotten Newton's Flaming Laser sword, there is no point in debating things that are not falsifiable because it's a waste of time. I mean, I love to debate reasonable people in a serious manner, but he was feeling pessimistic when he wrote, and I was high on some extacy. Naturally, we disagreed on the level of happiness definable from this anonymous internet story I can't prove wasn't made up. Like... I don't have much else to say, and I…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 04:00 AM
3

The huge, jagged cliffs of the tallest mountains are our judges, and the more of that inhospitable terrain there is, the more impressive the feat of scaling that mountain unaided. So yeah, this guy had to first metaphorically swim up out of the Marianas trench to get to summit Everest. That system is fucked, we agree there. Did the unreachable opaque blackness claim this man? Not a chance. He didn't have the luxury. There was someone who needed him. He was gonna win or find a different way to wi…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:48 PM
22

I am a father. That was a win. This man took the whole court system and society and said to their face I do not care about wealth, I don't know if my own flesh and blood sleeps in a bed most night and there are exactly 0 ways that I am gonna let that happen. Sometimes, when you lose everything you own, that is a win. I don't think there is any thing I wouldn't do to ensure my preschool age kid was safe and healthy. I would lie, steal, murder, doesn't matter. If you take my daughter, you have rip…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 09:32 PM
10

She took broken glass and thrust it at most of his sensory nerves and the majory arteries of the neck when he was even more defenceless than if he had been sleeping. Twice. This should be attempted murder 2.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 05:44 PM
1

"Which is actually every second of her life." Seeming as she wasn't raped
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:06 PM
0

You're larguing a point that matters less than nothing. It's completely wrong and moot. He touched her as a result of her actions, so that means it doesn't matter who touched who, because of who the source was. That was mentally deficient, too. I am embarrassed for you making a fool of yourself.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:26 AM
2

There's actually a lot of fun diving stuff around Okanagan Lake, including the anchors from the old floating bridge. The Ogopogo statue is about 10m down iirc
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 07:04 PM
2

Some really neat folklore too. Also, underwater statues of Ogopogo you can use scuba gear to dive to.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 06:19 PM
2

I live on the shores of okanagan lake! Didn't expect to see anyone talking about ogopogo on reddit today
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 05:36 PM
2

This is why you are being told you can't comprehend this argument. It's literally an argument you are losing about semantics, and now you complain he is arguing semantics. You're simply wrong, sir.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:32 PM
-10

This is a pretty white girl. You were thinking black man.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/16 05:48 PM
9

Cat penises have barbed spines. You wouldn't want to go down on them.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:42 AM
13

Learn what punches are. That was an open hand slap.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/16 02:08 AM
6

You are using your imagined sexism with only your opinion and anecdotal experience as evidence it can happen to cast aspersions of sexism on the contest in question. I consider that quite rude. However I am in a shitty mood and have probably been more rude than is fair and for that I apologize.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/16 05:38 AM
6

Good! Now you understand that girls had a private group fir a time but it was opened to boys, meaning girls were dominant. A group that attracts new male contestants after amassing female ones doesn't genderswap girls already there. You are ignoring that men don't "dominate" by losing 60% of the award placements. Stop trying to invent sexism where there is none. Next you gonna tell me it was sexist against girls to let them have the starting section before boys were allowed, and therefore more t…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/16 05:25 AM
6

It explicitly says they did not. It was for women and staffed by women in a setting for women but allowed men. It notes that 3 or the 4 runners up were girls too
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/16 05:15 AM
5

Yes, but that doesn't matter. All of these broad things act the same on this topic, here's a metaphor. You're saying my pants facts don't count because you are talking about capris. No, that's capri pants.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/16 04:50 AM
11

Yes. The s in stem. I know. Women still don't apply for the jobs in any real numbers... like men. Because it's the same thing. That's why it was grouped by feminist thinkers looking to reduce inequality. Because these areas are the same on this topic. Your point?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/16 04:31 AM
26

Women are 2.5 times more likely to be accepted in STEM fields than men. Women don't apply for it, and so men dominate tech. It's the same with garbage collecters too.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/16 04:25 AM
-1

If she beat the cancer, and the viet kong, that would be a case of "thistotallyhappenedforrealsies." I can't figure the motivator, but something is clouding your judgement, I think. This hypothetical woman got two PHDs (you can get honourary doctorates), cancer, marriage in the teens, bore 1 or more children, and was around in the same general geographies and time as Nazis. That sounds entirely plausible. In fact, I bet that describes thousands of women. This is a completely normal life by the d…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/16 03:50 PM
1

Troll'd shit. Ya got me. 4/10
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:53 AM
1

Well, my mobile version is showing a -23 comment that's deleted. This attitude is partially why you're getting this treatment. You're some kind of wierd oversensitive narcissist. I was just tryin to help your confused ass out.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:27 AM
3

You removed your original post, so sadly no. That was a really reasonable request though, I wanted to tell you but .. well to be honest I got baked and it's hours later.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:55 AM
3

He is right. You are so embarassing I am embarassed for you. You are the biggest cringe I have had this week.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:40 AM
3

That's one old school reference.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:01 PM
1

When they stop being a self reported feminist, stop getting accepted and venerated by feminism at large, stop the funding that goes to these same batshit crazy professors teaching this 1 in 6 are raped lie and the gender pay gap and all the other intermeshing, and sure. You go ahead and cause a schism in the ranks, because honestly, feminists fall all over themself to say they're moderate, but they support the sexism that is pushed. Safe spaces where you can eject someone on their skin gender or…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:25 PM
1

No idea sadly.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/15 04:05 AM
3

My daughter was very young and doesn't remember the things that happened, but she remembers how she felt and has a lot of anxiety any time my wife or I go away for longer than a few hours. It may have permanent harm on the one supposed to be protected. It's the lowest of the low to hit a parent in their kids.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 04:07 PM
11

My wife and I are pretty certain it was an ex-roomate we had a falling out with. He wasn't a good guy, had been to jail for assault while high off his ass. I believe they were made to a tip line because they showed up all at once with cops, there were no investigators asking about my daughter beforehand. They didn't give me much info at all about the who/what/where because then I would murder that person. They probably realize this and so kept their lips shut.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 08:22 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:23 AM
18

Basically someone made malicious anonymous reports that my wife and I were aware of child porn on my computer and that I was producing it. It was false, but they still took my daughter to a foster and put me in lockup. They raided and trashed my apartment and took every major electronic item, computers, gameboys, even my original xbox. 9 months later, all charges dropped.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:16 AM
2

I agree. Canada just had a decade of the conservatives because the vote is split three ways between two liberalish and one conservative party. If the left got it's act together we could do some important stuff. But these fools are too attached to their magical thinking
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:54 AM
3

Well I live in canada, so I am not 100% up to date on my american politics, but that just helps my point that I am more left that him. I voted NDP last election, they're more socialist than the USA has seen since at least like the 80s. Some of us use evidence based decision making and are not like the radfeminist emotions are all that matters type. Note I never said Bernie was hard left like you quoted. He isn't that far left in canada.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:42 AM
36

I was the same . Someone said I was inappropriate with my daughter and it took 9 months of my life and ruined them. Supposedly I was producing child porn. I am free and innocent but I couldn't be alone with my own daughter for most of a year. It's like they don't care that it harms the children too.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:36 AM
6

Fun fact: I am a lefty and am not choosy the way you describe. I am more left than Bernie Sanders. Some of us have sense.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:34 AM
0

That's silly. He should have said he only does men's hairstyles but will do them on women. He should do her hair as a bowl cut in the back, because his customers partially pay for a "safe space" he must use the area in the back for her services. This area has had development toward women's cuts representative to the market demand thus far for women's haircuts at his business (and must therefore be fair). Doesn't break the law to say he only knows how to cut men's hairstyles.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 11:20 AM
4

Get SAXX or other similar brand underwear and it will change your life. You will never need to lift your balls off your leg any more.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/15 11:42 PM
3

I have noticed this too, the worst sexists seem to be feminists. They think women need to be treated like it's a disability
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:50 AM
3

It's projection of her weakness. Like when a person says "I'm not scared of you," it's cause they're thinking of fear. If you're scared, you protect yourself, in this case she does it by making herself too strong to be attacked, in the least effective, most transparent way. By stating it. What other motivation would saying that serve? I imagine the curriculum doesn't include arm wrestling.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:35 AM
1

The spirit of the law is that only penis-weilders have the capacity to rape, rape cannot occur without penetration with the penis in their laws. There are other crimes not considered rape that include penetration using fingers or objects, and this woman has comitted felonious non-concentual envelopment, contributing to delinquency of a minor, etc. I am not a lawyer, but I am poorly recalling what I was once told by a lawyer. Everything I say is an approximation as Canada has laws modeled from th…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:51 AM
3

I agree, the laws contravene human rights. You can't have penalties for only some groups.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:15 AM
1

Rape is an act, but it is also a good legally defined felony. The law's description of rape in the UK requires a penis. If you don't have a penis with which to rape, you are legally incapable of rape, but socially speaking you are still a rapist. Does that help sort this clusterfuck?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:57 PM
2

Shit, you got me there. Subsidized, state-mandated propaganda is the most reliable and unbiased source for a growing mind. I don't even know why I objected.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:15 AM
2

ISIS could also hand out propaganda, would you be as nonplussed by that? Both intend on the deconstruction and authoritarian rule over a society they would mold to their agenda, and as per the agent orange files, feminist and islamic radicals both have no qualms with mass genocide as a tool to achieve that goal. The reality is that a governing body has decided this piece of propaganda is mandatory for every 16 year old citizen, and that is not a healthy behavior. What's worse is that it's a SOCI…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 05:10 AM
2

So what you're saying is you watched her become the lie she spouts? Men are not looked down on white cishet patriarchal opressor, and I will prove to you men can't be discriminated against by singling you out and making life hard. It's funny because she's opressing male students.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 02:24 AM
1

I guess I just can't reconcile the more than one mass shooting per week with this ancient holdout to protect for when the british return. Would you mind sourcing the etymological shift for "well regulated"? As an aside, you won't need to fret about me 'yelling,' at you. I love being shown that I was wrong, it means I won't ever be wrong in that topic again. Yeah I babbled a bit about the NRA, but how does drawing a admittedly weak connection that I state incomplete knowledge of the topic make yo…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:14 PM
1

I mean, do a criminal background and mental health check, register it to a human, require that you must attend the reasonable safety and maintenance classes at your friendly local shooting range, and how could you complain? Worst case scenario, you actually appreciate guns enough to sit through a boring safety thing you already know, and pinky swear not to murder by registering it to you while the local range gets a couple dollars for the class. The only reason to object to it is if you are one …
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:48 AM
1

In my dreams, politicians actually care about reality and facts. Basically I'm saying we need to get a necromancer up in here to bring back Jack Layton.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:11 AM
2

I get you, bro, I'm a gigantic pedant.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:09 AM
3

You're wrong, the means of production converts into the fiat currency, dollars. The dollars, directed by tax policy and government budgets, provide emergency responders, garbage collectors, mail systems, the army, and so on: that's the return, the fruit of the production of the service. You misunderstand that the fruit of production do not need be physical items like turnips. If the fire department produces nothing, we wouldn't have them. The fire dept. produces a community that is safer through…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:03 AM
1

Sorry. Mobile isn't the best for grammatical/syntactical cohesion.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:55 AM
1

Oh, you can't fault Canadians on border hopping for costco. First, it's goddamn costco, that is a company I respect for it's employee policies. They're rad. Second, Canada was once way less socialist then our hybridization today, and we still love us some capitalism. Got a ploy or deal to acquire product for cheap? Yeah let's do business. Normally up here that means excellent B.C. bud, but the principal is the same.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:48 AM
1

Private prisons are not only very real, they are a multibillion dollar industry. Would you like sources? I am very pleased to open some eyes... USA has over 10x more prisoners than any other country, including china. It's... inhuman to have it set up that way, yo.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:41 AM
5

Yes it is. The money is sourced from the society at large for it functionality and security. That's dictionary definition socialism.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:38 AM
2

Iirc, "Rape Culture" was coined referring to the men in american jails, and "Federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison" didn't fall victim to lies... you guys have PRIVATELY owned and operated prisons that are for profit. That's fucked up. If the tyranny of Canadian Socialism is so truly dwarfed in grevious injustice by the actual evil in the Capitalistic USA system, I do not see how 'try not paying taxes' could be something other than an endorsement of socialism or a condemnation of capitalism. The ar…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:32 AM
1

Well, non actions are very difficult to gauge, so I don't know for sure. Mulcair... while I don't agree with him quite as often as I would like, Trudeau acted like a bitch voting for c-51 and so that tainted my view on liberal (who were corrupt and innefectual in their last turn in power under Paul Martin). That in mind, I went and spoke to the candidates in my riding, and the only logical choice was Richard Cannings, an Ornithologist who ran NDP. I would need a lot more data to assign any kinda…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:24 AM
3

Well, you have a good point there, and I can't dispute it's truth, but it is fatally flawed when you remember to contrast with the much less socialist USA. However, taxes are (in my humble opinion) at least partly a civic duty. I gained from my society and the public works that support the whole deal, and they weren't free and I didn't build it. When I get a bit pissed at taxes, I remember that usually it's for helping someone who needs it and I am ok with that. If we could stop giving fucking o…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:55 AM
3

Well, that sounds pretty sweet actually. I heavily favour gun regulation like we have here in canada, but that doesn't mean healthy and capable people should be refused reasonable firearms. When I shoot, it's the perfect destresser. Nothing exists except me, the target, the space up to and past the firing arc, and the rhythm of my heart and lungs. A few beers and some shooting would rule. Alas, I have no passport. (I assume you aren't Canadian)
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:44 AM
1

Well, the police, fire fighters, EMTs, schools and a lot more than that are inherently and undeniably socialist, and we can run those without denial of rights and wrongthink. Perhaps I internalized it, but up here in free, single-payer socialist healthcare Canada I don't see much authoritarianism run amok. I mean, nobody's gonna argue that yes, the fed has authority and imposes it for social works, but my road is built by people who chose the job and can leave anytime. This is the key difference…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:36 AM
13

I would like to add that I am extremely left compared to American Democrats (who I consider center right by their actions) and voted for the socialist NDP in my country's recent election. I say this because, as a lefty socialist west-coast whatever-ya-wanna-call-me, I cannot stand the inherently hypocritical feminist shit like this. They're some metaphorical amalgam of small scale 1984,, a meta incarnation of the kkk, and an idiot Savant whose passion is trying to skew definitions by adding or s…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:49 AM
1

I know her name. Message me. If this was anywhere else I'd say it, but yeah.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:53 AM
1

What are you talking about? Where did I argue with you? You don't even know what you're saying. I jumped in cause I saw you lose your cool. I said nothing before that. What argument am I winning? Only the one where you surrender your chill.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 09:22 AM
2

Oh my bad, I thought multiple insults and 'holy fucking shit" weren't indicators of being calm. Obviously you're a zen master.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:10 AM
3

Wow, got called out, got mad. Calm down man.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 06:13 AM
3

Grow up
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 01:37 AM
1

All the lights in my house emit full spectrum lighting that is made to mimic natural sunlight, and this is not at all bearable. I imagine if I had some old school CFL bulbs it might work.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:31 PM
1

flu.x That was awful! It's like someone's kidneys began to fail directly into my monitor hue. Like dark, unhealthy, dialysis urine.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:19 PM
2

You really think that's it? A list two long? Bro, you're so cute, don't learn anything about feminism, I think it'd ruin your day. In my country, a man was arrested by the Military police for disagreeing with a feminist online that she had PTSD and it was as bad and as legit as the nightmares this soldier experiences. Combat-soldier PTSD, where a soldier's friends, dying in his arms, beg him to help, and nothing can be done except curse human greed and wrath while you bargain. This is what we're…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:15 PM
1

Ah, I see now, i thought it was intended differently, and I objectively failed to check it was the same person.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:11 AM
2

What a goddamned hatchet job.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/15 08:16 AM
2

I didn't justify anything. I said it was a character flaw, regarding your belief that Ronda Rousey is trans-phobic. There are physical differences between those with two x chromosomes and those who have a y. These are incontestably proven by science and anecdote both. You think that she's trans-phobic because of the "men beating women" thing. But she's right because they're genetically a man and woman in this hypothetical. The way we choose to treat someone socially because they are trans-gender…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 08:01 AM
2

TIL single character flaws qualify you as "trash." That means, due to your shitty prose, you're trash. I'm disabled, I must be lower than dirt, eh?
/r/MensRights31/10/15 07:02 AM
1

What else is a rapist? DUCKS! So, if it floats, then it's a rapist!
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:22 PM
1

Then she is proven lying anyway about the date. Timestamps etc.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:20 PM
1

https://1in6.org/the-1-in-6-statistic/
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:04 PM
2

What do you think is a more appropriat hypothetical wound equivalent? I don't know how else, my wife is able to live her life basically identical to before now that she's healed since surgery, so a woman losing her ability to reproduce doesn't seem like it has the same impact as I imagine I would have on my quality of life if my genitals were mutilated so totally and thoroughly as amputations.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:16 AM
3

This is because you lack knowledge of male anatomy. Biting off a man's testicles has the same effect as cutting off the penis because both of those mean they can never have sex again. The reason I added things like kidnapping and maiming is because merely having no uturus is nothing near this bad. My wife has one ova and no uturus but she's still smoking hot and can fuck like crazy. She's just fine: a man couldn't have sex (without tests you won't get erections). Basically the damage in this gen…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:38 AM
1

That's because a hysterectome is a major surgery. You can't simply bite and pull like with testes. Women have internal reproduction
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:21 AM
8

That's not even half as bad! This is the same as forcibly kidnapping a woman and removing her uturus, ovaries, and maiming her vaginal canal. The man is sterilized, and even if we ignore that he's now probably impotent and sterilized, there is an easy fix with breast implants, there are virtually no equivalent options for penis reconstruction.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:19 AM
21

Fucken rekt.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/15 09:17 PM
3

I think that's the weakest deflection. I got the point you're presenting. I just think you're wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/15 06:43 PM
3

Hey, point to wear I used the word black. You're projecting so hard you're denting my monitor.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/15 10:06 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/15 02:35 PM
11

Hood rats are human, not subhuman, they're just predisposed to poor relations with other social classes through culture/income disparities. Take your social justice and gtfo please.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/15 06:44 AM
7

That would be valid if it applied. She WAS being hysterical. Plus, it's just words.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/15 06:48 AM
1

Catoblepas
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/15 09:48 PM
1

I have IBD, for me, it's potty time.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:49 PM
2

You said "was," but I'd like to mention that it is still ongoing. We also never caught Kony. Nobody cares because of a combination of africa, and no oil.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:27 PM
3

There was also that diversity officer at a uni in the UK who was tweeting #killallwhitemen and her defence was also "white males are incapable of experiencing any forms of discrimination or racism."
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:49 AM
0

If individuals get mad for this being directed at women, I'd argue that it's entirely reasonable /r/mensrights would be mad for the equivalent. Are they required to not hold emotions when they have their viewpoint?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:44 AM
2

This is an elaborate reference to the movie Team America: World Police.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:36 AM
1

Not Just USA, Canada is exceedingly biased in favour of women. In my province, for every dollar a woman's specific purpose group received between 2011 and 2012, a men's equivalent recieved half a penney, according to federal budget. It's unreal.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:53 PM
2

Never simply knee-jerk move out, that's essentially a free gift of everything you own and the house if you're a married homeowner. If you leave, it's "her domicile" even if you own it.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 10:40 AM
8

They ask to do a free fortune telling, then insist you pay after or they will damage your vehicle(like the lady they targeted). When the cops show up, she says the victim is scamming her by not paying.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/15 01:04 AM
2

Ja I am made of butter and you are worth 2k monies
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 03:21 AM
11

The child was WAY out of the range of SIDS. The kid was 3.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:59 PM
9

She is an amazing ally. Such a sharp mind, I reccomend any video on her channel.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:46 PM
4

I think the difference is money. Most people are too poor for those things. Stupid people do stupid stuff, smart people do that stuff less, and rich people have the option to cover more of their ass.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:34 AM
4

Faith is what you have when you don't have good reasons to believe something. A cynic is someone who is conditioned through their life to expect the worst consequences from events.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:31 AM
1

Are you sure that doesn't violate rules of the subreddit? Either way, how did you come by her name? I've never seen or heard the name, and 'Jackie' has always been called a pseudonym.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:56 AM
7

Except for the part where we refer to her with a pseudonym and she isn't named.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:18 AM
1

The extremists are always the more true religious followers. Example: If you don't believe in a literal garden of eden, you don't have any reason for Jesus to die for original sin. Now I'm an atheist, but it's undeniably true the more hardline the religion, the more closely they follow the text.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:57 AM
-7

But they're so delicious!! bacon in batter... oh yeah.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 11:33 PM
1

Doesn't matter what she was saying, I could say anything, like Tupac is undercover and alive living in Singapore, but it wouldn't make that true. I don't give a shit if she says the guy is racist, being a muslim is not about race.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/15 01:29 AM
1

Religion is still not a race because you can deconvert from islam but not from being white.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/15 10:19 PM
4

You cannot stop being black, you can stop being muslim. Q.E.D. You are wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/15 10:18 PM
30

As a parent, they do develop quicker. Physically, though, not mentally.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:45 PM
4

I'm really sorry to hear about your herpes. I hear there's a cream.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/15 10:20 AM
-9

You're as ridiculous as that conspiracy. Just cause you can show some things you said aren't lies, does not mean you have outlined enough supporting evidence for anyone to even consider your idea. You're saying that " the government is essentially an instrument to strip men of money and hand it to women," and you have never shown that that is the goal co-ordinated for and secretly pushed by the government. Furthermore, if the government merely strips money from men for women, then why is it they…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:57 AM
17

I disagree with your blanket categorization. /r/mensrights, and /r/redpill are way different, inasmuch that /r/redpill is very radical in comparison.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 04:23 AM
3

In the states, I would be surprised if that was true. Fuck and record it in your apartment, and they either have nothing on you, or every burglar caught on cctv can also sue via these wiretapping laws. I'm pretty sure that's a can of worms they won't open.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:02 PM
1

No, now everyone is aware that you, indeed, are the one who does not comprehend the hilarity of your logical fallacy. Here you go, verify me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman I would like to apologize to the subreddit for my dickishness. He totally triggered me guise.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:51 PM
1

Why be so strict? it just creates more problems. Not everyone is as well off as you: for example, I'm mentally ill, and I hallucinate on an hourly basis. If I got to a point where I was unsafe near my child, why would you force me to remain? That's objectively more harmful a stance because it doesn't allow for human compassion or any deviation from the norm. Not everyone has the same experience as you, and a super bad drug addict, or a mentally ill person, or anyone else who does not consider th…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:27 AM
31

That's what's called a "no true scottsman," it's a logical fallacy. When you make logical fallacies, assholes like me laugh at you for showing your argument isn't rational.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:21 AM
1

I'm of the opinion that men and women are different, and I exhibit chivalrous behaviour, but only if that woman's earned it first. There's nothing saying an mra can't pull out chairs and that kinda stuff. No need to hand in a 'card'. I take issue with it being required. If someone demands special treatment, that basically disqualifies them from special treatment in my books. You have to deserve it, not demand it, and shaming men with charges of sexism isn't how you go about getting respect from …
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:57 AM
9

You are. People disagree because of feminism's taint in society. They wanted rights, but also wanted chivalry's treatment of women to stay. Non-chivalric men were sexist back when that was the social contract, so to keep their privilege, they have an incentive to shame men who don't give them that treatment as though that social contract was still valid.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:15 AM
1

You could email the devs of /r/outside.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:57 PM
7

No. That's fucking stupid. Her premise is that if she ignores all humans as if she could clip through them, and she bumps a man, that's oppression against women. That's wrong, and stupid.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:49 AM
2

Done and done.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:01 AM
10

Because she's a horrible human being who won't stop lying.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:56 AM
-1

You care enough to respong. I'm trollin at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/15 03:57 AM
-1

I'm no etymologist, so I'll trust you're right. However, I only noted the term jabroni used by canadians up until recently, since we've been using the term for ~20 years I can verify(I'm 26).
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/15 03:36 AM
1

But why not in an adjacent enclosure and pretty much any non-publishing space? I don't get why one must literally climb an elephant.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:00 AM
-14

I think it's just average for a rural Canadian article of slang. Like out fer a rip.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/15 08:19 AM
1

Why would their editorial board require housing for an elephant?
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:47 AM
1

Rough sleeping is a term where I'm from that's equated with 'roughin' it,' which is also sleeping outdoors, usually in a forest or somesuch.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:44 AM
4

IDK about that guy, but all my farts come from a place less than 4 feet from my nose, called an asshole. It would be impractical to never sniff my own farts, and I assume the same is true for everyone who doesn't have a stoma, and a stoma comes with a literal bag of shit, so you'll end up with scent of shit anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/15 03:41 PM
2

So, you're upset and object... because someone was non-literal on the internet? Math forgive me if I accidentally use hyperbole.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:55 PM
5

They're so serious.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 07:24 AM
2

The biggest sin to them is exposing them for their ridiculousness, and then they're hurt by the ridicule they earned. That's a pretty good point imo.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:18 AM
3

Everyone makes mistakes.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:19 PM
6

He had Sarkeesian on. Leave it at this and spare yourself.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 09:10 PM
96

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_pQ7KXv0o0&list=WL&index=7 I believe this shows that we've known that the wage gap myth is false since '81.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:35 PM
1

You don't appear to know much about language, do you? Just because I say I hate faggots doesn't mean gay people should be offended if you're right, because words change but approriate usage never does right??? Obviously I mean sticks right?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:18 AM
1

I can totally be wrong. I just take issue with words being put in my mouth.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:25 AM
1

No, nobody suggested that. At all. Don't straw-man because you feel bad after someone corrects out in the scary internet.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:47 PM
1

I'm not blaming anyone for your usage of that word, except you. I think that definition is old and out dated, so I disagree with it, but that doesn't mean I'm blaming other people for what your mouth says. I also took issue with the concept of using a dictionary definition as a prop in intellectual discussion.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:06 PM
1

Attacking things that don't line up with your worldview is endemic to all humans as a species, silly.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:01 PM
-1

Why do I have to come in here with my hand on my dick by... showing an easily explained means through which you misunderstood the sub, not everyone being out to get you because you're not "in a circlejerk," which I personally replace with "doesn't accept statistics and reports at face value" because it's more intellectually honest in my opinion. I really do just disagree with you because I don't think you've made a coherent case. I have heard much more evidence that has filled my burden of proof…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:30 AM
0

I think, not sure, he was trying to mirror you. It succeeded, because he didn't make sense. Men are thought to have a similar attempt rate for suicide, but when a woman eats 2 bottles of advil and thinks that's enough, everyone knows. They know because of the flashy ambulance lights, and the facebook dramas from loved ones, and so forth. When I put a gun in my mouth and cock it, crying alone in my bachelor apartment where I can't make rent for- because of my alimony, then nobody hears about it. …
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:20 AM
0

/s only makes sense if that isn't a moderately accurate summary. And, the Agent Orange feminists are real, so /s would be lying.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:14 AM
1

Uhh, wow. I hope you know, dictionaries aren't used in this context as fiat word interpretation, that's not the purpose of a dictionary. A dictionary describes usage, and because we use a living language that does not stop evolving, to go and attempt this litteraly, you'd have to be able to create a folio of the collective knowledge of every word in a language, which would be bigger than wikipedia. And even then, trying it just makes one seem foolish, because only a language like Latin or Proto-…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:47 AM
0

Translation: "I made no mention of my sources, expertise, or legitimacy, but have an inherently-flawed methodology that has things I like in it! I know, when they point out that I'm typing lots of words but communicating almost nothing, I'll reverse the tense of their argument, and pretend like I have intellectual honesty, and all the transitional fossils of patriarchy up to the current day"
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:38 AM
3

But tom cruz actually made good movies.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:01 AM
7

It's a confirmed hoax. They admitted it. The men in the video, who were volunteer students, were lied to and told it wouldn't be used this way.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 12:43 PM
9

Dictionary-style definitions describe USAGE not the entire scope of the word. Good job using fallacies, though.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:41 AM
0

US law system is not good. You are mistaken. It would be good, but generally is corrupt.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:19 AM
1

Harmless if attractive? None of them were white either. Those scary ugly black men on the street said good morning sob one even called me mami whatever the fuck that means. Can't you see women are systematically held downby men??????? Im so glad this is the mentality we fight against. so easy to pick apart.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:32 PM
3

Feminists mock people who point that out. I cannot see why, cognitive dissonance probably.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:27 PM
1

Jesus fucking christ that was heavy. I feel so bad for that poor guy.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:12 AM
2

I was being a bit hyperbolic, but I don't think I said you should lose your freedom of speech just by being rich. It's more that rich people don't have real problems. If you have to go cry in your Bentley because you lost your summer home in Greece, you have no real issues. It's not like you're crying in a shopping cart because you lost your small apartment and are now homeless, a real problem. Problems that rich people have are basically opt-in. If you have a billion dollars and get a new $30K …
/r/MensRights27/08/14 01:00 AM
2

If you net 1 million dollars a year, fuck you, you can shut the hell up about everything. You don't have any actual problems unless you got a terminal disease or a drug addiction or something. I invite millionaires that complain to go live as a homeless person for one month. After that month, they'll shut the fuck up about their non-issues, or they're amoral. That being said, it sucks every time the law takes advantage of people and injustice needs redress.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:32 AM
3

Oh, good, then we agree. He totally acts contrary to the goals and ethics of this place. Thank you for your concession.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:04 PM
3

No they don't. He's never said he is one, and no MRA group praises his actions. Just because crazies exist doesn't mean you can pin them to your boogeyman.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:23 PM
0

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/news/women-may-have-invented-weapons/story-e6frg8gf-1111113050387?nk=8b3ffed8de7d4cde62f3f250e7b79c51 I'm just getting off the computer, and I couldn't find an ideal source in my hurried situation, so this'll have to do for now. Essentially, the thought is that a female proto-human was attacked, and in desperation, used a tool to fend off the attack. Female apes also use tools much more frequently than males, and it is theorized that this is why.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:04 AM
0

No, it's widely accepted scuentific fact that women are naturally craftier than men because they can't default to brawn like men. For this reason, women are credited with the invention of tools and weapons. The previous commenter didn't make a sexist hyperbole, that was a fact.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:56 PM
5

a large proportion of people ignore drug interactions This is why your argument is invalid. A lot of people murder, doesn't excuse it.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:44 AM
3

I can feel the heat radiating off of your seething buttfrustration.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:34 AM
-5

There isn't just one, technically f'd is also one. I choose to use fix'd.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:38 AM
-1

It was shortened, in terms of letters used. The amount was lessened by one, and replaced with a non-letter character. I fully admit it's not a proper word, but it's still grammatically correct. What's the argument again?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:45 AM
-11

A contraction is a shortened version of the written and spoken forms of a word, syllable, or word group, created by omission of internal letters (actually, sounds). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraction_(grammar)
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:42 AM
-19

My vernacular is the reason why.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:34 AM
-22

Fix'd is correct, because an apostrophe is there to denote a contraction, and ergo, the missing letters.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:23 AM
-21

I imagine you don't debate and need quotes, because you have trouble using words. Fix'd. Who is incapable of appropriate word usage, again?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 03:48 AM
-25

Very concise. I'm using this next time I see this kind around. No name calling, no debate, just 'you don't belong here.' Excellent.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 03:21 AM
2

Honestly, I don't care what they do, they can't be as bad as Harper. Remember, we're Canadians, socialism isn't a dirty word here. It doesn't matter if they're superfeminists or not, the Conservatives are stripping our democracy away by weakening our ability to detect fraud in elections, muzzling scientists, and by leashing the CBC via directly controlling the money, not to mention they did away with public financing of elections. Until we get democracy back properly, there's only one issue: cor…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:18 AM
2

You say that like the Conservatives aren't the worst possible choice.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:04 PM
1

While I agree, we're hated enough already. They put what they find out of context and claim we all want that. Yeah, hopeles, but not powerless. Let's not help them trivialize or marginalize us.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:13 PM
6

Shit like this gets screen-shotted and ends up on my facebook. Please be more obvious or label your satire.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:48 PM
2

Right in muh sojinee.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:29 PM
1

You're right, there were clearer words I could've typed. My bad.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:43 AM
1

Man vs coward. Being a coward does not remove a y chromosome. Cowardice is equal opportunity.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:16 AM
0

I know, I wasn't labeling the gender, I was labeling specifically the person who was cowardly.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:04 AM
16

He's probably going through a little mental and/or emotional trauma. His (feminist) self-identity was just shaken to the core, and what's more, he was the victim of an attack. Some people are just not at all suited to getting into fights, and living in western society, he's probably never seen real combat. Combine that with valid concerns for his freedom because of imprisonment on false claims (which we know she's at least considering- she straight-up said she'd do it). This guy's like 6 months …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:32 AM
-7

Howsabout man vs coward.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:24 AM
1

You overestimate feminists' intellectual honesty. You're one copy/paste away from being out of context.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:01 AM
1

When dealing with feminist topics, you can't afford to leave things that are obvious unsaid lest you become another strawman.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:29 PM
1

Oppressing black people does not imply sexism. So you can drop that first part.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:32 PM
1

WOW critical misread of previous comment. This edit is to conceal my shame.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 12:59 AM
2

Then why is it that women do not preform as well physically as men? How would you explain that men put muscle on faster, and they put more of it on overall?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 04:39 AM
3

Who's the sexist now? EDIT: I'm not hiding, the internet isn't a real place. You come to me, and we'll see who's hiding, internet tough guy. Penticton, BC, Canada. We can meet at the giant peach on the Okanagan beachfront.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:44 AM
5

Some things must be removed because they violate site policy. You're trying too hard.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:40 AM
3

System reference document, usually.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:48 AM
2

GWW, I just wanted to mention that I totally love you in a platonic way. You are awesome.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:47 AM
2

It's actually quite the stereotype breaker. I just ran the numbers through google (I can't math today I haves the dumb) and every summer I remember hit 122F at least once(and winter got to -4F this year). The town I live in is called Penticton, and is absolutely beautiful. We have two large lakes with great sandy beaches, with a man-made channel between them so you can float down it and drink beer/smoke weed. Very popular activities here. We're a tourist town, essentially, because every summer p…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 08:58 PM
1

I haven't tried cocaine, but I have had other uppers. PM me if you are interested.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:36 AM
1

In terms of celcius we get -15 to 50 on average in a year. I live in the only Arid desert in Canada, and it's amazing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okanagan
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:21 AM
1

Hi, by the way. You rock. That is all.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:13 AM
1

Lucky? Nah, it's more like our politicians are less corrupt. IMO it's a given that you can record in your own home. Plus, Where I am, it gets 110+ Fahrenheit summers and winters probably don't get to 0 Fahrenheit. I'm bad with imperial so forgive me if the winter figure is off(summer isn't).
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:13 AM
1

It's a real fun one, eh? Do you also happen to be heavily alcohol tolerant?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:22 AM
1

Blatantly stolen from google: Canada requires "one-party notification" - only one person in the conversation needs to be aware that the conversation is being taped. In other words, the person taping the conversation must be participating in it. You will find this law in the Criminal Code of Canada. CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA: PART VI: INVASION OF PRIVACY: Section 183.1: Where a private communication is originated by more than one person or is intended by the originator thereof to be received by mor…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:22 AM
2

I am on disability for my mental illness and was also raising my very new baby girl. We didn't have the money to pay for the 'elective' general anesthesia. Thankfully, as a Canadian, the whole thing cost me $0. General would've been +$200. I chose to spend that cash on my daughter. And food. I am tooting my own horn, so forgive me, but I'm pretty good with pain, so I figured it'd be fine. It was, after about 25 minutes. I also got a fun story out of it. BONUS FUN: Do you know what colour the ins…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 12:55 AM
2

For you beiberfan1998? No.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 12:30 AM
4

No, you can record the inside of your home. Otherwise security cameras would be an expensive waste. Plus, a sticker on a window is enough to pass that law by anyway. Regardless, I'm in Canada.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:56 PM
2

Or, record everything in your home. Then the 'rape' will come forth with video showing that's a lie.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:44 PM
1

15 minutes of pain, week of tenderness for a good payoff. Not dissimilar to getting in a fight(where only your balls are mangled.) I definitely think it's worth it despite my very rare 'complication'. If the numbing works for you, there's little that would be a concern.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:17 PM
1

After everything is done and they stop cutting, there isn't much pain. Just soreness.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:07 PM
3

I have bad mental health, and never really wanted kids, so it was important I get it(don't regret the one I have of course- she's an angel! Don't provoke my proud daddy gushing, you've been warned). Once I set my mind for sure, I am too stubborn to quit. Plus after the shock set in, I couldn't move anyway. I handled it ok, even shook the doctor's hand after. The funny part is that while my body un-seized I postponed the next vasectome by 15 minutes. Picture this: You show up for your vasectome, …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:12 PM
2

Yes, I have had dental work and 3 ingrown toenail operations before this. My family is predisposed to immunity, and my father and sister (not my brother, oddly) are both immune as well. Shouldn't be an issue if you have had dental work and the freezing worked. I'm really good at sitting still (I didn't want any mistakes!!) but most people aren't and the doctor has an incentive to make sure you're 100% numb. I essentially consented to the doctor continuing when he realized that I could most defin…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:51 PM
4

I had a different experience than the other guy who responded. I'm immune to localized numbing, and I felt everything. I've never been in more pain in my 25 years. After it was done I had gone into shock and my body seized up like I was a solid piece of wood. The female nurse didn't believe me and grabbed my wrist to move me, and my body moved as though I had no joints. It was excruciating. That being said, I'm pretty tough, and so I have no regrets. I already have a child, and do not want more.…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:35 PM
2

Having a child changes EVERYTHING, unless you're not very responsible(or are very wealthy). I'm a stay at home dad, and there is so much I either can't do or must find other ways to do so that I can take care of my daughter.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:54 AM
1

If you look carefully, you'll note that I appended no specific behaviours to 'real man' (how I hate that phrase...). Merely I asserted that a man acts to his own will and codes of ethics. Yes, women have pussies, and yes, men have dicks, but that has little regard toward blanket statements regarding gender-behaviour correlations.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:51 PM
2

Firstly, you are assuming I know shit all about taoism. Secondly, you are showing you know shit all about taoism. I think you might mean to reference the Jains, but taoists are not I herently pacifists. Taoists believe spirits inhabit practically every inanimate object and have very varied morality. (Writing this drunk as fuck, will make corrections in the realm of sobriety.)
/r/MensRights10/04/14 09:24 AM
2

You are showing with a comment this that you're laughable and beneath serious reply. Calm down, brave internet warrior, and if you ask nicely, I'll explain how you're embarrassing yourself tomorrow.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:12 AM
2

When you know you're typing and therefore are not communicating tone at all, you either use context cues, such as /s, or it's kind of your fault for another person taking your words at their value.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:43 AM
6

I was expecting you, based on other redditors, to be aggressive by default, but I was pleasantly surprised that we can agree!
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:10 AM
50

I mostly agree with you, except when you assert you know what a real man is. Real men do what they feel is right and do not follow strict rules imposed by others regarding their actions.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:41 AM
4

You are embarrassing yourself.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:37 AM
-1

Yeah, howsabout fuck you. You are exactly why we hate feminists, you've just reversed the genders. Bigot.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:36 AM
9

No, those tactics are dirty and are not honourable. I want to defeat someone, not their straw-man. Feminism is evil enough that we don't need lies.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:32 PM
3

Fuck you.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:33 AM
3

I can agree with that. But it's not relevant, since it's done on infants without consent or valid reason, which is kind of the topic.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 02:21 AM
1

It's when you misrepresent other arguments in order to show they are not worth consideration. Like what creationists do with evolution. You were saying?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:26 AM
2

I assume you're being facetious... because I weigh 130 pounds, and I defy you to find a 95 year old man that I couldn't beat in a fistfight. I'm no super-strong guy, I'm not saying I'm amazing, I'm saying I'm less capable than the average man based on that parameter, but that I would still have the overwhelming advantage.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:21 AM
6

No, The issue was where you object to not cutting up babies without good reason (because the issue is up in the air, we can't conclude there are good reasons to do it) and equivocate it with with surgeons cutting as little as possible in order to access and address an identified health hazard that was deemed important enough to operate. That would also require it to be the best/only way to solve the issue at hand. The false equivalence is where, in the infant, there's no clearly identified issue…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:03 AM
7

Logical Fallacy of the day: False equivalence. http://www.skepticalraptor.com/logicalfallacy_files/False_Equivalence.html
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:08 AM
8

No, it's entirely settled. It may not be settled regarding the benefits of circumcision, but it'd by definition unhealthy to amputate healthy flesh. I get less of a chance for skin cancer and bone cancer if I cut off my pinkies, but that doesn't make it "healthier."
/r/MensRights23/03/14 08:20 AM
13

Well, it doesn't matter, because they'd be wrong either way.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:01 AM
1

In Canada, our horrible, right wing government is roughly equivalent to your democrats, then we have the liberal party, and then we have an even further left party called the NDP, and I typically support them. I do not say punishment is bad, and support it as human nature requires incentives and disincentives to shape behavior. Stop being so ignorant, and using logical fallacies(straw-man, in this case).
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:57 AM
2

I didn't think you'd not know, especially if you got into a discussion about it, and acted as insultingly as you have. I apologized for my use of bro aka brother, as you took it wrong. I thought you were actually worth discussing this with, but I see I was mistaken. In the future, don't wade into arguments you are ignorant of, please, I wasted a lot of time here. As for the function, let me google that for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreskin I'm done with you, because I don't want to deal…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 02:09 AM
3

Like an earlobe, except for the permanent nerve damage caused by severing the nerves. Also, the earlobe has no major functions, so this isn't even a good analogy. The foreskin has functions and is not "excess skin." I mean, some foreskins can be overdeveloped and have excess skin, but that's moot because it does serve a function overall, unlike an earlobe.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:36 PM
3

I'm not trying to be a prick, I feel like you are, however. You are ignoring the permanent nature of the removal, and furthermore, you're showing that you don't even understand what a foreskin is or what it does. It's analogous to an eyelid. It serves purposes, and has specialized functions that stretching skin out does not replicate.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:17 PM
3

You provided an example of a non-permanent circumcision... that had permanent effects. I'm sorry you seem offended I called you an abbreviation of brother, didn't expect that to be offensive. Regardless, your example is invalid. An eyebrow piercing is non-permanent, because everything regrows. Nerves, when severed, cannot be regrown. Please provide a non-permanent circumcision example, or concede the point.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:26 PM
3

Bro, that doesn't restore the nerves.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:17 PM
3

Backup your claims, or you just look like a child saying 'nuh-uh science chooses MY SIDE!!!!!1!'
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:04 PM
1

Your argument is invalid because you claim that feminism works in a spectrum, and then go and ignore that feminists claim to be for 'equality.' An equality movement regarding gender tries to redress all grievances into neutral territory. Feminism can't do what you say and still identify as it does today: in other words, the organization you call feminism is imaginary, because the real version claims to be the end-all to any kind of discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:02 PM
2

I'm sorry, but can you point out to me when a type of circumcision isn't permanent?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:55 PM
8

There's an invisible exception to us, case in point: all the brigading.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:30 PM
6

Video not available in Canada.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:10 PM
12

Those things you listed are not true. Men in america are raped more often than women. Men are the victims of 70%(iirc) all violent crime. So on and so forth. You're just wrong, sir.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:44 AM
2

I've heard bigger bullshit defenses... however I've never heard one this critically inane and stupid actually work. Then again, the fact they chose such a goddamn dumb defense might show they actually have it XD
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:41 PM
12

No, it's his legal defense. They made up "affluenza" as in a portmanteau of affluent(wealthy) and influenza(the flu). They argued that he was so privileged his whole life that he couldn't understand his actions had consequences because he'd never had to deal with any consequences. This is what the boy's lawyer said in court. It is not an assumption. It's the whole hinging argument his lawyers used for hours on end to get him the lightest possible sentence. You didn't even read the linked page: t…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:07 AM
3

Before I became a father, I didn't have some insights that fatherhood brought. Everyone has different life experiences, but that doesn't mean that they're an oracle or an idiot. I don't think that I know what it's like to grow up in rural china. And I certainly wouldn't be offended if someone prefaced a related statement with "Growing up in rural china gave me this deep insight that makes your argument invalid." Some people know more than me or you. In fact, everyone knows something we don't.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:01 PM
8

I caution against that. Women who are parents are perfectly capable of having insights others may not. If we radicalize and don't think critically, then we're no better than feminists.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:31 PM
1

Constructive Criticism: Stop calling it patriarchy theory, theories are proven to be true and are supported with evidence, otherwise it's a hypothesis. That's why it's the 'Theory of relativity', 'the theory of gravity', but not the 'theory of creationism.' One of these things is not like the other (specifically there is a scientific consensus on all but the latter.)
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:03 PM
7

If you want to help the MRM as a female, I would point you to GirlWritesWhat, she's one of the most widely respected female advocates we have. She has a sharp wit and is a great role model for MR advocacy. http://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:46 PM
0

This is canada's law on the subject. I don't think it applies unless they commit an indictable offense. Fraud 380. (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service, (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-m…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:05 AM
3

War of 1812. We burned it down.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:01 AM
1

Doing shitty things, no they don't deserve a pass. They did nothing illegal, and you, in this hypothecal, did do something. You aren't thinking about this from the police's point of view. She is providing a service (to assholes and douchebags) that is legal. You steal the products she provides. You claim she is wrong. She claims you are wrong. Only one of you have proof the other committed a crime. And by the way, americans were rather concerned when we burnt down the white house. And germans wh…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:03 AM
9

Yes. You stole from a pregnant woman. I don't know about you or your country, but I live in Canada, and they'd come for you.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 11:39 PM
16

Because you'll go to jail.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 11:24 PM
1

I think we disagree then, good sir. Neither of us have sufficiently compelling evidence to sway the other.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:40 AM
2

He was under orders to not react, that is the definition of vulnerability. As far as wet willies, ears aren't used as frequently or to the extent that the mouth is: it's an undeniable erogenous zone for humans (ex. kissing/blow jobs/etc). Ear jobs are a family guy joke, and doesn't constitute a very credible defense. She put her bodily fluids on and around his mouth while kissing with the expressed purpose to provoke retaliation. The action provokes a retaliatory response because it's offensive …
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:26 AM
3

You mean like putting her bodily fluids on and around his mouth when he can't respond because he's under direct orders to hold the line unless someone initiates violence. She took advantage of him, in a sexual manner. Sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:09 AM
1

It's also composition fallacy.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:54 PM
3

There ARE women who can do the same combat effective job that men can, but there are many fewer than the men who can. I think we should never lower any standards for entry to cater to women as far as acceptance, but if they can pass the trials, I think they can go to war for us.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 07:00 PM
1

:D
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:45 PM
2

Intentional = / = fucked up. What I said is that I accidentally an entire coca cola bottle. Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like? It's a literary device used humorously to show an error.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:47 PM
4

I put an example in the explanation.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:17 PM
12

venerable means old or ancient. It's not pedantry when you're sentence makes no sense.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 05:39 PM
2

This is not the case. Psychopaths don't feel emotion the same way we do, and have no empathy. Oftentimes they are amazing, perfect mimics of emotions and will manipulate people. Antisocial personality disorder is essentially someone who has chemical imbalances that cause behaviors that don't mesh well with society, such as extreme aggression in a very introverted person. Another example is a hermit type person.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 10:04 AM
1

I agree, but your whole situation down there is utterly retarded. At least this is one step further in the right direction.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:13 AM
0

That's laughable. You have plenty of money, you just refuse to stop spending it all on 'defense.' #1 in world military spending, more than any other 2 countries combined. The only time you've been properly invaded was by canada in the war of 1812, and we're not a threat. Three of the next four biggest spenders are allies. It's that you need money out of politics, not that you need to stop giving healthcare.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:09 AM
1

Because the insurance companies have predatory plans that appear to be good, with a $50 premium, but in the fine print it says that it covers almost nothing, and your cap for money back is $50. I wish I was making that up.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 12:43 AM
0

I agree we should end the hypocrisy, but the answer isn't leaving millions high and dry. We need to give the same benefits to men, not remove benefits from women.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 12:10 AM
1

Yep, that's why we're all here.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:43 PM
1

Well, I don't like that men don't get options. That doesn't mean we need to take the ball and go home. It's important that people be in control of their reproduction, and you can't expect humans to simply not have sex, it's the second strongest instinct we have after survival.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:33 PM
1

Well, that sucks. Get money out of politics and watch how fast things change www.wolf-pac.com
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:31 PM
2

You're expecting respect while actively hating a huge group with no sources to back your claim. And you accuse liberals of not earning respect?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:30 PM
2

I made it clear that my penis is racist, and that while I had nothing against black people, but that I couldn't control who I was and was not attracted to. Otherwise I'd be bisexual because objectively speaking 2x>1x where x=hot people, and therefore bisexuality is the superior sexuality.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:28 PM
1

Get money out of politics and things will change fast.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:14 PM
1

Depends on how much money you make. If you can't pay, you don't. I'm on disability for mental illness(hallucinations being the primary reason) so my experience may differ from yours.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:12 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:11 PM
6

Right now vasalgel hasn't gone through the appropriate trials. It would be unwise, and in fact dangerous to break these regulations.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:10 PM
1

It's to ensure people don't get fucked by junk insurance
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:09 PM
0

I don't know about america but I got my vasectomy free here in Canada. Plus, if we're talking about reproductive variety stuff, viagra is covered for men. Similar.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:08 PM
3

I believe so as well.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:07 PM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:06 PM
-5

Didn't mean the comic to be comical? I'm confused, please elaborate.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:37 PM
15

Because vasalgel is coming. Also I don't think it applies to men. I'm Canadian, so honestly you should all just switch to a single-payer system like we have. It's very clearly superior, and it's not even that great compared to other socialized healthcare countries.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:34 PM
18

Yep. I just didn't want to leave it there as though it were fact, because it feeds into what I consider to what I consider harmful political ideologies. Your point remains, I just had an issue with the specific thing put at the beginning. Hell, I agree with the statement that in the American system, the government probably shouldn't pay for birth control pills. The system they worked out is win/win, and clearly superior.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:22 PM
0

Oh yes, of course, never let facts get in the way of a good joke! I just wanted to add some commentary.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:52 PM
509

America's government isn't paying for birth control, that's a right wing talking point. They simply mandated that insurance cover it, and mostly the companies liked that because it's cheaper to pay for birth control than it is to pay for a baby.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:12 PM
2

That's a logical fallacy known as composition fallacy. Just because some members of the KKK are nice doesn't mean the group isn't evil.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:12 AM
2

I think what you're describing is gender egalatarianism, it's certainly not modern feminism.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:36 AM
1

That's a good argument. I just wanted to see that it wasn't wildly situational. I was kind of an asshole before, I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:00 PM
12

What was the other rule it broke? Because your argument for the first one is laughable weak, in that it's provably false.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:34 PM
1

Hold down the alt key and press 0153 on the numpad. You will end up with the character ™
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:41 AM
0

In Canada, and I speak as a canadian, in court trials the party that presses charges is the crown. Remember we have the queen on our money and are not legal system clones of america.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:40 AM
-1

I agree with you, but it's empirically wrong that men don't want to limit women getting abortions. Certainly not all men, but look at texas. Look at the disgraceful planned parenthood setup the US has. That's mostly men that did that.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:31 AM
4

It doesn't even interview or quote a single man, and in addition the writer is female. Say a man did a piece on abortion, and only spoke to men on the topic, and the first quoted person basically says they're whining but is IS TECHNICALLY possible they have a point.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:28 AM
3

It's ugly to take a victory and keep whining about it, and the national post writes a piece about men having the option for legal parental surrender, which I support. They didn't lie and say that feminism was in favor of equality from the get go on the issue, they fairly stated that a small but growing number of feminists support the option to grant men some of the reproductive rights of women. I wouldn't support giving a man the option to abort like a woman has because it's not his body, so I'm…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:24 AM
2

No, you see, men have no rights as soon as a woman's pregnant with his kid. He can't legally surrender rights to the child(obviously it's immoral to abort a fetus someone else is gestating, but this allows for the equivalent). Women can also surrender children to adoption without any say from the father, and once it's done, the father can't get the child back. There are many more examples. No offense intended, but it's really easy from a female perspective to think you have as many rights as men…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:00 AM
2

I'm going to disagree, women are equal. If nothing else, men have less rights than women.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 07:02 PM
0

Only by a little bit. Surprise! The strong are more likely to rape! 60/40 isn't something that would make it one gender's deal.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:07 AM
6

Why would they? They're outlaws.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 09:02 AM
1

Sadly I'm pressed for time, but if you look in the archive here on this subreddit, I swear either that it's there or alternatively that I have a true belief it is there and intend no deception. Does anyone else remember that thread? I mean, I could be wrong, but I recall looking at the source and raging that it was where I live.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 02:38 AM
2

Authority? Plenty. How many groups with power were exclusively men's only? Cause there are none now.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 02:33 AM
1

From this subreddit. I'm sure most of it goes to the bureaucrats though.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 01:03 AM
1

Nah, have some right here next to my computer. >.>
/r/MensRights09/11/13 12:57 AM
-1

It's ok, few are lol. Mostly we're viewed as america's polite hat. I have the perspective that we're much larger and on top, so in prison terms, we're bubba, and america is the bitch. Of course, let's just go by history where Canada beats america in our wars against eachother and completely ignore that we'd be outmatched if it happened today. Then again, you think illiterate shepherds in Afghanistan was a bad enemy? Try coming up here with our trained hunters and huge landmass, and see how it wo…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:12 PM
-5

Where is my god? Nonexistant.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:03 PM
-5

DOWNVOTES ARE NOT FOR DISAGREEMENT. This redditor was contributing to the discussion rationally and politely. Please stop the downvotes. I am upvoting to foster discussion.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:56 PM
5

That was Alberta, but that province is right next door so I'll forgive you since you are norwegian ;D.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:53 PM
35

You're joking right? They're all over the place. There's probably dozens in my town alone. My mom belongs to two clubs; kayaking and swimming both of which do not admit men. My dad wanted to go kayaking with my mom's group and they wouldn't let him. Then there's places like curves, and women-only gyms. Are you really unaware of how pervasive it is? EDIT: I should also add that men's crisis groups get literally 1% the funding women's groups of the same nature get. $50M to $500K EDIT2: Forgot to m…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:20 PM
22

Alright, but then we need to abolish female only groups too. It's already illegal to have men only groups in Canada, iirc. Female-only? Just fine.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:09 PM
-1

Look, this is hideous and evil of these feminists. But this was 20 years ago.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:28 AM
3

Jurisdictions such as the entire country of New Zealand.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:58 PM
5

I am so goddamn relieved for you guys. This is the beginning to the end!
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:18 AM
2

Theism means belief in more than no deity. Atheism means a(without) theism(belief in more than no deities). It's the actual makeup of what the word's parts break down to. Gnostic means positive knowledge, agnostic means a(without) gnostic(positive knowledge). Basically you'd need to make up a whole new set of words for this if you contend it's a spectrum.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:10 PM
1

There is no magic third option. You can be an agnostic, but it has nothing to do with religion whatsoever. Agnostic means "I don't know," but it doesn't say about what. Gnosticism has absolutely nothing to do with belief, it has to do with knowledge. You can be a 'gnostic theist', 'agnostic theist', 'agnostic atheist', or a 'gnostic atheist'. You don't get to be 'agnostic' unless you want the world to know that you know nothing about what you're professing, as per the name.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:53 PM
2

I support this message over 9000%, which is to say I am enthusiastic about it.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:46 PM
2

I'm wracking my brain to find it in a non-sexist way. Maybe I'm just short on sleep, but it's basically pure sexism.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:44 PM
5

I saw somewhere that that whole left vs right brain school of thought came from one debunked study that was cross referenced and cited everywhere until it looked like it was well researched. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure it's a discarded theory.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:42 PM
2

"Those tv shows" as in faux news.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:41 PM
2

This was 3 years ago now, so as we type my daughter sleeps only 10 feet away. Money is tight, but we do what we can and she is going to get a good life. Good luck in your struggles, feel free to PM me if you need to talk. I'm not sure what insights into your situation I can give (I'm in Western Canada) but having someone who understands can be really pivotal.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:54 PM
2

They refused to name the accuser, and since I was never brought to trial, I don't have legal standing. They destroyed what my life was, permanently harmed my child(attachment issues), forced me to miss my child's first steps, and I have never seen justice, and it is doubtful I ever will. That's why I'm here.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:40 PM
1

Missing the point again? You must harvest downvotes as a crop. I'm done with your trolling. Go back under your bridge.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:25 PM
2

After trashing my apartment(12 hours+ to clean up while I had to console my wife as we both cried because they took my daughter) then they looked through my computers, phones, (and my XBOX of all things) for 9 months. There was absolutely no evidence suggesting I did that, because I didn't do that, and so they physically destroyed my computers and then returned them. I still have an unuseable computer in my closet with the motherboard completely ripped from the case, and bent to shit. They said …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:17 PM
2

I am proud of you too. I was once falsely accused of production and distribution of child pornography, and so I know approximately what is going on with your family. It's not pretty.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:05 PM
1

Please do not advocate for violence. If you must, take it somewhere that is not this place. We have enough to deal with as we are called hateful bigots from all sides. We don't need SRS linking to you advocating violence against a mother fighting to get her child back. Even if she is a cunt.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:02 PM
2

I hope your real life situation turns out to be equally positive in the short term. Your cousin is in a hell of a mess and you guys seem to be handling it like pros. Calm, non-retaliatory, mindful.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:57 AM
2

"I might be wrong! Stop wasting my time." Lol what a sap.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:16 AM
2

Please remember that impression if/when you see/hear people calling us hateful people who want to take away women's rights. A few groups have decided to slander the whole of us.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:06 AM
0

We both agree there, but you're making a straw man about OP's views. There's a higher amount that would appreciate a kind gesture for 'ugly people' than there are for 'pretty people,' because ugly people have much less of the kind treatment that pretty people enjoy. Good job continuing to obfuscate the point of the post, though.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:34 AM
4

Well your argument is wrong and a logical fallacy. So I will ridicule it.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:56 PM
10

Which people? The trolls who are feminists? Please elaborate. EDIT: When did I say ALL pretty people are dicks? Oh I didn't? So I guess you're strawman-ing again immediately after getting called out over a straw man?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:27 PM
8

This is all the feminist trolls have nowadays. Take one example of an anecdote and immediately assume the most extreme position possibly put forth by their opponents as their straw man. Nobody said attractive women ALWAYS have easy lives. He said that beautiful people have better lives than ugly people, on average. Logical fallacies abound.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:23 PM
7

Hey. You. Fuck yeah, good job being awesome man. That is all.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:28 AM
5

Yes, it's provably frame by frame stolen from other youtubers with absolutely no attribution or recognition. If she does follow through with her kickstarter plan, she'll eventually release it all for sale as educational videos. If/when she does so, it'll be illegal due to the terms of use regarding plagiarism.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:10 AM
6

From feminists? To say that everything we do be the purest signs of the antichrist and is serving only to advance the patriarchy's shadow cabal power that benefits all men and harms all women.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 11:21 PM
3

There's no signs afterwards when you put a gun to your head and don't pull the trigger. There's signs when you stopped eating pills before a lethal dose. There's a reason why there's a gap, but I don't think we agree on why the gap is there.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:22 AM
1

To be fair, in the case of child molestation or child pornography, there is a high level of risk. However I think they should have kept her in my family for sure.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:53 AM
3

Essentially, My wife and I allowed someone to move in with us, and they decided they wanted me gone so they could take my place in the family. Right before the raid came, he was telling his girlfriend they should leave and go do something. They came and took me shirtless (it's Canada and I didn't get anything to cover myself for hours, I was blue by the time they gave me this shitty prison blanket) and they grabbed us and TRASHED my apartment. EVERYTHING ripped off the walls, laying on the floor…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 07:37 AM
2

Alright, I'll mark your reply as unread and I'll edit this post after my kid goes to bed with the full story. Alternatively, you can reply to it, and then when I post the full story, I'll reply to that post, and you can get notified.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:54 AM
2

You want me to give you the whole story? I'm about to go pick my Kid up from the school bus, but I mean, this is /r/MensRights, so it's the place for the story if you want me to. I can type it out after I get back.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 09:54 PM
10

I feel you man, I honestly do know how this is. I'm a father, and I was accused of producing and distributing child pornography with my own daughter, then less than 2 years old. I sincerely hope you get justice my friend.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:46 AM
1

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public, and this is why you do not need consent to record someone on the street.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:37 AM
15

This is significantly less effective. The last one had information on it. This has verbal diarrhea, by which I mean you can't make anything out without some effort. Maybe word wrap the text and don't block out huge portions with solid black (unless you reverse text color to allow for more visibility). That'd make it readable since word wrap is clearly superior to just dismembering sentences and laying their husks into the shape of a lady. EDIT: Forgot to mention that I support you. You're my bro…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:14 AM
-1

Exactly why I've decided to stop responding to him. All we can do is report and ignore. Whole bunch of lowest common denominator attacks and vociferous hate without substance. He's like if fox news made a reddit account, even his name is almost a racial epithet.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 12:06 PM
0

I think he's just overly zealous, or was abused himself, and it's a sore spot, but this is purely blind speculation. I don't think he's a troll because of his account's karma rating. Then again, this could be an armchair troll that does it only on weekends. EDIT: I also suggest reporting him as I have. Extremely abusive language such as he has shown should warrant a deletion.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:44 AM
-1

I'm supporting myself, not him, you foul mouthed bully. I said move the article to a relevant space. Not all these lies you keep spouting. This is the last reply I'm sparing a fact-averse troll like you.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:42 AM
2

When did I say stop? I said move it.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:41 AM
5

I explicitly stated the opposite.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:33 AM
6

Nice straw man. I didn't say we shouldn't protect him, I didn't say it was a fun time, I didn't say it wasn't dangerous. What I did say was critical of you, and now you're butthurt. You know you're wrong, and so now you gotta go with insults to feel better than a stranger on the internet. This should never have happened, and the kid deserves better. But this is not helping change policy, or raise awareness of MEN'S issues, and as such belongs in another board where there are people dedicated to …
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:30 AM
2

They do, but he wasn't targeted for being a ten year old BOY, he was targeted for being a 10 YEAR OLD boy.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:18 AM
15

I'm gonna have to disagree with you. This boy wasn't targeted for being a boy. He was targeted for being the child of an abuser. That makes this a children's rights issue, not a men's rights issue. It is not a matter of race if a mother did this to her son if they were both black. "They're black. Black. Rights. Black's rights." Your heart's in the right place, but this isn't men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:17 AM
0

The /s tag is to indicate sarcasm. I use it to show I'm being sarcastic when you can't hear my intonations. I appreciate your willingness to source the truth, though!
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:31 PM
3

Keep asking, we know you're at a loss in many aspects, such as your humanity, judging by your bigotry. See if it doesn't make the joke even more funny.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:14 AM
-3

I would totally defend a rape victim under normal circumstances. I am extremely unfond of this particular fuckup, and do not wish something as traumatic as rape on him, but I could not care any less about him. Poor multimillionaire worshiped by throngs of people willing to pay money just to see him. Poor guy, he TOTALLY deserves just as much sympathy as regular people who are raped, or orphans, or whatever else. Fuck him.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:46 AM
3

This was absolutely perfect.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 10:09 PM
2

My mother's German Shepard has killed a mouse and ptarmigan in the maybe 3 dozen walks I've given him. I think it's an artifact of dying if you don't kill, as an animal(at least in the wild).
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:33 PM
2

I agree, feminists should accept the consequences for the slander of men by feminists. If we're mad, that's fine, there's no laws being broken. Except slander.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:32 PM
4

Men can't be preyed upon, they have agency. /s
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:12 PM
1

After checking, you're right, they don't have a soft mouth. My bad. As far as breeding for fighting, I disagree. I have had several dogs around strange pit bulls, and they aren't more willing to fight than another breed, and certainly not as aggressive as a Chihuahua. The individual dog needs to be taught to fight, and although the breed may make it easier to do so, it is not inherent in them to begin fighting. That would mean that they would never be able to be kenneled with another dog.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:54 PM
0

Yep, That sentence is why I amended my comment. Of course, it appears my first instinct was correct anyway, as the update on the website states, in part, as follows: "The court didn’t believe that he was asleep and found it proven that he was aware of and accepted it when the two women performed oral sex on him. The extent he didn’t consider the surroundings and where this took place (in public) were due to his self-inflicted intoxicated state the court wrote." All I'm saying is that it isn't a …
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:18 PM
1

Exactly. Plus, like any dog, they will protect you if the time comes, and a pit bull can certainly defend my child from real monsters as well as the ones under the bed :3
/r/MensRights10/10/13 07:22 AM
4

Now I'm abusive? That escalated quickly. So it's abusive to criticize? It's funny how freedom of speech is good sometimes and bad other times.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:17 AM
-3

He's CLAIMING he doesn't recall, and has a $1000 incentive to continue to not recall. This is a poor example of rape, I'd say. EDIT: It didn't make clear that he was difficult to rouse, and that he was passed out. My mistake.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:45 AM
18

I agree totally, the well funded and networked feminist groups that are already represented in the media have made us have a bad image problem by pretending all we do is hate feminists and never reporting on the positive things we try. We totally do have an image problem, but it doesn't stem from this movement: it's from the counter-movement, feminism.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:44 AM
6

I would like to mention that Pit bulls are less likely to be violent than the chihuahua, and are so gentle and kind that up until the 1950s they were called the 'nanny dog' in america. So nurturing and gentle are these dogs that if you had a kid, it was common sense that you should get a pit bull. They also have something called a "soft mouth" because they are so gentle they can carry an egg without breaking it. All I'm saying is that your kennel analogy was a bit lacking, although clearly under…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:23 AM
1

Goes both ways, sweetie. Stop making us mad, and you won't have so many mad people.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:15 AM
17

It's already being takes seriously. Hundreds of thousands of dollars of funding serious. Permanent positions in universities serious.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:03 PM
1

I only call them poor based on the downvotes. Comedy is really in the mind of the beholder, as it were.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:01 PM
1

If you put a /j for joke, or /s for sarcasm, then your poor jokes can't be used against us by brigading feminists, and people like me who can't hear intonation over the text on the internet won't bug you about it.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:10 PM
1

You can't change your sexual orientation. Brainwashing does not rewire your brain, it merely programs it.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:07 AM
0

Chinese isn't a race, hombre.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 12:04 AM
1

There are plenty of reasons not to believe in god that are terrible. For some people, it's because they're mad. That's stupid. For some people they don't believe in god because they think it isn't compatible with their illuminati beliefs. There's plenty of bad reasons to not believe, the good reasons revolve around logic and the complete absence of any positive evidence. Another one is that the jews/jesusfans/muslims think god has specific properties that are mutually exclusive and therefore is …
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:30 PM
1

I can empathize with the "there's absolutely no evidence for a god," and also with having looked, but you said you can't believe in god because women have multiple orgasms. Surely you agree that is a poor reason to not believe.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:27 PM
2

He also constantly professes his own biases and always mentions to take those into account. How many times has he mentioned that we live in a bubble made up of the people we speak to, and the media we view? I agree TYT ain't perfect but it's better than any other news source I can think of. Cable news is all bought lock and key.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:35 AM
5

As an atheist, that's a really poor reason to not believe in god.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:33 AM
3

Felicia day is totally fine.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:55 PM
0

I agree the poster is useless. However, in my personal experience, these things get posted just anywhere. There's one similar on the church I live next to- not much of a prostitution gangbang hub. Also there's no priests there, just a pastor, so the altar boys should be safe. I make a sarcastic comment about a pastor and I go check facebook and I find this: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/09/11/iowa-youth-pastor-rapes-boys-to-cure-them-of-homosexuality-wont-spend-one-day-in-prison/
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:02 PM
11

SRS doesn't have to follow the rules.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:54 PM
1

If you read the OP's comments, it was not near a club or hotel.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:47 PM
2

No, your numbers (91+11=102) actually imply that there is a sexism based wage gap, but it favors women and discriminates against men. Of course, 2% is within reasonable margin of error.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:06 AM
1

They're wrong there, I'll give you that.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:40 AM
2

I agree. They seem to assume that the pussy pass exempts them from first impressions and from the judgement of others. And it's misogyny when they aren't treated as though they are highly respected. However the hypocrisy, despite being hilarious, can't really be stopped in this case until they see it for themselves. In the hope they do eventually have that revelation, I support future slut walks.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:31 AM
3

I didn't intend that, and you are right. I'm just putting it in the framing as how they view it to give them the benefit of the doubt regarding their motivations and intentions. That's what they're there for, regardless of efficacy etc. That's what the demonstrations is about. Also, there are still people, frequently conservative evangelicals, who think that a woman is indeed 'asking for it.' The popularization of freedom of toplessness etc. is directly opposed to those people, and I oppose that…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:12 AM
6

Men can't be raped, silly. /s
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:58 PM
7

The walk itself I have no problem with, but I agree that they use it as a soapbox/echo chamber. That I have issues with.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:00 PM
9

What's so wrong with slut walk? I'm pretty active on /r/mensrights, but I don't see much issue with it. They deserve to dress however they want without being raped. It's a bit ham fisted, but there's scantily clad ladies, so the message gets across.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:38 PM
5

No, quotas force you to not hire the best applicants. If the NAACP had a 40% white quota, would that help? Or would the NAACP benefit from having people who know what it's like to be black? Same here, they're forcing companies to hire not the best, most logical choices, but someone else instead. Women are great at business, so are men. But forcing hiring to be done from a smaller pool of applicants at least 40% of the time is wrong.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:13 PM
2

I'm raising a daughter, so I'm less qualified to answer that then you. I suggest Mr Rogers recordings and lots of roughhousing.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:20 PM
3

And that is the million dollar question.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 09:42 AM
14

No, this is simply wrong. Just because women make a show of it and you notice it biases this(intentionally or not, doesn't matter in this case). There's no spectacle when you put a gun to your head in private and don't pull the trigger. Male suicide is vastly underestimated as a problem.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 08:01 AM
38

You realize that that was satire? Or are you just ignorant? It was an allegory to the rape issues men face wherein feminists say that women would never falsely report abuse or rape. Fuck you and your reflexive self-righteous ignorance.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:11 PM
1

It does to the kind of woman who would care about the job that much.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 08:39 PM
1

It DOES have bearing. If you don't consent to sex with a janitor, and then you are misled into it, it's exactly the same as your argument.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:47 AM
1

Yes, and using it feeds their persecution complex and gets them funding. Also it lumps you in with a sack of shit.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:25 PM
15

I approve. That's my stance as well, I had delusions about feminism, now I realize that there's much deception in their words about equality. I also suspect it's a supremacist movement now, at least in a very active schism. Edit: I accidentally a gender supposition somehow.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:53 PM
4

Mentally ill people are legitimately oppressed, and curiously they also have no huge government funded platform to form laws with. Contrast: feminism...
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:36 AM
2

It helps when you try to denigrate the group from the inside instead of posting more of what you want to see.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:28 AM
2

Look at that mugshot... her eyes are so scary. She's not right in the head.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:53 AM
1

Please don't use "Feminazis." That word was made by Rush Limbaugh, and there's nothing good to gain from being lumped in with that filth.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:55 AM
2

It was public though. Now there's a record showing how unreasonable the people who oppose us are, and how reasonable we are. People can identify extremists, OP is just making it easy by making a permanent, public record of the bigotry of our opponents. This helps the moderates who are on the fence to accept our point of view, and it also might shake the faith of the less zealous feminists/put someone on the fence when they had before been on one side.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:02 AM
4

Pls respond
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:59 AM
3

Well, you're the one being laughed at, according to up/down votes. If KRosen's a clown, you're the town fool playing Jester.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:53 PM
7

Google feministing. It's a thing, but perhaps not what you might wish.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:47 PM
2

... I guess this is how religious people feel when I blaspheme.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:23 AM
3

Wait a second, let me get this straight. They attacked Bill Nye the Science Guy? May I see the source to this please? I do not question that it is occurring, I wish to examine the evidence. Due to the seriousness of insulting Bill Nye (one of my personal heroes) I will give them the benefit of the doubt. If this is as fake as a feminist accusing people of shit like this normally is (meaning at least 50% chance of lie) then you may next hear of me when the manhunt starts.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:19 PM
7

Regarding that gap you mentioned, I would like to mention that the gender wage gap myth has been disproved since 1981. There are indeed gaps, and I am not saying women face no discrimination. But what feminism claims is very often laughably false. You may not find this as striking as I, because I have some weird fetish for science, but when feminism cites "scientific" papers written by feminists, it gets sketchy. You go and look at their methodology, and they openly, brazenly state that before a…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:00 AM
6

In a parallel universe, a feminist read this and suffered a stroke. "BUT WUT?! Shitlords dont think about equa- begins flailing in seisure and bites tongue off"
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:35 AM
2

IUD stands for IntraUteran Device. If a man has one in his body, he needs it removed really fast.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:57 AM
0

Except to make himself clearly and directly apparent to everyone at the same time so that we'd stop going to hell.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:55 AM
1

Planet Misogyny? Really?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 01:28 AM
-3

Feminism IS ridiculous, they are the proof of it, not working to prove it. This is just how they are. It's crazy how everyone seems to be in a secret society to discredit feminism, and feminism never acts bad in any way. Why don't you apply occam's razor, and accept that you might be wrong.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 07:38 AM
1

It's true that I'm sitting naked in a chair as I type this.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:09 AM
16

You realize that women were not exactly slaves for most of history... men were just as oppressed as women. It's a woman's job historically to do the housework etc, and that's oppression, but the men had to go risk death to support their wife. That's oppression too. If you look throughout history, women weren't as undervalued as you may think, and certainly weren't systematically oppressed very much more than men were. Don't get me wrong, I'm 100% behind 'women's liberation/personhood' but it's j…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:52 PM
2

The people who are 'better' at speech are the ones who change things. In this case the wall of nonstop chat will only convince the choir, and the people who are on the fence can be won over by being the only voice in the room with well structured persuasion. I'm gonna be a little controversial here, but forget about all the bad shit Hitler did for a second. When hitler was at his peak of power, it is because of his physical presence and charisma. When he chose to, he could make friends easily- C…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 07:36 AM
1

I can see the comment, if that helps. I don't know if that's indicative of anything, but I don't know why you'd ask me otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 06:12 AM
2

Leading as a 'great leader' is inherently political and requires that you are very clear and very careful with your words so that you have as much of an advantage as possible. Leading as a millitary commander requires you to be so good at talking that you convince another human being to go fight someone they don't know and may have never met TO THE DEATH. It's extremely hard to do, and is the reason why morale is a major factor in every battle humans have ever fought. Further back in history, if…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 05:58 AM
5

This is why all the great leaders, negotiators, and generals from history all tended to be women.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:52 AM
3

A different redditor posed the question, I was just curious.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:46 AM
2

How does that tell you anything? That removes upvotes but does not describe a mechanism by which to know if you have been shadowbanned.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:22 AM
7

They removed 'the patriarchy' and now they're using it's shadow to justify attacking and restricting others. That's why. If feminists actually wanted equality, they wouldn't be doing what they are doing. That's why we don't like them. It's a business now, there's money involved, and the institution of feminism would wither as they had less problems to solve. They need to keep making shit up, because unless there's a 'patriarchy' then they don't have the same funding as if they acknowledged that …
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:15 AM
2

I got a vasectomy and there's no scar at all.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:23 AM
4

My ordeal is over, and I luckily came out on top. There's a little permanent damage, but overall my quality of life is roughly back to normal. I appreciate the support, but OP most certainly deserves and needs it more than I do at this point.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:26 AM
32

Bro, I was accused of child pornography production and distribution, and they took all my computers, phones, any electronic devices, TRASHED my apartment looking for hidden discs or drugs, then they took my daughter and tossed me in lockup. I know exactly how you feel. It was hell and lasted almost a whole year. Don't give up. Your child is worth it. Right now my five year old is playing lego on the other side of my desk, and humming "it ain't gonna rain no more" by the guy who made "the cat cam…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:43 PM
5

I had the most perfect image of this pair of old ladies who wisely stopped preaching to me a while back wearing capes and showing up at birthday parties to 'shut that whole thing down.'
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:19 AM
3

Brother, This is going to hurt. I'm very sorry to have to say this to you. Neither of those kids are yours, you have to leave for everyone's sake, including theirs. Sign nothing. Record Everything. Go get evidence of her infidelity, even if it hurts you, but make sure she does it on something you own, and never go anywhere online to get evidence you couldn't get otherwise such as a phone/her private messages. I don't know how YOUR pain is, but I can imagine. I was accused of manufacturing child …
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:12 AM
6

Super Jehovah's Witness?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:48 AM
11

Wow, that is amazing. I love catching people in their own lies with logic and math. It really warms my heart. This one's going in the armoury.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:13 AM
13

In the comments to that post there is a link to another woman who was jailed after 11 false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:03 AM
2

I WAS a feminist, then I noticed that there were some things wrong... and I came to this conclusion. It's totally fair for you to suggest that I should consider that I'm wrong, but that was my position, and I saw the evidence and changed. I didn't start at this position. As far as definitions, the definition you offer, while I'm confident it's correct inasmuch that that definition is there, I would contend that it is obsolete, and referring to an older form of feminism, the first wave that actua…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:13 AM
3

I think you are misunderstanding me. Feminism is not egalitarianism, it is sexism, and your definition is wrong. Women's liberation etc, I can endorse that. But today's feminism is not even based off scientific principals, and every bit of research they do is pre-assuming women are victims, and men are a secret cabal of patriarchal power. The feminists might SAY they're for equal rights, but their ACTIONS speak louder than words. If feminism is for equality, why do they fight against men's equal…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:56 AM
8

The majority aren't males. It's 50/50.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:43 PM
3

Why would you come here and say these things? Feminism is indeed one of the main factors here, and it is most assuredly a huge source of misandry. Every man should be an egalitarian, and women too. Fuck feminism, it's a female supremacy group. If you want to spread this stuff, this is only going to rile us up, not convert us. Do it somewhere else, please.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:32 PM
2

I'm sorry too, because the system failed them.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:28 PM
1

So you're asserting she's not stupid, and as evidence you present... she uses the logical fallacy "argument from ignorance?" Seems flimsy.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:39 AM
1

EDIT- posted to wrong comment. My bad.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:38 AM
0

NO. How fucking dare you. OUR WHOLE ISSUE is that we are not being treated fairly as people. You want us to address this by taking away the autonomy of other people? And worse, abortion rate is not affected by legality, only the safeness of the abortions is affected. Asserting that we should violate another group's human rights as strike back for their bigotry makes you exactly like them. And getting women to die because the drano and coathangers forced into her uterus in a back alley by an immi…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:36 AM
1

I would like to point out, in america, that women frequently dno not have much bodily autonomy inasmuch that their right to abortion is marginalized or obfuscated constantly by the conservative religious right. I would not say that goal is met, especially when the people's elected reps constantly act on legislation to suppress planned parenthood etc.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:27 AM
2

What? Feminists do that constantly, how could you possibly defend that nobody's ever said that? It's their official position.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:21 AM
4

Frightening women supports the feminist movement by tricking them into thinking they are victims, oppressed, in danger, and that men are the root of that. The more scared feminists are, the more they are willing to do. The same way that the westboro baptist church is scared of god destroying earth due to gays, and so they are hyper extreme- feminists to a less-loathesome and usually(WBC are like all lawyers and don't commit felonious acts like we've seen feminists do to suppress MRAs) less-extre…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:09 AM
7

As a parent, I can assure you that if you're changing a boy infant's diaper, you will have to spend no more time, and even more likely, a lot more time cleaning it, because there's guaranteed going to be shit and piss all over it, and not cleaning it gives them thrush. You Do Not Want your kid to have thrush. If you cut the penis, the same shit and piss will be in the wound constantly, you have to change bandages constantly to prevent infections that intact babies are not vulnerable to, because …
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:41 AM
5

I live in Penticton, BC, Canada. It is a town of roughly 33K people, primarily seniors as this place is breathtakingly beautiful, and very safe since there's no weird gun obsession up here. We have a great hospital. A baby boy died because of his circumcision preformed by a doctor in a hospital (we only have one type of hospital up here- government owned and universally insured). They rushed him to the state-of-the-art BC Children's hospital in Vancouver by emergency medivac, but he still died. …
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:33 AM
0

You don't see a connection between feminists frequent reaction of vitriol towards dissenting viewpoints, regardless of validity, and feminism? So you're saying that feminists' actions as a group are not 'connected' to that group that unifies, indoctrinates, and mobilizes them? Cause I'm having difficulty seeing how that's logically defensible as a position. I'm not completely sober, so say if I'm missing something, but it seems like a similar, although less rigid and violent, analogy would be yo…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:21 AM
4

The universal reaction from feminist fundies to any form of dissent from their self interest.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:54 PM
2

We don't need to insult them as we dismiss them. Please do these things separately. It's just giving their victim complex more ammo.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:16 AM
4

That's laughable! Men don't need any more privileges, that's so sexist. /s
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:24 PM
3

I support this
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:22 PM
12

Religious circumcision is assault! But it's totally ok to assault infant males, just not females. EQUALITY!
/r/MensRights30/06/13 12:03 PM
18

Welcome to feminism.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:59 PM
2

I am so happy for this man! Congratulations!
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:24 PM
1

Men can't be raped though, so you're wrong. /s
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:38 PM
3

I mostly agree with you, but it would be hilarious when that caveman trounces the whole cabal. Put all the barriers against him, and then, with all the qualities of a complete incompetent, destroys them. ~~Irony.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:43 AM
3

you broke your freakishly long and thin penis into over a dozen segments and laid them in parallel lines between your disembodied testicles and glans? This emoticon isn't very intuitive, is what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:03 AM
38

They can. It's 'hostile.'
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:42 PM
6

Or the middle east... or india etc.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 09:48 AM
2

I'm almost completely sure it was Newt.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 01:10 AM
7

I only commented because I hadn't yet seen that you're a troll. Her 'perceived fear' does not excuse anything, and is not legitimate. If he had made any kind of threats, maybe she would be justified. But he didn't. Go find a bridge to hide under.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:02 PM
6

Evidence? Such as the video you're in a thread that is dedicated to discussing? She makes some shit up, and he could have been attacked because she claimed he was attacking her. Are you really so blind?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:16 PM
12

The man cycling legally is having mental problems for... insisting a crazy, slanderous bitch obey traffic laws?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:14 PM
5

All the while hypocrites such as Newt gingrich are cheating on their wife who's dying from cancer and simultaneously calling clinton's infidelity the utmost sin. America needs to get it's shit together.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:31 PM
1

I'm against the death penalty because you can never tell if you have the right person... but we have essentially nothing to doubt at all in this. I would prefer she lives her life til' she dies of old age, rotting in a cell, but if they kill her... I'm ok with this.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:46 AM
6

Calling someone a pedophile for disagreeing is called slander.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:56 AM
1

Very well articulated and presented quite cleanly. My only compunction is that there's no references to factual sources in the speech itself.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:11 AM
-1

I can agree on that.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:57 PM
-8

Taking a risk doesn't mean you don't understand consequences. It's not like they think it's a risk if you can't understand that what you are doing has ramifications. Also, humans are hard wired for risk vs reward scenarios, at any age, even after puberty. Shocking, I know. If you have an objection, you'll need to do better than "hrmmmm." Just because you take risks, doesn't mean you can't understand that if you fail you're fucked in some situations. Additionally, the REAL reason insurance costs …
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:09 PM
-2

The bible belt is where they are literally trying to train the christian taliban. Watch 'Jesus Camp,' where they document real people seriously indoctrinating young kids to pray to George W Bush. They talk about how the muslims have people willing to die for Islam, and they believe that the only way to not 'lose to Islam' is to brainwash kids. They want to raise them to lay down their life for christian mythology. I am not exaggerating at all. If you're not from the area, it's easy to not realiz…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:00 PM
-4

Tell that to the bible belt. Hell, I'm in Canada, and not in the crazy conservative areas, and I still ended up dating a baptist with a family that had the most repressive attitudes toward... well everything, actually. North America is where all the prudes went when they felt that Europe was too full of sin. Sadly, the conservatives are still thick here, and they'd rather you know absolutely nothing about sex and get aids while pregnant than teach you how to put on a condom. I wish it was as eas…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:46 PM
-10

Did I say it was fully formed? No, actually. I said that they identified the age at which most (51%+) people are capable of making decisions with full knowledge of the ramifications. Also, there is no need to be so hostile, this is the internet and you are taking it way too seriously. Why do you need to be so vitriolic? I'm not the one fucking teenagers, so there's no need to be mad at me(I am not implying you are, for the record). Please stop giving feminists good examples of actual MRAs being …
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:42 PM
3

Science has shown that most 15 year olds are capable of making entirely rational, fully informed decisions. I assert that because of this, the age of consent should be 16, but with provisions that allow for similar-age couples to not qualify as statutory rapists ie. 15+14 year old couples/ 15+17 year old couples are close enough that neither hold sufficient leverage over each other for the law to impose statutory rape charges every time. This allows for the majority of people to reach the 'age o…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 09:50 AM
19

Fuck I'm an idiot sometimes.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 12:49 AM
-2

Sweden's always gonna have an economy with other nation's wealthy people hiding all their money there.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 12:22 AM
26

You're right, it shouldn't matter. But it does.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:52 PM
7

Some will hate on you. But they are the few, and I believe I speak for the men's rights group at large when I say "You are welcome here." It's weird to say, but I know life can be rough for people in your situation, always treated like an outsider. If you want to chat about whatever, I'm up for it. Send me a PM if you want to talk. Or don't. Either way, Welcome Aboard.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:51 AM
9

This is some great ammo I'm putting in my arsenal. That's an undeniable reason why it should be much more commonly viewed as acceptable. You deserve more than your 11 upvotes.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:28 AM
3

If she honestly thinks that she is being purposefully intimidated by men If this is the case, I don't think she should 'deal with it,' she should call the cops. Then they should laugh in her face, and she'll get a cold splash of reality.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:47 AM
4

Japan has a culture of sexually attacking women on these super-crowded trains, and it's important to have a separate car for women in this situation, because they're in legitimate danger.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:44 AM
44

Everyone knows women just "lighten up" when they get discriminated against, so you should too! Oh, wait.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:18 AM
1

It would be appropriate at any man-hating event. Wouldn't be right, but appropriate, sure.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:12 AM
5

Feminism =/= gender equality. Feminists can believe all those things.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:43 AM
1

That's not what you claimed before. You can go and read it. I can agree that they have not met the burden of proof, though, otherwise I'd be in their camp. They get their irrationalities because of the insularity and dogmatic conditioning that everyone is out to get them and so they trust what the in group feeds them. It's rational but not correct.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:35 AM
1

No, I'm saying that their irrationality shall be their undoing, because the path to victory lies through not reverting to their slander and remaining factual, letting them get too worked up and step over some lines. I'm saying that plenty of feminists believe what they are saying is true because their social bubble all purport it to be true like dogma. I'm just objecting to the assertion that feminism has never been based in rationality at any point. Because it's counter-intuitive to lie.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:10 AM
1

The truth is how you change minds, otherwise they will see you as putting on a shell of falsities, because you will be. You even just admitted it. Feminism has almost all the advantages right now. Money, politicians, literature and more, and we all know they are excellent slanderers. Can your laughable "razzle dazzle" dig you out from under the smears when they have many to your few? You will be overrun, and have only your selves to blame when "men's rights" actually has a legit reason to be ass…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:59 AM
1

I see what you're saying, this whole time I was trying to be intellectually honest, and I didn't realize that you are just placing a facade of ignorance because you think somehow, a scorekeeper somewhere will deduct some 'points,' which I must assume are valuable, because otherwise I don't have any motivation to care about them at all. I don't give a shit about points. I care about intellectual honesty. My bad, I mistook your strange debate strategy for actual belief that somehow an organization…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 12:56 AM
-1

Because they need victimhood in order to advance their agenda. I guarantee that either men are completely incompetent, or feminism has spent a lot of time rationally thinking out methods of advertisement and ways to redefine rape to make them seem like it will effect 1 in 2 women. They lie about that shit, but they do it rationally to push their agenda. As an example: fox news. Not honest, not factual, not credible. But despite being terrible people, they still deliver their propaganda in a rati…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:00 PM
1

No, you don't understand a strawman, apparently. A strawman is if I created a falsehood to attack, and claimed you held that position. Feminism, whether or not the individuals that make it up are complicit hypocrites does not change the fact that wanting equals to be treated as equal is rational. Your claim is that it has never had rationality, must therefore assert that every single idiom, position, mode of operation, activity, etc. of feminism is entirely irrational. Feminism, while it rarely …
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:56 PM
1

YOU PROVED THAT WE ARE EITHER IGNORANT OR HYPOCRITES. OBVIOUSLY YOUR SEXISM KNOWS NO BOUNDS /s
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:43 PM
-5

At that point, military authorities who have more understanding of combat and the conditions of war decided that women were incapable of being useful as a combatant. Introducing an incompetent soldier to a professional military endangers lives, and is essentially weakening your military power on purpose. Regardless of women's combat effectiveness, when the most informed and experienced members of the military contend that you would be crippling your military, you should listen. Saying they aren'…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:03 PM
8

With even a nominal effort searching on google, you can find that 'Dog' isn't such a bro.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:41 PM
5

The feminist movement started because of women's suffrage and the events surrounding it. Building off that movement(when they most certainly hadn't gotten their due yet) is not what I would call irrational.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:47 PM
-1

I get aroused from deep tissue massage, and I get off on pain sometimes. You're on the internet, you should know better than this. If you can imagine it, someone has that fetish.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:45 PM
2

What? "Has never been a rational movement" is fucking retarded, you don't think women's sufferage was rational? How can you possibly defend the position that the original concept of treating women as though they were equal is irrational? I'm no feminist zealot, but that's bigoted right there. Do the men's rights movement a big favor and stop saying shit like this that both harms us and empowers them. If you can't keep yourself from saying some people don't deserve equal rights then please get th…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:33 PM
2

I wasn't able to find an official source, but it appears you're right. If the business is small enough, they are legally allowed to be bigoted. That's fucking amazing.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 02:06 AM
1

Do you have a design concept? If you had a lapel pin style microphone, but placed on the inside of the cuff, next to the throat, and designed a noise cancelling shell to cover the directions not covered by the throat.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 02:04 AM
3

Recently, I went to get my first massage at a friend's house. She was having a 'fuckerware' party and there were two masseuses. The first was a middle aged, slightly out of shape, balding man, and the other was a decently attractive, chubby brunette in her 30s-40s(I am a bad judge of age). My natural inclination was the woman, naturally, but after only a couple minutes it was very apparent that she wasn't strong enough to properly deal with my muscle density. I thought to myself "It's not like h…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:43 AM
2

/r/bdsm
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:09 AM
1

Sometimes it's as easy as speaking fast, muffled, and quietly: "this conversation's being recordedHEY THERE I JUST WANTED TO TALK ABOUT SUBMITTING A RESUME!" All you need to do is state it one time, you don't need to admit what you said after you say it. Also, in many states, only one party in the conversation need know recording is taking place.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:01 AM
5

Discriminating solely on gender is illegal. You can't refuse women based only on their gender.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:57 PM
2

Men buy into the myth that men can't be raped because if you think it is possible to rape a man, that means you believe that you are weak enough to be overcome and raped. Weakness is the thing that men are the most vicious about because if you convince others of a sexual rival's weakness then he is less of a threat to your ability to mate. If you contend that men are impervious to rape, you assert that you are much too powerful for rape to be imaginable. Since power is sexually attractive, this …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:31 PM
20

No, she could keep the baby then. That's his child growing up without a dad. That's him being a wage-garnished subsistence slave for 18+ years. Regardless of what is just, the law is with the woman in this, and you're saying that since she violated his trust, he should just become her slave for 18 years? Yeah, no.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:17 AM
31

No! Op was put into a hard place BY a douchebag, and had his hand forced into some regrettable and avoidable self defense tactics. He did this honourably, considering some people would poison or beat a liar to protect themself.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:02 AM
4

I would argue that that's an artificial opinion generated by feminism's victimization-farming.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 08:08 PM
18

No, there are women in the military more than capable. But there should be no pussy passes 'because equality'. The bar is set to ensure combat effectiveness, and lowering the bar is a lethal mistake. That woman who can't carry the man next to her, and both their gear is a combat disadvantage and could end up with a lot of people dead. This being said, there are women in the military who can call down the whirlwind, but women are physiologically less likely to pass the benchmark. That doesn't mak…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:42 PM
3

I don't think you could make a convincing argument against this being centered around giving women a win. This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard in sports.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:43 PM
18

It's not unfair to let a competitor start 18 minutes ahead? Wow. I'm legitimately speechless.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:11 AM
3

Canada. In thorough checks it shows what you were arrested for and why. If I'm wrong someone tell me, but I'm pretty sure.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 06:06 AM
24

Yep. It's one of the few time I would envy the US legal code. It's reprehensible, and I consider it fraud.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 02:40 AM
52

I was accused of this, but the police refused to let me know who the accuser was. To this day, I do not know, and it ruined almost a year of my life. It'll be on my criminal background checks til I die that I was arrested for possession and production of child porn. What's worse is that I'm a father, and my child was 1 year old. She has attachment and abandonment issues now.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:05 AM
4

I heard about girlwriteswhat from an unrelated link here, and I'm so happy she's on our side. Smart, and can get around the self-interest hurdle that we have to climb to be heard.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:51 AM
1

We'll have to disagree then.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 10:07 PM
5

I was just giving a rough approximation of what value would begin to represent abnormality to me. For example, the bottom 15% of any test are abnormally low, and the top 15% are abnormally high on their test scores. I didn't mean to address just the one group with that statement, I wasn't very clear.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:59 PM
3

You know abnormal can have a positive connotation too, right? Olympic athletes are abnormally good at their sport.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:45 PM
41

Dude. They are less than 30% of the population and are by definition abnormal. Now only Xenophobes, cowards, and bigots think abnormal is wrong, but those who do not identify with their born gender are abnormal. Nothing more wrong than being an albino, or having dwarfism. To be clear since you are so defensive, I expressly mean that it is not wrong or bad. But it is abnormal.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:34 AM
1

I didn't see it as a joke but I didn't think this was serious and wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt...
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:59 AM
2

Wait a second... doesn't it feel completely different? because I've had condoms break, and have sex without condoms with my wife, and have used condoms in the past. From my experience there's a very noticeable difference in sensation, is this not the case for women?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:25 AM
1

We just gave him upvotes for saying he'll become what we hate. I know it was a joke, but we all should be wary of this line of thought, that's not who we should be.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:17 AM
0

By that logic, I'm a way worse person than hitler from all the time I spend on /r/GoneWild. If every potential human has the right to life then I deserve over a billion counts of manslaughter.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:34 AM
2

The woman is being unethical, I think he's defending himself on the same level. An example is me pulling a knife on an armed attacker: they didn't play fair, so I even the field. She used disgusting entrapment, so he can deceive. As for her not falling for it, what are the consequences of him saying he loves her and wants a family, but not yet? That's not illegal.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:26 PM
1

How wise of you, this man who has been the victim of fraud for 25 years should try to send an email to his representative instead of GOING AFTER THE PERSON WHO'S BEEN ESSENTIALLY STEALING FROM HIM. Wow, ignorance.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:00 AM
2

I disagree. You haven't given any legitimate reason why he shouldn't, and this leads me to believe you're only saying this because you're anti-choice. It's a great idea and could save his life.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:34 AM
1

Yes, we are agreed.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:08 PM
4

Lots of people are better than others, I think what you mean in that nobody is intrinsically better as a human.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:23 PM
8

No one pays attention to Dr King until Malcolm X makes them. Very well said, have an upvote!
/r/MensRights09/02/13 12:32 AM
2

Yeah, my last comment wasn't entirely rational either. You're right, she was punished. And I think we both can agree that it was nowhere near justice being served.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:37 PM
1

FOR MURDER!
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:12 PM
1

Light punishment? She went free! EDIT: also im not disagreeing with you. I think you're understating it is all.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:19 AM
3

What are you talking about? The OP is commenting on the double standard. A woman kills her own mother? She's just emotionally fragile and needs support! Mental illness blinded her! A man kills his own mother? Life in prison. His mental illness is further proof that he's a danger to everyone.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:46 AM
4

From that page's comments, "TheBiboSez" says, As I understand the Social Justice theory of feminism, if Ms Mary is cis female and a feminist, then she cannot be a rape apologist. If Ms Mary is cis female and a gender-traitor MRA, then she is 25% a rape apologist and 25% a rape denialist. If Ms Mary is a trans woman, then she is 100% a rapist. If Mr Mary is a trans man, then he is 50% a rape apologist and 50% a rapist. If Mr Mary is a cis man, then he is 100% a rapist, 100% a Schrödinger’s rapist…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:36 PM
2

Or you could be smart and use this magic "telephone" invention i've been hearing about.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:05 PM
4

As a MRA, and a father, I don't see the issue here, really. They're right, it's wrong to order women to cover up while breastfeeding. Here in canada it's a crime to tell a woman to move because she's breastfeeding. It's also completely legal for women to be topless anywhere men are allowed to, because that's fair. Breastfeeding is extremely natural, and it's inherently illogical to say otherwise. EDIT: Also, are we REALLY defending David Koch? A Koch brother? They're pure evil, is this a differe…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:10 AM
22

This could get him shunned or seriously injured. A friend of mine tried this when he was younger and the ladies got their white knight friends to believe he was a bigot, and sent them off to jump him in an alley. It's ironic because they are the ones with the power but claimed discrimination.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:24 PM
2

That's asinine. There is a clear definition between the "Women deserve equal rights and freedoms, because we are people too" of the 1960s, and the hate spouting neofeminism that wants superiority, and that blocks out others and lobbies to restrict men's reproductive rights. For example, there isn't any oral contraceptive for men because the feminist lobby said men were too irresponsible to take it, and they pressured the right people.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:51 AM
10

Any sign of the wrong kind of feminism, I would argue. Women who want equality as per proper feminism are alright, versus the twisted thing mainstream feminism has become.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:47 PM
1

Herro again Virgil
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:16 AM
1

Ah, excuse the ignorance, I don't deal with 'murrican institutions as a rule.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:03 AM
1

YES, thank you.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:30 AM
1

Isn't the UCLA an organization who's purpose is to help fight injustice? It's an American organization that operates only in America, so... they'd be able to tell you since I have no experience with them, being a foreigner and all, I would imagine.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:28 AM
8

I'm canadian and wish I could help, but contact the UCLA, and they'll get shit done.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:47 PM
-7

Somehow I can't see op's story. Did he just post the header and expect us to understand the intracacies, or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter