TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Edd13Mac Archive

View 1 post and 66 comments by Edd13Mac on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Edd13Mac/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:01 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Fair point.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 08:22 PM
15

No, technically it is true. Women birth 100% of the population, so of course they birth 50% of it. They just are not including the other 50% for some odd reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 03:56 PM

I pity you.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:31 PM

Obviously I am going off of the assumption that some men and women actually work together, and make decisions together. I know for certain that the current situation at hand is not "Males don't get to choose." I know that doesn't go with the circlejerk in this subreddit, but it is a truth that needs to be recognized and understood before we start getting crazy with pitchforks and torches. Some males may not get to choose, whether because they are unaware or whatever other extenuating circumstanc…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:38 PM

But it won't make kids suffer since women realizing that they don't have the fiscal backing to raise kids without a partner & lacking the sugar daddy of big government will simply not bring children in to the world that they can't support, hence there will be no kids with which to suffer. You've got a lot more to learn about humans still.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:56 AM

But it won't make kids suffer since women realizing that they don't have the fiscal backing to raise kids without a partner & lacking the sugar daddy of big government will simply not bring children in to the world that they can't support, hence there will be no kids with which to suffer. You've got a lot to learn about humans.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:38 AM

As soon as a couple finds out ... they're expecting, the man has no say in whether or not they are having the child maybe in situations where they are not actually a couple. Or situations where the woman does not tell the man. But I know with 100% certainty that I, as a man, most certain DID have a choice, which I made with my wife, to have children. Now what I can agree to is that if a woman does not get consent from the man to be the child's father, then that man is not financially responsible…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:32 AM

So your saying If I didn't type it, then no, that isn't what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:28 AM

Yes of course I can agree with that. I just want to make sure we are not jumping the shark and swinging fully the other way with things as far as who-deserves-what. I don't want a man who wants a child have the right to force a woman to carry his child to term if she does not want to.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:05 AM

this is going to be long, TL;DR at the bottom Not that I'm agreeing with the above poster, but when it comes to having a baby, women and men cannot be treated the same, because they have fundamentally different jobs. I watched my wife go through two pregnancies back-to-back, and let me tell you how much more taxing that was on her vs. Me: She would vomit. Daily. Most often in the mornings but sometimes (like 50% chance) it would be at lunch, dinner, and/or sleeping times. She was exhausted all t…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:03 AM

People still pay to see Carlos Mencia.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/17 02:23 PM

Whoever was on top. They both were on top at some point? Or neither of them were? Whoever reports it first. They reported it at the same time? Whoever is uglier.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:44 PM

What part of what I wrote came across to you as anti-woman, and why?
/r/MensRights08/01/17 11:52 AM

Women can't even handle women fighting back.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 11:14 AM
2

Op's argument was that rape was not "as bad" as genital mutilation. Their reasoning was that "rape does not cause permanent damage while genital mutilation does. Therefore GM is worse."
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:23 AM
3

I would rather lose a large chunk of my ear.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:20 AM

So it isnt the same comparison. You are just making a false equivalence/straw man
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:05 AM

Because that is different. Lose your pinky or lose your foreskin?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:00 AM

Ok then, Ill spell it out simply for you: would you rather: be circumcised Or be raped by a man larger and angrier than yourself, though no permanent damage to your body will be received
/r/MensRights26/12/16 08:15 PM

No, rape would be a person penetrating you against your will. If we are going by the actual definition
/r/MensRights26/12/16 07:57 PM

So, OP, would you agree that hypothetically, if you had to choose between getting circumcised and being raped, you would rather be raped, right? Because "there is no permanent damage"?
/r/MensRights26/12/16 01:55 PM

For real. This kinda logic is what I expect over at /r/incels but not here. This is disgraceful.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 01:52 PM

Rape does not cause permanent damage That seems like a serious over-simplification with the intent of pushing some agenda. It comes across as disgusting to me. You and OP are attempting to compare Physical damage with Mental damage, and arbitrarily and without evidence concluding that physical harm is worse. How is this conclusion drawn? Are we to follow this over-simpliflied pathway to also conclude that depression isn't as bad as circumcision? Does it only matter when it results in suicide, be…
/r/MensRights26/12/16 01:45 PM
3

News flash Devil Pup this shit has been in the Corps since Opha Mae Johnson
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:58 AM
9

Am I the only one who noticed the dude at the end from that infinite cycle gif of black kids freaking out and one falling over?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/16 05:32 AM
8

...are you trying to argue that this guy didn't learn anything from this? As in if he were to come up to a situation like this a second time, he would react in the exact same way? I find that really difficult to believe. Unless you are trying to insult the intelligence of the white knight individual I guess...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/16 06:56 PM
4

It may be brutal, but if you came out of the other side knowing something you hadn't thought of or considered beforehand, its still a lesson.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/16 06:40 PM

My wife paid for our first date completely. She also asked me out to said date. So Im not sure where you got your "other 59%" statistic but I sure would like to see the study that reported that.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:39 PM
2

'FGC' new official acronym?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:52 AM
1

DO IT
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:47 AM

like having intentional danger zones on campus?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:46 AM
2

With cats, usually. This is reddit after all.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:04 AM

psh. And I thought they were supposed to be smart animals.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:28 AM

Ah, the equivalent of saying "Its not my job to educate you" that we hear so much from feminists/SJWs.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:46 PM
7

"I disapprove of what you say, so you should not be allowed to say it" - SJW creed
/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:05 AM
2

/r/bestof
/r/MensRights01/12/15 11:48 AM

"The soul-impaired" I would say, while holding my ginger wife's arm and my ginger son in my other. Then storm out in a huff.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:42 AM
1

0.4 seconds of shock before he decided to defend himself FTFY
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/15 08:44 PM
1

ideally yes, but realistically the propaganda is going to be there because people are people, so its best to prepare appropriately.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:17 AM

Whoa whoa whoa doesn't that cause autism?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:16 AM
57

Everything on reddit can be considered a circlejerk one way or another.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/15 01:26 AM

Put that on Tumblr. They'll implode.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:34 PM
10

well just multiply that by another negative $12 and you'll have +$144. Don't you love how math is applicable to real life situations?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 06:44 AM
-2

quite*
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:48 AM
1

The best way to read this article is to pretend it is being narrated by Captain Barbossa.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:23 AM
1

What did they do that merited a shadow ban? I'm so confused
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:36 PM
2

'Feminism' is currently a sinking ship that is only taking on water faster as more and more people are exposed to the radical crazies you find on Tumblr and in other sources of media. Most rational people are honestly sick of hearing all the rants and raves about 'feminism'. Also, your argument is a textbook slippery slope fallacy. While I understand your point being that it can happen, there is nothing to indicate that women everywhere will actually follow through with this plan, as most of the…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:21 PM
1

in countering encountering is the word you are looking for.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:52 AM
0

ah I get it now >.>
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:47 PM

can I ask why you choose to be circumcised?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:01 PM
7

Radical feminists believe any form of sexual activity involving a male or male-inspired object is rape.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:15 AM
1

If you are being serious, that's not exactly progressive or wise thinking.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 11:14 AM
1

I thought you were serious about this topic at first, not trolling. My mistake.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:42 PM
1

Justifying death is far different from justifying a medical procedure. True, it may have started as a religious practice, but at least according to the many peer-reviewed studies by various doctors around the globe, there are benefits to it. There may be costs as well, some of which are still being researched, but equating circumcision to capital punishment is asinine. There are no benefits to having one's head removed. When you have legitimate evidence from more than one source that is reliable…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:58 PM

While I agree that Men's Rights are important, I think you should use more compelling arguments than (medical) circumcision. There are legitimate benefits (not without risks of course) to circumcision and reasons for its medical practice, where issues like suicide rates, mandatory military selective service, and child custody battles are much more arguable regarding men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 08:20 AM
1

I would, but I've been banned for posting something similar. The mods there are pretty quick with the ban hammer, and short with the reasoning.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:52 AM
2

I think you are talking about a different type of fight. This is a man and woman in a heated argument, equivalent to a domestic dispute. Not some MMA ring or street fight. Be realistic with your expectations of situations.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:25 PM
2

You really don't get it. You don't understand that there are situations that happen every day where running/walking away is not an option. I work in an ER, part of my job is taking care of people, even criminals who completely disregard the health and safety of others. People have to be physically restrained on a very regular basis, because there are psychotics, drunks, and junkies out there who don't give a shit about you, the law or anything else. Go ahead and take your moral high road all you…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:39 PM
1

I generally am. Unless you are the type of person who just sexually assaults people. I'm not sure how your statement is relevant to the conversation?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:34 PM
1

Sexually assaults me or my friends/family. If some asshat guy or gal gets the notion to grab my junk, or my kids junk, or my wife at all, yes, I'm going to retaliate. Nothing you can argue is going to stop me from acting on impulse in that situation.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:00 PM
6

You assume quite a bit. The person who initiates the assault would be hard-pressed to sue, and if they did, they would have to face a counter-suit. And again, this is also also assuming police even show up before I punch him/her in the face and walk away.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:55 PM
12

violence is simply never the answer. Something of a naive point of view. If you can't even imagine a situation where getting physical is the only/best option, you have a very sheltered view on life. I suggest you spend some time on some overnight police ride-alongs, or sit in with security at Hospital ERs on the weekend nights. You will get to know your fellow human beings on a whole new level that you seem to not know exists, and will very likely change your answer.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:03 PM
14

If I or my wife/children have ALREADY been sexually assaulted, then violence has already occurred. I would be standing my ground/acting in defense at that point. I'm not actively going around, seeking out anybody that might need to get their ass kicked. But if someone attacks us, I will retaliate.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:17 AM
16

Yes, that can be how a fight starts. And if one does, I would completely comply with all police instructions willingly; as soon as they arrive. But until then, this person is going to regret attempting anything on me or mine.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:06 AM
31

I believe in true equality, which means that if someone comes to me and hits me in the balls, I'm going to punch them in the fucking face. I don't care if you are a man, woman, or otherwise, if you sexually assault me or those I care about, you are going to feel the repercussions, and deal with the consequences.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:56 AM
2

I'm sure with the throwaway account name "stonedgod420", everyone that reads this will take you very seriously and take to heart your message here. Nobody will think you are some loser weed-obsessed fuckwit who says things like "this is dope" about rap videos on the internet.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter