TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Edgarthefish Archive

View 0 posts and 189 comments by Edgarthefish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Consent and rough sex are not mutually exclusive.
/r/seduction24/07/19 03:53 AM
2

"Hey, there's a (cool activity/place) I know. You should come with me and check it out." Don't use the word date and avoid traditional "datey" things. Do that and there's no real pressure, no pressure but the pressure brought on by sexual tension.
/r/seduction29/03/18 05:37 AM
2

NLP has long been discredited. It has been chalked up to pseudoscience.
/r/seduction27/04/17 03:29 AM
1

I took the same course October of 2014 and I am going back again the end of July. The revelations it brought about at the time were incredible, but unfortunately they faded with my lack of practice. I was thinking about it before but pickup has evolved from being a set of techniques and practices to the redevelopment of masculinity in a post-feminist world. In a lot of ways men, and the masculine identity, have been lost with the upheaval of traditional gender roles brought about by feminism. Pi…
/r/seduction17/05/16 02:00 PM
2

I believe it's a characteristic called homophily.
/r/seduction12/01/16 10:08 PM
4

Of course her sexual needs matter. Try your best, do everything you can, be open and honest and communicate. But sometimes people don't cum for various reasons. I haven't cum during sex with my girlfriend while she has and vice versa. It happens. We aren't robots and some of us aren't designed to produce orgasms every time we have sex. The problem arises when she doesn't communicate well or know her body well enough to orgasm, or she has some mental hangups about her orgasms, and blames her part…
/r/seduction23/10/15 05:19 PM
0

You have to realize that you are not a robot and men sometimes can't get erections due to stress and many other things. You maybe really mentally aroused but your penis is not a machine and it sometimes will not work. Hell, I've been with my girlfriend a handful of times where I had an erection but I couldn't cum. It's been awhile since that happened but it does happen. My advice? Realize she can will be sexually satisfied whether she orgasms or not. She wants to be with you sexually so enjoy th…
/r/seduction23/10/15 03:55 PM
3

Well that's untrue. I date a girl who makes more than me. She's just egalitarian. No one really cares because the value I bring to the relationship is way more than just the money I make.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:36 PM
2

Broscience is a Youtube channel lampooning the gym culture a lot of guys buy into. It's actually really fuckin' funny.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:34 PM
3

Think of it like this, when you invest in yourself the return on your investment is partially gained through your interaction with others. When you invest in yourself you gain value, you can then use that value to empower and elevate others through a variety of means.
/r/seduction09/09/15 09:15 AM
9

The point is that you value yourself and give import to your own ideas and boundaries. And remember, the only way to be empathetic and to think of others and, even further, give to others is to, first, be a complete person.
/r/seduction09/09/15 09:13 AM
1

Well with HSV-2, there is something called viral shedding where the virus is reproducing but with almost no symptoms, sometimes none. HSV is transmitted by skin to skin contact and condoms don't necessarily cover all the areas where it can be transmitted. I don't recall whether HSV-1 goes through asymptomatic viral shedding as well. But if she has HSV-1 in her nether regions then the likelihood of transmission lowers.
/r/seduction27/05/15 07:44 PM
0

It's an opportunity to be vulnerable and can be the opening to starting a relationship with a serious emotional connection. If you don't, that's fine too.
/r/seduction06/05/15 11:02 AM
1

Sounds like your original goal isn't your current goal. We change and our desires change. What of it?
/r/seduction22/11/14 11:22 PM
4

The old saying goes, "Better to ask forgiveness than ask permission."
/r/seduction20/03/14 09:11 PM
0

I was referring to David's post not yours.
/r/seduction30/07/13 01:50 AM
10

Depends on the context of the exposure of said emotions and vulnerabilities. Don't lay it on thick, that's unnecessary and unattractive. But said in the right way and the right time it can enhance her view of your self-confidence. It proves to her that regardless of those things that affect you, you can admit them and be a better man for admitting it. TL;DR - No one's perfect and acting like it isn't doing you any favors.
/r/seduction29/07/13 07:52 PM
2

Your response kind of asks the question of men as to whether or not they can really be emotionally mature or puerile man-boys with dick needs.
/r/seduction09/01/13 09:09 PM
3

I think pickup is just beginning to realize it isn't really pickup anymore but male self-improvement. There's lots of whys and wherefores, debate, angst, and growing pains about the whole thing but that is basically it.
/r/seduction09/01/13 08:52 PM
2

The odd thing about it is I imagine some feminists would use the argument that only men are the most qualified individuals because we are the ones with all the privilege.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:35 AM
-1

Wut?
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:24 AM
0

Doing the same thing on my FB.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:55 AM
-1

Thank you. I'm just glad someone else gets this. His actions were completely and utterly retaliatory and not in self-defense. I've repeated this over and over again but for some reason people want to defend an indefensible man, most likely just because he's a man.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:09 AM
-7

I'm attempting to discuss the probabilities of certain actions taking place. Let me ask you this, do you think she would have spit on him and slapped him had he not insulted her or threatened to have his granddaughter beat her up? Watch the video again. Before she strikes him the bus door opens and the lights come on. The bus was no in motion therefore there was never any danger of him running people over or suddenly losing control. Third the use of force continuum is used in addition to standar…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:35 PM
-3

His immediate reaction should have been to de-escalate the situation. Did he do that? No. Could he have not threatened to have his granddaughter beat her up? Yes Could he have not insulted her in front of a bus full of people? Yes Do you think she would have struck and spit on him had he not caused an entire bus full of people to laugh at her? This man is indefensible. They are both wrong. They both escalated the situation. Don't justify his actions.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:23 PM
-9

No he really doesn't have a right to do that. If he hadn't verbally assaulted her as well then it probably wouldn't have escalated. Did anyone else hear him make a remark about her face looking all sliced up? Did you hear everyone on the bus laugh at her? Shit's gotta hurt. By no means does that justify her actions but it does not look good on him either. He could've put a stop to it yet every time he escalated. We are defending someone who could at multiple points ended the conflict. They both …
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:20 PM
-8

She probably wouldn't have come back at him had he not uppercut her and tried to physically throw her off the bus. Physically removing passengers from the bus is probably not in his job description. Not to mention everyone's plea of self-defense is, in my opinion, based in irrationality.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:14 PM
-5

I sincerely disagree with you. I don't see how anyone could define his actions as self-defense. He took his time getting up and squaring up to strike her.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:13 PM
-14

So the question you have to ask yourself is who escalates the violence or backs away. It's not like he couldn't get off the bus. He clearly escalated the situation by, let me repeat, uppercutting her and choking her. Do you think it would have been nearly as bad a confrontation had he not done those things? Do you think his response was appropriate or proportional?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:11 PM
-2

The bus wasn't moving when he was hit. The door to the bus is clearly open.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:08 PM
-10

First of all someone may not escalate to a gun or knife without being more considerably provoked. Perhaps by being uppercut or choked and physically thrown off a bus. The same goes for a boyfriend. Second of all the bus was stopped when she hit him so everyone else fails at hypotheticals also. Third, the right to self-defense in Ohio, where this takes place, is reasonable only if the defensive measure is proportionate to the force used or the threat of force. Does this seem like a proportionate …
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:07 PM
-21

She wouldn't still be attacking him had he not uppercut her and choked her. A bit of a chicken and an egg argument.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:02 PM
-11

A potential threat that he should not have dealt with in that manner. Just because someone isn't slapping you doesn't give you the right to upper cut them and throw them out of a bus.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:02 PM
-6

An immediate response wouldn't have been given him time to say, "You're going to jail now. You're going to jail now."
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:00 PM
-11

Oh, so that continuum is why police get to brutalize citizens? Awesome. Unfortunately, he's not a peace officer. He's the driver of a bus with passengers. Should he not take into account the welfare of his other passengers in the course of the conflict and maybe get off the bus and call real police officers?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:59 PM
-6

I'm not going to deny this would be a fucked up if not humorous display for most people if both people were men. It does not mean I would be any less sad about it. I know there are horrible double standards men have to put up with but this situation is not an example of one. I will say the media's response to it has been rather egregious.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:53 PM
-18

What? Yes, because that makes sense. If I'm the driver of a bus on duty my response to that is not uppercutting someone and choking them out. If I was drunk and at a bar that might be my response. Maybe. What kind of fucking world do you people live in that you would advocate violence like this on the slimmest of margins that it maybe self-defense. Have you seen the video? Are you really justifying uppercutting someone, throwing a stunned human being from a bus then choking them?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:46 PM
-16

If a woman behaved the same way this man did I would be saying the same thing. The reaction was no in proportion or appropriate to the response in any way shape or form. And in fact, if you watch the video, when she slapped him the door to the bus was open.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:41 PM
-15

Also why does no one notice or care that while she may have endangered a bus full of people that his reaction to her attack might've put the other people on the bus in harm's way? Since we are using hypotheticals in this thread as justification lets discuss the situation in which she had a gun or a knife, or her boyfriend was on the bus with a gun or a knife. His reaction to the situation was not appropriate. If you are the bus driver your responsibility is to the passengers on the bus and prote…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:35 PM
-6

Maybe excessive force in removing her from the bus but uppercutting her doesn't really help you along in getting someone off the bus.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:31 PM
0

The amount of hypotheticals used to justify his actions in the thread is overwhelming. You can't use what-if's as reasons.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:29 PM
-9

Actually in Ohio the definition of self-defense is having a reaction that is proportionate to the threat of force or the force used in the initial attack. The response is clearly not proportionate.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:26 PM
-26

When he hit her the bus was stopped. Self-defense is reactionary not retaliatory. His actions were quite convincingly retaliatory. The principle of self-defense is defending one's self against harm. The occasion had passed for him to defend himself against her assault. His decision to stop the bus, confront her, then uppercut her without immediate provocation was quite clearly retaliatory. There is 0 question about that. Notwithstanding his throwing her bodily off the bus then choking her. Unfor…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:03 PM
-28

So uppercutting someone and choking them is self-defense? Brilliant logic. Make no mistake, I'm not defending her or her actions but trying to define what he did as self-defense is just an outright falsehood. Don't defend him because of his gender.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:25 PM
2

You seem to have this reddit confused with /r/egalitarian. It is not. This is /r/MensRights. The two are not the same Egalitarianism and MensRights are not mutually exclusive. But they do! That's what "equality" has created" No they don't. The government is run by, wait for it, mostly men. They subscribe to some feminist ideology but then again, there are a lot of Republicans who think crazy, strange fucked up things about womens reproductive systems. Don't be a fucking conspiracy theorist. The …
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:57 AM
2

Nothing is ruined. It's not as if these events have been outlawed on a grand scale. It is not the only sane choice. The sane choice is letting people do as they choose to do outside a public institution It is not sane to encourage a state sponsored event that is gender discriminatory. Again, nothing has been lost. I wonder why you want to defend this so much? This community can have a father-daughter dance any day. Mothers and sons can organize their own baseball games. Why is it so vital that i…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 02:58 AM
3

What about the detriment it caused those daughters without fathers? What about their exclusion? What about sons without mothers and their exclusion? Doing things for the benefit of the majority is a slippery slope. The value is not lost either. It is just that public advocation of these exclusionary events isn't lawful nor is it morally fair. Fathers and daughters can dance whenever and where ever they like. Mothers and sons can organize baseball games on their own. Mothers and daughters can org…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:29 PM
3

Working for the majority is not equality. Explain how this is working like shit anyway? Posting provocative statements really doesn't add anything to the discussion. It just adds emotional content the hivemind can upvote.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:58 PM
6

I'm wondering if anyone gets this at all. The school said, "Oh, Rhode Island law says we can't have gender discriminatory events? That's fine, we won't. But you guys can have private events of this sort all on your own. We probably shouldn't be engaging in gender stereotyping anyway. Thanks and have a nice day." Now everyone else is like, "OMG tradition! Wtf! Bring it bacK! We want our little girls to ONLY have school sanctioned dance events with their fathers!" Does anyone not see this is a goo…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:26 PM
3

In short, he got over AA by being outcome independent.
/r/seduction08/09/12 08:28 AM
7

That's the right attitude!
/r/seduction02/09/12 07:30 AM
2

I think it might be because the thought of rejecting someone is something far too many empathize with and giving it voice and clarity, even if polite and above board, makes it more real for them, and more scary.
/r/seduction02/09/12 07:26 AM
5

This is a semantic argument that holds little relevance to the problem at hand. We know what the word means. Its use has a deeper meaning. We hear the word objectify and bear negative feelings. Attempting to dispel its connotation is a much harder task than addressing the problem of being objectified.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:59 AM
2

You are missing the very real distinction between connotative meaning, which is the meaning we understand as being culturally relevant and how we frame the underlying meaning of the word in it's most common usage. You are looking at the word from it's denotative meaning. A meaning that is derived solely from its dictionary definition. While this is an important definition to use it can be confusing when used correctly in a sentence but lacking the correct context it's connotative or culturally r…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:55 AM
3

Would you be any less kind or patient? Any less angry or hostile? If these differences were accepted as anything else then we would be no different. The problem arises when we begin to classify and differentiate. You could be man or woman and still be shy and quiet or loud and boisterous.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:50 PM
38

In a strict definition ripped from the dictionary yes they are abnormal. But humans don't speak in strict terms like that. We have shades of meaning and connotation that we all observe without a second thought. It would be wiser to call them different just as you and I are different they are different. We are all different in unique ways. Even better would be to not differentiate at all but just refer to them as people. Unfortunately there is a natural human tendency to classify that is only ove…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 05:42 AM
8

Yeah there are facts which are 99% indisputable. Like the capital of Wisconsin or the number of ventricles in an average humans heart. Anything that is attempted to be defined beyond that which lies in the material real is highly subject to bias, misinformation, or inconclusive evidence as to its veracity.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:08 AM
3

Yeah the commenters completely destroy the reasoning in the article.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:59 AM
15

I feel like you're kind of the like the Marcus Aurelius of moderators. The quintessential philosopher-mod.
/r/seduction13/05/12 05:06 PM
4

Because it encourages the woman to intentionally deceive. This implies there is previous trust in a relationship. Are you saying in a trusting relationship that men should always doubt there partners? A man's only recourse for preventing pregnancy in a woman is a condom, or vasectomy. Vasectomys are surgical procedures that some doctors won't perform on men too early in life because of complications and permanent sterilization. Even then successful vasectomy reversals last only so long and there…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:37 AM
7

But there is objectively more need for mens homeless shelters due to the fact that the majority of the homeless are men.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:19 PM
2

Theres another assumption that some boys need masculine traits encouraged, which is wrong. Letting a child express themselves is fine. Most children grow out of it. A minority of them don't and that is fine. They are allowed to blur the lines of gender identity. And what the fuck does David Reimer have to do with this? His penis was destroyed by circumcision and doctors made a horrendous decision to sexually reassign him. That is in NO way allowing a child to pursue their own gender identity. Th…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 03:54 AM
2

boys wearing dresses is a trait of gender identity not sex. sex organs do not determine gender. you also assume every male identifies with masculine gender traits which is not the case by any means.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:34 PM
3

its funny you say gender is not a construct but say a little boy in a dress is confused. if its not a construct and fluid then theres nothing confusing about it. its simply expression. the boy may grow out of it he may not. the child needs to make those decisions about who they are. you make it sound as if a child has no intuition as to who they may be and what is right or wrong for their developing identity. that its simply society or the parents fault for their behavior. i find it silly you th…
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:15 AM
6

You assume there is a gender agenda on the part of the parents. You also assume that child is built to be simply male or female when in reality there is a spectrum of gender identities. There are boys who realize at a very young age that they are different from other boys they know. Likewise for girls. Telling those sorts of children that they have a problem because they identify more with a feminine or female gender role is pushing a gender agenda on them. More so than parents who let the child…
/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:27 AM
9

How does allowing a child the exploration of their gender identity amount to abuse? Would you rather we mold children into easily identifiable gender roles? Force them into a binary gender cast?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 04:48 AM
0

Of course. If he says no but she replicates essentially the same behavior as the man in the hypothetical. There are other circumstances in which a woman could rape a man. But I don't make exceptions for one over the other. The actions speak for themselves. Every situation is unique and some are far more subtle and layered than others. Obviously this makes the emphasis on finding out what happened very important. Typically though I would assume that two parties that woke up drunk together would b…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:35 AM
-10

Even pick up artists know that you push until she stops you. Of course there are more complicated issues at play but there are also lots of ways of saying no. More to the point the no in the hypothetical is exactly that, no in numerous ways.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 03:45 PM
62

If she's drunk, passing out, and repeatedly saying, "No." It's rape. I don't get how you can assume that you are somehow personally detached from the meaning of rape when the meaning of rape EXCLUSIVELY involves two parties. The assumption of detachment in the process of that hypothetical situation leads to... wait for it.... the ACT of rape. Plain and fucking simple. No always fucking means no. The fact you opened a discussion about rape in that manner is the reason everyone is jumping down you…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 04:06 AM
2

Perhaps for the first month, but slowly he'd learn. He'd learn to acclimate to talking to girl. He'd become more comfortable. He'd learn about the social interactions that are unique to chatting up a girl at the bus stop or at the grocery store, even more so if he's at a bar or club. Though I doubt a nerd would be caught at bar or club. In a deeper sense it is the fact that if he is truly hopeful about getting a girlfriend then he'd realize that there are just as many women in this world as men …
/r/MensRights18/09/11 06:44 AM
9

I can't even bring myself to read the article you are responding too. I keep attempting to read it, pick up where I left off, and it just gets drowned out into a length of plodding and uninteresting. His letter, while attempting to be inspiring and, perhaps egalitarian does nothing to alleviate the mind of the backlash that she deserved. She WAS shallow and condescending. She regrets it most fiercely I imagine. If she doesn't then her life and the lives of all those who responded to her so vocif…
/r/MensRights17/09/11 03:50 AM
7

I wouldn't define the SCUM Manifesto (if that is what you are referring to) as a scholarly work. I was thinking more along the lines of the work of Koss, Gidycz, and Wisniewski. That sort of scholarly work.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 07:18 AM
19

Play fair with the ones who will though. As has been pointed out to me here, Feminists =/= women, and Woman =/= feminists.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 07:01 AM
8

Then you haven't been looking, or are lying. I think she meant, possibly, explicitly misandrist. Any scholarly work that is explicitly misandrist would most likely be laughed off by main-stream academia or relegated to the corners of extremism. Though, I imagine a lot of study has been influenced by misandrist/institutionalized feminist ideologues. Also a lot of gender study can, and is, construed as implying misandrist concepts.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 07:00 AM
1

You think that doesn't happen here in the US? Douchebag bros trying to pick fights for no reason? The thing is guys like that don't pick fights for noble reasons. They pick fights for egotistical reasons. Reasons that serve only them or to rectify some slight against their person. Not to mention, as I said, the guy is a bouncer, he's primed for an aggressive mindset. He doesn't pick a fight with a guy. He lightly shoves him away and takes her off.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 08:20 AM
-2

It's because no one is asking her permission to drive. She acts of her own volition and it is only AFTER she makes the choice to drive drunk that she is held responsible for any consequences. If someone asked her, "Can we drive?" and she's drunk, the other party would be held responsible for driving with her, if, in some fantastic world, 2 people could drive the same car. That doesn't happen in ours. Now intercourse requires 2 people. If he asks her, "Can we have sex?" and she says yes, he will …
/r/MensRights12/08/11 08:15 AM
3

I completely agree. I think the law underscores the notion that she is not within her capabilities to reason that she is too drunk to drive. I believe people are confused about my use of within her reasoning. If she's not within her reasoning then she's unable to make decisions. Should she choose to make them then, in these cases, A. She goes to jail for drunk driving B. A man goes to jail. Position A, I'm fine with. She shouldn't drive. Someone should have stopped her or she should have had the…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:20 AM
-2

She's not. I never said she was within her reasoning to drive. She's not within her reasoning to do much of anything if she's drunk enough. Least of all get in a 1 1/2 ton steel contraption capable of inhuman speeds. That's certainly no disconnect. Also, if you are that intoxicated there is no belief in your inability to consent. You are UNABLE to consent. If you are that drunk contracts are voided and plans get canceled. There's a reason I went on about levels of intoxication. You are certainly…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:10 AM
0

Well, first off, he wasn't even raped. He was found was an older woman in his bed who was attempting to remove his clothes. Second, I'm unsure of NZ law but, and I'm assuming here, that charges would either be automatically brought against her or the parents would have that discretion, if the guy was a minor. Maybe he didn't feel sexually assaulted. Maybe he could give two fucks less. My statement was more in regard to how she got in there in the first place. If she was found by the mother, HOW …
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:58 AM
1

Actually thats not even close to what this video portrays. No one is getting beaten up, no one is anymore violent than a light shove. Most of the people involved do more, or less, what they should. Get informed. Ask for her friends. Have her her friends intervene. She's obviously trashed. This whole, "OMG! Guys are going to start beating up doods left and right!" attitude is not even close to what would happen.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:49 AM
-4

It's called informed consent. If she was drunk and drove she is putting people in danger and herself. If she's drunk and decides to sleep with someone she may not be entirely within her reasoning to sleep with anything. I think it entirely depends on her state of inebriation. Legal intoxication limits are INCREDIBLY low. I'm unaware of how intoxication is proven in court other than by her word or by eyewitness testimony. Though if she's drunk enough to not remember or become unconscious then yes…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:59 AM
2

That was in quite poor taste sir.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:48 AM
2

W T F. How old was this guy? His MOTHER found the woman undressing him? WHY WAS SHE NOT CHARGED?!?! WTF IS THIS SHIT?!?!?!
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:47 AM
1

Moral responsibility with perhaps legal consequences for both.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:45 AM
4

YES! Personal responsibility. If you want to get that drunk, tell your friends, "Hey guys! I'm getting abso-fucking-lutely obliterated tonight. Don't let me go home with weirdos and watch my back please!" It's really that simple. Informed planning does wonders.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:40 AM
5

TBF, in the video she isn't really doing what she wants. She's drunk enough to submit to his advances. There is no real advance on her part at all. It goes back to what was mentioned above about how this woman is simply an object with no agency. In addition, the guy interfering is a bouncer so you have to understand his point of view and state of mind at this point. He's primed for violence.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:38 AM
2

If you are so severely drunk that you black out then you shouldn't be held accountable for your actions but neither should anyone acting upon you while you ARE that drunk. The reason being is that YOU got yourself that drunk.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:33 AM
2

Then don't change the dynamic. Do what you do best but don't start second guessing the future when it hasn't even happened yet. The consequences are something you both deal with. Talk them out rationally if she brings it up afterwards. Talk about it beforehand. Don't change your behavior based on your perception of the relationship already established. It will only complicate things if you act strange. And, MOST IMPORTANTLY, don't stick your dick in crazy. Screening a target comes with selection…
/r/seduction02/08/11 02:04 AM
1

I'm not sure if this meant to be blatantly obvious, sarcastic, or something else entirely.
/r/seduction29/07/11 07:30 AM
2

You have more issues than can be noted in a reply to your comment. I wonder if there's hope in that hateful heart of yours.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:27 PM
2

This type of vitriol does not belong here. There are women who are on our side and there are women who have found the tone of the remarks on The Talk abhorrent. Your attitude reflects a deeper malcontent that is not approximated by MRA's. We don't believe all women are man hating bitches. Is your mother one? Your sister, if you have one? What about your grandmother? Your generalizations about women are just the sort of talk that also detracts from the credibility of this movement. It does no one…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 08:00 AM
2

It shall be incorporated sir!!
/r/seduction08/07/11 02:08 AM
2

Yes. I was diagnosed with Bi-polar Disorder type II when I was 22. I took pills for a little while that definitely helped me. I've developed coping mechanisms also. Noticing when I'm getting down by consciously redirecting my thoughts. Calming myself down when I have manic episodes. I am depressed. I know that. But pills aren't going to make me want to do anything. The issues I have aren't going to improve or disappear because of a pill. I'm a big advocate of cognitive therapy. Talk therapy more…
/r/seduction08/07/11 12:47 AM
2

My past haunts me though. I need to lay to rest all the cognitive dissonances and distortions I've carried with me. Expose the apathy for my own person I've lived with for so long. Really it is apathy that is, in my opinion, the worst sin. I do nothing. I am motivated for nothing intrinsic to my person. I do nothing for myself. I grew up taking the path of least resistance. Moved only by the wants and needs of others, taking responsibility for others feelings. I feel no motivation other than tha…
/r/seduction08/07/11 12:13 AM
2

One the flip side of that is I never remembered him saying I love you, I'm proud of you, You did well and I never got to experience that. As much as I do take solace in that perfect miniature relationship. It's aftereffects were extremely important to the life I led afterwards. Those formal years of identification and development that a young person normally takes were glossed over. I feel like I became nothing. I warmed to nothing. I didn't have many interests and any interests I had were burde…
/r/seduction07/07/11 11:48 PM
2

Well it seems things have worked out in your favor. I can only hope as much for myself. I've been carrying around a lot of baggage for a very long time and I'm just now finally going to talk to someone about it. It's funny. May, Friday the 13th was the exact same day my father had died in that car crash 17 years earlier. I finally decided to go visit his memorial after probably 6-7 years and let loose many old emotions and things I never got the chance to say. I think in some ways it helped me s…
/r/seduction07/07/11 11:27 PM
2

It is framed as developing a social skill. Some of us missed on developing socially as adolescents and children. I certainly did. My parents divorced when I was 8. We moved. My dad died in a car crash that almost took my brother. An accident in which I was also involved. We moved again. Then my mom decides to skip me a grade from elementary school to middle school. I lose all my friends and lose my support system I had in elementary school. New people, new school, new teachers and it all was a l…
/r/seduction07/07/11 11:10 PM
2

Glad you could make it!
/r/seduction07/07/11 10:39 PM
3

You are a cancer on this subreddit. These sorts of comments do nothing for the advocacy of mens rights. Rather they provide arguments for the demonization of the movement as a whole as it tends to be that people will variously point out the bad in a wealth of good. As the old adage goes, "One bad apple ruins the bunch."
/r/MensRights04/07/11 05:22 AM
4

I don't think your role reversal is holding up. The real reversal would be a woman in power who has appeared to rape a man who was of a lower class and he accused her of rape. The funny thing is you probably wouldn't hear 90% of what is being thrown around let alone your simple story within the context of the article. Plus her article doesn't come off as entitled feminist bitchiness. She's saying be careful who you fuck and don't stick your dick in crazy. The flip side of that is women who let m…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 05:15 AM
6

That is a great site. No mention of mutilation. No derisive speech about circumcised men. Only sympathy, education and compassion. A wonderful way to communicate to men about circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 05:51 AM
3

Because Congress could give too fucks less about it. The AMA is populated with cut men who retroactively justify their own decisions based on the continuation of suffering they themselves felt. Same with the BMA and AAP.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 07:25 PM
-1

But it's NOT missing functionality. You are missing about as much functionality as if you had your tonsils removed or an appendix, especially considering you had it done at birth and CAN'T know the difference. Sexual sensitivity is another area of discussion entirely.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 07:04 PM
0

No I am not kidding you. You're donating proclivities have no bearing on this what so ever. Also, good luck trying to get me or other men who are perfectly happy with there cut cocks to look at it that way. In other words you decree circumcision mutilation, then attempt to recruit those who you have deemed imperfect to your cause. The problem is multitudes of men don't have the same view of a cut cock as you do and telling them they are mutilated when it flies in the face of their self-image isn…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 06:52 PM
-2

That is not mutilation. You are simply rationalizing your definition for the sake of your own argument. I am not deformed, I am not imperfect, I am not in any way, shape, or form mutilated. I did not consent to circumcision, yet I also did not consent to being born to the parents I had, or the world I was born into. To tell other men that circumcision is mutilation is simply and quite effectively polarizing the issue to an unwelcome degree. When you define circumcision like that you are simply e…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 06:26 PM
0

So you are saying my penis is imperfect in some way? Does it not work as intended? My penis ejaculates, it pees when I need it too, it functions just as any other cut or un-cut cock would work. It's function is perfect and to say that my penis is imperfect is a subjective judgment. It has no grounds in objectivity.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 06:10 PM
3

By definition he was NOT mutilated. Calling circumcision mutilation is scare tactics. There are far better avenues of refutation for circumcision that calling it mutilation, which it is not.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 06:06 PM
1

What? Sense. This makes none.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 05:00 PM
-2

The funny thing is I never said I was for or against circumcision. I don't need convincing. The option is open to the parents. Most medical associations believe it is up to the parent but don't condone routine circumcision. I myself am unsure if I would or not at this point. Plainly considering having children at all at this point in my life is beyond my scope of reasoning. Regardless of my being pro or anti-circumcision I just want to clarify that circumcision IS NOT MUTILATION and that circumc…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:16 PM
0

Look up the many various definitions of mutilation. There application is wholly unconnected to circumcision or based purely in subjective terms. And as to your comment about it being true. It is. There is nothing wrong with it. It functions just as I had always hoped. Spitting at me in the height of ecstasy and allowing me to pee in the vertical. Don't make it out to be that I am somehow trying to convince myself. There has never been a shadow of a doubt that my penis works perfectly fine. Ask t…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:14 PM
-5

And there's little negative to having it removed either. My dick works FINE! I can pee and orgasm and fuck and masturbate and twirl it around like a fucking rope if I fucking feel like it. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH MY PENIS. Every time I read a thread like this I get the feeling there is an undercurrent of anger towards men who are circumcised or pity. That there is something wrong with me. There's not. I'm perfectly fucking fine. Another thing is that circumcision IS NOT MUTILATION! Look up t…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:36 PM
8

TBF. She isn't outraged that women alone are facing lowered LE's. She's angry everyone is. She's lensing the issue within feminism to raise awareness about the unhealthy lifestyles and lack of adequate medical. The only connection I see this article having to the title of this post is the fact it's from feministing.com.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:02 AM
5

Isn't it more reasonable to involve all the students and tell them that a message of respect and nonviolence among all your peers, and not just girls/women, is a universal ideal we should all strive towards? Do men not disrespect one another? Do women not disrespect men? Do women not disrespect other women?
/r/MensRights19/06/11 01:51 AM
2

The only thing that will solve this is male contraception. Nothing else could.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 04:22 AM
3

The problem is that we as humans aren't wired for objective hard-line gender equality. We aren't built for that. Our brains aren't designed for that and a few thousand years of culture aren't going to change how the circuitry in our brains work. Feminists need to understand that and so do MRA's. What we need to do is understand and appreciate the differences we do have and accept them for what they are rather than fit square pegs in round holes.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 04:06 PM
-1

No, it's dead because many women regard chivalry as a sign of weakness in men in the western world, and they don't respect that. FTFY
/r/MensRights15/06/11 03:51 PM
-2

These are long leaps of reasoning I must say. The only real argument that can be formed against circumcision is that a child has no say in the matter. That is the only premise to the argument that holds any water for me. I'm cut. I don't fear doctors. I, for awhile at least, had issues concerning the size of my cock but that may ahve had something to do with watching porn and wondering how I measured up to unrealistic expectations of what was required of me. That explanation has a more plausible…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:16 AM
4

Really you've already done the right thing. You made multiple attempts to apologize. Dependent on how much energy you expend to really make her understand is really up to you. You could take it further than a few phone calls. You could actively seek her out and lay it all out. Tell her what was going on in your head and make it distinctly clear that you behaved extremely poorly, that person that night wasn't consistent with who you are and how you think of yourself, then ask her for forgiveness …
/r/seduction16/05/11 08:19 PM
2

You said IMing? Are you talking cell txt messages or something like AIM? If it's AIM, it may be different. That sort of interaction takes on a whole new role when it's instantaneous like that. If it's cell txt's, drop it, txt's are, as people have noted, logistic. Don't let her message break your frame. Keep being you and behaving as you have and when she brings it up again, talk about it. Don't talk about it because she wants to. She enjoys what you are doing so don't change that and don't conc…
/r/seduction04/05/11 12:56 AM
1

Upvoted for thinking like me.
/r/seduction27/04/11 09:26 PM
2

I'm not sure if that post you linked is a troll or not... If it's not I'm flabbergasted by the authors cognitive dissonance.
/r/seduction25/04/11 04:55 AM
0

There is little to no guarantee that a privatized company would do any better providing protection. In fact, in light of the information we have about a lot of companies it would end up being more corrupt and tyrannized than a public institution. The whole notion of anarcho-capitalism is just insane in the first place. All it does is provide a near perfect system to discriminate based on socio-economic status. What a wonderful world. Regardless this video is gross.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 04:50 PM
2

I, for one, will say thanks.
/r/seduction15/04/11 02:29 AM
4

I would disagree. I think women appreciate certain aspects of a morally and ethically void man, they do not appreciate his lack of ethics or morals. If this woman did, she wouldn't be beating herself up so bad. She'd be like, "Fuck 'Em! I'll find me a nice ripe young boytoy and mess with his head."
/r/seduction14/04/11 11:18 PM
1

In a gesture of good faith I think perhaps some of the Sedditors should extend a hand to Forever Alone and point them to things and places that will allow them to express themselves outside of the frame of, "Intellectual and caring introverts" that they seem to cling to.
/r/seduction14/04/11 07:40 PM
1

Really isn't that what half of PUA is about, being attactive? I mean fuck.. if you can't be attractive how are you supposed to build attraction?
/r/seduction14/04/11 07:23 PM
14

But it's not ok to be an alcoholic who ignores and cheats on his wife. It's great you want to be alpha as fuck but don't be morally and ethically void.
/r/seduction14/04/11 06:56 PM
0

Clearly my statement has drawn some serious misinterpretation. He's used previous groundwork laid down by scientific research to define certain behaviors we have. That intersects with feminism and it's effect on social equality. The conflict and interest is raised by trying to understand the boundaries of the two and when and where men and women can separate the two in a healthy manner.
/r/seduction11/04/11 07:33 PM
-1

I never conflated the two. I meant science had a hand in how he was interpreting and speculating on what was going on. Not to mention the most relevant aspects of science in the article were the one's concerning the neural circuitry governing arousal. fMRI has brought us along way. The amount of research and study conducted utilizing fMRI as a window into how our minds function is astounding. Plus I never said science was happening in the article. He used some scientific background and theory to…
/r/seduction11/04/11 07:30 PM
-4

You are blowing things a a bit out of the water. He's not using the EroRom author as an authority but a perspective on the effect feminism has had on erotic literature. That statement is meant as a contrast to the fact that our brains are wired for sexual submission/dominance. And the indications you speak of do rightly point to seduction theory. It's not been empirically proven beyond doubt, but then again we are consistently proving previous scientific knowledge wrong with new techniques and r…
/r/seduction11/04/11 07:05 PM
0

The article is based on legitimate scientific study. The end of the article dovetails into a bit of editorialisation. Overall I think the questions it raises are more important than the research covered.
/r/seduction11/04/11 05:35 PM
1

I agree with that but on the whole most guys don't know have the body language down so well to get away with it. Disqualification is the simplest answer. Evolutionary psychology taught us that chicks see every male as a potential suitor or mate. When you disarm that mechanism it, first, breaks her frame, and second, it removes you from the potential unconscious suitor list making it easier to insinuate yourself.
/r/seduction11/04/11 05:09 PM
26

I'm posting this to 2X. Anyone want some popcorn?
/r/seduction11/04/11 04:46 PM
13

You, sir, are awesome. Never stop this. I upvote this everytime!
/r/seduction10/04/11 03:22 AM
6

This idea that all strippers are horrible, slutty, crazy bitches is really off the mark. It seems like alot of people reduce strippers to their profession and extrapolate history based off that also. I've met ALOT of strippers and they aren't all crazy or slutty or horrible. Some have been genuine girls trying to get by because of kids, school, or circumstance. Some are, some aren't. It's just another holdover stereotype from the 80's-90's.
/r/seduction08/04/11 04:58 PM
14

Do NOT tell her you used her as a pick-up test dummy. That would destroy her in ways you would find hard to imagine. Tell her,"Things aren't quite as I once thought they were. The more I'm with you the more I realize that I'm not into this. I don't think we should see eachother anymore." I would make her feel as comfortable as possible before saying anything.
/r/seduction08/04/11 04:42 PM
0

LMAO! Absolutely freakin' awesome.
/r/seduction08/04/11 02:01 AM
3

Maybe if he was interested in her. She wants what she can't have. Here's what we learned from this FR. Kino escalation and just doing it. She shivered and he didn't even ask to do it. He just did it. This is the girl that gets everything and can't figure out why she's not getting him. Thus she wants him, simply, and most likely, because she can't have him. In other words, he's making himself scarce. For a chick like this it would seem scarcity is one of the more potent weapons to get her attract…
/r/seduction04/04/11 10:16 PM
1

I'll totally agree with you on that. It seems like that question is an indirect LMR attempt. The thing is, you're both there partially undressed, and she's probably wet and you most likely made her that way. Re-direct the conversation toward the now. Squeeze her hands when you tell her what reggieband said. Give her a serious look. Wait for her to melt a little inside then move back in for the kill.
/r/seduction04/04/11 10:03 PM
1

This is what we both want now, obviously. Worrying about it now won't help me, or you. Let's have this, this moment, this night and I'll tell you we can talk about it all day tomorrow, alright? That's what I'd say.
/r/seduction04/04/11 10:00 PM
3

Finish the article. She's been barking up his tree all day and he hasn't even been throwing nuts at her from the top of his tree of awesome.
/r/seduction04/04/11 09:54 PM
2

I'm intrigued myself. I have noticed the same problem. My problem I've noticed is I suffer from situational confidence. The job I have requires me to interact with people constantly. I'm always witty and charming and, fuck-it-all, I've had girls give me numbers after just a few minutes. I'm boss at my job. I can get anyone to smile, tease anyone, touch anyone and it's awesome. I'm the pinnacle of social interaction at work. But it's only at work. I'm assuming a role at work and have 0.01% outcom…
/r/seduction03/04/11 06:57 AM
0

Heh, well I don't think it's really healthy to focus on such minute details, but I will tell you since it's fresh in my mind. Gentle touching on side and back on the way in the bar, arm around back in booth, hand on thigh, hand on knee under skirt, hand in skirt, honeypot. :) FTFY
/r/seduction03/04/11 06:47 AM
1

http://femaletalk.com/news/mens-rights-movement Yes. Read that. Please.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 01:39 AM
6

? Me? But you don't know anything about me and I've never used it as a dirty word or ascribed myself to any notion that feminism is a dirty word. My mother raised me by herself. My parents divorced when I was 8 and then my father died instantly in a horrific car accident that almost took my brother, killed 2 other people and that I was also involved in. She went back to school quite soon after the accident and raised me and my brother, on her own. She graduated Cum Laude from Otterbein College w…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:44 PM
3

Does foaming-at-the-mouth mean anything to you? I can only imagine that is what you must be doing as you type these posts. My 59 year old mother won't even refer to herself as a feminist anymore because of the belligerent hateful rhetoric feminists like yourself foment.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:46 PM
1

Any progress made from the advice in that thread? I read most of it.
/r/seduction31/03/11 06:07 AM
4

By treating her right I mean keeping her interested in him, keeping her attracted to him. Some girls will end up with guys who cant keep up. They'll end up staying in a relationship just because it's there.
/r/seduction24/03/11 07:39 AM
0

There's lots of things that happen that aren't so bad, so they aren't that important and alot of those same things we could stop but don't, because they aren't a big deal. People are allowed to make choices. Parents make choices for their children. The thing is if you stop letting people make that choice, what other choices that 'aren't big deals, easily fixed with no reprecussion' are we going to legislate against? What about those who are performing circumcision for religious reasons? There wa…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:22 AM
1

From what you've said, in a manner befitting a discussion (something I wasn't doing myself initially, for which I apologize), it seems you would leave the choice open to the parents as to do it or not. I would not regard my statement about gender issues as being less important that others trollish or quaint. It's my opinion. There are issues I would rather take up the cause for other than Men's Rights. I'm not saying the issue isn't important but, in my personal view, they are less valuable than…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:03 AM
8

Well done man.
/r/seduction24/03/11 12:40 AM
10

I have reservations about the fact that she might do this to him. He can't know, and as has been stated here before, abudance mentality, no outcome dependence and you only live once. He told her to break up with her boyfriend. I'm assuming it won't go further till then. Another point is that if her boyfriend was treating her right in the first place she wouldn't be shaken by his advances. Then again who knows? She just might be an attention whore.
/r/seduction24/03/11 12:39 AM
1

Well. It's not really mutilation. Look up the definitions, or several if you will, and apply those to what's going on. Mutilation does not apply.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:46 PM
-1

That's a bit of a solipsist point of view. I wouldn't go take my thought that far. There is a balance between realizing what is and is not important in the state of events in which we are present. As the saying goes, we are making mountains out of molehills.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 06:35 PM
-1

Me getting punched in the face isn't a big deal. The circumstances under which I was punched in the face might cause me, personally, to make it a big deal for myself and the puncher but otherwise in the grand scheme of things its a completely negligible occurence.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:41 AM
-1

As Carl Sagan once expounded, "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence." I can't say that it may not have altered some minor differences in the lives of some boys but the correlative nature of studies done does not prove that circumcision irrevocably alters the development of male children. The same applies to opponents of the procedure also. Regardless of the abject horror some of you experienced watching this, the only argument you can formulate against this practice is one born…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:58 AM
-1

You should probably be more worried about the HUNDREDS OF FUCKING THOUSANDS OF BOYS who are dying every year around the globe. Are you as bent out of shape about that? Letting those children die is unnecessary and preventable. You are raising hell over a study someone already pointed to as dubious and measures just a very small minority of the deaths inflicted upon boys due to other circumstances within humanity's control. Get with it man, it's not the end of the world. Boys aren't some dying br…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:50 AM
-3

FGM is usually not usually conducted anywhere CLOSE to birth. It's rarely done with anesthetic. It utterly and completely removes a girl's ability to achieve sexual satisfaction. There is a small minority of women who choose to wear corsets. Castrati, well, little I know about that but there isn't much of a precedent for it anymore if I haven't heard about it. Footbinding has fallen away considerably in modern times. The difference between FGM, corseting, castrati, footbinding and circumcision i…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:43 AM
-8

Jesus. You guys are really trying too hard. It's circumcision. Lots of people have had it happen. You were a baby. Lots of bad things happen when you are baby, intentional or not. You fall, get sick, your parents abuse you or are negligent, or they aren't and have you circumcised and treat you well. The myriad of factors and variables that go into how you develop and what you become won't boil down to circumcision. Getting all bent out of shape over this is absurd. There are far more important t…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:39 AM
-8

In comparison to the approximately 150 million males in America. Yeeeaaaah that's pretty small dude. More male children probably die from miscarriage and other stuff more than botched circumcisions.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:14 AM
1

You find one who doesn't stop being interesting. One that interests you intellectually or emotionally. Start digging deeper with the girls you meet. Attraction is the first leg in the journey that can lead to a meaningful LTR. There are those who I have read about here who aren't just attracting every girl they can. It's a wonderful novelty before it's ultimately internalized but what some people don't realize is that there are hierarchies of desires, goals, and futures we may want to reach for.…
/r/seduction22/03/11 06:51 AM
2

Goddamn tides!!! fist-shaking
/r/seduction16/03/11 02:10 AM
1

I'm amazed at how people are downvoting me for this. In reality that's where this question belongs. It's quite explicit.
/r/seduction16/03/11 01:31 AM
0

Specific questions about seduction and pick-up should be directed to AskSeddit, not doing so could result in your post being downvoted or removed. That's from the sidebar. But, whatever.
/r/seduction16/03/11 12:44 AM
-5

This belongs in AskSeddit. I don't think it belongs here.
/r/seduction15/03/11 09:53 PM
1

Totally agree. My point was to dispell the notion that a neg alone is a singular mechanism. It's a part of a dynamic. One which we learn as we venture out and make mistakes with girls and women.
/r/seduction10/03/11 12:17 AM
2

I fucking like you.
/r/seduction09/03/11 11:40 PM
1

I like that.
/r/seduction09/03/11 11:39 PM
2

Really though it is just semantics. The word negging and it's connotative origins are.. well... negative. Teasing playfully is negging more or less. Redefining it in terms of lowering value and disqualifying are just there to make it easier for guys to wrap their heads around.
/r/seduction09/03/11 11:37 PM
1

The verbal jab isn't the sole variable. It's body language and how she already perceives you. It's social dynamics for a reason.
/r/seduction09/03/11 11:35 PM
1

Depends on how you drink the piss.
/r/seduction09/03/11 11:31 PM
1

It's partially dependent on personality too. It's just that a lot of guys who never get out and talk to girls immediately objectify girls based on looks. The more you talk to girls, after having developed confidence an interesting life, etc., the more you will realize that the "HB" scale will be based off their personality. None but the shallowest invest emotionally in looks alone. The more you just get out there and do it, the more you will realize what you're really attracted to.
/r/seduction09/03/11 11:27 PM
1

Hindsight is history, true, but it seems that peering into your own history is part of the game when it comes to appreciating our own behavior and the motives behind it. If we never looked back then we might never learn. During the course of events we are generally blind as to how we behave but, again, we must evaluate the past in order to correct the behavior. It's a generally accepted rule in therapy that we peer into our own past to move ourselves forward. And I simply won't accept the fact t…
/r/seduction28/02/11 07:57 AM
1

I'm not even sure how to define where this all went wrong. Women know what they want, if they didn't we'd be totally lost. Rational re-definition of what they want to better understand how women think and how they communicate is what goes on here. She's attempting to bridge a gap. Perhaps an attempt that on first try wasn't utterly successful but she is trying. You're replies and comments also sound expository which lends itself to being objective. Saying she is unable to understand her own deep…
/r/seduction28/02/11 04:12 AM
1

Most people don't understand why they like things. People don't understand why red makes men and women more attractive. Everyday language isn't designed to elicit the why's of things we do, it's designed to label it. Plus the individual responses people will have toward these things vary dependent on their internal, connotative definitions of certain words. People color definitions of alot of words all the time in the pursuit of a larger meaning within a framework they've built in their mind. No…
/r/seduction28/02/11 03:34 AM
4

The one show that always impresses me with regards to a guy who seems like a natural. Hank Moody. Californication. Fuckin' awesome show.
/r/seduction28/02/11 02:01 AM
5

Awesome post. There certainly is truth to the fact that introverts need seclusion at certain points to process events. Extroverts seem to process certain types of information through the interaction itself.
/r/seduction28/02/11 01:52 AM
2

Everyone has to start somewhere though. People will get caught up consciously in the vernacular and the technical aspects of it but what should be happening is internalization like Tofu said. PUA is just learning how to communicate, most specifically with women.
/r/seduction24/02/11 09:00 PM
3

I wish I could upvote this more good sir. Thank you for for sharing.
/r/seduction24/02/11 08:44 PM
13

This isn't literal advice. It's about breaking the mold you are so comfortable in and doing the things you haven't. The extreme nature of the statements is to make you think about how not badly things can go.
/r/seduction24/02/11 08:26 PM
2

I concur.
/r/seduction22/02/11 05:30 AM
6

Upvoted for awesome.
/r/seduction22/02/11 04:27 AM
1

Its more about not giving her what she wants when she wants it. Many guys will give HB's what they want. It's a symptom of their beauty more or less. It contributes to your being a standout, someone exciting who's not willing to bend to her will. Alot of it is context too. If you have her isolated and she's already distinctly shown attraction to you take it to a new level of comfort.
/r/seduction22/02/11 04:27 AM
1

Nice one! I hope the date goes well for you.
/r/seduction18/02/11 10:19 PM
7

I played that through my head. Definitely builds sexual mystery and tension.
/r/seduction18/02/11 09:44 PM
7

It all rings true. All the aspects you speak of scream alpha male.
/r/seduction18/02/11 07:32 PM
11

Proceed.
/r/seduction17/02/11 08:59 PM
3

3 second rule. Next time you see a girl that you find exceptionally attractive or cute or red-headed or busty, tattooed, pierced, on and on and on. Stop. Don't think about the outcome of what your friends might think, don't think about the outcome of how she might react, don't think about the outcome of the interaction. Don't think about anything. Say hi. That's it. 3 seconds might change your life.
/r/seduction17/02/11 03:51 AM
1

I do this all the time. I've been reading alot recently on seddit about AA and how to overcome it. Next time I go out I'm just going to bite the bullet and do it. I've lived far too long in the shadow of my own self-doubt. And of all things just manning up and talking to a few girls just might be the key to opening up the rest of my life.
/r/seduction07/02/11 10:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter