TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Educational-War-9418 Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by Educational-War-9418 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Lifetime satisfaction seems to be a pretty well-researched subject. For all people, male or female, married or not, happiness over lifetime has an "U" shape. On avarage, people are most unhappy in midlife. I guess that's due to stress in midlife, a feeling of getting old and the realization that some things won't happen in your life. The thought of roads not taken can cause grief. I think that's why the late 30ies to mid 40ies are sometimes a difficult time for women (but also men) who originall…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 05:21 PM
3

No, I think women are often doing better post divorce than men as their primary goal was to have kids while for men they wanted a wife (and kids).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:54 PM
6

You should expand your study and have a heart-to-heart with women who have a marriage and kids. I bet just as many as them will tell you they're miserable, too. Some people are just deeply unhappy (sometimes) and it seems to have little to do with the specific circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:49 PM
–

Until about 25 I was still finding out who I am. I think it would have been disastrous to make any permanent decisions (aka marriage) before that. 25 is a perfectly good age to go looking for a long-term partner for many people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:27 PM
0

Men really need an emancipation movement (no sarcasm).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:05 PM
7

Yeah, don't leave us hanging, I really want to know now!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:02 PM
5

Relatively speaking, yes, that's how it works. But, I guess, women now have expectations that exceed the available male dating pool. "Avarage guy" isn't "good enough" to an average woman but "not sufficient". He's got an average job and appearance and average ambitions to raise shared kids (aka not pulling his weight at home), that's not good enough nowadays, that's unattractive. Your competition isn't (only) the top guys, it's her ideals and standards and her willingness to stay single if she d…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 08:40 AM
0

Nature decided no one gets rights as a baseline. Nature didn't decide anything about rights, it just is. Some men then granted themselves the right to vote. In the beginning, there was nature and humans living in it. All humans collected the berries in the field and hunted in the forest. It was only after a while that some humans (the strongest/most influential) decided that not all individuals would be allowed to do so anymore. By giving themselves the rights to do so, they negated others the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 10:15 PM
0

I think that’s the first area of disagreement. Rights don’t exist in nature. So they had to be granted before they could be taken away, so how were they originally granted? Correct, rights don't exist in nature, they're a social construct. People with the most power (via violence or help from others) decided what is right and imposed that decision on others. It wasn't nature that decided that women shouldn't have the right to vote; men did. Take nationalism for example, one can be proud of their…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:17 PM
5

Oh, I'm convinced he believes in the law of the strongest - as long as it serves his group. I can't count how often I've read "women didn’t fight for their rights, they were handed to them by men" as if women had to be grateful for that act of mercy, negating that the same rights were first taken away from them by men. In the 2000s, in some Western nations, children "gained" the right to an education without corporal punishment. What a generosity of the adults! But, who had decided in the first …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 06:48 PM
6

So his argument is: Take away anyone's voting power as long as it doesn't end in violence? As long as they don't overthrow the government, the sovereign is in his rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 11:01 AM
3

Dang, an alpha widower.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:08 PM
–

Yeah, you know, it's not always as nefarious. At least about 15-20 years ago, when I grew up, society was very much focused on sex. There was a lot of pressure to have sex, as it was supposedly the be all, end all. And if you really loved your boyfriend, you "gave" him sex. So, who's manipulated in this scenario? Believe me when I say that this mindset of "you ought to have sex!" is very harmful. It would be a lot better if people weren't pushed into having/providing sex they don't intrinsically…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:37 PM
2

People who marry under age 25 have the highest divorce rates though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 06:11 PM
1

If he had the chance to fuck a super attractive woman and did, great for him. It tells us zero about their long term compatibility - which is important for long term relationships. Of course, if he constantly compares me to his hot fling, that is a problem. But if it's just a fun memory and he treats me well, why would I bother?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:52 PM
2

😭😙👌🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:29 PM
1

If you're really curious, you might want to read stuff on the dynamics of abusive relationships. It's a well-known fact that many victims of domestic abuse need several attempts to free themselves of their abuser as the abuser isn't abusive all of the time. At times, they're also kind and caring, which is a real mindfuck - especially, for people who grew up in dysfunctional families and never really learned what truly healthy relationships look like (this doesn't only afflict the socially depriv…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:00 PM
2

I think we should differentiate between the legal definition of rape/sexual assault and sexually abusive behavior. You are correct that in many "grey" instances it won't be possible for a court to prove that it was rape. As frustrating as it is, this "innocent unless proven guilty" approach is correct. However, there's no question that a lot of behaviors are sexually abusive, even if not punishable by law: - Repeatedly asking for/waking your partner up for sex, unless the other gives in (sleep d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 10:06 PM
9

There's an easy solution: tax payer funded child support for all kids. But, most guys don't support that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 01:02 AM
4

It's crazy that you compare women rejecting men because of their looks (no deception involved) to men lying to women to get sex (willful betrayal). At least, make it somewhat comparable, e.g. women leading guys on to receive free stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 12:14 AM
1

So, maybe, it isn't a bait and switch? But that she lost the attraction during the relationship, after fights and picking up his dirty underwear? Why is that never considered by red pill guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 09:09 PM
1

Because only the best fathers gain sole custody. It's selection bias par excellence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 12:45 AM
5

Yes. A dick is a dick and if I like how he uses it, what's missing?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 08:06 PM
5

Take my upvote for the rare introspection! More people should ask themselves why they seek sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 04:33 PM
2

Not per say
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:43 PM
6

So, in your example, the woman does her job as she raises the kid as a single mom. The man however, as a deadbeat dad, doesn't do his job as a parent (he neither parents nor pays child support). But yet you want other women to foot the bill when a man doesn't step up to his responsibility. This makes no sense, even in your own logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 02:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter