TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EffectiveMarch1858 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by EffectiveMarch1858 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

She needs the chase to feel like she's dating up and if she's not dating up she's not interested. This is a biological fact that cannot be denied. I think this is nonsense
/r/ExRedPill17/07/25 05:32 PM
–

The huge upswing in autism diagnosis includes many people who are essentially just socially under developed, shy, anti social, overly anxious, have moderate sensory issues etc. The gap between the above cases of autism and many new diagnosis is extremely stark. They all get covered under the "spectrum" but when the range is that large it starts looking like a nonsense categorization Sorry, I don't really understand what your contention is. I think it's true that high functioning autism can be mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:33 AM
–

May I ask why you don't think it is real? Surely you must experience being different to a lot of people?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:13 AM
1

you are not arguing in good faith. or, you’re just low IQ. How so? There is no category of women that exclusively finds short men attractive and rejects tall men. How does this read as a negative to you? It looks like a strong empirical claim to me. There will always be outliers Above is a generalisation. If he meant to say some or most, he would have, but he chose not to. I wouldn't challenge him if I didn't think it read as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 07:11 PM
-3

Which one of these studies shows that it's impossible for a women to only like short guys? There is no category of women that exclusively finds short men attractive and rejects tall men. I think, for you to be able to show this to be true, you would have to have a running tally on all women alive, I doubt you have this. Strong claims are difficult to substantiate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:27 PM
-3

So, this is a very strong empirical claim. What's your evidence that this is the case? "Tall" is also a vague term, what does it mean in this context?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 01:42 PM
0

What's the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 11:29 AM
-1

I think to suggest there is some feature that is objectively attractive, is to say all people who gaze on that feature would find it attractive. Can you give me an examine of one of these features? (And then provide evidence that all people find it attractive, since this is a very strong empirical claim)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 11:00 AM
1

Most. You can easily check this for yourself, just read feminists texts/literature. If you're looking for a scientific paper that proves that feminism is not diverse when it comes to men then you're probably not gonna find it. Those who write those kind of scientific papers are usually themselves feminist, and holds exactly the kind of attitudes that I disagree with. Of course they use the "feminism is diverse" to protect themselves from criticism, this is just what people do unfortunately. Your…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:29 PM
1

Logically, making a group of people believe that there is another group of people ruthlessly oppressing them results in some members of that group ingaging in hostility and hatred to the othered outgroup, sometimes leading to physical violence, and more often in the case of feminists, to subtler forms of bigotry such as trying and supporting to change societal institutions in such a way that men are discriminated against and become powerless against abuse. Sexist affirmative action policies, sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:26 PM
1

In my opinion, the accuracy and moral acceptability of such a generalization depends on how similar or diverse the group in question is and the aspect of said group that is being talked about. Groups can simultaneously be considered both diverse and uniform, depending on what aspect of said group you are looking at. I argue that feminism is very uniform when it comes to those aspects relevant to men's issues, and those are exactly the aspects that non-feminists critisize. Feminism is very divers…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:25 PM
6

I don't agree with this, because being a feminist is a choice. Generalizing a group based on ideological grounds is widely different from generalizing based on an immutable characteristic they can't remove from themselves. Already answered this point in another comment. No, it seems generalisable. "All left wingers should be responsible for the actions of some left wingers", "all football fans should be responsible for the actions of some football fans", "everybody who likes chocolate should be …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:25 PM
10

No, it seems generalisable. "All left wingers should be responsible for the actions of some left wingers", "all football fans should be responsible for the actions of some football fans", "everybody who likes chocolate should be responsible for the actions of some people who like chocolate", etc, I think all of these examples are analogous because OP didn't specify this in their initial post. Perhaps they don't actually hold this view, but I was only using the information available to me. I've a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:48 PM
7

This post seems to be contingent on the idea that all feminists should be responsible for the actions of some feminists. If this is what OP is suggesting then surely this would be generalisable to all groups of people, for example, if you believe this, then surely you think all white people should be responsible for the actions of some white people? This makes no sense to me. Feminism isn't a bastion, and there is a lot of disagreement on a lot of topics within feminism itself, to deny this reek…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 01:51 PM
10

most women just respond to the male loneliness issue with "oh boo hoo. man up" energy. Generalisations again. What does this even mean? Who are you referring to? How many women think this? You are just going into empirical territory here, and doing that without evidence is flawed reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:37 PM
32

As is so often the case here, people make bizarre generalisations about whole groups of people without realising that these kinds of claims can't be evaluated without evidence. Take the following section for instance. The answer to gender issues is not for men to be good boys. It's not "he for she", men supporting women etc, because women have shown that they won't return the favor by fighting for men's issues. Feminists have said it themselves that they are not obligated to fight for men so men…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:06 PM
7

I'm suggesting that most progressive women are like this, yes. Ok, so this is definitely an empirical claim then. Can you provide an argument supported by evidence to show this claim to be true? You're just saying nonsense otherwise. One of the core tenants of progressivism is: "silence is violence". If you're not constantly speaking out against misogyny and oppression, then you're complicit in it. So logically most women who are actually true to their progressive beliefs are very vocal, zealous…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:08 PM
3

There's so much to unpack in this post, for a start, it's just loads of empirical claims. Empirical claims require an argument supported with evidence to be true or probably true, so without this, you can really just discard them as complete nonsense since it' impossible to evaluate them otherwise. Following is an example in the first section. Meanwhile, progressive women fundamentally despise the male gender as a whole, and view men as essentially defective females. Do you mean all or most prog…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:48 PM
1

It seems like you could be doing a motte and bailey fallacy here, by moving from a strong claim to a weaker one which is easier to defend. It's also possible you just didn't thoroughly write out your whole opinion on the topic, since you weren't expecting pushback, It's difficult to say. I took "OOP needs to learn to mask if he wants a normie girlfriend" to mean OOP can't let their real personality come through at any point if they want a chance at getting a partner, that's the position I was at…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 05:42 PM
2

Do you give the same advice to your friends then? Do you think they should mask if they want to date NTs?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 08:19 AM
7

OOP needs to learn to mask if he wants a normie girlfriend or find another autistic woman This is dog shit advice, in my opinion, because the mask is going to slip as your partner gets to know you, you would essentially be lying to this person. It's of course likely harder to date as an unmasked ND person, but that's the only way you will have someone get to know the real you. ND people tend to attract ND people, you don't need to mask in front of ND people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 07:03 AM
1

So you can't provide evidence then? Can we agree this claim is nonsense then? Why are you making nonsensical claims? I know loads of nice people who are feminist. How many feminists do you actually know? Is it possible you are the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 08:20 PM
3

The claim is that the majority of feminists use it as an insult, this isn't true without evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 07:50 PM
0

What does "majority" mean to you then? Does it mean, at least one person? If so, that's a really fucking confusing definition of the word. Usually people take the majority to mean over 50%. If this is what you mean, it's not clear that this is the case without evidence. Can you provide evidence or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 07:47 PM
-3

The majority, yeah. It's an insult and used to shame and humiliate people. Can you provide evidence to substantiate this claim then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 07:38 PM
4

Like the first feminist POTUS? Mind you, no single feminist called him out on it. I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean? I am suggesting majority of feminists tolerate small dick shaming. So what's your evidence for this then? I'm not sure any of your previous links substantiate this claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 07:33 PM
29

Feminism is hardly a bastion, you get stupid people in any large group of people. It's not clear to me what the point of this post is, are you suggesting a majority or all feminists shame men with small dicks?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 06:58 PM
27

This is such a weak reply. This is a debate sub, so you should really give your reasoning why you disagree with this person's opinion. I think you're losing on the rhetoric here because this comes across as though you aren't able to counter their points, is this the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 06:16 AM
-2

If you think your post is reasonable, surely you should be ok with the following too, as your belief seems to be that the actions of a few people within a group are indicative of all people in that group. ​ I’m kind of a racist, but I’m not sure if that’s exactly a healthy worldview to have or if it’s even 100% correct. I’ve met a few black people in the past year or so that have actually been decent people. And I reconnected with a few black male family members who are actually pretty chill and…
/r/ExRedPill19/03/24 11:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter