TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Effective_Count_1811 Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by Effective_Count_1811 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Her hostility towards dude for developing feelings for her, after getting to know her tells us two things about Lil bro. He is not winning any height pageants He is likely recessed
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/25 02:35 PM
1

Because I don’t believe you that they weren’t Stacies. why? Ive dated a couple stacies, but it wasn't the worse shit testers. The "mostly mid" one had highest body count so she probably got used by som gigachad and couldn't take anything less as serious anymore🤷‍♂️ also its women who underrate guys, view most of us as physically repulsive and just engage for supplemental resources and conformity sake And if men don’t like manipulative women, then why do they keep choosing them? like asking why i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:30 PM
1

wow. what kind of person does this? LMAO What youre doing is like me insisting you're blonde after you told me repeatedly that youre brunette Already said they were no stacies, this like the 3rd time and you just ignore it. maybe...IF they were stacies, maybe I'd have put up with them for a little longer, but maybe not. Probably not even. No one likes manipulative people, they stay with them due to lack of options or because the sex is good, or because they have money. Similarly, women don't lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:57 PM
1

what does this mean? I just said they weren't. Unless that means something to you that im unaware of. The two worst shit testers I've been with, I'd describe one as "cute" and the other, "mostly mid" The only one who I'd consider attractive enough to be a stacy is the one who did no shit testing. Like I said, its about how the woman perceives the guy she is with. If SHE thinks he is hot, no shit tests, the relationship isnt tiring for the guy. If SHE thinks only gigachad is good enough, you get …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:25 PM
1

this subreddit barely scratches the surface on anything beyond early 2000s knowledge. and redpill is bluepill with extra steps. Id have laughed as a teen hearing that bs because my friends and I had more experience as teens than what I'd imagine someone sheltered enough to call themselves "red pill" has ever seen, not even through the eyes of someone they know. If I didnt spell things out, and I'll say it again Switch the scenario around, where women are expressing their preferences in the face …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 11:09 AM
1

yes, lol. and IF they did do it, got negative reactions, and did anything other than ignore it or pretend its a nice thing, they would face further criticism. People wouldn't take kindly to them demanding others praise them the way their equivalent women get away with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:49 AM
1

none of the ones who did shit testing were "unusually hot". One of them I'd say is "cute" and the other "mostly mid". It's not about their looks, its about how they percieve the guys looks. The better they think he looks, the less BS in general, including shit tests. That's when they're careful to hide red flags and only show that kind, empathetic side that we pretend is the default. ironically, the one who did not shit test me ever is, in my opinion, actually hot, much better looking than the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:34 AM
1

Yes. Especially when they feel like they could do better and silently resent the guy. Shittests are one way that manifests. The girlfriends who never did that were the ones who seemed to be most into my looks. One even said that I was so much better looking than her (I thought we were looksmatched) and I dont think thats coincidence. And how is it "hate" to report on observing that ? I know you, and probably most women, HATE that some guys are perceptive enough to realize that and similar things…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 06:49 AM
–

Switch the scenario around, where women are expressing their preferences in the face of attrempts to make them negotiate them to be all-inclusive, and the ridiculousness is clear: [Women comment online on pics a short bald obese man posts that they dont think he is physically attractive, recommend he go to gym.] Men shouting about womanosphere content going mainstream😮 ... LOL "mAnOsPhErE" now means "men whose preferences aren't negotiable and/or all-inclusive"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:42 AM
1

As someone who used to game all the time, you have it bass ackwards. Most people doing that don't choose to game instead of socializing. They do that because they either dont have time to socialize/are too worn out from other obligations, or they have no one to socialize with. I was only gaming all the time because no one I would hang out with was ever free to hang out with when I was off work due to a weird work schedule with many hours that didn't give me any opportunities to meet people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:34 AM
2

LOL If I wore a green hazmat suit and a facemask, and said I was a "green man", and someone said "No. Your skin tone is similar in color to a Hershey bar. You're a 'black' man, not 'green man' Would that be u/Effective_Count_1811 HATE?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:27 AM
1

The only reasons guys would relegate a woman to hookup status or pull the manipulative tactic of acting out being in a relationship temporarily is when they spot too many red flags (particularly, ones pertaining to her ability to be serious) OR the woman isn't attractive to him and he only involved due to convenience/lack of options.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:21 AM
1

If you knew people in general and had experience with women, you'd have experienced that at least a couple times and seen it many times (woman being direct, making first move, escalating things, being sexually forward etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 12:21 AM
1

Why? Who are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:52 PM
2

Im a man and use the words "males" and "women" to see if anyone gets performatively upset at the supposedly dehumanizing nature of the word "male" like they do when the word "female" is used But I've yet to see that happen LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:04 PM
-2

lol I wouldn't have figured that
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:02 PM
4

males: "no" = not respecting women, man bad women: "no" = respecting themselves, woman good this subreddit probably IDK didnt read comments
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 02:11 PM
–

Im here to help you, bro. I'm a billionaire, 6'9, and 420lb of pure muscle. Knowing this helps you help yourself improooove because all this help im helping you with is very helpful to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 01:25 PM
–

What i was originally talking about was the common kind of manipulation most males outside of internet spaces like this accept while laying down. Manipulation such as "A real man date single mom." Guys just accept the notion that a 'real' man does [A-Z, whatever arbitrary thing women want them to do, as though they're merely trained beasts] You understood earlier, I thought, as you already mentioned how it was just like that for women in the past. But i suppose now that you bring up gender roles…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 04:42 PM
–

Im not talking about pursuing. Im talking about willfully laying down to be manipulated, being too afraid to even speak candidly about it the way you acknowledge how it was in the past for women without dancing around the subject. So are you equating being submissive towards blatant manipulation tactics with "pursuing"? That's a new one, LOL. "Just pursue her, bro. A rEaL man would give her 10k no questions, bro. What don't you PuRsUE?"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 03:37 PM
–

How is it that it works so flawlessly on most guys nowadays? It seems social pressure and lack of choice are the same driving factors in males typically bending over backward to conform to the same thing nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 03:27 PM
1

bro throwing around terms he heard for no reason at all. Imma do it too. (military) tactical issue
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 12:00 PM
3

Those guys are coping and would begin fighting one another for a chance at even getting those women phone number. And as people like to say whenever it suits their narrative, "The internet isn't real life, bro."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 11:59 AM
–

nah. it's just as obnoxious. They be trying to to manipulate males to do equivalently repulsive things like date people they dont find attractive or who have incompatible lifestyles. Don't shoot the messenger just coz the message uncomfortable to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 07:10 AM
–

not overthinking at all. Its blatant. Same kind of cultural marketing/pandering to coax males to comply with female whim, to be subservient LOL doesnt take a genius to see it. Don't worry though most guys too afraid to admit how it is. Business as usual isn't under threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 06:41 AM
4

Imagine if males could pull off the slick marketing to manipulate women to deal with things they'd rather not put up with the way women have effective marketing to manipulate males for the same purpose: Woman up and be a real woman. Step up to the plate and cook for your mans every meal and do the dishes too. So what if he has side chick? That's males autonomy and healthcare issue! Don't like that? Well, dont be surprised if he leaves you for a woman who isn't a toxic excuse for a human being! L…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 06:11 AM
14

What in the projecting is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 06:03 AM
-1

Don't be ridiculous. Not that I agree with the other person, But it's typically a tactic of women to blatantly pretend that the WAY a person says something or a person having a "wrong" emotional state negates the content of what they say. So be better. We shouldn't slide into playing those dumbass games designed to obscure rational though from coming into discussion LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 06:01 AM
1

I would figure the average person having kids has no concern for anything that deep, like things that affect QOL for their children. So long as the kid is alive they just pat themselves on the back and are mostly clueless about any real issues children face because they dont have the capacity to see them as fully formed, independent, sentient beings. So no, I doubt "It's good enough for me its good enough for yooou." mentality havers have the capacity to speculate how height and face could affec…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 05:58 AM
-4

I dont think it's egocentrism. I think it's pure ignorance. Guys taking women and the performative males who parrot women in hopes of gaining favor with them seriously, at face value, when they downplay the importance of physical attraction. So they actually believe there are hoops they can jump through that will make them attractive because that is what most women (and males) preach. Mark thinks he's sufficiently jumped through all the hoops that women and blue/redpill males said he must jump t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:04 PM
9

They dont understand, that being like: "If you dont shut up and do what annoys me the least since i can't deal with occanal mild inconvenience of having to hear you, I'll call you names! ME! You dont want that, do ya? Now be quiet!" doesn't work on everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 04:55 PM
1

Also, they lie because men play along out of desperation. Men are tacitly taught that unquestionably going along with whatever women say leads to women finding them attractive and are reluctant to test whether that is true or not. Men can't lie and be performative about behaviors rarely seen in reality from men being the norm because women wouldn't go along with it the same way men do when women do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 03:40 PM
–

you cant even comprehend that women have preferences is the same as men having preferences, LOL comprehend? Can you comprehend that women have nearly universal requirements, and men have widely varying prefrences. Such is the case with preferring taller than average height males.. basically a universal requirement women place on males. meanwhile, men's preferences vary from guy to guy, such as when one of my friends said, "What is wrong with you?" when I said a woman he didn't prefer was attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 03:05 PM
2

YOU, obviously. I said: "Why does random men who you dont know complaining online strike such a nerve with you though? I genuinely dont get it. You're doing the exact same thing they do, except your complaining about a different subject, one that doesn't even tangibly affect you. I find most humans are eager to complain about things that dont affect them, and its just weird to me. I dont comprehend that behaviour any more than I understand the meaning behind dogs barks." and rather than answerin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:46 PM
2

sure, but only when "bitter" = "asks question that makes me uncomfortable"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:43 PM
2

Why does random men who you dont know complaining online strike such a nerve with you though? I genuinely dont get it. You're doing the exact same thing they do, except your complaining about a different subject, one that doesn't even tangibly affect you. I find most humans are eager to complain about things that dont affect them, and its just weird to me. I dont comprehend that behaviour any more than I understand the meaning behind dogs barks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:33 PM
2

no. just pointing out that youre whining about whining taking place because its not something okay to whine about in your opinion, as if youre the arbiter of whats okay and what isn't, full on egomaniac.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:30 PM
2

I think i dont care what anyone does so long as it isn't tangibly affecting me in a negative way. So its equally weird doung what the people youre complaining about are doing and what you are doing IMHO.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:26 PM
2

Never said they were. Im saying its silly for you to whine relentlessly about guys who begrudgingly have to pay for companionship. Who cares if they whine about it? Its just silly. It would be like me stabbing my toe and crying about amputees who dont like their predicament. Just wouldn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:19 PM
0

Full on egomaniac, why should they accept something just because you think they should? I seriously doubt you can comprehend what im saying, that its silly af for some rando to whine about how they cant police people's complaints effectively enough, so I'll just leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:16 PM
0

full on egomaniac, why should they stop complaining just because you don't like it? People are sooo weird!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:12 PM
4

LMAO "How dare you whine about handing over money to supplement my income. Money isn't enough! I wanna see you smile when you pay!"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:00 PM
2

teeeheee people are complicated people change teeeeheee
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter