TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Efficient-Football Archive

View 9 posts and 54 comments by Efficient-Football on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6816

FeminismEfficient-Football/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:56 PM
1414

Efficient-Football/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:29 PM
171

FeminismEfficient-Football/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:07 PM
69

Legal RightsEfficient-Football/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:42 PM
59

Marriage/ChildrenEfficient-Football/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:40 AM
28

False AccusationEfficient-Football/r/MensRights02/03/20 12:29 PM
26

Efficient-Football/r/MensRights13/03/20 02:50 AM
26

Efficient-Football/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:26 PM
18

Edu./Occu.Efficient-Football/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:55 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

the only question is that before or after americas eventual collapse and revolution? hopefully before or you run the risk of that pendulum swinging at a time and having a patriarchal theocracy
/r/MensRights14/03/20 05:48 PM
3

nobody is defending Weinstein. He's a scumbag who definitely used his money and power to influence women. defending against false rape accusations is not defending Weinstein.. if you wouldn't defend these things against people you don't like then you've already lost the battle for people that you do like likee
/r/MensRights14/03/20 05:45 PM
18

I just want to point out that in the context of the movie her character is an FBI agent investigating the kid for money laundering that makes it even worsee
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:18 PM
2

why does he have a better haircut than me?
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:17 PM
1

it even pay you a little
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:01 PM
2

too but I also say that men who buy that fans only content are stupid. why would you pay for porn when there's so much of it for free? literally anything you can think of you can Google and it's there. No matter how fucked up.. try it. I don't get why people would pay for fans only content. there's nothing even special about it it's not like it's tailored to you. I can understand something like a prostitute where you're paying a woman specifically to focus on you and have sex with you. I can eve…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:59 PM
2

potassium is based I'm female supremacy. if you like a quality you're an egalitarian that's the word for it. feminism is female supremacy. The difference between egalitarianism feminists is that egalitarian want equality but feminists they looked at a country that at a time was run by a patriarchy and instead of wanting equality they wanted to reverse it so that women were on top.. nothing nothing further symbolizes that and Justice Ruth bader ginsburg's comment that she would only be satisfied …
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:57 PM
5

it's not surprising that men in high business positions refuse to be in the same room as a woman if they're alone CEOs have begun refusing to mentor women because it would require them to be alone with a woman and they refuse to have one-on-one meetings with women unless there's a witness present. not because they hate women but it's just a defense tactics. The last thing they need is some woman coming forward and destroying their career with false accusations because she didn't get a raise or s…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:55 PM
4

he way it's set up is basically to incentivize women to make false accusations. true or false it incentivizes them to make accusations. there is massive reward for making an accusation regardless of whether it's true or not there's almost no reason not to and there's no punishment if it turns out to be false statistically women are likely to lie about rape. and then the government sets it up so that they're incentivised to. That's called institutional sexism. women have institutional power. ther…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:53 PM
6

we live in a matriarchy. women have institutional power over men in female supremacist world..
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:51 PM
-8

Bloomberg was definitely a Democrat. You're just so delusional you think that anybody you don't like is a republican LOL. maybe it's just the Democrats in general are bad people? Did you ever consider that? of course not. Democrats are bad people. regardless of what you think about Bernie Democrats are bad people and they support bad things. Bloomberg was a Democrat just like mitt Romney was a Democrat and John McCain was a Democrat. you can either accept that or you ca
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:51 PM
5

it's not about teaching lies. it's about Hillary realizing that the majority of her base was sexist. They hate men. and still promoting misandry to her misandristic bas a good campaign strategy and I'm not making it up. an NYU study found with the majority of Hillary supporters voted for her because she was a woman.. https://www.dailywire.com/news/what-if-trump-and-hillary-swapped-genders-james-barrett
/r/MensRights13/03/20 03:13 AM
6

estimates The Innocence Project has estimated that between 2.3 percent and 5 percent of all US prisoners are innocent. With the number of incarcerated Americans being approximately 2.4 millio by that estimate as many as 120000 people
/r/MensRights13/03/20 03:00 AM
27

he literally lost money over this. track your actions and ehrs actions cost him money. and his reputation at the company and based on the severity of his punishment it seems that it would only get worse from there. if she realizes she has that kind of power and decides to explain it it could result in a demotion not to mention the effect she has on the rest of the team. taking action isn't retaliation to Katie. taking action is protecting himself and protecting his team who have had to take days…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:22 PM
20

no such thing as reverse sexism. it's just sexism. wich is illegal
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:11 PM
2

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/workplace-retaliation-employee-rights-30217.html
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:10 PM
5

https://www.schwinlaw.com/uncategorized/2017/06/20/win-discrimination-retaliation-wrongful-termination-cases/
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:54 PM
16

https://www.businessinsider.com/what-to-do-when-hr-ignores-your-complaints-2017-2
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:54 PM
71

if they discriminate against you for taking legal action that is also illegal. They cannot try to punish you for filing a complaint. A lawyer will be able to tell you that explain it better the thing is you can't just keep your head down and move on. these things happen all too often and it will continue you were discriminated against. you have rights. you need to utilize those rights because that's why they're there. keeping your head down and allowing this rampant sexism continue will not make…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:48 PM
50

it sounds like HR committed sexism against YOU I would say that URI course would be to submit a complaint to whoever supervises HR and kind of imply that if it's not rectified you will be going to the eeoc or other govt agency sure being discriminated against as a man. as it is clearly evident that your gender played a role in the fact that they refuse to listen to your evidence refuse to even hear your argument and immediately sided with her based on gender alone history discrimination and you …
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:42 PM
1

so ur a soyboy male feminist the lowest type of feminist lol u think women are "under attack" all the time lmao u FREAKED when trump said "she was bleeding from everywhere" lmao
/r/MensRights10/03/20 06:35 PM
0

not here woman. u women need to learn to just be quiet now watch u get triggered over that statement Because in reality u dont want equality. u just hate menn
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:37 PM
1

the loophole 22 that they found catch 22 that they found catch 22 that they found is that they used corporations to Target conservatives. Knowing that conservatives are mostly corporate shells who would never support much-needed regulation just like unregulated oil companies unregulated food manufacturing companies and unregulated what are companies unregulated social media is dangerous. we need regulations which are just better defined as laws. big corporations need to be rained in. it's a catc…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:35 PM
0

it states that it was going to be reviewed by the regular moderators. who clearly agreed with it
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:33 PM
2

r/fuckthraltright it's mostly just anti Ben Shapiro posts and attacks on Jordan Peterson. basically on any given week they're just attacking whoever the most famous mainstream conservative is that week. almost nothing to do with the alt right.. r/politicalhumor mostly unfunny nonsense posted by left-wing troll accounts..
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:32 PM
8

most accusations of rape are false according to available data its AT LEAST 60% are false. likely more this isn't surprising when you realize how easy it is to make a false accusation and the fact that there are basically no repercussions for doing so. any woman could do it. not only are there no repercussions but there's actually an incentive to me. He's Asians as most women that do end up better off than before. They get phrase from other feminists about how brave they are. sometimes they get …
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:27 PM
1

the way he words it siggests hes a troll
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:22 PM
5

or its a troll
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:21 PM
1

its the d*ck Illuminati!
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:20 PM
2

fyi dont use Wikipedia. its full of paid shill editors for the far left thst protect the leftwing agenda i (and MANY others) experience trying to edit articles to add relevant information that follows the rules and the editors delete it because it goes against their narrative. it makes sense when you realize that Wikipedia founder called Trump a cult its not a reliable source use infogalactic for a more non-partisan take
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:17 PM
11

because cnn said so
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:12 PM
-1

Wikipedia has a standard and it's real based that disallows reliable sources. you can look it up in the Wikipedia heading rules that they only allow unreliable sources like Washington Post New York times CNN etc. up to the point that they have band mainstream reliable sources such as Breitbart and the gateway pundit while only allowing unreliable sources like Huffington Post salon etc but I do find that you would probably not trust an article from Breitbart even if the information was well-sourc…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 11:07 PM
-5

LOL Wikipedia and rational wiki? 2 far left propaganda websites are your evidence? Wikipedia is a far-left propaganda website with mostly false information protected by far-left editors and rational wiki is an offshoot of Wikipedia built by even farther left editors who were mad that Wikipedia wasn't far left enough even Wikipedia's founder has made many anti Trump statements and their editors persist and protecting he debunked conspiracy theories about trump that volunteers try to correct try a…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 10:40 PM
-1

none of that is true
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:58 PM
-7

imagine hating a ehite guy for being whitee
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:58 PM
9

aren't you feminists the ones who get triggered over every little thing? A guy looks at you funny and you blog about it for weeks? trumps statement "she was bleeding from everywhere" sentt you guys into a frenzy for a month lmao a guy on twitter said simply "women sit down" and u guys went NUTS lmao and that's not even counting the other times like when you guys went nuts because there were no black people in the movie Dunkirk.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:57 PM
3

but it's not only true for them and this applies to everything. anytime I suggest using focus group tested tactics even ones that are used by mainstream political parties there's always that opposition because some people would rather lose as long as they can collect their pearls
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:55 PM
3

realistically because a lot of these movements like men's rights or anti-establishment conservatism etc don't generally have good marketing strategist. The left is very good at marketing. they've mastered how to do activism. They are good at creating activist groups that organized events they are good at creating contacts within media outlets to push narratives. They are good at infiltrating media outlets. but most of all they're good at marketing. and you can call the word whatever you want. pr…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:43 PM
67

every movement kind of goes that way. it started off Noble. women watching equal rights and the ability to vote. and they wanted to be treated as equals and be allowed to work and be paid the same as a man for the same job. That was also fair. but eventually they achieve that. and that's where the third wave of movements come in. once the movement gets to its third Wave it's usually already achieved its original goal of the quality. at that point really there's no more use for the movement. but …
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:38 PM
7

why is it that when anybody ever uses an accurate statement or a tactic that works there's always that nice a guy that comes in in like "hey! u shouldnt try to win! thats what THEY do!"
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:34 PM
4

why is it that when anybody ever uses an accurate statement or a tactic that works there's always that nice a guy that comes in in like "hey! u shouldnt try to win! thats what THEY do!"
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:28 PM
35

they want people dead its ok to hate feminists
/r/MensRights09/03/20 06:15 PM
5

that's just how the world works. you can have an opinion but it will get drowned out because there's more people than just u
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:27 PM
11

(its not) BanFeminism
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:05 PM
5

nope
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:03 PM
21

far left billionaires bought them..
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:03 PM
-1

or just regulate it the entire purpose of regulation is that the people vestt power in the government to be able to stepien if a corporation is doing something nefarious that has a negative impact on the people it all comes back to the people. and the people telling giant corporations that they cannot do certain bad things in their country. that's what a regulation is. and the people that advocate against regulations are generally people who do not want the American people to be able to step on …
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:54 PM
-1

it shows the other bigotry of the left against Christians and religious people. you can't be religious and also vote for Democrats. They hate you and they want to oppresss you
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:49 PM
3

can we talk about how Democrats promote blatant government propaganda? Obama owning parts of Netflix and Hillary doing a documentary? maybe Trump should release a documentary on Netflix?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:47 PM
4

its an inequality that either needs to be rectified or the structires meed to be changed to accommodate for itt as long as we have an inequality that men have to pay women for love (wich is ironic considering women demand to not be treated as objectss but then treat themselves as objects to be "sold"" to the highest bidder. note:not all women) but as long as thats the case we cant have equalityy.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:36 PM
21

You okay bud?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:30 PM
47

feminism is cancer egalitarianism is the right wa and that is compatible with mens rightss feminism is anti mmens rightss
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:54 PM
6

most feminism isnt ppro women. its anti men wich explains the hypocrisy
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:00 PM
-4

"the best way to win elections is to not vote!" -your argument. applied to other areas the problem with so many of these people. you guys can't understand how to actually win. you think that the best way to succeed is to run away. as if you are refusal to participate on Twitter is somehow going to turn everybody else against the Democratic narrative. do you really believe that? do you really believe REFUSING push back on a narrative is the best way to beat that narrative? definitely would make y…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter