TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EfficientAd1382 Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by EfficientAd1382 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Because those men would lose their livelihoods.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/08/25 08:59 AM

"women carry their own serious issues" Like contemplating monkey-branching.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 10:02 AM
1

Ah! Stupidity. "They are just stupid, bro" or "They are just sooooo craaaaaaazy, bro."
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:50 AM
1

She falsely did accuse them. That's more than enough.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:48 AM
2

They hated Shahzada Dawood for being rich enough to afford something like that.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 12:25 AM
16

The CEO did get killed in the process though. People hate CEOs for being CEOs (or rather rich people for being rich through corruption). In the submarine incident in 2023 everyone was hating on the businessman who got killed but offered sympathy for his kid.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 10:44 PM
1

"Forced marriage" and "sexual exploitation" of women aren't slavery issues when women are celebrated for selling their bodies. In more than most cases the woman is willing, to feed herself. By your logic, someone from first world taking up a job at Mcdonalds is a victim of slavery. Which isn't true. The first world person still leads a much better life and so do most female victims of these kinds of "slavery" than men are who are subjected to actual modern slavery.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 03:33 PM
1

Btw, do women equally focus on all types of leg exercises or just hyperfocus on ones that inflate their bunda? Sometimes, it just borders on gross how big they "train" their asses to become.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 02:56 PM
1

Wait! You're just sidestepping their innate hatred even though you kinda acknowledge it. I don't think we should show such mercy in our arguments. It implicates that if there was enough funding to go towards both causes women wouldn't spread their misandry. Yet why do you think some random, well-off and suburban white girl tweets about men not deserving their shelters?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 02:21 PM
2

Kids for women are aesthetics. Kids for men are a responsibility. Don't believe me? Look at crime statistics of single-mother households.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:14 PM
3

Beautifully put but it's just painful to read. Perhaps in another era, I'd be able to fully appreciate it, in which men's plights were socially and politically validated. Not really rage, rather lamentation. Rage just wastes energy and leaves me hollower. I think we should focus on deconstructing the gender dynamics by pushing the boundaries of social norms, the same thing women have done since forever. If we established an unapologetic narrative, like the way women have established men aren't e…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 04:51 PM
2

> It was generally a mix bag though, boys were overrepresented amongst both the top and the bottom, so the average grades were similar or in favor of girls, which I think is consistent with how the intelligence distribution works, but academic performance was not really associated with one's gender. Might be of interest to you It should be noted that this male advantage is consistently present despite efforts by test developers to construct tests on which males and females obtain the same IQs. T…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 04:27 PM
3

> If you don't want to bring God into all this, then one of the earliest examples of misandry in literature is Lysistrata by Aristophanes (411 BCE) It's a Greek play where women control sex to supposedly end war. Men are portrayed as sex obsessed, foolish and war hungry. While you could call it satire or comedy, it kind of flips power dynamics & mocks men’s self control and judgment - which, by the way continues to this day in the media. Holy! What a fucking soyjack. Men have always been blamed …
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:39 PM
2

I suggest taking every study on gender gap in education with a pinch of salt. Redshirting is something Richard Reeves latched on to by using these studies which would further set men back. It all comes down to the type of education system each gender thrives in. Women thrive in memorization-based education systems (it's also the lowest form of learning), but men in education systems that are exploratory in nature. That's how education used to be in the past. Your qualifications didn't hinge on m…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter