TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Efficient_Creme_3067 Archive

View 4 posts and 494 comments by Efficient_Creme_3067 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

You may not understand how often “unless you’re a woman” applies to military rules and regulations.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 10:11 PM
8

You seem angry. Why so angry?
/r/MensRights01/03/23 06:53 PM
19

Man, i am impressed with your dedication to your bit. You really stuck with it throughout two entire paragraphs, while not actually addressing any real issue. Well done.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:11 PM
19

Don’t get me started about how easy women have it in the military (physical standards test as proof), but the haircut is done for two reasons: Uniformity, and maintenance. You will not have time or the products needed to maintain longer hair. You’ll be lucky to get a shower everyday. Plus, the very first thing the military does, day one…is strip you of your individuality and make you “one of many”. Which they will then use to rebuild you into a member of a group, and teach you to be a team playe…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 01:50 PM
6

That’s a lot of words to simply say “It’s not me, it’s you”. I also find it hilarious when she wrote “women don’t need men, as they can financially support themselves”. The irony of this, is the vast majority of women get this “financial support” through things like government funds and sex work. Both mainly support my men’s money. Lol
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:58 PM
33

Hey. Have a heart, women make up an insane 25% of all suicides. That’s a large number… end sarcasm
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:57 PM
55

We can’t allow you to show men being victims, because of patriarchy. What’s worse, i bet the man being hit was also White. The fact that his face and head was hitting her hand, is White supremacy. The quicker you learn the rules for the internet in (insert current year), the less frustrated you will be.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:49 PM
69

“Among other things, police responded to Thaler's Farmington home 21 times in 10 months, she was arrested for stealing drugs from a health clinic and had to find a new drug-testing facility because of "bizarre behavior." WTF? How do you know this history and even consider letting the boy go back into that house? Jesus…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 08:59 PM
7

As a Southern man, i second this. Lmao. Also, it’s spelled “purdy”. 😜
/r/MensRights07/02/23 09:54 PM
14

If the truth offends you, you won’t like it here. In the words of the famous meme: “Well….bye….”
/r/MensRights07/02/23 09:52 PM
3

https://www.playstation.com/en-us/support/subscriptions/save-transfer-ps-plus-stream/
/r/MensRights30/01/23 02:59 AM
5

https://www.playstation.com/en-us/support/subscriptions/ps4-ps-plus-online-storage/
/r/MensRights30/01/23 02:58 AM
10

This. ALL my games saves back up to the cloud daily. The only reason i know this, is because (for whatever reason) one of my City Skylines saves won’t save to the cloud and it informs me everyday. But it also shows me all the saves that were successfully saved to the cloud.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 02:51 AM
2

You pretty much nailed it. I didn’t know it was such a cultural thing, that TV shows talked about it. But it was well known to American Navy people. The old story that was told to EVERY Navy person was, you wrote you name on a hat, threw it into the crowd that was at the dock to watch you pull in, and whoever found your hat, you went home with them. Now, of course that’s complete nonsense, and never actually happened. But the point was, Australian women saw American service members as something …
/r/MensRights29/01/23 03:03 PM
1

Who said anything like that? The entire conversation is about women who aren’t narcissistic and think EVERYTHING is about them, and caring little about men, versus women in non-western countries worshipping western men the way women use to. No one was saying anything about ownership.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 03:21 AM
8

As i said before, men don’t have to power to change anything these days, and we all know it. Which is exactly why men are checking out. With divorce laws and custody laws as they currently are, you’d be a fool to walk into all that willingly. In its currently state, the battle you’re talking about staying and fighting, you WILL lose. We have such a short time here on earth, why spend it fighting a losing battle, in a country that doesn’t want you? You can martyr yourself if you want, but you wou…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 07:24 PM
13

Men don’t have the power to change things in the West. So the only way to truly affect the west, is attrition. When birth rates hit the dirt and there are as many single women as single men in Japan, then the culture will shift back to where it needs to be. So there’s no need to live a miserable life waiting for that shift to happen.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 06:47 PM
22

It’s always been a thing (the number of military men doing it was always an insane number), but the rise of modern feminism has caused the movement to hit light speed. If you’ve ever been overseas to any non western country, women almost seem like slaves in comparison to western women. Even in countries like Romania, women absolutely ADORE western men. It’s a night and day difference. During my time in the military (back in the early 2000s), even Australian women saw American men as Gods. Not so…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 05:46 PM
33

passportbros
/r/MensRights28/01/23 04:19 PM
6

That is gut bustlingly funny if that actually true.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:45 PM
0

The excerpt i posted is FROM that article. It doesn’t dispute it, as you can clearly see. But answer my question. Are you saying that a circumcision does equal or more damage than things that happen in the years that follow?
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:41 PM
6

Are you really making the argument that something that happens to a baby in the first 3-4 days of its life, has equal or more of an impact on their life than things that happens to them in the years that follow? This is a perfect example of correlation without causation. Saying circumcision causes mass shootings, is even worse than the “video games cause actual violence”. Not only have MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of men been circumcised that went their entire lives without being violent, We know EXAC…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:48 PM
10

Man, now wold be the time to invest in cat related products. Gonna be an absolute fuck ton of childless women with cats.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:37 PM
17

I don’t believe this for a second. Hell, even i believe in “equality between the sexes”, but i absolutely despise Feminism. So i refuse to believe the two didn’t get mixed up, because equality and Feminism aren’t the same thing.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:00 PM
3

This seems like a bad take here man. These two things aren’t connected at all, and if at all, barely. Id even listen to an argument about circumcision being linked to the national drop in testosterone. But mass shootings? Nah, not buying it.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 07:09 PM
5

You are pulling an amazing “Frank Caliendo” with your Feminist impersonations. Spot on. Fucking amazing. Get this man a Golden Globe.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 03:13 PM
54

The most ironic and hilarious part of the body positivity movement? Even fat women say they won’t date fat men….wait for it…because they aren’t attractive. Lmao!
/r/MensRights12/01/23 05:55 PM
7

Many people have already laid it out nicely, but the bottom line of it is, when someone is use to getting special attention and special treatment, when they enter the work force, they are now treated like a man, their life IS suddenly harder. Suddenly they have to actual work and EARN their money, position and respect. They aren’t use to that. Where the statement of they working harder comes from, is they see men making it look “easy”, without realizing that’s only because men have been “playing…
/r/MensRights09/01/23 12:51 PM
6

I feel like this is some kind of social experiment, for someone doctorate thesis…..
/r/MensRights25/12/22 07:44 AM
8

Are you serious dude? We all know the power of an allegation. That’s already a thing. Just like the “hate speech” laws in the UK, all you need is an allegation to make the police come knock on your door to “investigate”. You just wait until a woman can simply ACCUSE you or cat calling or staring at her, to get the cops on you. You don’t actually have to even do it. She just needs to accuse you of it. If you give people a power that they can abuse, THEY WILL ABUSE IT.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:42 PM
13

Yet another law that will be enforced unevenly. Things about to get wild in the UK. Day dreaming will become a jail-able offense. Often, for whatever reason, my brain shuts down and i just stare in a random direction for a few seconds, until i can kick start my brain again with a good head shake. Doing that in the UK will get you time in the clink.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:29 PM
2

For clarification, i am both pro life and pro choice….in a way. I will quickly explain. I am more “anti-suffering” than pro life. As long as a fetus is aborted before it can’t feel the pain of what’s happening to it (usually around 20 weeks), then have at it…for any reason. After that, if the physical, mental, emotional and even financial health of the mother is in danger, then abortion done in the most painless way possible. HOWEVER, men’s physical, mental, emotional and financial health should…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:43 PM
8

Society: “I just don’t understand why men and boys are checking out of society and the dating scene…” 🤔
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:43 PM
116

Wait, so she takes a bunch of pictures with her tits hanging out, and she’s upset that people noticed? Make that make sense….
/r/MensRights27/11/22 02:40 AM
31

Interestingly, in the OPs write up, i noticed two things: She never once talked about how good their relationship was before this, and talked about how much she loves(d) him, and how this home wrecker was breaking her heart. But she instead, only talks about money, him supporting her, pays for her school, etc. It’s almost like, she ONLY cares about the money and the things he can provide for her. She even said she still has sex with him “so he doesn’t get tired of me”. Who talks like that? This …
/r/MensRights23/11/22 12:33 PM
-2

The truly important questions here are: What color is her hair? How long has she been single? What type of cats does she have?
/r/MensRights21/11/22 01:11 AM
2

The example she used to excuse the use of “mainsplaining” (which is a gendered term), the use of “Karen” doesn’t take into account that when a man is known as a “chad”. There is a male version of “Karen”, but no female version of “mansplaining”. She operating on a false premise. But the original joke was funny, and i did laugh.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 05:48 PM
1

Refer to the very first sentence of my post…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 08:27 PM
13

What follows is simply a personal observation, that’s all. When i was in the military, i served with a guy named Patrick. Dude was a certified bad ass. Spec ops guy, chiseled everything, physically. He fit the very stereotype that you see in your mind, of a Special Operations guy….until he opened his mouth to talk. You knew right then that he was not what you thought. There was no doubt he was gay, everyone knew it, but no one asked or cared because he was a fucking MONSTER at his job. He and i …
/r/MensRights01/11/22 06:53 PM
1

So, you’re claiming Musk is more afraid of Cancel Culture than Putin, who has now declared war on the Starlink system? https://www.republicworld.com/amp/world-news/russia-ukraine-crisis/russia-announces-space-war-on-elon-musks-starlink-satellites-accepts-moskva-was-attacked-articleshow.html Jesus, if you people think this is what a “friendship” is, I’d hate to see how y’all treat people IRL…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:12 PM
4

We shall see if that’s true. I am hopeful. He claims to hold Twitter to the “laws of the land”, and i hope he does just that. But we shall see.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:54 AM
19

Censorship isn’t a dirty word anymore, it’s the modus operandi for social media these days. “It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.” “It’s operating as intended.” Take your pick of whatever pun you want to use.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:48 AM
13

Dude, this isn’t the forum for it, but this is absolute nonsense. You do realize his Starlink system is what Ukraine is using to fight Russia, right? If he was pro Putin, why would he give Ukraine free use of Starlink?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:46 AM
6

Research has also found, never married women, make more on their life than never married men. Atleast as long ago as 2015. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/10/01/the-gender-pay-gap-is-the-result-of-being-a-parent-not-discrimination/?sh=19076f42ac7f
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:05 PM
8

Modern society : “Why are men checking out of dating and marriage?” Hmmm…i don’t know why…. end sarcasm
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:08 PM
3

You shouldn’t have to. Only a man should ever put his own name on a birth certificate. That’s not a woman’s place. When a woman can simply put whatever name she wants, on a legally binding document, that’s fraud.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 12:01 PM
10

The argument that i always find interesting, in many states, it is now illegal for a man to unbeknownst to the woman, take off a condom and ejaculate in her, causing a pregnancy. BUT there is not a single state where it’s illegal to trick a man into ejaculate inside a woman (lying about birth control), hold him physically to he is unable to pull out, “sperm Jack” his semen, or simply lie about a child being his. It’s not even illegal to write the name of a man on the birth certificate that she K…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:19 AM
1

Yeah, i didn’t even know it happened until well after it was over… https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/10/25/us/st-louis-school-shooting-tuesday/index.html
/r/MensRights26/10/22 07:45 PM
2

My suggestion is something that you may have noticed in living day to day life. On forums such as this, men tend to really let their feelings fly. Good and bad. But one thing you have to know….for the most part, men “suffer in silence”. Our lives are tough (who’s life isn’t, right?) but we have responsibilities that we take serious. So IRL, there is no time to stop and complain, or even tell people what we are going through. Further proof of this, is the latest school shooting. The shooter felt …
/r/MensRights26/10/22 11:19 AM
1

She-hulk reminded me of a funny moment between me and my buddies. One of my buddies got into a pretty bad motorcycle accident. He was fine for the most part. He sent the group chat a horrific picture of the road rash up one side of his body. Another buddy (jokingly) said “that’s nothing”, and sent a picture of a paper cut on his finger. That’s how She-Hulk comes off to me. Completely ignoring the pain and tragedy that is the life of the Hulk character, and telling him “Dad killed your mom in a f…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:07 AM
36

There is a single scene that set the entire tone of the show. When she tells Hulk she can handle her rage better than him, because “men question my knowledge about my job” and “men hit on me all the time”. Completely downplaying the absolute HORROR show that is the history and life of the Hulk character. That’s like telling the character main character from the show Dexter, you know what it’s like to have people you love be murdered. Even though Dexter watched his mom get murdered right infront …
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:01 AM
57

There are stories all over the US of men going to jail for not paying child support for kids that DNA proved aren’t theirs, simply because the mother put their name on the birth certificate. https://mtlawoffice.com/news/man-in-michigan-owes-child-support-for-child-who-isnt-his https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/detroit/court-finally-stops-trying-to-make-detroit-man-pay-child-support-for-child-that-isnt-his?_amp=true
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:02 PM
13

First off, I’m am truly sorry to hear about your battle. Women truly do not understand, that the emotional impact of keeping a man’s kids away from him, is EXACTLY the same as the emotional impact of rape on a woman. You feel lesser than, feel like you’re worthless, etc. But just know, it’s not true. Keep up the good fight. Just know (as we have no doubt ALL seen first hand) kids eventually get old enough to start asking questions and will eventually realize how the situation went, and that they…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 02:58 PM
160

Fatherhood is that anomaly where it’s mere existence is decided by entities outside the father himself. The mother, a judge, an evil “In-Law”, Child Protective Services, etc. can all decide you no longer deserve to be a father, and there is little you can do to stop them. Welcome to “equality” in 2022.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:51 AM
1

WATCH…THE FUCKING….VIDEO…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:48 PM
1

I’m just gonna assume you were cursed with an over abundance of logic and intellect. So I’m just gonna go talk to the adults and leave you at the kiddy table, talking to yourself, as you repeat the same thing over and over.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:48 PM
1

Again i ask….if women in combat is “perfectly fine”…..and aren’t so ineffective…that they are a danger to those around them……why isn’t there a single all women’s combat unit? Not even one?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:35 PM
1

I’ll speak slowly… Women….are less combat effective….than men….which makes it more dangerous…for men… More dangerous for men…..means we shouldn’t draft them….
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:32 PM
1

But they do. WTF!? Lol. Jesus Christ… Research/test done by the Marines and the Department of the Navy: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=URGhMw1u7MM That’s just one of the sources i have now posted THREE TIMES…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:25 PM
1

Since you can’t seem to find the information yourself… Women fail the Army physical requirements test WITH A 60% FAIL RATE. Meaning, less than half of all women in the Army can pass a basic physical fitness test… https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/05/17/more-female-soldiers-are-passing-acft-their-scores-still-trail-mens.html/amp In the Marines, when fail the basic jobs course, at a rate of 84%. Meaning, only 16% of female Marines pass basic tests… https://amp.thestate.com/news/local/milita…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:18 PM
1

No, my resource are about the effectiveness of women in combat, and the effect also have on men in combat. Not one of my sources says ANYTHING about the draft.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:11 PM
1

Clearly you didn’t look at ANY of the sources i posted. The research was done by the Marines and Department of the Navy themselves. This isn’t hard to understand. The findings are clear and irrefutable. If you disagree, feel free to take your cognitive dissonant ass away from me:
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:21 PM
1

The draft should remain, but be used ONLY as a defensive force, much as we use the National Guard now. As in, defending home turf. Because, frankly, if the war has reached the shores of the US, our military is dead, and civilians will have to fight for their own lives.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:20 AM
1

Even the two females that passed Army Ranger school, were found to have received special treatment in order to pass, including getting multiple chances to pass, which men do not get. https://people.com/celebrity/female-rangers-were-given-special-treatment-sources-say/
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:16 AM
1

Seems other studies prove the DoDs findings are wrong. Not to mention, accounts from people who actually fought in wars should actually hold more water than what actual 5 Star generals have to say…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:10 AM
1

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/marine-corps-study-women-in-combat-at-disadvantage-men-perform-significantly-better/
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:09 AM
1

https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-marines-women-20150912-story.html
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:09 AM
1

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=URGhMw1u7MM
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:09 AM
3

I agree, slightly. But i can assure you, that if they are drafting folks who aren’t veterans and reservists, we are all dead and normal citizens are the last line of defense.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 10:06 PM
11

Y’all are looking at this all wrong. The differences in expectations in government services (police, firefighters, military) is already bad enough as is. Women get into these services with literally half of the physical expectations as men, but are to be expected to perform the same duties, in which they are PROVEN to be unable to do. So when one person is unable to perform their required duties, that requires the others around them to pick up their slack. As a combat veteran, i can tell you tha…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:49 PM
1

I agree with everything you just said. I don’t think we should excuse bad behavior with a metaphorical (or literal) “that’s boys being boys”. But i also WIDLY disagree with the medias narrative that rape, sexual harassment and racism (white supremacy) is common. It’s absolutely not. Just as the unfortunate case you pointed out, of the hazing death, murder between members of the military are just as rare. If i read correctly, you husband has just joined the military, he will find out first hand, …
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:56 PM
1

I agree, not all women are like that officer. The majority ARE NOT. But it only takes that one, to ruin everything you have ever worked for. All men know that, so that’s why men act different around ALL women. These days, it doesn’t even have to be women that you have to watch out for. At my current job of 7 years, i was in a room with 3 other guys. During normal conversation, i called MYSELF a pussy, and was brought into HR the next day for my “derogatory and possibly sexist speech”. I am prett…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:35 PM
11

Let them try it. If dudes fall for it, they are idiots who deserve the pain. This type of thing is a level of delusional rarely seen even in a modern society. But hey, leave them to their insanity.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:06 AM
30

Women make up 51% of the US population, and make 75% of all consumer spending. You cant blame men for this or any failure. Women didn’t see it either, because they knew what trash it was gonna be.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:34 AM
5

Seems you aren’t alone. Even the guy recording the video clearly asks “is this a prank?” Lolololooollloooll.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:16 PM
1

https://pearsonslawyers.com.au/divorce-assets-split/
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:16 PM
1

Luckily for you, based on what I’ve read about Australian law, they don’t really follow the 50/50 split model, but it does say “laws tend to lean in the favor of the least financially stable”. Meaning, the laws would lean towards the one who makes less in the couple….that being you.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:13 PM
5

Nope. Lol. Everyone who watched it, looked at the person nearest to them and said “this crazy bitch…”.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:02 PM
25

Details have come out about this issue. Someone claiming to be an employee of that Walmart said they even watched security video, and claims this woman was in line, and went around the other people. When the guy asked her what she was doing, she flipped out and started ramming HIM (not his basket, but rammed his body) with her buggy. When people started asking her what was wrong with her, she even threw groceries at him. That’s when he started filming. SHE started the whole encounter, and she wa…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 11:04 AM
4

100%. Tho, i will make one change to your statement: Women in the front, STRAIGHT men in the back”.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 11:34 AM
8

Google had this same thought process. They ended up not only hiring more women than men, they “accidentally” ended paying the women more than the men. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/technology/google-gender-pay-gap.html This is what happens when you force “diversity”. It creates inequality.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 11:32 AM
2

https://pearsonslawyers.com.au/divorce-assets-split/
/r/MensRights28/09/22 11:18 AM
69

If you live in the US, no fault divorce laws state you are entitled to ALL assets gained during the marriage. These laws have seen women get 1/2 of military members retirement benefits. You are entitled to half of that $200k, and if she tries to hide it, or refuse to give it to you, the judge will throw her in jail for contempt. I’ve seen it happen personally.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:04 AM
3

We got tested regularly, even after the point we stopped. So up to a bit over a year after our last couple, we had no STDs. My gf becoming pregnant is why we left the lifestyle. For those who’s ears perked up, yes it’s mine. We both agreed to a paternity test when my daughter was born.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 06:18 PM
24

I refuse to believe that number. That, or my gf and i have gotten super lucky. We were swingers for 7 years and had close to 20 partner couples during that time and we never contracted anything. We did use condemns each and every time, but if it was that prevalent, people like us would know.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 02:28 PM
10

That is correct. A group truly oppressed but not by their own hand. But no one wants to talk about that… In short, i stand corrected…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:11 PM
9

This is a touchy subject, that much like talking to a feminist, is a pointless endeavor. There are many parallels between BLM and Feminism. Talking to people of those groups, as a person that is NOT a member of that group, will get you labeled one of the ‘ist words. They both tend to fail to realize that their lives ARE harder, but because THEY are doing it to themselves. But you can’t tell them that. Both groups run around screaming about the evil done against them, but fail to point out, take …
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:15 PM
10

I’d rather be honest, even at the risk of being disrespectful. The diatribes being spoken by BLM are the same ones spoken by Feminist. “We are the victims”, but fail to point out, that THEY are the one victimizing themselves. Much like i say to feminists, BLM needs to understand, when YOU care enough about your own people to help more than you hurt, I’ll will then be driven to help you. Until then, don’t expect me to care more than you.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:05 PM
0

Don’t care if you agree. It’s verifiably true. Google is your friend…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:08 AM
0

I can tell many people didn’t read past the first sentence. It is in a man nature to broker peace through violence. That’s our way, historically. This can’t be debated, as we have many wars to prove this true. Even if the “peace” that was being attainted, was subjugation, as with the Nazis for example. Women tend to broker “peace” through indirect methods, such as laws or directives. A bit of proof of this is the current climate on social media pertaining to “hate speech”. This is also seen on t…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 01:51 AM
9

Take my upvote and help me clean up the mess your truth bomb caused…. I just painted that house…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:46 PM
0

Because….reasons…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:45 PM
1

I think that is a VERY important distinction that she needs to make clear.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:44 PM
-8

I mean, the sentiment seems plausible. I once had a conversation with a psychologist that said “It’s in a man’s nature to make war and death. It is in a woman’s nature to make him see beauty and peace”. Still remember that to this day, and for the most part, i believe it. The issue comes when a woman’s nature to see beauty and peace, is aggressively pushed upon us. It’s the “against a man’s will” part that causes issues. We see this from women in power, who quickly develop a “my way or the highw…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:43 PM
2

You took my comment too literally. It was the point that Black women think, as did Pre-Civil War Southerners, that if a Black man dates or sleeps with a White woman, he deserves a beating or death. It had nothing to do with slavery. The majority of people understood exactly what i meant.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 08:11 PM
19

It’s ironic that Black women of today, have the same thoughts on Black men dating outside their race…as the pre-Civil War South.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 11:11 AM
30

Agreed.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:39 PM
97

This is the VERY reason I’m 41 years old and never been married. I have been with the same woman for 13 years, most governments want to strengthen “common law marriage” laws, which trap us anyway.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:55 PM
40

Sounds like a situation where the impact of the crime on the perpetrator is more important than the impact on the victim. In every other crime, if a criminal is found to have committed the crime, they serve that time in a mental health facility instead of prison. So society gets their justice, but the perpetrator gets the help they need. That’s doesn’t sound like what’s about to happen. Much like the woman who stabbed her boyfriend in a fit of rage, this woman is about to get off with almost no …
/r/MensRights04/09/22 01:38 PM
8

Yes, her statement sounded very “I’m not a racist, but…followed by a racist rant Or “I’m not sexist, but…followed by sexist rant
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/22 12:25 PM
4

Sometimes one parent can have more hate and bitterness for the other parent, than love for their own child. I’ve seen this first hand, as my sister was that parent. I talked to her often, and always told her the moment would come when the child was old enough and understood enough to ask her why she acted the way she did. I would always ask my sister “what will you tell them then? How will you explain that you hated him more than you loved them?” Much like your story, that’s exactly what happene…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:18 PM
6

Modern day feminist rebel against anything they feel is expected of them…even to their own demise. They reject anything that is seen as feminine, as they have it in their mind that Feminine = weak. When in reality, everything feminine is a source of female power. I once heard a woman say that it’s a man’s purpose to provide and protect, even if that means doing harm to himself or others. It’s a woman job to “fuck the war out of men”. To tame the beast that is men. The ability to calm a man, to b…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:11 AM
1

It’s a factual thing, with its own name in Psychology. Again, the Alpha thing may have been debunked amongst one animal, but other animals (including humans) still follow this mind set. THAT can’t be debunked. It’s science… https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/career-commitment/201404/alpha-woman-beta-woman?amp https://www.mensxp.com/amp/relationships/impress-women/47584-from-alpha-to-gamma-here-are-5-male-personality-types-that-decide-your-characteristic-traits.html https://www.wellandgood.c…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:22 AM
1

Not sure where you live, but in America, a petition is a legal request for (insert request) which goes before a judge, who can make a legal ruling. https://legalbeagle.com/7483109-petition-judge.html So you could easily petition a judge for parental custody, at which point a judge would order a paternity test to confirm parental linkage. It’s a very common thing in the US civil court.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:15 AM
1

That is only half correct. Every single human relationship has a dynamic, the leader and the follower. That’s what relationships are built on, professional relationships with bosses and subordinates. Even friendships have the same follower/leader build. When two leaders (Alpha personalities) come together, they tend to either clash, or magnify each other’s behavior.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:02 AM
1

I would assume that’s what the petition is for. To request custody and prove parental control.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 11:59 PM
1

I didn’t even consider this. Good point. I would assume the father would have to petition the court to try and get custody, even tho he is the father.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:16 PM
1

Wtf are you even talking about? It’s a PROVABLE concept. Lol. You post one resource that says “they don’t exist”, but i can post 3-4 sources that says they absolutely do. https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/the-science-of-alpha-males-in-animal-species https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/animals/2020/10/how-animals-choose-their-leaders-from-brute-force-to-democracy There’s even research on what happened when they removed the Alpha make from a group of Olive Baboons: https://pubmed.ncbi…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 07:12 PM
5

Women have some pretty damn good birth control options, it’s just the best ones tend to be invasive in either implementation or use. Men, however don’t have enough options. Condoms and pull out method are trash, and no man will willingly choose abstinence. So in that way, more/better options are needed.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:42 PM
2

I dunno the price. I’m just going by what I’ve heard. Also i will say, i also believe abortions should be like taking a poop. That’s something private that you shouldn’t go around telling folks, even if it doesn’t bother you or are kinda proud of it. A life is still getting terminated. So let’s have some decorum about it.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:39 PM
3

It’s the same for everything. Wanna use it as birth control? More power to you, as long as the 20 weeks thing isn’t breached. Although, i would argue (fiscally) $400 birth control a bit much. Same rules apply for rape and incest. 20 weeks. For perspective…that’s 5 months. 5! If you haven’t made up your mind by that point, someone clearly needs to make it for you.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:35 PM
1

That seems to be the norm now tho. So it’s not uncommon for people to believe as you do. For the record, i also agree with you.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:30 PM
1

If it’s even possible, I’m for both, just with time constraints. I’m am absolutely NOT the “life begins are conception”, and not “heart beat” level either. I’m ONLY concerned with suffering. For the mother or baby. A fetus can’t feel pain or even self aware until around 20 weeks. So aborting a fetus before that point, to me, is the equivalent of snapping a limb off of a tree. Yes it’s life, yes it’s alive, but if feels nothing and doesn’t even know it exists. But after 20 weeks…you’re locked in.…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:25 PM
2

I begrudgingly agree. It was needed to maintain the human population during the rough times of human evolution. Just make as many kids as possible and hope enough survive to carry on with humanity. But with modern technology, we are living twice as long (sometimes 3 times) and the old ways are no longer needed. Hell, we even have an over population issue. But with that said, it takes time for the male brain to fight off thousands of years of evolution to be ok with settling down with one woman. …
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:18 PM
5

Ah yes, another wall of text that is nothing more than you vomiting talking points and irrelevant material. You fail to even one time, in your two novel length posts, address the direct issue we are discussing. You’re just going with “women have it harder than men”. Which isn’t the argument we are having here, nor relevant to the current discussion. MEN HAVE ZERO REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS. Address that, not the feminist talking points you use to try and score pussy. Once men plant their seed in a woma…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:13 PM
31

This made me chuckle. Take my upvote and be merry.
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/22 02:29 PM
8

Your wall of text is nothing more than a bunch of blathering. Let me address the main point in this thread. Once an egg is inseminated by the sperm, a man gets to make ZERO decisions about that child. He doesn’t get to force the woman to have the baby, he can’t stop her if she wishes to abort HIS child. Most cases, he can’t even stop her from putting it up for adoption. He has no say if his child lives or dies. Even after the child is born, he has ZERO means to “choose not to parent”. Even if he…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:25 PM
11

I’ll give you a prime example: A man has ZERO legal say on if his child is born or not. That’s the most basic. There is also little a father can do to stop a child from being put up for adoption once it’s born. Women can choose “not to parent” in either abortion or adoption. Men have ZERO means to “choose not to parent”. Even if you give up parental rights, you still owe financial support for that child. https://www.justia.com/family/adoptions/contested-adoptions/ Even if you sign away your pare…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:18 PM
1

If you look historically, even as late as the 1900s, society was ABSOLUTELY a patriarchy. Everything from how marriages happened to child birth, to voting rights, the list goes on and on. HOWEVER, what society today loves to do, is take the past, and pretend it is still happening today. There have been MAJOR societal shifts in the last 100-200 years. One was slavery. We had to fight a war to make that go away. The Suffragettes (feminist) movement was the other. In both cases, those movements wer…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:35 PM
1

If you look historically, even as late as the 1900s, society was ABSOLUTELY a patriarchy. Everything from how marriages happened to child birth, to voting rights, the list goes on and on. HOWEVER, what society today loves to do, is take the past, and pretend it is still happening today. There have been MAJOR societal shifts in the last 100-200 years. One was slavery. We had to fight a war to make that go away. The Suffragettes (feminist) movement was the other. In both cases, those movements wer…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:35 PM
14

Considering men have ZERO reproductive rights, the over turning of Roe v Wade did nothing but give men and women equal birth rights. So, tell me again how having ZERO birthrights happens in a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:26 PM
3

But it’s 100% true. Monogamy is a social construction that humans only started practicing in the last 1000 years or so. Almost all species on earth have an “Alpha male” who reproduces with all the females. It’s where the term itself came from. But after humans began to “modernize” with tools, weapons and medicine, that biological imperative to reproduce with as many women as possible was no longer needed for the survival of the human race, monogamy became a thing. Which was a good enough system.…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:18 PM
1

It’s interesting that you barely touched on the one aspect that could derail that man’s findings. Before modern technology, men had to hurt wild and dangerous animals to feed their society. Something as simple as an infected cut could kill a human. Men then (like today) did the most dangerous jobs (war, hunting, building, etc) and died at a higher rate. Men were also killed instead of taken as slaves when conquered. In many primitive humans, we did just as animals did, and fought (literally) for…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 11:58 AM
5

It’s a biological imperative for men to impregnate as many women as possible. It’s how almost ALL animal species operates in nature. There are literally only a handful of animal species that practice monogamy. In the majority of species, a “pecking order” is established and the “Alpha male” wins mating rights with all the females. That’s literally where the phrase “Alpha male” came from. Humans are no different. The practice of monogamy is a (evolutionarily speaking) new thing: https://www.psych…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 11:44 AM
11

Unwelcome and unwanted are synonyms. This is possibly the stupidest and weakest argument I’ve been apart of in a long time. It’s illegal, immoral and wouldn’t be tolerated (nor expected to be) by any other group than men. Again, you’re not wrong that people can simply ignore such comments. But that doesn’t excuse or make them any less wrong. Period.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:43 AM
18

No, the keyword is UNWANTED. Even if you’re telling me a dirty joke out of nowhere can be considered harassment. It doesn’t matter what the comment or action is, it’s harassment. Making said comment or action sexual in nature (which a porn link is) makes the harassment sexual in nature. This isn’t hard to understand.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:14 AM
10

The legal and social standard isn’t that permission is assumed for anything. That requires previous participation. So unless they were already in a conversation that was sexual in nature, her posting a link to pornography is the text book legal definition of sexual harassment. As a coworker of mine once said “if it’s illegal to present it to a minor, it’s probably illegal to present to someone not actively asking for it” So considering she did the equivalent of sending him a link to a PornHub vi…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:11 AM
10

Fair enough, how about the legal definition of “Sexual Harassment”: “behavior characterized by the making of unwelcome and inappropriate sexual remarks or physical advances in a workplace or other professional or social situation.” Unless asked for, an OnlyFans link is elicitation of a sexual nature, it’s “unwelcome”. It’s EXACTLY like a dick pick. “Here, look at this. What do you think?”
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:59 AM
18

Incorrect. Attempting to sell a woman a “sexual toy” because you make them, won’t be an excuse when she presses charges for sexual harassment. “behavior characterized by the making of unwelcome and inappropriate sexual remarks or physical advances in a workplace or other professional or social situation.” The keyword is “unwelcome”. Unless i ask a woman for her OnlyFans information, it’s “unwelcome”.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:55 AM
19

You describe sexual assault. Sexual harassment is “inappropriate or unwanted comments of a sexual nature.” Or more exactly: “behavior characterized by the making of unwelcome and inappropriate sexual remarks or physical advances in a workplace or other professional or social situation.” So the OP is 100% correct.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:51 AM
2

I got banned from the “shitposting” sub because i was a “MRA Troll”. My comment that got me banned? “Shhh, don’t say that, or THEY will come for you. hears REEEEEEE in the distance Oh god, here they come.” That’s a copy and paste of the message i was banned for…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:13 PM
5

Not sure why y’all are down voting this man’s comment, he’s 100% correct. Wanna know why OnlyFans is a thing? Because you MF’ers are paying for it. Wanna know why womens behavior isn’t and will never change? Because you MF’ers are giving them attention. I liken this to video game companies like EA and Blizzard. They have RUINED the video game industry with predatory micro transactions. But they are doing it because they make huge profits, because your MF’ers are paying for it. When bad behavior …
/r/MensRights16/08/22 05:13 PM
1

Here is a story about a man in almost an exact same situation. Rape happened over 3 years (like the teacher above). He got 40 years in prison. Make perp, 40 years in federal prison. Female perp, 60 days in county jail. Where’s the equality? https://wpde.com/amp/news/local/nc-man-sentenced-to-three-decades-in-prison-for-raping-impregnating-child-12
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:09 PM
1

Here is a story about a man in almost an exact same situation. Rape happened over 3 years (like the teacher above). He got 40 years in prison. Male perp, 40 years in federal prison. Female perp, 60 days in county jail. Where’s the equality? https://wpde.com/amp/news/local/nc-man-sentenced-to-three-decades-in-prison-for-raping-impregnating-child-12
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:09 PM
3

Using logic? You’ll stop that right now or else you will be ejected from society. REEEEEEEEE /s
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:31 PM
2

It’s ironic and not a coincidence, that the women who call other women “pick me’s”, are the same women who are alone for the majority of their life. NO ONE picks them, and they are miserable. So consider it a badge of honor. Being a quality woman who cares for EVERYONE (including men) in their life, are the ones that live very fulfilling lives. Stay the course…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:28 PM
2

You’re not wrong. No doubt there have been situations where either a man didn’t deserve the violence done to him, or at the very least didn’t deserve the LEVEL of violence against him. You are correct. But, as you said, most of the time, we just move on with life. Atleast the more “mentally stable” amongst us anyway. Pride can be a hell of a killer in these situations. “He ain’t gonna make me look like a bitch” type thinking. But i think one reason men tend to let things go (that maybe we should…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:21 PM
4

This is a fact. Most men i know (right or wrong) won’t press charges if they get into a fight with someone. “We handled it” is usually the mantra. I once watched a buddy of mine bend down and tie his shoe, and another dude football kicked him square in the face. He soon realized the dude that did it, was the husband of a woman he slept with. His simple response was “i had it coming”. No report of the assault was ever made. These are obviously anecdotal examples, but i am CERTAIN these not situat…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:53 PM
1

That was the basis for this entire conversation. Welcome back to the conversation from 40 comments ago. If a woman could choose, be a stay at home mom with a partner being the financial provider, or being the provider and their partner being the stay at home person, THEY WOULD CHOOSE STAY AT HOME MOM ALMOST EVERY TIME. Which was the exact point i (and my stay at home mom, girlfriend) were trying to make. It’s “more” work, but it’s easier and more enjoyable work. It is absolutely NOT harder work.…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:48 PM
1

Jesus…TL:DR It IS that simple. Racism: The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others. Discrimination or prejudice based on race. The belief that each race has distinct and intrinsic attributes. If you are able to commit ANY of those 3 things, you can be racist. Which includes EVERY SINGLE HUMAN BEING ON EARTH. Even something like “White privilege” violate number 2 AND number 3. If you hate someone because of what you …
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:37 PM
1

They protected me FROM the discrimination those two people tried to put on me. One was fired for his discriminatory actions, in the act of a false discrimination claim. Again, you have this block on your brain that prevents you from realizing that individuals can discriminate against each other. Discrimination isn’t just something that comes from, or is committed by institutions (aka, businesses). The reason i allowed the company to squash the two situations, and didn’t make it a legal/civil iss…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:31 PM
1

Tell you what…simple question. Yes or no answer… Can Black people be racist against White people?
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:31 PM
1

The text books, and the law say i was discriminated against. YOU are the only side of this that doesn’t think so.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:29 PM
1

Again, you’re avoiding the same question and answer you’ve been avoiding this entire time. Chose one. Full time worker or full time stay at home mom. Which are you picking?
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:22 PM
1

That’s is not the definition of discrimination. I’m starting to think you’re not being obtuse and difficult, you’re just an idiot. Discrimination is ANY action, by ANYONE against a person based on protected characteristics such as race, sex, gender, orientation, age, etc. It doesn’t need to be an “institution of power” to be discrimination. Individuals are able to be discriminatory to other individuals. It’s where the hate crime standard lives. If someone violates your basic human rights based o…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:20 PM
1

Being rich isn’t a protected class. You’re being obtuse again, for literally no reason other than avoiding being wrong….
/r/MensRights08/08/22 01:59 PM
3

Sweet Jesus….you are just insufferable. You will pull every pointless and unrelated fact to avoid admitting the truth. I think we are done here….
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:32 AM
1

I was targeted because i was white and because I male. You seem to be proving the OPs point, by not seeing the problem with either situation.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:27 AM
1

I won’t argue simple definitions with you. It’s well know: Discrimination: the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex. I was targeted by those two coworkers because if my gender and race. Period….
/r/MensRights08/08/22 01:03 AM
0

I have no idea what happened to the woman, nor do i care. I can speculate, but chances are, I’d be wrong. But yes, the 3rd shift worker was fired, as he was within his first 90 days, as in “Right to work” state such as mine, you can be terminated for ANY reason. But in both cases, false accusations were made against me, simply because of my sex and race, with the intent of causing me possibly personal and ABSOLUTELY professional harm. That is the text book version of discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 12:51 AM
3

Agreed, we do not see them. I suspect there are two reasons for this, thought it’s just my opinion: Society seems to think pumping up men and boys as “bad” for society as a whole. People tend to have a literal physical reaction to puffing up a man or boys ego. It’s gross and what i think is leading to the increase of men and boys “checking out” of society as a whole. The other reason, is because we are use to NOT having such positive messages, we don’t need them as much. We have learned other wa…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:42 PM
0

I once was taken to HR where i work by a woman who said i was “aggressively staring at her like men do before they rape someone”. When in reality, i was staring at the tracker board above her to see what issue our new released software was having. When HR investigated, they threw the claim out. That same woman no longer works for my company. Also, about 10 years ago when i first moved to my current city, i got a job as an assistant manager of a gas station. My manager and i hired a guy for 3rd s…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:38 PM
1

On that we agree. Which is my exact complaint with many ideologies. You do you, and i will leave you alone. All i ask, is that you leave me alone when it comes to doing your thing. I don’t know how to prove to you I’m no longer Christian, nor do i care to try. But i will point out the two main issues i have with religion. The Bible says that God is jealous, egotistical, vengeful, judgmental and apathetic to the suffering of humanity, who he created. But those are also the traits that will get me…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:25 PM
1

I’ve never changed someone mind before. I don’t know what to do now, as I’m not use to this. So…a hand shake and a nod, as we awkwardly walk away from each other? 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:18 PM
1

You do realize that your exact comment was “as a group, straight, white males…” followed by a harmful and untrue generalization and insult. You just stereotyped 3 groups in one comment. So yeah…bigotry…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:59 PM
1

First off, I’m not Christian. Haven’t been since highschool. But i have no issue calling a spade a spade. Besides, when it comes to religion, everybody is a “homer”. Everybody thinks their guy is the best. Which, interestingly, is exactly what drove me away from organized religion. One group making fun of and damning another? No thanks…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:58 PM
2

The draft is one of a few hundred of issues where males are unfairly targeted.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:54 PM
0

There are more followers of Islam (3 billion) than any other religion. So they are the MAJORITY of the world.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:53 PM
5

Working part time? So they want a little of both worlds, eh? But that wasn’t the question i laid out. Ask them if they would want to be a stay at home mom FULL TIME, or work a 40-50 hours a week job FULL TIME. We, as men, don’t get to do “part time”.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:52 PM
1

Nice try, but of course we mean currently. What does things that happened 80 years ago have to do with today. So come down from your moral high ground and join the current conversation. You have avoided answering my question, so I’ll ask it again… Name me one other group that it’s not only ok, but encouraged to insult, belittle, degrade, And demonize publicly?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:49 PM
1

I mean, he’s right. Muslims are accepted in Christian countries, but Christians aren’t welcome in Muslim countries. If you try to go for the low hanging fruit of “Muslims are discriminated against in the US”, let me save you some breath. That is somewhat true, but in Muslim countries, Christians are MURDERED. So, it’s not the same….at all.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:44 PM
-1

Why are you so hung up on the Christian part? You do realize there was also other parts, namely “White”, “straight” and “male”. Care to chime in on those things too?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:42 PM
1

Oh they do, do they? Ok, name one group other than the afore mentioned that it’s perfectly ok to harass, belittle, demonize and over all hate with impunity….while in public or on tv?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:41 PM
2

You ok with demonizing hundreds of millions of people at the same time? There’s a couple of words to describe what you just did…. Discrimination and bigotry. You make a habit of such things? Oh, and you just proved the OPs point for him. Well played.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:39 PM
1

Admittedly, the delivery is hyperbolic, but the point is 100% valid. The Straight, White, Christian Male is the bogey man in every other groups back story. We are to blame for EVERYTHING These days.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:31 PM
2

Yes, i would still think so. The point of these types of messages, is to play to the positive emotions of the target group. It’s what’s called a “little white lie”, with the intent of raising the spirits of that group. But when you don’t inform that group that it’s a “little white lie”, and allow them to believe that it’s reality, is where things go off the rails.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 09:02 PM
9

I don’t give a damn if you agree with me or if you’re interested in my “personal stories”. Lmao. Like i said, quit the bullshit, and do your own leg work. Ask your own people. But you won’t, and we both know why….because it will prove me right. Even YOU know it’s true, but your pride and arrogance won’t let you be wrong. So, i guess that means we are done here. Cool. Later.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 08:58 PM
8

More work doesn’t mean harder. She has the ability to take as many breaks as she wants. She takes roughly 2 hours a day to play the video game of her choice. She doesn’t have to deal with the stress of a boss, coworkers, time expectations, meetings, etc. She does work on her own time, which is far more relaxed. So as i said, don’t just take my world for it…do you own social experiment and research with your own family and friends. See what they say. But I’m willing to bet, the women who have bee…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 07:41 PM
9

I would absolutely be able to work without her. Lol. You act like single dads aren’t a thing. See, it’s this false sense of importance. She makes my life “easier”, but I’m fully capable of taking care of things in life. Truth be told, she wouldn’t need me to function either. If i died tomorrow, she would pick up the mantle and do fine with everything. It’s infuriating when women has this false sense of importance. We don’t NEED you to function, just as most women don’t need men to function. But …
/r/MensRights07/08/22 06:11 PM
14

My gf (and mother of my children) is a stay at home mom. She was a working woman until our kids were born. Before that, we split all household chores. I can’t say it was 50/50, simply because we didn’t have “assigned” chores, we just did what needed to be done. I would do the dinner dishes a few nights in a row, then she would do them a few nights in a row. However, when she left work to be a stay at home mom, she technically did more work than i. She is on mom duty 24/7. But she will tell you, …
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:43 PM
13

Let’s not forget the man’s requirement to go assess and handle all dangerous situations.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:38 PM
82

Let’s not forget….”the future is female”. This type of stuff is meant to be light hearted and “cute”. If you ask me, it actually is. What ISNT cute, is women and girls not being told this fact, and are encouraged to actually believe this. It creates a false sense of power and superiority. Sayings like “The future is female” are meant to be empowering, not cries of superiority. People just don’t do the correcting when women and girls truly start believing the delusion. Also, women who scream abou…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:36 PM
-5

Agreed. I would suspect you’ve had these type of conversations with women and have found the same to be true. You don’t have to be a dynamo in the sack, you just have to actually give a shit about the woman’s pleasure. Unless she a total self absorbed bitch, or have a medical issue, most women will try to kill you with sex. Lol. DEATH BY SNU SNU!
/r/MensRights07/08/22 12:07 PM
-3

I think transactional sex is a VERY common thing in relationships these days. I have many guys friends who complain about it. But my gf and i, along with a couple of our married friends, run in the same swinger circles, so we are the exception to the rule. But i will say this, i do feel that part of the blame falls on us, fellas. For 2 reasons: Respect. From my experience, women love a “leader” in their life. In every aspect. You can call if being an “alpha”, or “being the boss”. Whatever you wa…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:29 AM
3

I’m 40 years old and have NEVER been married, but have been with my girlfriend for 13 years. I refer to her as my wife in certain situations. The simple reason i have never been married, can be told id you ask her about her last divorce. She was the one taken to the cleaners because the dude was a slob and even went to jail (contempt) for not following the divorce agreement. I will NEVER be married, ever, and she’s ok with that. My friends use to give me hell about being “that guy” that never ge…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 03:46 AM
1

I mean, ok? Good for her? Not sure how this relates to the topic at hand from the OP, or on my comment….but, ok. Cool.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:29 AM
10

I did two tours in Iraq…so yes. Lmao.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:16 AM
8

That’s such a bullshit example. Name me one feminist that’s gone to Saudi Arabia to try and change things. Lol. GTFOH. We all damn well know we are talking about WESTERN COUNTRIES, because that’s the only places Feminists give a fuck about. Not one of them are going to Middle Eastern countries to fight for womens rights. For two reasons….they know they’d getting killed. 2. THEY DONT GIVE A FUCK.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:36 AM
4

Saudi Arabia? Seriously? GTFOH. Lmao…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:10 AM
42

It’s staggering that the person that sent that comment, just doesn’t get the irony of such a statement. As long as a negative statement is made about men, it’s fine. But make that very same statement about ANY OTHER GROUP….REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
/r/MensRights04/08/22 03:20 AM
6

At one point in history feminism was ABSOLUTELY needed. When you learn the way women were perceived in the past, you couldn’t help but be disgusted. But, at a certain point, the goals of feminism were achieved. All rights were equal, mind sets of society where changing for the better. Suddenly, feminist who were apart of this necessary and noble group, had nothing left to fight for. So…they started nitpicking. Left unchecked, they started to see how much power they had over society (because who …
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:19 AM
23

This is true. MOST men tend to “know their place” and tend to not go to places they aren’t welcome or invited.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:48 PM
33

Nah, i have never seen straight men fetishize lesbians to the level straight women fetishize gay men. We accept lesbians and try to be friendly, but for the most part, we don’t desire and actively seek out a lesbian for my circle of friends. Tho, admittedly, my circle of friends has two lesbians in it. But the situation was created organically. Now, what men see as “lipstick lesbians”, i would agree with that statement. When dudes are young, they see them as a unicorn, craves them sexually. But …
/r/MensRights03/08/22 12:00 PM
6

Author Nora Vincent spent a couple of months as a man, and experienced being a man, first hand: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7kP_dd6LU
/r/MensRights02/08/22 09:04 PM
8

There are a few documented stories of Trans Men realizing what it means to “be a man” once they transition. They find that men are more accommodating and more sincere friendships, but face levels of discriminations they never expected or noticed. They essentially learned what you’re talking about, they women are seen as awesome “just because” and men are seen as demons…”just because”.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 08:57 PM
36

Anyone can support mens rights. Hell, everyone should. Mens rights are human rights.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 08:54 PM
1

That sounds like a reasonable and fair thought. I would even say that more true than we know or will admit. Hell, maybe we know this to be true, subconsciously. But either way, denying a spouse that love and validation, (in my opinion) is an abusive relationship. Unless an extreme situation prevents it, withholding something you KNOW your partner craves or desires, is pure abuse/torture. But that’s just my opinion.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:38 PM
2

Firstly, i find it ironic that you have an issue with insulting people that disagree with me, when your very last comment, you shamed men and then compared them to “infants”. Hypocrite much? Secondly, not understanding simple words within an opinion, will make it impossible for you to understand the stance the person is making. Prime example: THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN A RELATIONSHIP NEED PHYSICAL INTIMACY. That is the “rule”, the norm, a standard relationship, a simple human biological and …
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:23 PM
2

The “rule” means the norm, the average, the standard, the majority. You’re not very bright, are you?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:07 PM
1

You must be the OPs wife. Why you holding out on our boy?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:53 PM
3

Yes, your “lived experience” and anecdotal examples supersede clinical research. You bore me. Be gone.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:03 AM
3

Yet again, you’re not reading. One of those articles has 6 sources at the bottom. 3 of those sources are peer reviewed papers. But sure…you’re right…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:01 AM
2

Read the fucking research. Stop speaking from ignorance. If you bothered learning anything, there multiple reasons for cheating, but they ALL are based around the two reasons i listed. But psh, you ain’t about learning anything new…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:00 AM
3

I believe what i can prove. Period.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:58 AM
3

I’m not asking you to blindly follow anything. I don’t care is you agree or believe either. You’re allowed to be wrong while avoiding any evidence that proves you wrong. That’s on you too. Believe me when i say…i don’t care what you think. You’re clearly hell bent on disagreeing, trying to sound smart with nothing but assumptions to back it up, and have ZERO desire to learn anything. So we are wasting each other’s time. Later.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:56 AM
2

Fine, don’t believe me and my sources. Research it yourself.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:44 AM
2

I have already posted research as apart of this same thread, including 3 peer reviewed papers. Click around, I’m not posting it again…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:43 AM
2

Your “I’m sure” means nothing compared to human psychology and research. You can focus on exceptions all you want, research proves what the rule is….
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:37 AM
-4

Love her content, even if some of her guest are off the wall cringy. I’d bang her, if she wasn’t like 7 feet tall. Lol.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:56 AM
3

LOVE that dude. Voice is kinda whiney, but somehow entrancing.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:55 AM
2

You are ABSOLUTELY the exception to the rule. Lol
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:53 PM
22

If you check in the articles, or at the bottom, you will see their sited sources. Such as: Article: https://www.verywellmind.com/why-married-people-cheat-2300656 6 listed sources: http://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000012 https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america http://www.helenfisher.com/downloads/articles/INFIDELITY.pdf http://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15581660 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0079-1 You just have to know to look for resources within the artic…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:10 PM
28

You’re not wrong, but again, that’s the exception to the rule.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:04 PM
34

You’re talking about the exception, not the rule. https://www.verywellmind.com/why-should-you-have-sex-more-often-2300937#toc-frequently-asked-questions-44d0c01c-d24f-4438-a31b-50a79ef7d93d
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:49 PM
52

https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/relationships/a30459155/why-women-cheat/ https://www.verywellmind.com/why-married-people-cheat-2300656 https://www.healthline.com/health/why-people-cheat#desire https://www.marieclaire.com.au/why-do-men-cheat A quick google search will grant you a plethora of information and sources.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:09 PM
4

Neither of those things are “simple”. In fact, the research shows those are in fact, the two hardest things to control in the men that pay for attention from OnlyFans girls. The girls also know this. Every woman on this planet know EXACTLY what “feminine wiles” are and exactly how to use them. They are masters of manipulating men by the time they graduate high school. It’s a mental game and men have been losing since the dawn of man.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 03:36 PM
12

EVERYONE….E V E R Y O N E knows “diversity” means “less White Men”. But feel free to disagree if you like, that way i can call you a liar.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 12:09 PM
257

Sounds to me like you need new friends. There’s clearly an unaddressed mental issue going on, and the “butt hurt men” comment tells me it deep seeded. That’s drama and future trouble that you don’t want to get caught up in. Just my opinion tho.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 12:00 PM
289

A healthy sexual relationship within a marriage is VITAL. It’s an imperative if you want to be blunt about it. Naturally, for a short time after the birth of a child, women are not physically or mentally able to have sex. But this shouldn’t last more than a few months. Thousands of studies on why people cheat have made this point clear: Women cheat for love/attention they aren’t getting from their spouse. Men cheat for sexual gratification they aren’t getting at home. So in reality, withholding …
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:56 AM
26

Reposting this, as it was meant for the larger conversation: Men buying porn or OnlyFans content, is the equivalent (both mentally and chemically) the same as using drugs. There are studies that have been done that prove that many men pay for OnlyFans for the faux relationship that comes with it. Men are lonely and not getting any sexual attention from women…so they pay for it. Many admit that it’s not the “nudes” part that they truly are paying for. The momentary (and fake) attention they get f…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:21 AM
4

Men buying porn or OnlyFans content, is the equivalent (both mentally and chemically) the same as using drugs. There are studies that have been done that prove that many men pay for OnlyFans for the faux relationship that comes with it. Men are lonely and not getting any sexual attention from women…so they pay for it. Many admit that it’s not the “nudes” part that they truly are paying for. The momentary (and fake) attention they get from a girl they could never score otherwise, is a huge draw. …
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:18 AM
13

I mean, this sounds like a good idea, but ultimately, this is just another thing for women to lie about. “I told him to wear a condom, but he wouldn’t do it”.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:05 PM
5

Women do have many issues to deal with these days. HOWEVER, the vast majority are self inflicted. They seems to be driven to be “Independent women”. They think it will make their lives better, but eventually find out it makes them worse off. I’m not saying women should be slaves to men, or dependent on men. But the attitude that women adopt to be an “independent woman” makes them unbearable, even to other women. So it’s not the ACT of being an independent woman, it’s the ATTITUDE. Women truly do…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:12 PM
6

You do realize, that the “false accusations” stat are the ones actually taken to court. There are TONS of fake allegations that are just uttered amongst friends or social circles, and they are just as damaging. Wanna talk about things being “underreported”…..
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:33 PM
5

That fair enough. You seem to have a very good grasp on the situation already. Perhaps you can glean something useful from my suggestions. But as i said, the fact you even noticed his struggles says a lot about you and the type of heart you possess. I’m confident that you will find the best course of action for your buddy. Sometimes, simply showing that you care, is enough to make someone open up. Good luck to you both.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:10 PM
5

I am for what can be proven. A simple accusation is a sword. Simply forcing men to fall on it “just because” is demonic in intent, and damage done. I don’t believe anybody. As a wise man once said “trust but verify”. As my mother also taught me long ago “don’t believe anything you hear, and only half of what you see”.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:06 PM
12

Before i start, i am a combat veteran from the US military, and have dealt with many other veterans with these same types of issues, so my perspective may be a slight bit skewed from the normal thinking. But here’s what i have found to do to get people talking about their issues. Take him out for a beer. I don’t mean food at a restaurant, or a fancy bar. Tell him you wanna talk to him about something YOU are going through and that you trust his opinion. Obviously, since he has a spouse, clear th…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:58 AM
6

You clearly know nothing about the world of men and clearly have no desire to learn or admit any truths you come across. So that begs the question, why are you here?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:40 AM
5

What you are doing, not “believing” is exactly what men were doing to women, that birthed the MeToo movement. Just ignore, excuse, deny…dehumanize victims. Good job being what you claim to hate….
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:39 AM
10

Yet, women are rarely ever held accountable for their “weapon”. Hell, they are rarely even called out for it. Because of this, men have been relegated to living in fear of every woman he comes across. Even the work place has become a mine field for men. Men have even stopped mentoring women, because the possibility of it going south, just isn’t worth it. The very worst part, is people like you will literally use the phrase “eh, he’ll be fine” when a man is pull through hell by a false allegation…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:35 AM
5

Nice straw man. You got any thing else worth anyones time?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:28 AM
12

So you are going to dismiss the pain and suffering of a mother and her family, simply because you THINK it fake? That there is no world where this sort of things happens? Do you hate men and boy so much that you don’t believe we are capable of suffering this type of fate? Think this source is just “talking bullshit”. Fine, what about a form District Attorney? Is that a “reliable” enough source? https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/10/17/sexual-assault-allegations-wait-facts-former-prosecu…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:11 AM
14

So, you’re just gonna call the story in the article Bullshit, and give no credence to the pain and horror experienced by men, like the man in the “Mattress Girl” story? Or admit yourself that women use rape allegations as retribution for being spurned or angered? You really going to ignore example after example of men being targeted, simply to chastise mens notion of being a “victim”. Just know, it’s people like you that drive men to suicide or worse, mass killing. When a persons mind breaks fro…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:55 AM
11

You are correct. So i can’t argue against your point.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:54 PM
11

Admittedly, it hits hard and makes more of an impact, but legally, they are almost the same thing. So i wont disagree with you, as it’s basically semantics.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:47 PM
10

Lol. Yep. The insanity, right?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:09 PM
17

Yes, pedophiles sexually abuse kids. You are correct. What are we disagreeing on?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:08 PM
39

We are talking about sentencing disparities between men and women in rape cases. What does abortion have anything to do with this? Just jumping at a chance to push a narrative you approve of, eh?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:34 PM
119

Interestingly, in another story, a groom sexually assaults a drunk bridesmaid at his own wedding, and gets 2-4 years in jail. Have we achieved equality yet? https://www.yahoo.com/news/groom-sentenced-2-4-years-160553880.html
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:06 PM
1

Read the damn research. Jesus Christ….
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:38 AM
1

Don’t take my word on why women are less happy now than any point in history. Listen to peer reviewed research… https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:26 AM
1

Oh lord, there is that “mansplain” word. Lmao. Enjoy your cats…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:22 AM
2

Even female dating coaches agree. Not sure why you’re refusing to admit such. The shear number that the standards of 80% of women only match 20% of men. That’s why women are so unhappy, because the men they are looking for, simply don’t exist. Which is why there are more single women now, than since the end of WW2. There simply not enough men available that met their insane standards.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:30 AM
2

Do you realize, that in an attempt at a “gotcha” moment, you’ve completely missed the purpose, intent and importance of the stat you just listed. Have you ever heard of “Golden Penis syndrome”? Essentially, because women are so picky or standards so high, 20% of men are getting the majority of women. Because those men can get so many women, they have ZERO reason to commit to any woman. Then women start calling men dogs (and they are correct, because 80% of women are going to 20% of men because o…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:20 AM
7

You maybe talking about John McEnroe when he said that Serena Williams was the “best female tennis player in the world” but when asked if he meant “the best tennis player” he said no, that the women couldn’t beat men. That Serena would lose to any of the top 200 men tennis players. UK talk shows went ballistic, and he was fired from his tennis announcer job. But here’s the deal, we don’t “go low” simply because the enemy goes low. ALWAYS do the right thing, ALWAYS, because karma is real, it LOVE…
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:30 PM
3

I agree with everyone here. She realized she fucked up, and took some leave, in hopes the “situation” will have blown over by the time she comes back. Me personally, I’d give her a chance to apologize and make amends, as it seems the right thing to do. But if she says nothing to you, or acts like nothing happened, then run her up the flag pole, and pursue your grievance against her.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:56 AM
7

When you can have a sign like this approved for public viewing….you already have more power than white men.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 09:43 PM
20

OMG, there’s girls in here? Do their husbands know? Was that the type of “incel’ish” behavior those folks are looking for? I truly don’t know what a stereotype “incel” acts like. Hell, i might be one. Who knows.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 05:37 PM
3

Your qualifier “anyone with a brain” fails to explain about half the US population. Lol
/r/MensRights25/07/22 08:58 PM
31

Well, women assume men are born with one foot in Corporate jobs. That’s truly what they think. Like the Willie Wonka movie, we are given a “Golden Ticket” at birth, to be redeemed for a free job whenever we want. Truth is, men work their asses off to get into positions like CEO. Women truly believe, that when they come into some jobs, and realize how much work it truly is, they think they are “working twice as hard as men”, when in reality, they are simply now required to work as hard and as lon…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:14 PM
53

In the beginning, “equality” sounded like a good idea. If nothing else, maybe it would stop the whinning and crying by feminists. But about half way through the societal push towards “equality”, they changed that word to “equity”. Those are far different things, but i made an almost seem less transition. The problem is, equality means everyone gets a shot, and “may the best person win”. Equity means “there’s too many of (insert group) and we need more (insert group). Naturally this means men are…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 01:57 PM
9

The military tried this “sliding standard scale” based on gender. It worked like a charm. /s
/r/MensRights24/07/22 09:01 PM
0

When explained that way, you make a compelling case. But, good luck with that. You know “patriarchy” and all…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:24 PM
22

Me personally, i don’t think the issue is that we don’t have rights, because we do. It’s that rights are not handed out or handled correctly. Sure, there are many cases where our rights are completely ignored, or just not taken into account when laws are made. I believe it’s an issue that womens rights are simply cared about more, or are the only rights taken into account when decisions are made. Example: Men have parental rights. A single father gets to decide everything for his kids. What scho…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:16 PM
2

As a parent of both a boy and a girl, they are fundamentally different in some ways, and very similar in others. Although i will admit my parenting style is probably way different than most. I treat my son and daughter exactly the same. I rough house with both of them. To the point that at very young ages, i would “throw” them through the air, onto my bed. That was our play time. Although my son does indeed like to “fight” more than my daughter, even at 7 years old, she is fearless. She jumps of…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:38 AM
3

Went and read the comments, and i have to say… Faith in the future of humanity: -500 points
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:41 AM
2

Because i don’t let people come at me with dumb ass statements. I will call you on your bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:42 AM
1

I’m not debating shit. I told you, i don’t care. I’m just sick of people trying to make circumcised men feel “broken”. We are fucking fine.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:39 AM
-5

Then stop asking stupid ass questions like that. Circumcision is one of hundreds, if not thousands of mens issues. Da fuck? Lol
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:37 AM
-9

Because circumcision isn’t the only mens rights issue out there, idiot. What kind of fucking question is that?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:35 AM
-14

I love when people say that I’ve been “mutilated” because i was circumcised….. Disagreeing with those against circumcision is pointless, because they always make comparisons like female circumcision. It’s not the same and doesn’t have the same effects or fall out. One is done to REMOVE a female’s ability to orgasm easily, the other is done because of perceived medical benefits, regardless if they are legit or not. But the difference is, circumcised men are fully functional, and circumcised women…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:33 AM
15

Let’s remember, we want punishments to be fair and equal, not cruel. But i suspect you were just trolling. So here’s an up vote in hopes I’m right.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:48 PM
14

Well, that’s true most times, but they did take her into custody after the hearing. So atleast she’ll get “time served” when she gets her 30 days in jail sentence.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:47 PM
3

There is more to the story, that i didn’t fill in, that will answer that question. About a year before this whole mess set off, my sister called me and said she wanted to leave her abusive boyfriend. So i let her and my niece move in with my wife and i. It started off well, but a month after she and my niece moved in, she was refusing to get a job, so i threatened to kick her out. One weekend i was hanging at my neighbors house across the street and he asked me “what were those cops doing at you…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:51 PM
5

That’s exactly what she did. She is not mentally stable and made more of it than it was. But i don’t know if karma has returned the favor, as i have not spoken to her since the situation.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:55 PM
3

I don’t blame you. No one should tolerate hate for anyone. I don’t have time for people who will only bring hate and drama to my life.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:50 PM
1

See, now we are getting into distinctions even I’m not aware of. So…lol.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:37 PM
6

You know as well as i do, anyone/everyone suspected of anything with someone under the age of 18, is called that word by almost everyone , everywhere. They don’t make the distinction between a pedophile, hebaphile or a Ephebophilia. Most people have never heard those words, nor do they even care about the differences.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:33 PM
1

I’ll make it short for you… Read the room, no one agrees with you. Being ok with what this dude went through, means you don’t belong here. Go join the Feminist channels and simp to them. And the story about my buddy, you (like him) clearly don’t fucking get it….until it happens to you…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:16 PM
2

TL:DR Check the temp of the room, my dude. No one here agrees with you. We ALL know you’re full of shit. Has to go to the Supreme Court to clear his name of legal wrong doing and you’re excusing it. Why are you here? This is a channel for supporting men. When we say that, we don’t mean excusing bad decisions made by men. No one (including the OP) are defending his actions. Even the OP admits what he did was wrong. But what we are all pointing out, and what you’re too butt hurt from past traumas …
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:04 PM
2

Now, because overly emotional stuff still makes me uncomfortable, i must defuse this awesome bro moment with a crude joke, so please forgive me. Seems i still have some healing to do. Lol…. “So….does this mean we are gonna bang now?”
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:46 PM
2

Well said. People underestimate the power of a good “i feel…” statement. It can settle issues before they even become issues. But having the courage to start or even participate in “i feel…” conversations is tough. Sounds like you’re already there tho. Good job and good luck on your healing.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:33 PM
36

Thank you. But i don’t feel sorry for me, i feel sorry for my Niece. Because of a complete and total misunderstanding, she had to live in that girls home for another 2 years. She and i have spoken a few times since then (this happened back in 2014), and i asked her outright what exactly was in the diary, but she’s too embarrassed to tell me. But she insists it was not enough to raise that kind of stink over. Her mother fucked her up bad, and she was just looking for someone to love her, and sex …
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:21 PM
68

This is 100% correct. I experienced a situation like this, but wasn’t even actually accused of anything. Long story short, i had a troubled Niece who was out into a girls home at 16. I volunteered to take her in and legally adopt her. She lived with me and my wife for 4 months while we worked through the adoption process. Everything was going well, until her mother (my sister) shows up again, with a dairy my Niece kept while in the girls home. Seems she wrote in her diary that she started to dev…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 11:52 AM
11

How many times you been cheated on, bro? A dude had to go to the Supreme Court to clear his name. You ok with that? Ok with a dude being demolished by a broken legal system that requires that? “You deserved it”? Fucking unreal. Lol
/r/MensRights21/07/22 06:10 AM
8

You and i are not saying the same thing. You’re being an ass and showing ZERO sympathy for his situation, and you’re being wildly disrespectful calling him a “fuck boy”. The intent of you comment and mine are wildly different.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:53 AM
18

The two people throwing shade at this dude need to fuck off. First off, he didn’t MAKE her ruin her relationship, he simply gave her an opportunity to do so, and she took it. SHE is the one at fault here. I would say the same thing if the roles were reversed. It’s no different than offering someone a joint and then blaming the giver because the taker smoked it. It’s an asinine position. Secondly, it’s pretty clear through all of the legal findings, that he indeed was the VICTIM in this situation…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:58 AM
15

As someone who has had many therapy sessions (many being group sessions) due to a suicide attempt while in the military (military doesn’t play around with mental health issues) i can tell you one of the MAIN goals is to find your CORE issues. Most professionals like to call it your “dirty core”. So it is possible that he may have used your concerns about discrimination as an inroad to find out WHY you felt discriminated against, not determine IF you were discriminated against. The truth is, a “h…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:27 AM
2

If 80% of what she says is true, you can ABSOLUTELY say it’s based on truth. If something was 80% wet, would you call it dry? Absolutely not. But you have failed to prove she’s only right 80% of the time. So your point is complete conjecture. She may have a bias, but clearly you do too. So your opinion (and mine for that matter) can’t be objective. So both our opinions aren null and void. I guess people will have to watch her and decide for themselves. People deciding things for themselves….what…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:42 PM
1

Wanna link the video? Also, who said gender roles are a Conservative belief? There are women from both sides that are stay at home moms. Though i will admit, only one side is saying they are a bad thing. What isn’t a bad thing, is choice. If someone chooses to obey gender roles, are they wrong? But i would like to see the video where she said this, as to what exactly she said and the context behind her saying it.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:04 PM
4

With some of her quests, it’s VERY clear the women she invites have “drank the cool-aid” and no matter how many panelists say the same thing, they are stuck in the same mindset and thought processes and refuse to get it. When 3 dudes in the room tell you what dudes really want, as a women, you don’t say “i don’t think that’s right”. 3 dudes just told you it is. Lol
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:27 PM
1

But i will say this, i am open to examples of her showing Conservative bias, other than the fact she is Pro-Life. I’m willing to be educated on the matter.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:24 PM
2

I love her content. I will admit, some of her quests are VERY cringy and hard to watch at times. Lol
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:21 PM
4

Firstly, her being Conservative or not has nothing to do with the content she presents. She does have pro life leanings. But the vast majority of what she talks about is men and women when it comes to dating, legal rights, etc. I can also tell either you’ve only watch a couple of her short clips, and not watched a large sum of her content. Politics or her beliefs rarely make an appearance or a mention. Also, during most of her streams, she has a computer in her lap she uses to quote research and…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:19 PM
3

If you watch her content, it doesn’t seem either side has been very toxic toward her. She is very “no excuses allowed” and very “pro accountability” when it comes to both sides. But she does lean more towards men on mens rights issues.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:15 PM
50

Wait, you mean i was able to sue women for bad dates this entire time? I could have sued for false advertising and fraud by making me pay for dinner under false pretenses? Why wasn’t i told!?
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:47 PM
2

It was a troll, dude. For real. I was stating the most ridiculous things i could think of. You are taking all that waaaaaay to serious. Also, if you read further down the thread, i even admitted that i HATE the term “incel”, because it is always used in a derogatory manner. Which is why i REFUSE to use it, at all.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:29 PM
6

For real? Did you really miss the entirety of the intent of my comment? Are you trolling me right now?
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:13 PM
2

Reality legit doesn’t match up with anything you’re saying. Women don’t have it easy when it comes to friends? How about from women themselves: https://www.idiva.com/travel-living/womens-journal/are-women-better-at-making-friends-than-men/15134 Women aren’t able to find dates easier than men? Huh? Not only are men expected to approach women, women even refuse to approach men, because they are also afraid of rejection: https://www.elitedaily.com/women/why-girls-still-wont-approach-a-guy-first/898…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:56 PM
3

Ah! That’s changes the game. Sounds dumb, but if that’s the case, bring water for yourself, and just toast to the team, and just explain why you’re not drinking, without making them feel weird for drinking. Majority of dudes understand the struggle man. 100%.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:14 PM
3

We got you, bro. Stay up, brother.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:11 PM
1

That’s personal choice. Me personally, i would find it off putting if you offered me free beer, but didn’t drink the same beer you gave me. But I’m a notorious over thinker, so just use your best judgement. Just remember, the beer is a gift and peace offering.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:09 PM
2

Good man. Also, please remember, The most important rule when playing in a softball league (unless it’s a church league or illegal in your city), bringing beer for after the game will endure you to your team. A post victory beer is one hell of a bonding moment:
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:01 PM
11

One of her most recent videos is her doing street interviews with a sign that says “Feminists are a Hate Group”. Lol. The mental gymnastics of the people she talks to, is AMAZING.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:23 PM
16

Nah, this is the last study on the topic that I’m aware of. Which is one of the reasons i hate the word “incel”. I’m a 40 year old married man, so this doesn’t affect me. But the derogatory nature and intent behind the word “incel” is wildly degrading and doesn’t address a real issue in society. It simply makes mens struggle to receive physical affection (sex) even more painful to deal with.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:08 PM
24

Were you talking about the recent Star Wars movies? Luke (supposedly the most power Jedi to ever exist), took 3 entire movies to reach his potential. He went through a couple struggles with the Dark Side. The new Star Wars movies “Mary Sue’d” they shit out of Rey. She knew how to fly ships the instant she touched the controls, mastered a Light Saber within a movie and a half. She defeated Kylo (who literally trained his whole life and under a Jedi Master) in a Light Saber battle. Hell, Luke was …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:53 AM
13

Admittedly, i was “working the numbers a bit” trying to be funny. But the real number is 28%. https://brobible.com/culture/article/men-relationships-study-millennials/
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:36 AM
18

Something I’ve learned in my 40 years on this (flat?) Earth, For the most part, men need a reason to hang out and be social. Well, outside video games anyway. If you are looking for a good group of dudes to hang with, find a sport being played in your area. Doesn’t even need to be one of the main sports. I met many of my friends playing paintball. If you’re the nerdy type, find a game/card shop in your area and ask them what the game most folks are playing. Unlike women, men have to seek out fri…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:59 AM
186

What? Hasn’t someone told this person how easy it is to be a man? With the Patriarchy in charge, things are handed to us on a silver platter. Jobs are just given to us, we BARELY have to do any real work at all, and we get raises simply by asking for them. We are always listened to by those around us, and people NEVER ignore us when they see we are going through a struggle. I mean, it’s not like 60% of men below the age of 30 years old are virgins. So you know we get all the dates we want. Blah …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:20 AM
3

Seems the post has been removed. I’m sorry i missed this. I’d like to know the name of my enemy. 😁
/r/MensRights18/07/22 11:46 AM
1

I took a look in that channel, and i have to say, i had a few good laughs. Are we sure it’s not a troll channel meant to be comedy?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:22 PM
3

Yep, not surprising to hear a man just kind of say “eh, it’s fine” in situations like this. Us men know this is a battle we can’t and won’t win, so we just shrug it off. Which is rather telling when it comes to the types and amounts of abuse men can and do endure. Now let me be clear, one reason why we are able to endure such things, is because most men actually use insults to show affection. My friends and i are BRUTAL with each other when we hang out. But it always comes from a place of love. …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:02 AM
12

I think it because, for the most part, men have “thicker skin” than women. It is indeed gross and somewhat dehumanizing, but men tend to be capable of handling such mental abuse, and we tend to not raise a stink. Me personally, with everything else in my life that causes stress and that I’m responsible for, i don’t have the energy or time to “raise a stink”. So it is heartwarming to see women sticking up for men in situations such as this. You have my respect, and I’m willing to bet a year of pa…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:51 AM
1

I agree with everything you said. You are 100% correct. Which is exactly why “Hate Speech” rules/laws are a waste of time, IMHO. As you so elegantly put it, when you shut down entire avenues of speech, you also close off the avenues needed to discuss real issues. Although i do think Right Wing extremists hold some responsibility for the implementation of Hate Speech laws with their degrading narratives, and blatant verbal attacks against certain groups, ultimately it’s the whining and crying of …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:36 AM
14

Gender quotas are a real thing now. It’s a real world example of “Gender Diversity = Less men”.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:24 AM
-2

Yep. I don’t believe that LGBT people are siding with child abusers, i truly think that’s a Right Wing talking point and narrative. HOWEVER, they seem to be (as you said) making talking about and pointing out possible abusers due to their insistence they are being forced into those groups. Kind of like, they are accidentally hiding them within their own ranks.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:18 AM
4

Seems Reddit thinks it’s “Hate Speech”: https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/07/15/groomer-reddit-lgbtq-ban/
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:13 AM
4

I’m of the opinion, no matter what the original meaning of that term, it’s now a derogatory term, to the likes of the N word, bitch, cunt and the G word (the word used to describe those who cut a dogs hair). It’s meant and used to degrade those they are talking about.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:35 AM
1

The one he did in the UK, or does he have a new one?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:01 PM
0

I’m done with this convo. Y’all can have the last word if you want. It just blows me away you uncut fucks think you know what’s best for a boy than his parents. About a topic you didn’t go through, don’t currently have to deal with, nor will your kids have to deal with. Y’all have this “holier than tho” attitude like YOU know what’s best for everyone else. Whatever YOU think is wrong, fuck everyone else’s thoughts and feelings on it, you’re always right. Well forgive me if i side with then PAREN…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:13 AM
0

I’m done with this convo. Y’all can have the last word if you want. It just blows me away you uncut fucks think you know what’s best for a boy than his parents. About a topic you didn’t go through, don’t currently have to deal with, nor will your kids have to deal with. Y’all have this “holier than tho” attitude like YOU know what’s best for everyone else. Whatever YOU think is wrong, fuck everyone else’s thoughts and feelings on it, you’re always right. Well forgive me if i side with then PAREN…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:13 AM
0

I’m done with this convo. Y’all can have the last word if you want. It just blows me away you uncut fucks think you know what’s best for a boy than his parents. About a topic you didn’t go through, don’t currently have to deal with, nor will your kids have to deal with. Y’all have this “holier than tho” attitude like YOU know what’s best for everyone else. Whatever YOU think is wrong, fuck everyone else’s thoughts and feelings on it, you’re always right. Well forgive me if i side with then PAREN…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:13 AM
0

I’m done with this convo. Y’all can have the last word if you want. It just blows me away you uncut fucks think you know what’s best for a boy than his parents. About a topic you didn’t go through, don’t currently have to deal with, nor will your kids have to deal with. Y’all have this “holier than tho” attitude like YOU know what’s best for everyone else. Whatever YOU think is wrong, fuck everyone else’s thoughts and feelings on it, you’re always right. Well forgive me if i side with then PAREN…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:13 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:07 AM
0

EXACTLY MY POINT. They are allowed to make decisions on behalf of that child, based on what THEY think is best for the child, not based on what some morons on Reddit think.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:07 AM
-1

THE FORESKIN HAS NO LEGITIMATE PURPOSE IN EJACULATION NOR IN REPRODUCTION. Which is why, cut men are still fully capable of doing the same things uncut men can do.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:04 AM
1

Sounds like we are agreeing. What’s your argument?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:03 AM
-1

Will - “expressing desire, consent, or willingness”. A new born baby can do none of those things. That’s why the parents are tasked with making decision they deem the best for the child until it can LEGALLY AND MORALLY do so for itself.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:02 AM
1

I’m preaching parental rights. Not trying to dictate what others are allowed to do….
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:00 AM
-2

Fair enough….then how do they express that “will”?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:58 AM
-2

sigh
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:58 AM
-2

Primum non nocere. It’s the code of medical professionals. DO NO HARM. Do you really think the medical profession would allow a procedure to be done if it has no possible benefits. Doing so WOULD BE A FEDERAL CRIME.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:54 AM
-1

Bro, that “reasonable discussion” ship sailed with the bringing in of cutting off clits and raping little girls. Fucking hell man. 😂😂😂
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:51 AM
1

Imagine getting bent out of shape about something YOU didn’t go through, that doesn’t affect you, and probably won’t affect your kids. It’s virtue signaling at its best! Wow! Lmao…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:50 AM
1

YES! THE UNCIRCUMCISED DUDES! Lmao….😂😂😂😂. Cut dudes don’t give a fuck!
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:48 AM
-1

ITS ILLEGAL! That’s the deciding factor if something is wrong. Some people homosexuality is wrong. Should they get to tell everyone else what is “wrong”? Some people think being fat is “wrong” should they get a say in what is right or wrong? Absolutely insane in here…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:48 AM
-1

Answer the question….what body part is being cut off?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:45 AM
0

Be honest, your hate for circumcision has nothing to do what what’s “right” or “legal”, and is ALLLLLLLL about you feelings insecure about your situation. Be honest. Just tell the truth. Because circumcised dude DONT GIVE A FUCK, and YOU are arguing about something YOUVE never experienced yourself.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:45 AM
0

No, that’s exactly what you’re doing….with a joke. Boy, you uncircumcised boys are so insecure about your shit. Why do you fucking care? Lmao…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:42 AM
-2

Just because you think something is “wrong” doesn’t mean it should be “wrong” to everyone else. Who the fuck do you think you are to try and dictate the rest of the world? Lol May i go have a cigarette, master. I’d hate for me to do something YOU think is wrong. Lmao….
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:41 AM
1

Oh god, you again? You gonna make me quote the findings of that research you just posted?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:38 AM
-6

Just because YOU think it’s not correct, doesn’t means it’s wrong. Do you not understand that?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:37 AM
-1

Which has ZERO relevance to the conversation, because for the third fucking time, one is illegal and the other is a legal, medical procedure.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:37 AM
0

I will talk slowly for you… I make circumcision, only the SKIN is removed. No actual body part is removed. A male is still able to fully function and experience sexual please. That’s why it’s legal, BECAUSE IT AFFECTS NOTHING. Female circumcision, the entire clit is removed, and done so, so she can’t achieve orgasm. THAT is why it’s illegal. What the fuck even is this conversation!?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:36 AM
-3

Men who have been circumcised DONT GIVE A FUCK. It’s you uncut fuckers that seem to have an issue with it. And it’s an issue THAT DOESNT EVEN AFFECT YOU. So what the fuck are you complaining about?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:33 AM
-2

STAY ON TOPIC, you illiterate fuck. You’re making wild ass tangent arguments that make no sense to the original topic. First it’s raping little girls, then it’s cutting off little girls clits. What the fuck is wrong with you? Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:31 AM
0

But it’s NOT legal or moral in society to circumcise girls. Why did you switch the argument to girls anyway? No one was talking about girls this entire time. You wanna talk about a bad faith argument. Jesus fucking Christ….
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:29 AM
0

Fuck me….child rape is illegal, and immoral. Circumcision is legal and deemed medically moral. NOT THE FUCKING SAME. Jesus you people are dense as fuck. Define “alive”. Simple celled organism on Mars = Life. “Clump of cells” on Earth = Not life. For fuck sake, no one is talking about circumcision for girls. Who the fuck are you? Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:27 AM
-1

We have been over this…one is a crime and the other isn’t. Society and the laws agree with me. They are NOT the same. Your example and argument is invalid.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:24 AM
-2

Because I’m calling out the idiots who superimposing their own insecurities beliefs on others. That just because they say so, the parents are monsters and circumcised people are somehow “broken” or fucked up. It’s nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:23 AM
-6

So killing is ok, but a legal, medical procedure isn’t ok? The child doesn’t get a say in either case. How is it any different?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:13 AM
-1

So there is ZERO connection between forcibly raping a child and a parent making a medical decision for the child. You people are insane.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:12 AM
0

The rape of a child has NOTHING to do with parental choice. I keep making this same argument but no one knows how to respond. People seem to be ok with a parent deciding to abort the child or not, but if those same parents decide to circumcise the child, it’s fucking awful and terrible. How does that make sense?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:11 AM
-1

But is it tho? Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:09 AM
-6

Funny, i was gonna say the same thing to you. Except i didn’t bring child rape into my “nice deflection” speech. What’s wrong with you? Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:07 AM
-14

Are you really comparing circumcision to the raping of a 14 year old? Lol. Man, y’all will try any dirty trick to try and not lose. Again, Apples to Oranges. Let’s try to keep arguments relevant to the central discussion, and not go off on extreme, and unrelated arguments.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:03 AM
0

Still didn’t answer my question or address my point. What’s wrong?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:30 AM
0

No answer for that, huh? So tell me, at what stage of birth or age does a boy get to make decisions about his own existence. Also, the rape argument is a red herring. Rape makes up 1% of all abortions. Try again.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:27 AM
-3

You have strayed from the agreed argument. We are talking about a newborn baby, and about a procedure that doesn’t kill or maim them. So parents have every right to to choose an abortion but not a right to choose a circumcision? So at what stage of birth or age does a child get to make decisions about their existence? Asking for a friend..:
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:26 AM
0

The most shocking part, is there are people who are anti-circumcision, but pro-choice. You’re really saying you’re ok with your parents choosing if you live or die, but not if you’re circumcised or not. The math didn’t check out.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:22 AM
-1

You know what i have come to realize? MOST Circumcised men don’t give a damn either way. But what i have also found, is that uncircumcised men are so insecure about that fact, they choose to demonize “the other side” to make themselves feel less “abnormal”. Because if you aren’t circumcised, why else would you care? But the cheapest shot of all, is they justify their insecure hate for everyone who is circumcised, by using the oldest argument in the book “wont you think of the children?”
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:20 AM
0

That is true, because the majority have already been circumcised, so…what’s left to cut off?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:08 AM
-1

I control everything that happens to my dick. Short of fucking a “burner” one time, I’m happy with the decisions made about my dick. Even the ones i didn’t get to make.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:57 AM
-5

I can’t disprove that assertion, but can only state anecdotal evidence that i don’t have that issue. So….you win?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:50 AM
-7

Agree to disagree. We give parents the right to kill the kid if they want. How big a deal can it be to cut off some extra skin in comparison?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:48 AM
1

So here we are, both talking about shit we know nothing about. Got it. Which brings me back to my original point…You do you, quit shitting on people for something they can’t control.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:47 AM
2

FACTS!
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:35 AM
2

Fucking cheers!
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:25 AM
-3

So you admit it’s just the “extra” bit of the penis, and doesn’t actually penetrate the vagina cavity and plays no part of impregnating a woman? Well, yeah. That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time. Men are “fully operational” without it. What are we arguing about?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:25 AM
-1

“Yeah, so the research said that out of the 51 bits of research done, show no serious adverse affects. But did you read that one bad part?” You
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:23 AM
1

It was the FUCKING CONCLUSION. It was the fucking findings of the study. Are you high right now? Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:22 AM
2

Point is, I’m doing fine without my foreskin. So are 99% of men who are circumcised. We are doing just fine.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:21 AM
-1

The head of your dick has 4000 nerve endings in it. How many are in the foreskin around it?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:19 AM
0

Fine, ugh…from your own damn research article: “Conclusions Studies report few severe complications following circumcision. However, mild or moderate complications are seen, especially when circumcision is undertaken at older ages, by inexperienced providers or in non-sterile conditions. Pediatric circumcision will continue to be practiced for cultural, medical and as a long-term HIV/STI prevention strategy. Risk-reduction strategies including improved training of providers, and provision of app…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:18 AM
-4

Yes to the American assumption, and no it’s not central to sexual feeling. GTFOH, i cum during sex every single time. Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:13 AM
-5

So, we making exceptions the rule now? Listen, you can do whatever you think is best for your own child. Circumcise them, don’t circumcise them. Whatever is good for you. But I’m sick of people talking about it like people who are circumcised are gross, mutilated, monsters, simply because they don’t agree with the practice. You don’t see circumcised people talking about how gross that extra skin is. After 10 years in the military, and see thousands of dicks during that time, i assure you that un…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:09 AM
17

I’m a firm believer, that if you kill a child below the age of 12….instant death penalty. Do not pass go, do not collect $200….go directly to death row. Kids are helpless and love and trust their parents 100%. To abuse that love and trust my killing them, means you’re no longer human. Time to die, bitch…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:04 AM
-3

We already addressed that. There are a ton of things that happen to babies that they don’t have the ability to consent to. So what are we arguing about?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:00 AM
-11

That’s an apples to oranges comparison. For that example to be congruent, you’d have to cut the entire head off a boys dick. Again i ask, what vital or important or needed body parts is being cut off during a circumcision?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:58 AM
-5

Not sure why you care about what happened to my dick. You seem to think circumcised dicks are gross. Hell, i think all dicks are gross, even my own. Lazy fucker just sits there not doing shit, except mind fucking me into making stupid decisions. Hell, she should have had the doctors cut my dick off completely and made me a girl. My life would be a hell of a lot easier than it is now.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:51 AM
16

Quick, true story. My mother was progressive AF. Granted this was in the 1990s, so shit was different then. Not only was i not allowed to hit a girl, i wasn’t even allowed to say “bitch” to a buddy if a woman was around to hear it. Skip ahead to when i was 16. I was hanging outside out town video store, and this random chick (probably my same age), walks up smoking a cigarette. For no fucking reason, she puts it out on my face. I didn’t know her, didn’t say anything to her. As a reaction, i dril…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:48 AM
-16

Uncircumcised skin can hide STDs from sexual partners. So it’s protection others….using your logic of course.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:42 AM
0

Do you know what it’s like to not have foreskin? Wanna have a dick measuring contest?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:40 AM
0

If a baby has a “skin tag” somewhere on their body, is it “mutilating” them to cut it off? Besides, Mutilating: Disfigurement or injury by removal or destruction of a conspicuous or essential part of the body. What essential body part is being removed?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:40 AM
-11

But at that age, vaccinations are about YOU. Whooping cough, the flu, cholera, etc. You know, the shit that will kill a baby that’s less than a week old?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:37 AM
0

There’s that word again…mutilating. You do realize they don’t actually cut the entire dick off, right?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:36 AM
-64

You cant consent to many things are that point. Should we wait until we are 18 to get vaccinations against whooping cough, measles, etc?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:35 AM
7

This means we’re bros now. What’s your address, I’m coming to crash on your couch for “two weeks”. (Don’t seriously give out your address, I’m just kidding). 🤫😉😂
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:33 AM
1

What he said. You gotta be too stubborn to die. I ain’t letting the fucking losers in this world beat me. I’m gonna out live them all. I’m gonna be 110, and thinking of a feminist everytime i accidentally shit my pants from a cough.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:32 AM
0

Mutilated? I look perfectly normal. All the pipes and hoses work just fine. She simply “took a little off the top”. Every thing looks and works fine.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:28 AM
10

Why are you so angry? We are saying the same thing. Men passed it, but women weren’t fighting against it. Sesh. Calm down man. Go rub one out and have a beer. Me love you long time….
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:27 AM
37

Well yeah, of course. Did you really expect women to roger up for the worst experience a human can endure, and that’s the horrors of war? Psh. Majority of modern women can fathom having to kill a spider on their own, much less have to deal with human death all around them. The smell alone would send their world black…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:17 AM
2

Hell, i hope i live next door to a feminist for all 100 years, so i can let her see me love life every single day of that 100 years. Want me dead, bitch? Well guess what, I’m gonna out live you, hoe. Fuck you. Lololololololol. Oh, and I’d tell her I’m gonna piss on her fence every day after she dies.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:15 AM
4

A 70 year long, slow “fuck you, world” death? That’s what I’m going for. You should too. Just to show the world they can kiss your ass. I hope i live to be 100 just to get to tell the world “fuck you” 100 times.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:12 AM
91

Let’s be honest, WOMEN didn’t pass that legislation, men did. But you can damn well bet when the “shit hits the fan”, they wouldn’t fight against it. As Comedian Bill Burr once said “there are no feminist in a house fire.” Suddenly they become helpless and unable to save themselves and expect a man to come to their rescue.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:10 AM
-1

No no, i have the English language to back me up. Words have definitions that help us understand how they should be used. Saying “against its will” is not something actually happening, because as we agree previously, they have no will at that time. So you saying “against its will” is impossible and it’s simply you being hyperbolic and dramatic, in an attempt to demonize something YOU don’t like.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:06 AM
-8

Well…i got nothing for this. I’m just glad my mother cared enough about me to birth me. I’m also glad she chose to circumcise me. I’m also glad she chose to vaccinate me against shit that would kill me. You know, all that “loving parent” shit.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:04 AM
1

….and projecting your feelings and anger on a child that doesn’t feel the same way you do, is hyperbolic at best…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:01 AM
-7

Words have meaning, and intent. Use the proper words to portray your intent. Save the dramatic stuff for the women.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:00 AM
-6

It’s not semantics. You’re inferring “will” on a creature that simply doesn’t have it at that time in its life. You’re projecting your thoughts and feeling on a child less than a day old.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:58 AM
-94

Hell, by your logic, simply being born is against their will. They didn’t “ok” being birthed. They didn’t ok being pushed out of their mothers warm and cozy womb. Does that mean you’re for abortion? See , two can play the “make insane accusations” game….
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:57 AM
-14

Now where could you have possibly taken that away from what i said? I merely stated the fact that a baby less than a day old has no “will” or desires, short of getting warm and getting food. So nothing that happens to them (within reason) is against their will. By your logic, changing their cloths is “against their will” because they damn sure don’t like you doing it.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:55 AM
3

The first part, no. It’s 100% scientific fact. The lesbian part is a joke. You know, because butch lesbians dress like dudes.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:39 AM
-141

That’s not true. Most boys are circumcised when they are hours or days old. They have no “will” at that point. It is more correct that boys are circumcised against YOUR will, which is different and completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:35 AM
13

Some brutal truth right here….Damn. Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:33 AM
11

No, because they are not men. They are women, dressing as men. You know…Lesbians.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:33 AM
14

Not sure this will help you at all, but after an (obviously) failed suicide attempt while in the military, i found peace and happiness in a rather strange place. Being a humorous troll, to the point you either love me for my sense of irony and humor, or you hated me. Either way, i found it amusing. Allow me to explain: Like the part where you said people would expect manual labor from you. Like if a woman asked you to lift something for her. With a smile and a laugh say something smart ass’d lik…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 04:34 AM
0

sigh clearly this is something beyond your ability to understand. I don’t get paid enough to help you understand it. Frankly i don’t care if you agree. Federal laws agree with me. So think whatever you. I’m tired and need a beer…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:43 AM
1

Because that cost analysis of women becoming pregnant is ILLEGAL for one… The difference is between one being a historical, provable statistic. Your example are all based on what MIGHT happen, and individual performance.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:37 AM
0

Again, an irrelevant example. You’re grasping at straws to make your examples fit.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:34 AM
0

You’re not only over analyzing, you example is irrelevant to the topic. It’s simple cost/risk analysis, not some comparison of individual output at a job, aka, individual performance.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:30 AM
1

You’re not wrong. I can’t argue against your point. But i think as humans, we are all capable of hate/disrespect. The toxicity comes the moment you realize you’ve done it, either by accident or on purpose. Good women realize they have messed up and and either apologize or try to fix the harm. Toxic women truly think, feel and act with the “whatever, he’ll be fine”. Without even realizing it, they lose their ability to empathize with the pain of men. That is the issue with modern women. They see …
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:24 PM
4

That is also correct. I apologize for not mentioning that stat, as i intended to. The only reason i know these thing, is because i got into an “argument” with my sister in law about who are better drivers, men or women. So i went on a research binge for about a week.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:27 PM
23

This. I work in the healthcare field also. It is indeed a female dominated area, and the VAST majority of men i work with are super cool dudes, but you’d barely know, because they rarely talk, and i think we all know why…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:25 PM
7

This can easily be broken down to “cost analysis”. Although (in the US anyway) women tend to have more automobile accidents, men tend to cause more damage. Women tend to have fender benders, but men tend to have more significant crashes, most revolving around high speeds. This is no different than insurance companies charging more in certain cities/states where more car accidents occur. To be more blunt, this is the inverse of the WNBA pay situation. There, if you bring in more money, you get pa…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:46 AM
1

They are people. Humans that deserve the same rights and freedoms as everyone else. The one freedom they DONT have, is to set the reality for everyone around them. They are more than welcome to feel like whatever they want. It is not my place to tell them they are wrong. But what they will NOT do, is force me to participate in their reality. I see it the same as my lesbian friends who dress like dudes. They think they are “manly” They aren’t wrong for thinking about themselves like they. But the…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 10:04 PM
0

I like the caveat you put in there “accepting environment”. Which is a fancy way of escaping the 40% suicide rate amongst Trans people. Hate to break it to you, if you have an XX chromosome, you’re a woman, no matter what your mental illness tells you. But as this is a Mens Rights channel, this convo has no place here, as they are not men. So I’ll let it drop.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:50 PM
1

Isn’t that a “chicken or the egg” type dilemma? Did Body dysmorphia cause them to be Trans, or did them becoming Trans give them Body Dysmorphia? Or is it scientifically irrelevant what they “identify” as, as scientifically they have an XX chromosome?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:41 PM
11

If i may, i would say i not only wholeheartedly agree, but would even say the best women i know, inadvertently do it, without realizing it. My gf and i have been together for 12 years. This woman literally…legitimately knows me better than i know me. She knows when i am sliding into a depression, based on how often i play video games and how long i play them. But even she will make comments or do things from time to time that come from those stereotypes. Most times she will catch herself and lit…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:46 PM
0

Is now a bad time to say, “women with a mental illness can’t be men, no matter what they claim to be. That does make them Trans, but does not make them a man”? Or should i wait and come back later?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:38 PM
7

For the record, i attempted suicide while in the military and spent 2 weeks on a Psyche hold after leaving the hospital. So i know where you mind is. So understand that my “heartlessness” comes from understanding that “dark place”, and knowing how a man’s mind gets when he’s in that place. You don’t have to be there or stay there. You can come back to the normal world. It is possible.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:34 PM
6

Listen man, i know of atleast 2 people have been trying to help you see the error of your ways. You’re hellbent in believing your own lies. It’s clear that original commenter quickly discovered what i am now discovering, that some people are so deep into a delusion, there is no rescuing them until they want it. So i wish you the best in life and hope you find the joy and peace you are looking for.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:31 PM
2

Lol.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:25 PM
7

Man, i can see why that commenter hoped you were going to get the help you need, because you do. First off, this is not a burner account. The simple fact you would even think such a thing backs up everyone’s suspicions that you have an illness that needs addressing. Please take the commenters (and mine) advice and seek help. Secondly, as we say to feminist all the time “just because you THINK you’re being attack, isn’t proof you are actually being attacked”. Let me help you, you’re not. There is…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:24 PM
5

That’s because left handed people, much like birds, aren’t real. They are just hardcore trolls that like to make people think they are weirdos. You know, like those soulless Redheaded people. Edit: Decided to send this to my Redheaded, left handed, sister in law. I would be banned if i posted her response to me. Ah….gotta love family….
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:12 PM
6

I work with nurses and doctors everyday. The rules they follow are FEDERAL LAWS. There is no “corporate” anything in the care of patients. I am intimately aware of the laws and rules they have to follow. I am not a nurse myself, but i work beside them EVERY DAY. So you’re making not only a baseless assumption and accusation, you’re letting your anger speak for you, which isn’t healthy. Again, there is NOTHING in the screen grab you posted, that he alluded to any of your previous posts, or the wo…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:04 PM
11

So, a few things. I think the commenter in the screen grab was stating a fact, and YOU became hostile, dismissive and out right disrespectful. You made this convo something it should have never been. Your response to this person disagreeing with your “corporate shills” assertion, did come off as “unhinged” and was very “over the top”. I too would have assumed you had/have mental health issues. Outside of hardcore trolls, people don’t respond in this manner. So i believe he was simply responding …
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:53 PM
6

Which under the law in question. men can’t get without the woman’s permission. Women looking for a payday, will not give that permission.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:35 PM
11

Let’s pretend for a moment, that a car that is not you’re is illegally parked in front of your house. The police show up and ticket YOU for the illegally parked car, and give you no chance to prove it isn’t yours. You ok with that, and will just pay the ticket? Because that’s the exact situation you seem to be ok with putting men in.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:58 AM
7

We currently rent, only because we just moved to a new city for my work, and the housing market is absolutely INSANE right now. But we have also set our lives up in a manner that would allow us to easily separate if we decide to. We have separate bank accounts with a single joint account for bills. Our bills are a mix of her name and mine. Even our car registration is listed as “OR” instead of “AND”. Most people don’t know the major difference and importance of the two. If you list a car ownersh…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:07 PM
17

Same here. I’m 40 and never been married. The woman I’ve been with for 12 years (and have two kids with) has been divorced before. Her divorce story is the exact reason i NEVER want to be married and why she doesn’t either. We have been together for 12 years and she and i will die together. But marriage is DEAD. Not only is the divorce itself a soul draining experience and people tend to get VERY petty and immature, divorce laws DESTROY the men in a divorce. We are happy the way we are.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:59 PM
9

3 years in local jail and 5 years probation. She’ll be out for good behavior in less than a year. That’s what she will get. Write it down.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:30 PM
6

Two things first off. For the most part, women are “talker and feelers”, and don’t actually want anything to get fixed. It’s the “yaasss queen. You go girl” stuff. Plus, most of those channels are nothing more than echo chambers. Mix those two things together and you will get nothing done there. So truth or facts are not what they are looking for or care about. You are literally setting their world on fire with your truth and facts. I am by no means telling you to avoid adding your opinion and a…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:40 PM
9

The divorce rate in America is 50%. You willing to play those odds? As comedian Bill Burr once said “If you went skydiving and they told you 50% of all parachutes wouldn’t open, would you still go?”
/r/MensRights11/07/22 02:18 AM
10

We agree that people abuse the system. Which means the system needs to be overhauled. Instead of basing it on the available income from the non custodial parent, base it off a fixed amount needed for the child(ren), and set percentages based off that. Meaning, both parents pay into an account for the child, just mandate that one possibly pay more towards the account than another. That amount will no doubt increase as the child get older (sports, more expensive cloths for school, a car, etc). The…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:42 AM
17

Did you know, if you get a DUI, and lose your job, and are unable to get rehired in that same job field because of said DUI, you will still be required to pay CS as if you still had that job? The difference is, the courts don’t take ANYTHING into consideration, so people are left with little choice to work a lesser job or a cash only job. “You have a masters degree. You’re gonna pay this much CS, no matter where you work”. But the issue i point out, does my child need any more or less “support” …
/r/MensRights10/07/22 10:38 PM
61

Divorce law and family court laws have ruined marriage as a legal combining of two people. If you’re poor, you’re not fit to raise your own child and they give them to the mother. Make a decent living, and you still aren’t fit to raise your own kids, but now you get to pay for them and have your ex spend the money on everything BUT your child. Keep in mind, child support isn’t based on what you actually make, but based on how much a judge THINKS you are capable of making. If you happen to get lu…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:32 PM
2

Understood. But the 1 for 1 comparison is enough to make the point. Tubal ligations are paid for, vasectomies are not. That is unfair and a double standard.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:22 PM
9

Yeah, Australia is getting bad for these types of ads, even on TV. They make men out to be the “Jason from Friday the 13th) type people, just chasing women down ready to kill them. I follow two Aussie YouTubers closely, and they give the details. It’s getting wild out there boys….
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:56 AM
0

I meant the fact that the OP compared vasectomy to birth control pills. They are not the same.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:53 AM
-3

In the case of tubal ligation, yes. But the other forms of “birth control”, no. It’s not the same.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:55 PM
2

Yeah, seems they left out a few key details out of the article. Sounds more like retribution than escape.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:12 PM
3

Naturally, this is a detail they will leave out of the article. No need letting truth get in the way of the narrative….
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:12 PM
3

No offense intended, at all, but that is possibly the most naive question ever asked to me. I’ll explain with a few (admittedly) anecdotal stories from my days in the military. Before i tell this story, please understand i am not, have never been a Navy SEAL. But I worked WITH Navy SEALS, EOD and Riverine guys. I was not apart of their support staff, but i was apart of a small group of people that deployed WITH them, as something they “lovingly” called a “Ground pounding computer geek”. Want to …
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:04 PM
7

Yeah, that’s kind of not the same thing. Vasectomies are a surgical procedure that comes with other possible complications. That’s an Apples to Oranges comparison in my opinion. Now, if tubal ligation for women was covered but vasectomies for men wasn’t covered, then i would agree.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:41 PM
2

It’s normal to go through these phases. I’ve had a few in my 40 years of life. Hell, i had two of them during my career in the US Navy. One got me hospitalized. Was on top of the world, had friends all over, plenty of women. No reason for hating life at all. Unless a traumatic situation happens, depression can slowly roll in and you don’t even realize it until you’re neck deep in it. I had to get away too. I had a house i shared with my fiancé at the time. I requested to be moved on base to the …
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:01 AM
4

I’m not sure what the OP is saying here. Are you saying that a sex traffic victim doesn’t have a right to escape their captivity, if the only means to do so is killing their captor? I’m slightly confused on the OPs intent with posting this story.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:52 PM
3

Dear lord, due to you actually using words like “gynocentric”, and clearly don’t understand the psyche of men, I’m gonna go ahead and not believe you are truly a man. No man talks like that. Never met a single one, ever. Unless….your feminist friends have brain washed you that badly. Next you’re gonna use words like “toxic masculinity” and “patriarchy”. Heaven help us….
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:59 AM
42

What!? A woman getting off lightly in the justice system? Noooo. That’s never been a thing before…. /endsarcasm
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:17 AM
12

I’m going to guess one of two things to be true about you: You’re not a man You’ve never been in a men only space. Otherwise, you’d know the difference in mens behavior and comfort level when woman are around. Even if they don’t realize it, men tend to be more chivalrous (set on being a decent human being) and more protective, as is our nature as men. When it’s only men, we know everyone there can take care of themselves, so we feel zero need to be “on guard”. Plus, the chances of…..”misundersta…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:14 AM
10

THIS. X1000 In men only spaces, men tend to be more relaxed. We aren’t watching our words, and we tend to be more playful and boastful. We can be our usual “idiot” selves. If you’ve ever found yourself in male only spaces, you know exactly what i mean. The instant a woman walks in, men change, because we know we have to…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:10 AM
12

So, no reproductive rights for men? Got it. Just like with women, if i don’t want it, i should be allowed to remove myself from its existence…..just like women do.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 01:32 AM
12

Wow, you are a piece of work. Lol. Focusing on the exceptions and ignoring the majority, has your brain on fry. Enjoy your delusional thinking. Byeeeeeee. Lmao….
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:58 PM
10

You’ll be even more in disbelief when you find out that men and women ever grieve differently. Shocker, right? https://rednosegriefandloss.org.au/support/article/why-men-and-women-express-grief-differently https://www.cfhp.com.au/grieving-differences-men-women/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882469/
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:44 PM
16

Yep. As i said, you’ll ignore tons of peer reviewed research and facts and go with your own beliefs. Cognitive dissonance at its finest…..
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:41 PM
11

More for you. But clearly you won’t believe it… https://www.katielear.com/child-therapy-blog/2020/2/27/why-playing-with-both-boy-toys-and-girl-toys-is-good-for-kids “A study of infants showed that babies as young as 9 months old start to show a preference for gender-specific toys. This may mean that there are differences in biology between boys and girls that lead boys to be more interested in toys with wheels and moving parts, while girls prefer more fine-motor and nurturing play”
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:17 PM
25

So, i guess you just ignored all that peer reviewed research, didn’t you? There is research on kids as young as 18 months, that show baby girls are naturally drawn to baby dolls an bright colors. The science is painfully clear. Just because you disagree, doesn’t make it wrong. You clearly believe the whole “gender is a social construct” bullshit. Science proves that wrong: https://www.romper.com/p/do-little-girls-really-prefer-playing-with-dolls-new-study-claims-its-biological-29160
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:14 PM
24

https://www.webmd.com/parenting/features/how-boys-and-girls-learn-differently https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/how-boys-learning-styles-differ-0211134/amp/ https://kids.lovetoknow.com/child-education/why-boys-girls-learn-differently https://www.homeschool-your-boys.com/how-boys-learn/ https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-boys-and-girls-learn-differently_b_5339567/amp https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=csu1299084611&disposition=inline https://www.scientificamerican.c…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:05 PM
47

This seems valid. Research proves not only do men and boys learn differently (more active learning, not simply “sitting still” in a classroom), they also recover from trauma differently. Veteran treatment centers have different treatments for male and female military members experiencing PTSD. They have found that the majority of male military members “lock down” in a typical group setting. So it makes total sense that “standard care” for those asking for mental help, may not be as beneficial fo…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:13 PM
1

“It’s not misandry if the disdain is justified”. Ah yes. The excuse given by every true racist and homophobe ever. “If they didn’t (insert random actions) then i wouldn’t hate them so much”. Riiiiiiight…..
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:59 AM
2

It’s interesting how certain groups scream racism/bigotry/sexism/homophobia, etc, while changing the definition of those words to exclude themselves from being able to commit those same crimes. If you’re human, you’re capable of being all those things. Your group associations don’t make you immune from any of them. If a woman thinks she can’t be sexist towards men BECAUSE she’s a woman, and women can’t be sexist…is the text book definition of sexism. Most “‘isms” stem from one word….superiority.…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:53 AM
16

That’s some flawed logic there. By that same logic, ALL the justices aren’t White/Black/female/male, because normal people can not relate to the lives they live. In its face, your comment is racist, based on the fact its anchored on your assumption of what’s “Black”. That’s some hive mind thinking. That’s the issue with today’s Identity Politics, people are expected to think/talk/act based on their “group”. When they don’t, they are accused of not being “Black enough” or “Woman empowering”. That…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:07 PM
1

Too late. He’s 6. Lol
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:22 PM
2

See, there we go. THIS is valid information.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:07 PM
-1

Mine was a medical clinic. So….
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:07 AM
1

My resource was a medical clinic. So…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:06 AM
35

These types of paternity laws blow me away. You mean to tell me, i am legally required to support a child someone else has claimed is mine, but i am not legally allowed to CONFIRM i am the father? What kind of backwards BS is this?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:58 AM
54

I just laugh it off, because of how pathetic those types of women are. No need in getting upset of defensive. Just laugh at their silliness and move on. Hell, them seeing/hearing you laugh might piss them off, which is a double prize. I don’t concern myself with people who aren’t worth my time. Women who overreact to the mere sight of a man…aren’t worth you time or stress.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:08 AM
-2

You see the last 3 letters in that web link? .org? That means it’s an organization, possibly a non profit. The bias is built in. Go for resources that end in .edu or .gov. The .gov stuff are PURELY statistics and don’t bother telling you what the data “means”, they just give raw data. Edu links are educational centers who’s reputation requires peer reviewed data. Otherwise, they will lose credibility and won’t be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:28 AM
4

Nah, the difference is the maturity (age) of the women. My mom didn’t find her soul mate until she was 35. The key is patience, and not thinking the first woman who shows you affection is “the one”. Vet your partners, getting married before the 1 or even 2 year mark is pure madness. The best dating advice i have ever received was from a “playboy” who is happily married now: “When you first met someone, you don’t meet them, you meet their “representative”. The person they think you want them to b…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:25 AM
-2

Autism isn’t caused by infant trauma. Dear lord, this topic has gone off the rails, and has landed in Narnia. I want off this crazy train. This has turned into a bunch of nonsense.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:08 AM
5

The fact you saw first hand the destruction a man can endure, and acknowledging the need to be a good “partner”, tells me you are in no danger of your worst fear, becoming like her. I have been with my wife for 13 years and we have two kids. We argue at times, we disagree often, but we genuinely ENJOY time with each other. If you have that, you already have a great foundation to build on. One of the more common mistakes women make, is when kids arrive. As insane as it sounds, when kids arrive, D…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:00 AM
-8

Could you please cite a source that is not an obviously biased organization? Maybe something peer reviewed? That list is so asinine, it teeters on embarrassing. Fear mongering at its best. I need medical facts, not a list of obviously unrelated “symptoms”.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:52 AM
-11

Jesus, some of those complications i can see and understand. But Autism? PTSD? Distrust? Shame? Lung abscesses? It’s pretty clear this “list” is just listing ANYTHING circumcised people have experienced. Correlation without causation is an important aspect to remember when reading a list this long. I liken this to saying “serial killers watched TV growing up, so clearly watching TV causes people to be serial killers”.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:47 AM
-5

sigh
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:02 AM
-24

I mean, there are studies all over the place that show benefits of a circumcision as lower cancer rates, (in both the male and female partners) lower STD rates and even lower UTI infection rates. So…what is the difference? https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/16194-circumcision
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:00 AM
-33

As someone who is circumcised, with a son who was as well, I’m just not sure i see the concern with this. I am open to be educated, but the benefits seem to outweigh the downsides. I see it as no different than the pain of vaccinations. Yes it’s unfortunate pain, but the long term benefits make it worth it. Let me be clear before i open the flood gates to abuse, i am not saying either choice is good or bad. So save the vitriol, I’m not your enemy.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:48 AM
2

I have no energy of feel the need to argue IF a woman should have an abortion. Perhaps i give too much leeway for that decision. Perhaps i am more pro-choice than i realize. Both are possible. But again, since suffering is my concern, that is my focus. For instance, for the sake of the argument, let’s say a woman is raped. Since this is a wildly traumatic situation, it is completely possible for her to relive the rape every time she sees the child, or thinks about the day she gave them up for ad…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:34 AM
1

Although i can’t disagree that life is pain, the vast majority of pain we find ourselves dealing with, is self inflicted. So we have “earned” that pain through our decisions. A child has no hand in its creation, no say in its destruction, and no defense to prevent either. So even though you are not technically or morally wrong, the situations are different. As for animals, most people strive for a “quick death”, but such a discussion with a Southern man as myself, i feel will only lead to disagr…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:28 AM
1

Sweet. Don’t go anywhere. I’ll be right back. I swear. Don’t look at me that way. I’m coming back. I wouldn’t leave you hanging. What kind of guy do you think i am? Rude….
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:43 AM
1

Your “position” was that my opinion was ludicrous. I thought you went way overboard with your reasons why and i chose not to go out into the land of Narnia with you. So….agree to disagree then?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:37 AM
1

Not responding would be rude. Are we done here? My redneck buddies wanna do some drinking. You good to finish up here, by yourself?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:35 AM
1

Nah, sometimes when someone makes a play to prove how smart they are, i just let them have the win. I don’t have the energy for an intellectual battle over a topic I’m really not that invested in. I can say you’re right, if you want the win. I don’t mind.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:31 AM
1

I simply gave my opinion, you attacked my opinion and i defend my position. It’s not my place nor do i care if your mind is changed. That’s your job, not mine.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:29 AM
1

Wasn’t trying to. What would make you think i was? Lol
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:26 AM
1

Have you taken your meds today? If not, you should. If you have, take more.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:21 AM
2

Walk of text crits you for 249583658 damage. You die. In short, TL,DR
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:21 AM
6

Wow, i don’t think it would be possible to over think this point any further than you have. Any parent that loves their child enough to put their own life in danger, deserves praise. It’s not about who is more important. It’s about the sacrifice itself. It is no different than a parent jumping in the water to save their drowning child, knowing they aren’t able to swim either. It’s a heroic act. No one said not doing so i cowardly. Only YOU are saying that.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:12 AM
5

I would say someone sacrificing their life for the life of their child would qualify as a “hero”, don’t you?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:02 AM
2

Interesting that you didn’t use the medical definition of what a “surgery” is… “the branch of medical practice that treats injuries, diseases, and deformities by the physical removal, repair, or readjustment of organs and tissues, often involving cutting into the body.” There is no cutting of the flesh, opening of wounds, or any type of closing of cavities. This is why no recovery time is needed, because the bodies internal organs are not exposed to the open air, nor is a sterilized environment …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:28 AM
2

No, that’s the argument you made. My argument is simple. If a woman is planning on ending the life of her unborn child, she has a moral and legal obligation to do so in a manner (or time) that the baby is unaware and feels nothing. My argument is about that obligation, not excusing the killing itself. You seem to be stuck on the death of the child and unable to see past that. As if you think i am arguing that since it can feel nothing then it’s ok. That was not the point i made in any capacity. …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:22 AM
2

Also, the Snopes fact check has the study this was derived from. You should really learn to read more. https://archive.ph/2020.10.23-180330/https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:13 AM
1

It’s clear you know little about abortion. I suggest you go google the forms of abortion.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:11 AM
1

“You’re saying, no pain then ending a life is ok” No, i didnt. I said, that if you are going to end a life, do so when they can feel no pain. Much like when cancer patients are in hospice, they put them on pain killers. To allow the person to die as painless as possible. If you are unable to see the difference and nuisance between the two, i can’t help you. You are literally making a completely different argument than me. So….refer to #1.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:11 AM
2

Abortion is not a surgery. Some forms are outpatient procedures, and others are done by the “patient” from home. It’s literally quick and easy. There is no “surgery”. Would you consider 1 in 4 woman in America have got an abortion as proof of it being “common”? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/one-in-four-women-abortion/
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:06 AM
4

I’m not concerned if you agree or not. Don’t care either way. feel free to make an extreme and pointless argument/comparison. We see through the stupidity of it. So, please refer to number 1. yes, i also agree with assisted suicides. Anything that prevents or lessens suffering, I’m all for. I’m all for cancer patients being able to smoke weed during treatments. It helps them and lessens their suffering. my opinion also included mental and emotional suffering. Which would apply in rape and incest…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:11 PM
5

Don’t lose faith, men. I agree that MANY women have become self absorbed, narcissistic mental cases. But good women exist. I swear they do. I’ve been with the same woman for 12 years and have two beautiful children with her. But i didn’t meet her until i was 27. I went through many of those terrible harpies you’re talking about. Please don’t give up. The woman for you is coming.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:03 PM
130

My opinion centers around suffering. An unborn child develops pain receptors at 20 weeks. That means they can feel their own death and all the pain that comes with it. I’m ok with abortion for ANY reason before that point. For perspective, that is 5 months into your pregnancy. If you haven’t decided on what to do with the child in 5 months, you are now required to birth the child. Beyond that point, the ONLY reason an abortion should be allowed, is “life and health” of the mother. Even then, the…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:08 PM
6

The ultimate betrayal women are feeling, is one they did to themselves. When R v Wade was first implemented, abortion was supposed to be a “last resort”. Over the decades, it changes to a first (and many times only) option. “Safe, rare and legal”, became “on demand, up to and including birth”. You over played your hand, ladies. You have only yourselves to blame. You have now be regulated to play the same game as men, and that’s other people controlling your reproductive rights. Welcome to the ga…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:28 PM
9

Damn, that’s a truth bomb. I hope no innocent bystanders were hurt in an explosion that large. Jesus. Lol
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:11 PM
8

No. Because this ruling is based on the Constitution. Just because i disagree with the laws that states make, doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be allowed to make them. Want the laws on abortion to be different? Vote in your states elections, elect people to state office that will lower or eliminate abortion laws. The ONLY thing this SCOTUS decision has done, is make it OUR, the citizens of states, our responsibility to vote for state representatives that mirror our morals.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:03 PM
6

I will disagree with them, yes. You’ll be surprised to learn that I’m ok with abortions up until 20 weeks, which is about the time the fetus/child can feel pain. I’m not ok with the child/fetus feeling the pain of being killed. That is literally a torturous death. So, after 20 weeks, you’re locked in and have to see the pregnancy through. Even in cases of incest and rape. Life of the mother cases are a VERY special case. A mother should have the right to decide if they die or the baby dies. It’s…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:44 PM
12

1% and .5% is way beyond “uncommon”. Your inflating it’s value to the conversation and trying to demonize anyone who disagrees that it should be the deciding factor. Again, rape, incest and “life of the mother” were the selling points for the “safe, rare and legal” argument. There are obvious times that terminating a pregnancy is warranted. But as we just said, those obvious times that it’s warranted make up LESS THAN 2% of all abortions. So, if you wanna agree to allow abortions ONLY in cases o…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:10 PM
16

Nice try. You’re not playing that dirty trick. That’s what’s called a “fallacy”. The TRUTH is, 1% of all abortions are from rape, and .5% of all abortions are from incest. So try a different argument that isn’t complete bullshit. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/05/24/rape-and-incest-account-few-abortions-so-why-all-attention/1211175001/ As for those “pro life folks who think Plan B is abortion”, not only is that not scientifically correct (as Plan B PREVENTS the fertilization of …
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:58 PM
2

Jesus, wrong again. The 13 states that have even touched on drugs such as “Plan B” have clear legal standards in place. I’m not going over it again. Read previous posts for the facts.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:29 PM
3

You’re mixing words and definitions again and completely ignoring presented facts. Pregnancy has to be VERIFIED for “chemical or drug terminated pregnancy” becomes “illegal” or criminal. Plan B is only effective within 5 days of the “accident”. Even the most reliable pregnancy test won’t show a positive until after 5 weeks. The math doesn’t add up. Which is exactly why all 13 states with “trigger” laws, don’t address or affect Plan B, as a pregnancy has NOT be verified. It’s not a bigger assumpt…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:23 PM
11

MIGHT prohibit. MIGHT. As i said, you’re making assumptions. 12 out of 50 states have not outlawed Plan B. This is that “spouting nonsense” thing i was talking about. From 2 days ago… https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/a39945228/plan-b-ban/ While no states have officially banned Plan B or other morning-after pills yet, some lawmakers are thinking about putting stricter measures in place….. Some of this fear stems from the fact that 13 states have trigger bans that can easily go into effect n…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:12 PM
16

As for the 51% number, i can’t find ANY research on this topic except the one you posted. Seems odd, but i can find no data to dispute what the link shows. I will however point out, that the Guttermacher link got its data from 2014, where (roughly) 473,000 abortion were done for women who “claim” to have taken birth control that month, and it states that is “51% of abortions that year”. Yet, if you look up the abortion totals for 2014, the total abortions in the US was (about) 670,000. The numbe…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:53 PM
23

Bullshit. Gonna need your resources to this 50% number. There are government paid options that are 90% affective. If used properly used, ALL birth control is atleast 80% effective. Which again, is a CHOICE to take it properly. Also, Plan b is approved by the FDA, and is legal in every states except Georgia, Arizona and Louisiana. You are spouting absolute nonsense and total assumptions.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:19 PM
74

So my question is, a woman’s right to choose….what? What is she choosing? She chose to not be on one of the 13 forms of contraceptions. She chose to have unprotected sex. She chose not to buy the “plan B” pill. Women have all kinds of rights to choose. What they are demanding, is being able to kill an unborn child as a last resort “parachute” for making a ton of bad choices before that point. The issue i have with it, this “last resort” is hurting another living creature. That’s not ok.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:39 PM
5

You talk about “stat manipulation” and yet have done that very thing through your entire post. “Yes, men die more often from suicide, but women attempt more”. Like you can even compare the two. You do realize the vast difference between an “attempted” suicide and a “successful” suicide, right? Absolutely unreal… You claim that child custody is 50/50 if it goes to court. Well that sounds nice, but what you failed to point out (and your link is broken) is those are cases where BOTH parents AGREE t…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:59 AM
29

A quick search of Twitter hashtags like “Kill all men” and a search for things like “mensuck” on Tik Tok will debunk your statement. As a bit of a social experiment, search Twitter and TikTok for those same things, but replace “men” with the word “women”. The difference in the search results will tell you all you need to know….
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:19 AM
22

@jj24pie How about parental rights? Women get custody of children 80% of the time in the western world: https://bestforthechildren.com/what-percentage-of-men-win-child-custody-battles-2020-2021-data/ Or how men don’t have a say if their child is born or not. Or have a say if their child can be put up for adoption. Men don’t have the right to be believed when accused of something. It’s not “innocent until proven guilty”, not when men are accused. Women commit domestic violence more often than men…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:05 AM
5

When i was 9 years old, i was at my 3 cousins house that i stayed at regularly. I’m only slightly joking when it say i spent more time at their house than my own. My female cousin had a female friend over, who brought her 4 year old sister. The little girl was your typical playful child. She started playing peak-a-boo, so i played along. She was laughing and having a blast. She was running around saying “boo” to my male cousin and i, from random places in the living room. Suddenly, the older sis…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 10:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter