TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Efreshwater5 Archive

View 0 posts and 228 comments by Efreshwater5 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

You're just trying to tone police your own beliefs on others. You're literally no different from the people you're complaining about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 03:28 AM
–

Just read your TL and NO one should be listening to anything you call advice. Your brain is cooked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 03:26 AM
1

10 years on reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 12:21 AM
38

It's almost like enacting hard and fast rules or even laws about gender quotas ensures you will never know if people were hired because they were qualified....
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/20 03:19 PM
2

No problem. Have a great day.
/r/PussyPass18/11/20 06:41 PM
5

The person above used the term "knee jerk" to describe the poster above them's reaction... as though being outraged at a 35 year old raping someone more than half her age and under 18 isn't the appropriate response. But if you're asking what the colloquialism "knee jerk" means, it means a quick, initial, emotional outburst... often implied to be overly emotional.
/r/PussyPass18/11/20 06:04 PM
15

More than half her age and under 18. That's not "knee jerk," that's a correct response to a child rapist.
/r/PussyPass18/11/20 04:09 PM
1

It wasn't a slur. It was me genuinely asking you if you were on the spectrum. Now that I know you're not, I know you're either thoroughly disingenuous enough to be a waste of time or not very bright.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/20 01:04 AM
1

For the fourth and final time... do you or do you not understand that I am not comparing feminism to the KKK? Do you understand the point of the analogy was to glaringly highlight an organization or movement's stated goals vs its practical implication? You are being literal enough for me to believe that you must... and I mean this with zero disrespect... you must have a trace of autism.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 09:00 PM
1

No. I said analogizing (not directly comparing, as you seem not to grasp) calling feminism equality is like calling KKK grassroots doesn't make me sexist. You're literally taking an analogy and using it like it's a direct 1:1 comparison, while simultaneously calling me sexist for doing it. That's called either being disingenuous or stupid. You pick.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 08:14 PM
1

No. I compared calling feminism equality is the same as calling the KKK a grass roots community organization. You realize analogies are not, in fact, direct, 1:1 comparisons, right? Or are you one of those people that has trouble with symbolic language and thinks everything is literal?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:49 PM
0

It's cool. Don't sweat it. I'm a rando on the internet. Don't let it get you down.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:19 PM
1

No, I just don't care enough to go back and explain an interaction that you were 50% of. But it's all good... hope you have a good day!
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:17 PM
1

Take it slow. Words are hard. Go back, take a breath, and re-read and let me know when it hits you.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:15 PM
0

I know what you meant. You didn't achieve it.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:13 PM
0

An argument has points or counterpoints. A theory is a suggestion of why something happens. Mine: theory Yours: impotent rage at words you don't like. Nope. Not the same, but thanks for showing up.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:12 PM
1

"I get that I lied, so I'll lie some more about your comparison lol"
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:10 PM
2

The fact that you use "denial of pussy" like it's a transaction just goes to show how skewed your thinking is of sex and relationships. I'll stick to the sane people, thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:09 PM
0

Was this supposed to resemble an argument?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:07 PM
2

I'm sorry to hear that. Genuinely. And yes, that's exactly what I was getting at.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:06 PM
1

Well written and as the father of 3 girls and an egalitarian, I agree. Life is hard. Success will not come easy. And teaching ANY gender that you deserve people to follow your every word, take every utterance seriously, and respect you, unearned, just for being you is completely unrealistic and will only make the harsh reality of life harder to deal with the longer it takes for reality to set in.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:05 PM
1

All I hear is "I don't understand analogies."
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:02 PM
4

This is the important part that I think a few are missing. It's not just "oh, suddenly I'm getting attention from the opposite sex when I didn't before." That can happen just through consensual, age-appropriate "promiscuity." They're specifically in a position of power they use to manipulate their victims.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 03:33 PM
4

Comparing modern, 3rd wave feminism to the KKK doesn't make me sexist. Good try on slipping the ad hominem in though.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 03:31 PM
9

I agree. Which is why female rapists and make rapists alike choose victims they can have physical power over. For female rapists, they're not going to break into a 6'4", 250lb guy's house and attempt to rape them, so sadly, the target sometimes ends up being a child. But what I was getting at was the authority role aspect of it. That's why I think we're seeing more of these female teacher/male student rape cases.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 03:17 PM
8

Feminism is equality in the same way the KKK is a "grass-roots community organization."
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 03:14 PM
5

Disagree, but that's ok. I think the Disney narrative tells them their life Will be perfect. Feminism tells them they deserve and are entitled to be powerful, listened to, and followed, regardless if they've earned it. But that's just, like, my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 03:12 PM
4

Imagine thinking "Imagine..." is an argument or adds anything to the discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 02:59 PM
4

It's like I said elsewhere... both men and women who rape children should be lit on fire. No mercy for child rapists. But what I was attempting to get at, as you astutely put it, was the motivations why. Men and women murder for very different reasons. It stands to reason they would rape for different reasons as well. And as you say, I certainly can't prove it either way. Just observations from an armchair psychologist. Edit: have an award. It's all the coins I got, so you get the cheap one. Lol
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 02:57 PM
8

I don't think so. Men and women think differently and murder for very different reasons. It stands to reason they would rape for different reasons as well. Of course they're both fucked up and both deserve nothing less than being lit on fire for raping kids. But I think their motivations for why are different.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 02:53 PM
5

It's not about having superpowers. It's about being in positions of authority. And yes, feminism tells women that they should be in positions of power by the very fact that they have a vagina. So when they aren't handed power unreservedly, some of them seek it out predatorily. None of what I've said implies the same can't happen to men. Men just usually end up taking it out through anger... usually with domestic violence. That's where they seek the power they felt they are entitled to and didn't…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 02:50 PM
34

I agree that's a factor in some of these. Insecure women who were "ugly ducklings" in their youth. But that, more often, just leads to promiscuous behavior in their 20s. This is a power dynamic. These women are seeking out power they feel entitled to in the only area of their life they can access it... from children they hold an authority role over.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 02:23 PM
9

You're 100% right. As nature and her laws doesn't change, the more, especially women, are programmed that they too can be (and should be) Cleopatra, Xena, and Boudica, the more likely abhorrent outcomes are to be when that "reality" never arrives.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 02:20 PM
91

Unproven and possibly unprovable theory in 3... 2... 1... Modern society, especially western, feminist influenced society tells women they should be, are entitled to be, and deserve to be strongTM , powerful women... especially from their early years through college. When the reality of nature smacks them square in the face in their late 20s and early 30s, the ones who cannot deal with the reality of them not being Xena Warrior Princess seek out that power in predatory ways... like raping kids.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 01:58 PM
13

SaaaaaaaaLAP. You can hear his palm whistling through the wind right before the eagle lands.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/20 01:34 PM
4

Way top left nodding head in agreement.
/r/PussyPass27/06/20 10:01 AM
1

The cheeseburger is the real zenith of intellectual puppetry.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/20 03:52 PM
5

Yes. Would be retarded to think that there's no need to physically arrest someone for jogging solo simply because enough morons say "let's make these people more important than everyone else and get to decide things for us" and those people decide you're not allowed outside.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/20 11:21 AM
3

How the hell would you or anyone else know? And yes. I've seen more than a few beatings get people to realize they are assholes.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 03:25 PM
11

Look at all the assumptions you just made about a hypothetical situation to justify your statement. You have no idea what would happen and I hate to break it to you, sometimes violence does solve problems. Shooting someone that is raping you solves that one pretty quickly.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 03:18 PM
16

Yeah. Her and you.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 02:42 PM
45

One fought because she's a bully. The other fought to defend himself. They're not remotely in the same category, slapnuts.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 02:41 PM
10

A)second cop that just catches her limp ass, mid-stride is fantastic. B)blond girl at the end of vid suddenly rethinks all the "women are just as strong physically" stuff she's been told.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/20 09:44 AM
3

Obligatory, and lefts.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/20 09:42 AM
5

No... If she's old enough to know better and does it anyway, that's a bitch move.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/20 03:00 PM
8

She's old enough to know that if you hit somebody first, they have every right to hit you back.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/20 02:57 PM
27

Bluetooth Dongsleeve
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 07:06 AM
10

Money > principles
/r/MGTOW09/05/19 02:50 PM
1

You were ostracized for telling your friend about his wife's infidelity? If I wasn't clear, I apologize. Yes and no. Were some people mad at me and didn't talk to me? Sure. Do I consider any of them friends? No. Were others happy and grateful that someone let our buddy know what was going on behind his back? Absolutely. Do I consider those people friends? You bet your ass. If you got ostracized for telling someone the truth, those aren't the kind of people you want around you anyway brother. The…
/r/MGTOW25/03/19 05:03 AM
1

Everyone. Every single person cares To some degree, of course. But again, if you're being ostracized by people in your group for telling your buddy a potentially pertinent piece of info, you're in the wrong group anyway. Those people won't have your back in the long run. I have been through it and I can tell you that it's barely worth doing for yourself, and completely not worth doing for someone else. So have I and couldn't disagree more. Found out my buddy's wife was hitting the hay with a "fr…
/r/MGTOW25/03/19 04:23 AM
1

You're tacitly admitting here there's a good outcome, a bad outcome and some level of uncertainty involved. There's risk Of course. What I'm saying is the risk of losing a few people from your life that you really shouldn't have in it anyway is far less than the risk to your friend of getting too far gone to live a life of truth. If this woman is holding onto to old feelings, this guys friend will never measure up. I'd rather risk a shooting (ridiculously low odds) or ostracization (more realist…
/r/MGTOW25/03/19 01:37 AM
10

Although I'm not personally living MGTOW, I'm guessing it's like this... MGTOW is a result of the natural pushback created when a system is rigged against men (how MGTOWs view the modern institution of marriage/divorce/custody). MGTOW isn't about hating women, per se. It's about hating the structural oppression against men that they face when dealing with the dissolution of long term relationships, especially when talking about having kids in the mix. So rather than focusing time and energy on a…
/r/MGTOW25/03/19 01:17 AM
3

That's not dying though. If the people in your life would be mad at you for telling the truth, you need new people around you. You don't have to be a dick about it, but telling a mate you find it coincidental that his kid's name is the same as his girl's first flame isn't dying on a hill. It's being a good friend. Who gives a fuck what you look like to other people if you're doing the right thing. Not to mention, do you want to be the guy that had possibly pertinent information about your friend…
/r/MGTOW25/03/19 12:40 AM
1

Focus on improving yourself. Don't get tied to things that won't further that growth. Not disappear or remove yourself entirely from society or even the opposite sex. Just never sacrifice personal growth for something that comes at a price.
/r/MGTOW24/03/19 06:33 PM
6

Original thread said excel, if you can believe it.
/r/MGTOW24/03/19 05:58 PM
12

That's what she tells you and your dad.
/r/MGTOW24/03/19 05:47 PM
10

1)Women ascribe meaning to everything. So much so, that it's a meme. Ever see the meme with the girl and guy lying in bed and the girl is wondering what the guy is thinking and ascribing all kinds of meaning to what he's potentially thinking, but the guy is always wondering about something stupid? Yeah, women ascribe meaning to everything. 2)No one said malice. Meaning. And naming your firstborn son is not something you do lightly. So you have a meaningful circumstance combined with a woman that…
/r/MGTOW24/03/19 05:43 PM
4

If you're worried about how you look to other people, you're just encouraging the same cycles.
/r/MGTOW24/03/19 05:36 PM
32

It really does fuck you up for a good long while. From another guy in the club. Oddly, it often ends up down the road that you learn you don't have time for nonsense anymore. My new GF is as straight a shooter as you can get and I now am not thankful it happened, but I can at least say I grew from it. Hope all is well brother.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/19 02:23 PM
14

Congrats. You just proved you're insecure enough to correct a 10 year old's spelling.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:28 PM
2

If I had to guess, I'll bet everyone thought it was a baited question. It wasn't and I appreciate the answer.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:59 PM
1

Always my friend. Always. But that's probably why you and I aren't shouting are each other. Are we doing this wrong?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:59 PM
11

Yeah, like I said, genuine question. I've just personally never heard the term toxic attached to femininity before, but I'm not deep into the gender war world. I'm guessing that's just because most people that have a balanced view in the subject probably aren't the ones shouting about it.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:51 PM
1

Same with you and same to you!
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:33 PM
2

I agree. That's why I prefaced it with "genuine question". That person seemed to have a balanced view and didn't seem to be pushing a narrative, so wanted to see what their view on the flip side of the coin was. But i appreciate your input as well.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:31 PM
17

Genuine question, not begging it.. Would you say there are aspects of the current societal view of femininity that are toxic as well?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:13 PM
13

If you don't know about the last sentence, something tells me you've missed the point of the rest too.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:10 PM
27

This person, deep down, is a dark person. The more people project and scream about their morality and how superior they are, the darker their hidden thoughts.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:23 PM
7

That's actually refreshing to see. A balanced message that addresses the actual issue, instead of pitting one gender against the other. Edit: probably wouldn't hurt those of us that believe in that message to contact them and let them know we appreciate the way the message was worded to address the issue and not the current state of gender warfare.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:20 PM
1

Don't take this the wrong way. I don't mean any disrespect. Genuinely. But I'm actually making perfect sense, I just don't think you're following it. And I'll bet it's because you're skimming through it, instead of following closely and you're viewing it through your own predetermined outcome, instead of reading it for what it's worth and evaluating the validity after. Pre welfare/child support: Couple decides to split. Woman loses male income. No subsidies. Woman's new household income after sp…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:57 PM
1

I agree with your sentiment wholeheartedly. And the points that you make are not only valid, but spot on. But I do believe that the way forward for men's rights and true equality isn't to "attack feminism". Push the cases of hypocrisy and double standards to the forefront? Yes, absolutely. Counter harmful stereotypes and labeling? 100% But always... and I mean always... do it with a pro-men's rights, pro-equality message. Too many women have been indoctrinated and have sipped from the "poisoned …
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:42 PM
0

It's definitely an Anti-Duluth model sub/movement, for sure. But you say it's anti-feminism? I don't think this particular sub is anti anything, except things that are harmful to men. It's more pro men's rights. But more to the point, yes there are facets of modern, third wave, radical feminism that absolutely are harmful to men and this sub is 100% against that. But I think most guys and girls in here aren't against feminism, per se. Just against the new iteration of it and its double standards…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:20 PM
2

In what percentages of cases do you think the benefits of a mother splitting with the father amount to more than the money the father can bring in? That's exactly the point though. You don't need the benefits to be greater than what the father brought in. Matter of fact, you don't even need the benefits to be equal to what the father would have brought in. As long as the benefits subsidize the single mother to an acceptable level, she no longer has any desire to work on her relationship or herse…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:17 PM
1

No, whatever movement you subscribe to isn't this one. We are not at war with women. We may vehemently disagree with feminists and how their ideology hurts men, but we are not at war with anyone. We push for men's rights. Not "pwning feminists". There's other subs for that.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:02 PM
1

It's also your right not to be a fucking moron, but I can see you're not exercising that right.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:58 PM
3

That was definitely a factor. But most of the social programs that (if you believe them) were intended to help minority families have actually destroyed them through unintended (if you believe they were unintended) consequences.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:57 PM
2

Aren't you supposed to be in a Nazi sub?
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:54 PM
2

Whether it war intended or not, subsidizing women through punitive child support and welfare has allowed women to become the arbiters of when a relationship is over, as staying together no longer means more income for the family. Income subsidy is not available to all and does not affect both genders equally.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:53 PM
2

I don't think it's welfare as much as child support, though welfare plays into it...and it's not that fathers are paid to leave, it's mothers are paid if they choose not to make a relationship work. A relationship they chose and had a hand in starting. You remove the responsibility for the decisions women make by subsidizing them. But we're obviously painting with a broad brush, so let's take everything with a grain of salt. When there is no benefit to working hard to make a relationship work, c…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:48 PM
16

What are you even doing on this sub? This isn't a "counter feminism" movement, where men's rights means fuck women. This sub advocates for true equality between genders... not "putting bitches in their place". Take that shit elsewhere cause morons like you are what gives men's rights movements a bad name.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:26 PM
2

Sometimes, the vote fuzzing Reddit does can make the numbers look wonky for the first 10 minutes.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:23 PM
0

Oh God, just for a laugh I went back and read all the names you called me and insults you threw my way... the whole time you didn't even understand the fucking study YOU sourced!!! Oh Jesus, I hope this never gets old. I'll probably respond once a day for a while and enjoy this. And the sad thing is, I wouldn't have dug deep at all into your source of you weren't such an insufferable little prick about it. Oh Jesus what fun!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 08:43 PM
1

70% of NBA players donate 20% of their salary. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha It's incredible that you thought you were proving a point and calling me all kinds of names and you couldn't be MORE WRONG!!!! OMG! Greatest Reddit interaction ever! Jesus, there should be a sub for fucking assholes like you that call people names and then are fucking WRONG with their own quoted material. Fuck you made my day! Thanks prick!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 08:38 PM
0

Hahaha You're such a fucking asshole it's incredible. Let me help you read the chart, dipshit: 1)Athletes 2)Salaried athletes 3)Number of PURPORTED charitable foundations 4)Number of OFFICIAL, FILED foundations 5)Percentage of ratio of PURPORTED charities to salaried players 6)Percentage of ratio of actually FILED charities to salaried players 7)Percentage of PURPORTED charities to ACTUALLY FILED charities. Fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you Take your fucking shitty attitude and know t…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 08:30 PM
1

Not at all, pipsqueak. You're wrong. You've been wrong the whole time. AND you're a piece of shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 08:08 PM
0

Holy fuck are you incredibly stupid. Those numbers aren't the percentage of players that give what percent of their salary to charity, dipshit. It's what percentage of salaried players are purported to have a foundation, what percentage are on file as actually having one, and what percentage of the purported charities are actually on file. Jesus fuck, you fucking twit. Go fuck yourself with your shitty fucking attitude, especially when you're fucking wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 08:03 PM
0

I did, fuck face
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 07:35 PM
0

Did you read your study or just shoot off your mouth like a dumbass? The study was of athletes who started a charity. The commenter said athletes in general do more than 99.99% of the general population. Way to cite a survey of only the athletes who started their own charity to prove your point. Dipshit. Oh yeah, "this is where you walk away like a dumbass".
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 07:31 PM
-2

Using the word "ramblings" doesn't validate your point nor invalidate mine. Ready? Watch me not care.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 04:08 PM
0

Not "looks up to". Is her hero. Admire their work ethic. Strive for their competitiveness. That's great. But to make athletes your hero at the age of 20, she is going to be/deserves to be disappointed if/when she meets her.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 04:07 PM
-6

That's great. Good example. But the point stands that if you make an athlete your hero because they're an athlete, you're going to be/deserve to be disappointed if/when you meet them.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 04:04 PM
1

Great. Idolize those ones. Making an athlete your hero because they're an athlete is idiotic.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:59 PM
-2

I'm sorry... I'm supposed to care?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:58 PM
2

Yeah, takes a genius to figure out you shouldn't make athletes your hero.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:57 PM
1

Got eem
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:55 PM
1

Ok, then let me ask you a reasonable question since you're one of the few reasonable responses... Would you call any athlete your hero? Specifically that word. Not admire, not even idolize. Would you call any of them your hero?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:54 PM
0

Don't tell Reddit that.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:53 PM
-14

And I'm allowed to call the rest morons for not.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:52 PM
0

Hey fuck face, go pound salt. Most professional athletes do more for their community than 99.9% of people. Care to back that up champ or are we just slinging bullshit for the hell of it today? Your little story is also bullshit. Nice try though. Got eem. Made it all up.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:52 PM
0

How is saying anyone who calls an athlete a hero deserves to be disappointed hating on a female tennis player? Ffs, I didn't specify which sport, which gender, nor specifically which tennis player. Athletes. Period. If you call athletes your hero, you're going to be and deserve to be disappointed if/when you meet them. Like the insult at the end too. Adds a nice touch.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:50 PM
2

Pathetic. You think me saying anyone who idolizes athletes deserves to be disappointed, but you call a man with that track record in his community just "a dad who gives to charity". Absolutely pathetic.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:48 PM
1

role models Totally different than hero. But it’s better than nothing Is it? Except in Serena’s most athlete's cases. Nothing would be better.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:46 PM
1

Another ad hominem. Glad to see Reddit hasn't changed.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:45 PM
-2

Then admire their work ethic. But to call them a hero? It's your life. All I said was you're going to and deserve to be disappointed if/when you meet them.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:44 PM
2

Standard hive mind. Touch a nerve and the sheep can't handle it. It's pretty simple... if you idolize athletes, you're going to be disappointed if/when you meet them. Never said people should idolize anyone, let alone who people should idolize. But that makes me a neckbeard and sad and bitter. Meanwhile...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:42 PM
0

Bored at work, awaiting a delivery.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:39 PM
0

Who said anything about superior? I said people who idolize athletes deserve to be disappointed if/when they meet them. Never said people should idolize anyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:39 PM
-8

Quite the contrary. One things for sure, I'm not disappointed by athletes because I don't idolize them.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:37 PM
0

Never said it was better. Never even said whether I idolize my neighbor or not. I probably wouldn't use that term. But if I did, that's who it would be. But never said it's better. I said people who idolize sports athletes deserve to be disappointed if/when they meet them, in reference to the guy I commented on.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:37 PM
2

People can idolize who they want and I'm free to call them a fucking idiot for doing so. I don't think Serena Williams needs you to defend her from the likes of me.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:34 PM
-3

Aww, what's a matter? The poor sports baller needs you to defend her?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:33 PM
0

Goteem
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:31 PM
1

Perfectly acceptable to admire their drive, their work ethic, their skill. But for them to be your hero?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:31 PM
0

Dude, I don't care who won what match, game, friendly, or any other thing. The point was that you sad I have a sad life because I don't idolize sports people and I responded sardonicly that I couldn't care less who wins what.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:28 PM
0

I'm sure my neighbor doesn't give a rats ass whether I do or don't because he doesn't need external validation.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:07 PM
3

Answered on my edit, oh wise sage.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:03 PM
-17

And if your goal in life is to be a good person, probably not a great idea for your hero to be a sports baller.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:03 PM
-13

Yeah, the guy who gambled so heavily he owed a drug dealer $108k and had documented extra marital affairs? No thanks.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 03:01 PM
-1

Because what I do for living has anything to do with whether people should idolize people who play sports for a living.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 02:59 PM
0

No. That's also why I wouldn't idolize someone for playing sports.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 02:58 PM
2

Yeah, totally. We should idolize even shittier people.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 02:57 PM
-11

You got me. So sad that someone who whacks a ball around lost to someone who whacked it better.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 02:57 PM
-12

You got me. Ego really took a bruise because one person was better at whacking a ball over a net than someone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 02:54 PM
-98

Anyone whose "hero" is someone who hits a ball with anything for a living deserves to be disappointed. Edit: You all are hysterical. Yes, let's idolize someone who whacks a ball over a net, instead of maybe... I don't know... someone like my neighbor, who raised three kids on his own after his wife passed, volunteers at a food bank, gives blood every month, makes charitable contributions to the local homeless shelter, delivered meals on wheels for years, served his country, and is involved in gr…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 01:24 PM
28

This story absolutely goes a long way to show that people are people and there's nothing special because you have a vagina, are a certain skin tone, or choose a certain religion that prevents you from being an asshole like the rest of us. Almost like it's the level of power that's the problem and not the person in power.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/18 06:09 PM
62

Basically the same behavior as someone like a Harvey Weinstein, except their was no intercourse... the accuser alleges forced touching of the accused's breasts and unwelcome kissing/touching of the accuser from the accused. The accused is a lesbian professor and the accuser is a gay advisee, so it obviously complicates the traditional "sexual" aspect of sexual harassment, but the internal investigation did determine title 9 violations. In addition, many feminist allies of the accused took to her…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/18 06:06 PM
6

You equated laughing at someone who got RAPED to laughing at men willingly debasing themselves. They are your words. There's nothing to interpret... let alone interpret incorrectly. Why don't you try phrasing it differently if that's not what you meant, instead of trying to argue that's not what you said? Because it clearly is EXACTLY what you said.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 09:57 PM
4

What you actually said: It's the equivalent of laughing at a men who went to a bar and got date rape drugged by the same woman over and over. Laughing at RAPE and laughing at men WILLINGLY volunteering to be dehumanized are NOT the same thing. Can't believe I have to explain this to you using your own freaking words.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:07 PM
10

Yes. Laughing at someone who against their will got RAPED is the same thing as laughing at guys WILLINGLY subjecting themselves to dehumanizing treatment and voluntary debasement of their self worth. You are the upsetting one here.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:30 PM
43

The only thing upsetting is that there are "men" who were so thirsty and have so low a level of self respect that they actually went through with this shit.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:37 PM
4

That's not the point though. The point is that you don't willingly open up the system to abuse and allowing someone in a government position to dictate someone's life and well being if they've gone through the system and been found not guilty. Even if most of us suspect it. If private businesses want to stay away, that's their prerogative. But government has no business interfering.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 04:10 PM
3

Well, to be honest, the most vocal, adamant, and rude comments I've seen are from people accusing people of being hysterical. I haven't seen one commenter actually be hysterical about the sign.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 10:55 PM
2

Literally no one is getting hysterical except you. You're on some tirade against a boogeyman. Some guy posted something on the internet in a specific group for thiskind of thing and you are here screaming about nothing. No one is hysterical. No one is screaming. No one is jihading. No one is unleashing the dogs of war. You are being WAY over the top with this, which makes me question what you're actual motivation is.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:43 PM
2

People pointing out hypocrisy in signage is about as far from jihad as it gets, my friend.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:52 PM
1

Or it's politely pointing out hypocrisy, instead of actually displaying outrage, which your dumbass can't seem to differentiate. It's funny how the only outrage displayed and the only person acting like a child is you, yet that's your biggest complaint. Project much?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:03 PM
2

You don't have a deeper understanding of anything, other than playground insults, than I do. Well, that and raging about people not actually raging.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:01 PM
8

Exactly. It says mommies on the sign and family changing station on the website.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:40 AM
13

And we assume you don't, by your moronic, impotent rage.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:25 AM
10

It's not an assumption when it specifically excludes fathers on the signage. This gentleman didn't display outrage by not demanding he be allowed access and you're here bleating on about fake outrage that didn't happen. I know concepts are difficult to grasp, but this is 3rd grade stuff.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:24 AM
1

The only outrage I see is your idiotic lashing out at concepts you fail to grasp.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:21 AM
18

Elsewhere in the thread, it's linked that it is, in fact, a family changing station. Families don't include fathers?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:20 AM
9

Non-intersectional, maybe. But name one 3rd wave feminist that is rational. Genuinely. I'd be curious to check it out.
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 04:06 AM
1

It's called a generality. It means that more often than not, something holds true. More often than not, people who eat healthy and exercise are sick less and require less care. And yes, saying "that's not always the case" IS only one example of how that statement can be not true. When you speak in generalities, you have to give general counterexamples... we are speaking in plurals. I don't say "people who eat healthy and exercise are sick less" (a generality) and you go "but what about Tommy and…
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 02:41 PM
2

I'm sure you will. And I appreciate your thoughtful response. As will I, brother.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 06:46 AM
3

Hey brother, we've all done it and I hope if you catch me slipping, you'll do the same for me. We all need to support each other in this battle. One thing those with opposing viewpoints do well is present a unified voice. We need to help each and every one of us to do the same. Like I said though man, very well reasoned, thoughtful, insightful, and salient points you make. You are definitely a strong voice for your beliefs. Keep it up!
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 06:08 AM
4

Not going to change many people's minds like that brother. Your points are all valid, salient, and we'll rationed. Try making your retorts the same. This guy is obviously here. Which is a huge step in the right direction towards clearer thinking. Let's not push him away, ay? Even if never goes his own way, clearing men's heads should be the ultimate goal and fomenting resentment for being belittled isn't going to accomplish that.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 05:14 AM
3

Healthcare being insanely expensive is unique to America and the reasons are probably unique too. There's a much more reasonable and rational take. Ok, not to get too in depth, but there are a couple of factors unique to the American system that have caused the healthcare crisis. One of the biggest is healthcare lobbyists enacting legislation that has crippled any competition in the market. Ok, you say... Well then let's go single payer. While that would actually improve the system in the short …
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 02:47 AM
2

Funny, isn't it. Where the government doesn't intrude, like say a pharmacy or convenience store, the same cough drop costs like $1 in my country too. So if it's the exact same cough drop, I wonder how they can get away with charging $10 because the physical location of the sale of the cough drop changed?
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 02:24 AM
2

Ooh ouch. You totally got me. What are you, 19? You have no idea why that cough drop costs $10. And you have no idea why this country, even after the abortion that was Obamacare, STILL has medical tourists because this country has the highest quality medical care in the world. So do your homework and stop thinking linking one tweet means you know what you're talking about.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 02:13 AM
0

You spend less because you get lower quality.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:36 AM
5

Yes, you're right. In speaking about generalities, even one example of an opposite case scenario makes the point completely illegitimate. How stupid of him.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:30 AM
10

Technically... Neither one is wishing anything. They both said they are "not concerned" with some event. Wishing rape is far worse than wishing job loss. But being "not concerned" about it greys the difference between the statements significantly. Wishing you to die is a FAR different statement from "I'm not concerned about you dying". And in this light, I think there is a point in that if OP said "I'm not concerned about the Twitter lady getting raped", he would get crucified and possibly lose …
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 02:12 AM
10

You said "You just referred to JUDAISM (emphasis mine) as "barbaric"." in your reply. But you quoted the actual statement "*CIRCUMCISION (emphasis mine) is a barbaric form of “surgery”. Circumcision =/= Judaism
/r/MensRights13/07/18 11:38 AM
12

Great to know what hospitals to avoid. Thank you. I'm sure he appreciates you posting his extremely controversial position on the internet, as well.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:44 AM
31

Oh, well we better mutilate baby dicks just in case a rare event actually occurs! Matter of fact, my baby might develop an ear infection later in life... off with their ears! Shit... what about pink eye? Most babies get that at some point. Stab its fucking eyes out!
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:40 AM
22

Circumcision is a barbaric form of “surgery” You just referred to Judaism as "barbaric". Are you really sure you want to side with the Nazis? Literally contradicted yourself in your own quote, dumbass.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:09 AM
9

Thank you for expressing your point of view.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:01 AM
15

Don't worry... even if you talk to them, you're still not interacting with them. Interacting implies having a reciprocal effect on something. There's nothing going in over there... only regurgitated platitudes out. Same level of interaction as a septic tank.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:00 AM
2

Both can be true though brother. You can think both the girl and the guy she cheats with are scum. And to go one step further, you can think both are scum, not rage, move on with your life, and learn from what happened and not repeat the same mistakes. That's the ultimate peace.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 02:19 AM
4

It's actually quite rational to question the validity of a rape accusation... especially when the accuser did not go to the police and had motive to lie about it. Don't use words that don't fit your argument. Especially when they are loaded and designed to poison the well.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 02:00 AM
2

That's line the 3rd or 4th time I've heard that recently. Any reason(s) why you believe that? I'd love to be enlightened.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 01:57 AM
4

I'm sure reddit will remind me.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:01 PM
141

Why are their mugshots never made public? We shame the fuck out of any guy even remotely accused of rape, but a woman lies directly to authorities... nothing.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 03:26 AM
4

Go to most churches on a Sunday. Chock full of women pecking at their beaten down, shoulder slumped husbands.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 02:08 AM
3

More like when an entire group from another sub "comes to visit" and downvotes everybody.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 02:05 AM
9

No, but that can make someonea useful ally, even if temporarily.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 03:00 PM
2

I think it's more his opinion has changed with less conspiracy type guests being on into an "I just don't know" camp than he used to be. Guests like NDT, Lawrence Kraus, that CIA guy (those people "in the establishment") can be persuasive and Rogan has always bent towards the guest or new information. I think it's less "he's being paid or pressured into starting quiet" than it is "his opinion has shifted from being convinced of conspiracy to just not being sure".
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:58 PM
1

While I definitely agree that that is probably a part of it, I also think there's another big factor at play. Think about it. Rogan has always swayed his opinion to whomever the guest is or any new information he learns, if only just a bit. He's lately had "bigger name" guests on as his podcast has gotten more popular. Well, people like Neil Degrasse Tyson, Lawrence Kraus, that CIA guy (forget his name) can be very persuasive and to someone like Rogan, I'm not surprised it's taken him from a fir…
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:54 PM
2

I just want to say I appreciate your patience with our earlier "guest". I believe he followed me here after I responded to a comment he made elsewhere and he felt the need to vomit up his social behavior theories. I think courtesy like yours to people we disagree with is what's needed more frequently to keep discussions open and change people's minds and I just wanted to let you know that as a bystander, I appreciate the way you dealt politely, but firmly with them.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:44 PM
1

While I agree with your point, for the most part, I'll point out that science itself isn't fraudulent nor corruptible, it's the interpretation of data that can be twisted to fit a desired outcome. Science is just a method. Just being pedantic for clarity.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:37 PM
7

There are literally dozens of studies that say it's a human biological preference for women to mate with a man of higher status with more resources for evolutionary reasons, even in more egalitarian societies and that women have been doing this for WAY longer than the written word for every one study that kinda says the opposite. What is the most egalitarian society currently? Sweden? Ok, we need a study there to see if women, on average, marry closer to in group than above group. Not some surve…
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 03:05 AM
4

I have a feeling it's a number 2... Literally and figuratively.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:46 AM
4

Ok, so what exactly as you disagreeing with in the statement "hypergamy exists and it is a part of human nature"? If social development is curbing hypergamy, how do you not agree that that is society's evolution overcoming natural instinct?
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:44 AM
14

I think it's good to point it out so reposts don't get out of control, but I didn't see it and now am aware.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:38 AM
3

I mean, it's not even disputed that it occurs... only what causes it. But you and I are the "idiots" for even acknowledging it. Thus proving my original point about the hypocrisy of believing you hold the monopoly of science, while ignoring it when it's inconvenient. Literally the opposite of scientific.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:37 AM
4

Cause you have your eyes closed and your ears shut, my man. Hell, even a simple wikipedia scan will tell you it's a legitimate occurrence, even if the cause is disputed. Try doing your homework, champ.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:33 AM
8

While I don't disagree with anything you said, I guess my question/statement is more a philosophical pondering on human nature... How can a group of people who profess to have Science as the backbone of their ideology, completely ignore it when it comes to evolutionary theory because it disagrees with them?
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:29 AM
2

Care to cite a source for that, champ?
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:23 AM
66

I don't even understand how the idea of hypergamy in women is even a question at this point. It is so fundamental in nature, that I'm baffled by the idea that it could be called into question.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:07 AM
1

Having an issue with the effects of something doesn't mean not only you have an issue with the thing itself, but also want it banned. A complaint about IG's effects or the way people use it is not a complaint about the fact that IG exists not is it a request to ban it.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/18 09:59 PM
-1

Translation: I have no counterargument, so deflect and appeal to emotions.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:04 AM
2

Yes, I absolutely would and I know my friends would absolutely do the same for me. I feel bad forpurple who don't have friends that can be honest with them... especially in the moment and especially with humor in dark moments!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 11:34 PM
2

PS... That's completely ignoring the fabulous court system which obviously had implicit bias towards women. Only 3% of alimony payments are women to men. That's an exponentially larger bias ratio than the mythical "wage gap". Obvious implicit.... scratch that, explicit bias there. Or how about custody? Must be implicit bias towards women with custody favoring women 80%-20%. Oh wait... that's just explicit bias. So talk all you want about implicit bias. But if you're going to play the game that t…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 11:11 PM
4

We can reasonably assume that there is an implicit bias involved No we can't. And one study looking via confirmation bias for it doesn't prove the point. Are we to assume, based on your logic, that if males dominate a certain field, then there is implicit bias, that there is implicit bias against men being elementary teachers and nurses? Are we also to assume that the patriarchy are keeping women out of garbage collecting, sewer repair, and heavy manual labor jobs such as oil riggers and roofing…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 10:47 PM
25

Bingo! Which is why it comes as a total shock to most women, especially the attractive ones, that their husbands or boyfriends could disagree with them or find them annoying or not funny. Every other male in their life thinks they're hysterical, and awesome, and so smart, and have really important things to say... according to them. It's only the guy who's already been in her pants that will tell it to her straight and even then, in today's world, most guys won't.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 09:35 PM
11

Why are you being redundant?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 09:30 PM
5

Show me one example of someone saying there aren't lots of men who are guilty of sexual harassment. One. Your problem is that you conflate people complaining about double standards with meaning that's somehow people defending sexual harassment. Which is obvious in your use of whataboutism as a defense.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:49 PM
3

What would you call it?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:46 PM
4

Oh yeah, I'll bet. Considering you deflected the original argument by moving the goalposts, then when called out, ranted about men harassing women, having nothing to do with the double standard being discussed. But I'm sure you don't blame men.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:03 PM
6

Could you possibly move the goal posts any further? Jesus. No one...NO ONE... I repeat, NO ONE is saying there aren't "lots and lots of men guilty of sexual harassment. What we are saying is there is absolutely a double standard in the court of public opinion (and actual court as well) and it's because of garbage humans like you who play teams between the genders. You're garbage and I have a news flash for you... it's not men's fault that you're garbage. It's you. Not sorry.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:54 PM
1

No worries man... I'm all in favor of a good back and forth. Thank you for providing a relatively respectable one!
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 07:51 PM
1

Brother, if you're not insecure about not lifting, more power to you. But your argument that cars are natural and lifting weights isn't would belie an insecurity in that area. Could be wrong.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 07:21 PM
1

Dude, last time... If driving a car is natural, so is body building. Here's why. Driving came from walking. It started as the most basic form of transportation (walking) and has evolved into driving a car that is manufactured in a way to include not just physically moving from point A to point B... comfort, style, safety, aesthetics, speed, etc. Body building came from lifting heavy things. It started as the most basic form of work (manual labor) and has evolved into body building that is no lon…
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 07:03 PM
1

Well, neither was mine.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:55 PM
1

So your entire argument is moving from place to place is natural = cars are natural? So a feather in the wind moves from place to place. It's doing the exact same thing as a car you know.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:45 PM
1

Dude! So every car is built solely with transporting things from A to B in mind? You can't include luxury, comfort, fun, entertainment, etc in building a car because then the "purpose would be different"? Men lifted heavy things. They found they got stronger. They lifted heavier things and they got even stronger. That led to helping with their jobs, being healthier people, getting laid more frequently, and feeling better about themselves. So if cars can have multiple fucking purposes, so can fuc…
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:43 PM
1

Besides, transportation originated with fucking walking. We didn't domesticated horses for fucking journeys when we were in caves. But we sure as shit were already lifting heavy things repitiously. Jesus. Who would even argue weight lifting is unnatural except a guy who feels bad that he doesn't?
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:36 PM
1

Holy fuck, are you serious? Then by your own logic, body building is an extension or enhanced form of building strength capacity derived from originally doing manual labor and strengthening the muscles needed to do the manual labor. Building muscles and strength is as natural as it gets man.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:33 PM
1

Says the guy who said cars are a natural form of transportation.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:28 PM
1

I eat my cows still alive, I eat out my girlfriend on her period, and I wash it all down with raw eggs and bull semen. As manly as it gets. My prostate cancer, hpv, and cholesterol treatments are all going well, btw.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:27 PM
1

How do you figure they don't mimic "reps and sets"? Those activities are literally lifting a heavy object, in a repitious manner, repeatedly. Modes of transportation didn't look the same back then either, but you've called cars natural elsewhere, for Christ's sake. If steroids and good protein sources were "around" back then, men who built log cabins, worked on railroads, carried kills back to camp, and stone masons would absolutely look the same way. (Since we're both copying and pasting)
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:23 PM
1

It's literally a heavy object, moved repitiously, repeatedly. It's an exact equivalence. Lol
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:19 PM
2

How do you figure they don't mimic "reps and sets"? Those activities are literally lifting a heavy object, in a repitious manner, repeatedly. Modes of transportation didn't look the same back then either, but you've called cars natural elsewhere, for Christ's sake. If steroids and good protein sources were "around" back then, men who built log cabins, worked on railroads, carried kills back to camp, and stone masons would absolutely look the same way.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:18 PM
1

So picking up logs to stack them from the ground up to build a house isn't repitious? Carrying a carcass home over a long distance isn't lifting a weight for stamina? Lifting up stone after stone to put in place for a stone home or gathering place isn't "doing reps"? What are you talking about man? Lifting heavy things repitiously is human nature.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:06 PM
1

Every single one that carried a carcass back to camp after a kill or hauled a downed tree back to the encampment to create a new home or grabbed buckets or bladders of water from the creek a half mile away... Lifting weights repetitiously is extremely natural.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:04 PM
1

So is lifting weights. You don't think the carcass carried itself back to camp after the kill on its own, do you?
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:02 PM
2

Honestly, upvote for the irony in explaining why people actually do give a shit about what other people say, despite that they say they don't and then editing in an absolute "I don't give a shit" comment at the end. Brilliant!
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 06:00 PM
6

Holy fuck. Google "false imprisonment for rape" before you write something that glaringly stupid.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 05:33 PM
7

No one is saying that all those men are innocent, dumbass. The comparison is that lots and lots of men have been forced to resign or fired for mere accusations and women are left to their posts unless found guilty in a court of law. It's called a double standard. Google it, if you need help.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 05:31 PM
9

Man, you're just missing the point entirely because you are so focused on her needing to have physically forced him into sex acts. Any sexual act that one party was forced into, even if that force is threatening to cry "rape" on him is sexual assault. Period. why did he stay and let it happen? Because she threatened him with the possibility of being accused of rape. That's coercion and thus rape. If you left after the hand thing and called the cops and she cried rape then what? handcuff him and …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/18 05:17 AM
24

DUDE... just because the outcome resulted in his favor, does not mean his reasoning was off.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/18 05:01 AM
14

Use it til it's gone FTFY
/r/MGTOW13/05/18 03:40 AM
12

Great post. You really do bring up a good point. No more "taking your man card" bullshit. We need to show solidarity with guys like this.
/r/MGTOW13/05/18 03:39 AM
5

Honestly, we men need to show solidarity for guys like this. If men can support each other, maybe things can turn around a bit.
/r/MGTOW13/05/18 03:38 AM
2

It's not just 'someone' to talk to. It's someone who can relate, especially from a male perspective. We were all taught that men don't talk about their feelings. Then when the women in our lives said it's ok to talk to them and they couldn't relate, we shut down even further. Talk. Talk about things. Important things. Stupid things. But find a good male friend in and amongst everyone else to talk to brother.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:01 AM
5

Here's my issue with that line of thinking... of course, the natural reaction to false accusations, especially in cases as egregious as this, is for vengeance. The argument against heavy punishment for coming forward then becomes "liars won't confess if there are harsh consequences". While I understand that logic, I have 2 problems with it. 1)Liars are liars. People who have no morality and not enough compassion for their fellow humans to not lie, cannot be the basis for adjudication and sentenc…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:36 AM
8

While I totally agree with you that the indoctrination is in full force, this sounds like utter horseshit virtue signaling to me, rather than a reallife scenario. Kids will definitely parrot the shit they're fed, unfortunately, but I find it suspect that a kid on their own gender discriminated. Sounds more like a feminist making shit up for fake internet points. As opposed to me... making fun of making shit up for fake internet points for fake internet points.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/18 06:26 AM
8

Guy's story is a made response to girl's story that is also made up. It's how Twitter shows responses. Both stories are made up though. No kid cries because of the gender of their dentist.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/18 05:38 AM
17

Do you really think... I mean really think some kid cried because of the gender of their dentist? Does that even remotely sound like normal kid behavior to you? Or do you think the mom is a feminist nutcase who made it up completely and is making a political statement via an appeal to emotions?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/18 05:28 AM
3

Or it'll make women be damn sure they were raped before they throw out baseless accusations that derail mens' careers.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/18 10:59 PM
1

You're disturbed that other human beings judge other human beings? You must be new here...
/r/PussyPass17/02/18 05:24 PM
1

It's not a stupid rule. Underarm sweat has some of the highest levels of bacteria and if left to drip on equipment, can cause all kinds of illness. When wicked and evaporated through a sleeved shirt, far less transfer occurs. Just because this girl doesn't understand why the rule is in place doesn't mean it's dumb or about modesty.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/18 05:06 PM
-68

Cunt. Oh wait, I thought we were just saying dirty words.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/17 01:04 AM
2

You kind of hit on the big issue at hand. If there is a discrepancy in genders, a la "Red Pill", then neither "side" has a gripe... nature has immutable rules that we all must follow and therefore "Red Pillers" should, in theory, be preaching FOR gender equality, as they believe they are 'beta' and should want to be treated no differently than the 'alphas'. But again, I hope you will take some time to talk to or learn from some better representatives of the male gender and the issues we struggle…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 10:33 PM
0

While I agree that "red pillers" and "MGTOW" tend to exaggerate certain very specific things that biology says, all the while ignoring, as you said, social conditioning... I think there is some conflating the Men's Rights movement with "red pilling" happening. The same as there are many branches of feminism, some more inclusive, some more toxic, there are many branches of the Men's Rights movement. As you stated earlier, blaming one gender for all your problems is at best unhelpful, at worst har…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:51 PM
-5

Couldn't agree more. Have a good day!
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:10 PM
-1

I mean, I could see where a few parts that were questionable could be considered to have "supremacist" ideas, but curious which you found the most objectionable? And as we agree, there are definitely legitimate aspects of every group or ideology and there are definitely dangerous aspects of every group and ideology. Usually when a group or ideology takes itself as seriously as a religion.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:09 PM
8

Just like any group people identify with, there are good elements and bad. People with good intentions, people with bad. I recommend finding a doc called the Red Pill, if you really are interested in some of the more "legitimate" aspects of the MRA movement, but overall I'd say it's about the same thing that feminism is about, exposing discrepancies in the way one gender is treated vs another... just from the male perspective... whether it be professionally, personally, judicially, etc.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 08:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter