| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How is this okay???It is lost on this author that ALL abusers ARE monsters, even if they aren't freakishly disfigured. That by itself makes the statement wrong, even if we don't get into abuse statistics. They become monsters, afterwards. You can't see it in advance. That's what the question is. Can you easily tell who would abuse you before it happens? No. You will only see a person. And since the question is from the point of view of a woman in a relationship, that person is most likely to be a man, because homo… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/17 06:46 PM |
| -2 | How is this okay???It does not say that abusers are "mostly men, not women." It says abusers are "mostly men, not monsters." It means that you can't tell who might become abusive in the future. That an abusive personality is not a visible trait. The question is "Can you identify potential abusers easily?" and the answer is "No." Edit: The test is from a woman's point of view, most likely because it's for women to take. It's about abuse in relationships, especially domestic abuse. Since it's about a woman and relat… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/17 06:14 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter