TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Eiberdon Archive

View 0 posts and 55 comments by Eiberdon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well now you've compared raising kids to training them how to do jobs. What is a woman's job, then?
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 08:29 AM
1

Yeah that's kinda my point. Which is why it's odd that you refer to it like someone would refer to training a dog.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 01:26 AM
1

To clarify I was saying you were comparing raising a person to training a dog and that's what my issue is.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 01:25 AM
1

Your religious traditions are probably very familiar to me. Religious traditions are a key part of why I'm not religious.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 01:15 AM
0

No, most people don't actually. Sex is almost worthless outside of the medical profession. Gender is the only thing that matters when interacting with people.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 01:12 AM
1

I would start off by pointing out that notion that you "home train" people is one of those signs that someone is less deserving of your respect than others.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 01:09 AM
1

Run out of scripture to quote or just realised not everyone cares about a book written thousands of years ago?
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 12:51 AM
1

Oooh you're religious. Yeah your attitude to churning out little robotic versions of yourself rather than actual people makes more sense now. I do not have children but if I ever decide I want to I would teach them to treat people with respect until they've demonstrated they deserve more or less of it
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 12:44 AM
1

I wouldn't call that "home training". And teaching people how to behave doesn't equal enforcing outdated stereotypes about how men and women are "meant" to behave either
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 12:38 AM
1

It denotes sex, not gender.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 12:30 AM
1

"home training". Are they dogs?
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/22 12:29 AM
0

No, stereotypes of all forms are bad and they attempt to force people to conform to someone else's notion of what "x group" should be like
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 09:31 AM
-1

Boy, I've always wondered where this idea that it's a man's "biological instinct" to defend women even came from because a majority of academic literature sure doesn't take that stance Your character definitely does not show you as a functional member of society. By your logic you're someone who needs to be dealt with. What does that entail, exactly?
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 02:23 AM
-12

Masculinity is just being comfortable with the fact that you're a man. Toxic masculinity is anything that forces your masculinity onto other people. This would include things like "men protect women, other men aren't allowed emotions" and things like that. See?
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 02:18 AM
0

So it's your character that makes you act as if women need you to protect them?
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 02:17 AM
-11

Wow you've walked directly into the problem and still haven't managed to see it. Gender roles and stereotypes are bad.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 02:16 AM
-1

Well tough because they are men. You said so yourself "of course from other men".
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 02:13 AM
-7

You see the irony of saying "we protect you...from us!" Don't you?
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 02:02 AM
-4

Protect them from what? Other men?
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 01:42 AM
4

Eh that just sounds like people aren't happy that they're not the guy who sleeps with multiple women. Poly relationships aren't inherently bad in either way. If your partner can't fulfill all of your sexual urges (usually no one partner can fulfill all of someone's sexual urges) it makes sense to find another. Some people successfully raise children in these sorts of relationships, other people don't want to raise children.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 12:50 AM
1

Super interested where the "this will leave a lot of women with below average looks" came from
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 12:39 AM
1

You understand that the patriarchy hurts us men as well, don't you? It's not a made up concept either and saying it is just shows you don't really understand what you're talking about. It just means "male dominated" and society is male dominated.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 11:43 PM
1

You've really got a thing about cishet males don't ya
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:47 PM
1

Yes. Not supporting the community that fights for the rights they enjoy is pretty homophobic. Again, as I'm guessing you also skipped over this part, you can be discriminatory to your own group. In this case a gay people having internalised homophobia And to clarify being called homophobic isn't "name calling" this isn't high school. You've very clearly demonstrated biphobia and other anti-LGBT sentiments during this short but oh-so-painful interaction.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:46 PM
1

So you want to dehumanise anyone associated with the LGBT community? Which would include the LGBT people themselves. That's a pretty big yikes my dude
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:40 PM
1

The group's name is the LGBT community. Or the LGBTQIA+ community. But yes saying "people with brain cells" is accurate. You're discovering biology here, I'm oddly proud.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:38 PM
1

Do you need me to remind you of when I told you that's an umbrella term for anti-LGBT sentiment?
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:37 PM
1

Oh so you actually legitimately don't even understand what you're saying when you call someone a rainbow? That's actually fucking hilarious
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:34 PM
1

It's really funny you said this because uh...you guys did make a group and a flag. But to reiterate, because you clearly skip over reading anything that goes against the delusional narrative you've built yourself here, you're biphobic because you only like "straight" women. When bisexual women are also valid options for you and the only possible reason you could have for not liking them is their sexuality
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:34 PM
1

1) Pretty sure I did 2) I've never actually stated my sexuality, you've just assumed it 3) I'm vocal about all forms of equality, despite the fact that people like you make it very hard to care
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:29 PM
1

You've probably accidentally stumbled into a really nuanced topic here. But I'll clear some things up for you. Read my message again and notice the very specific language I used. Heterophobia does exist on an individual basis but it's absolutely not as widespread as homophobia/other forms of anti-LGBT sentiment. And to clear something up it's possible for someone to be discriminatory towards their own group. So all people are capable of individual heterophobia.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:26 PM
1

Well now you've just stopped trying to make any kind of sense whatsoever. It's pretty sad you live a life of so much hate though. Learn to love and stop hating on the gays and women 💜
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:23 PM
1

Yeah "homophobic" is just a neat umbrella term used when people are anti-LGBT. It's literally impossible for you to have not already known that
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:20 PM
1

I know right, isn't it odd that heterophobic isn't actually a word 🤔 probably because it's not really a major thing like homophobia is And to answer your question no, it doesn't. Nor does being straight. Being straight and saying you only like "straight women" does make you biphobic. As does being gay and only liking other gay people and no bi people of the same sex as you
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:17 PM
1

Oh dear, there's so much to unpack here but I find myself stuck on the fact that you don't know the term "heterophobic" It's certainly biphobic to specifically like heterosexual women and not bisexual women as well, btw
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 08:09 PM
1

"I like straight women very much" well at least the bisexual women are safe from you. But yes that does make you homophobic. And also quite possibly misogynistic too, you should appreciate the existence of all women not just the ones that fit your boring worldview Also I've never actually seen any part of any of the communities I'm in legitimately suggest any of those things. People like you encounter one or two extremists and just go "yup, all those pesky gays must be like this"
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:59 PM
1

Actually it was the way you referred to LGBT people and feminists, then implied we're like walls (which you actually reinforced with that comment), which is dehumanising an entire community of people. So yes, I'd say that makes you pretty homophobic. You need to let the manly thing go and get it into your head no one ever complained about people being manly. I mocked someone for suggesting that appearing unmanly is a bad thing, and I've never once said anything about people who appear manly.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:46 PM
1

Oh wow you actually get harder to understand with each message. You're the one that actually changed the subject by switching to what subreddits I'm active in. But outing yourself as a homophobic woman hater was amusing for me, thank you for that
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:39 PM
2

You do seem kinda delusional, yes. Being straight is still very much the social norm.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:33 PM
1

Hm, it doesn't literally say that. It literally says "are the straight ok" nice try in your attempt to reframe that though
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:25 PM
1

Yes, I like equality and not hating on women, LGBT people and those who don't fit the social norms. Truly an awful quality for a person to possess, whatever shall become of me 😂
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:21 PM
1

No my comment had literally nothing to do with appearing manly and everything to do with mocking the idea that appearing unmanly is a bad thing. It's two entirely different things.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:13 PM
-1

Then that's entirely their problem. If you don't like men appearing to be "unmanly" then don't dress unmanly but don't force your opinions onto others.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 07:05 PM
2

I never judged anyone for that. I mocked someone for suggesting that appearing to be "unmanly" was a bad thing
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 06:58 PM
-1

I don't see what about not wanting to be sexually harassed comes across as childish to you?
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 11:31 AM
–

Not how DNA works
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 10:44 AM
-1

A healthy dose of victim blaming women for men not being able to control their actions to start my day
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 10:33 AM
-3

Oh no, anything but being unmanly!
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 10:30 AM
2

What's the issue with men wearing skirts?
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 10:27 AM
1

Yeah, medicine is typically researchered and tailored using men as the model unless it's specifically for a female problem.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:50 AM
2

This goes fundamentally against how evolution works, evolution doesn't have notions of "bodycounts". You're applying human concepts to scientific theory here.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:46 AM
1

Naturally the guy is also a virgin too, right?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:44 AM
1

To clarify are you calling all feminists misandrists?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:35 AM
3

Still definitely not the argument you wanna go down tbh. "You wouldn't be here if men didn't put in minimal levels of efforts compared to women" is not a solid argument
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:32 AM
3

I don't think you wanna go down the birth route here, bud. Pretty sure women definitely do most the work there
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter