TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Einsteinsmooostache Archive

View 1 post and 17 comments by Einsteinsmooostache on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Einsteinsmooostache/r/askTRP15/10/15 05:46 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think your interpretation is too narrow. Of course we have a choice to live or die, but his point is that suicide is logically inconsistent with an acceptance of the absurd (I'm assuming you have an understanding of how he defines the absurd). By living an absurd life you are free from hope, expectations, and therefore disappointment (not to say it is easy to achieve!). As far as next I'm uncertain. Camus is still a relatively contemporary figure so I'm not sure what works have compounded his …
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:35 PM
1

Haha. Awe that's cute. You proved nothing. You made a linguistic leap that included zero structural arguments. Did you think your post was academic quality philosophy? Other commenters and I have acknowledged your journey and offered suggestions to further your search (and no philosophical search is ever complete), yet you dismiss and refute like a woman told she can't have what she wants. Learn some humility and understand that with philosophy there is no end in sight.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 09:48 PM
3

I was trying to help you answer your question. You're trying to artificially impose a meaning in your life, which is just hamstering.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 05:53 PM
2

The next step on this existential journey is to venture into the absurd with Albert Camus. In "the myth of sisyphus" Camus sets out to prove whether suicide can be a logical conclusion to living a meaningless life. It's a brilliant piece of philosophy. He doesn't rely on any crutches of meaning to reach the conclusion that suicide is not in fact rational and that the absurd man loves a life of revolt, passion, and freedom. It's the most RP look at philosophy I've ever read.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 03:58 PM
6

You should read "art of war". Being a leader does not mean taking on any challenge, it means making a calculated move to ensure you have an advantage.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/16 02:52 PM
1

I think you overlook that sometimes segregated social circles represent a multidimensional character rather than a need to please. For example, I behave different around my athlete friends, intellectual friends, casual bar friends, women, gym friends, and family. This isn't born from a desire to please, it's fulfilling my need to practice each of my passions in a related social circle. But to your point, chameleons do exist and are a danger. A well rounded man is a treat to find. And I say that …
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 06:17 PM
8

You mistake self-interest for evil. People are not evil, they're self-interested.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/15 10:12 PM
1

You can have all the degrees in the world but that doesn't make your comment any less false. Please provide a reputable study that shows humans respond to the magnetic fields from other people's brain waves and I'll read.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/15 10:01 PM
5

That's a load of bull shit pseudoscience. Moving charges do create magnetic fields, but the magnitude of a brains magnetic field is going to be so incredibly small that it would pale in comparison to even the tiny changes of earths magnetic field. Source: physics degree I enjoy this sub, please don't pollute with fake science.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/15 09:06 PM
11

Not sure he's the greatest red pill example but I do love me some dick Feynman! A contributing factor to me majoring in physics. I'd say he's a man who understood RP philosophy but didn't necessarily want to practice it.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 01:53 AM
1

Removing: alcohol, tobacco, porn Adding: gym mon-sat, reading/writing daily
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 04:49 PM
-1

This is an unhelpful cop out. She's my boss - so some things, yes she deserves to take the credit on. She's also very cool and does give me credit when due. EDIT: I respect the hell out of what trp stands for, but posts like the one I responded to here is what gives it a bad name. I received some fantastic answers - this was not one. There's no theory, no analysis, no content. This is hamstering plain and simple. The fact that I'm downvoted for calling out a shit post makes me question the QC on…
/r/askTRP15/10/15 12:46 PM
1

Not sales, but still great response. Really like presenting problems it in a way that lets her choose from options rather than open ended. Unfortunately it's not so black and white - part of her position is almost as a fixer. A bunch of people come to her when stuck. It will remain unavoidable at times. Thanks for the input though man, this helps me enough to hopefully help myself.
/r/askTRP15/10/15 12:44 PM
1

I believe it done was by measuring the shadow at the same time in different locations. Some story of a runner reporting the measurements to the scientist (though I can't recall who). Measuring at different times of day would give you rotational info but to extract circumference would take knowing distance away from the sun. Radians/degrees --> length requires a length measurement they wouldn't have had.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 03:56 PM
1

Thank you sir. If only others shared your view.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 04:40 PM
2

Yea I hear what you're saying, and not intending to be militant - just trying to provide another perspective. But as you said, God takes the place where science can't fill. This is known as God-of-the-gaps. The problem I have with this type of argument is that it's scope is constantly being diminished. In my view of things, I prefer to begin at a null argument and build based on evidence as opposed to beginning with a grand theory (that presupposes at the very least an equal amount of pre big-ba…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 02:48 PM
0

This is awfully handwavy. We stupid humans can even use the measure of a current earth year to go back and approximate the age of the universe to ~13.7 billion years. The same way we've redefined the second over the years to finally be a measure of a given number of cycles between radiation levels in a cesium 133 atom. By creating similar 'clocks' you can define an earth year before the earth actually revolved around the sun. All this is to say it baffles me how one can conveniently cherry pick …
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 01:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter