TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Eklektikos99 Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by Eklektikos99 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

No, they want the man to suffer out of sadism. Men like you keep signing up for it too, dating women and submitting to their desire for kids. to use them against you. Then when it happens, you want your online validation instead of fighting back.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 04:25 PM
-1

Wrong. Below average on one dating app survey does not mean they would date all the men above average either, whether the mark is 50%, 80%, or 1%. You don't understand cause and effect and statistics.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:21 PM
0

Dang, the copers downvoted you a ton here. Truth hurts, copers.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:19 PM
3

His point of view makes sense. Yours comes from a self-loathing mindset. Stop dreaming and wake up. Stop denying the reality of human mate selection and stop the sophism. Then you'll be able to start having empathy and making any sense. Now that would be some "self-improvement" but I give 100:1 odds you are incapable.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:17 PM
1

your comments exposes the truth, however unfortunate
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:11 PM
1

You are correct. This subforum is full of deselected men in denial.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:10 PM
2

He has to be an overt Feminist to have a career in the Liberal Arts in Academia. I've yet to see a single article in the Liberal Arts about men's or gender issues where the professor/researcher does not make a vocal Feminist conclusion. Female sexuality is the sacred cow.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:04 PM
4

Very good links. However, on the 3rd link by the author Rosenberg: "...the findings give credence to the feminist idea that some women feel stifled and oppressed by heterosexual marriage." He comes to the wrong conclusion - an anti-male Feminist talking point. Men want marriage and women don't want it. It's that simple. There is no stifling nor oppression.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:44 PM
3

I'm defending it because any objective person can clearly see there are people out there that hate women. How is this debatable? This is intellectually dishonest rhetoric. As is the rest of your post.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:05 PM
2

These type of replies are exactly why advocacy for men goes nowhere.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:26 PM
3

She admits herself it was random. If you don't know, then don't reply. The evidence is clear. She knows the issues and doesn't care. She can choose to do that, but those are the facts. Going on and on about how amazing she is - that's living in the past. Advocacy for men is dead if that continues.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:24 PM
2

It's gaslighting because there is no discrimination. There is no "choosing wrong" here tho.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:49 PM
-6

The "less or more pay when you consider the entire compensation package including benefits" is not the legal argument. It is the Title IX issue in the US and depends on how the women or men's unions can enforce negotiation standards. The women can try again and posturing that they aren't fast or strong or make benefits in addition to stipends is coping behavior from a men's rights point-of-view.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:10 PM
6

Men will submit to lack of human rights if they can throw another man under the bus thinking they will save themselves. If they can get praise from women even better. It's that simple. The specific rhetoric at any given time by male or female feminists is just a passing detail.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:57 PM
9

It is a bit random as to who gets the best opportunity to promote a cause. Which in this case it is her. She is 100 times more popular with YT views and is welcome on media interviews without being attacked (men are attacked even by so-called MRA's). She got fundraising to go on trips. Despite all of that, she knows how the situation is dire for men's rights, yet she got married, divorced and remarried. She just dropped it all. Can't be bothered. She's not obligated to do anything, but as the si…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:37 PM
4

Men don't organize to ban it when Feminists (male and female) deflect and cultural conservatives push religion and tradition. They fold.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:32 PM
-1

He's complaining that he paid more, that is all. Lots of poseurs on here coping that this is surprising.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:28 PM
15

Karen Straughan abandoned Men's Rights. She could've done so much but doesn't care.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:23 PM
1

The facts are neither good nor bad. Yet they are the only starting point that is helpful towards making a conscious choice.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:21 PM
1

A) this has nothing to do with mens rights (except that the underlying dynamics of a relationship lead to the abuses of mens rights) B) self-help on dating is complete nonsense. Women select for status and you can be polite or rude as long as she wants to be associated with your status and reap the benefits of you pandering to her. That's it. C) Not a single other respondent has pointed out the connection between dating and the worsening of men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 05:15 AM
1

I expect them to be better...more rational, more reasonable, more logical. Start with yourself. Not a single rational sequence from you yet. Just posturing that you "support" men's rights but trolling men abused by human rights violations.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 10:02 PM
2

You have no clue what a life "well-lived" is. Not if you believe in non-sense terms like "cock carousel" that older single women are "sad and alone". These terms are completely false. You are deluded and willing to live without rights.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 09:08 PM
3

Ah, now it all comes out, all the mgtow terminology proves that you self-loath yourself so much as a mgtow yourself that you admit you can't stop yourself from trolling. Enjoy your life with your neck under a Feminist boot.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 08:22 PM
4

The original channel is not dedicated to philosophy in any serious manner - it is sophism based on academic philosophy and in this case used to create anti-male propaganda and promote himself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/20 07:12 PM
5

Great find!
/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:35 PM
7

any link to that data? Regardless this is prioritizing women's lives anyway without a strict ethical basis.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter