TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Electronic-Ad-2852 Archive

View 0 posts and 114 comments by Electronic-Ad-2852 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Dude you are so insanely in your head on this, and you really just need to relax. Just fuck a hole or stroke your penis and you should cum. Sex is a lot more fun when its not also an anatomy lesson.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:44 PM
0

If you believe that you can't orgasm without a foreskin than you have a truly psychotic level of self delusion. Like I don't know why you hate your parents as much as you do, but the foreskin is apparently a coping mechanism.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:01 PM
-1

There is a reason "foreskin orgasm" is not a thing and "clitoral orgasm" is a thing. They are not comparable.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:09 PM
-15

Anybody with even a little sexual experience would know the foreskin is absolutely not comparable to the clitoris. The lack of sexual experience explains the insane amount of anger some are showing on this issue.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:51 PM
-15

So fixing "mutilated genitals" by literally mutilating your genitals. Ok I have now heard of everything. Someone needs to get these people help.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:48 PM
-5

Trolling is when someone interrupts your echo chamber? God forbid you hear a dissenting opinion.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:57 PM
-12

That seems far more plausible then a woman going through the painful court process purely out of spite.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:38 PM
1

restoration?
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:39 PM
-2

This should go to r/conspiracy
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:38 PM
-23

"falsely"
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:37 PM
-1

So to be clear you are not disagreeing that women have been marginalized for 99% of human history. Do you really think its going to all go away in one generation? The rhetoric of male victimhood here is laughable and does not help any actual male causes.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:24 PM
0

Instead of complaining about women advocating for other women, why don't you just advocate for the missing men? This is such a good example of why this sub is just anti woman and not about men's rights. I never see shit about actually advocating for workplace injury protections, or suicide among men, or military conscription. Its always just finding the dumbest feminist on twitter and dunking.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:57 PM
-3

You are not entitled to date or even be friends with anyone. You must earn their trust and respect. If you cannot do that then they will not enter into a relationship with you. Thats their decision to make.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:08 PM
-2

Probably not, but no one is going to take your movement seriously when you put out obviously fake or misleading numbers. You won't even defend the bogus numbers.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:03 PM
1

They should probably both lose their contracts. Staning for someone cause you think they are just less abusive than the other person is pretty weird.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:01 PM
0

Facts matter.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 12:57 PM
-9

Well that sounds like a lot. Its a lie. But it is a lot Correction: Sept. 24, 2012 An article on Aug. 27 about a conclusion by the American Academy of Pediatrics that the health benefits of circumcising infant boys outweigh the risks referred incompletely to complications that arise from the operation. An estimate given in the article, that about 117 boys a year die as a result of neonatal circumcision — put forth by Dan Bollinger, a prominent opponent of circumcision, based on his review of inf…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:19 PM
-5

Can you send a source for that? Seems impossible in developed nations.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:15 PM
-32

They were clearly abusive to each other and right now Johnny Deep is winning the PR battle despite being an abusive drug addict. Doesn't seem like the woman is really getting the benefit of the doubt here.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:08 PM
1

Just curious, but what happened for all of human history before 1982?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:21 PM
-16

Have you considered diet and exercise to make yourself more attractive to women?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:05 PM
0

I mean Jesus wear to start with this one. Just because you started a divorce does not mean you want it to happen. Think about domestic violence. This sort of "blame women" mentality really pervades this forum. It absolutely is still common in many parts of Pakistan, Afghanistan, rural Iran, and Eastern Syria. In the West some women choose to wear a Hijab, almost never the Niqab. If you dont know the difference, then maybe you shouldn't be talking about this.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 12:19 PM
0

Arguments around "personal choice" that women would spend more time raising kids reminds me of my time working in the Middle East. Its common to believe that women "chose" to wear the Niqab (total face covering) but that of course is not true. Even in the US, women give birth, and then we provide no means for men and women to take equal time off to care. So therefore women have become responsible for raising kids. Not a choice. Given the fact some divorces happen, etc... its a HUGE disadvantage …
/r/MensRights20/01/21 11:25 PM
0

Well i think we've explored how this number is incredibly misleading already so lets move on Ha, really don't want to talk about this do you? The number does not tell the whole story, but the 16% wage gap you quoted for your Europe is the total wage gap, not the controlled wage gap, so the valid counterfactual for that is the total wage gap of 27% in the US. Given the massive differences in paid family leave between the two, it seems like a high likelihood for a causal effect. What's the actual …
/r/MensRights19/01/21 08:44 PM
0

Well its 27% in the US, which has minimal maternal and paternal leave. One of the key take aways from the pandemic is that woman have had to take on a much greater burden of the increased family load then men. Female workforce participation rate has dropped dramatically. The load of family responsibilities continues to fall on them in ways that are not "personal choice". It will require a cultural shift in attitudes to overcome that.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 06:57 PM
0

Well pregnancy is by FAR the biggest factor. Because pregnancy is the primary cause, it makes sense that the best remedy is to increase paternal leave to be closer to maternal leave. This would encourage fathers to equally prioritize family time which would be good for fathers and help close the wage gap. Its widely seen as a win-win, but of course there is just so much pressure to not change the status quo.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 04:54 PM
1

I don't mean to say their analysis does not hold, but as an economist I cannot see where they have published anything. So there is no supporting data available and no peer review. Which of course is common coming from a consultant, and normal in that industry. From what I can tell they have done propensity score matching as opposed to an OLS regression with covariate controls for age, maternity, education, race, and gender which is the more common methodology.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 04:39 PM
1

https://www.henrikkleven.com/uploads/3/7/3/1/37310663/kleven-landais-sogaard_nber-w24219_jan2018.pdf Looking to page 44 you can see the earnings penalty for having a child, as of 2005 it looks to be 21 percentage points. Taken from the uncontrolled wage gap (.73) it means the gap is .94 or 6% in this study. Other studies will show slightly different numbers. I have never seen one to show it was completely closed.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 04:04 PM
3

Economist here, yes we do. The general consensus in the industry is that women earn 73% of men generally, but once controlling for other factors (primarily pregnancy) the gap drops to 93%. There is virtually no dissent on this actually. Now there are questions about whether 7% is significant enough to require policy change, but thats really a question for sociology not economics.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 03:15 PM
-1

Hold up, let me try to follow your logic. So, there is a Monopoly game where monocle guy is now a woman ipso facto we are about to exterminate all men? I mean this is satire right? If not you need to get help for you anger issues.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 03:00 PM
0

The Democratic Party has spent 30 years trying to make undocumented people to be citizens so that they cannot be exploited. It would raise the wages across all groups. Republicans have blocked that from happening since HW, but also since Trump tried we realize its impossible to remove 20 million immigrants. So it is Republicans who are creating a system of undocumented underpaid workers. And yes I agree that lowers the wages of citizens as well.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 02:43 PM
0

First, thats a gross misrepresentation of what that paper actually says. But, women can orgasm in two ways generally. Clitoral orgasms are FAR more common and easier to stimulate for the partner. Vaginal orgasms are possible for some but not all woman. So basically you make it MUCH harder but not impossible for a women to orgasm after FGM. The fact that many here do not seem to understand this basic concept of female gratification leads me to believe thats why you don't understand that male circ…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 09:15 PM
-1

I have no idea who has put the idea in your head that somehow getting a foreskin back is going to change your sex life. Even if you had your foreskin sex would be no more satisfying. But if you try to further mutilate your penis through "foreskin regeneration" you are actually risking doing real harm to your penis and perhaps become impotent. Your anger at being circumcised I think is misguided but at least understandable. But please please do not do this to yourself. You will regret it.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 09:00 PM
0

Your second point is valid, circumcision is pointless and should not be done, at least generally. But you're angry about perceived genital mutilation and your response is to further mutilate your genitals. You really don't see the irony? Circumcision is dumb, but reading through all these comments about the foreskin and sexual gratification its obvious the problem. The foreskin has nothing to do with having an orgasm, so if you are having trouble with that the solution is find better ways to hav…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 08:42 PM
-5

Rule #4: No compliments, if she is confident she does not need them Rule #5: If she won't do whatever you ask sexually shes probably a radical feminist
/r/MensRights18/12/20 05:58 PM
0

Oh wow, I read through this and I get it now. You guys are suffering from body dysmorphic disorder similar to anorexia. You are channeling your sexual frustration into believing the lack of the foreskin is the cause of your problems. Really you need to try masturbating and having sex (if you are having sex) differently. The procedures described here are far more invasive and more damaging than a circumcision ever could be. Its a great irony really.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 12:54 PM
1

It seems pretty obvious to me that if those in power represented a diverse range of genders, races, and income levels that we would have a society better represented and it would be MUCH harder to start a war. Right now our leadership is heavily skewed to rich white male folks. If poor white folks, POC, and women also had a seat at the table then it would be much harder to exploit them. However in this sub, and most subs frankly, there is huge push back to any affirmative policies for POC and wo…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 12:39 PM
-4

Well thats news to the 100 million or so circumcised American men having plenty of orgasms.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:16 PM
-2

People who claim the clitoris and the foreskin are the same must not have had sex. Women are not standing around the water cooler asking, "well did you work his foreskin?".
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:01 PM
-2

You clearly are not a parent. Parents have to make countless decisions about a child's life and the vast majority of them are FAR more important than whether or not a useless piece of skin was removed. You need to stop it with the self-victimization because you are just tormenting yourself.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:46 PM
-2

Thats an awful lot of words to say that basically not every FGM leads to a lack in the ability to orgasm, but very many do. Circumcision however never leads to that. Every link about how circumcision is designed to hurt male desire is from a Rabbi. How about medical studies? They will tell you it has no effect regardless of what any shaman may think.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:30 PM
-3

Ha, I had the same conversation here with someone. Basically they are trying to equate FGM with circumcision which is of course bogus because the purpose of FGM is to remove sexual pleasure and therefore oppress female sexuality. This is absolutely not true of circumcision so the alternative approach is to just lie about it. Which won't work obviously because there are about 100 million circumcised American men without ED, sooooo......
/r/MensRights17/12/20 07:58 PM
-1

What everyone on this sub does not realize is that what you are actually mad about is exploitive labor practices. For some reason you believe feminists are the problem when really its a ruling class that will send you to war or a dangerous job so long as it keeps the economy flowing.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 07:42 PM
-2

I am circumcised, I dont lubricate. I talk to a lot of guys about this stuff and I have never heard of anyone getting ED from a circumcision or even feeling the need to use lube. The problem is that you are just making up facts to try to equate FGM to circumcision. Typical of these safe space forums everyone is "done with you" as soon as their lies become obvious.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:11 PM
-4

What on earth are you talking about? I have been circumcised and never once lubricated before masturbating. I remember having a funny conversation in HS with a guy who was like, "masturbating is messy" and when I explained to him he didn't need to lubricate he was amazed. He literally thought it was necessary just from watching movies. There are a bunch of people on here claiming that because there are nerve endings in the foreskin that circumcision causes ED. This is a stupid argument, because …
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:49 PM
-2

Ummmm.... I don't know how to tell you this without embarrassing you, but the lubrication is usually for the women.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:33 PM
-5

What do you call it if it never served a purpose?
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:17 PM
-4

Every man who is circumcised can orgasm. Virtually no one with their clitoris removed can orgasm. They are completely different. You should be just as pissed about ear piercing.... excuse me... ear mutilation.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:01 PM
-2

Do you understand how many decisions a parent makes for child by the time they are 18? The courts will never rule the parents cannot make these decisions because it would be a legal nightmare. And you cannot outlaw circumcision entirely because it can be medically necessary. Like when the foreskin gets infected, which in fact does happen, and is the reason why the practice exists at all.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:46 PM
2

I dont think DJ Metcalf should be allowed to hit you.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 03:56 PM
-1

Let me get this straight. You are upset that a pointless medical procedure was conducted on without your consent. So, you want to then try an experimental surgery that is undoubtedly far more dangerous and also pointless? Dude you need to see a therapist if its bothering you that much.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 03:40 PM
-10

This attitude is exactly why this sub is so toxic. Male circumcision is a pointless process. But if you are going to feel victimized because you lost a piece of vestigial skin the size of my thumbnail then you are guaranteed to go through life unhappy.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 03:22 PM
-13

Please list all of the cultures throughout history in which women controlled the majority of power? No one, ever, will give up power even if it means risk. Men dying in war is the result of men controlling power. All arguments around "men's rights" are the problems that come along with power. Men have the jobs, so men have more workplace injuries. Men have power and men fight in wars. I read all the posts on here complaining like children about women having it "easy". Right now you are witnessin…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:58 PM
-21

Creating your own language like "simp" for in and out groups is a sure fire sign you are in a cult devoid of reason. I am here to try to talk sense into men who despite all world history proving otherwise, believe that they are in fact a marginalized group. Its an attitude that will destroy your life if you don't take a step back and try to see this through the eyes of people who actually have been oppressed throughout our history.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:20 PM
-52

OK lets not be hypocritical. If we fine Paris for too many women then we can fine all of the governments for too many men, no? It appears that no one realizes I am calling out hypocrisy here, and not actually insisting that all the US governors step down.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:58 PM
-47

Complaining about affirmative hiring practices for women while simultaneously complaining about men paying more in income taxes is circular logic. You are complaining about a system you are perpetuating.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:23 PM
-169

The US should fine all companies with a board of directors with more than 60% men. Governor's with majority male appointed staff should resign as well. edit: I see people suck at sarcasm. This is in response to "rules for thee and not for me". If this fine occurs then every male dominated council in France can also be fined, which I am sure if every single one outside of Paris. So be careful what you wish for.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:00 PM
0

Its 48 upvotes for calling an entire country, "cucked". Thats this sub in a nutshell right there. I wonder what they would say if the US federal government were fined for having too many men in Congress. Probably a very different reaction.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:44 PM
4

Dude fuck off with your fake troll feminist comments. Anybody can look through your comment history and tell you are trying to make a feminist argument, but intentionally in the worst possible way. If you are going to be troll you need to hide your tracks better.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:41 PM
1

Okayyyyyy.... well you were trying to discount feminism because more men die of homicides. Seems like that fact that its almost entirely men killing men is relevant to that fact. But I am glad you are against the baddies. Someone has to take a hard stance against bad people.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:50 PM
0

And who kills those men? 90%+ of the time its other men. Who rapes those women? 90%+ of the time its men. I see a lot complaining from men here about how women use sex to their advantage. This is completely false. Women are scared of violence from men and therefore keep men at arms length especially when drugs or alcohol are involved. You would find that if men actually cared to stop rape then women would over time become more comfortable, and it would be easier to have relationships with women.…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:18 PM
1

Which hasn't been used in 40 years and Jimmy Carter pardoned everyone who did not obey the draft. So you would have to go back to WWII to find a case where that actually happened.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:33 PM
-2

Feminists - we would like men to stop raping us. Men's Rights - Waahhhh I have to pay for drinks! r/MensRights - These two things are are clearly just as bad
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:03 PM
1

I mean I don't disagree with the points that it will take a long time to correct due to career length, and that we would not want to fire anybody already in a tenured position. All that being said the policy generally is completely valid, and the arguments in this video are misleading at best.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:16 PM
1

I just explained very thoroughly why the two things are in fact very much different. You have provided no evidence to show otherwise. It would be like calling simple assault and murder the same thing, because "this isn't the violence Olympics guys mkay?". And saying that I "make men afraid to talk about their problems" while simultaneously talking about the problem with me is pretty funny.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:50 PM
0

This guy even admits that it did for men for 90% of our history. So now that men have entrenched power that will continue in perpetuity unless do something to reverse it. Its as if someone cheated for the first three quarters of a football game, got caught and then instead of having a penalty were just like, "no harm no foul guys, PLAY ON!" and just kept their 5 touchdown lead.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:35 PM
1

First, there is no way in 7 years we went from 15% tenured professors as women to 50%, didnt happen. If you really believe otherwise then point to evidence as I did. Second, its a peer reviewed study versus a guy on a podcast. He can say whatever he wants on a podcast but peer reviewed study have stringent guidelines. This is in effect the major problem of our time. We take people on instragram or reddit at their word and dispute the word of experts who are actually held to account.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:15 PM
0

One is designed to systemically oppress an entire gender, while the other is just a misguided practice. Calling circumcision MGM is like calling ear piercing ear mutilation. Especially considering a large number of women have their ear's pierced at a young age at the encouragement of their parents.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:57 PM
-3

Well its semantics are far as what you what to call it. I am just making the point that one is far worse than the other. Circumcision though is quite pointless which as a medical procedure would make it unethical as well.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 06:24 PM
-6

Male circumcision cannot be compared to FGM because the purpose of removing the clitoris is clearly to remove sexual gratification which is a way of undermining female sexuality. Male circumcision is basically a pointless procedure but it does not oppress men. Basically I think it still exists today because people believe it is more "clean", which is dumb but not oppression.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:43 PM
1

I am sure there are some good people in your life. I hope you spend time with them and remove toxic people from your life. May you find peace.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:26 PM
-7

Hes literally lying. Men outnumber women by a huge margin in professorships (at least in the US). The bias becomes larger when looking at minority women and larger still when looking at tenured professors. There is a link at the bottom here. He starts off talking about hiring practices (professors) and then gives data on attendance (students). Its intentionally misleading. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/08/22/study-finds-gains-faculty-diversity-not-tenure-track
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:11 PM
0

If there was an epidemic of violence against men by women then this would be perhaps valid. As the original posts points out there are no battered men's shelters, just the opposite. Your advocating for more violence against women when there is already an epidemic of violence against women. Frankly you are taking this so far I am beginning to wonder if you are actually a radical feminist trying to troll this forum.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 04:53 PM
0

You sound very angry about this situation. I would suggest you think more about why you cannot just remove yourself from the situation. If someone attacks you they are in the wrong. Do not provoke the situation by adding to the violence. Thats what maturity is about.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 04:37 PM
0

I can't believe I actually have to spell out an argument on why you should not hit women, ever, but here we are a I guess. In virtually every situation the man is larger and more powerful and probably more aggressive then the women. It represents an escalation of violence against a person who may feel defenseless. If you escalate a situation you are now at fault as well. If you escalate a situation against a person so much smaller then you as to feel like its life threatening then you are at fau…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 02:01 PM
0

This link? https://np.reddit.com/r/depression/comments/k79wsn/i_got_raped_for_3_years_in_a_row_and_i_dont_think/ All of the comments are there.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 05:00 PM
-6

You can still read it, and you are discussing it here. The oppression is in your mind.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:22 PM
6

If a woman hits you, you should walk away. Probably for good.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:59 PM
-3

I don't understand this post. It says "Reddit: Remove Post!" and then there is a link to the actual post that is most definitely not removed and includes 204 comments pretty much all of which are highly supportive of this individual.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:42 PM
1

There are a lot of people on here who find the 10% craziest feminists and let their anger towards them enrage them. Just ignore the crazies and remove toxic people from your life. Its not that hard, most people just want equality.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 10:15 PM
0

"Feminism should just be called women’s rights because it doesn’t advocate for equality in the first place." Are you advocating that this subreddit is not interested in equality as well since its called men's rights and no masculism or similar? "Also if you look through this sub, there’s like 8 posts about a woman raping a 14 year old but she got away with it" I didn't comment on those. Another straw man of my argument, go figure. "Also we don’t know the full situation we’re just assuming that h…
/r/MensRights07/12/20 09:53 PM
-4

My criticism about this thread (and many like it) is that its a straw man, and you respond with a straw man of my argument. As for me personally seeing it happen, obviously thats not what I am arguing. What I am saying is it does not pass the smell test. No one has ever insisted there is an epidemic of nut-kicking, its preposterous. To the other point, for an issue to be "men's rights" or "women's rights" or any groups rights it needs to be systemic by definition. Otherwise its just some dudes r…
/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:17 PM
-9

In order for there to be systemic oppression, there has to be a systemic problem. There is no crisis of nut kicking going on right now. Also there is definitely zero data on this, but from my experience I have probably seen dozens of guys kick other guys in the nuts. I am pretty sure I have never seen a girl kick a guy in the nuts.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 06:51 PM
-1

Ive said it before but this really should be changed to r/strawmansrights. The actual post is about a guy who called the police on his wife for presumably being mean then everyone piles on with, "oh but I heard somewhere something worse happened....". I feel like I am at the Festivus pole with George's Dad listening to the "airing of the grievances"
/r/MensRights07/12/20 06:15 PM
0

He called the police because his wife insulted him. What the hell are the police supposed to do? Arrest her for being mean? If you don't like your wife get a divorce.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:54 PM
-16

This forum needs to be changed to r/strawmansrights because this post is seriously talking about nut-busting oppression as if this is a serious issue for anyone.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:39 PM
0

Victim blaming? Let me tell you something that you desperately need to hear. You are not a victim for being a man. Society does treat men and women differently in some regards, but if you are trying to play the victim its going to fail. Both personally and as a movement.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 02:11 PM
0

Looking back at my comments I refer to feminists as "toxic" at least 3 times. So please reference which comments are "drinking the feminist kool aid". Its difficult to have a conversation with someone that makes this up.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 03:24 PM
-2

No this forum is just as toxic as radical feminists. Both start from reasonable observations of how men or women have certain benefits. However in both cases they blame the other sex for ALL of their problems. Lets look at what I think is a completely valid men's rights issue, work place injuries and fatalities. Who are the managers and company leaders above these men putting them in that situation? Its men not women. The same could be said for beauty standards for women. Women spend hugely disp…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 03:09 PM
0

Society deals with men and women differently in so many ways. If you tried to empathize with women you would find both faults and benefits to traditionally masculine and feminine standards. You can learn from that or be angry about that. Those in this subreddit have chosen anger which is always a downward spiral.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 02:54 PM
-4

I think you are listening to bad advice. You do not need to spend an unhealthy amount of time at the gym. But taking the time to find clothes that fit your body type, getting a good haircut, etc... will pay dividends in the dating game. Women have known this for a long time, and its becoming increasingly important in our society for men as well. If you want a good job or to marry a good person you are going to have to take time to become educated and appear put together. That goes for men and wo…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 07:59 PM
0

I can only speak from personal experience, but with every promotion I receive I get more money to frankly do less work. Power is not sacrifice generally. Yes there is burden as well, but frankly if power wasn't worth it then everyone in power would quit. They don't though. Women I can assure you don't see it as having a choice. They have fewer opportunities at high paying jobs which can be seen obviously from the huge disproportion of men in executive positions. AND, they have to leave the workf…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 07:42 PM
-5

You just cut out the part where I said "these are generalizations that generally hold" and then found niche examples. Also most of your examples don't hold water anyway. More women die in child birth then men in work place injuries. Men do more time and are more often murdered but also commit more crimes and murders. There are no doubt some men who face obstacles, however when you look at society generally you will see men have entrenched power in Western Society at least that gives them enormou…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 07:22 PM
0

Its not just about famous people. There is a very strong correlation between height in men and income. Height as it turns out is a critical aspect of how both men and women view male attractiveness. It almost surely holds for how men dress, haircuts, etc... but obviously thats a harder study to process because of the subjective nature of those traits.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 06:41 PM
-9

Men earn more than women, even when correcting for things like child birth and education levels. So the idea that men earn less except CEOs is just not true. It is true a small subset of college educated younger women earn more than men, but when correcting for that education level the benefit goes away. Your anger towards women would be better directed at telling men to focus on school. The exact same is true of your argument around "social desirability". Men also benefit from perceived attract…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 06:21 PM
-3

I agree that there is obviously far more at play here than just sex. But, when you look at men representing 48% of people and 80% of power (I know thats very general) its a strong effect. The other fallacy here is that men can't use their sex appeal for money. The set of criteria for what constitutes an "attractive" female or male are different, but in both cases "attractiveness" and income have a huge correlation. I am speaking far more broadly then just porn or Only Fans.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 05:30 PM
1

Mainstream feminist views are saying that sexual assault is wrong and misogynistic because you are using someone for sex without their consent. Men and women have the right to use their bodies including for profit, but thats consensual. Its like saying that paying someone to do manual labor is the same as slavery. One is an agreement and one is an assault.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 05:13 PM
-17

Men control 80% of congress and executive corporate positions, but you think women have privilege? They are selling sex on Onlyfans because they cant get a six figure corporate job. I understand this is a generalization, but one that holds strongly.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 04:57 PM
0

Black people have been systematically discriminated against for our entire history. No crime is justified and I said that clearly but as usual you are building a straw man around my argument. But, when its 2020 and black people have FAR less money, access to education, etc... then of course a disproportionate number of them will turn to crime. That does not make that right or justifiable, but obviously that is going to be the case. You can call something wrong, but still understand why it exists…
/r/MensRights03/12/20 05:00 PM
-1

With very few exceptions men have a hugely disproportionate control of all levels of power. Men as a class of people are not the victim. And you can talk about racism that Irish experienced if you like, but that has nothing to do with "mens rights".
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:38 PM
1

There is so much male self victimization here. Then as soon as someone punches holes in your arguments you refuse to even debate on any substance. Men who are vastly over represented in all levels of power in the US and frankly most of the world are going to convince no one they are someone a victim. You can go on blaming your problems on feminists or just deal with your own problems.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:18 PM
2

This sounds like projection. We don't know because OP didnt show her response. Pretty easy to win an argument if you just don't listen to the response.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:03 PM
-1

African Americans were enslaved, lynched, and had no voting rights for much of our history. White men held power for all of history. So while the actions of black criminals are wrong they are understandable in our historical context. White men who commit frankly terrorist acts like shooting a school have no justification at least as a class of people. Also we don't know that she "looses (sic) all her brain cells" because OP cuts off her response. Epic takedown bra.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 03:47 PM
-1

So you acknowledge playing the victim is wrong, and then hold up a movement you hate as a reason why you will continue play the victim? Look, no one is ever going to feel sorry for straight white men, because straight white men held on to power for pretty much all of American and frankly world history. So pulling the victim card as a straight white male is going to get you laughed at. That can make you mad if you want, but you are going to get no one on your side and laughed at a lot.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 03:32 PM
1

I am a socialist? Well that is news to me. And I only refer to men's advocates as toxic? I literally used the phase "toxic feminists", Can I make it more clear for you? There are actually men out there that don't hate women and women who dont hate men. Stop looking to blame your problems on an entire class or sex of people and your life will improve.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 03:06 PM
0

Oh no my precious upvotes! This whole subreddit is men who blame all their problems on women who blame all of their problems on men. Its hilariously lacking in self-awareness.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 01:04 PM
0

You're so, so close to understanding... Toxic feminists and toxic "mens rights" advocates are both shitty people who blame other people for their personal problems.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:30 PM
-10

Did you already forget what you just said? ” because many of them are bullshit liars like this one. " Stop making blanket statements about men or women. This whole thread is trying to create sympathy for a guy who 50/50 is guilty.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:40 PM
-6

Someone needs to give you a dose of reality. Work on being a decent person to be around and have self respect enough to not allow toxic people in your life and you will realize you are not a walking wallet. Its a self fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:25 PM
-13

Men with money, but toxic personalities usually say this sort of crap. If you were pleasant person you might find people want you for reasons other than money.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:14 PM
-9

This is the kind of thing someone who has paid for a lot of hookers would say.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:12 PM
2

Men are the prize? A person is a prize, not one entire half of the human race. You really can't see how you are just as bad as radical feminists.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:09 PM
-8

There is absolutely nothing in this story that corroborates either side of this story. Why do you believe all men? Pot calling the kettle black.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:07 PM
-9

This story is a complete he said she said and its every bit as likely that her story is true. The fact that you immediately take his side without evidence shows you are a chauvinist. Maybe hes right, but neither you or I know that and yet this is written as if obviously she is lying. And this can't happen to any one of us. It happens to people who surround themselves with bad people. Quit being a victim.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter