TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Electronic-Cherry266 Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by Electronic-Cherry266 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Dude, no women are saying that there is an issue with VIRGINS.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:57 PM
1

That's not what she said.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:49 PM
2

Thank you for explaining this. I don't know how people don't understand the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:48 PM
1

Oh, and they're not "laughing right along with them" in the sense of them laughing at the same things. Men and women who are both laughing at.men and calling them incels are usually doing so for very different reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:46 PM
1

Lmao, women aren't laughing at or about "incels" because they don't have sex. Are you joking or are.you serious? Although the term incel first came from women who were involuntarily celibate, then men startedcusing this term to descrive themselves. Now we see every redpiller talking about so-called "alphas," and "betas," and "incels," and to them, calling men betas and incels is always an insult. Women don't care about whether some guy has had sex or not, or regularly has sex or not. If she's us…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:44 PM
1

Ugh, I know right? Mine is still zero, but if I get sick enough of people using such a crass, derogatory term, I guess there's a chance it could go up. 😂 /s (for the record)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:35 PM
1

STDs, does he treat women well . . . If I'm dating someone, I don't really think about it (or I'm not necessarily going to ask about it), but if I find out a guy has a lot of casual sex (depending on the context), I admit I am a but more hesitant. If a guy has a bunch of casual sex, I question whether they even give a shit about the women and might actually just be an asshole and I didn't realize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:32 PM
1

Lol, but it doesn't mean he wasn't CONFIDENT. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:20 PM
–

1) This post is about hurting other people, women specifically, so yes, it does affect me because arguing in support of hurting women IS about women. Duh. 2) If you want me to buy that this is actually about a man hating himself and wanting feedback or to talk to people, he would have to say that instead of justifying rape and manipulation. Check yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:55 PM
6

"Rated PG-13" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:14 PM
0

Posts like this are heartbreaking. Every. Single. Time. I want nothing more to have an amazing relationship with a man (yes, I know, silly me). Instead, as painful as it is to read these posts, I make sure to read them, so I don't forget how men really feel about us.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 03:19 AM
–

First of all, those don't make you more attractive. 😂 Second of all, you intentionally ignored the major surgery you used as an example to respond to that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 02:17 AM
1

And my purpose in distinguishing reverse-misogyny from misandry is to recognize what is actually going on and where it came from so that it can actually be changed. It's hard to change something when it's so misunderstood.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:30 PM
1

Reverse-misogyny is a better term (like reverse-racism) than misandry, since it exists in response to misogyny. And I'm not sure why there are so many men STILL arguing about testosterone equaling aggression, since we know that's not quite how it works. Of course, I'm not assuming the average person is going to be aware of that because most people are ignorant about most things, but I AM surprised when it gets argued in subs like this. Makes it just sound like redpill subs that are usually all f…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:28 PM
1

Oh, I agree with that, too! I just appreciated that because it was such a change from what has been typical for so long in media. I wasn't saying that I specifically want more GoT-like nudity, just that I appreciated that it was sort of used as a great equalizer compared to how nudity is usually used. That was why I thought of it. One question. We're you just wanting to share that you don't like Game of Thrones, or was your response about it being "insufferable" related to my comment specificall…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 07:29 PM
1

Lol, they're definitely on that path. They won't be our problem anymore. Do you think they's switch to terrorizing gay men, straight men, or just each other because they're all the tip toppiest tier and no one else is good enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 05:26 PM
2

That's very true. Ignoring manipulative behavior is being complicit. And yeah, if you could just simply "not choose" to be manipulated......I'm not sure if I should be offended, or maybe flattered because these men think women are all so brilliant and psychic, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 05:22 PM
5

I'm confused about how this relates to the previous comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:11 AM
1

And the ones they do show are prosthetics anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:08 AM
1

I agree about the penises. I liked that about Game of Thrones (the nudity in general) because everyone was naked and none of it was pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:08 AM
–

Wait, what? How can we look them up by titles OR authors if you don't give us any info about where you got the "daya" from. What you don't seem to be getting is that, if you've already looked them up, then if you look them up again, you'll find them more quickly than if we searched for some study that says some keyword you claimed they argued. We would just be sifting through random articles to try and guess if we found the same things you are referencing. Or, maybe I just didn't understand your…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 08:31 PM
–

Also, you need significantly more data because your conclusions aren't holding up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 08:25 PM
0

I still disagree. Many women do like men, and most of the ones who don't, don't BECAUSE of how they've been treated by men. I understand that attraction can play a role and add to how much someone likes someone overall, but I really think you're severely overestimating how much men like women, AND underestimating how many women are attracted to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 08:24 PM
–

Well, I'll have to check them out. It would be helpful if you'd add them to your post, since multiple people have been asking about your sources. Thanks for sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 08:17 PM
–

I mean, what is your definition of desire, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:12 PM
–

Sounds like every redpill dude rating women by attractiveness. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:10 PM
–

This is one of those guys who's too dumb to understand how he could possibly be misunderstanding his owm arguments, much less the supposed evidence he can't be bothered to share.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:09 PM
0

Many men don't even LIKE women. They're just sexually attracted to them. How can you say that women aren't into men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:07 PM
–

But your opinion was so wrong, though. 😂😂😂 You don't even have anything to back up that statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:04 PM
–

He refuses. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:03 PM
–

The burden of proof is on YOU if you are making the claims, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:02 PM
1

Heal how? I'm so curious now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:49 PM
1

I don't necessarily think so because if someone has never been pregnant before, they can't know what it is like to be in that situation. Sort of like how people think they know how they'd handle being attacked, or what they'd do if they won the lottery -- but you might not actually know until you're in that situation. Pregnancy is a HUGE deal and involves her body no matter what (whether it be carrying to term or having a medical procedure). I think it's hard to require that or to enforce such a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 03:52 AM
2

I thought the shot was causing SERIOUS issues, like seizures or death or something. I don't actually remember what it was (and I'll go look it up). Are you sure that was the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 03:01 AM
1

Yes, absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 02:57 AM
1

I think you're assuming that the men who justify manipulating others this way have some sort of capacity for empathy to begin with. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 08:13 AM
1

This is an excellent post and explanation. The part that stood out to me the most was that if a relationship is the cost of sex, then you don't want a relationship. So simple, so obvious, so straightforward. I'm sorry you're getting so many brain dead comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:57 PM
1

First of all, it doesm'tvmatyer whether you were talking about strippers -- her point was that the prostitutes she spoke with didn't have the same point of view you assumed they would. Her mentioning being a former stripper is for context, that she might actually know more women personally and have better evidence than you do. Second of all, it's inappropriate and disgusting to call her a whore and throw around random insults (that don't even make sense). I'm reporting you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:20 AM
–

The fact that they would never consent without money doesn't necessarily mean they dislike the guy. There are TONS of reasons to not consent without money.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:15 AM
1

Okay, I found it again. Lol. And reading the post again, I remember that the way it was worded was really confusing to me, so idk if I even understand what he's trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:10 AM
–

Was he talking about casual sex, though? I promise I'll go read his post again, but I was afraid I'd lose my place, where I was reading. 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:08 AM
–

And provide for HER emotionally so she naturally wants to have sex with you. If she's resistant to having sex with you, ask why.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:06 AM
1

You don't need enthusiastic consent to have emotions during sex. You can have a fuck ton without it. (Yes, I know that you were talking about positive emotions.)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:04 AM
2

She wasn't defending that it's okay. She was saying that you probably just.don't know what is "normal" for most men, because you're not the woman in those situations, one-on-one. As far as first-hand knowledge goes, you only have your own in those situations. And none of us women believe it SHOULD be normal, just that it is very common.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:02 AM
–

As a woman, it is very normal in hookups. I honestly think it's a rare woman who genuinely likes hookups and benefits from them. This is why I'm anti-hookup culture. It's all about the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:00 AM
–

Ooh, I definitely agree with the "mutual desire maybe, but mutual pleasure no" part.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 11:58 PM
–

As a woman, I strongly disagree with that. Maybe it's a cultural difference, but I feel like I hear similar things from women all over. Hookups are very different and men don't necessarily have desire for their hookups, anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 11:57 PM
–

This! Why is this guy so surprised when males also try to drive it home, over and over, that they don't care about us, don't even like us, that they'll fuck anything that walks, that if they have casual sex with you it's because they aren't interested in you, they don't even care if you get off because that's not their job and not what they're there for, that sex means nothing to them -- they just want to "have fun" or let off a little steam, cheating doesn't mean anything, etc. I tried to be ni…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 11:54 PM
–

"Our sex" does NOT struggle with the concept that sex CAN BE the deepest, most intimate connection. I think most of us feel that way ourselves, as well. This is the society we live in, so we are brought up to feel that way. It's totally normal and common across the board. We have spheres of levels of intimacy -- acquaintances, friends, family, romantic partners, et cetera. Most people figure that you will (could/should/whatever) have the deepest, rawest, most vulnerable connection with your part…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 11:50 PM
–

I might not understand the complaint, because you just described two things that don't seem opposing at all -- they sound like they go hand in hand. I think it makes perfect sense that those people would complain about men only wanting sex, because the point is that those men aren't often providing any emotional connection for their partners. Men who only care about sex aren't usually looking for an emotional connection, they're looking for a sex toy. A woman is not a sex toy. She is not a flesh…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 11:13 PM
1

Okay, that's enough. Do you have the capacity to have a real debate? So far it just sounds like you're trolling or something. Do you have anything of SUBSTANCE to add?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:48 PM
1

People who see relationships transactionally don't do anything without incentive. It sounds like you're assuming other people function the way you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:44 PM
1

Your comment was, in and of itself, a deflection, which means it doesn't make sense for her to have to answer it rather than staying on topic and redirecting back to the topic if someone's "tactic" is, basically, a whataboutism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:42 PM
1

But the redpill is mostly wrong, so that doesn't really make sense. 😂 Okay, but for real, I would be really curious to hear your specific issues with the blue pill. I haven't actually listened to as much blue pill stuff as red pill stuff and I'd love to know what, specifically, you take issue with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:31 PM
1

What is AMALT?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:31 PM
1

I'm not quite sure how your comment relates to the comment you commented on....but the fact that you called being a good person a "feminist ally bit" says more about you than anyone else. He wasn't talking about anyone doing a bit or pretending to be an ally. He was talking about guys who are actually willing to work on themselves, learn other people's perspectives and not be so self-centered. You also said that blue pillers "refuse to tell the truth," suggesting you don't think blue pill rhetor…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:28 PM
2

Can you elaborate on what a good guy is in your view?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:21 PM
1

Is this a debate thread? I thought it was. If that's the case, isn't a jab at the debater rather the argument considered a poor response? Or is this just a regular thread. I've been trying to frame my comments a certain way because I thought I was supposed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:18 PM
-1

Of course they do. They preach manipulation and abuse tactics to get what they want out of a relationship, no matter the harm they cause to women. They act immorally, but try to pretend like it's amoral. If you want to argue that it's amoral because morals are "man"-made, okay, but we also have plenty of scientific evidence for the harm it causes women, and women aren't going to tolerate the mistreatment anymore. If they are arguing amorality, eventually they will have to come to terms with the …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:16 PM
1

What makes you think this is either/or scenario? That's not how people work. You can have standards in both of those areas and you, like them, have the ability to choose what you be, as well. These things aren't trade-offs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:05 PM
1

I find it interesting that you say you can look "beyond the superficial stuff and decide whether someone is an asshole or not" but also claim that the "liberal white woman" in your example " 'refuses' to be friends with anyone but other liberal white women", which IS a superficial examination. Unless you were referring to a specific person and not claiming that liberal white women who have other white liberal friends are necessarily more racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:59 PM
2

"A woman can just listen to what a man says to understand how men work. But men are forced to ignore what women say, and to purely observe what they DO." I have two issues with this: 1) This assumes that MEN know how men work. Many men have issues with alexithymia, that indicates that they don't know themselves as well as they think they do. They lack emotional depth, and the ability to regulate their emotions well. Because women tend to be more in touch with their emotions, they have better emo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:50 PM
2

Basically, "the man is simply doing what women respond to" is just a cop out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:26 PM
0

That is exactly WHY it is predatory, though. They acknowledge that they are trying to manipulate her. They aren't just saying that they knowingly enter into a relationship because she is insecure or has unhealthy attachment issues, they are TEACHING men how to exploit that, how to worsen it, until she doesn't know any better. That is abusive. They are using abuse tactics to train her into dysfunction. I'm not dismissing that they can meet a woman who is already insecure, etc, who is attracted to…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:25 PM
–

1) how did she move the goalpost? 2) Are using whataboutisms any better?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 07:00 PM
1

Are you using that argument to justify why you think it's okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:53 PM
1

He's misusing the data.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 04:45 PM
1

Feminism is about bring us together, not creating greater separation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:16 PM
1

Ffs?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:15 PM
0

I'm not sure what influencers you watch, but the ones I have seen who seem to be more on the misandrist side aren't really engaging with men. Why would they? That doesn't make sense. Maybe you have some examples. The feminists I watch online aren't spouting "anti-man" rhetoric, and some of them do engage in casual sex, which makes more sense, because they do genuinely like men. You say "promiscuous." I say "sex-positive." It sounds like you engage in "anti-woman rhetoric," which skews your persp…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:08 PM
1

Sorry not to address any of the individual points, but this was already such a long response.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:12 AM
5

I just wrote a long-ass comment...but I should have just read further. Haha, yours is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:11 AM
1

I don't know what graph you're referring to, but I wouldn't be surprised if it looked that way, even though I think it's likely misrepresented. If the gender roles and ideologies of the patriarchy are considered the norm, then a deviation from that could be considered radicalization, which could include all feminism. The problem with that is that gender INEQUALITY is considered the baseline, or middle point (I think of it as a balance point). Because this paradigm is male-centered, it is mostly …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:08 AM
2

That doesn't necessarily mean they're lying. They might just be misunderstanding what demisexuality is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter