TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Elee3112 Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by Elee3112 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

It is a part of the discussion because you are under the delusional notion that fathers get 50-50 joint custody when that couldn't be further from the truth. Too lazy to actually check, but I'm almost certain I have never in any of my posts to you mentioned 50-50 custody. Just so we're clear, joint custody is not necessarily 50-50 custody; Aside from 50-50 custody and full custody, there are other options. The problem is that hiring a baby-sitter is a conscious, consensual choice on both parties…
/r/MGTOW06/06/17 11:14 AM
0

But most men have to even if the mother has sole-custody? In fact, they have to pay even more with maternal sole-custody than if there was some form of joint-custody. I can safely assume that the mother has the primary custody of the child if she's buying designer boots and based off of national parameters already. I still don't care about this. Not part of the discussion on part-custody. As stated earlier, this is totally dependent on what the terms of the agreement are precisely. If it's joint…
/r/MGTOW05/06/17 12:22 PM
1

You're right to come see me Logan, I AM indeed Charles Xavier. But alas, my mutant powers have not yet manifested. Until it does, I'm afraid you'll just have to treat me as someone incapable of mind reading. The point of this discussion is if the father doesn't have any custody rights, then yes, I agree with you, there is no reason why he should pay anything. That however, is not stated anywhere in the origins Facebook screenshot. On the other hand, if the father does have some custody rights, t…
/r/MGTOW05/06/17 12:53 AM
1

Oh you sure showed me! Congratulations! You have won an oar! It'll help you with your future back-paddling needs! I'm sure it'll look pretty next to your edited comment. You know, the one that says if the father didn't have limited custody? As a side note, you DO realise people can see if a comment was edited, right?
/r/MGTOW05/06/17 12:17 AM
2

90%?! Holy crap that's high! Also, holy crap! That's REALLY irrelevant in a discussion about how you figured the father didn't have limited custody! Here you go. It's 42% in 2008. And it was on a downward trend. You have a pretty high chance of being wrong. https://psychcentral.com/news/2014/05/22/joint-custody-becoming-the-norm/70199.html I see you ignored my question though, so here it is again: if the mother can't afford raising the kid, and the father doesn't want custody, what then? Does th…
/r/MGTOW04/06/17 10:48 PM
1

First off... where does it even say the father doesn't have limited custodial rights? Secondly, if one partner can't afford to provide for the child, the other does not want primary custody, or, if both can't afford it single-handedly, what do you propose? Is it off to the the giant blender for the kid? Is it the state-enforced adoption? Or is it "Screw you and what you want, you're looking after this kid now"?
/r/MGTOW04/06/17 01:54 AM
1

She specifically stated that she spent funds OWED to her for child support to pamper herself. Huge difference. If I'm supposed to get say... $100 a month for my child, let's say for simplicity all of this money is intended for food, but my partner have not paid me for the past 12 months. What do you think must happen? Option A: pay for baby food out of my own pocket, foregoing non necessities if required. Option B: not buy the baby any food, continuing spending my money on myself. Not my problem…
/r/MGTOW03/06/17 05:04 AM
-7

Hurray! You assaulted someone! You're so awesome!! Oh wait I'm in MGTOW... guess I better point out that was sarcasm.
/r/MGTOW18/05/17 10:18 PM
23

It's a bit of a balancing act though isn't it? From what I know, part of the reason some crimes have very harsh punishment is to deter people offending. While I can understand why you wouldn't want to scare off anyone from confessing to a crime already committed, you also don't want to send a message that says "Hey, go ahead! Do this! You have nothing to fear!" Granted, paying $90k is nothing to sneeze at, I personally think the punishment is still a little on the light side.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:35 AM
1

There's really no argument at all. We both agreed you said condoms are the least effective form of contraceptive available. I pointed out spermicide is less effective, therefore making your "100% factual statement" incorrect. You're welcome to assume we were having an argument, I'm just here teaching you primary school maths. Edit: even your point on condoms being the only available option for male birth control is not correct. There's the pull out method, the snip snip option, and there's resea…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:33 AM
1

Poor word choice on my part. I'll give you that much. The main point of my post was your "100% factual statement" is incorrect. 98% is significantly higher than 73%. Back in my high school, we had sex education, and one of the first thing they taught is no single method is 100% effective, it's in your interest to combine different methods. (Not sure where does the snip fit in though, seems pretty effective)
/r/MensRights13/04/17 02:01 AM
1

Is it "paying child support" awful? "Unplanned pregnancy" awful? Or just "minor inconvenience" awful?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 12:40 AM
4

Effective rate of condom: 98% Effective rate if spermicide: 73% But whatever, let's keep pretending condoms don't work.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 09:14 PM
1

We put Trump in the White House...do you really think I am sitting around caring what people think of us? We won. You might not care, but I sure as hell hope some others in this sub does. Also, if you're making a whole community look bad, you probably should care a bit more. Well if this behavior is normal for them and they genuinely made a mistake...I might understand why they are not guilty knowingly committing a crime. You might understand why they're not guilty, but you will still come out o…
/r/MensRights10/02/17 01:56 PM
2

I think posts like yours actually give this sub, and MRM in general, a bad reputation. 2) according to him, he didn't think of what he was doing as rape at the time. I.e. HE is the one denying he knowingly raped her. In most jurisdictions there is a mental element to rape. Hypothetically speaking, if a foreigner visits your country, sees a female you're close to in a bikini, which in his country is pretty much the equivalent of screaming "Please have sex with me", you'll be completely okay with …
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:58 AM
-1

You guys are aware anyone and everyone paying tax is probably "being forced" to pay for stuff they don't benefit from, or agree with, right..? Don't try to spin it into a gender issue.
/r/MGTOW03/02/17 03:08 AM
3

But if the price difference is based on gender wage gap, wouldn't that mean I can complain about having to pay more for my cocktail that someone who's buying a lemonade..?
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:44 AM
6

Just to be upfront, I'm no legal expert, and even if I am, I can only make speculations based on what was written on the article. Now that we have that out of the way, to be honest, if we remove the age thing, I personally don't think it is rape in this case, somewhere in the article, it mentions the boy is "fond" of her. Now, somewhere in the US legal system, I would imagine there's a law against grooming minors for sex, but I would also imagine the definition of minor is also given an arbitrar…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 09:10 PM
44

Rape is having sex with someone, absent their consent. The boy is 14, he cannot give consent legally.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 07:41 PM
3

Cats are pure evil, if they have opposable thumbs I have absolutely no doubt what so ever they will be strangling their owners to death in the middle of the night.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 09:23 AM
3

Unfortunately for me, my preferred type of fictional works ain't much better; here's the plot to probably 90% of all fantasy novels I've read: Main character is pulled out of his comfort zone / main character goes on a small quest Plot twist: some evil lord / wizard / God that was evil because "fuck you that's why" is going to destroy the world Blah blah blah encounters with minions, narrow escapes, blah blah blah. Good guys won, never expected that! The end. Bonus chapter. Turns out the bad guy…
/r/MGTOW05/01/17 08:12 PM
10

For other fun facts, Google Naomi Parker.
/r/MGTOW19/12/16 06:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter