TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Eleutherlothario Archive

View 0 posts and 138 comments by Eleutherlothario on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Could whomever was instrumental in having my comment removed let me know how it "promoted identity-based hate or attacks". Especially after just two views.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:51 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:21 AM
2

Old enough to have witnessed myself how the cycle of brokeness perpetuates through lazy and/or absent parenting. Old enough to have witnessed myself the results of parents treating their kids as fashion accessories or simply the result of their biological imperative. Fatherhood isn't a title you just fuck yourself into; it is a duty that you must live up to every day. Children aren't property, they are a responsibility. If someone abdicates their responsibility, the one who steps into that gap i…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 02:18 PM
-17

This bullshit, and it's stupid bullshit. Any man who steps in to be a good father for a child without one is a hero. He is filling a role that another man abandoned.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:02 PM
15

I was told outright , by a female hiring manager, that women mangers had a "bounty" due to the favoritism they received.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 09:11 PM
-1

Examples of women who aren't feminists? Of women who are 100% in their son's corner? I know several personally but unless we run in the same circles, you wouldn't know them.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:28 AM
-1

Yeah, that is bullshit. Plenty of examples to the contrary, if you care to look
/r/MensRights20/12/25 10:16 PM
9

I would rather you went to the toxic feminist subs and defend us to them I see that as being a completely useless exercise. Nobody is going to convince them of anything and they will not change their minds. On anything. As the saying goes, you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into in the first place. Let them have their patch of barren ground that they have poisoned with their own vitriol and hatred. Rather, be the change you want to see. A short, friendly con…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:27 PM
2

And that would be example 6-million of why the term 'hate speech' has lost any meaning and relevance.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 06:30 PM
1

You're not getting any support because participating in underground fights is a *really* dumb thing to do. Fights are regulated for very good reasons - and those reasons were established over hundreds (thousands?) of years of young men getting hurt, disabled or killed for no good reason.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 02:45 AM
0

A friendly suggestion: throwing personal insults degrades your credibility. If you want to be taken seriously, learn how to make your point without personal attacks.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:25 PM
6

I think I was pretty clear. 8 or so posts flogging your sub, all upvoted to around +8. When I see coordinated actions, I figure there's someone doing the coordinating. I joined your sub, but at first glance it looks like it's mostly low-effort memes. I'll hang around for a while.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 01:33 PM
5

How many of these are real people and how many are bots?
/r/MensRights10/09/25 01:22 PM
12

This quite clearly violates the AUP policies of every major social media platform in existence and I'm certain that the admins and moderators will act swiftly to remove this bit of hate speech and ban the user that posted it. That's what happens, right?
/r/EverydayMisandry20/07/25 05:11 PM
2

By remembering that correlation isn't causation
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:58 PM
7

Just tell him that
/r/MensRights28/06/25 03:41 AM
22

Absolutely correct
/r/MensRights25/05/25 11:15 PM
-1

I'd like to second the call for a link to actual evidence. However it's interesting to compare the standard of proof for misogyny vs misandry. We're looking a transcript of the pilot directly admitting fault while feminists blame men or 'the patriarchy' whenever something bad happens to a woman.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/25 04:04 PM
3

Second Hand Lions
/r/MensRights13/04/25 09:31 PM
11

Seeing that this clearly fits the definition of hate speech and would obviously violate the TOS of every social media in existence, I'm sure that moderators leapt into action and promptly removed these posts as soon as they were reported. Right?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/04/25 11:44 PM
158

Uncalled for? It's fucking hate speech. Does this organization have an inclusiveness policy? If so, this incident clearly violated that policy.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 12:24 AM
6

What 'it'? The patriarchy?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 10:57 PM
7

considering that most elites are males, do you really not understand why that is significant to most feminists? If you accept what I stated above, then the obvious conclusion is that gender is a mostly independent variable. I do not understand why it's significant to feminists because I don't understand feminists. Their worldview is inconsistent and doesn't stand up to scrutiny (see above). I’m inclined to believe what Joe Rogan says - that most men live lives of quiet desperation. That quote go…
/r/MensRights06/12/24 08:53 PM
8

"Patriarchy theory" is how I've heard it referred to, so that's the term that I used. I think it's incredibly generous to dignify that line of thought with a quasi-scientific aura. The 'male elites' that you refer to - what percentage of the population are they? One or two percent? What about everyone else and why are they ignored? Most of the homeless population are men. Why don't they count in the gender-power equation? How about the others - the plumbers, farmers and everyone else who spends …
/r/MensRights06/12/24 08:27 PM
11

I'm not the one you replied to, but here is what I'd like the left to do: Step 1: stop making the situation worse. Immediately stop advocating for gender-based policies. Step 2: fix what you broke. Start repealing all gender-based laws, programs and policies currently on the books and rewrite them to be inclusive. Step 3. Abandon patriarchy theory and recognize that terms like 'toxic masculinity' are hate speech
/r/MensRights06/12/24 08:09 PM
8

If feminists were to ... do a 180-degree turn, You mean if they would start advocating for equality and stop their current campaign of spreading hatred and animosity? Yes, I for one would be absolutely ecstatic.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 10:52 PM
1

If you want a life better than what you could have living off welfare, it's up to you to go out and earn it. It can be considered a privilege to have opportunities to do so - many in the world do not. People born into extreme poverty in areas without access to education or reliable food sources, women born in regressive places like Afghanistan do not have those opportunities. So yes, the opportunity to better your life by choosing to working smart and hard is a privilege not enjoyed by everyone.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 06:47 PM
8

There should be a metric that measures how quickly a personal attack is levied in response to a comment. TTI - Time to Insult perhaps. I'd say that a TTI of 1 is a virtual guarantee that feathers were ruffled, likely by making an uncomfortable point. That, or it's coming from a culture that is pure fucking poison. In this case, it's both. Feminists - do better.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:27 PM
3

If someone becomes a billionaire by offering a product or service that other people voluntarily purchase, then they deserve every bit of it.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 06:13 PM
5

Small fingers. A definite plus for doctors once you pass a certain age.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 02:07 PM
3

The term 'toxic masculinity' is hate speech and should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 02:15 PM
2

The term "toxic masculinity" just be viewed as hate speech. A term like "lazy [ethnic group]" wouldn't be considered acceptable, neither should 'toxic masculinity'.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:37 PM
1

Holy thread resurrection Batman. Fwiw, no argument from me.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 01:15 AM
7

Peak feminism - when "he's looking at me" is taken seriously coming from anyone over 6.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 01:19 AM
54

There's nothing wrong with supporting woemen. There is something wrong with ignoring the rest of the population
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/22 04:25 PM
11

When it comes to health, men's needs are being addressed. Prostrate cancer is being researched and checked. Lots of research and treatment for heart attacks. Women have more unique health issues due to biology and even if you want to label women's health care as "special privileges" , I'm perfectly fine with that. I would disagree with that label because the health programs are based on a tangible, identifiable need. As stated elsewhere, this is a really stupid hill to die on. You are wrong, pla…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:51 PM
42

Social programs based on need are a good thing and this is obviously a need that is unique to women. Same as pregnancy and childbirth related health care. I'm good with this one.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:10 PM
13

No he's not. Any customer-facing role has an element of PR and part of that is doing exactly what OP is talking about
/r/MensRights14/07/22 10:36 PM
14

Why does it matter? This is the only context - when talking about men - where generalized negative statements about an identifiable group are considered acceptable. If this were any other context, if the subject was any other group, making negative generalized statements would be considered to be bigotry and treated as hate speech. Go to any mainstream subreddit or any large-enough social media site and say you want to talk about 'black crime'. No amount of explanation that you are only talking …
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:20 PM
0

He is entitled to his own opinion and he is free to express them, but this time it was rude.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 01:15 AM
14

It is hate speech. A term used by bigots to disparage the ones they hate.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:10 AM
12

why target masculinity specially Because the people that use the term are showing their own biases. It's not an accident - they are normalizing the demonization of men. Look - no one, single group has a monopoly on toxic behavior. Of course there are toxic men, just like there are toxic women and toxic black, white, brown, yellow and green people. It's a human characteristic. The problem is the general usage and acceptance of the term. If the target was any other group, the term wouldn't be seen…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 09:14 PM
8

What is unclear?
/r/MensRights23/04/22 05:57 PM
32

I think that we should treat the term 'toxic masculinity' as hate speech. Because it certainly fits the definition.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 05:16 PM
7

Cool???? Ye gods, I can't keep the one I have happy, much less try to chase after another three.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:29 PM
1

It doesn't faze me when someone out there says something sexist or stupid. After all, there are a lot of sexist and stupid people out there. It doesn't even faze me when an activist group says something sexist or stupid. After all, sexist and stupid people tend to clump together and become activists. I expect that from them. ​ What really frosts my wheaties is when an organization that claims to stand up for diversity and inclusiveness prints sexist stupid shit like this. The fact that someone o…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:29 PM
53

Hating someone because of thier skin, gender, size, shape, background, hair colour, shoe size or any other immutable characteristic is morally repugnant. Making wide-sweeping generalizations about any community that shares any immutable characteristic is intellectually lazy. I thought we established this generations ago. It's not up to you to convince your friend if she flat out refuses to be convinced. It is up to you to be the best person you can be by not doing any of the above.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 08:01 PM
13

He also said this, which you missed: On every position men and women have exactly THE same base salary. Looks like your selective reading caused you to assume there was a bias.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:18 PM
1

The last study on home labour done by the UN specifically excluded the types of jobs done by men (home repair, vehicle maintenance, etc.) and went on to conclude that women do more unpaid labour then men. Quelle surprise. That led to the usual bleating by the activists and the usual headlines from the media. This of course leads to more feminist-written legislation by the government. Not an accident.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 02:30 PM
7

For the 45932845th time, supporting men's rights does not equal hating women. Simple, blind hatred is the domain of the feminists, and we need to offer the world something better than that.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:51 PM
1

The world has not gone mad. What has happened is that our governments, intuitions, most large corporations and media have decided to give power to mad people. That encourages mad people to proliferate and spread their hateful ideology. It's kind of like creating a swamp and wondering why pond scum appears.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:21 PM
1

First of all, if there was any actual calls for violence in this sub that the mods didn't remove, I'd like to see it. From what I've seen, the mods here are very careful and very diligent - they have to be, given the political climate that the Reddit admins have imposed. ​ Criticism of feminism isn't misogyny. Pointing out it's many flaws, double standards, incorrect assumptions and hypocrisies isn't misogyny. The /r/TwoXChromosomes/ post is the latest in a long, long pattern of using a tragic e…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:57 PM
2

THE THINKING-PATTERN OF NEGATIVE ARBITRARY GENERALIZATIONS. The [wo]men in those forums must also take responsibility and be very aware and careful about what they write. ​ I would challenge you to issue the same statement to the denziens over at /r/TwoXChromosomes and see how well it goes for you.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:22 PM
4

Ok, I see now. Everyone is "right wing. What a convenient way to escape reality Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:37 PM
2

Fair enough. https://www.google.com/search?q=is+hillary+clinton+a+feminist https://www.google.com/search?q=is+justin+trudeau+a+feminist https://www.google.com/search?q=is+jagmeet+singh+a+feminist https://www.google.com/search?q=chrystia+freeland+feminist https://www.google.com/search?q=is+joe+biden+a+feminist I think this is a classic case of the exception proving the rule.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 02:55 AM
3

You're dodging the question. You are the one who came in here saying that you cannot be a feminist and a socialist, despite in reality there is a nearly complete overlap between the two. Yes, there is a difference between the two ideologies but in practice they cohabit. The challenge to you remains. Show me a politician from a mainstream conservative party who has identified as a feminist. Hell - show me a politician from a mainstream left/Liberal party who has identified as not being a feminist…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:08 PM
5

Name a politician from a mainstream conservative party that has self-identified as a feminist. Once you've done that, I've got pages of names of politicians from left/liberal parties that have self-identified as a feminist.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:11 PM
14

Feminism and the left have marched hand-in-hand for decades. The overlap between the two may not be 100% but the difference is academic, not pragmatic.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:55 PM
1

Because looking at the state of the world and the sheer volume of human suffering would lead to the conclusion that any so-called Supreme being out there is completely indifferent to us and is not worthy of our devotion and worship.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:26 PM
6

No because men were being oppressed right along beside them. Feminism is the result of selection set bias.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 12:01 PM
25

The phrase "toxic masculinity" is hate speech. If feminists want to work with MRA, they can eliminate it's usage.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 04:16 AM
68

The phrase "toxic masculinity" is hate speech and should be as socially unacceptable as the other terms that we no longer use.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:10 PM
4

FDS is the symptom. The disease is the hypocrisy and wilful blindness that has infected the Reddit admins, our leaders and institutions. I don't know what the cure is. Pointing out their hypocrisy doesn't seem to be working. Expecting them to live up to their own standards doesn't seem to be working.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:44 PM
2

Always has been
/r/MensRights30/05/21 03:27 PM
7

This is what happens after several decades of feminists setting the language, tone and direction of public discussion. They have crafted a generation of entitled, spoiled young women who can't see anyone's problems but their own and refuse to see any privilege other than the ones they have been programmed to believe.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 09:14 PM
12

Has r/againsthatereddits ever said anything about the rampant insanity that is r/fds?
/r/MensRights03/05/21 02:10 PM
484

Hypocrites and liars Always were and always will be Edit - challenge them to change their wording to state that white people and men are excluded from the policy. At least that would be honest.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 08:36 PM
57

That's got to be a satire sub.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 10:49 PM
5

I'll second that one. For someone to manage a group of technical people without domain knowledge takes humility and I have had exactly one of those in my career.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:19 PM
5

If they're reasonable people, why did they ban you?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 09:50 PM
135

So - Deacon was suspended and had to issue an apology for putting on a dress and wig while the author of a sexist proposal to violate the civil rights of approximately half the UK population continues to be venerated???
/r/MensRights15/03/21 05:18 PM
6

Because the people - meaning the corporations, the social media giants, the organizations and the governments - that do so are hypocrites. Plain and simple. They say one thing and do something else. ​ I guarantee that every one of them has a published 'diversity and inclusion' policy that proclaims their commitment to diversity and openness but when it comes to enforcement of that policy, it is in one direction only. And it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see what direction that is.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 08:57 PM
0

Well, let's not forget that at one time men-only clubs did exist. ​ Feminists sued to be allowed in.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 08:19 PM
7

If the target was any other group, that article would never have been published. If the target was any other group, the author would face censure and the publisher would face outrage. People who express the same views towards other groups are labelled as "racist" and are shunned by most of society. ​ Feminism is projection.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:05 PM
2

I'm never surprised by the existence of people with bigoted, prejudiced, sexist or racist views, such as this. I am constantly disappointed by institutions that proclaim their policies on inclusiveness and diversity, then turn around and completely gut those policies in favour of some vocal groups. If any other group were the target of this, the media would be beside themselves and would call it exactly what it is: sexism. If any other group were the target of this, Ms Jones would lose her job, …
/r/MensRights11/03/21 05:40 PM
1

I am never surprised to hear of people with half-baked, crazy, ill - conceived or just plain wrong ideas. I an constantly disappointed by those in authority who tolerate, accept or promote half-baked, crazy, ill - conceived or just plain wrong ideas because they might offend the wrong group of people.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 03:47 PM
12

Funny, that's what you seem to be doing. "the wheel is turning the other way around"
/r/MensRights17/02/21 03:08 PM
26

To quote another commenter: They were so afraid to discriminate against a black female that they paid her more than they wanted to. They weren't at all afraid of discriminating against a white man so they paid him what they feel the position was worth. This isn't "the wheel turning the other way" (as if that would justify it), this is blatant institutionalized racism. I find it incredibly ironic that the woke crowd used the false spectre of institutionalized racism as a tool to enshrine it for t…
/r/MensRights17/02/21 02:45 PM
1

completely relevant! In his mind, how could a society run by women even be a thing? so it must have come about from a lack of rational thinking men, right? It is irrelevant because we are not discussing your ex's assumptions about women or society in general. We're not discussing the reasons behind feminism's rise in our society. We are discussing a specific scenario: that of someone looking at someone else and making assumptions and judgements on that person based on the group they are categori…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 07:21 PM
1

I would call that a personal problem, one that I would hope would be addressed by therapy. Edit/Addendum: I completely understand that the natural reaction to a traumatic experience would be to hate the type of person that harmed you. But as I have stated a few times, we are more than instinctive, reactionary creatures. We are rational. We have the capability of self-introspection and we can transcend those primitive urges. We don't have to live from that lizard brain at the base of our skulls -…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 06:53 PM
1

what you're implying here is that men are and have been the marginalized group. No, I have not said anything of the kind. Not even close. And what we know of history is that men weren't the ones who were treated as second class citizens at best and property at worst That's a pretty one-sided story, repeated by feminists and debunked quite regularly here in this sub. But there's no need to get into that because it is irrelevant. I am saying that, right here, right now, it is bigotry to make assum…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:33 PM
0

We learn this mindset as a result of our experiences with Whites. If anything, that's one of the good things the Black Panthers has done. It allows us to sniff out threats before they happen. We learn this mindset as a result of our experiences with police. If anything, that's one of the good things BLM has done. It allows us to sniff out threats before they happen. I would call those statements incorrect and bigoted, just as the two examples I posted and the original one that I based them off o…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:19 PM
1

OK, let's try an experiment. ​ We learn this mindset as a result of our experiences with blacks. If anything, that's one of the good things white supremacy has done. It allows us to sniff out threats before they happen. ​ We learn this mindset as a result of our experiences with Indians. If anything, that's one of the good things the army has done. It allows us to sniff out threats before they happen.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:02 PM
1

She is equating threats with men. With no other group would this be tolerated.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:45 PM
2

We learn this mindset as a result of our experiences with men. If anything, that's one of the good things feminism has done. It allows us to sniff out threats before they happen.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:31 PM
2

I think the analogy has broken down. You recognize your PTSD as your issue. The other poster used her experience to demonize men in general.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:24 PM
1

Yes, absolutely. However, we are rational, thinking beings. We can look at the many trucks on the road and the number of times cars and trucks interact and realize the chances of having an accident are very small. We can drive according to the traffic laws, knowing they are there to make us safer. We can take extra precautions, such as staying out of blind spots. Even if someone experiences trauma at the hands of another, it is not rational to conclude that all people of that type are dangerous.…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:09 PM
12

It's terrible that you went through that and I hope that you recover fully. If we go according employment statistics, your assault was probably investigated by men. If you went to a hospital and saw a doctor, it likely was a man. If your assailant was tried and convicted, it was probably by men. And it will be mostly men that keep your assailant behind bars. Yet you let the actions of one man colour your perceptions of all the others?
/r/MensRights06/02/21 07:08 AM
18

In nearly every discussion of false accusations, it takes about a nanosecond for someone to bring up statistics in an attempt to minimize the perceived risk. Something to keep in mind: when they talk about the statistics of false accusations, they're really referring to the rate that accusations were proven to be false. As in, she did something blatantly stupid like making threats in public or conspiring with others. (Ghomeshi). When they talk about rape statistics, they really mean the rate at …
/r/MensRights01/02/21 01:23 AM
36

Here is evidence #643478534 that feminism is a hate movement and is not about equality and never will be about equality.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 11:29 PM
6

I've been able to ignore feminists every day for my entire life. Sounds like privilege to me :-)
/r/MensRights29/12/20 03:04 AM
174

As soon as you start discussing which group is harmed more, there is a tacit agreement that it matters. It doesn't. Help those who need it. Period.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 05:35 PM
2

Lower your flags and retreat, stopping at every home you pass by to beg forgiveness for sixty years of discrimination and censorship. Do that and we can have peace between men's rights activists and feminists. (With apologies to William Wallace)
/r/MensRights29/11/20 06:14 AM
6

You are supposed to just sit there and take it. They are supposed to be protected and above being mocked. I don't know if you were being facetious or sarcastic, but that is exactly the case.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 02:06 AM
1

You don't get to pretend that race doesn't exist, and that the United States wasn't built on 400 years of racism enshrined into laws which all impacted generational wealth accumulation and opportunity, just because it upsets you. Well, I'm not American and we're not talking about an American problem, so you're completely off base on that one.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 12:57 AM
2

I have a similar background and went through the same thing a few years back. My sympathies to you. I hope you find a new position and get back on your feet soon. Feel free to msg me privately if you like.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 12:49 AM
13

If I get accused I'll just sue. Company: has team of highly paid lawyers Woman: has a GoFundMe war chest filled by twitterati, feminist organizations, and celebrities looking for 'victims' to save Judge: got her law degree and went into practice so she could "make a difference" You: have your tape ​ Don't delude yourself into thinking that will be a fair fight.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 03:50 PM
51

This, a thousand times this. I've been in tech for over 25 years and can attest this is 100% accurate. I've had hiring mangers say outright that women are 'in demand' for tech positions and 'command a premium'. They're not even trying to appear fair anymore. The woke crowd *assumes* and *states outright* that if you're a white man, you must have benefited from racism and/or sexism. Without knowing anything about the circumstances of your life. Of course, this is used to justify their favorite pr…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 03:39 PM
2

Sure they are being screwed by big corps Hate to break it to you, but no, they are not. There's a premium placed on women with any useful skills in the corporate world. Big corps are bending over backwards for women.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 03:14 AM
26

Let's try interpreting statistics the same way feminists do. Men, statistically speaking, are victimized by crime in greater rates than women. Therefore, women have nothing to be scared of. And men are criminally marginalized. Or something.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 07:32 PM
4

Have you bothered to solicit the opinions of any of your future ~victims~ err, clients?
/r/MensRights12/07/20 08:23 PM
4

Well, if you choose to interpret it that way, fine, go right ahead. But one thing is damn certain: that feminists have never shown that level of graciousness towards men. Countless mens’s lives have been disrupted, jobs lost, because of thoughtless quips, comments and jokes and the feminists have never accepted sarcasm as an acceptable defense. They made these rules, now they can live by them and I, for one, am quite happy to point out their blatant hypocrisy when they don’t.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 01:13 AM
8

That is not evident from the posted pics. Feminists have a long, sordid history of making unreasonable demands and unfortunately getting them, so I’m going to go on face value here.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 10:26 PM
10

They are advocating for denial of healthcare services, to prevent men from taking care of their own bodies. I can see a pretty strong argument that the 'body autonomy' line of reasoning fits here.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 08:54 PM
17

Like advocating for denying someone healthcare is much different
/r/MensRights09/07/20 06:27 PM
7

This. Video is the new second amendment. It should be blatantly fucking obvious by now that the judicial system is stacked against us. Your testimony is worthless, hers will be accepted as truth without scrutiny. The only defense is to have incontrovertible evidence of what actually happened, and that is video. Never go into a confrontation without video rolling. To have a second person recording another viewpoint is even better. Know how to start recording from sleep mode as soon as possible. A…
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:09 PM
11

It is sexist Given the current political climate, if you call attention to it, you will be treated like an old white man (how dare you) that needs to fade off into the sunset
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:00 PM
8

That word does not mean what they seem to think it means
/r/MensRights07/06/20 04:38 PM
8

He. Was. Fired. For. Someone. Else’s. Actions. Gender has nothing to do with this. When can we just come out and say it outright: this is a fucking witch hunt and the “progressive” mob is howling for blood?
/r/MensRights06/06/20 05:02 AM
15

Don't forget that the "It's OK to be white" signs were widely reported as "hate crimes", by authorities and university officials who should have had a sufficient grasp on the English language to know that they weren't.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 04:19 AM
6

Who said we demonize women? The feminists who want to silence us.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 01:31 PM
0

I don't follow - blocked from where?
/r/MensRights24/05/20 06:56 PM
5

Calls for violence is not "standing up for ourselves". You are doing far more harm than good here.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 06:37 PM
9

Are you trying to give the feminists the ammunition they need to get this sub banned? Because that’s exactly what you are doing.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 05:25 PM
3

Don’t EVER think that’s an accident or oversight
/r/MensRights23/05/20 11:33 PM
11

The existence of people with noxious views such as this doesn’t surprise me. What does bother me is how these views can continue to be repeatedly expressed on a platform that claims to be “inclusive”. Reddit, and social media platforms in general, intentionally turn a blind eye to this while crusading loudly against the opposite.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:06 AM
4

Thanks for providing a great example of why this sub, and men's rights in general, need to exist
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:32 PM
10

No, it is not. Some make it put to be but it is most definitely not.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 02:53 AM
41

So - why does this have to be a one-or-the-other kind of thing? Why didn’t they say both are bad?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 11:33 PM
5

I doubt if it would help at all, but you may want to ask her if she has ever asked any women who didn't go into tech why not. I'd bet dollars to donuts that she hasn't because nobody ever does. Doesn't stop them from jumping to unfounded conclusions though.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 06:00 PM
7

Tech industry insider here First of all, by and large, women in tech positions are coddled. They are not held up to the same standards that men are. They do not have to produce as much. When it comes to disciplinary action or layoffs, the possibility of a discrimination lawsuit is always considered and that provided some extra shielding that men don't get. Women in tech positions "command a premium" - and that's not my opinion, that is a quote from a feminist hiring manager. 'Women in tech' prog…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:51 PM
1

And they're the ones fighting against patriarbullshi I mean traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:36 AM
9

This is how feminists work - they take experiences that are common to all people and claim exclusivity over them. Here's a news flash - women aren't the only ones doing unpaid work to keep the house running. Absolutely ridiculous to say otherwise. Yet the feminists continually kvetch about it as if it's evidence of some great oppression conspiracy.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 11:53 PM
13

This stems from the leftist notion that we nothing but the group we belong to, which is utter rubbish. If there are deeds that need to be apologized for, that apology needs to come from those responsible for those acts. If you had no hand in the deed, you bear no responsibility and have no need to apologize. The left, however, tries to tell us that just because you share a characteristic with someone else, you are somehow responsible for what they did. Extraction of payment usually follows. It i…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:30 PM
64

Women in the workforce today aren’t disadvantaged, they’re coddled.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 09:13 PM
5

The thing that nobody is talking about is that the current political climate enabled Holmes to perpetuate her scam. She was everything the media and diversity panels were looking for - a young, hot, smart female entrepreneur. And that's all they wanted - being able to actually deliver on promises made wasn't a priority. If she hadn't fit the image they were looking for, her claims would have been examined more closely.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 08:09 PM
1

There's no lack of people, of any gender, making hypocritical and excessive demands. All should be denied or ignored, unless specific situations justify otherwise.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 04:45 PM
12

Simple. Treat everyone as individuals, not as a member of a politically-useful group. Make no assumptions about individuals based on whatever category you want to put them in. See people’s individual characteristics as their own. This is from the how-not-to-be-a-shitty-person handbook.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 12:50 PM
2

“Collateral harm” is an interesting way of spelling bigotry and hatred.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 04:11 PM
1

We have seen numerous examples of what can only be described as virulent, blatant hatred from this sub. So - what is the response from the Southern Poverty Law Center? How about againsthatereddits? Antifa?
/r/MensRights01/01/20 08:33 PM
3

An honest question for the feminist lurkers: Yes, the perpetrators of the recent tragic events were men. But the vast majority of the first responders that attended the scene were also men. The people that ran into danger, mostly men. The people that treated the casualties, likely mostly men. The surgeons that patched up the victims. The men that currently guard the accused. The men that will be involved as the case makes its way through the justice system. ​ On one side you have hundreds of men…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:07 PM
7

Bullshit. While there are no guarantees in life, working smart and hard has a very strong tendency to be rewarded. The “success is due to luck” line is a leftist lie peddled by those who want to make you dependant on whatever they’re currently selling.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:12 AM
17

Authority forced him to share the product of his own efforts with a woman who came up short and was raising a stink about it. Sounds like a fairly accurate model of what he can expect from society. Seems like a good lesson to me.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:07 PM
5

Dear GOD I would. I want a politician like that in Canada. Someone who will take on the leftoids, point out their hypocrisy, call them out and not apologize for it. (What is it with politicians constantly apologizing anyway? Why can't anyone say "No, I will not apologize for you taking my words out of context, twisting them around and perverting their true meaning?)
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:17 PM
2

Very astute; I agree completely. One thing that I earnestly yearn for is for politics to rise above the identity-based paradigm that has dominated political discourse for the past few decades. It is good to be reminded to leave it behind and aim for something better.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 08:07 PM
2

So, you agree that both sexes do not have to fulfill various industries equally? I'm ambivalent about the whole thing. I think that real-life skills, experience, knowledge are far, far more important than gender or colour. As in an order of magnitude or two more important. To me, demographic breakdown of any particular industry is no more than an "Hmm, that's kind of interesting" kind of thing. So, when we see stats that more men die in combat and in dangerous jobs - this isn't because the world…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:29 PM
3

Again, speaking for myself and not anyone else here and certainly not for any movement. even if women apply in equal numbers many of the female applicants won't be able to meet the requirements IMHO, that is a question for the feminists. From what I've seen, the feminist movement denies that this situation even exists and undergoes great mental gymnastics to deny that it exists. They look at the outcomes, the discrepancy between male and female, scream sexism and demand equality while ignoring t…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:16 PM
4

I won't claim to speak for everyone else here, just myself. The problem that I have is that performance standards are being compromised for the sake of political correctness. If a certain job, any job, requires a certain level of physical proficiency, then all candidates across the board should be held to the same standard. Especially ones where lives are on the line. In those situations, equality just doesn't matter. Shouldn't even be considered. If a woman can meet the requirements and can per…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter