~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | For men who want to be a woman's "best", isn't this directly compatible with women being hypergamous?I think its more about the ideal, that men want to continuously improve themselves for both themselves and their partners. Women are judges of male success and being better than other men in their eyes is a good metric. Also, loyalty (and by extention, monogamy) is also part of the standard that both men and women are judged. Do not forget, women also compete for desirable men! I'm sure that the kind of men who are successful and have achieved some form of that "woman's best" ideal have no short… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/21 10:51 PM |
| – | If you agree that young attractive women leverage their looks for high level Men, doesn't it then make sense when successful Men later cheat or leave their older wives?It makes sense on a surface level. But having a wife is more than just guaranteed sex. Its really about long-term stability, and in large part the ability to raise a family. It is a partnership- you tie your life together with someone else's and work together to get through life. Throwing that away SOLELY for a hot, young, piece of ass just because she is attractive is not necessarily a sensible decision. For a young, attractive woman though? Landing a rich, older man who will provide for you is… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/21 10:40 PM |
| 3 | "Above a certain income level, all men are paying for sex" Scott AdamsInteresting quote, but don't all men pay for sex in one way or another? Sex (at least in a social and somewhat biological sense) is something that is "earned", and all things that are earned require some sort of sacrifice in time, effort, and, of course, money. I'm sure at the highest levels of income, these people have already turned their sacrifices into money, so that becomes the method they use to "earn" sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/21 10:31 PM |
| 1 | Why do we push for legalizing prostitution yet denigrate the men who patronize prostitutes?OP's argument refers to people who openly support the decisions of prostitutes to go into their profession, apparently in the name of empowerment of sexuality while denigrating male sexuality. Your argument is not quite the same because you do not believe the decision of to go into prostitution is a positive one, while they do. However, OP provides no specific examples of this kind of behavior :/ so I personally believe that your point of view is more common than the one he is discussing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/21 05:57 AM |
| 1 | Why do we push for legalizing prostitution yet denigrate the men who patronize prostitutes?The precise difference is the "de-stigmatizing". The idea is there is a push for cultural acceptance of sex workers. The issue with your argument is that the Crocs on their own are not a good example for this. Crocs were not illegal due to them being believed to be immoral. At the core of this, the OP's argument is different. It's really discussing an apparent moral contradiction in the beliefs of the supporters of the movement. They believe that sex work is moral and respectable, but that the m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/21 03:58 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter