TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EliCaaash Archive

View 25 posts and 248 comments by EliCaaash on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3727

Legal RightsEliCaaash/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:42 AM
1130

Edu./Occu.EliCaaash/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:56 PM
1076

EliCaaash/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:12 PM
576

False AccusationEliCaaash/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:32 AM
435

Social IssuesEliCaaash/r/MensRights03/02/16 02:50 PM
247

Social IssuesEliCaaash/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:34 AM
228

Edu./Occu.EliCaaash/r/MensRights24/10/15 10:23 PM
142

FeminismEliCaaash/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:39 PM
128

Marriage/DivorceEliCaaash/r/MensRights20/07/16 09:28 PM
84

FeminismEliCaaash/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:40 AM
83

Marriage/DivorceEliCaaash/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:49 PM
61

Social IssuesEliCaaash/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:31 PM
55

Social IssuesEliCaaash/r/MensRights24/11/15 08:30 PM
50

EliCaaash/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:23 AM
41

Social IssuesEliCaaash/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:55 AM
34

EliCaaash/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:17 AM
33

False AccusationEliCaaash/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:41 PM
29

Edu./Occu.EliCaaash/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:04 PM
23

Social IssuesEliCaaash/r/MensRights27/03/16 12:41 PM
23

GeneralEliCaaash/r/MensRights24/05/16 07:36 PM
22

Social IssuesEliCaaash/r/MensRights15/11/15 12:34 AM
8

EliCaaash/r/MensRights03/08/16 01:55 PM
6

FeminismEliCaaash/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:23 AM
5

Activism/SupportEliCaaash/r/MensRights19/11/15 05:35 PM
4

GeneralEliCaaash/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:45 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's called 'rape'.
/r/PussyPass30/07/18 06:37 PM
1

I'd be happy for them to be taught analytical thinking, which would make that perfectly obvious. If you need to teach children propaganda, it's because you know very well your arguments and ideology are utterly redundant.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 11:38 AM
5

It's not as bad I think as it could be. The real issue here is that it's only a 'problem' when women do worse. What about all the other times in education when boys do worse? That stinks. Exams probably aren't the best, or even a good way of measuring aptitude and preparedness for the world of work. If exams don't really measure ability, or aptitude, but merely aptitude under pressure, then another way of conducting these measurements seems like fair and equitable treatment.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 05:35 PM
2

True but the whole story stinks. They're making out the father to be the cause of her suicide, because he got full custody of his kids (because of her erratic behaviour) and she had trouble seeing them. They don't say why she had trouble, but they do say she was an alcoholic drug addict with mental health issues who tried to commit suicide every 3 months or so. Whilst painting him out to be the cause of her death, none of the bother to give him them benefit (as the courts obviously did on actual…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:56 PM

The irony here being that these are the disabled and low-mobility seats she's squatting on. Perhaps she has a gimpy leg and is entitled to one, but nothing entitled her magic bag of cuntishness to a seat it hasn't paid for.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:44 PM

Of course it isn't a job. You have to work to do a job, like the man who has to hand over half of his earnings to the woman who ended their marriage by cheating on him. Show me a job that pays 90 million for literally no work.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:44 PM
1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 01:56 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 10:29 AM
1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:47 AM
1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 08:35 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 08:28 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 06:23 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 06:15 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 06:00 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 12:02 AM
5

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:19 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 09:12 AM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 09:03 AM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 04:01 AM
0

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:49 AM
1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:02 PM

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights05/07/16 12:47 AM
1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:24 PM
1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:12 AM
-1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:13 PM
3

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:06 PM
1

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVER…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:03 PM
5

Articles from some of the people who may be losing their jobs: We Spoke to the Campaigner Who Helped Ban Men's Rights Activists from Toronto Pride Men's Rights Activists Make Millions Because White Boys Want to Feel Oppressed A Men's Rights Group Is Suing Their College Because They Feel 'Excluded' We Spoke to Lauren Chief Elk, the Woman Behind #GiveYourMoneytoWomen, About the Power of Cold Hard Cash Shame :(
/r/MensRights24/05/16 07:41 PM
0

I was agreeing with you dickhead :) Strongly agreeing at that.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:39 AM
1

Against classism - shows homeless guy. Middle class feminists: Ignoring working class men and women since forever.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 10:51 AM
16

That's completely shocking reading. Canadian courts rule that fatherhood is societal, not genetic. So I take it that when a genetic father decides he wants nothing societally to do with his unborn / newborn progeny, he's off the hook right? Haha, pull the fucking other one. The worst thing is these clinics lying to men, allowing them to think that they're carriers of the person who fucked their wives' diseases. Actively lying to men about the truth and conspiring with the women to let it happen.…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:26 AM
10

I think (hope) that is actually what she was getting at. She was treading carefully because she didn't want to be attacked by the feminazi hordes, but it seemed like she was cleverly declining to identify herself as a feminsit, whilst also saying she didn't see the need for constant clarification as to who is and who isn't, instead judging people by their actions and deeds, whilst also acknowledging that men are victims of these kinds of issues too. In my mind it was rather an ingenious, adroit …
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:17 PM

Cool, I'm Uk too so that's quite bizarre innit fam?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:53 AM

Not for me, or on any international proxies that I've tried - but here's an archive - https://archive.is/Shfrp
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:36 AM

It is prevalent throughout the media, academia and politics. This is such a bizarre comment considering that men's organisations are regularly demonised and banned in universities across the Western world. Leave academia? When did you last visit a University, the 1920s? Modern academia is an absolute shitehole of feminist bigotry and anti-male prejudice. BRB I have a sexual consent class to attend, being a potential rapist and all.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:57 PM

/u/PhedoPhile Redditor for 0 days Comment Karma: - 5 Troll Status: Confirmed
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:02 PM
9

No, feminism is sexist and misandrist and basically evil to it's core. It is not about empowering women, it's all about attacking men. Feminism is a rotten hate movement that is totally irredeemable. There can be no rebranding. The crazies are the best part of it, because they allow people to see the true face of feminism. The most dangerous elements are the seemingly moderate ones, who spread their subtle man hate throughout society, education and the media, influencing young minds and poisonin…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:38 PM

I wish she'd have chosen Scientology like all the other mega-rich egotists who need that extra adulation in their lives.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 11:59 PM

No, I genuinely find egomaniacal feminists using dead people to push their sexist agendas really touching. I'm just weird like that.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:33 PM

It's been blown out of proportion by the media in order to attack anti-feminists, but I think it was in poor taste of Watson to post that quote. It seemed to me to be a tribute to feminism rather than the man himself. It's not even a good quote: There is nothing wrong with a man being a feminist, I think it is to our mutual advantage. It's hardly "I have a dream", is it? The message seems to translate as, 'join He for She', Alan Rickman said there was nothing wrong with it. Touching stuff.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:23 PM

She's missing the point entirely. Most of the time feminists don't talk about these issues in a way that supports other women, they do it in a way that blames all men, (even when it is painfully obvious to everyone what the real problem is.) This creates a false but pervasive perception that is pretty prevalent throughout society that women are always victims and men are always the perpetrator. Notice how this disingenuous, dangerous idealist says 'override discussions about women', rather than …
/r/MensRights14/01/16 08:09 PM

I looked into this after Nero's incessant taunting and the truth is that the entire index is crashing big time. What Twitter do or don't do is basically irrelevant to that. If he hadn't have kept banging on about it, I probably would have taken his word for it. NYSE One Month Chart NYSE One Year Chart But on the plus side, another recession!
/r/MensRights14/01/16 07:55 PM

Sweden is probably going to enjoy a massive swing to the right pretty soon, because of all the migrants abusing their goodwill. They've just put in border controls on the Oresund bridge between Copenhagen and Malmo, the first time Swedes and Danes have had to prove their identity to corss it since the 50s. The police are in trouble at the moment for covering up migrant sex attacks at a music festival last year. There have been numerous other incidences recently of migrants raping or sexually ass…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 06:40 AM
8

This is the entitlement of runaway privilege in action. I console myself with the knowledge that many of these bitter individuals will spend their lives looking for someone 'worthy' of them, only to die alone and broken when it turns out they were never quite the 'Cinderella' they believed themselves to be. For some people it's just a joke of course, but the overt misandry of the whole thing would cause a Western media meltdown were the genders reversed. Yet more evidence we live in a gynocentri…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:19 PM
5

I think we should encourage organisations that print articles like this with traffic. Good traffic stats will encourage editors to publish more articles along the same vein. I think posting this under an archived source is a little self defeating and everyone should consider clicking on the original link. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3387880/Rise-female-sex-pest-Think-s-men-harass-colleagues-wandering-hands-crude-taunts-Not-more.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490 I actua…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:46 AM
7

Only scary if you respect the field. Ideologically driven people (like the author) often begin with the answer they're looking for and work backwards from there. It's a well-documented phenomenon in social psychology. I'd be really interested to see a critique of the work to see if the author has displayed any obvious bias in this particular study. I'd do it myself but I'm not really equipped. My gut tells me she must have, but my gut doesn't deal in the falsifiable.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:54 AM

Little bit of background on the author for anyone who's interested.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:25 AM
11

"Hold on a minute love, I just need to turn me spunk off".
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:18 PM

The Guardian's future is far from assured. It's true they have some serious financial clout behind them but a quick look at the Wikipedia page for their finances shows that they're trying numerous different things to stop the financial rot. It's unlikely the trust can carry on absorbing such huge losses indefinitely, which as a former reader I think is absolutely magnificent. They've betrayed their moderate left-wing readership in a big way and have been warned time and time again to stop trolli…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:25 AM

There's a reason the Scold's Bridle was invented 500 years ago. I'm not saying it was a good thing, just that this female verbal and emotional abuse of their partner isn't a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:48 PM
3

Went to her Twitter page, first thing I see is a retweet of Jessica Valenti. She's clearly a radical, ideological sexist who has no place being commissioner of anything other than some irrelevant student union.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:43 PM

As opposed to the virulently misandrist group that posts regularly on the Guardian. Men's rights has it's share of misogynists, only a fool would deny it; but it is in no way a misogynist movement. Feminism has it's man haters also, but at its core it is a deeply misandrist movement. At and to its core, it is a hate movement against men, boys and masculinity.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:40 PM
4

Men are traditionally more likely to vote Labour According to (Warning PDF download) this study the split for Labour supporters is 49/51 male/female. Also, in the Labour party some of the votes go to Labour MPs, mostly male You're talking about 132 votes out of 245,520 votes cast. and the Trade Unions, also mostly male. Not according to the following website, apparently 55% of union members are women. https://web.archive.org/web/20150715055836/http://strongerunions.org/2015/06/03/8-surprising-fa…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:55 PM

No one wanted her as leader of the Labour party, so she's copying Hillary and trying to position herself as 'woman's champion of the year.' At some point she will reveal that the reason she lost the leadership contest was due to sexism, (despite of course there being more female voters than male in the UK). Cynical politician, playing the gender card.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:07 PM

And the BBC respond to this gender imbalance with the headline... https://archive.is/ZKATl IT'S A RECORD!!!
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:01 PM
3

Guys it's ok, it's on BBC 3. It's going to get seen by about 12 people and then the channel will be put exclusively online on March 26th 2016 because... nobody fucking watches it. The BBC will probably follow suit, or get privatised. In a way it's a shame because the BBC puts out a lot of great programming, but it has become way, way too political over the years, and considering it's position of power and importance in Britain and indeed the world, it needs to be reigned in sooner rather than la…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:30 AM
1

Forget about Islamists, it's feminists who are the real threat to the values we hold dear in our society. Values like 'innocent until proven guilty' and 'right to a fair trial'. But anyway, take it to court or STFU. Literally, STFU.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:17 PM

Hmmm, I can't imagine anything going wrong with this... If you're gonna start a witchunt using screenshots as your evidence, don't be surprised when it backfires spectacularly on you.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 05:24 PM
5

I wrote them a letter the other day, not about this, just about their feminist bias in general. I told them my next letter would be to my MP. Probably pissing into the wind, but you never know if it might do some good.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:35 AM

It's not that simple and it's really not as different as you'd think. George Bush Snr, George W. Bush, Jeb Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy... You still have the same kind of privilege, it's just not enshrined into a ridiculous feudal system with official titles and whatnot.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:07 PM

For me the bigger issue here is hereditary privilege and titles being passed down from parent to child, you want to talk about equality of any sort, start there. They got it through violence and murder, but if I murder them, I get sent to prison. Totally unfair set of circumstances, it should either be legal to fight them, or their titles should be voided.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:32 PM
3

I almost never have relationships with anyone if I can help it, too much compromise for my liking. It was weird reading about MGTOW recently and realising that it has probably applied to me for the last eight years or so of my life, but I don't like to adopt labels and I'm not going to start now. Some people like the sacrifices you have to make to get the rewards in a relationship, personally I can't abide compromise and that's not fair on anyone, so I keep my dealings with women casual which wo…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:47 AM
1

Non-geoblocked version. https://vimeo.com/146840835
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:52 PM

Non Geoblocked version - https://vimeo.com/146840835 This Morning is aired every weekday morning in Britain and Ireland and has over 1,000,000 viewers every day. Great bit of coverage, especially the part where Phillip Schofield lays into outrage culture at 4:16! Full Interview (Geoblocked to UK and Ireland.)
/r/MensRights24/11/15 08:36 PM
2

Me too, fucking hell this is an epidemic! /s
/r/MensRights23/11/15 08:05 PM
9

Archived link - https://archive.is/Z684M
/r/MensRights19/11/15 05:18 PM

I'd be very, very wary of politicising someone's suicide beyond the obvious fact of highlighting it as further evidence that suicide is a huge problem of epidemic proportions for men under 45. No one knows why this guy did what he did, his family and friends are going through hell right now, it's unlikely they'll appreciate his death being co-opted by the MRM without any of the facts being known. Right now all we can say is that it's a bitter irony that highlights the need for more to be done on…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:43 PM
2

lol, if only I'd have thought of posting that link two days ago and then kindly following it up with the full article... https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3suc96/mgtow_meet_the_men_giving_up_on_women_sunday/
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:58 AM
4

Apex fallacy You absolute genius. I've been looking for a pithy way to describe this fallacy for ages. The idea that you can extrapolate universal male privilege from the 1% = apex fallacy. Thanks!
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:55 AM
11

I agree completely.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:49 PM

I think he misguidedly added that for balance. Just to be clear, he's talking about a grand total of 95 men out of the 21 million or so of working age (18 - 64). If that doesn't make you laugh, I don't know what will.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:45 PM

Part II Of course there are men who have had unhappy lives and who feel hard done by by society. Does the MGTOW movement amount to any more than a posse of them getting together on the internet? Dean Esmay, the online activism director of the National Coalition for Men, a leading American men's rights group, insists that it does. He believes the brutal message of the MGTOWs has the capacity to end the gender war. "Women need to have a conversation about this, and in a very serious way, because m…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:31 PM

It's the media that will eventually turn on her imo. It's already trickling through. Whether the flood will come in time is anybody's guess, but I'm hopeful.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:29 PM

By the time the election comes around I think Hillary's feminist lies may very well sink her, rather than help her. The tide is turning; will it turn swiftly enough to sink this opportunist liar? We live in hope.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:18 PM

Many of the comments on the Express site suggesting the abused kid must be gay because he didn't enjoy being sexually molested by a fucking skank. I think the reason she should have gone to prison is because after getting caught, she tried to blame the child she molested. Those are not the actions of someone repentant for the deed, so much as crocodile tears from someone repentant about getting caught. A dangerous child predator has avoided a(n immediate) custodial sentence.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:14 PM
2

Fat does not equal undesirable. The advert wasn't even saying that. It was saying that given a choice between an obtainable fat chick and a wank-aid, men will feel less shame and revulsion with themselves if they choose the inanimate object they can hold in one hand. It's probably true in the majority of cases, but it does fly pretty close to the line of bullying. There is almost certainly a double standard with short men, but that doesn't necessarily make it right. I'm torn between finding both…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 07:07 PM
1

Check out this story as to how even highly intelligent people can have their lives completely taken over by a Sociopath. It happens more than you'd think, and the blame always falls squarely on the perpetrator. As it should. What you're describing isn't objectivity, not even close.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:32 PM

I'm not making any judgements on the victim, but this should motivate guys who can't get themselves a girlfriend (and actually want one) to try a lot harder. If this woman can convince her mate to have blindfolded strap-on sex 10 times whilst she puts on a pretend deep voice, there's just no excuse for anyone else.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:22 PM
2

I think some of it was Sargon followers and some was just people waiting until the last minute so as not to deter other potential donors. It wildly exceeded pretty much everyone's expectations, I know I should be cautious but I'm actually really stoked.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:19 PM

It's only a victory if feminists aren't allowed to control the narrative and blame everything on toxic masculinity. They're literally everywhere in Parliament, all over the Labour Party, The Liberal Democrats and the sole Green MP who is well-respected is one too. They're going to try and use this opportunity to bash masculinity (men) and promote their misandrist ideology. And if they succeed then it will be even worse for men, everywhere.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:22 PM

It's about as good as you can hope for from the Guardian. Apart from putting 'balanced' in inverted commas, it's basically representative of the story. I guess they were torn between their hatred of MRAs and their worship of women and it resulted in a reasonable representation of the facts for once.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:16 PM

Kickstarter total currently on $187,872. It's jumped around $16,000 in the last few hours. Fuck. Yes.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:57 AM
16

Your phallic imagery has been noted, shitlord.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:36 PM

Don't worry, next week's meeting is off. The head patriarch has come down with man-flu and will be recuperating in his privilege palace, being waited on by black midget lesbians and gay disabled transexuals until he feels well enough to begin oppressing financially secure, middle-class white women again. I'm sure I speak for us all when I wish Steve a speedy recovery. Edit spelling.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:34 PM

That's what I'm worried about too, but it's done now. I'd rather be in this position worrying about the inevitable smear attacks than wondering if it'll even reach the target. Hopefully someone rich will pitch in the extra at the end so Cassie can reach her third stretch goal. Would love to see a professional quality film at the end of this. Sadly I'm not that person and have given everything I can afford already.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:51 AM
3

Hoist by their own petard.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:46 PM

As much as I support Cassie in this endeavour, I am bitterly disappointed to see her playing the misogyny card against her first major, public opponent. I personally don't believe that Futrelle's attack is anywhere near approaching misogynistic and it worries me that Cassie's first line of defence is to portray it as such. I see it as one of the oldest feminist tricks in the book to shut down debate on any given issue. I'm sure she believes it, but even so I find the accusation troubling. Edit: …
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:09 AM

Once they lose exclusivity on the victimisation narrative, third wave feminism is over. Literally, over. The entire movement could have been about empowering women and encouraging them to go out and achieve great things. Instead it became a whinge-fest blaming all men (sorry, I mean the 'patriarchy') for issues that may or may not be issues in the first place, whilst offering no better solutions than 'make the men fix it for us'. Never a truer word was spoken than the recent adage that goes, 'We…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:19 PM
5

She just uses it to insult the people who forced her into the 'apology' and attempts to score petty, partisan, political, points against her ideological opponents. The woman has no shame. SorryNotSorryShitlords
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:55 AM

lol, no check out their other posts. We have a rogue SJW on our hands, threatened that they're finally losing their grip on the public narrative. Imagine talking about men's issues on a men's rights sub! I should just scrape off my hideous white skin with scouring pads and go and live in my privilege mansion, waited on by my black slave girls whilst using my friends in the stock market to oppress minorities and well-off middle-class teens on Tumblr. Talking about men's issues is OFF THE TABLE, s…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:38 PM

As annoyed as I am at Jess Phillips' comments, it's great to see these issues getting championed in the (admittedly) right wing press. It seems like the right is starting to wake up to the idea that men can be discriminated against just as much a women, whilst the left runs hit piece after hit piece trying to denounce imaginary threats and cover up the real issues. People like Jess Phillips playing their feminsit gender politics out in parliament are doing more damage to the left than anyone on …
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:57 PM
5

I've been saying this for years. Poverty is the major prohibiting factor to equality in the west. (Equality being equality of opportunity.) The idea that poor white men and boys are in any way economically advantaged over their female counterparts is absolute rot. The same is true of middle class men, or anyone outside of the 1%, basically. Good to see this is finally being recognised in a public domain, but don't expect Jezebel to be running with it anytime soon. White men are all privileged, d…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:48 PM
2

I think I understand why you're angry, but I think it's a bit of an overreaction to a minor point. I think the people reading it will be smart enough to deduce their own conclusions, just as you did. I don't see any dishonesty in the blurb, they can't prove there are troll pledges as you and I well know, that doesn't mean you can't suppose there will be using the evidence of past experience, coupled with the inflammatory nature of the subject matter. It's a reasonable assumption and no one has m…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:03 PM

Dude, it's called 'hedging your bets'. Hope for the best but prepare for the worst, it literally cannot hurt unless you're for some reason opposed to the film being funded? The more money that comes Cassie's way, the better production values she can put into her film. The better the values, the harder it will be for people to ignore. It's a win-win.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:27 PM

Pao! Oh wait, I mean Huffman! It's not coincidence that twox is a default sub and this one is barely tolerated, to the extent that againstmensrights is considered fine and dandy, but a video promoting a better understanding of gendered issues is considered too dangerous to stay up.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:23 PM
4

She's on Twitter you can let her know your feelings on the matter, there are a few people who have already done so. I think this is acceptable to say, it's not brigading to let people know about a public official's social media account, right? Keep it polite, remember that Britain has significantly harsher free speech laws than the US and you'll be fine. Here is the shortened URL with timestamps of the incident if anyone wants to use it for evidence - goo.gl/AzEzcp 14:54:00
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:45 PM
4

Oh my goodness, what a fantasist. She was literally typing out what she wanted to hear, using a mentally handicapped man as a sort of sexual ouija board for her perverted fantasies. I don't recall reading anything so strange and disturbing in a long time.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 09:35 AM
13

Lots of cynicism here but I'm damn well excited about this. About as excited as I've been about anything of this nature in a good long time. A lot of people are expecting some sort of bait and switch but that's just not the impression I got from the trailer or from anything that's come out of the film maker's mouth to date. I genuinely think this might be the eye opener that begins the process of bringing the idea of men's rights into the public consciousness. It's worth the risk many times over…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:17 PM

For me the idea is to manage your emotions in a healthy way. Allow yourself to feel without allowing yourself to wallow. Outrage culture and the 'triggering' nonsense is like a race to the bottom as to who can overreact the most. It's just another method of attention seeking without having to actually put any effort into your personality. Normal people put their efforts towards becoming someone other people will like and respond to, these kids just wail and expect to be treated as special cases,…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:09 PM
7

it is men who are dumber, and more brilliant. So you didn't read the article then?
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:13 AM
2

As if Marion Cotillard wasn't sexy enough already. What a woman!
/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:59 PM
8

The thing about Watson is, she never spoke for feminists, she has no fucking idea what feminism is. She never did! All that For the record, feminism by definition is: “The belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities..." was only tolerated because it gave them a good soundbite to shut up anti-feminists in debates. They hated that speech, but they tolerated it because Watson got so much praise over it and most of them weren't stupid enough to show themselves up over it. Bu…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:49 PM
56

She's a member of the 1% who starred in one of the highest grossing franchises in history, and had her character rewritten from the source material to end up being more of a hero than the main protagonist and cries sexism because she had an issue with a school play once, that may or may not have been down to her sex (or her god-awful acting ability IDK?) She should try being a low income male or female for a year, she'll learn that feminists usually quibble about the loose change when the real d…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:35 PM
2

False accusations ruin men's lives and it's only getting worse. I'm not making the issue partisan, if you think the issue is partisan it's because the issue is partisan. On the one side we have innocent men, on the other, false accusers. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:10 PM
6

You don't think false accusations like these disproportionally affect men? What world do you live in, I would love to visit!
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:29 PM
2

Sorry about the Daily Fail link but archive.is isn't working for me.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:08 AM
2

I'm hoping he meant from a cannon... into a brick wall.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 11:05 PM
2

Wow, I wish 'John' the best of luck. It seems you need to have a mountain of evidence of bias against you as a man to even get the opportunity for a fair hearing. It's terrifying that this can happen. And does happen. And indeed is happening as we speak. I wonder if society will look back on these incidences the same way we look back on witch trials and the burning of catholics? Edit: As another thought. I wonder at what point we start looking at these rogue 'women's centres' the same way we loo…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 11:04 PM
1

Come on, lets be fair. She looks like Natalie Dormer after she's fallen from a yacht, drowned and been allowed to bloat for three days before being dragged from the ocean a pasty, bloated, corpse. I can almost see the crabs scuttling around inside her mouth.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:56 AM
4

Goodness, that's one of the most toxic things I've ever read.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 10:06 AM
35

Write to your local representatives and to the cinema itself. Make sure they know that you'll never attend another screening unless they apologise for their sexist and possibly illegal policy.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 10:31 AM

Micro-aggressions! So small nobody can prove they even exist! (and that's just how feminists like it.)
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:57 PM

Didn't stop them from slavering over her and exploiting her for all she was worth. Is that sensitive, or is it distastefully using an (assumed) victim to push a prior agenda? Weasel words, #SorryNotSorry
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:34 AM

Red Pill is for people who have zero experience in the real world, who apply specious logic to complex emotional situations, which cannot be understood through such mechanism.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:32 AM
61

Funny that she apologises to everybody except the people she falsely accused of rape, leading to a witchhunt and the banning of their entirely blameless organisation from campus. Weasel words.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:23 AM

Yet Rolling Stone's senior editors are unanimous in the belief that the story's failure does not require them to change their editorial systems. "It's not like I think we need to overhaul our process, and I don't think we need to necessarily institute a lot of new ways of doing things,"
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:56 PM

I wonder the extent to which she will accept responsibility for her failings. The decent thing to do would be to say 'I got it wrong, it was poor journalism'. I bet what we actually get will be shifting of blame and some grade A hamstering. If she doesn't try to turn this around and paint herself as a victim, my preconceptions of feminists everywhere will be suitably rocked.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:44 PM
5

Emma Watson's Alma Mater. Coincidence?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:43 PM
5

It's good that mainstream leftish newspapers like the Indy, (who are no strangers to the odd bit of feminist propaganda,) are running stories such as this with the title 'domestic violence' though.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:25 PM
8

In that case we should be extra-hard on him, seeing as it obviously works in getting him to say whatever you want him to say. Shame and berate him into agreement!
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:01 PM
2

Not all of them, and not in the Guardian. Some advertisers like Apple pay a flat rate to have ad space both in print and online. Every page view counts towards their revenues.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:43 PM

No because they use individual page views to ask for more revenue from their advertisers. It all counts to the bottom line.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:05 PM

I wonder when people will start getting it through their thick fucking skulls that linking to the Guardian justifies their decision to pursue these kinds of pathetic troll articles. Upvote for you, good person, bot or other.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:36 AM
1

Great comment from the comments section, wanted to share: THETRASHHEAP There is a massive biological element to male violence. Farm animals and domestic pets are neutered because of this. We can't do this with humans thankfully which means it must be socialised out. Society acknowledged this until post war a bunch of flat earthers decided gender was a social construct and removed many of the social constructs used to contain it, chivilry, family values, even sport in schools. We have a group of …
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:17 AM
11

It's illegal unless they're working private security or are hired as mercenaries by the country in question. To be honest, there's a very fine line between private security and mercenaries. Dodgy territory.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 08:23 AM
1

Here. I posted a link but I wanted to add text too, and it ended up only posting the text. It was an honest mistake, thanks for asking politely, unlike the other guy.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 08:17 AM
1

I'm no longer sure it's the right thing to do, bearing in mind the boy's family. I might write a letter to the local MP instead.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:33 PM
-2

lol, Meninism 101. Edit: Meninism = parody of Feminism, which is what the comment above is doing. It doesn't seem like people understand that.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:43 PM
1

I will gladly support a women's rights movement. Feminism is an ideological, sexist cult that has nothing to do with equality, or the real world in general. Never ask me to see eye to eye with a feminist, meeting even half way with those people would mean agreeing to live in a society that overtly despises men and boys and holds them to account unfairly for all the ill and none of the good in the world.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:12 PM
2

Just to add, personally I'm disillusioned left. I agree with the traditional politics of the left, but the increasing culture of hysteria, intolerance of dissenting opinion and most of all feminist hijacking has left me a bit out in the wilderness.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:25 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:11 AM
2

A study that was on here recently suggested about half of MRA were conservatives I think. The rest were a split between liberals and independents. A pretty broad spectrum.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:07 AM
0

It's because sociologists believe masculinity is taught, not something innate to men. It serves the dual purpose of allowing them to demonise men for perpetuating a 'culture' and excommunicate the women they don't like also. A bit like when feminists attack women who disagree with them with the claim that they've 'internalised the patriarchy'. It's just systematic bigotry masquerading as science imo.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:58 PM
1

It may be a joke but it's being used to demonise and oppress men and boys, and for that reason I have to consider it important.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:03 AM
1

Ok, so I suppose I'm going to have to repeat what sociologists have to say about masculinity, (the entire crux of this post), you might like to point out the positives because I can't seem to find any: One of the prominent behaviors is aggression in order to protect one’s reputation. An example of symbols used would be clothing.[35][40] Sociologist Michael Kimmel describes three cultures that support masculinity (especially in young men) in his 2008 book, Guyland: The Culture of Entitlement: Men…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:32 AM
2

Ah, I did the fatal mistake of lumping all rapes in the same, which does complicate things although they still include the entitlement to other one's body. Yes you did when it suited your argument, you mean. Women and men, all have masculine and feminine traits. Some are bad, some are good. Some are reinforced by other traits and other's (men and women) traits in social settings. Are we to understand that sociologists have redefined the meaning of masculine and feminine to mean 'whatever the fuc…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:17 AM
2

Power is a masculine trait. Rape is about power, an absolute power over someone's body and life. Women can also be masculine to the extreme end, so it doesn't completely deny female rapists. Women are in the rape spectrum too. This oft-cited claim could also be a myth actually, as this article by psychologist Nigel Barber, Ph.D. suggests. Possibly more misandrist propaganda spread to unfairly demonise men and boys and associate all men with the heinous crimes of a minority of people, both male a…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:58 PM
2

And if anybody is unconvinced, here's what Sociology of Gender has to say about 'Gender and Violence'. Gendered violence takes place within a socially constructed power dynamic in which one ideology (masculinity) dominates another (femininity). What it means to be a woman in society is influenced and ascribed by the media, which acts a “powerful educational force”. The media glamorizes violence against women cultivating a “toxic cultural environment” in which women are institutionally positioned…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:43 PM
3

Yes, I agree actually. Even the most cursory of glances at information about sociology will show you that it is indeed very wide-ranging and deals with much more than just gender theory. That's why I added the subtitle to my post (esp The Sociology of Gender). I actually think sociology is a ridiculously woolly subject; the more complex it gets, the more reductive it necessarily becomes. I do not think it's a proper science, and I think its conclusions have too much sway over influential people.…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:51 PM
3

Absolutely, I couldn't agree more. Where do you think Femnists are getting these ideas from if not studying Sociology of Gender? We're often criticised for tarring 'all' feminists with the same brush, so perhaps it would better serve to further our aims to target the science behind these ridiculous, revisionist claims instead?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:47 PM
2

Does it worry you at all that this theory puts every man in society on the 'rape spectrum?' That is to say, rather than defining rapists as criminal deviants, it defines them as at the extreme end of the masculinity spectrum, implying that rape is taught and reinforced by all men in society to a greater or lesser extent, whilst completely denying the existence of female rapists altogether? To me, that is a terrifying pathology due to its implications for how men are viewed as members of society.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:43 PM
2

That sounds really interesting, I shall certainly give it my full attention thanks. It's as if sociologists don't want humans to be glorified monkeys. More worryingly, it's as if Gender Sociologists want to redefine all men as intrinsically evil. What on earth is their motivation for this? How are they able to get away with it largely unchallenged and do their theories unduly influence societal institutions from our elected chambers, to the courts, schools and media?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:38 PM
3

Not to mention that it is this same social theory that denies men the right to be victims. According to social theory, sexism = power + prejudice. So we have the double-whammy of a theory which unfairly demonises all men for the reasons listed above, but also denies that they can suffer themselves. Surely we should be giving it more focus if we want to change attitudes to the issues faced by men and boys in our society?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:17 PM
1

Yeah, I understand now. Thanks for pointing that out and taking the time to engage, whatever else I may have previously intimated were my feelings. There's frankly no excuse for me to have behaved like such a petulant cretin, but that's never stopped me in the past I have to admit.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:06 PM
1

Once I realised I couldn't get the figures for minority on minority, I settled for overall trend, you can't really be any more specific than > or < when you don't have the nuanced data to look at.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:54 PM
1

The way I've treated the figures is actually highly biased against whites (by not taking into account the figures for minority on minority attacks), but they highlight the disparity nonetheless. I don't believe it's important whether the attacks are one per person, or the same people doing multiple attacks as these numbers will average themselves out across both demographics so as to be fair for both sides. I'm sorry the previous reply was so testy, I literally just got woken up by my neighbour …
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:52 PM
1

I understand this entire analysis is reductive and it is not meant to demonise any groups or argue that minorities do not face systematic discrimination in most walks of life, I firmly believe they do. It's just meant to highlight that went SJWs talk about whites as if they're they scum of the earth, it's highly likely that these people are individually more ideologically opposed to racism than the people they're alleged to be oppressing. It's simply another way of looking at the figures to chal…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:42 PM
1

(My other reply was spikey because I just woke up and misread what you'd written, sorry). This is working on the assumption that there are only white and Asian people in the UK. No it isn't, I specifically said I hadn't included the figures for Blacks who make up the next largest minority, and that it was just a cursory look at the figures. That doesn't change the conclusion at all. You have to take into account all non-whites and all non-asians as potentially being responsible for the 55000 plu…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:24 PM
6

I was just looking into this on a hunch and I found some interesting stats. Basically in the UK, there are 55,000,000 people who identify as 'White British' and 4,373,339 people who identify as Asian British (according to the 2011 census.) The stats on racial violence I found here suggest that between 2009/11 - 0.1% of White British suffered a racially motivated attack, whereas 2.9% of Asian British suffered a racially motivated attack in the same period. That equated to around 55,000 white peop…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:46 AM
2

I'm too upset with the Guardian to read anything they have to say. I grew up reading that paper and to see what the SJWs have done to it (and the left in general) galls me more than I can put into words. I will block the site on my computer however, I didn't actually think about that. Thanks for the tip!
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:34 AM
1

We agree that bi people suffer prejudice for being gay, as well as being bi, which means by default that they suffer more prejudice / oppression than someone who is simply gay. I don't agree that positive stereotypes offset prejudices however I'm afraid. It kind of comes across like you're diminishing the bi experience for no sound reason. Gay people suffer gay prejudice. Bi people suffer bi and gay prejudice. The bi experience is therefore subject to more prejudice. I don't understand how you'v…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:49 PM
1

I don't think it's fair to blame the sub for pms received from people who are subscribed. If this place was toxic, those people would have free reign in discussions, but they don't. If you aren't going to judge the sub by the submissions and the discussion, I can't take you seriously either tbh. A lot of us try so hard to be vigilant in calling out bullshit and misogyny when we see it here, because it reflects badly on the movement. For you to turn around and point to some shitty pms that may or…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:16 PM

IDK, she was pretty drunk, if there were witnesses she might at least spend the night in the tank which would discourage her from becoming violent in future. It would have still been the right thing to do regardless of outcome imo.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:06 PM

So what happened here is that the guy got hit by the girl before the video started, asked his mate to start filming and then baited her into hitting him again so he could retaliate and call it self-defence, with evidence. He should have just called the police after the initial attack. The way he's gone about things doesn't really cover him in glory. If he'd have retaliated after the first (off camera) hit, then fair enough, but engineering a situation where he encouraged her to hit him without g…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:49 PM
13

Special request than nobody links to the Guardian without using this. Don't let them profit from their blatant, cynical misandry. If you want to discuss what horrible bullshit they're coming up with on any given day, use the above archive and deny them the revenue for their bigotry.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:38 PM
3

Guys. The Guardian is a fake ideological left-wing publication that loses millions every year and is increasingly reliant on its internet service to justify its existence. It runs stories like this to get your hate clicks and interaction btl, which they will quickly moderate for having the temerity to politely disagree with the author in logical terms. The more people fall for this hate-click bullshit, the more likely they will be to do it again. DO NOT LINK DIRECTLY TO THE GUARDIAN. Don't give …
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:34 PM
1

I came to say the same thing. I usually check to see what I'm clicking on but this time I got caught out. Not happy.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:30 PM
1

I had the same talk actually, people just aren't accepting of bisexuality to the point that they argue it doesn't exist or that people who are that way inclined must be perverts or deviants. Positive stereotyping can also be pretty harmful, remember. That's one of the main reasons why I think TBGL is possibly more accurate than TGBL. There's less acknowledgement of bi people, and just because it's easier for them to fly under the radar, doesn't mean that they should have to. I'm just playing dev…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:58 AM
1

The woman's legal team still need to establish a case. A false rape accusation in Britain is extremely harsh, potentially more than an actual rape crime. Irrelevant and untrue. Both carry maximum life sentences, but only rapists ever actually receive the maximum. If you're the primary earner in your household and you have consensual sex with your partner, they can still successfully prosecute you for rape even if they give their assent to sex at the time. It exponentially increases the likelihoo…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:45 AM
1

Might as well just post the relevant changes: For the first time, toolkits will spell out situations where a potential victim may have been unable to consent due to incapacity through drink or drugs, for example, or where consent could not reasonably be considered to have been given freely due to the unequal relationship of the parties involved. For example, if the suspect held a position of power over the potential victim - as a teacher, an employer, a doctor or a fellow gang member. "It is not…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:31 AM
1

Not sure what you've been reading but the policy has essentially changed from 'no means no' to 'yes means yes' (unless we decide it doesn't). No, no longer comes into it I don't know where you got that idea. In the event of an allegation of rape men are assumed to be perpetrators unless they can prove otherwise. Men who are raped by women are doubly disadvantaged by this fact, as are women who enjoy drunk sex, who now cannot engage in it without being legally raped. Edit: That's a sector I aim f…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:13 PM
1

don't think feminism has that much of an influence. If it did, then a lot of these politicians would've really pushed the bankers who took a lot of risk. They didn't, the banks are still going at things as they did- with their salaries and all that. Read what I wrote again. I said they'll promise the earth as long as it doesn't cost them anything. That's why they court ideological feminist bullshit, without tackling anything of actual substance. Fictional wage-gap, tick. More women in science, t…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:06 PM
1

No, it's an increasing trend in the media. It is the reason Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg and Harriet Harman are coming out in the papers wearing pro-feminist t-shirts however. The politicians are so desperate to court the supposed 'left' vote (influenced by the pro-feminist media), without actually having to commit themselves to any actual leftist policies, that they're willing to debase themselves by taking a stand against made-up inequalities and issues that really couldn't matter less to the vast …
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:52 PM
1

There's a huge difference between power and influence. Having one sexist, feminist MP in Parliament is bad enough, two will be worse. The vast majority of women do not describe themselves as feminists, and yet the politics of the left is overrun with feminist-driven policies. The same is true of the left-wing media, and the bias runs all the way over to the centre-right. Even the Torygraph is running feminist articles these days. Their influence is already disproportionate to their membership, i…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:13 PM
4

I've been banging on about the Green's sexism for a while now. It's good in a way that this AMA has brought some attention to it. I hope someone calls Bennett out on it during the leaders debates. She needs to face public scrutiny for her sexist 'women first' policies. The sad thing is, I'm left of centre and I literally feel I have no one left to vote for between Liberal lies, Labour being shit and the Greens being massive sexists. I might as well destroy my ballot for all the choice that's lef…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:26 AM
13

Whilst that is good news, they fell hook, line and sinker for her follow up in which she re-stated the exact same thing, but in a less sexist sounding manner. Everyone needs to know of the disgusting sexist policies of this party of lying feminists.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:58 AM
7

I suggest you read both replies from 'TheGreenParty' which came 4 hours apart, then follow up by reading this. It's shocking that she actually seems to have gotten away with this obfuscation, but then she is a feminist and a politician. I imagine she must be an expert at lying by now.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:51 AM
25

"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." -George Bernard Shaw
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:52 PM
7

All I see is a black man slicing up a woman.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:49 PM
3

I agree, give it in reverse order of relative societal acceptance and persecution. TBGL by my reckoning. Possibly TGBL.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:42 PM
6

Where can I find this, uh... watermelon porn?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:40 PM
0

Because sex is shameful and girls should be virgins until their wedding day? Honestly, people like you make it so much easier for people like me to get laid. Thanks for everything brother.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:53 PM
2

He doesn't sound like a very 'nice guy' from the embittered article he penned. If I had a sister, I'd advise her to steer well clear.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:47 PM
3

I'm starting to think that the reason feminists invent things like 'mansplaining' and 'women only spaces' (barring crisis centres etc) is because secretly they feel inferior when on a level playing field and they hold it against us. It's a big generalisation, I know, but it does explain why feminists are so resentful and keen on promoting a wildly sexist ideology that blatantly confers a starting advantage to women, to the detriment of men.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:40 PM
2

I was just thinking about how a lot of radical feminists think that allowing transsexual women into womens' spaces is wrong while they welcome transsexual men with open arms. How do you guys feel about this? The same as I ever did, that radical feminists are disgusting bigots. Welcome aboard!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:22 PM
1

I wonder...
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:05 PM
1

In short what's said is "Gamer Gate stole our stolen car" I'm not very au fait with Wikipedia, or Gamergate for that mater, but this was my takeaway from his tiresome diatribe also.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:02 PM
3

Now why does that sound familiar... "'Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket."
/r/MensRights27/01/15 04:46 PM
2

"Have the Rolling Stones killed." "But Sir those aren't the..." "Do as I say!"
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:54 PM
1

Great parallel, I hope this takes off.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:30 PM
4

The sentient part might be a stretch.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:54 AM
1

I'm willing to accept that given your comments and OPs reply. I've elucidated my thought process in my reply to the OP. Not trying to stir up shit or offend anyone, something seemed off so I had to ask the question.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 10:34 PM
5

I always read that as, 'I'm too lazy/stupid to logically disagree, so I will launch into a pedantic belittling'. It's a shame the kinds of people who use it are literally too dumb to ever realise that all they've proved is their own vapidness.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:13 PM
1

Well at least somebody's paying us some attention, makes a nice change!
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:06 PM
12

Triggered.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:34 PM
45

Brilliant, I love this women for saying what a lot of people think but are too afraid of the feminazi backlash to come out in public and say. I'd like to see the nazi hordes try and bully or shame her into backtracking or an apology! I found this retweet on her twitter account. What an absolute legend!
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:51 PM
9

That first article is really good and he obviously knows and cares very much about the subject at hand. I can't believe he was fired for making such a sensible set of suggestions (actually in this hysterical feminazi-led media climate, I can). His suggestions include not allowing a drunken non-frat member of any sex into the party, not having sex with a drunk female and putting drunk females in taxis home (free of charge to the females). What a prick! /s
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:09 AM
1

She made the mistake of trusting in adults to do the right thing.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 04:04 PM
3

The Ched Evans case is complicated, I don't believe he is guilty of rape but he was found guilty because the jury believed he couldn't have reasonably believed the woman was in a fit state to offer consent and he himself was 'tipsy'. That's why the jury were able to find one man guilty and the other man innocent. The judge in that case made a point of saying that drunken consent is still consent. The irony of the whole thing is that people condemn Evans for maintaining his innocence and protesti…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:48 PM
6

Don't pick on the girl, re my other posts it's the teacher who threatened to call the police over a non-existent rape and denied the boy representation who is the only person at fault in this. He's driven an innocent lad to his death and he's the one who needs to suffer the consequences for his actions.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:01 PM
6

In an fb message to the girl involved just before he killed himself, Yale (the lad) told her that the teacher had told him he was going to get the police involved. (Teacher told lad he was going to contact the police over a possible rape). The teacher has denied saying that to coroner, but I don't believe that for a second. It isn't even true that a drunk woman can't give consent, he's got that from fucking Tumblr not English and Welsh law. Drunken consent is still consent in English law, so the…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:56 PM
8

I said the same thing the first time this story came out, but the new details are damning. The teacher questioned him without letting him have anybody to accompany him, incorrectly told him drunken women can't give consent and said he thought he was going to have to get the police involved. All because two teenagers both got drunk and fooled around. Two short hours after the interview in which the poor kid was threatened with rape charges by the schools 'Children's Officer', he went home and han…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:52 PM
7

That whole thing was just beautiful.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:42 AM
9

Jesus H Christ! I've heard about feminists trying to take over Wikipedia and always thought it must be kind of an exaggeration. What an absolute joke, why should women need protecting from men's opinions online unless they literally have nothing useful to say? You would think that gender was irrelevant and the it was quality of one's ideas that counted, but according to whichever cretin came up with this idea, women are weaker than men and need to be protected from their superiority by not allow…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:55 PM
1

They didn't say anything about gold digging, they talked about marrying down and gave a specific example of what they meant. Also, you can't talk about these issues without making generalizations, you've made plenty yourself, it's unacceptable for you to tell someone to stop making them just because you disagree with what's being said. If you think marrying down isn't an issue, I suggest you check out some dating profiles on various sites. Women routinely ask for men who have a good job / career…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:13 PM

I have a huge issue with the sexist terms above, but I also have an issue with the term 'bitchwording'. It would be great if these nasty, misandrist attacks on males had a word to define them for ease of rebuttal, but bitchwording is probably too charged. It'll just be used to make us look bad, and distract from the fact that terms like 'mansplaining' are horribly sexist and belie an underlying misandry.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:56 PM
1

Done.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 12:55 PM
1

Hyperbolic insinuations are not evidence. There isn't enough information to know what happened and until there is nobody can reasonably draw conclusions either way.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:17 AM
-2

You're still dealing in fantasies and speculation (probably based on past cases where this sort of thing has been proven to have happened.) The questions you need to be asking are. -Was the boy questioned without his parents? -What was he questioned about? -What were the girl's allegations? It's of no use to anybody getting hysterical about it whilst possessing none of the facts. I've already told you that if your hypothetical situation turned out to be true, I would be apoplectic with the injus…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:58 PM
-4

Because she thought she'd had sex. You're accusing feminists of conflating rape and sex but you're doing a pretty good job of that yourself. If you really care about men and boy's rights, you should avoid crying wolf and twisting facts to fit a narrative. Obfuscations like that are exactly why feminism is in the dire state that it's in right now. If any of the things you've claimed happened had actually happened, I would be up in arms about it. But they haven't, at least not to anybody here's kn…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:31 PM

You're talking fantasy, The article saying nothing about rape, or anybody accusing the boy of rape. We know nothing about the questioning, who was present and what was discussed and whether anybody was accused of anything. We also have no idea why the poor lad felt he had no other option but to end his own life. It could be completely unconnected to the incident. You're literally making things up to fit a narrative. A typical feminist trick that is beneath the dignity of this sub. EDIT: Maybe it…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:07 PM
1

Link to evidence please.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:07 PM
2

I don't think they are an MRA, they claim that 95% of the posts on the sub are anti-women and that the MRA is as bad as feminism. Also, it's a new account. I'd be more inclined to believe they weren't a troll or a reporter if they had an established track record on Reddit. As it is I call bullshit. Downvote and move on.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:47 PM

You'll have to elucidate, because I don't see what information you're basing this statement on? A girl said she may have had sex with a boy, named the boy, boy questioned by school, boy tragically committed suicide (possibly as a result). How did you draw your conclusions from the above facts?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:27 PM
2

The bizarre thing is, of all the ways you could justifiably attack the diseased cult of feminism, this among the least valid. I don't see many feminists arguing in favour of male circumcision, they just tend not to give much of a fuck or grudgingly oppose it with the caveat that it isn't as bad a female circumcision. It's a new account, could be a false flag or troll. Certainly hasn't been made by a friend to the Men's Rights movement, whatever their intentions.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:34 PM
22

I can't find it listed as a British Charity and there's no charity number that I can see on their website, so I think they must be independent. Complaining to and about the hospital is probably the best bet, keeping it logical and civil at all times of course. We aren't feminists after all.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:21 PM
3

If you look at the reaction on this thread and where the upvotes have gone, I think we've done a pretty good job of self-policing and I think that is true more generally also. Not worth getting worked up about really.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:52 AM
5

They actually have, but it doesn't say it's the 'only' one like with the prostate cancer drug they're axing. Meanwhile, Eisai has been informed that its breast cancer therapy Halaven will no longer be paid for by the fund. It seems like a pretty complicated issue that won't be understood without looking at the efficacy of the individual drugs against a cost / benefit analysis.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:26 PM
0

Greens are the most feminist of all the major(ish) parties, so they're a no go. Their leader is Natalie Bennett: Bennett, who has considered herself a feminist since she was a young child, founded the Green Party women's group and was a trustee of the Fawcett Society between 2010 and 2014. -Wikipedia A horrible choice for anyone committed to egalitarianism or Men's Rights. EDIT: If you disagree with my assessment ask yourself this question. Imagine Nigel Fararge started a UKIP 'Men's Group', exc…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:27 PM
3

It also serves to undermine the cult of victimisation dominant in western feminist ideology that women are victims of the mythical patriarchy, upheld by men to keep them subservient. Until feminists recognise that men suffer equally (if not more) from sexism in society, articles like this will be needed to help redress the balance and to remind people that being male is not a privilege in it's own right, and equally being female is not a hindrance. Indeed the issues facing the disenfranchised in…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 04:16 PM
2

Inhumane. Why would you treat somebody you care about in such an offhand, emotionally callous manner? Relationships as gender war. It's pathological.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:01 PM
8

It helps dispel the myth of universal male privilege, totally a male rights issue. Combating feminist propaganda and outright lies is one of the biggest challenges facing this movement.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:58 PM
1

I feel like I didn't make up a position for you, but rather exaggerated your implication that any article talking about domestic abuse must mention men and women in equal measure. That was never my implication, exaggerated or depreciated. That's what I've been trying to explain. My implication is that there is (almost) never an article about male victims of domestic violence in the mainstream media, they're all about female victims which conforms to the feminist narrative that men are perpetrato…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 01:32 AM
5

Not every article ever needs to acknowledge men. Agreed 100%, if you want to check back you'll find I never said (or implied) they do. I think you're giving TheresanotherJoswell's strawman more credence than it deserves. That is never, and has never been my position. The issue I am trying to highlight is the marginalisation of male victims of domestic violence. This article is just a drop in the ocean. I appreciate that you think it's worthless clickbait, but as far as I'm concerned it's an insi…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 12:42 AM
5

Somewhere around 40% of victims of domestic violence are male. How often do you see a news article or a government speech acknowledging male victims? And how often is violence against women highlighted by the media, government and even the UN? The marginalisation of male victims of domestic violence is a men's rights issue, whether you want it to be or not. What bias do you have against these men who have to suffer in silence, without the support network enjoyed by women who suffer the same issu…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 08:09 PM
3

The article makes the claim that women are paid less for doing the same job, but uses mean salaries to make that assertion. It does not say what other contributory factors are involved, such as hours worked, performance related bonuses, experience, shift differentials, and all the other things we know contribute towards total salary. It's the same argument we see time and time again to support the unproven allegation that women are paid less than men for doing the same job. It offers no evidence…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:59 PM
9

That's what the feminists I've had the misfortune to try and debate will never understand in their rigid beliefs. Truth is born of argument. If your theories or beliefs can not stand up to being rigorously challenged by logic, they're worth nothing and you need to adapt them. Hell that's how I went from sympathising with a lot of feminist ideas to being dead against them. I had a lot of debates and I came to realise my position on many things was rationally indefensible. Without constant questio…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:39 PM
6

The article makes the violence seem consensual. There's nothing wrong with consensual violence even if you don't happen to approve. Some people enjoy a good bit of fighting, more power to them.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:28 PM
2

Yeah, I've noticed that before. Hermione also physically assaults Ron in book 6 (for hurting her feelings), so there's a domestic violence charge against her too. I really enjoy the books and films for a bit of escapism, but if some Tumblr SJWs want to over-analyse things, they might find the facts don't fit their victimisation narrative quite as nicely as they would like them to.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 11:49 AM
5

Just another excuse to attack all men by association, nothing to see here except blatant misandry masquerading as social justice.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:11 AM
3

I agree, it comes across as hateful and reductive. Some of the facts seem valid, but this is not how I would chose to present them.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:04 AM
4

I think you shouldn't be so touchy, try to understand that sarcasm doesn't carry well over text and try to engage your friend in a non-judgemental discussion, explaining your feelings and the reasons behind them. If at the end of all that they still feel that violence against men is not an issue, by all means judge them. But you haven't even given them a chance, you've just flown into a temper for little apparent reason and caused a drama.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:02 AM
1

You're absolutely correct to be sceptical of this study, I am too. What cannot be denied is the hypocrisy in the analysis however, which is really the main reason I posted it. The fact that gay man are said to earn less is an important issue to consider too, but as with you I am highly sceptical of such claims.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:30 AM
5

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." This is progress.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:56 AM
6

Or just not enter into such bigoted, idiotic logic to begin with.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:13 PM
1

Western feminists are exactly as bad as I think. It isn't ignorance that drives me to make these remarks, but repeated experience.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:42 AM
6

As someone who resides mostly on the left politically but with a mind of my own, I grew extremely weary of the constant anti-male barrage of western feminists in the media. This led me to get into debates and do independent research and my worldview changed significantly over the course of a few months. I went from buying into the feminist propaganda about the (debunked) wage gap etc to seeing it for the lies and obfuscations that it actually was. To my surprise, I ended up coming to the conclus…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:14 PM
5

There are no winners from this situation. A tragic, sad story.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 08:22 PM
2

Exactly. Apparently Leonardo DaVinci injured himself quite badly testing out one of his flying machines. Had he died, he would have been a candidate. A freak accident in 1903 and the Wright brothers could have joined him. There will always be people willing to take risks and push the boundaries of what is possible. Some will be lunatics without a hope of success, others will end up changing the world.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:55 PM
2

It also goes firmly against the democratic principle of innocent until proven guilty. A totalitarian measure which I'm surprised has gotten the traction that it has.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 08:19 AM
3

I've seen this story with a similarly misandric headline in at least six pretty major publications so far. The truth is they'd never get away with saying the same thing about women (using analogously spurious stats), so what makes it OK to say it about men? I'm not offended by the articles as such, more by the heinous double-standards.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 08:15 AM
8

I wish I hadn't clicked on that link, I used to read the Guardian every day but I stopped when it belatedly dawned on me it is the most sexist major news publication out there. It's only worth looking at if you want to see what lies and obfuscations the radical career-feminazis are coming out with on any given day. I refuse to give them the traffic but I bet there isn't anything mentioning the latest 6/1000 campus sexual assault stat. They ignore the evidence that doesn't fit in with their man-h…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:21 PM
-2

Sure. It doesn't matter what I put in front of you, you'll just dismiss it. Wikipedia for example, does not allow primary research to go into it's articles and therefore it's sources are naturally referring to articles that are quoting the primary research (which according to you is not evidence). Nothing is perfect, but if you're determined to bury your head in the sand, don't let facts stand in your way. So as I said, cool story bro.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:18 PM
-2

Cool story bro.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 09:55 PM
4

It would be brilliant if all feminists were so overtly hateful instead of acting out their malice towards males with made-up issues such as rape-culture. It would make it a lot easier for people to see them for what they were. As it is a lot of feminists genuinely believe they are the reasonable ones whilst spreading their sexist anti-man dogma and perpetuating the female = victim, male = perpetrator narrative.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 09:53 PM
-1

There are plenty of sources out there, even Wikipedia has a entry on the subject.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:45 PM
2

Well I can't argue with your own personal experience, but it certainly isn't the same as mine.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:45 PM
6

The vast majority of women aren't feminists though, thank god. Feminists will bash men over anything, because modern day feminism relies on perpetuating the cult of victimhood. You shouldn't hate women for the actions of a significant minority of bigots.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:11 PM
15

The post says nothing about feminists criticising anybody though?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:43 PM
36

What part of this has anything to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:27 PM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:15 PM
26

Poor guy, I'm glad his ordeal is (mostly) over. It's a shame he's not going through with the court case to sue the shit out of this horrible narcissistic fantasist for what she's put him and his family through, but he seems like a decent guy who is just happy have his name cleared.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:12 PM
9

I second this and I find it bizarre that hork23 would make such an easily refutable claim.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:08 PM
6

I don't buy the feminist bullshit that every woman portrayed in the media is a role model for all women, any more than I buy into the opposite about men. It's a stupid cartoon, get over it.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:44 AM
3

This is so specious it makes my brain ache with sorrow.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:34 AM
8

Made-up victimisation of any kind will do the trick tbh.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:08 AM
8

Poor guy, this woman is absolute scum. The lowest of the low. There is nothing and no one she would not exploit to further her pathetic career. I hope Barry sues the shit out of her.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:47 AM
4

Consequences or no, it's a barbaric ancient practice that has no place in the modern world.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter