TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Elim101 Archive

View 2 posts and 95 comments by Elim101 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
65

Red Pill ExampleElim101/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 05:07 AM
3

Elim101/r/askTRP26/10/15 12:57 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Use the "good school system" excuse. Find a nearby town that's not too close that they can just waltz in whenever they feel like it and that has a good school system, and say that you're moving there for the kid. Also, check out the laws for common law in your state. You may still be on the hook for "spousal support" even though you didn't get married.
/r/askTRP02/08/16 02:37 AM
2

Not everyone would rape and murder just because it was allowed or even encouraged That's the exact same line of reasoning as NAWALT. And the response to it is exactly the same.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 09:22 PM
53

He made a general statement, not a specific one. Pay attention. And yes, if you, he, or I had been born a Mongol, we would do Mongol shit.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 04:47 AM
1

You do realize that she can't be both down-to-earth and narcissistic at the same time, right? Those are contradictory qualities. My money is on the latter being true, and the former is the rose-colored glasses.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 02:44 AM
2

Aye, and the costs of both will undoubtedly increase.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 06:51 AM
2

The cost of raising a child is around $250,000. That'll get you roughly 5 years in a nursing home @ $4,000/month.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/16 04:20 PM
1

And it does. Care to find some examples of where it doesn't? The problem is recently-unplugged, anger-phase children who can't yet appreciate the expertise in front of them.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 05:43 PM
15

This idea that every man has to individually evaluate and determine whether someone is qualified to give him advice is absurd and bizarre. Try the alternative: recognizing that there are other men who are better at determining who is qualified than you, and trusting them (and then verifying) when they say "this guy knows his shit." This extreme form of skepticism is what leads to people to all sorts of crazy ideas, like thinking that vaccines cause autism. They go online, read some pseudo-scient…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 05:39 PM
16

There's a reason why most advertisers' primary target demographic is middle-aged women.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 09:28 PM
2

Congratulations on completely missing the point, while simultaneously strengthening OP's point. If you want to find actual misogyny, you can find it in these countries like Afghanistan and India where women are treated like property. In comparison, whiny feminists in the West complain about the equivalent of not getting as many sprinkles on her ice cream as the other kid.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 03:01 AM
0

Yes, I am aware of this, as I am also Muslim :) Both are perfectly valid reasons.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 07:18 PM
3

British men are not going to be marrying muslim women and converting to their religion. I have seen American men do exactly this. British women that fall in love with muslim men (fatties) will convert to islam to allow for marriage Actually, they don't have to. It works the other way around in Islam; Muslim men can marry non-Muslim women, but not the other way around. Makes sense when you consider that the man is supposed to be the leader of the family.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 01:01 AM
1

Islam is uniquely war like and accepting of violence. Completely false. Islamic just war theory is well-developed.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 12:57 AM
1

Good stuff. Thanks.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 01:41 AM
1

Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen the Spain one before. Scary stuff.
/r/askTRP26/10/15 04:36 AM
1

Thanks but this wasn't really a debate between me and the friend. He's mainly RP already but wanted more info.
/r/askTRP26/10/15 01:58 AM
1

It's not about convincing myself; I already know it's a bad idea. After that conversation, now I'm curious about what other reasons there are.
/r/askTRP26/10/15 01:07 AM
10

They don't. She's just arguing that she can't/won't file for divorce because she's Muslim. It's a nonsense position, because if she really were following Islam, she wouldn't try to kick her husband out.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 03:15 AM
2

You misunderstood, or perhaps forgot, the point. The actual physical action of sex isn't what damages a person; it's sex with multiple partners. You're choosing to ignore biology. When people have sex, there is a release of a chemical called oxytocin, the "bonding chemical." Bonding with someone and then breaking that bond is psychologically damaging to a person, and sex isn't the only way it can happen. Regardless of the means, the ability to bond with a partner starts disappearing, the same wa…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 09:32 PM
1

Or it could be because I've seen evidence to that effect. This one too. Spare me the "double standard" argument. I'm against men doing it as well.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 07:01 AM
7

Damn I should've thought of that. Good one.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:54 AM
2

It's offensive...so what? It's reality that it damages women. Reality doesn't care if you're offended, just as reality doesn't care if people deny climate change; it's happening.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:44 AM
12

Nonsense. Our entire society is built around considering the needs of women. We don't need to do it, too. If they have effectively priced themselves out of the dating market, it's their job to fix it. Or get a cat.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:25 AM
2

This is an attempt by her to impose her frame. The purpose of appearing "semi-disabled," as you put it, is to set up a frame of "I don't do X, Y or Z, so you will have to do it instead." Clearly, she succeeded in imposing this frame with your buddy, if she's trying to impose it on you as well.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 01:28 AM
3

Follow the two-thirds rule. Reciprocate 2/3 of whatever she gives you.
/r/askTRP23/08/15 05:26 AM
1

Since women naturally have a higher body fat %, the 135lb male fighter would have a significant muscle advantage, even though they are technically the same weight. She would have to fight a 125lb male for that advantage to disappear. I would love watching Mighty Mouse tear her apart.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 09:20 PM
1

You just said the same thing I said, (both are above average for their respective gender) and then said that this goes against my point, which is that there's no contest between a male and female unless the female is vastly better trained/much higher percentile than the male. Work on your reading comprehension, pal.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 09:18 PM
2

She's above average size for a (athletic) female, he's above average size for a (athletic) male. The fact that they are roughly in the same percentiles for their respective genders, and that this shows how it's not much of a contest in such a situation, is telling.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 04:52 PM
1

what does that come from? Google let me down.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 03:09 PM
2

Women being attracted to power/status is not conditioning, it's innate. Wearing a suit would be a way of communicating that you have that power/status. They're not attracted to the suit any more than I am attracted to a bra. No matter how much you try to encourage a woman to fight these tendencies, people know innately what vulnerabilities are signs of weakness (e.g. crying because someone made fun of you) and which ones are faux-vulnerabilities (the example above about the puppies is right on).…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 03:08 PM
1

Care to provide examples of that happening here? Mods banning people for disagreement, perhaps? Or is this just an abstract, borderline-concern trolling post?
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 02:01 AM
11

You think this is about ideologies and giving/accepting messages? No. This is biological programming. One key RP maxim is that you can not negotiate desire. A woman will not be more attracted to a man because he shows his vulnerabilities, no matter how many tumblr memes and 90s movies she sees.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 01:55 AM
-2

I'm in a similar position to you. You can do all of that (and I plan to) without getting legally married, thus eliminating the need for a pre-nup. Look into whether your state/country has alternative arrangements, such as "domestic partnerships."
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 06:14 PM
1

This concept comes from Athol Kay's "Married Men Sex Life," a good resource for men who find TRP after they are already married.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 03:07 AM
194

"I ask not for a lighter burden, but for broader shoulders. I ask not for an easier path, but for stronger feet. I ask not for weaker enemies, but a stronger me. Let life do with us what it wants, but let us be strong enough to handle it."
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 12:56 AM
2

We can argue semantics about what counts as a philosophy until the cows come home, but more importantly, your description of what the Red Pill is invalidates his whole section on "Red Pill Relationships," which is what I was criticizing. This guy has done an impressive, indeed, rather admirable, job of stealthily inserting in several of the sidebar's "shaming tactics" by starting off his post with a criticism of BPers. He refers to RP relationships as "manipulation" and "abuse." The fact that he…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 11:25 PM
1

The "Red-Pill Relationships" section reads more like, "what happens when a PUA gets in an LTR." PUA stands at one side of the Red Pill spectrum (MGTOW at the other), but it does not define TRP. LTR is an underdeveloped part of TRP philosophy, and it certainly would be useful to develop it more, but you have to understand the terminology that you're using, first. Rollo Tomassi is perhaps the top theorycrafter when it comes to RP philosophy, and the author would do well to read more of his work to…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 06:58 PM
17

I upvoted this because now I know how to peel stickers! (But seriously, good metaphor)
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 06:34 PM
54

Yeah, and then when the ground chuck finds out that the beef in another country is grass-fed and tastes even better for half the price, watch her head explode.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 05:25 AM
3

So, basically : "Hide it under the carpet until it disappears" ? Nope, that's not what "no validation" means. It means don't sleep with them, don't compliment them, and most certainly don't LTR them. Doing these things makes them think that they made good life choices. It's our role, as rational minds, to educate those who are willing to learn. This post is here to discuss between male of the best way to "treat" this "issue". The best way to treat the issue is to do as I said above: treat them a…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 06:01 PM
36

Career women - these so-called "alpha females" - are dysgenic. Just like with fatties, we shouldn't validate these women in any way, or all we do is encourage the behavior. As for your question: what kind of advice should we give to these women ? Absolutely none. This is a male space. We give advice to men. Send it over to RPW and let them sort it out.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 09:49 AM
2

You're in a similar place to where many of us have been. I'll bet a lot of new guys who have just come to the sub feel the same way. Read more. Lift more. Work on your frame. Absorb the collective wisdom of this sub, and eventually (not right away) things will turn around.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 07:41 AM
3

Notice how there is no "non-sexist" category of men in this article. The implication is that all men are either "hostile sexists" or "benevolent sexists." This is precisely why the only way to win is to not play - engaging with these people puts you in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" position.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 08:54 AM
1

The author of that first link gets one thing right: Our social system has sought to divide human qualities between men and women, instructing boys that they are naturally intelligent, logical, objective, active, independent, forceful, risk taking, and courageous. The qualities encouraged in girls have been a different set: sensitivity, emotional responsiveness, obedience, kindness, dependence, timidity, self-doubt, and self-sacrifice. What you should be as a man, and what you should look for in …
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 08:25 PM
4

While reading the article, I noticed a link to this story and checked it out: http://www.sunnyskyz.com/happy-videos/1797/Adam-Levine-And-Maroon-5-Drive-Across-L-A-Crashing-Weddings-For-Their-New-Music-Video Before TRP, this would have given me all sorts of happy feelz. After TRP, all I can think about is: I bet every one of those brides wanted to get with Adam Levine.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 03:35 AM
3

Yeah, because human beings are rational actors who always make decisions that are in their best interest, with all the facts known! /s
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 09:51 PM
4

It's one thing if you fight or kill another man, that would seem to indicate strength. Doing the same to a girl, would not.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 06:11 PM
1

It sounds like you've done right by yourself and her. The thing about spinning plates is that eventually they fall. As some other posters have said, a year is pretty good, though.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 07:16 AM
6

There is no "friendzone with sex." The very definition of the friendzone is that you aren't getting any. This would be FWB, but you say that she wants more than that. Well, more than that is a "relationship." It sounds to me like she guessed - correctly - that if she used the word "relationship" you would next her, so she's proposing a relationship without calling it that.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 04:17 AM
16

What I find to be the most interesting thing about this story is the way that it is reported. Notice the headline: "Jimmy Fallon found out he blew his chance to date Nicole Kidman." This implies that Nicole Kidman (at the time a late 30s/40ish actress with children from a previous marriage) is higher SMV than Jimmy Fallon (at the time an early 30s comedian, a rising star whose career is on an upwards trajectory). Fallon was nearing his prime, and is currently in it. He's hosting the Tonight Show…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 05:37 AM
2

South Park had an episode with exactly this.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 04:17 AM
4

Watching the 2010 show through an RP lens is an absolute cringe-fest. "Who wears the pants in the relationship?" 2 guys say she does, third rather weakly says him. Audience cheers for each of the guys who says "she does." All three of the women say that they are in charge, which the largest of the three being the most confident and outspoken with her answer. Regardless of who is answering the question, the default assumption appears to be that the man is the one who is wrong. On the plus time, a…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 09:16 PM
2

The type of women who I tend to assume are virgins (and am interested in, of course): Have a religious upbringing. This doesn't mean mentioning faith every 5 seconds; if a girl even mentions it once or twice in a conversation, that's more than 95% of women. Demure personality, without being painfully awkward. Do not wear revealing/tight clothing, particularly tops. It seems like virtually all younger women wear tight pants these days, so I had to give up on using that as a clue.
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/14 02:19 PM
3

You're not alone in this. A man says what he means and means what he says. Trolling is weak and pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 02:53 AM
1

You're more likely to get the truth from people with anonymous surveys. There are many methods for getting people to be more honest, including not making it obvious that this was what they were really testing. The survey could have had 20 questions on it, with these being the only two that they actually cared about.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 01:36 AM
2

You left out the kicker: The kid ain't his.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/14 11:28 PM
6

The ad is deliberately vague. The problem is that it can be interpreted as either or both. If you think that SJWs won't try to turn it into what the above comment is saying, then you haven't been paying attention to how feminists operate.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 06:36 AM
200

Financial Abuse: When the man who makes the money insists that he should be the one deciding how it gets spent.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 05:29 AM
2

Consider the possibility that you may think they are trading down, but they may not see it that way. Many factors go into determining a woman's perception of a man's value.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 06:32 AM
2

This is not a "response," it's a supplement. You touch on a few parts of RP theory that the OP didn't get to, but nothing you say in here is actually contrary to the post. In fact, most of it is just rephrasing the original post.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 06:50 AM
0

The same thing we say every night, Pinky: try to take over the world!
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 04:15 AM
6

I thought the same thing, that it was related to socioeconomic status. It would be worth a look. As far as the current debate goes, however, the causal mechanism doesn't matter. Feminists want to paint college campuses as places where rape is inherently more likely to occur, and these stats debunk that claim.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 06:56 PM
2

Once more, Reddit holds immense influence with the same impressionable young men set to become boyfriends, husbands, and fathers...Hosting such poison as TRP allows the dangerous mentality present there to infect its largest audience. Translation: We don't want men to know about TRP because it is threatening to the Feminine Imperative. We want docile, submissive beta boyfriends, husbands and fathers.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 06:41 PM
4

Then look up the study. If you can't find it, contact the author(s). I did this once, they even gave me access to their dataset, under the condition that if I ever used it I gave them credit.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 08:12 PM
5

TRP "generally differs from that" because statistical evidence shows that women with more partners are more likely to be unhappy and unfaithful. You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but we'll base ours on facts.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 05:36 AM
3

Yes, women can improve. The "Red Pill Women" sub is for that. Go there and ask them how.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 05:45 PM
1

Their phones are their hobby.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 12:35 AM
1

While this is an informative read and useful for some purposes, it assumes that men here rate women (or ought to rate women) on a normal distribution. That's not what I mean when I assign a score of 1-10, nor do I think it is what most men mean. (This rating scale was largely taken from a website that I can't find right now. I found it just about spot-on) 1-4: WNB. Whether she is a 1 or a 4 is largely academic. It ultimately doesn't matter. 5: Borderline. Maybe interested, but wouldn't show her …
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 03:33 AM
3

I agree with all of your post except for the inclusion of the job creation line. If anything "creates" jobs, it's demand. I plan on starting my own business soon and I know full well that I won't be "creating" any jobs. I will be employing people because their skills make me more money. If they do not make me more money, I will not employ them. "Job creation" sounds like the business is doing the worker and the economy a favor. In capitalism, the business owner looks out for no one but himself. …
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 10:02 PM
1

Tattoos are a form of body mutilation, so yes. And you're a terrible troll.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 03:09 PM
1

The conclusion that risk-seeking behaviors (and, for that matter, many other behaviors) are perceived differently based on sex is part of evolutionary psychology. Read the sidebar. If it is a "prejudice" to point out that biological differences manifest in actions and perceptions, then I am proudly prejudiced on this matter.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 06:24 AM
2

You're adopting an MRA-type of frame with this argument (Men and women are equal/similar). Just as men and women are attracted to different things, their actions can also have different meanings. In this case, risk-seeking behaviors for males is perceived as positive, while risk-seeking behavior in females is perceived as negative. While I am personally opposed to all tattoos (unless you come from a culture in which it holds some special traditional meaning), the conclusion that men with tattoos…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 11:38 PM
0

Being pro-circumcision is like a Jew fighting for the Nazis? Tell that to the people of Sub-Saharan Africa.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 03:05 AM
3

Yes, you're right. About 3 or 4 years back, I was strung along by a girl for several months. Spent many days after that looking for anything online that could help me understand it. Found some stuff that made some sense, but nothing like the resources that we have available today. I am opposed to a blanket prohibition. Perhaps a better approach would be to determine which types of guys are more likely to be receptive to TRP. That way, someone who wants to help a friend will know whether it's lik…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 05:58 AM
6

I'm going to disagree. My friend's brother discovered TRP, found out over the course of several months that it worked, and then told my friend and I about it. I'm grateful to the guy; I felt like I had a bunch of puzzle pieces, but had never been shown the picture on the box. Now I knew how to put it all together. There's an important difference between telling people about TRP indiscriminately (which will certainly cause you problems) and helping out a few intelligent, open-minded people.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 04:26 AM
2

Good argument, and I hope some people will actually listen to you. A few quibbles: Seeing as how around 25% of men in the US, and the majority worldwide, are not circumcised, I wouldn't go so far as to say that not doing it makes one an outcast. As for the 'how can amputation be better than not-amputation, ever?' I'm quite happy that the doctor removed the sixth fingers that I was born with.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 04:15 AM
1

Oh, the irony! OP posts about how a guy gets downvoted to oblivion for an unpopular opinion. A redditor in this comment section posts his opinion on circumcision. Gets downvoted into oblivion. Come on TRP, we're supposed to be better than that.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 03:15 AM
2

What a mess. He sounds like Cyril from Archer.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 05:15 PM
1

If it is not about this, then the only thing that remains (seeing how the whole post is about sex, including OP's own relationship) is his assertion that the PUAs he knows are "Not right in the head." This statement is so vague that this post becomes meaningless, if it is not referring to sexual strategy. Perhaps the OP will clarify what he meant. P.S. The insult is very un-TRP. I wouldn't downvote you for disagreeing with me, but I will for that.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 03:31 AM
3

TRP is not monolithic; while some guys are anti-marriage, some of us are looking for LTRs.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 12:11 AM
49

It's only a disadvantage if women know/can tell. That's why blue pillers like this are messed up. A guy who internalizes the Red Pill and adopts an abundance mentality is not at a disadvantage regardless of his past.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 11:37 PM
-6

Actually, liberals are the ones arguing that circumcision is bad. The northern European countries are the ones trying to ban it. There are benefits to circumcision, particularly a reduction in the likelihood of transmission of STDs.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 07:22 PM
1

This is well written and thought-provoking. It sounds a lot like the arguments made by Atavisionary, which I just discovered a few days ago. It's one thing to argue that sexual strategy is amoral empirically, but we should not leave it as such; we should examine the normative implications, as well.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 07:53 AM
6

For a random guy, or even a friend, it may not be worth it to introduce them to TRP, but this is your brother. Explain to him the following: 1) You're not going to get this girl, or any other girl you want, by doing what you do. 2) I know how you can. You know your brother better than anyone else here, so I'll leave the exact wording to you. You may be better off starting off with a few pointers of the "don't be unattractive" variety, so that at the very least he doesn't mess up in the near futu…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 07:52 AM
1

The way that a Muslim man is supposed to act with his wife is quite Red Pill: mostly alpha, with a decent mix of beta.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 01:57 AM
1

Exactly how many people in the West have been killed by "Islamists?" Now, compare that number to the number of people who have been killed by gang violence in just one major American city, such as Chicago.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 01:56 AM
2

You need to develop the mentality (i.e. frame) that there is no such thing as "the doghouse." Your house is yours. Your bed is yours. If she does not want you in the same house/bed as her, then she can go.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 03:46 PM
6

About 5 years ago, I show up at a girl's place for a 2nd date. She answers the door in a low-cut top and short shorts, says "oh, I forgot! Why don't you come in?" Beta-Elim thinks that she's going to get dressed so we can go out (boring dinner-and-movie plan). Instead she lies on her bed and says, "why don't we watch some TV?" She proceeds to snuggle up to me, tells me that I smell good, etc. And guess what? I didn't do anything, because I wasn't feeling comfortable. I told my friend this story …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 02:53 AM
1

Be careful, my friend, as you're treading very close to a strawman fallacy. There's a big difference between the OP's situation and the examples that you gave: reasonableness/likelihood. Considering how the parents kept calling, it's reasonable to assume that someone could come to check on her or that she could wake up and feel guilty. The likelihood of dying in a car crash or getting assaulted doesn't even come close to the likelihood that OP could end up in a mess. We accept reasonable risks i…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 02:14 AM
7

You missed the point. That girl's problems will become his problems, if the she says the wrong thing or the wrong person shows up.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 02:47 PM
7

You were doing so well, and then you had to throw in the anti-vaccine line!
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 11:13 PM
2

In graduate school, I had a professor who warned us against "concept stretching," which is the tendency by people to expand the definition of a term until it starts to mean everything (and, therefore, nothing). Within the article that you cite, there is nothing to support including physical attacks in the category of "shit tests." I'm not saying that your advice is bad; let's just be careful with our usage of terms.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 02:30 AM
1

This issue is explained by the documentary "Hjernevask." Check the sidebar under "Gender Studies is Nonsense." He notices the same difference between the West and Third-World countries, and has a convincing explanation.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 01:49 AM
2

Good for you, man! Not to bring you down, but I do have a nitpick: a good bowl of hookah should last 3-4 hours, not 2. A coal (I'm assuming it's instant) lasts about an hour, and you should use 3-4 per bowl, depending on the size of the bowl. Once the smoke gets weaker, go to the front and get another instant coal, then use your current coal to light it (off the bowl). Place the new coal next to the old one, and repeat, going around the edge of the bowl. This will give you maximum smokage. Also,…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 06:21 PM
0

I largely agree with your argument, but would modify it as follows: Women, over the course of thousands of years of evolutionary selection, have defined what is masculine. Men, over the course of thousands of years of evolutionary selection, have determined what is feminine. Culture does not trump biology. We have seen one example after another on this sub of how attempts by feminists to redefine what is masculine have failed. The most rabid feminist still goes crazy for the Alpha Male, not the …
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 04:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter