TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ElliotsSecondAscent Archive

View 1 post and 158 comments by ElliotsSecondAscent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It is a false equivalency because there is no fucking NEED to shave it. You NEED to keep healthy because you NEED to survive ffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 11:45 PM
1

Your 99.9% you keep repeating is something you can't back up and speak of it like it's a fact. Secondly, your source is retarded. It talks about native Americans as if they are all the same while there are many different tribes with different customs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 11:43 PM
1

From what I am reading online, that's a route a lot of these aboriginals take to get rid of their beard/pubic hair. Link?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:56 PM
1

Furthermore, if only pure bred native Americans have this little hair, dont you think you're limiting yourself by claiming to only want women who don't have to shave? They are not the only ones. The same counts for certain peoples in Asia and Africa. I mean, that would be like me saying I only wanna be with men who don't smell bad / don't have bad teeth, BUT ALSO never shower and never brush their teeth because they should just "naturally" be so clean. False equivalency, teeth and skin need to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:54 PM
1

There's just no literature on human body hair among ethnicities. https://youtu.be/ilmpJlboh6Q Look carefully, they don't have body hair. Not even pubic hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:21 PM
1

Not at all, there are plenty. I think you are projecting your own experiences of not knowing any people like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 08:47 PM
2

See my second comment in this chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 04:01 PM
1

Just repeating it again doesn't make you right.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:45 PM
3

Prefences can only emanate when when a certain standard of looks has been reached.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:39 PM
2

https://labs.la.utexas.edu/langloislab/face-perception/maxims-myths-of-facial-beauty/ You must live in great delusion if you truly believe "looks are in the eye of the beholder".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:29 PM
2

Of course I don't. Watch your implications. It's other words for whom women are more likely to select as a mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:15 PM
2

Wrong about what? Where did I say anything like women are sexually attracted to money? You're making yourself look stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:12 PM
2

And why is that? People live different lives in different circumstances. Who are you to say that height for a certain person isn't the deciding factor for his celibacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:10 PM
1

Your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:08 PM
2

Women generally like taller men. What the hell has this to do with projection or cognitive dissonance for that matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:01 PM
2

It's not about her opinions. First of all looks are not in the eyes of the beholder. That's simply a false statement. Second of all, just saying you don't care about wealth doesn't mean you aren't attracted to it. Some poor ugly cunt may marry another poor ugly dude due to circumstances but that doesn't mean she isn't attracted to wealth. Just like it's fair enough to say every human is looking for the optimal mate that ensures survival of her/his offspring, it's fair enough to say that every wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 02:57 PM
5

Lol, yes. People can totally tell that from my personality because I praise Elliot Rodger publicly all day and that's why nobody wants to have anything to do with me. Are you retarded ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 12:18 PM
2

Such posts are pretty rare and are always removed? So what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 12:15 PM
3

Because women are always attracted to looks, money and status. I've witnessed enough evidence to be convinced.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 12:14 PM
5

Yes, they are 100% to blame That's utter fucking bullshit. Just world fallacy again.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 11:04 AM
3

I've seen plenty of women claim they don't care about wealth and that looks are in the eye of the beholder. What could I be mixing up?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 11:02 AM
7

They are just assholes for the sake of being shitheads. They are a product of their own shitty personality and of their toxic echo chambers. Is this what bluepillers tell themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:59 AM
1

They either lie of they have no self-awareness. Women are mostly attracted to high value men(looks, money, status) and nothing they say can change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:50 AM
1

How do you think I act irl?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 12:07 AM
0

The trolling is a little too obvious, my man. I don't condone it but be more subtle.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 11:44 PM
1

Of course they are, also it's quite some more than 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 10:45 PM
1

At this point you must be trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 09:07 PM
1

You are unbelievably dense. There are certain ethnicities that are far more glabrous than others to the point of no visible body hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 08:29 PM
1

I already gave you an example, stop denying reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 08:28 PM
1

Sure, everyone has vellus hair but visible body hair except for on my private parts? Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 08:12 PM
1

Okay, glabrous then to be more specific. And it's definitely a thing, what the fuck are you thinking? I'm not talking about bald and eyebrowless sort of people. Chemo patients? Are you retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 08:11 PM
1

I want a woman of my ethnicity. Many of them happen to have little body hair. What the fuck is your problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 07:46 PM
1

I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 07:40 PM
1

You are in the top 0.1 percentile of hairlessness?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 07:39 PM
1

0
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 07:31 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 07:24 PM
0

Look at how angry you are because I state my preferences. They are not unreasonable because I know where to look, sasquatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 07:07 PM
0

How are they unreasonable? You're just angry because you're a hairy ape. Also, hairlessness is a human trait. Strange to attempt an insult with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 06:55 PM
1

I don't have armpit hair and neither has my mom and I'm not even south American. Did I trigger you with my preferences? Edit: The same counts pretty for much for anyone any woman in my family lol. My standards are reasonable. You shouldn't assume everyone on reddit is white and wants white women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 06:16 PM
2

Yes, they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 05:53 PM
1

I said there are south American tribes with no body hair so also no pubic hair ffs. About your question. I don't care about it as long as she has no hair on other places, not even armpit hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 05:49 PM
1

Yes, absolutely. It disgusts me to the point I could never consider women with a much body hair. It must be certainly less than what I have and I have almost no body hair. I don't think it's all social conditioning. I believe most men would find a woman with a beard disgusting. I prefer a women with almost no natural body hair so I'd also prefer it if she didn't shave. Not all people are hairy as Greeks so there's nothing pedophilic about it. There are south American tribes for example with no b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 08:21 AM
1

Are you having fun going through my comment history?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 11:45 PM
1

The hiccup is that I don't think it's realistic to think that in a fair gender-neutral meritocracy, 99% of leaders would be men. If it's like 55% men and 45% women, it at least won't be as patriarchal as things were 300 years ago. I still think it will be much more than 55%. And if that's patriarchal too then there's no problem with patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 11:08 PM
1

How do you think incels act irl?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 10:46 PM
1

You can't seriously think that's the state of things right now? Answer my question. Watch your implications. Patriarchy is the result of sociological constructions that are passed down from generation to generation. That's just the feminist perspective. There are objective differences between the sexes coming with different inherent behaviours which may or may not bring forth certain gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 10:29 PM
1

Let's say there was a society with perfect equal opportunity and the vast majority who rise to power and gain the most wealth through their own merits are men. Would that still be a patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 10:14 PM
1

How does that imply a patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 10:05 PM
1

In Africa many of them are dying from starvation. It would be beneficial for them if they didn't have so many kids. Bullshit. Having more children is beneficial because they will take care of the parents when they become older and can help out with the work. I wish you could ellaborate and describe your ideal society and what rights women and men would have, how socialife would be etc. I'm on my phone right now and refuse to grant that wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 09:59 PM
1

Well, then maybe we should find a way encourage them to have fewer kids in Africa instead of just starting a competition on who will breed more, don't you think? No, wtf. Let them breed. What are your moral values and what do you support exactly. I could write a couple of pages on my moral values but let's keep it short and say I believe the man must hold the dominant position because he is superior in every regard while women are inferior and mustn't be allowed to have the same rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 09:54 PM
1

Birth rates are declining everywhere False. They are rising in Africa. I support a full on patriarchal society because it aligns with my moral values. No need to move away from the patriarchy. The man is above the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 09:42 PM
3

Just world hypothesis is almost exclusively used by bluepillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 09:35 PM
1

It's different for other groups. Nah, this is pretty damn universal about tight knit male groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 12:38 PM
1

Some men suffice. Because they are the very best humanity can offer. Of course I can look at only half the guys and say they are awesome. They form the pinnacle of humanity, while the other half of the guys can be deleted without this influencing our survival. I will consider a group with majority superiority always better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 10:27 AM
5

It is mammal sexual strategy. The males want to fuck all the time and spread their seed far and wide. This makes the female very picky about the male she chooses to reproduce with. The end result creates high value men who get to impregnate huge amounts of females and low value men who receive nothing at all in nature that is. Tell that fat friend of yours females always have options and that she either needs to lower her standards or lose weight if she doesn't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 10:22 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that civilisation plays a part in this seeing how 8000 years ago one man bred for 17 females. Also, they are disposable in the sense that if we deleted those men it would have little to no influence on the survival of our species.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 10:00 AM
1

Not at all. It is the men who further our species. Both technologically and biologically.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 09:43 AM
1

I'm saying that those people you're describing can be easily disposed off so they don't form a hinder granted by men's reproductional abilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 09:34 AM
1

They are disposable, it doesn't matter. One man can easily reproduce for 100 females.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 09:26 PM
2

The smartest person will always be a man. The strongest person will always be a man. The most ambitious person will always be a man. The human that reaches the ultimates will always be a man and that is why men are superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 08:28 PM
1

If you say so but that hasn't been my experience at all. Sure, we talk about women in general or give some little remarks about some hot girl that passed by or we saw in the library but it never goes further than that imo. I went to a high school that used to be girls school with 70% of the pupils being girls. They gossipped unrelentingly with no shame to a degree not even comparable to the boys. Maybe adult women do it much less? Not sure. But when I look at my mother and other family members I…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 08:20 PM
1

In his 20's naturally. Past the age of 25 the sperm quality starts to gradually decline. It would be best to marry and make children before then so they can be born healthy in a happy stable family.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 07:56 PM
1

Of course it does. Just look at the definition of gossiping and apply it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 07:47 PM
2

Would be a dumb reason to marry over.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 06:55 PM
2

No, it's the opposite. Attractive people are judged as more extraverted and for attractive men it's even better because they are additionally judged as being more open.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 05:16 PM
2

Marrying for "love" sounds really abstract there. What do you exactly mean by "love"?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 04:29 PM
1

What are the advantages that each has that the other lacks? Compared to women, men gossip almost never from my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 02:04 PM
2

Unless you're extremely lucky, you're going to experiencea lot of fail before you land on something good that will stick. I disagree. This only holds true in the western world of perpetual hook ups. I'm speaking from anecdotal evidence but almost anyone married in my family did not "experience a lot of fail before you land on something good". Becoming married to your very first person you consider your partner isn't a rare thing that requires "extreme luck" in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 01:14 PM
3

Only if he's not handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 12:23 PM
1

No, they care mostly about the benefits they can reap for themselves and so should most men instead of pandering to every whim and wish of women in western society but the brainwashing of the young people gets in the way of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 11:45 AM
1

do we have many ethnic minorities in western countries that have no body hair? The amount doesn't matter, your statement is nonetheless false.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 05:45 PM
1

No, that doesn't make sense at all. Westerners aren't consisted of only white people. Edit: So basically whenever anyone here is talking about women or men I must first and foremost assume they are talking about white people and not humans in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 05:42 PM
1

Do you always do that? Edit: Must I always assume that when you're talking about women they're white?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 05:19 PM
1

And I am telling you that is false. There are ethnic groups where this isn't the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 05:17 PM
1

Only children are hairless, not young or teenage women. This is a false statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 04:51 PM
1

With one partner it strenghtens bonds over time through release of oxytocin while it's fleeting with multiple I'd say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 04:15 PM
3

No, it's exactly that. The frequency of having different sexual partners. But that's my speculation y'know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:50 PM
3

That's not how any of this works. You've really made your point there. More likely the person never learned to form deep / healthy connections. Your opinion is not more likely true than mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:47 PM
8

Where does it say it's specifically correlated in slut shaming environments as opposed to liberal environments? Surely, liberal attitude != liberal environment?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:06 PM
6

Not being able to form deeper connections with your partners anymore through sex I'd hypothesise, since sex has been reduced to something like a banal recreational activity instead of an intimate act.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:03 PM
2

It's called emphasis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 01:56 PM
6

That may be true but saying that generally promiscuity is caused by depression is merely speculation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 01:39 PM
38

It is unavoidable. Promiscuity is correlated to unstable relationships and even depression. You'll get people like this: https://np.reddit.com/r/confession/comments/6gvqv6/i_fuck_and_feel_nothing/?st=j4a7j09a&sh=bbbb1f9c
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 01:28 PM
3

Seeing how there are objective differences in biology and behaviour between the sexes, there are those who support the notion of gender roles having originated due to those biological factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 12:50 PM
3

It's not absurd at all since there are parts of the scientific community that support this notion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 12:30 PM
1

That's bullshit, go ask the amazonian tribes. They are pretty much hairless except for on the head. Some don't even have pubic hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 11:56 AM
5

perfect bodies *perfect faces You can have the best body but if you don't have a beautiful face to accompany that, you are not a Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 11:43 AM
2

A Chad is in the top 10 percentile of looks. He possesses excellent genetic quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 11:41 AM
3

Patriarchy has existed through almost all cultures since the dawn of humanity. It wouldn't be farfetched to say that gender roles are ingrained in our DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 11:37 AM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 08:12 PM
1

Your thread got removed, dude. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:40 PM
1

Why was this thread removed?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:40 PM
1

That's not at all, people will base the sort of personality you have on your face and with that seek the personality they desire influencing your attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:30 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 06:38 PM
0

Not to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 06:20 PM
0

Sounds like a nightmare. For the girls, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 05:46 PM
3

There are cases of men as old as 70 marrying prepubescent girls but I don't know about the general trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 05:45 PM
7

In Niger 76% of the women are already married by age 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 05:38 PM
2

That's not something I said in this thread. If you take issue with my username, deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:53 PM
1

Let's agree to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:48 PM
2

How am I being a troll? If you think I said something wrong in this thread, point it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:47 PM
4

I don't believe they care about that in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:45 PM
1

Is it socially acceptable for grown males to date sexually pursue 12-15 year old females in North America then? Because I answered based on the premise of it being socially acceptable since that is how you wrote it. and even if it was
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:23 PM
2

I remember in a thread a year ago, some people argued men's attraction to shaved women is somehow biologically related, however, does that really make sense? Yes, it makes sense. It's called sexual selection. Men all over the world have always been more sexually attracted to women who possess less body hair according the certain studies but for why exactly I do not know. But I personally agree that women shouldn't remove their body hair because it would be easier to discern between the naturally…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:19 PM
9

In places where it's socially acceptable for grown males to pursue 12-15 year old females, the men marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 01:51 PM
3

What are you not understanding?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 01:47 PM
2

and even if it was most grown males are not going to be dating 12-15 year old females They will marry them though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 01:01 PM
1

I'm talking about plain sexual attraction, for that looks are the most important factor. You're not arguing against that. While forgetting all the rest instantly. They don't contradict anything. Are you sure it is not you who is ignoring what I'm presenting?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 05:02 PM
1

No, but for some of us, they can be very necessary for it to begin. And someone who provides them - and a spark of compatible sexual chemistry - can be hotter than any model. Which is not my fucking point, I'm talking purely about sexual attraction. For that, your looks play the largest role. How can you be so dense to not stay on the subject at hand? instead of feeling really hard at the subject matter, and cherry-picking scientific data? I don't know what it is with you and your horrible argum…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 04:10 PM
2

Except that social and emotional connections are very good reasons for someone less attractive to beat out Chad Thundercock. Social and emotional connections is not sexual attraction. If you're already aware of all this, you've done a horrible job of communicating it to /r/incels. I don't need to communicate that what they're already aware of.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 03:52 PM
1

Nothing about the sources you've provided has contradicted that which I've claimed. Your point? Not to mention, you guys are worse than anorexics when it comes to making up excuses to see ugliness in yourselves. Yes, that's your opinion. I don't give a shit about your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 03:41 PM
1

What for sort of influence? Influence on what exactly in sexual attraction?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 03:30 PM
1

Then for what behaviour does it account? Does it account for sexual attraction?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 03:07 PM
1

Two links already. You place my comment out of its context and interpret the way you want because of your low cognitive abilities. When you'd understand the context you'd know I'd be talking about sexual attraction for which I do have links that support this claim. If you want links that support the black pill. I made a thread a while ago. that crying for a moderator is your best counter argument to any attack on your favorite suppository. The only reason I would call for a moderator is because …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 03:05 PM
1

I'm too distracted by the fact you can't actually defend it without your pet moderator banning everyone. Defend fucking what, you hypocrite? You start telling me the "I'm just observing the black pill is a joke" without providing any sort of argument for why and then you have the never to say I can't defend it? But I used the same definition you guys used when arguing women can't ever be incel. You did not. Instead of making unbacked claims at each comment, explain yourself. I can do that easily…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 02:31 PM
1

but I personally believe that nurture has a bigger influence on our behaviour than nature. Really? Do you think this counts for all human behaviour?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 02:27 PM
1

I'm just observing that the black pill is a joke I really don't give a shit whether you believe it's a joke or not, I stand by it. Unless you're volcel? If so, stop pretending to be incel. What the fuck are you on about? It's evident you have no clue about what it means to be an incel. If you take the meaning absolutely literal then to a certain degree every incel is a volcel. I've said this once already but no incel is going to fuck a disease ridden 80 year old granny.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 12:54 PM
2

Attack my arguments I've made here, not in another subreddit. You're deviating from the subject. This is literally an ad hominem. What I said in another subreddit does not invalidate the arguments I've made here unless I'm being contradictory which is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 12:08 PM
1

Ah yes, because I represent every opinion of every incel? Make up your fucking mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 11:40 AM
1

A credible source for what? I could argue that to me you sound like a bluepilled delusional moron and therefore conclude you don't have a clue about women but that would be absolutely retarded. Your argument has no substance and you deviate from the main subject here. Is this how you "debate"? Absolutely pathetic. Again, you're making another ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 11:35 AM
2

I think the best thing would be install to certain traditional values, make adultery and fornication punishable by public stoning. Strip women of their rights and return to a fully patriarchal society where women are owned by their fathers or their husbands whom they met through arranged marriage. Men will be forced to be responsible and productive again.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 11:16 PM
1

That's how I see most things that get classified as masculine/feminine I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 09:19 PM
1

Gender neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 09:16 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 09:01 PM
5

masculine woman" and "feminine man" Sounds perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 08:53 PM
3

Of course, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 08:25 PM
1

I'm not sure about what precisely you're telling me I'm obsessed but I know already I don't agree, why do you care in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 04:40 PM
6

Naturally trans people should inform, since they are in the minority and not everyone is consciously aware of the possibility they could be dating a tranny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 04:03 PM
1

Depends on what country you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 03:24 PM
1

Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 03:18 PM
1

Maybe for promiscuous girls like you but I would never associate with people like that in the first place so I can't imagine it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 10:58 AM
2

You have a good personality but you're too ugly for me to be sexually attracted to you. In other words, I don't want to fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 02:40 AM
1

Except they are addicted to self pity. I disagree, incels don't really self pity. They mostly hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:56 PM
1

Serial monogamists aren't sluts? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:57 PM
1

Yeah, now that actually makes sense but calling them whores will cause misunderstandings. and plenty of women only have sex in committed relationships, preferably only ever with one man that becomes her husband Seeing how only 5% of brides are virgins, I have the impression plenty of women are promiscuous in the western hook up culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:30 PM
1

Do you think all women are whores? I can agree with that. But not sluts. That's strange. What? That doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 03:24 PM
2

Fornication is fornication.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 03:21 PM
1

Now, back to the part where you were calling me a slut? Please cite my comment. I'm certain I did not personally call you a slut in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 03:02 PM
1

I didn't personally insult you and did not call you a slut, so it's within the rules. I don't deserve to be trolled for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 03:00 PM
1

What's up with this sub, are rules not enforced here? Trolling is against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 02:57 PM
1

I'm not a troll, I'm dead serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 02:56 PM
1

I never mentioned anything about holy energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 02:54 PM
1

You're not even that clever of a troll. Expand on that? I had sex with a married woman on Thursday. Which one of us is destroying society? You are both fornicating and I'm against that so both.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 02:51 PM
1

You are invalidating again. I can say anything that is within the rules of the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:46 PM
1

Which isn't a personal attack. I think you should cool it with your perpetual personal attacks towards me for my beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:42 PM
1

I thought this was a debate sub, personal attacks are not allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:35 PM
1

I am not talking in circles at all. You think this because you are incapable of seeing the logical consequence. My answers are straightforward and imply the obvious. Does this mean that those who have no plans to be married should be legally bound to remain virgins/non-fornicators? Can you imagine a different situation when fornication is illegal?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:32 PM
1

You're speaking like my sisters do when they talk in circles How exactly was I talking in circles, does fornication has some other definition then? perhaps you could say why you'd want to make other men and women into permanent, involuntary virgins just because they don't want to enter a marriage contract? "They devalue sex to something recreational and contribute to higher divorce rates leading to less stable families."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:21 PM
1

I am serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:13 PM
1

Invalidating is against the rules here. Reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:12 PM
1

It is not faux moral outrage. I'm genuine in my beliefs and find fornicators disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 01:05 PM
1

I said fornication should be illegal. I thought I was being pretty clear, why do you keep trying to confirm this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 12:55 PM
1

For me that's any woman that has fornicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 12:30 PM
1

What is fornication https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fornication How are you not understanding what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 11:48 AM
1

I said fornication should be illegal. Fornication only leads to the degeneracy of a stable society. Of course western countries contaminated with degenerate mindsets are against this because they are simply ignorant of the dire consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 11:07 AM
1

Why? It's not Chad, It's the hookup culture. Premarital and sex or just fornication in general should be illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 10:53 AM
0

I consider anyone with a high n count (more than 1) a revolting person. They devalue sex to something recreational and contribute to higher divorce rates leading to less stable families. I'll say this again but non-virgins and fornicators are vastly inferior to virgins and non-fornicators.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 10:20 AM
4

The number needs to be under 1. In other words, a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 09:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter