~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | New study finds men are leaving the workforce en masse, why work hard if you are not entitled to a wife nor children? This already happened in Japan by men turning into Hikkikomori and japanese economy is in the brink of collapse, men have left the plantation since theres nothing left for themThen Adress the fact that those men Aren't necessarily misleading women It really doesn't matter. At the end of the day, you believe that for whatever reason a large percent of women are getting with a small group of guys way outside their league. You believe it is unreasonable to want this supposed small group of men to not sleep with women way below their league, but do you think it's reasonable to ask this supposed large group of women to stop sleeping with men way above their league. I have … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/02/23 12:14 AM |
| 1 | New study finds men are leaving the workforce en masse, why work hard if you are not entitled to a wife nor children? This already happened in Japan by men turning into Hikkikomori and japanese economy is in the brink of collapse, men have left the plantation since theres nothing left for themMen have much higher sex drives. I can show you the studies if you actually care. Testosterone is a hell of a drug. So men are slaves to their hormones, cannot control their emotions and feelings, and should therefore not have to reform their behavior at all. It's honestly wild how hard you're simultaneously trying to shift the responsibility to women here, whilst also making men out to be these barely evolved cavemen. What im actually saying is that women can be realistic faster than men can st… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/02/23 12:01 AM |
| 1 | New study finds men are leaving the workforce en masse, why work hard if you are not entitled to a wife nor children? This already happened in Japan by men turning into Hikkikomori and japanese economy is in the brink of collapse, men have left the plantation since theres nothing left for themAlso telling a man to stop getting pussy is an impossible task. So telling a small group of men to stop having sex with women way below their league is unrealistic, but asking a much larger group of women to stop having sex with men way above their league is? Are you suggesting men just can't control themselves and it's therefore up to women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/02/23 11:21 PM |
| 1 | New study finds men are leaving the workforce en masse, why work hard if you are not entitled to a wife nor children? This already happened in Japan by men turning into Hikkikomori and japanese economy is in the brink of collapse, men have left the plantation since theres nothing left for themSo if the problem is all of these women chasing this small percent of men, doesn't it make sense to simply ask this small percent of men to stop leading on women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/02/23 10:34 PM |
| 7 | New study finds men are leaving the workforce en masse, why work hard if you are not entitled to a wife nor children? This already happened in Japan by men turning into Hikkikomori and japanese economy is in the brink of collapse, men have left the plantation since theres nothing left for themWhat is your solution, that women en masse give up their freedom, autonomy and self determination over their lives to sit at home and be a mommy bang maid for some guy who does the bare minimum? The framing of this post is utterly ridiculous. Yes, modern dating for men now means having more than a pulse and a job. If that sets the bar too high for some that they check out completely from dating, good riddance. There are enormous amounts of factors from economic to technological that are responsi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/02/23 05:01 PM |
| 2 | It is kinda arrogant how many women openly say they know men very well, and yet they keep falling for bad relationshipsYou are missing the main point by getting bogged down by all of these technicalities and side track scenarios. What you are ignoring is the primary part of my argument, which is that women are more likely to get harmed by not understanding men, then men do by not understanding women. Neither of us can actually prove our claims either way because there's no way to quantify this, but I think women are more likely to understand me than vice versa, because they risk more physical harm by not doing s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/01/23 08:16 PM |
| 2 | It is kinda arrogant how many women openly say they know men very well, and yet they keep falling for bad relationshipsYou're saying that it's because women mistrust the man, which I agree with, but there's further reason for that. Men probably equally distrust women they don't know, but a man isn't going to be as on guard. Why? Because the average woman is going to pose a significantly less threat physically to a man than vice versa. Even though there have no doubt been women who became violent after getting rejected, we both know it is men who get more violent, aggressive, and pushy upon rejection. Men usual… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/01/23 07:43 PM |
| 3 | It is kinda arrogant how many women openly say they know men very well, and yet they keep falling for bad relationshipsIt is lack of trust, and the fact that the average man is more aggressive and physically stronger than a woman. I don't think men truly understand how terrifying it must be to live life with half of the population like that over you. > if you are charismatic enough, rich enough, attractive enough , infact they might even mistrust someone good because they arent these things This happens universally. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/01/23 07:37 PM |
| 3 | It is kinda arrogant how many women openly say they know men very well, and yet they keep falling for bad relationshipsMen understand women far better than women understand men I don't think this is true. What are the consequences of men not being able to understand women? Loneliness, never getting laid, etc? Now what are the consequences of women not being able to understand men? Rape, murder, etc. Not saying it's impossible for men to experience these things, but given the overall threatening nature of men versus women, I think women are on guard so much because they understand man's nature. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/01/23 05:26 PM |
| 2 | So I’m supposed to believe it’s less naive, reflects more experience, and more maturity, to believe a MORE sugar coated and ideological version of reality?There are traits psychopaths have that women find attractive, that isn't the same thing as saying women are generally attracted to psychopaths. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/01/23 07:19 PM |
| 5 | So I’m supposed to believe it’s less naive, reflects more experience, and more maturity, to believe a MORE sugar coated and ideological version of reality?You can't say they're not sensible and self-respecting if you have to rely on subtlety and making sure they don't realize what is happening. The fact that you describe your own behavior as "insidious" and don't seem to care is genuinely psychopathic. You are actively making the world a worse place and are every father with a daughter's nightmare. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/01/23 03:13 PM |
| 5 | So I’m supposed to believe it’s less naive, reflects more experience, and more maturity, to believe a MORE sugar coated and ideological version of reality?The way you talk about women and the need to manipulate them is an objective red flag that would repel any sensible and self-respecting person. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/01/23 02:57 PM |
| 8 | So I’m supposed to believe it’s less naive, reflects more experience, and more maturity, to believe a MORE sugar coated and ideological version of reality?This is like saying men are attracted to crazy girls. Realistically we're talking about a very specific subset of men and women who like those kinds of traits, it's by no means all or even a majority of them. I hope you're upfront with the type of person you are with women, again you sound terrifying. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/01/23 02:43 PM |
| 10 | So I’m supposed to believe it’s less naive, reflects more experience, and more maturity, to believe a MORE sugar coated and ideological version of reality?The guy you responded to comes off as a literal psychopath, genuinely terrifying. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/01/23 02:11 PM |
| 1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"Cuckolding is a fetish that involves someone watching their partner have sex with someone else. When it happens there's a person actively cheering on their partner fucking someone else. The relationship between good looks and good sex is well-known Yeah? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/21 02:43 AM |
| 1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"They get married when the woman realizes she can't get better or "better" is too hazardous for her. Woah, people go for the best possible partner they can obtain? Crazy. This has dire consequences for the marriage, such as starfish sex, dead bedrooms and cuckolding All of these things are controlled by a multitude of factors that looks don't have much to do with. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/21 02:19 AM |
| 1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"How do you define not good looking? Why does this sub ignore the countless average and below average guys who still get married. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/21 02:06 AM |
| 1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"Read the room? If she's not feeling it then she'll probably have an immediate shift in body language and tone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/21 01:56 AM |
| 5 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"It's like you can't read. Women like men who are nice, the thing is many self proclaimed "nice guys" are just spineless and pathetic yes-man. You can be nice and still be things like playfully combative in conversations that for a lot of people sparks flirtation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 06:54 PM |
| 3 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"Who | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 06:51 PM |
| 1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"No, because if the entire basis of your personality and identity is being "nice", you are going to be a completely uninteresting person. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 06:51 PM |
| 1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"You're drawing on stereotypes that do not exist. Like you said, you need to be exciting, and maybe for a tiny tiny subset of women that means staying inside all night an inch away from a computer screen. But thing is, the guys that are genuinely like that are also the ones that get bored very quickly. I don't understand the consensus of this subreddit. Only the hot cool guys are getting relationships from women but at the same time the hot hot cool guys aren't engaging in relationships because t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 04:10 PM |
| 5 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"but being genuinely nice kill the attraction most of the time. It really doesn't, you can be nice whilst being witty, flirty and fun. Nobody likes a pathetic, spineless yes-man who is going never going to challenge or tease a girl in hopes for a crumb of pussy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 03:53 PM |
| 0 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"Are you aware of what a conversation is? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 03:50 PM |
| 0 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"Being nice is not a replacement for a personality lmao, I don't understand what none of you are understanding. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 03:45 PM |
| 2 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?""We love nice guys, we just aren't attracted to them" is like...a headliner in the RP philosophy. There is a difference between physical attraction, and someone having attributes that you'd want in a long term relationship. I'm not going to fuck a girl purely because she makes a really good Philly steak sandwich. The idea that being nice alone should get a woman's panties soaked is absurd lmao Again the overwhelming majority of "nice guys" do not go out, don't strike up conversation with that cu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 03:14 PM |
| -1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"They're not chasing pussy nearly to the same extent that aggressive guys do. I still don't understand what aggressive guys mean to you. Unless they're guys who literally push boundaries to the point of harassment, I have a feeling you simply mean outgoing and extroverted. I really can't blame women for choosing a guy like this, even if he isn't actually as genuinely nice as the "nice guy." Not to mention that many of these nice guys put women on a pedestal and are completely uninteresting becaus… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 02:48 PM |
| -1 | RedPillers, what would you say was your "RedPill moment?"if you're genuinely nice guy, but average looking, and somehow you've been conditioned to treat girls like human beings, you're FUCKED Most women love nice guys who treat them like human beings lol. The problem is a lot of "nice guys" do not take care of themselves, aren't outgoing, spend way too much time playing video games, and then go on to believe it's because they're nice that they aren't successful. The entire trying to paint women with what they want as a monolith is really cringe to be … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/03/21 02:35 PM |
| 3 | Where did the myth come from that men don't care about women's careers?I guess this means you'll break up if anyone changes their job then, or upon retirement if you marry. I never said that, I was just highlighting how her career impacts our relationship. If tomorrow your GF loses her job and becomes a secretary. Would you dump her? If not, then it shows you don't really care about her career. I would be very concerned because she loves the medical field and knowing her would hate being a secretary. You're strawmanning me pretty hard here, I never once said career… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/02/21 05:00 PM |
| 3 | Where did the myth come from that men don't care about women's careers?You got that backwards. Personality, character and interests haha an impact on career selection. Anyways, see above. Time at the job is time away from me so I don't care. I didn't get it backwards, I was saying what you are in a different way. And if you do not care about what your partner is doing if it doesn't involve you, that is pretty unhealthy. It doesn't add anything to my life. If anything her career may take away from the time we spend together. So you're not interested in your partners… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/02/21 04:51 PM |
| 6 | Where did the myth come from that men don't care about women's careers?You're gonna get baleeted for not phrasing your question in a neutral way. I don't need to be neutral to something demonstrably incorrect. Marriage trends show people overwhelmingly get with people of their same socioeconomic status, so it's abundantly clear that both men and women heavily care about each other's career. This subreddit is detached from reality, so I'm not going to entertain delusions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/02/21 04:48 PM |
| 1 | Where did the myth come from that men don't care about women's careers?Yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/02/21 04:46 PM |
| 1 | Can the red pill and FDS be summarized as "rules for thee but not for me"?No they aren't. Your desire to have sex isn't overriden by anything. At best you can control your behaviors, not your attraction. I can't will myself to not be attracted to big tits any more than women can will themselves to not be attracted to game playing or other alpha traits. I said to reproduce, humans are amongst a small subset of species that has sex not just for reproduction but for pleasure as well. What's found attractive varies significantly, and is often influenced by everything from… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/21 06:07 PM |
| 1 | Can the red pill and FDS be summarized as "rules for thee but not for me"?AWALT. It's part of female nature and sexuality. Our most basic biological instinct to reproduce is overridden on a daily basis, all the way from the amount of contraceptives to the amount of people who flat out do not want children. It is clear that we're not simply animals driven by instinct, but that our consciousness and intelligence plays an enormous role in our decision making process. It is beyond cringe seeing people like you think you have female nature completely understood because of … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/21 05:44 PM |
| 1 | Can the red pill and FDS be summarized as "rules for thee but not for me"?Because women WANT you to play games. If you don't play these games, you won't get laid. Making sweeping assumptions with no room for nuance is beyond flawed. We aren't creating this behavior. This behavior is something women naturally gravitate towards and with society actively incentivising it, all that's left is to "enjoy the decline". Are your only interactions with women is seeing people on instagram and only fans or something? Relationship oriented low N count women are the majority of wom… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/21 04:12 PM |
| 3 | Can the red pill and FDS be summarized as "rules for thee but not for me"?Caveman mentality | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/21 04:07 PM |
| 3 | Can the red pill and FDS be summarized as "rules for thee but not for me"?Sexually successful people don't go on online forums to rant about the opposite gender Sexually successful does not mean happy, and there exists dating advise and strategies on practically every platform on the internet. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/21 03:15 PM |
| 1 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?"Studies ranging in date from 1991 to 1999 quote the following incidence rates: 11.8% (Mexico), 4.0% (Canada), 2.8% (France), 1.4% and 1.6% (UK), and 0.8% (Switzerland).[5] These numbers suggest that the widely quoted and unsubstantiated figure of 10% of non-paternal events is an overestimate. However, in studies that solely looked at couples who obtained paternity testing because paternity was being disputed, there are higher levels: an incidence of 17% to 33% (median of 26.9%). Most at risk we… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/21 02:41 AM |
| 1 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?This article is behind a paywall | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/21 02:28 AM |
| 2 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?Good luck out there | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/01/21 11:16 PM |
| 2 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?Are you fucking with me man? How can you have such a warped perception of relationships. You shouldn't be in a relationship with someone you don't trust, and you especially shouldn't have kids with them. I was almost happy that you don't deny that demanding a paternity test will destroy your relationship, but am now beyond sad at how little you seem to care | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/01/21 11:08 PM |
| 1 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?They can act all lovey-dovey towards you, treating you with the most respect and secretly be fucking someone behind your back. That applies to everyone. Would it be reasonable for a woman to demand her husband wears a tracker at all times so she knows he isn't going out and fucking other women? After all if he's got nothing to hide, why should he object. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/01/21 10:56 PM |
| 0 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?Sounds like you are though to how much objection you have to men saying they want a paternity test just in case No I don't, if you want to demand one then get it. All I'm saying is that it will immediately destroy your relationship. If she did love me like I love her, she wouldn't have a problem with it. If you loved her like she loved you, you would trust her enough to not demand that. How do you not see this? How can you even say that you'll love whoever you end up with when you've preemptivel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/01/21 10:27 PM |
| -2 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?And you sound like the kind of person who would demand a guy be hooked on child support despite it not being his. No I wouldn't. Why should I have to take care of another man's child? You act as if this occurs beyond a tiny percent of child conception. It's not insane to have paternity tests. It's common sense and safe to do say It's insane to baselessly accuse the person you've presumably chosen to be with for the rest of your life of cheating on you. Do you not understand how any sane and rati… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/01/21 08:59 PM |
| 11 | Q4 RP Men: How many of you actually paternity tested your kids?She shouldn't object if she has nothing to hide And you shouldn't ask if you have no reason to suspect it isn't yours. Have fun destroying your relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/01/21 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?You follow cult like subreddits lmao, don't lecture anyone on getting outside of their world | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/12/20 04:32 PM |
| 1 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?I am a man in a relationship, you're cringe. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/12/20 11:36 PM |
| 2 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?Cry about it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/12/20 04:36 PM |
| 0 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?If your girlfriend dictates terms of sex, you aren't good at it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/12/20 10:03 PM |
| 2 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?It's like demanding your partner doesn't smoke when you go through 2 packs a day. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/12/20 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?Women dictate terms in mating. No they really don't. Why do you think TRP exists? Because a lot of guys are salty that women are having sex but not with them lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/12/20 05:41 PM |
| 3 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?Because it's entirely hypocritical | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/12/20 12:52 AM |
| 55 | Men aiming for marriage should avoid women with high N counts. How to recognise them?You don't think the same thing applies to men? People should marry people who view sex the same way. If your n count is low because you require emotional connection, find someone who sees it the same way. Too many guys on here have the delusion of wanting to fuck 100 women and then settle down with some innocent virgin girl lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/12/20 03:29 PM |
| 3 | [Q4A] What's so great about low-N women?There's nothing wrong with preferring someone who sees sex as more or an intimate thing, therefore likely having less sexual partners. There's a huge difference between that and treating women as literal material objects that decrease in value per man that has "used" her. Have you never pleasured any woman you've been with? I can't see any other reason for seeing sex as such a loss for women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/20 04:56 PM |
| 2 | [Q4A] What's so great about low-N women?You must have a pretty low opinion of men to think that their touch corrupts and makes something "used up." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/20 04:06 PM |
| 13 | The reason a high N count is impressive in men, but not so much in women:By far the smartest comment ever written on this godforsaken sub | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/20 05:29 PM |
| 1 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.I can't believe your personal experience is representative of a complex social dynamic, fascinating! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/20 04:36 PM |
| 1 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.That average life includes a boyfriend People in relationships have continuously become a smaller percent of the population over the years | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/20 03:36 PM |
| 1 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.In what exact context, most people you've never met before | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/20 03:36 PM |
| -1 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.But most women with this sentiment are still hooking up with men even though they’re supposedly “focusing on their career” and most likely have an n-count in the double digits by the time she’s “ready to settle down” Pure schizophrenia. A relationship takes enormous amounts of time and dedication, and not being in one doesn't mean you're going out every weekend fucking 10 people. I know this is incredibly difficult to wrap your mind around, but most women lead completely average lives where what… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/20 12:41 AM |
| 0 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.Ok? what does being a virgin matter | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/09/20 06:36 PM |
| 1 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.I never said it wasn't important, but the idea that a woman engaging in casual sex and "giving it out for free" is unfair because if she wants a relationship the guy has to work for what was given for free, is such an unbelievably transactional way to view sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/09/20 06:36 PM |
| 14 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.The amount of baseless bro science generalizations this sub creates will never cease to amaze me. Considering all of the nuance in life and how unique people and their lives are, I genuinely don't understand how people like you can make such massive assumptions and want to be taken seriously. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/09/20 11:41 AM |
| 63 | In the West, Men Should Avoid Any Woman over 26 Who Wants Any type of LTR.The red pill truly gives you schizophrenia. I cannot imagine reducing all women down as if this isn't a tiny subset of women, and reducing all men down to just being machines who only value sex from a relationship. It is completely normal for people to not even start dating now until around 26, especially if they went to school and then focused on building up their career. Acting like all women are fucking Chad as much as they possibly can and racking up a triple digit body count is literally sc… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/09/20 03:24 PM |
| 3 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityEveryone cares about character, it is in our nature to want to better ourselves and be liked by others from merit. Some put in more or less effort than others, but to act as if some minority cares about their intrinsic self is wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 04:36 AM |
| 1 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityLooking fit would be desirable if we didn't find it physically appealing. Physical looks are surface level, that isn't to undermine them because they are important, but they're literally the first requirement for any type of romantic relationship, they are the surface. Your preferences should be close to your merit and what you put in. If you want a partner who is in olympic fitcondition, it would make astronomically more sense If you yourself were very fit too. It is important to give your pref… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 04:02 AM |
| 3 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityWhat are you on about, you sound insane. I've never seen such an odd rant to avoid being consistent in character. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 03:55 AM |
| 1 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityEvery attractive physical characteristic has a reason for why we find them attractive, but that doesn't change the fact that our primary response to them is visual. A fit body can be indicative of your character, just like paying attention to your grooming can be as well. Physical appearance is in fact surface level attraction because it is also typically the first step in attraction to someone. It seems like you've given up your initial point and wanted some "gotcha" moment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 03:31 AM |
| 3 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityFeel free to do whatever you want, I personally wouldn't want such blatant hypocrisy to reflect from my character but you do you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 03:20 AM |
| 3 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityIt's not my opinion that attraction based off physical appearance is surface level, that's literally a factual statement. Physical looks are literally the surface of your body lol. The reason why people should care is because it affects your realistic probably of finding a partner that you desire. If a poor girl desired a rich man, I would simply show her statistics of people of socioeconomic levels tending to marry into ones of their level, and that the probably she gets what she wants is low. … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 03:19 AM |
| 4 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityYou are free to “expect” whatever you want from a partner without providing the same. In certain aspects yes, in others no. Obviously wanting someone with a vagina doesn't make you a hypocrite if you don't have one yourself. Wanting a virgin however is a highly specific expectation compared to something as surface level as physical aesthetics. You're free to do whatever you want, but you're hypocritical when you run through every scenario of why you'd want a virgin, when you yourself sleep aroun… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 02:42 AM |
| 5 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityI would think that if you found the image of your potential partners' sexual past icky, you would do your best to minimize yours. It's like saying you don't want your partner to drink because you hate smelling alcohol on their breath, but sit there drinking whiskey | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 02:39 AM |
| 4 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityThere's a difference between expectations/preferences that tend to be mutually exclusive with those that are not. If a man expects a woman to shave her legs, armpits etc, that doesn't mean he has to as well but does have to follow the expected male grooming practices, as he's expecting the female ones. With sex, it is shared between men and women as being a practice you engage in for primarily pleasure, it isn't a mutually exclusive practice. What reason could you want a virgin that isn't contra… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 01:37 AM |
| 2 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityIf it's something outrageous, yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 01:33 AM |
| 8 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityIt's hypocritical because literally every reason you could want a virgin is contradicted by the fact that you yourself sleep around | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 12:36 AM |
| 2 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityI would say so, yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/20 12:13 AM |
| 8 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityI didn't say they can't do anything, just that it is hypocritical. Whatever reason you'd have for wanting a virgin is contradicted by your actions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/09/20 11:54 PM |
| 26 | It's OK for a man to have preferences on N-count, dating history and promiscuityIt becomes a problem whenever they're delusional and hypocritical, where they themselves have had their fair share of sleeping around but suddenly want a virgin. There's also a difference between a preference and a dealbreaker. Obviously everyone would probably prefer to date someone making 100k/year, but that is worlds difference from staing that you wouldn't date someone who makes <100K. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/09/20 10:55 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Not inherently, no. The fact that rather than focusing on going their own way, they whine and moan about women being evil | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/08/20 05:01 PM |
| 5 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.It's perfectly fine to hold out on sex before love, but considering the financial investment of marriage, not a smart idea. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 11:53 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You are more than welcome to explain how the red pill's observations are meaningful at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 11:37 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Because responses to an internet forum literally follow no standard, not one that goes beyond having a keyboard and a lot to say. I do not understand how you, with supposedly 25 years of experience on wall street, cannot see that. How are you unable to see the literal ingrained response bias that such a fringe internet group has, inherently by the virtue of what lead them such a place? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 11:18 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Good Lord, how many men actually FORCE their wives to have sex? 1%? I never said men were raping their wives in mass, just that it took the law that long to make it illegal, as a testament to how much slower it changes compared to society. As the female-male ratio of child support approaches parity, marriage rates will approach zero. Marriage is more rare now mainly because of how expensive everything is now, and how much the cost of living has gone up. This leads to people focusing their early … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 11:10 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.What exactly is it that you incorporated from the red pill that improved your marriage, might I ask? The self improvement aspect of it, is mostly old age wisdom that has been known for quite awhile. Understand that while your story may be a success, I see those on here following the pill with nothing but clear and visceral bitterness. They don't seem happy or better off at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 11:01 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Again I credit this much more to how slow our legal system is to move compared to our society. It was legal to rape your wife until the 90s afterall. We're seeing women pay more child support than before, and will likely see that trend continue as the law catches up. Governments can absolutely afford welfare, compared to how little we spend on it with the rest of our budget | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 10:56 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.It attempts to make a scientific claim on human nature, more specifically women's nature, whilst be as unscientific as possible. It vastly underestimates nuance, and does not take into account at that their ideology by nature requires a response bias. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 10:50 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Yes or no, do you think you can make any meaningful inquiry using a methodology that follows no standard? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 10:49 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Glad it worked for you, but it is an awful attempt to analyze human behavior | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 10:32 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You are completely out of your element on this conversation, and everything so far has gone over your head. You have no formal education in science, and the statistical analysis you're familiar with is different than statistical analysis for science, which is why you're not understanding this conversation. This is a discussion of science, of human behavior as a whole, and requires scientific analysis. Why does anecdotal experience lack predictive power to make claims on human nature? Because it … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 10:30 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I have a bachelor's in chemistry, what you don't understand is statistical analysis and how science relies on reproducible data. That reproducible data requires you to have a dependent and independent variable, under a controlled setting, otherwise nobody will ever be able to replicate your results. Your methodology must be objective, verifiable, and once again reproducible. The problem of making yourself the methodology through your experience, is that you immediately exposing yourself to a ple… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 09:39 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You're acting like TRP is nothing but a fringe internet community. Maybe it's because of internet anonymity, but looking at the comments of many RP followers and they are clearly not mentally stable. I never said TRP doesn't work, it does after all contain enormous amounts of common sense stuff. Overall, the tactics though are going to hardly result in long term happiness. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 08:52 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I can tell from your OP all you did was take one look and say "HAH! this would never work" I took one look at it and simply had no interest in approaching dating and interaction with women that way. I built myself up physically, mentally and emotionally throughout college and learned enormous amounts from socializing throughout the years with peers. I approach and interact with women with the confidence I have gained from years of self improvement, supplemented by social interaction. No tricks, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 08:33 PM |
| 4 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Anyone a little too poor, a little too short, and a little too not-helping-my-social-status is a rapist according to women and their feminist masters Not even going to bother lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 08:28 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Empirical inquiry is only half of science and never actually produces definitive understanding. For that you need rational inquiry (aka theoretical science). I don't know if we're arguing semantics at this point, but the fact of the matter is, valid answers won't be coming from the methodology that the red pill thinks it has | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 08:27 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.There are translatable aspects for sure, confidence being one of the top ones. That being said, the alpha you are describing who is loud, overbearing, doesn't give a shit and takes what he wants style is not universally attractive, and will put off many women. Different circles usually bring about different desirable traits | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 07:51 PM |
| 0 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Again this refers back to my origin point from the title of the post. These "alpha" men, those who enter a room with an overtly dominating personality, are far too outspoken, selfish etc will no doubt attract people, this man will also put off many people, men and women alike. Having game is not acting like this, or being any of what you really described, as much as it is again being socially malleable/adaptive. The loud, overbearing bodybuilder isn't going to do well at a social function for po… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 07:38 PM |
| 0 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.The RP contains great self improvement tips, but none of what they say is really anything new. Pay attention to your fitness, grooming, hygiene, social abilities, etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 07:33 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.The law unfortunately cannot keep up with society, and many courts still operate as if this is the 1950s. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 07:32 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.There is a world's difference between thinking something will happen, and expecting it due to context, but I'm not going to really waste anymore time here. If you want to be a shitty person, go for it, just don't try and justify it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 07:31 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Because greater happiness cannot be created than from making yourself into the best possible version you can be. Most everything else is temporary, true happiness will come from satisfaction, and how could you possibly be satisfied if you haven't pushed yourself to be as best as you can be. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 07:02 PM |
| 0 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You can learn to be more socially competent in a romantic setting, just like you can learn other social skills. Again I think the red pill vastly misinterprets a man being confident, capable of competent versus being the kind of guy they are describing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 07:01 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You made a claim, I refuted it. Saying it happens in real life is a moot point, and doesn't take away from what I said. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:59 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.There are red pill truths, I think all the advise at self improvement in impeccable, albeit I believe too much of it comes from the desire for validation/sex from women. My issue comes whenever the red pill believes themselves to have female human nature figured out, not by the virtue of true investigative science but from personal experience. Someone from Moscow will have many different things to say about the USSR than someone from the Ukraine. Personal experience is a horrendously biased and … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:27 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.If your reasoning for not continuing with them is because they engaged in sex too quickly, but you also engaged in it, then you're just a hypocrite lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:22 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Men have low standards only when it comes to casual sex | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:11 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Being socially competent means being competent in social situations, and there are many kinds of social situations. You would not interact with your boss in a social situation as you would a romantic prospect. There is a difference between changing your tone and manner of speaking to be more flirtatious overall to a romantic prospect, versus most of what you mentioned. The red pill completely misunderstands the "alpha" behavior, social interaction is not a linear skill but often exponential. The… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:10 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I'm not undermining anything. There is nothing wrong with finding out you're incompatible with someone after sex and informing them you no longer want to see them. Going into dates however with nothing but the intention of leaving after the first time you have sex, knowing that she may think it's leading somewhere, is manipulative. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:05 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I think they're equally stupid if they try to stereotype men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:03 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Except those experts I'm talking about do study groups, do study individuals and are able to have reproducible and reliable data (the core of science). The difference between a scientist and a regular person studying human behavior, is that a scientist can be detached from the situation for all reasons but for pure inquiry. Eye witness testimony is about the worst thing for a Lawyer to have because of how unreliable it is, humans are bias by nature. Statistical analysis relies on eliminating bia… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 06:02 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Obviously there are things you should safeguard yourself against. Just like you shouldn't spend $10,000 on the first date, there is a difference between expecting human decency and being a fool. Some women do that, just like some men are equally manipulative. If you have the capacity to see what they are doing as wrong, then you should take it upon yourself to not mimic their behavior. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:58 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I don't care what it does, that's just the fact of the matter. Trying to say what makes someone aroused, as if there is one concrete answer, as as pointless as to ask what makes someone happy. Sure there is overlap, but it is accompanied by a sea of nuance. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:56 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.What you call game I call being socially competent. Employers are receptive to somebody who is able to communicate what they can do for their company, you're tapping on age old wisdom as if it is something new. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:53 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.It's a better way to say it on things like dating apps. In person, circumstances should be the tell. If you meet someone at a bar, and sleep with them that very night, that is an overwhelming cue that your encounter is incredibly casual. If you take a woman on multiple dates, say sweet things and buy her flowers, then bounce after she let's you hit it, that is manipulative. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:52 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I would sincerely hope a guy isn't that desperate and psychopathic to commit to months for just one night of sex. If you are operating under behaviors that lead to relationships however like dates, conversation etc and bounce without a word after you have sex, that is being manipulative. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:50 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.This is patently false. Red Pill is a philosophy that attempts to understand female nature better. And here we have the crux of the problem. I'll say to you what I said to another. "This is the core of the issue. How our consciousness affects our evolutionary instincts, still has much to be discovered. The fact that as sentient individuals, many people have absolutely no desire to have children completely contradicts the billions of years of evolution behind us. Answers as to human nature, sexua… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:48 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You are the better person when you decide to do what is right, because it is right. It is never the easy road, but it is the correct one and is likely to lead to greater long term happiness | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:42 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I cannot imagine a more pathetic approach to one of the most complex and worthwhile human emotions than putting a market analysis on it. Unless you believe capitalism is unethical, you can make a good deal whilst still being moral. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:41 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.It's not really an opinion at all, if you are manipulating and using people for personal gain, you are pathetic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:40 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.And I gave you an answer. Arousal is an immensely complicated human interaction, and there is no single answer for it. There are different circumstances and contexts to arousal, and it is made even more nuanced at an individual level. The less emotional involvement in that arousal, the more likely that less factors have a role. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:39 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.People who manipulate other people should always be shamed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:37 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You aren't at fault for expecting people to have human decency. There's a difference between her thinking you aren't compatible, and kindly rejecting you after the date, versus knowingly using you from the start. It is truly sad to see people try and justify their shitty behaviors under cheap technicalities. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:37 PM |
| 7 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.And if you are meeting women who are most receptive to casual sex and the tactics to obtain it, then you should understand that women aren't all like that, you're just surrounding yourselves with those who are. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:35 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Have you never heard of the phrase "not looking for anything serious"? Our parent's generation don't say it as obviously in public, but casual sex has existed long before them, and that kind of phrase is the obvious statement for it. Only a socially inept idiot would say something like "hey would you like to have sex and then have minimal contact again afterwards?" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:34 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.It is not the black pill at all. Casual sex is by nature shallow, so the qualities people look for in it will be shallow as well. If a man is considering a relationship with a woman, things like her education will probably play a role. If he wants casual sex with a woman, he likely couldn't care less and is looking at her tits instead. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:32 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You should be a better person, because it is the better thing to do. If you are wronged by someone, it doesn't justify you wronging another person down the line. Thinking it's okay to do something because others do it is nothing short of a toddler mentality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:30 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.There is a difference between being easy and having sex with someone once you have gotten to know them, but are still undecided into agreeing into a relationship with. Some people date for months on end before becoming girlfriend and boyfriend, and you should absolutely gauge your sexual compatibility with someone before agreeing to a deeper emotional commitment, otherwise you stand the risk of hurting someone or becoming hurt yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:29 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I am a man, and I would never do that to another person. It's beneath me and really any self respecting person to do that to another individual | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:25 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Or was he hoping it lead to another date, because he was interesting in seeing her again? You have an unbelievably limited view towards dating and human interaction, and its troubling to believe that you tiptoe your way around being a horrible person over cheap technicalities. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:24 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.MGTOW is predominantly about men no long participating in LTRs with women. Many continue to pursue casual sex | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:23 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.It is the focus on discovering and describing the innate (and usually subconscious) nature of women that all women have but express to different degrees that allow the RP philosophy model of women’s sexual behavior choices to be so accurate. This is the core of the issue. How our consciousness affects our evolutionary instincts, still has much to be discovered. The fact that as sentient individuals, many people have absolutely no desire to have children completely contradicts the billions of yea… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:22 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I am a man in a long term relationship, and that's all I really have to say about your master's thesis long rant filled to the brim with anger and projection. I've encountered you multiple times, and am not going to exhaust myself trying to refute the beliefs you have that are motivated in bad faith. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:17 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.FDS is just an example, you can find men and women everywhere with claims of the opposite gender being complete trash and yadadada | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:15 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Because you're being manipulative. How would you feel if you asked a woman on a date, and she ended up ghosting you afterwards when you just spent $40 on dinner. How would you feel if she went on to justify it, saying she was simply hungry? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:14 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Sexual compatibility is immensely important to a healthy relationship, and is why I don't think there's anything wrong with having it prior to agreeing to becoming exclusive. Saying that women should just close their legs until a guy agrees to be their boyfriend is sexist and pathetic | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:13 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You can be upfront with being casual without being an idiot | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:10 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I can't speak on all women, but I can speak on my girlfriend. Obviously we're both physically attracted to each other, but physical attraction is only the front door into sexual arousal. Trust, touch, familiarity, knowing each other's bodies etc. If you approach sex from a casual standpoint, all you really have is looks because everything that follows is from having an emotional connection, which is contradictive to most casual sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:10 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.So you're literally leading them on, and are being manipulative for the sake of an orgasm. That is honestly pathetic lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:04 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Again, I literally said show me the studies in response to him talking about his research. I have nor will I ever disregard someone's personal experiences. I will however point to the fact that other people have completely opposite views they do, based entirely off of their experiences, and that that is evident that things are far more complicating than they're making them out to be. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:04 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I agree. The problem is it's clear that this guy is trying to simultaneously say all women are like that, as if it speaks volumes for their virtue as a whole, but then say that he's not in fact trying to put them under a monolith. Men have shared characteristics, as do women, but trends and statistics are not deterministic, and TRP does not understand nuance in life circumstances. Our greatest evolutionary drive, to reproduce, is willfully discarded by countless people across the world with no i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 05:01 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.So if a woman wants a free meal and a man happens to ask her on a date, and it is followed by her eating on his wallet and then immediately ghosting him, she should not be concerned nor at fault for not granting him unspoken expectations regarding what comes after a date? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:56 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.There is a difference between agreeing to meet up at someone's place within hours of knowing each other, and taking the time to go on dates and make deeper conversation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:54 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.The only things that are beneficial from the red pill are common sense things that have existed forever. Workout, be more sociable, find a hobby, have a network of friends to meet people through etc. My comments are only vague in comparison to the intense logical leaps that TRP makes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:52 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Why does TRP literally always promote meeting women in the places where they are most likely to find Stacy's then? Odd how it is always bars, clubs, etc and never a thrift shop or flea market. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:51 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.If you are going on a date for the sake of casual sex, and know fully well that she is under that the assumption that those dates are leading to something more serious, then you are in fact being a bad and manipulative person. There is no other way around it, at least the other guy didn't even attempt to argue against it, and rather just didn't care. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:50 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.And you will find all of the women in FDS claiming that a good man is like finding a needle in a haystack. For me personally, I think the overwhelming majority of humans, both men and women, aren't just low quality for dating but in general as well. Call me an elitist, but reading the personal anecdotes of individuals here and on female dominated subs makes me to believe that most people are in fact just lesser than those who move the world. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:48 PM |
| 4 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.And very ordinary children brought up by a good family can become serial killers. None of what you said contributes to this conversation at all | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:45 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Notice how I said that about the research he has done, and went on to say that everyone having different experiences clearly shows the rashness of trying to put half of the population under a monolith. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:43 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I have no idea what you mean | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:40 PM |
| 0 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.And in your reality did this post makes claims towards all men, or did it make claims to a small amount of men who follow an internet dating ideology? Reading is a phenomenal skill. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:39 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.And all men are supposed to be conquering warlords, spreading their seed as much as possible right? Our greatest supposed evolutionary drive, to reproduce and create the next generation to carry our DNA, is actively discarded by millions of people across the world with their desire to have no children. It is clear that although we have an evolutionary history brought on by behaviors and instincts, our consciousness and intelligence plays an enormous role and can often ignore those instincts alto… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:37 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Expecting women to be holding out on sex until marriage is a pretty bad approach to dating. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:28 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.but they all lied as easily as they breathed about sexual attraction and relationship politics. Elaborate | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:26 PM |
| 4 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You can't claim you're in a healthy relationship whilst operating under the assumption that all women are the same lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:19 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.So you're leading women on with the notion that if they have sex with you, it will lead to something more? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:14 PM |
| 2 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.And do you try and investigate why women initiate divorce more? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:05 PM |
| 5 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I'm not a femcel, I'm a man in a healthy relationship who cringes at the red pill and its pickup artistry style. I don't think all men want Stacy lol, I'm saying that the red pill is meant for a small subset of women based upon the assumptions it makes and behaviors to incorporate based off of those assumptions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:03 PM |
| 1 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.I have no idea what you're talking about | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 04:00 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Not only is my opinion from research on evolution I would love to hear from a PhD evolutionary biologist in agreement of your claims. Unless by research you mean having no formal education and reading pop science articles. Interesting how people can have a different view of men and women based on who they were surrounded by, it is almost like humans are too complex to be painted under a single picture. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:59 PM |
| 0 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.You're not doing anything wrong, so long as you're making it obvious to these women that you want nothing more than casual sex. I couldn't care less about guys who want to spend all of their time getting laid, the problem is when they go on to act as if they are at no fault for their behaviors, and are only acting in response to women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:57 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Love and relationships are unquestionably the most fulfilling human interaction possible, and this is proven when you look at the history of art and its motivation. That being said, because they can be the most fulfilling they can also be the most destructive. Every individual should therefore be equipped with the best tools possible to understand the individual that they're falling in love for. Humans are far too nuanced and complicated than to be able to point to 50% of the population as evil,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:43 PM |
| 6 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.If it worked on gaining the attraction of ordinary women, there would not be such an overlap between the red pill, and MGTOW. The red pill is so unhealthily obsessed with women's "obsession" with Chad because they project their obsession with Stacy onto others. If the red pill worked at all in obtaining a health relationship, you would not see the same people over and over again in its circle. If you're using the red pill for only casual sex, then you can't really have your cake and eat it too o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:39 PM |
| 5 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.So you read about an ideology that makes enormous leaps towards claims of how women work at 16, and decided to incorporate it since into your 16 year old self? Again you're not doing yourself any favors here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:36 PM |
| 14 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.TRP actually works best on ordinary women. Strange, because I almost never hear about red pill men in any significant number talking about how it landed them a healthy relationship. All it seems to result in is spinning plates with trashy women, and getting angry at being rejected by even trashier ones. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:30 PM |
| 3 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.Guess I'll pack it up, your argument is too compelling | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:28 PM |
| 12 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.if you let yourself go and lose track of who you are, then yeah she will dump your ass I would do this for my girlfriend, and I hope anyone would for that matter. Nobody wants who they thought they were going to marry to turn into an unattractive slob. Getting into a relationship doesn't mean you can stop putting in effort, I don't understand how this is some huge argument against women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:26 PM |
| 10 | The red pill only teaches you how to attract Stacy, which does not work well on average women, and warps your perception of women.So you learned all there is to know about women's behavior when you were 16 years old, surrounded by other 16 year olds? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/20 03:24 PM |
| 8 | Is it better to act closed off or be open in relationships?There's a smart middle ground, bottling emotions is unhealthy, whilst nobody wants someone who is 24/7 talking about their issues. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/20 03:23 AM |
| 6 | What are your biggest fears and anxieties about the opposite sex in LTR or Marriage?Hope you're alone for the rest of your life honestly | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/20 03:22 AM |
| -1 | If there was a list of what the average man needs in a relationship vs the average woman, what would it look like?Maybe post the part about why the researchers are skeptical of the results, and the fact that it was from 1992 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/20 08:12 PM |
| 2 | Women create "nice guys".Have you considered it's because most sane people will have the same response to you trying to paint half of the population under the same brush? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/20 05:37 PM |
| 3 | Women create "nice guys".some guys that still take women’s words seriously The red pill is a cult lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/20 11:51 PM |
| 1 | Alpha/Beta is Not the Best Way to Characterize Interactions Between the Sexes/GendersThis sub tries way too hard to paint men and women under a monolith, where they can be labeled from a tiny handful of names that then attempt to perfectly predict their behavior. Humans are in reality far more nuanced, and consciousness gives rise to a multiplex of behaviors that often times clash with our evolutionary best interest | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/20 11:50 PM |
| 3 | Women create "nice guys".I cannot comprehend how you think it is some giant revelation | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/20 11:22 PM |
| 4 | Women create "nice guys".You spam this quote time and time again as if it is worth anything. Nobody is going to invalidate someone's personal experience with a shitty romantic potential, it is when you try to use it to paint half of the population as an easily predictable monolith | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/20 05:29 PM |
| 11 | What are your proposed solutions to make dating fair?If you want a society that shames women's sexuality and freedom, don't be surprised when every wife is giving reluctant missionary sex with a glazed look over her eyes. There was a post here awhile ago that completely demolished tradcon societies, showing how they're not at all the happy little utopias that trads want to believe | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 06:47 PM |
| 1 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menThat’s because average girls aren’t even considering the average men. This is a sweeping generalization, and not happening in nearly the numbers that the red pill is claiming. In terms of looks mattering, I think it is not as simple as you're making it out to be. It makes sense that women would at the end of the day be a bit pickier, the counterpart to men being much more willing to engage in casual sex, but again we need to look at the context around that. Factors such as women being more attra… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 06:40 PM |
| 1 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menAbove all types of privilege, even having money, looks reigns supreme. I've read similar experiences from the other side, where women claim men see average girls as only one night stand material, and only go after the much more attractive women for serious relationships. Being attractive is simply an enormous advantage in life, but I think trying to point the finger at either men or women is silly, considering it's simply a societal thing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 06:02 PM |
| 1 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?"Women gaining n-count correlates to infidelity, feminism, treating partner as worse and more disposable correlates to unattractive." I have no idea what you mean by feminism but the fact that you use it negatively says a lot, and you don't address the fact that men are equally correlated with infidelity as a result of sleeping around. "Treating worse" whatever that means, but unless you sugar coated what you said to your girlfriend, I feel bad for her. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 02:49 PM |
| 1 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?We talk about this stuff. Here is what she says: “I agree.” Seems legit! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 02:41 PM |
| 9 | CMV: Women do not truly loveThis is what happens when you no longer interact with women and spend all day long reading fringe dating theories. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 02:26 PM |
| 1 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?In practice, it doesn’t go like this. I’ve fucked a few girls with low n-counts, and my LTR’s is 3. She’s not bothered I never said this was some universal take, but in general that's how it goes. Like typically attracts like, girls who hookup a lot will be drawn to guys who have done the same, and relationship oriented girls will likely be drawn more to relationship oriented guys. I wonder what your current girlfriend would say about your claims of women who sleep around. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 02:10 PM |
| 1 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menThat Is a big factor for both men and women, but not the only one | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 02:06 PM |
| 1 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menBut I think you significantly underestimate the difficulty of the dating market for the average man, because you are not one. I met my current girlfriend on bumble, but I'm by no means some male model looking guy so where I fall in attraction I don't know. I fully accept that it is harder for the average man to obtain casual sex, but I do not believe the difficulty in dating for them is at it seems. I made a post a long time ago here about how dating apps are ruined by incredibly thirsty men, an… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 02:05 PM |
| 1 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menSo, not only are women more superficial, they’re also more narrow minded and cruel in how they apply their superficiality to men. None of what you said contributes to the conversation at all, it's at best anecdotal speculation. You're acting like there's some mass societal witch hunt against short guys, some girl taking a picture of a guy and posting it on twitter isn't exactly evidence of what you're claiming. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 01:59 PM |
| 2 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?Men feel repulsed by slutty women because they don't have the assurance of paternity, so it's evolutionarily programmed feeling to not invest in a promiscuous female. I think there are many reasons why women are judged much more harshly than men for sleeping around, and it isn't just due to educated speculation. You could argue for instance, that women should be repulsed by men who sleep around because more children means less resources to give to theirs. Saying it is evolutionary programmed is … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:37 AM |
| 0 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?What would you tell a high school senior with a 1.9 GPA who is hoping to get into Harvard? Imagine repeatedly screaming that people are allowed to have expectations, thinking that contributes anything to the argument. There are expectations, and then there are stupid, unrealistic expectations. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:29 AM |
| 5 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menIf you are an average man you are playing on hard mode even if you are fit, socially well adjusted, and fashionable I don't really think that's the case. Tinder is such an unbelievably awful representation of real life. Despite the fact that dating apps are increasing in popularity, people are still forming relationships by majority based off of their social circle. Finding someone you're mutually attracted to is at the end of the day a numbers game, and if you expose yourself to enough chances … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:27 AM |
| 0 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?Running away from the conversation and feigning indifference doesn't make you any less wrong. It is important for people to not have unrealistic expectations, not just in romance but life as well. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:22 AM |
| 3 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?Going back through this comment thread, this is why GirlGetter said he wouldn't get with a woman with n-count of 25, the same as him. This is not at all the case. He claimed it's okay for him to sleep around because women like men who sleep around, and for him to want a girl who hasn't because for them sleeping around does all of the insane things he claimed. You can be a man who has slept around with 100 women and still be shit in bed, just like you can be a man who has slept with 1 woman but i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:20 AM |
| 2 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menNone of what you have said is backed by any hard evidence, it is entirely speculation at best. People typically improve their looks for two reasons, to improve their confidence and self-image, and to attract people they're interested in. The notion that the primary reason that women jump through countless more hoops to look attractive is because of other women, is completely outrageous and unfounded. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:13 AM |
| 0 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?I've been on this sub for awhile and observed the general red pill sphere of beliefs. The vast majority of them despite putting in unhealthy amounts of effort to obtain casual sex, want a woman who has a very small n-count. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:11 AM |
| 2 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menNot necessarily. As for looks, that’s mostly genetic and there’s not much one can do about their genes The vast majority of people are average. Being fit, socially well adjusted, and fashionable can bring most people to dating level attractiveness. Many people are definitely playing the dating game on hard mode with the cards they were dealt, but unless you're born with across the board attractiveness, a lot of it comes from putting in effort. But men do fiercely compete for wealth and status (w… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 05:07 AM |
| 2 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?Women are not lining up to LTR a man with n-count 0, but men are lining up to LTR women with n-count 0. I believe that comes from the difference in pleasure from sex for men and women. Because men are generally the performers in sex, it makes sense that a woman would want one who has at least a little bit of experience, and a man would want a woman who have had less guys to compete with their performance. That's my best guess, I won't pretend to have all of the answers, but it's critically impor… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 04:55 AM |
| 0 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?There's physical characteristic differences that result in acceptable physical preferences, most men would probably want to be heavier than the woman they're after because men on average are heavier. Preference is going to be incredibly nuanced and nobody is saying it has to be perfectly equal, like having to go after someone who has slept with 8 people if that's how many you've slept with. That being said, the preference many men here of having slept around enormously, but demanding virgin wome… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 04:51 AM |
| 4 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menMakeup for women is about expressing youth, their main source of value, reproductively speaking. Youth is a proxy for their ability to have offspring and for the offspring to be healthy. Youth is the main source of value for both genders when it comes to reproductive health, with the exception of any genetically debilitating conditions. Contrary to beliefs propagated by this sub, women aren't flocking to much older men, and nearly everyone has a preference of dating around their age group. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 04:48 AM |
| 4 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menBecause women are competing firecely for the sexual attention of a very small percentage of men, and Your argument is self defeating, if becoming at the top percent guaranteed men a harem of women, you would see even fiercer competition amongst men and even fiercer desires to be attractive. I don't understand why this sub believes the majority of men are after life long guarantees to casual sex, considering the monumental advantage LTRs have in creating happiness. Because women project their own… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 04:44 AM |
| 0 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?Because unrealistic expectations are going to lead to romantic failure which leads to being bitter and angry. If my overweight unemployed friend says he has a preference for doctors who work out 6 days a week, I would kindly inform him that his expectations are unrealistic and almost 100% likely going to lead him to being single for the rest his life. The point is driven further whenever your expectations are hypocritical, like demanding a virgin when you yourself have slept around plenty. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 04:38 AM |
| 15 | Like it or not, it's women that are more lookist than menThis is such an unbelievably oversimplified claim that is exhaustively repeated here constantly. Women have low amounts of eggs, needing to make their offspring count, and men have an abundance of semen giving them much more reproductive freedom. That being said monogamy has not only existed in humans for thousands of years, but other species as well due to the effectiveness monogamy has in ensuring high quality offspring. The billion dollar contraceptive market and the fact that millions of adu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 04:27 AM |
| 1 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?The only women lining up for man-whores are those who view sex as casually as they do. A lot of low n-count women who are exclusively interested in LTRs are going to be put off by men who have slept around so much. Confidence can be gained from just about anything, you're falling for manosphere propaganda if you think the girl you're settling down with to get married is going to be excited that she has 25 women to compete with sexually. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 04:01 AM |
| 2 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?Well, when I had a 0 n-count, nobody wanted me. Now with a 25 n-count, I have an LTR and have new girls show interest all the time. Do you think women have psychic powers and can sense whenever a man has had lots of sex lol? Lots of sex is usually correlated with tremendous confidence, you likely had a change in your confidence that others picked up on. Happened to me and almost any guy who ever lost their virginity basically | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 03:49 AM |
| 6 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?"Rules for thee, but for for me!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 03:43 AM |
| 3 | We know your opinion on female promiscuity. What about male promiscuity? What do you intend to offer to this equation?Would a girl having an n-count of 25 be a dealbreaker for you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/20 03:37 AM |
| -1 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.It never ceases to amaze me that guys on this subreddit will blame even the most obviously bad behaviors of men onto women. Believe it or not, women enjoy sex and many don't mind having it early on in dating under the premise that it is leading to a relationship. It adds to my amazement when you all want to treat pussy as if it should be a part of welfare like a commodity, then write a master's thesis on how it's unfair that you have to spend $20 at Applebee's. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/20 06:16 AM |
| 0 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.The relationship isn't the prize. The sex is (For Men). That's where the reasoning comes from. Speak for yourself dude | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 08:57 PM |
| 14 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.The problem is that women choose scummy men and don't put any effort into dating. If a woman puts even 10% of the effort that men put into dating into filtering out scummy men, it wouldn't happen Women for the most part do try and filter out guys like that, you're just vastly underestimating how good some men are at being pieces of shit. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 08:57 PM |
| 1 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.It's not sad at all. First off, the entire female population is EQUALLY WEAPONIZED to get me. How? I'm sorry about your divorce, but statistics prove that men overall win from marriage. The trends show improvement in physical and mental well being, increased overall happiness, higher amounts of sexual satisfaction, etc. Love can be the most rewarding and most damaging experience in life, that's why everyone should be equipped with the mental cognition to determine if they want to take that risk.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 07:01 PM |
| 1 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.You said people don't GO INTO relationships with bad intentions. But, their behavior when they LEAVE them is often very different. It's relevant, you're just being obtuse. I said not everybody is what you describe and thinking about their date as some type of transaction, which is irrefutable truth. It's truly sad that red pill indoctrination literally makes you schizophrenic in that the entire female population is out to get you. No, it's very objective and valuable It is, but using it as if it… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 06:25 PM |
| 20 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.Again, nobody disagrees with that at all, few people expect to meet the love of their life on their first try. It is manipulation that is different, because it is a malicious behavior as opposed to finding out you're just simply not right for each other. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 06:18 PM |
| 1 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.You don't know anyone about a woman until after she says "I want a divorce." Then you find out who she is. Okay? Not sure what you want me to say to your anecdotal do nothing statement. So all TRP knowledge is wrong? No patterns of female behavior exist? LOL. Sure, if that works for you. Patterns for everything exist, the clear pattern through all of life is to continue itself through some type of reproduction. Yet countless well minded adults have no interest in children, and it's only growing … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 06:15 PM |
| 20 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.No but it's an understandable complaint, and isn't going to stop anytime soon. Nobody likes having their time wasted and heart tricked | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 06:10 PM |
| 4 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.No not everyone is looking for innocent love, but not everyone is some ruthless cold hearted calculator, scheming their way into love. The epitome of red pill bull shit is having Joe Rogan video level understanding of economics and evolutionary behavior, and thinking you therefore have everything figured out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 06:06 PM |
| 153 | CMV Being "used" for sex/your wallet is the price of admission.Nobody is really complaining about a bad date or clear incompatibility. It is the scummy guys who lie and promise their way into a girl's bed with no intention but to fuck her, and the scummy women who want a free meal and nothing more. It is the manipulation and games people hate, nobody is opposed to the idea of investing in someone of romantic interest. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/20 05:48 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notI can't imagine what goes on in your head | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:49 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notIf they all have weak egos like you then yes, it's a big ass problem for me. Who is they, the topics? I was confused as first, but your 3rd grade reading comprehension is a great explanation to why you're acting the way you are. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:35 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notI don't get it. I have a feeling this is a common problem for you on most topics | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:28 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notdoing so because of the empirical evidence that it is likely to be a bad experience for him. Once your son starts driving, there will be a statistical probability everytime he gets in that car, that he will be in a fatal car crash. I can't think of all that many great things in life that do not also have great risks to them. Marriage can bring you the best years of your life, or it can tear the family you built apart and leave you in shambles. Like driving, the best thing you can do for your chi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:26 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notYou said that men would still want to be around women if sex no longer provided pleasure to them. I don't understand where you got the idea that I disagree with that, or how it has anything to do with what has been said here. You genuinely sound incompetent | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:19 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notOk dipshit | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:12 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notI'm literally just talking about sex here. Women would lose just as much interest in it if it were no longer pleasurable for them either | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:07 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notThere's nothing wrong with equipping your child with the information necessary for them to be successful in life. There is a vast difference between that, and discouraging them from one of the most fulfilling things you can possibly do in life because of your bad experience. There is a reason that art, one of the greatest sources of expression that we have, is so often about romantic love. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 10:06 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notI feel bad for your son | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 09:45 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notWhen you start actually favoring men oriented towards monogamy rather than simply favoring the most powerful men who have access to the most women, and when you start rewarding those men with your actual love and sexual attraction, we will adapt accordingly. Until then we’ll continue to follow your lead which punishes our monogamous behaviors and rewards our attempts to garner power and use it to attract as many women as possible. This is very funny to me honestly, considering I am a monogamy or… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 09:35 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notI agree? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 09:02 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notIt is also confirmed by the existence of vasopressin in men and oxytocin in women to regulate or encourage these kinds of natural behaviors. Can you elaborate? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 08:02 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notYou can't really justify something as a "biological imperative" wherever such imperatives have been shown to actually be incredibly malleable. Reproducing is our highest imperative, and yet we've adapted to want less or no kids at all. Look at the millions of people, only increasing by the day, who have absolutely no desire to have children. It is clear and evident that we're not just animals, slaves to instinct, but have a deep and complicated consciousness that is capable of completely overrid… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 08:01 PM |
| 2 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notThe fact that you have a woman desiring you makes you feel like you have a better quality orgasm. Sure, but you realize that if you found a toy that completely replicated how a vagina felt, you'd be a billionaire right? It's the difference between night and day | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 06:24 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notI think it depends on who the guy is talking to. Group of friends, sure doesn't matter had sex. But 1 on 1 with someone much closer, both my best friend and I have agreed that some encounters were a complete waste of time | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 06:22 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notThe there's not much difference between the degrees of the pleasure I have when using my hands and when I'm using a pussy. The only difference is that with a pussy is much more funny What? I have a penis, masturbating is by far less pleasurable than sex. I'm completely at a loss here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 06:19 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notIn the Netherlands it's actually part of their healthcare plan, where it is covered for a man to see a prostitute once a month. In some areas of the world a father will take his son to a prostitute when he comes of age to lose his virginity to. I guess we'll need to pull up surveys if they exist, but prostitution is definitely seen in a different light depending on where you go | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 06:13 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notBiological imperatives can absolutely influence our behavior through instincts. The difference between us and animals is that we have consciousness and intelligence that can amplify or completely clash with those instincts. I can only even comment so much, because there's still so much not understood by consciousness by even the smartest scientists in the world, but I think it is clear by the day to day life we see in front of us, that our free will so to speak has just as much sway on our behav… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notAre you a woman? I'm not understanding how you believe that a man's orgasm doesn't have enormously varying degrees of how good it is | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 06:07 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notWow it's almost like the culture we live in promotes men sleeping around, and shames women for doing the same. It's almost like it creates a self fulfilling prophecy in how men and women will say how many people they've slept with, not because that culture is correct but because people want to feel accepted. Thanks for your completely hot take! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 06:06 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notMen get off easily, the best sex they've ever had doesn't matter too much Speak for yourself my guy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 05:56 PM |
| 2 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notIf the sex was awful and he was being truthful, probably not. The whole point of why banging a model would be seen as amazing is because her attractiveness would make the sex much better. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 05:55 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notIf you've conceded this, then you've basically conceded the whole argument. That's the basis of the distinction of what promiscuity represents in each of the sexes. No, because I don't think any of you are understanding that saying it is harder for men to obtain casual sex, is not at all an argument to justify why men should be able to sleep around with less scrutiny than women. I mean, you absolutely can place a numerical value on sex. You can also put a numerical value on a human being, that d… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 05:52 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notYou missed the point of what I said entirely. I'm not saying that we don't have a biological drive for most of what we do, but their argument was way too oversimplified. There is a vast difference between a biological imperative like drinking water to keep you alive, and a social interaction like sex. I think this sub completely underestimates nuance at an individual level for being responsible for our actions, we aren't slaves to our biology | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 05:44 PM |
| 5 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notDo you not see how stupid of an argument that is? Have you ever heard in your life of someone bragging over the sex they got because it was hard to obtain? No, all locker room or girl talk is literally always about how good the sex was. That's what the only concern should really be | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 05:42 PM |
| 6 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notIt is almost like the attractiveness of the person you're having sex with plays a role in the intensity of your orgasm. Blame "Chad" for having sex with women he's significantly more attractive to, don't act like any man would pass up the opportunity to get with a woman out of their league | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:34 PM |
| 5 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notBecause it is not jaded, not corrupted yet. No, it's just not well thought out lmao. Kids are really stupid, there's a reason why most people look back at high school and cringe at themselves | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:32 PM |
| 1 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notI think it depends on where you live honestly | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:31 PM |
| 2 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notNo it is not, nor is biological incentive dictative of our actions. There are millions of people who have no desire to have children, if that isn't evident of the power that our consciousness has, I don't know what is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:29 PM |
| 5 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notThat's not the reason sex has value for men. For men, the achievement and validation gives sex value. Yes it is, I'm a man lmao. There's definitely a sense of accomplishment and validation that comes along with it, but if tomorrow , cumming did not provide any pleasure, an unbelievable amount of men would suddenly have 0 interest in sex. Women have a hard time understanding this, because for them sex isn't an achievement, because it's so easy for them to obtain. This is another flawed notion. Ju… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:26 PM |
| 5 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notEveryone? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:07 PM |
| 2 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notThat's why a man who can sleep around is so valuable... In other words, it's easy to be a concubine, but it's almost impossible to be a sultan. But what does that matter to anything but a man's ego? If tomorrow orgasms no longer provided pleasure, you would see an unbelievable plummet in sexual activity, because that pleasure is the basis of what gives it value. I don't see how "it is more difficult for men to obtain" is an argument. Nobody ever brags about the most difficult to obtain sex in th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:06 PM |
| 3 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notThe reason why why women hate men who use prostitutes for example is its "taking the easy way out" in their eyes so to speak. I think it has to do more with the fact that many prostitutes are the result of human trafficking, get abused, are desperate, etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:02 PM |
| 3 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notA marathon has higher value than walking 5 feet because the difference in the finish line is so enormous. Sex is given value from how pleasurable it is, and unless you have some way to prove your pleasure is greater than everybody elses, you can't really place the kind of value on sex that you're attempting | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 04:00 PM |
| 7 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notYour argument is that men might be seen better because it is more difficult for them to obtain sex, so if they're obtaining it that means they have some qualities going for them. Age old argument that I'm not disputing, I'm disagreeing with the notion that you can place value on sex like an object. Imagine if someone said their baby has more value than other babies because rather than a standard birth, the wife had to go through several additional procedures | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 03:54 PM |
| 7 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notWell In high school In my high school a kid put his own shit in another kid's locker for hitting on his girlfriend at a party. Not exactly a great place to try and understanding human nature | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 03:45 PM |
| 5 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notHe's using it as an argument to place value on sex. Nobody gives a shit about trivial laws of supply and demand with sex, they just want to cum lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 03:43 PM |
| -2 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notThis goes beyond sex No, it doesn't. When someone wants sex, they want sex. It's really that simple Things that are easy to achieve aren't valued highly, things that are difficult to achieve are. Things have value because they have use to us. An orgasm provides one of the highest dopamine rushes possible in our bodies, it is honestly silly to try and apply laws of supply and demand to this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 03:42 PM |
| 9 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notIt’s just women don’t care how much the guy slept around if the women actually likes him. In general women care less about a man's history, but to say as a whole that they do not care is inaccurate | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 03:35 PM |
| 2 | Do you believe men are more justified in sleeping around? Why or why notConsidering that sex is seen as overwhelmingly for pleasure now, why does the ease or difficulty of obtaining it matter at all? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/20 03:34 PM |
| 3 | Women don't appreciate the value of sex since its so readily available to them. That's why they will never understands mens obsession with avoiding high N count women for LTRsThis is the smartest thing ever said on this sub | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/07/20 02:20 PM |
| 0 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.There is a difference between believing someone, and letting them claim that their experiences are the factual basis for reality as a whole | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/07/20 05:36 PM |
| 0 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.Okay, and you'll find the lived experience of many women where men are villains | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/07/20 04:54 PM |
| 14 | Men's Flirting Privileges Depend On Their AttractivenessThey are right in that if a woman finds the guy hitting on her to be attractive, it's less likely to be creepy, but they ignore the army of men who comment on how lucky some 14 year old guy was to be sexually assaulted by his female teacher. Creepy is creepy, and we unfortunately let attractive people get away with more than they should, but to act as if women are the only ones doing it is pure delusion | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/20 04:06 AM |
| 3 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.What exactly did you open up about with them, and how long did you know them for beforehand? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 07:20 PM |
| 5 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.And you noticed a change in their attraction to you if you ever opened up? How many women? I'm really curious about this because I have literally experienced the complete opposite | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 05:40 PM |
| 4 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.Where have you met these women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 05:21 PM |
| 4 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.Why do you think talking about your emotions makes you weak? Like there's a difference between having a mental breakdown because someone honked at you in traffick, versus being incredibly stressed and frustrated from a demanding job. If someone perceives you as weak simply for showing your emotions, regardless of the circumstances, they're a waste of time. I can absolutely promise you that there are plenty of women who absolutely want their partner to communicate their feelings. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 05:05 PM |
| 3 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.I call that awful risk assessment, why in the world would you invest that much time, energy and money into someone who you wouldn't be able to confide in? I'd rather be alone than be in a relationship from someone I can't talk to | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 04:47 PM |
| 4 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.I guarantee you that if we went to a woman dominated sub like this, you'd find a plethora of women who think men cannot be emotionally confided in or don't care at all. The worst thing you can do for your dating life is to allow previous bad relationships to make you so bitter and jaded | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 04:34 PM |
| 1 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.Can you find any studies with tangible positive effects that stoicism has? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 04:23 PM |
| 8 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.If you cannot confide in your girlfriend or boyfriend, that's not a relationship, that's a friends with benefits | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 04:16 PM |
| 8 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.Stoicism is peak mental illness | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 04:15 PM |
| 14 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.I am sorry you've had such shitty girlfriends, but that is not only an untrue claim but a destructive one too | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 03:59 PM |
| 7 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.Luckily I'm able to confide in my best friend now, but for much of my life with the guys I rolled with, there was an unspoken but well known rule to never really show your emotions and always keep the atmosphere jovial. Whenever I read men here claiming it is because of women that they're feeling bottled up, it genuinely shocks me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 03:43 PM |
| 8 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.I am a man, and if we're using experience to make sweeping statements, it was other men who would shame me for showing any kind of emotional vulnerability, all the way until college where I found a good group. I have always communicated and shared my emotions to girlfriends whenever they'd arise, and that always helped build such a more solid relationship. Why are you trying to demonize women instead of acknowledging that there are just emotionally stunted idiots out there, both men and women, w… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 03:31 PM |
| 26 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.I cannot believe this sub has descended into such delusions that posts claiming women do not care at all about the emotions of their male partners is getting upvotes. Nobody likes someone who is overly emotional, or communicates their emotions in the form of exploding, but the notion that women will no longer find a man attractive if he does something as simple as venting some frustrations, is just complete nonsense. It is literally all male groups that engage in the least almost of emotional sh… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 03:05 PM |
| 20 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.You couldn't change my mind on how little women care about men Then don't make a post flaired with "change my view" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 02:53 PM |
| 0 | The recent chain of posts reinforces how apathetic women are to men's emotions.Yup, nailed it on the head | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 02:51 PM |
| 3 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?Anything else is you are saying is some emotional diarrhea. Everything I am saying is directly from red pill beliefs | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 02:19 PM |
| 5 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?Selfish as in doing or saying anything for a quick fuck, and actively not caring about the person you are doing it with. The red pill actively preaches to not care about the pleasure of the other person when having a casual hookup. Any of the good from it is mostly common sense stuff you can find elsewhere, and elsewhere doesn't have the same harmful tactics. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 04:22 AM |
| 1 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?I can't see the number count because it's quarantined, but that is unbelievably sad if there's that many subscribers yet only a handful of posts from the last month got even 1k upvotes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 04:20 AM |
| 1 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?Where are you getting that number of subscribers | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 03:54 AM |
| 3 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?Looking at the top post of the week from the red pill subreddit, it has 465 upvotes. That's not exactly huge, even if say only 1 out of 10 active members are upvoting stuff. Sympathizer of exactly want, the red pill and most subs like it have enormous amounts of simply common sense self improvement stuff, not really that revolutionary | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 02:20 AM |
| 5 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?The reason why I said the red pill turns you into a psychopath is because of ruthless selfishness that it promotes, and the notion of "spinning plates" and treating women with such little humanity. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/20 01:37 AM |
| 3 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?You don't need to go to a strange niche subreddit to figure out something as fundamentally important has to how not to be taken advantage of in general. The fact that the red pill has posts everywhere from how to seduce mentally unstable women, to turning yourself into basically a psychopath just to have access to casual sex, is all in all why it will never gain traction. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/06/20 10:57 PM |
| 12 | How Are Women Viewed by The Average Man?Holy smokes on here there’s a lot of disassociation from reality. The more I see of this sub, the more I believe that the absolute best thing you can do for your dating life as a man is to avoid it all together. I am genuinely happy that I am not a woman, because the way so many guys talk about them here and the clear instability they harbor, coupled by the fact that they probably hide it in real life, would make me absolutely terrified to date. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/06/20 10:05 PM |
| 1 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Men are naturally not monogamous And yet married men tend to be happier than unmarried men, and men are less likely to file for divorce than women. You sound like you watched a 30 minute nature documentary and think you're an expert on evolution now lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 05:20 AM |
| 4 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?I'm not discrediting that there have been men who has girlfriends that left them for another man, and did all of the things you described. What is insane however is when those men come together, and begin to classify all women as following those exact behaviors, and then through conformation bias creating forums to work backwards and prove it. Red pill like subreddits are filled to the brim with examples of women acting exactly as they describe, because in the age of the internet where countless… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 05:16 AM |
| 4 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?If half of all women have 3 orbiters each Where are you getting this number from | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 04:06 AM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?I understand that, and there are clear objective reasons that have made dating in general harder, number one above all being the socioeconomic change in the last several decades and how career oriented people have to be in their 20s just to get anywhere. The attempt however to slander women as a whole is inexcusable, and these men need to be called out for it because they're only sabotaging themselves | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 04:04 AM |
| 5 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?You see this mindset irks me more than anything, acting as if men now have it hard and we're being left behind in the dust. There has literally never been a better time for men to be alive than now. Before even discussing all of the insane physical labor men had to do, wars they had to fight and die in, and deaths from lack of modern medicine, for most of human history only a small fraction of men actually went on to reproduce. We live in the most peaceful, prosperous and best time, filled with … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 03:53 AM |
| 2 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?I couldn't tell you because I'm a man, but my girlfriend told me it would literally be 9/10 comments, even from guys who looked like they'd be nice who would immediately start off with sexual comments. I think a lot of the men here who don't gave to experience male thirst vastly underestimate how prevalent it is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 03:39 AM |
| 2 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Literally what's the point in coming onto a sub to ask a question if you know you won't like the answers? All these people have taken time out of their day to answer your question and you've entirely disregarded what's been said and disrespected everyone here There have been maybe a handful of responses that actually attempt to answer the question of the post and I responded to them accordingly. I can sympathize with other men who have had dating struggles, I have no sympathy for the cry babies … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 03:29 AM |
| 4 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?I've had dating struggles of my own, everyone has. If by piecing the puzzle together, you mean having confirmation bias for delusional theories, then that is what is going on. Contrary to what many men here have come to believe, women are regular people who experience dating struggles, sometimes similar and sometimes not, just like men. I don't know how it came to be that women are these supposed ruthless calculators, always trying to jump to a hotter, richer or more ripped guy, but that and the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 03:24 AM |
| 1 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Literally the bulk of this subreddit lmao, it is one of the countless whiny talking points. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 02:44 AM |
| 1 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?You're so close to getting the point | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 02:31 AM |
| 2 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?The correct analogy would be like really wanting a burger, so you use a grenade to cook the meat. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 02:27 AM |
| 8 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Being creepy as in touching someone without their consent, or going up to them and saying something completely out of line sexually. Being attractive in general allows for people in instances to get away with being creepy or coming close to it. To act as if it is only women who allow men to get away with this, and not many men who allow women too, is disingenuous. People in general will be less likely to find someone creepy if they're attracted to them, it applies in both ways | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 02:25 AM |
| 12 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Every woman who is at least a 5 has at least 3 orbiters in her DMs ready to LTR her. But she’s too busy being used as a cumrag for a man out of her league on a Tuesday night when he is bored. Delusional | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 02:03 AM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?That is absolutely not the reason so many men are aggressive and immediately sexual, it's because they're trying to hookup and hope by sending 100 women messages like that, that maybe 1 will respond positively. Why does this sub act as if there literally isn't millions of average guys in a relationship right now? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 02:01 AM |
| 8 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?The reason so many have become thirsty and aggressive is because they have been deprived of love due to them not being in that top 15-20%. "Yeah sorry I sent you a picture of my cock, asking if you'd want to suck on it like a good little slut, I've just really wanted a girl I can love and cherish ya know?" Bro get the fuck out of here lmfao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:47 AM |
| 10 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Because it's exhausting to constantly see the complaint that "it's only creepy if the guy isn't hot!!!" As some epic argument justifying why women are evil. Not saying you made it, but it's one constantly thrown around here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:45 AM |
| 9 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?There are countless men and women out there desperate for a good partner and are struggling to obtain them, and my heart does go out to them. It's even more sadder however when that struggling turns to trying to slander literally half of the population. I’m just pointing out that there is a good portion of women throwing this whole thing out of balance And you will find countless women reporting how they and their friends try desperately to get into a relationship, but find that a good portion o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:43 AM |
| 1 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Married men report being happier than unmarried men, and unmarried women report being happier than married women. Where is the evidence that "men at large" are running away from marriage? The difference in millenial marriage compared to older generations is almost entirely socioeconomically based | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:37 AM |
| 6 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Almost none of the responses have actually addressed my question. Probably not going to bother with this sub anymore because it's just whiny men who project their failures by crafting elaborate fairy tales that it's because every woman is secretly fucking Chad as to why they're undesirable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:30 AM |
| 4 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?And this goes both ways entirely | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:28 AM |
| 4 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?She would have preferred to go through life with chad and is more than willing to put up with anything he throws her way but he’s not giving her that luxury. It’s Stacey’s burden to bear. I genuinely feel bad for you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:24 AM |
| 12 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Being creepy is being creepy, and there's no excuse for it. To act as if women are the only ones who give a pass to when it is someone attractive to it is a fucking joke. Go to any Facebook post about some hot young female teacher raping her minor student and you'll have an army of men saying how lucky the kid is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:14 AM |
| 6 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Thirst from an attractive man is good, but thirst from a below average is creepy? There's an enormous difference between approaching someone and being thirsty. And although hot guys can get away with more, it is less obnoxious than the hot teacher molesting her 13 year old student and the swarm of men joking about how lucky the kid is. This strips unfair amounts of wealth from fathers, destroys the family unit, takes custody away from fathers so they cannot be as much a part of their children's … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:13 AM |
| 6 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?They’ll choose chad every time because they know that respectable guy will be waiting for them after chads used them up. This is literally a fairy tail lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 01:07 AM |
| 1 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Fight or flight dictates that in a stressful situation, men will either run or fight. Fight does not mean kill. When is the last time you saw the majority of disagreeing between men end in them sprinting away from each other or attacking? Because fight or flight is triggered when something is perceived to be an immediate threat to your life. These are just proven facts you don't like. No, these are ill-conceived beliefs that are based off of enormous misconceptions. There is an overwhelming diff… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:58 AM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?women will always Sweeping generalizations like that are a good way to make sure nothing else said afterwards is ever read | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:53 AM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Men have the instinct to kill. Men generally have more of an instinct to be capable of killing in the right circumstances. That is overwhelmingly different from simply having the instinct to kill, which would likely be the result of some type of serious mental illness. You're overall a waste of time, and I'm not going to spend any more of mine with your outlandish, disingenuous and overall insane arguments. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:31 AM |
| 12 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?They have full freedom to fuck around with a bunch of delusional, average looking women, women who could already be in loving, committed relationships with their looksmatch, then afterwards being able to settle down with a top tier woman whenever he wants This is the dangerous delusion this sub has crafted, and the fact that you're smart enough to acknowledge that you're jaded puts you leagues above the rest of this sub. I highly recommend leaving it and others like it, because in real life wome… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:28 AM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?You cannot make such enormous claims and then just say "oh it's just my observation." Get the fuck out of here lmao. Imagine someone said "all men are rapists and ruled by violence, oh don't ask me to actually support that claim it's just my observation haha!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:23 AM |
| 6 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?It would save us all a lot of time if you guys would stop being disingenuous, and stop pretending to not know the difference between a simple desire to have sex and the kind of "thirsty" that I'm talking about | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:20 AM |
| 1 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?"They are literal slaves to their impulses" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:19 AM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?They are literal slaves to their impulses There have been a plethora of studies on species and the behaviors of male and females, mind citing one that supports this claim? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:18 AM |
| 1 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Again, I don't think you're realizing the way many men behave online whenever they're talking to a woman. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:17 AM |
| 11 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?If women Again, you're not addressing my question. Why are you tempting to police all of women, when you could police the supposedly tiny percent of men who are hoarding all of them, thus nipping the problem in its origin | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:16 AM |
| 2 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?What makes men desirable Is treating women with humanity. Make a tinder as a woman, experience it yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:13 AM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?And here we have the classic PPD guy who somehow knows more than PhD evolutionary biologists | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:12 AM |
| 7 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Women date down because they weren’t able to date up. Did you go out and interview every woman out there dating a man who wouldn't be considered as good looking as her? Think for a moment how insane you sound. It never ceases to amaze me that this sub treats women as these supreme calculating snakes constantly on the move to get with a hotter man. It is depressing that the idea that women are just regular ass people is a controversial statement here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:04 AM |
| 6 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?the average woman has a LOT more men giving them attention than the other way around. And an unbelievable amount of that attention is from thirsty, aggressive and undesirable men, not because they don't have some chiseled jawline but because they're all in all losers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:02 AM |
| 2 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?I swear the best thing men can do for themselves and their dating life is to avoid this sub altogether. It has truly impregnated your minds with the notion that it is only Chad is out there having sex. Are you truly telling me that the single mom's out there all shacked up with Chaning Tatum looking men? There are countless ugly, broke ass men who have had children | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/06/20 12:00 AM |
| 12 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Women always date up, except when they date down, but if they date down it's because they're using his money so they can date up huh? Keep moving the goal posts and you can't lose the argument | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:57 PM |
| 5 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Women in general have more options due to the fact that men approach more, but to act like every woman has a rollercoaster line of gentlemen lined up ready to wife them up is just nonsense. Again I encourage you to make a tinder as a woman, and see how these prince charmings message women online. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:55 PM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?My point still stands. If the man is hot enough to get sex even if he is "a loser in every sense of the word" then he is chad. Even if he does not look like thor. When I said loser in every sense of the word, I meant loser in looks too. This notion that single moms in mass had a bunch of kids with Chad's and are now looking for some average guy to front the bill is nothing short of the delusions of men on here. Most single moms had children with completely average men | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:51 PM |
| 9 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Resulting in more women stuck settling for men that they really don't want to date. Women never like men in their own league, they always seek better. Where exactly did you get this fact from? Go into r/relationship_advise and there is a never ending supply of women clearly dating down lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:48 PM |
| 2 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?I hope you're far more outraged over the Iraq war than you are about "female hypergamy" then, considering how much more money went to it. This seems like an unbelievably poor argument | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:46 PM |
| 7 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?What? The best thing you can do for yourself in general for dating, male or female, is to have a healthy social life and good social circle. Where in the world did you get this mentality from | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:43 PM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?It is almost like people in general can and do have horrible judgement in who they have children with. Have you never seen the family of 8 walking around whilst the mom is pregnant smoking a cigarette and the dad is buying another 24 pack of pabs blue ribbon? The notion that women in mass are becoming single moms to Thor looking men is 100% delusional | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:42 PM |
| 11 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?It's because, in the current paradigm, sex comes before the relationship, No, this is how it was for the majority of human history. The only places where sex actually didn't or doesn't occur before marriage is typically where there's literal physical punishment for it. But feminism and birth control has made it so that sex comes first before the relationship I think common sense made this occur more than anything. It is a good thing to have sex before marriage, because sexual compatibility is ju… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:39 PM |
| 3 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?When did this belief come around that every single mom is because "Chad" decided not to stick around? Most dead beat dads are losers in every sense of the word lol, where this idea came from that they're all male models is insanity | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:32 PM |
| 2 | Why is it always "female hypergamy" and not shameless male thirst that is complained about?Highly unfortunate | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 11:24 PM |
| 1 | Why are males always the ones who end up isolated and lonely in society?This the complete truth, yet people like OP craft these delusions that every woman out there has a plethora of gentlemen just waiting to sit outside of their window with the boombox playing | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 10:09 PM |
| 15 | What roles do you expect your wife/future wife to play in your relationship?not nagging. Not whining. Not complaining. This makes me think of the sitcom stereotype where the lazy husband sits on his chair watching football, whilst the wife begs for him to have just minimal levels of cleanliness or responsibility. The husband writes her off as always nagging, and the audience laughs at the wife weeping in realization that she married a man baby | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 02:55 AM |
| 2 | What roles do you expect your wife/future wife to play in your relationship?1.Pleasant What do you mean by this | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/06/20 12:39 AM |
| 1 | Do you think women live life on easy mode/tutorial mode, like many red pillers claim?getting murdered It is men who do almost all of the murdering lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/20 11:39 PM |
| 4 | Do you think women live life on easy mode/tutorial mode, like many red pillers claim?The same does not work in reverse, men are not given attention or advantage merely for existing they must develop skills, status, power and money. How is this any different for women? The notion that they can just find a husband to support them is not true for the vast majority. Not only do most women want to have a salary for autonomous reasons, but realistically only men making >100k a year can support a household and kids alone, which is a very tiny number. Marriage, family law and laws in ge… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/20 05:41 PM |
| 1 | Do you think women live life on easy mode/tutorial mode, like many red pillers claim?Willful ignorance doesn't contribute much to the argument, of the small handful of people here citing actual statistics to support their argument, there's a sea of losers crying that women have it easier because none of them swiped right on their 5 creepy selfies | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/20 05:16 PM |
| -1 | Do you think women live life on easy mode/tutorial mode, like many red pillers claim?Women having more options has been one of the main arguments here in that they have it "easier", you must be new here, this isn't a strawman at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/20 05:12 PM |
| 1 | Do you think women live life on easy mode/tutorial mode, like many red pillers claim?Guys who unironically think women have it easier because a bunch of trashy guys on Tinder would fuck them is pure insanity. The fact that many people here say "women can just make an only fans and get rich" are the same people who refer to any woman who has made even eye contact with a man as "tainted" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/20 05:05 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenMy romantic competition is my enemy. Out of the 400+ comments, this might be the cringiest, actual LARP | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 06:00 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI'm a man, I just don't have the same dipshit beliefs as you do lmao. You literally described other men as your "enemy" and seem to be backpedaling from how fucking cringe that is. Do you treat women poorly or something, you're acting like if another man sleeps with a woman prior to you she's been tainted or something. So many of you seem to be projecting the type of porn you watch | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 05:37 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYou literally described other men as your "enemy", that is straight up man in the wild LARP. If you seriously think people in general like people that fraternize with their competition Are you saying you have no friends at all? You sound insane lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 05:29 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenThis could not be further from the truth, we live in the age of society where we aren't each other's "enemies." If you want to label other men as competition when it comes to romance, fine go ahead, but to act as if you're some man in the wild and it's you against the world is pure delusions. It's like you watched half of a lion documentary or something and think you have everything figured out now | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 05:17 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenBut I would bet dollars to donuts there’s some sort of conflict going on in that head. Because I enjoy debates in general, that's like saying anyone who goes to a political sub is unsure about their political opinions. People come here to discuss the topics of dating, sex and everything in between. The fact that you think coming here means you have a problem is clear and simple projecting | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 05:12 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been women"Wahh wahh all women bad and evil", many men will go on and lead very happy and successful relationships with women, while you and the rest of MGTOW cry and sulk in your own personal failures | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 05:04 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenExcept it's not character assassination, it's pointing out the double standards, clear insecurity, and bitterness that many of the guys here are harbouring. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 05:03 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenBecause I feel like it, there's people in the comments who absolutely agree with me, and people who are clearly doing mental hurdles to not address their obvious mental hurdles. I lurk most subs like this because I usually find it entertaining, and make posts like this because I enjoy the discussion it brings. Why you're so desperate for my character assassination is beyond me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:45 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWill do, it will be easy to find you since I'll look for your tears on MGTOW | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:38 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenOr I just think the guys on this sub are mostly braindead because their entire view of women comes from online echo chambers | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYour mentality is seriously ape like, and I can't tell if you're just shitposting | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:29 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI'm a man, the ideas that you're spouting are nonsense. I'm quite confident my current girlfriend is the woman I'm going to marry, and I'm quite confident that it will be a good one too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:28 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenBut you acknowledge that divorce has been on a decreasing trend | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:27 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenFantastic analysis, Freud would be proud of your impeccable psychoanalysis abilities. I'm a guy, my N count is 3, and I am in a serious relationship with a girl who's N count is 7. Anymore dismissable assumptions? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:37 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI stopped reading after the first two paragraphs, this entire article looks like some random woman's anecdote, show me statistics. Rate of divorce is 70% I have absolutely no idea where you got this number from, considering divorce has been on a decreasing trend https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:35 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAnd this doesn't apply to you and men who sleep around because...? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:29 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYou make great points, I wish I had incorporated a lot of what you said into the post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:27 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenKnowing that a woman who fucks my enemy is worthless is as natural to me as drinking water. Are you a caveman | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:25 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenIt is literal textbook hypocrisy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:42 AM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenJust like men don't like sluts right | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 04:41 AM |
| 0 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenhttps://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/marriage-and-mens-health https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/may/25/women-happier-without-children-or-a-spouse-happiness-expert Men overwhelmingly win from marriage compared to women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:19 AM |
| 0 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYou're not even trying to justify your hypocrisy lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:15 AM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenIt will never cease to amaze me the mentality of "yeah that girl is too slutty for me to date seriously, but I'll still fuck her and engage in the same activity I'm shitting on her for!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:04 AM |
| 0 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenMen are territorial and competitive. A man who sleeps with a woman is marking his territory. LTRing a woman who's been marked by dozens of other men just isn't appealing. Bruh what? This is borderline delusional | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:02 AM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWomen do not like fuckboys lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 03:01 AM |
| 0 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenMen are overall happier in marriages than women, and women report that even when they're working full time and making nearly the same salary as their husband, that still share more household responsibilities. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 02:56 AM |
| 5 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been women"Rules for thee but not for me!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 02:47 AM |
| 0 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYou're acting like there's only virgins or girls who have slept with 200 men lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 02:37 AM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWhat an insightful and contributing comment, I'm sure nothing like this has been said in the 400 comments before you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 12:30 AM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI have already gone through the misconception that people have in thinking women want these studs who sleep around and that nonsensical trope and I don't feel like typing it out again, go through the comments | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 12:18 AM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI never said sex was just for fun, I said that it can be mutually exclusive from reproduction. Sex serves an important function and has direct health benefits for the individual, much of the facets of sex do not have anything to do with children. Everything I've mentioned is clear evidence that sex for humans although can lead to reproduction, have many many self serving aspects of it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/20 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAnd yet I have a sneaking suspicion these same men would happily accept an invitation to any hot girl's bed | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 11:42 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYou cannot nurture someone's biological imperatives away. And yet the number of people who have absolutely no desire to have children increases by the day. Obviously some biological things will never change like needing food, but behavior is a whole different ball park. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 11:42 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenThese are all very relevant today. We cannot ignore biology because we believe we are too cultured Notice how I said "many" instincts, which there are. Nowhere did I say we should ignore them all together and try to be robots | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 11:37 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenIt's not really "a necessity." I Yes it is. Not needing to have a ton of children is an incredibly new thing, before when there wasn't nearly as much machinery and the child mortality rate was higher, having lots of kids was a necessity. Whether anyone "desires children" or not has nothing to do with biology. Children are created by sex, so if people have sex, the non-desire of wanting children isn't going to change that. This is factually untrue at all, holy shit. You're actually claiming we ha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 11:34 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenThat's probably due to first-world country luxury, again Is sex for pleasure a first world luxury, or is sex for reproduction a third world necessity? The point is that preventing pregnancy is a billion dollar industry, and people desire sex, types of sex, and sexual scenarios that have absolutely nothing to do with children. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenIf we lived in an idealistic world where people save themselves for marriage, a high N count would be any more than 1. Except people saving themselves for marriage is not an idealistic world, we moved away from it for a reason. I won’t date or even consider marrying a woman who’s had sex with more than 5 men. I wouldn’t date or marry a woman who’s had sex with even 1 woman. Good luck | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 11:13 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAll men are insecure about this particular thing because they cannot be certain of paternity in the way that women are certain of maternity as kids come out of their wombs Except the problem is that on the sub, it is heavily implied that N count is the be all determinant on whether or not your children will actually be yours | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 11:11 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenMaybe insecure men | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:23 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYep your one anecdote just destroyed me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:22 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWhich would seem to imply it's a natural inclination to dislike sluts if it's so common Something being common doesn't necessarily mean it is natural. And if you acknowledge natural doesn't mean good, I don't see what your argument is | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:22 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenThese are regular people in first world countries, you have no proof to them being "defective." Humans as a whole act radically different than we did 1000 years ago, and it's because biology isn't the only thing that influences us, our environment does as well. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:20 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenSo you acknowledge you don't have any evidence and you're arguing from an entirely anecdotal experience? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:15 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI couldn't even tell what point you were trying to make, it was like the writings of a mad man | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:05 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWhy does it weigh so heavily to you, if decided to lose it for yourself? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:04 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenExplain to me why it is not hypocritical for a man to deem being slutty as not relationship material from a woman, if he'd still sleep with those women and be slutty himself. You keep saying different mating strategy but have this strange refusal to expand on anything you're saying. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:03 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI don't know what you want me to say, you sound like a crazy person | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:02 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAight... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 10:00 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWould you accept a woman who became voluntarily celibate but was not a virgin in the same way? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:57 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAight... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:56 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenBecause I'm asking you a specific question and you just cited an incredibly vague wiki page where I'd have to go through multiple pages of text for this incredibly specific example. You didn't even give me a study lmao, you gave me a wiki page. That's like me asking how price gouging affects small business and you handing me an economics 101 textbook, if you're going to use something to backup a very specific claim, tell me where to go on it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:55 PM |
| 4 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenGo back 300 years ago and make the claim that owning other human beings is natural because it's so common | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:53 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenThe people that can have children are having children, and the ones that are stressed (lower - middle class and poverty) are still having children but the desire to not have children is greater than those who are comfortable. This is factually untrue, it is actually lowest end of salaries where we find people with the most children. It is usually people who are more well off, and have plenty of resources that can go into a child, who choose not to. And you'd think that in the age of education an… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:52 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenRead the parenthesis in the post, the entire point is to create a scenario | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:45 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenMany guys feel the same, I think they're just more quiet about it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:45 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenNone of this is relevant. There are millions and increasing of adults around the world who do not want children, end of story. If we were slaves to our biology, this would not occur | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:43 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenTell me where the wiki page explains how it is reasonable for a man to not want a relationship with a slutty despite being a slut himself. The reproductive success aspect is not a valid argument, because guys aren't impregnating multiple women like they used to anymore. You're incapable of an actual logical reasoning so you're trying to use outdated practices as justification | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:42 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAre you literate? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:37 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAre you saving yourself as well? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:37 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI don't think it's idealism at all, sex involves the most sensitive part of your entire body in an incredibly vulnerable way, I don't think it's unreasonable to not to do it with someone you don't know. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:35 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been women"Adults" don't have children when their surrounding environment causes too much stress. Yet the people choosing to not have children are almost exclusively people living in first world countries, where resources and security is bountiful. People are having sex, are they not? There's no separation between "having sex" and "wanting children." https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/yes-other-animals-do-have-sex-for-fun | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:34 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAight... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:28 PM |
| 0 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenLmao holy shit | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:27 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenDespite this interaction occurring through a screen, I can almost see the rusty and cobb webb covered gears in your brain turning frantically to crank out this pitiful damage control. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:27 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenCondescending and shaming at the same time, while invalidating valid reasons and preferences. There is nothing wrong with having insecurities or sometimes being jealous, they are perfectly normal human traits. The point is we could move to a more productive discussion if a lot of the guys here just came clean. The whole "oh well I don't want to marry a slut because I want to make sure my children are mine" do not make sense at all when you pick them apart, and are honestly very transparent | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:20 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI could bring you studies right now about sexual behavior and you would still be in total denial. Please, show them to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:18 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenOh wow so you can't get laid. Am very impressed. I don't have any interest in hookups or sex with complete strangers, and my relationships have been limited because I just graduated with a degree in chemistry. Love how you go from calling me a slut is who "leftovers" to mocking me for only having sex with 3 people. I wonder if your brain is actually capable of admitting to being wrong, or if it forces you to just dig the whole deeper and deeper. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:15 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI'll never stop laughing at this post and calling out the guys who project their failures, just to be met with comments me of having to be some woman who has slept with 100 guys lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:13 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenProbably because educated people spend a lot of their youth learning and building their career | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:12 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenbut it is a factor and quite an important one. I could not disagree more. Maybe the number one obvious factor is if she's actually cheated in a relationship before? From there things like happiness in the relationship, and her character overall have far more of an effect. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:11 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenLol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:10 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenweak genetics self-filter out of the gene pool through their own concious decision making 🤷♂️ The more educated you are, the less likely you are to have children. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:09 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenThe fact that you make wall to wall assumptions about me, despite the fact that I'm a guy who has had sex with only 3 women, all of who I was in a relationship with, makes you the epitome of who I'm calling out in this post. Goodluck being such a jaded and bitter low life | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:08 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYou literally tried to say that it's okay for men to not desire a slutty woman for a relationship, even if he's slutty himself because men and women have different dating strategies. Your entire argument is the age old trope of the guy who sleeps around a lot if a stud and all the women want him, which is nothing more than a shitty Hollywood creation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:07 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenA woman sleeping with 1 or 100 people is going to have far less of an impact on whether or not that child is yours compared to a multitude of factors. Using N count as the be all reason for that argument is transparent and doesn't work | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:04 PM |
| 4 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenTIL having standards and not being interested in leftovers is an insecurity issue. I hope any future romantic interest of yours has the standards to never give a relationship to someone who refers to another person as "leftovers" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 09:02 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenCan you explain to me why millions of adults around the world, as the number is constantly increasing, have absolutely no desire to have children? That's right there defying our most basic instinct out of them all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:57 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenHilarious and original, you're the king of comedy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:55 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenHVM can have Nothing following these words has anything to do with what I said. You're trying to justify men being able to sleep around because of different dating strategies. Women do not like men who sleep around for the sake of sleeping around, women like high valued men, and there is an enormous distinction. Nobody likes Brody who is 37 and has been hitting up the same every club for the last 15 years where he finds some girl drunk enough to convince to have sex with in his shitty apartment.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:52 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenname one reason that is not rooted in weakness of some kind. Sex to me requires an emotional connection, I do not like the idea at all of being with someone in such a vulnerable and intimate way if they're a complete stranger. I've slept with 3 women, all of whom I was in a relationship with, and I've only desired relationships with women who see sex in the same way as I do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:44 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenSo if you want to lead your life where your decision making is controlled so depressingly by basic instincts, feel free to, but you're limiting yourself | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:42 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenNice red herring, too bad it doesn't take away from what I just said | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:41 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenIn women, as a general rule, it is indicative of mental, character, or other flaws/issues that make her worse at maintaining an LTR. This is a factually untrue statement, and it's exhausting seeing how bad you all are at understanding statistics. Of the studies that show a correlation between N count and say, success of a long term relationship, that is CORRELATION. Statistical probability, increases or decreases, but statistical nonetheless. Attempting to use a statistic like that determinantly… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:40 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenHumans are slaves to biologies Our most inherent biological drive is to reproduce, yet there are countless adults who are increasing in percentage that make the active decision to not have children. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:37 PM |
| 6 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenMen don’t want to give their commitment to some who spent their value on tingles... I know that it must be hard for you to believe, but being a high valued male is not the same thing as having as much sex with women as possible. If anyone is spending their value on tingles, it is the absurd amount of men who spend all of their time chasing casual sex when they're not physically appealing enough to be doing so. It will never cease to amaze me how guys on here simultaneously cry about how difficul… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:35 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenRather be ignorant than gay. At least you admit to being willfully stupid | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been women:/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:26 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenHow do you know those scenarios are so rare? It is absolutely imperative for men to ensure that their children are biologically their own. Because we live in a time where birth control and condoms are both in the billions every year in sales. If your child being legitimately yours is a genuine concern, there are an enormous amount of things you should be looking over before you ask about her N count. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:25 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI said slaves, not influenced. At the end of the day our decisions are only made possible because of our genes, but we also have a mind and a conscious. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:23 PM |
| 5 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenMen are almost all of workplace related injuries and deaths. Would it be fair for me to draw from that that men are bumbling idiots who shouldn't be operating machinery at all? No, because it's almost like you should look at the fucking context around a statistic instead of reading and using it at face value. You'll save a lot of time by not looking incredibly ignorant if you do that | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:22 PM |
| 7 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWhat you fail to understand is that men don’t mind to fuck with slut and they would fuck them as much as they could/want. The thing is men don’t want to commit to them. Sluts are like drug users, This mindset could not be more ironic. "Yeah sorry you're a slut and sleep around too much so I don't find you worthy of a relationship, but I'll still engage in hookups with girls like you despite the fact that I'm practicing the exact behavior that I'm claiming to be repulsed by" big brain over here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:19 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAmen to that. N count does not matter, and in the same vein, monogamy and jealousy is a sham as well. I disagree entirely with that. There are legitimate reasons to not want to be with someone with a high N count, and monogamy is completely legitimate | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:16 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenHuman visceral reactions aren't under conscious control, at least not entirely Every visceral reaction is different, but I not only believe but know from experience that they can be overcome if you sit down and truly think about them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:12 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWhat's a high N count to you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:07 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenSome are from what I've read, the whole guy who sleeps around is a stud trope is still around, but I think labels like fuckboy are becoming more negative | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:07 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenDepends, I've seen a guy on here unironically say 3 is too high | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:01 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI never said that there wasn't. There are legitimate reasons to not get with someone who has slept around a lot, the point of this post is to call out a lot of the guys on here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:01 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI said for many of the guys in this sub, which is absolutely true. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 08:00 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAnother fun study: Pregnancy is more common among LGBTPADHD teens than their straight peers. “The message for me is that these populations are often ignored or assumed to not need information or reproductive care or services and they absolutely do,” said Lisa Lindley, the study’s lead author from George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. It's almost like this is in concurrence with pregnancy being higher in states that don't teach sex ed as well. Keep reading those headlines though | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:59 PM |
| 6 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenThere is no stopping Biology. Nature versus nurture is an ongoing debate, we aren't slaves to our genetics | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:46 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenWe're animals and always will be, but being a primitive one is a choice. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:41 PM |
| 4 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenAs with the typical female shaming tactic, they sweep under the rug feelings of insecurity and jealousy as if they're unimportant things I'm a guy, and nowhere did I try to invalidate the legitimacy of insecurity and jealously. Most of the guys on this sub refuse to acknowledge those though, and it is significantly holding back the conversation that could be happen. and I don't have the deep-seated fears of potential cuckoldry Again, cheating is overwhelmingly controlled by other factors than it… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:32 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenFirst off I said the guys in this subreddit, I couldn't care less about cultures that do it because they don't even try to claim that they're logical. What you described has existed in nearly every culture during peak sexist times | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:27 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI can tell what really is illogical: trying to rationalize emotions. It's a waste of time. I could not disagree more. Not every emotion is going to be logical, but abandoning the attempt to rationalize any of them all together is choosing to live like a primitive animal. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:23 PM |
| 9 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenBut it's not acknowledged by so many of the guys here, we could move into a more productive conversation if it was | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:19 PM |
| 6 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenCompletely unhinged lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:15 PM |
| 6 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI never said there was, just that that is one of the actual reasons | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:15 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenEmotions are NOT logical. You're right, but they also don't have to be illogical either. That's the entire purpose of communication, and boards like AITA or relationship advise | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:14 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenReread the title of my post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:13 PM |
| 4 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been women... sound like a woman Hope she sees this bro The "I don't go outside and my entire view of women is based off of confirmation bias filled text boards" starter pack. I wonder if there's a correlation between you getting upset at claims of projecting your dating failures, and then being unable to imagine defending a woman without wanting sex out of it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:11 PM |
| 9 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI think your perception is warped. It, in my sincere experience as a man, is a instinct. And many instincts are irrational or don't have much relevancy in today's world. why go out of their way to look for lower n count women? Because of exactly what I said, so they don't have to be compared to other men. If you wouldn't want a high n count woman because of religious reasons or sex being a more emotional thing to you, that's more understandable, but doesn't apply to many of the guys here. The re… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 07:03 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenSuch as? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:57 PM |
| 3 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenI'm a guy lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:57 PM |
| 1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenHas this subreddit reached such levels of delusions that we're not going to acknowledge how girl on girl is the most popular type of porn in the world and heavily fetishized by men? Your comment doesn't really address anything I've said | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:56 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenOk? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:55 PM |
| 2 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenCaring about physical strength Physical fitness has an enormous benefit for overall well being, being in shape has plenty of relevant reasons for being attractive. Everyone is free to have whatever standards for where to stick their dick / what dick gets stuck in them as they wish. What are you on about here, where did I say you don't have the right to do whatever you want? You remind me of someone being called out for saying some dumb shit and then screaming "WELL I HAVE FREE SPEECH!!!" No one … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:54 PM |
| -1 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenYou are in the minority if we're going on most popular type of porn | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:51 PM |
| 9 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenInstincts are by default, not reasonable. This is my point entirely. I think the bitter and jaded guys on here who could write a master's thesis on why they dislike women with high N counts, are really just angry about other men getting laid and projecting their failures | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:47 PM |
| 4 | Most guys on here wouldn't be bothered by a woman with a high N count if all of her partners had been womenthough you seem all too quick to dismiss "paternity certainty" , a primal reaction, with the RATIONAL cognition of "it is statistically unlikely". The notion that you can be more confident it's yours because she hasn't slept around as much is pretty ridiculous in this day and age. It would come from her actual character more than anything. We have a multitude of primal reactions and instincts that we need to be aware of because they don't have much place in the modern world. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/20 06:45 PM |
| 2 | If "Chad" is stealing "your" women, why are you angry at women instead of attractive men who fuck them or yourself for not being able to compete?Lmao holy shit | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/05/20 04:02 PM |
| 3 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”I literally just said it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/05/20 01:55 PM |
| 2 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”The same applies for men and everyone with their sexuality | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/05/20 01:48 PM |
| 10 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”It's completely relevant. Men want sex on dates as a test of seriousness. This might be the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on this sub. If you think a woman having sex with you when you were a stranger 3 hours ago is a sign she's serious about dating, I genuinely cannot comprehend where your mind is at. If she has sex then it's very likely she likes him. If you need having sex to be the sign that she likes you, again I genuinely cannot comprehend where your mind is at. Her body language, t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 11:31 PM |
| 5 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”The clear pent up anger so many of them have and the way they genuinely get off to seeing a woman's life ruined for doing something as simple as posting a nude online without the face showing. I remember watching a nature documentary where this fat male walrus was so sexually frustrated that he'd try to rape animals around him and that's what they honestly remind me of. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 11:19 PM |
| 4 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”I never said that doesn't happen, it isn't relevant to the topic though, so nice try at derailing my argument | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 11:13 PM |
| 4 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”What do you think is the end result? Math hun, math. You're quite arrogant for someone who doesn't know shit about math. First off, tinder could not be a less accurate representation of the real world. Men overwhelmingly outnumber women on there, and on top of that countless men swipe right on everything because they're looking for a hookup. Second of all, I literally just graduated college. All the girls weren't "flocking" to sports players lmao, you sound like you watch TV and never leave your… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 11:12 PM |
| 3 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”Each man that a woman is having casual sex with, has at least 3 other women at any given time in his rotation. This is not an exaggeration. Where is the evidence for this claim | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 10:41 PM |
| 8 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”A woman that sleeps with 1 man is marriage material — a woman that sleeps with 100 is not. That is your opinion and preference. I never said you can't have either of those, if you wouldn't marry a woman who has slept with 100 guys then don't, I'm talking about If you actively look down on her or judge in that manner. The stigma still exists and women are slut all of the time still | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 10:27 PM |
| 7 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”They vilify every single mom on dating apps, they brigaded r/badwomensanatomy with photoshopped pictures of vaginas because they genuinely believe a woman gets "mileage" from being "used up" and so on. It is genuinely run by angry, bitter men who project their romantic failures into hatred for women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 10:24 PM |
| 9 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”The subreddit claims that its goal is to point out women who made poor dating choices at a young age, and then say all men are bad. Lurk the sub longer, they've brigaded posts from r/relationship_advice where a women's boyfriend found out she slept around in college. The post was filled with enormous amounts of hate filled comments until the post was locked and most of them were banned. A few posts in and that sub may not seem all that bad, but stick around long enough and you'll see that the th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 10:22 PM |
| 8 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”I never said someone shouldn't be judged for their decisions, I was saying women fought to not be judged for their personal choice in how they express their sexuality in terms of who they choose to be with | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 10:06 PM |
| 9 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”Look into the comments, in the men who have these twisted revenge fantasies, who genuinely love seeing women get rejected, who all clearly have insane sexist beliefs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 10:04 PM |
| 6 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”Its either that or improve to the point they can keep a man. That's why this sub is awful for advice. It's always go through a herculean effort to improve every facet of your life, or lower your standards. Not that improving youref is bad, but there's an enormous lack of advice to switch your entire environment and the people you'd be seeing on a regular basis. I can promise you that networking is not just the main determinant of relationships, but all social aspects too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 08:33 PM |
| 9 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”There's definitely an imbalance with obviously more attractive guys getting laid more, but the notion that for every 100 women are 10 guys are sleeping with them is pretty absurd | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 08:31 PM |
| 7 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”Because that's not what the sub is about anymore, they literally try and find any women to focus their bitter, jaded hatred on and I'd be terrified for any woman who dated them in real life. The way they talk about women and their decisions sounds borderline dangerous and the sub honestly should be quarantined. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 08:30 PM |
| 1 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”We're not allowed to simply comment? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 08:28 PM |
| 8 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”The 800 pound gorilla in the room - has the feminist imperative to have women sexually liberated and adapt the promiscuity that men display been good for women? The sexual liberation as no point was "go be like men and try to have as much casual sex as possible!" But was about women not being controlled or judged for whatever decisions she makes, whether that's to sleep with 1 men or one hundred. Sure, it sounds shallow that the only reason men wanted to be "good men" (from a woman's perspective… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 07:45 PM |
| 7 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”I wasn't using the manosphere as a trump card, I'm pointing out that there is a massive contradiction between how most relationships exist in the real world and what these subreddits think is happening. This post is not about demanding that every woman get some ripped model boyfriend, it's how this sub's immediate answer to a woman struggling to get commitment as demanding she dates uglier men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 07:40 PM |
| 9 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”Incorrect. If the caliber of attractiveness of that a hooking up with is roughly identical, and none will commit, it’s because the men are above her and she doesn’t realize it. A lot of men simply do not want to put up with a relationship, but will do whatever is necessary or put on whatever behavior is required to get sex. This sub puts all of the blame on women for trying to secure the best looking man that she can, whilst completing ignoring that plethora of men in general who gaslight women,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 07:32 PM |
| 7 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”I've seen enough women respond with "Where have all the good men gone?" Where exactly have you seen women saying that, that god awful subreddit? The manosphere in subs like this spend way too much out of their day finding niche examples on the internet to confirm their delusional worldview. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 07:26 PM |
| 21 | Saying “If you want commitment, go for less desirable guys” is like saying “If you want commitment, go for guys who can’t do any better.”If you're a woman struggling to obtain commitment, the best and most effective method is to find men in an environment who are more likely to want to commit. The fact that so much of the knee jerk reaction is "well you'd get commitment if you stopped just having sex with all of these ripped model guys!" Is the result of strange delusions this sub has created. Most women are average, hooking up with average guys, and struggling to get commitment from usually average guys. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/20 07:21 PM |
| 2 | Q4A: Why is desire for young women (legal age or older) singled out and not treated like any other standard?I'm not trying to doubt your experiences, but it sounds like you and a lot of the guys here have simply been around the wrong women. Believe it or not, only a very small percent of the population both men and women participate in hookups. Most women despite having access to it, do not participate in them because they usually don't get anything out of it. Men and women are not a monolith, and the red pill breeds this horrible mentality that every girl is out chasing chad. They're not. Plenty are … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/04/20 12:55 PM |
| 7 | Q4A: Why is desire for young women (legal age or older) singled out and not treated like any other standard?I'm 23 and cannot imagine ever dating an 18 year old now, I cannot fathom how someone 5 or 10 years older than me would want that. I've changed so much since 18, and experienced an enormous amount of things and felt myself mature more. I've learned more about who I am, what I want, the things I want to accomplish etc. I'm not it's impossible for an 18 year old to know any of that, but the thought of ever being with one is simply uncomfortable. If you're 30+ and actively seeking out only 18-22 gi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/04/20 02:05 AM |
| 2 | The SAHM/Homemaker role is great. Women gave away their happiness and power by choosing to work for a corporation insteadThank you. And this guy doesn't realize that countless people have gotten married despite "vetting." It's almost like countless people change throughout the course of a marriage in a way that cannot be predicted, which leads to divorce. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/04/20 05:46 PM |
| 9 | Q4A: Why is desire for young women (legal age or older) singled out and not treated like any other standard?I don't think anyone is saying that if an older guy happens to end up with a younger woman, he's a predator/manipulator, if anyone is saying that then they're wrong. This is about men who only seek out younger women, which is justifiably strange to many people because they're in such enormously different life stages. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/04/20 05:32 PM |
| 3 | Q4A: Why is desire for young women (legal age or older) singled out and not treated like any other standard?I like being dominant in a relationship so for anything serious I'll need a soft spoken submissive women who won't constantly challenge me. Sounds like you don't want a serious relationship, but a maid you want to fuck. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/04/20 05:29 PM |
| 1 | What is the point in moral policing people's preferences?Prove to me that Kanye's album prevents women from desiring men who make more than them. Also, not all women who prefer wealthier and more educated men are gold diggers. Explain to me why you think this is the case? You said why is nobody going out and moral policing that double standard, and I just provided an example of how it's a pretty commonly known double standard that people are aware of. If you would prefer a man that makes more money than you, that is entirely different from making it a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 06:55 PM |
| 1 | What is the point in moral policing people's preferences?The entire idea of heterosexual dating is inherently desiring someone who holds themselves to a different standard than yourself. We're talking about entirely separate things. If you wouldn't date a woman who doesn't shave your legs, when yours are hairy, that wouldn't make you a hypocrite so much as it would be demanding standard grooming expectations from women but not following those of men. There are certainly different standards in that aspect that are acceptable. What I'm talking about is … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 06:53 PM |
| 1 | What is the point in moral policing people's preferences?Hypocritical expectations are inherent in dating. Not necessarily, they're probably prevalent for a lot of people, but you're acting like hypocrisy is an unavoidable aspect. Similarly, there is no bloopy moral police that breaks up women for having hypocritical wealth expectations. Isn't Kanye and Jay Z's song "Gold Digger" a Platinum seller? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 06:41 PM |
| 3 | What is the point in moral policing people's preferences?You're talking about my post, and the reason why people should care about pointing out hypocritical expectations from dating is because that person is likely setting themselves up for failure. The word "debate" is literally in this sub's name so I created the post to debate my claim. I don't understand why you're complaining about posts that serve the very purpose of what this subreddit was intended for | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 06:34 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.That's completely fine, I don't understand this entire argument when we're talking about 2 different things | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 06:27 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.My argument is that we sleeping toghether does not take precedence over other traits. I never said it did. I never said that if you'd sleep with a woman who you wouldn't be in a relationship with, that that would make you a hypocrite. I said that if your ONLY reason for not being in a relationship with her is because she sleeps around, and NO OTHER REASON, but you'd still sleep with her, then that would make you a hypocrite. If you'd sleep with a woman but wouldn't he in a relationship with her … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 03:59 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.The reason male promiscuity is accepted is because women find men that get around more attractive. This is a sweeping generalization, and there are plenty of women turned off by men who sleep around. No woman can truly be incel, so they've don't understand how easy it is to not date as a man, usurped the definition and transformed it into being the worst possible thing a person can be. Worse than Ted Bundy, worse than Hitler, worse than all 17 or whatever 9/11 hijackers combined. What the fuck a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 03:23 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Comprendre? It's not that being a slut disqualifies you, it's that you look for other things in a long term partner...things that when you're just fucking around don't come up. And if you found out she was all of those things you mentioned that you want out of a long term partner, and she checked every box, but your ONLY reason for not entering a relationship with her is because she sleeps around, then you would be a hypocrite to still sleep with her. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 03:21 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Men are almost always dating and fucking down, which is why male promiscuity is not an indication of wheter or not they will seek better opportunities. This is not true at all. The only reason it is more accepted in our society is because of the long history of shaming women's sexuality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 05:05 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You're trying to overcomplicate a very simple point. You cannot have your cale and eat it too. If you would not be in a relationship with a woman strictly because she sleeps around, clearly you find sleeping around as something wrong enough to be a deal breaker. If you would still sleep with her though, the same activity you consider a deal breaker, then you are a hypocrite. You are setting a standard that you expect from someone in order to be in a relationship with, that you do not follow. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/04/20 02:57 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It is mutually exclusive. If you want a relationship with someone who doesn't sleep around, and you're willing to sleep around, you're a hypocrite. It just happens that people that are good business people aren't that fun to drink with in general. Are you implying people who sleep around aren't good in relationships? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 07:00 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If you demand a behavior from someone for a relationship that you yourself don't follow, that is not mutually exclusive, you're a hypocrite. If you wouldn't be in a relationship with a woman for the sole reason that she sleeps around, but you'd still sleep with her and engage in the very activity you are making a deal breaker, that makes you a hypocrite. If you had a drinking buddy who would be a great business partner in every way, and you decide you don't want him to be for the sole reason tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 05:59 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.And that would make you a hypocrite. You're agreeing to the very activity that you find him not worthy for | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 05:45 PM |
| 3 | Don't go for the women spending their "prime years" going for Alphas. Why is this so hard for guys to do?"She has to be the reserved girl on the streets, but a freaky slut for me!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 03:08 PM |
| 7 | Is the quarantine affecting women more than men?STEM is overwhelmingly liberal. Look at the political affiliation of scientists | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 02:55 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.How would accounting for all of the data points show a higher correlation for women. Again I fail to see how anything you're talking about proves your point. You're not acknowledging the fact that the only time men's happiness doesn't decrease appears to be an outlier, whereas women's is jumping up and down | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 02:30 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.How | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 02:22 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.And they're wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 02:16 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I said that it is hypocritical if you would not be in a relationship with a woman for the sole reason that she sleeps around if you would still sleep with her. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 02:15 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.In your own words | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 02:14 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.That's what you are saying - having fun with someone obligates you to trust them with half your future. Nope that is not what I'm saying at all, reread the post. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:33 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.How is it not hypocritical that they hold to their partner to a standard that they themselves do not follow | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:32 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Agreed, I was literally pointing out a dynamic that has existed and continues to, that some like and some hate. I don't understand you, you're unbelievably strange | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:21 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.And? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:20 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.???? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:14 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.This post is about a hypocritical behavioral standard that some people have in which they themselves do not follow but still expect from a partner. I don't know what the fuck you're talking about, or how I could make this simpler | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:13 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Because of intimacy and emotional connection? This post is about men who would not date a woman who sleeps around, but would still sleep with her. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:02 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Chase has been used for the last century, it is meant to represent the dynamic is which the man initiates everything while the woman plays hard to get | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 06:00 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You do not understand what my post is saying | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 05:54 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.That's how it is commonly referred to? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 05:53 AM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Explain how what I said is not valid. How taking the highest and lowest end points, taking their y axis difference, and diving by the x axis difference, would not conclude that men are statistically more negatively effected by sleeping around. That is literally what we would do in chemistry | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 05:52 AM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'm asking you how that would prove women are being more negatively effected by partner increase count from one. I'm running through it and do not see you're drawing that conclusion | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 02:22 AM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.The decreases will be steeper because there are several more increases throughout the series. I don't even understand what you're trying to prove | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 01:34 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You do not understand what my post is saying | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/04/20 01:24 AM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Acknowledging that you're being a hypocrite, unfair etc and not caring is an unhealthy mentality | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:59 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Absolutely | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:58 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I never said you can't have different standards for hookups and a relationship. The problem is that the standard in which you are not interested in a relationship with that woman over, is one you are not meeting yourself. You are agreeing to a behavior that you yourself find undesirable from a long term partner. I probably wouldn't marry a woman who sleeps around, because I view sex differently. I'm consistent in my beliefs because I don't sleep around, and hold myself to the same standards that… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:57 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.The point is that is hypocritical to not date a woman for the sole reason that she sleeps around, when you would still sleep with her | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:50 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her."Yeah I wouldn't date the slut, I don't like that she sleeps around a lot is willing to jump in bed with any guy, but I'd still sleep with her and jump in her bed, even though that's what I'm deeming her not relationship material over!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:32 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.By the fascist dogwhistling subs you're active in, it's pretty easy to tell. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:31 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.https://ifstudies.org/blog/does-sexual-history-affect-marital-happiness Men with 1 lifetime sexual partner are 71% likely to be happy in their marriage. Men with 21+ partners are 59% likely to be happy in their marriage. Women with 1 lifetime sexual partner are 64% likely to be happy in their marriage, and women with 21+ partners are 57% likely to be happy in their marriage. That's a 12% difference for men, and a 7% difference for women. That means men are actually much more likely to be unhappy… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:30 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yes there is. If you believe that a woman who sleeps around is not relationship material because she sleeps around, and you yourself sleep around, you are the literal definition of a hypocrite. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:27 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You do not understand the point of this post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:26 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.So a group about equality for women shouldn't attempt to say how it's equal and fair for women to sleep around, but should instead start calling certain men whores. Yeah that's definitely going to be successful and get a lot of guys on their side | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:08 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.That's not what I said at all. Reread my post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 11:07 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Please inform me on what would happen. You are wrong | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:55 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yep because you're definitely a champion of LGBTQ rights and definitely weren't using that as a clearly derogatory term for women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:54 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Every data point except for men except for one had happiness decreasing as sexual partners went up. For every point for women where happiness decreases as sexual partners went up, there was another for happiness going up as sexual partners went up. The only reason the average decline was higher for women than men is because several of the points for women are inclines, rather than declines. I'm 2 weeks away from a bachelors in chemistry, I've had to do enormous amounts of statistical analysis fo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:49 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Your entire understanding of women is the result of online echo chambers. The reason why it is more socially acceptable for men to brag about sex, is because we are from and still in a culture that shames women's sexuality, whilst glorifying men's. How many stories feature a rugged male protagonist who sleeps around, is stoic and fits that boring trope that countless men fantasize as being. Also even though it is less acceptable for a woman to talk about being promiscuous, you are delusional if … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:34 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.No, you're trying to argue that men can have this double standard and play the best of both worlds. Personally I probably wouldn't marry a woman who sleeps around, sex to me requires an emotional connection and the thought of doing it with a stranger freaks me out. I wouldn't marry that woman because we have enormously different beliefs on sex. The difference between me and the guys I'm talking about, is I don't try to parrot this bull shit notion that a woman sleeping around is an undesirable s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:30 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'm a man dipshit, keep grasping at straws diaper boy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:25 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It doesn't make you a hypocrite. It does. If you would not be in a relationship with a woman for the sole reason that she sleeps around, clearly you have a belief that sleeping around is in some aspect immoral and thus a deal breaker. If however you'd still sleep with her, you are agreeing to engage in the exact same behaviors that you deemed her not relationship material for. Unless you acknowledge that that makes you equally not relationship material, then you're a hypocrite. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:16 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I am | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:13 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I never once said you can't have different standards for hooking up and long term relationships. I said that if the only reason you wouldn't be in a relationship with a girl is because she sleeps around, but you'd sleep with her, then you are a hypocrite. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:08 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'v explained to you the reason why many men hate women with high n counts, it's typically men with low n counts themselves, maybe my view point is wrong but regardless it's what many men believe to be true. Except the problem is these men want a woman who doesn't sleep around, at the same time labeling women who do sleep around as "pump and dump" material. They essentially believe it's okay for them to sleep around, but when women do it, they're not deserving of a relationship | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:06 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'm a man, idiot. That guy literally acknowledges that he doesn't care about being a hypocrite or being logically consistent, what other response is there other than to wish him luck finding someone when he's clearly a selfish asshole. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 10:03 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yes it would be, but this sub isn't dominated by women with beta orbiters. It's dominated by red pilled men who have the mentality that I'm calling out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:56 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Because it's the only appropriate response to such a crybaby comment. "Wahh women who sleep around bad" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:55 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.And if you wouldn't marry one simply because she sleeps around, but you'd still sleep with her, you're a hypocrite. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:50 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Women have already expressly indicated that men sleeping around is not a problem unless it's cheating. Where exactly did you get this information from? I wasn't aware that you polled every woman in the world. What you don't understand is that we're coming from an incredibly sexist culture that for the longest time shamed women's sexuality and glorified men who slept around. There are many women who hate this double standard, and that's been one of the biggest aspects of the modern feminist movem… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:47 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I dismissed it because like him, a dozen other commenters simply brought up double standards from women that serve no purpose but to try and derail what I'm saying here. The purpose of this post is crystal clear yet there's countless red herring fallacies. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:31 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.This post exists because his sub is predominantly men, and many of whom I've seen literally have this mentality. That they can sleep around and be worthy of relationships, but women who sleep around are pump and dump material | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:28 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.His example went on to say that a woman in general wanting her man to make more money is hypocritical, which I said is not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:27 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.This post is about men who would not date a woman who has slept around for that sole reason, but he himself sleeps around. I literally said in the post that if you're someone who wouldn't date a woman who has slept around, because you value sex differently, then that's perfectly fine. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:26 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.And I said that that would make her a hypocrite. I said her taking care of the home or simply not making as much money wouldn't make her a hypocrite | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:24 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Double standards are always wrong. "They do it too so I'll do it!" Is a toddler mentality | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:18 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.How do you expect to be taken seriously when your first comment is just obvious projection of your romantic failures | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:16 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Because his example is not the definition of hypocrite that I literally just provided. That's what he and you are not understanding | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:12 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If you believe a woman sleeping around is immoral and therefore wouldn't date her because of it, while you yourself sleep around, that is textbook hypocrisy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:09 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her."Does it burn when you pee?" Real pinnacle of comedy over there | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:07 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.hy·poc·ri·sy /həˈpäkrəsē/ Learn to pronounce noun the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. A man not wanting to date a woman who sleeps around because he finds something aboutit immoral, but sleeps around himself, is a textbook hypocrite. I don't care about your example at all, because it's not comparable to mine | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:07 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yet men's happiness in marriage is statistically more negatively affected by sleeping around than women's | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:02 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'm still laughing at your original comment. I'm shocked it's grammatically correct with all the tears that were clearly streaming down your face as you typed it, that definitely would have made me have a typo or two. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 09:00 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Do you need your diaper changed lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:54 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You literally don't understand what you're talking about. The only reason the average declines are higher for women than than men is because there are several points where the happiness INCREASES. Love how you try to use average decline by declines themselves, rather than decline point by point. It is statistically impossible for women to have an average appoint by point decline that is greater than men when their slope is smaller. That's what the slope is lmao. You're just upset that your own s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:52 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Not sure if you don't understand that the near sinusoidal pattern from the women's graph will make the R<sup>2</sup> value much lower, hurting the overall accessibility of how well correlated the results are. On top of that, there's a strong likelihood that the 6-10 marker for men would be treated as an outlier, making their negative regression R<sup>2</sup> value higher. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:42 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Does it exhibit an overall steeper negative slope (ie are the average percentage declines in happiness significantly greater)? Yes. This is factually incorrect if you're talking about women. Men's overall Y axis change is -12%, with the x axis change of 21 people. That gives men a slope of -0.57%/partner. Do the math for women and it is -0.33%/partner. From your source, men's happiness in marriage is more negatively affected from sleeping around than it is for women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:31 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If you're asking if there's women who hookup with guys but wouldn't be in a relationship with them for the some reason that the guy sleeps around, I'm sure it exists but probably not as prevalent as guys. I didn't make this post trying to claim that there aren't many women with hypocritical double standards, I made this post because a lot of guys on here have the mentality that I'm calling out | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:26 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It is literal textbook hypocrisy. It's like demanding your partner be hygienic when yourself don't shower | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:23 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.This post is about men who would not be in a relationship with a woman for the sole reason that she sleeps around a lot. He would still sleep with her though, even though that kind of behavior is what he thinks makes her not worthy of commitment. That is hypocritical | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:08 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Having lots of children was only seen as a good thing when infant mortality was high and the average life span was below 50 years old. Being high value isn't about reproducing as much as possible anymore. You're using an archaic system | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 08:06 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You're stupid for not understanding what I'm saying | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:57 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Dude I'm staring at the graph. The only point that happiness doesn't decrease as sexual partners increases for men is at the 6-10 marker. Everything else looks like a large or small decrease in happiness. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:57 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It's also why women PREFER men that are desired by other women, aka have high-N counts. This is a sweeping generalization. If you go to r/relationship_advise, there's been plenty of posts about women uncomfortable upon discovering their boyfriend's past. The problem with your logic is you're applying incredibly old evolutionary behaviors to modern society. High value isn't about having children anymore, there's plenty of deadbeat people sitting on welfare barely able to afford their 9 kids becau… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:55 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Epic roast dude, why don't you tell that one to your fiance | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:51 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.This post is about men who would not be in a relationship with a woman, for the sole reason that she sleeps around, but he would still sleep with her | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:51 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.How does that same logic not apply to men who sleep around? If some model guy decides to sleep around rather than marry, how is that also not signs of something mental going on, as you claim it is for women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:48 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'm a man | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:47 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Because there is a strong regressive linear negative correlation with women but not for men. A man with 3, or 5, or 8, or 10 previous partners is not statistically likely to be any less satisfied with marriage than a man with only 1 previous partner What are you talking about?? I'm literally staring at it right now, the likelihood a man is happy in a marriage goes down when sexual partners increases. The difference in happiness likelihood between men with 1 partner and 21+ is 12%. The difference… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:45 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'm a man | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:41 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.No, this post is about men who would not be in a relationship with a woman for the sole reason that she has slept around, but would still sleep with her. They are doing exactly what they deem her unworthy of a relationship over, whilst viewing themselves as worthy still. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:40 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.So if you're a guy who has slept around, your mental state is questionable because you're obviously attractive enough to find a woman who will settle down with you, but you choose to keep sleeping around? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:21 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.They are often good providers, husbands, lovers, and fathers. This is literally baseless. You're just making assumptions to fit your narrative with nothing to back them up. High-n women are women all over the spectrum in terms of value, but for them, sex was an impulsive, careless act with no premeditation. Explain how that is different for a man? You've gone from trying to make up different rules for yourself, to bordering straight up sexism. Why should I risk everything on a girl that is more … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:18 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.because attractive women don't need to be slutty. Lmao what? What are you even trying to say here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:11 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.No guy "respects" a guy who gets laid. Do you not go outside? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:10 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.How does your edit not make my argument even stronger? Men who have only had 1 partner are 71% likely to be happy in their marriage, whereas those with 21+ are 59% likely to be happy. Women who have only had 1 partner are 64% likely to be happy, whereas those with 21+ partners are 57% likely. This means that the man who has slept around is 12% less likely to be happy, whereas the woman who has slept around is 7% less likely to be happy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 07:08 PM |
| -1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yes, CORRELATED. As in more or less likely, that is entirely different from black and white claims of if she's slept around, she has automatically destroyed her pair bonding ability and will inevitably cheat. You're a moron who doesn't understand what they're talking about | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:57 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yes, it is fine, you don't owe anyone a relationship. In summary, this post is to call out men who wouldn't marry a slut, but would gladly behave like one thinking the rules don't apply to them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:55 PM |
| 0 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.The whole "pump and dump" paradigm isn't so much advocated for as much Take a look at r/whereareallthegoodmen, it advocates for pump and dump enormously. The red pill has undeniably merged with pickup artist culture. not a chance. the thing to understand here is that they are ALREADY BEING HURT. I understand that, it's setting them up for more failure to sacrifice so much for casual hookups. It's interesting how I've never encountered a single red pill success story, despite lurking for a long t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:54 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.No, what I am saying is that I can engage in sexual interaction seriously with someone who does not and without hypocrisy not wish to partner with someone because they do not take sexual interaction seriously. What exactly do you mean by this? If you're having a sexual encounter with someone who you are not in a relationship with, and have no emotional connection to, you're engaging in casual sex. Engaging in casual sex, and not wanting a partner who does, is hypocritical | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:50 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.The problem is they're not doing what's best for them though. Yeah it may help in the short term with the boost from getting laid, and I'm no psychologists, but the approach to women that so much of the redpill advocates for is seriously harmful for their mental wellbeing in the long run | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:33 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Again this is not an accurate example. You're using casual as casual hookup, and seriously as relationship. When you say you wouldn't ride with someone seriously who is casual, you're saying you wouldn't want a relationship with someone who only wants to hook up, which is common sense. Again this example would be like you're someone who enjoys casually riding, and serious riding. A rider approaches you wanting to ride seriously, but you deny them because you learn that just like you, they have a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:30 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It is. You're demanding a type of behavior from a moral standpoint out of someone, whilst not following it yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:21 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If I demanded my partner be hygienic, whilst I barely showered, I'd be a hypocrite. Demanding your partner not sleep around while you would gladly sleep around, makes you a hypocrit. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:19 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It would be a lie. I literally quoted exactly what you said. "Plus, I can parrot the same bullshit about the past being the past and how I’m reformed, etc. And hopefully I’d be a good enough boyfriend and partner that they can look past that stuff." The fact that you call it bullshit, and the statements you made about trying to find loyalty out of girls who have slept around, shows that you think that someone who has slept around cannot change. Based off of what you said, you are either a psycho… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:16 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It's not about sleeping with someone you wouldn't want a relationship with, it's about not wanting a relationship with them strictly because they sleep around, yet willing to sleep with them despite that behavior being what makes them not relationship material in your eyes. What is so hard to grasp about that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:13 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It sounds like you have internalized the delusions of r/whereareallthegoodmen. The women you described exist, and definitely buried themselves by poor decisions, but I cannot help but think that believing this to be the standard behavior of women, is not the result of staying inside all day. Walk around a mall and you can see couples of all ages where they're sometimes equally attractive, sometimes the guy is hotter, sometimes the girl is etc | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:11 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.The function of a toilet seat is to be urinated or shit in. This analogy is either poorly thought out, or you have insanely misogynistic beliefs | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:08 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.No. What I'm talking about is a type of behavior that spans all genders and is controllable. What you're talking about is a relationship dynamic with roles. You're twisting my words and trying to make an argument out of something not related to mine | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:07 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I have never played golf in my life so maybe this is a communication error because I'm not understanding what you mean by casual or golf club standards. The point is that it is hypocritical of you to demand a type of behavior that is universal across all genders, from a relationship partner, whilst not following them yourselves. It's like demanding a hygienic partner when you only shower once a month | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:05 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I think hookups are awful, and I cannot see myself every being with someone who engaged in a lot of them. But I'm consistent and also wouldn't sleep with them, because I value sex differently. The point of this post is to call out the men who think they can have those demands whilst sleeping around still. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:03 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her."Plus, I can parrot the same bullshit about the past being the past and how I’m reformed, etc. And hopefully I’d be a good enough boyfriend and partner that they can look past that stuff." I want you to recognize right now how horrible you sound right here. You just admitted that you to a girl you'd supposedly love and cherish, would have no problem basing your entire relationship on a lie. Not only do you have no problem with it, but you also hope that by being a good enough partner, you gaslig… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 06:02 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If you would not be in a relationship with a woman for the sole reason that she sleeps around a lot, while you yourself would be willing to sleep with her or any girl who says yes to you, you are a hypocrite. How hard it is for you, or how easy it is for her, does not change this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:58 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If you demanded your partner makes 100k while you sit home and do nothing, that would be hypocritical, but if you want to be a homemaker and want your husband to be the breadwinner, that wouldn't be hypocritical. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:55 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.it is rather naive to suggest that the validation we feel for achieving our greatest evolutionary prerogative can be substituted so easily Fair point, but I think it is morally bankrupt that many red pill advocates, who are undeniable bitter and want revenge against the women who they couldn't obtain, advocate for vulnerable men who you're describing, to treat so many women in such a degrading manner. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:54 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Sleeping around isn't about skills or difficulty, it is about pleasure. If women orgasmed just as easily as men, we'd probably have 50 billion people by now by the sheer amount of casual sex going on. I've addressed your argument in other comments below | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:51 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I don't think they do, men are wired to bang as many women as possible The age old argument that it's okay for men to sleep around because evolutionarily, that's what occurred. Why is it that when you apply that to women, who evolutionarily only mated with the strongest, most capable males, then suddenly this sub loses their shit? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:49 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Your analogy is not the same as mine. If it was you yourself would be a casual player. As a casual player, you play with other casual players and have your fun. But when it comes to inviting them to your actual club, aka the relationship, you do not invite them because they are too casual, and it is reserved for better player. It is hypocritical of you however because you yourself are a very casual player, and not good at all, but you demand from other players to be good, and to not be casual, i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:46 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Probably because you're not in their social circle. Truth is, if you're browsing subs like this, you're probably not nor knowing the guys like that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:39 PM |
| 0 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.No, I don't think you understand your own analogy. Only one person can be the breadwinner, only one person can be the one who stays at home. Just like it wouldn't be hypocritical to want a dominant man, when you're submissive, because only one can be dominant and only one can be submissive overall. Your analogy involves mutually exclusive roles, mine involved a behavior that both parties can independently control. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:38 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.The difficulty of getting laid doesn't change anything here. This argument keeps being used when it's not an argument. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:35 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.No, it's wrong that you would deny someone a relationship strictly because they sleep around, but you'd still sleep with them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:34 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.At some level the male reaction doesn't have to be rational. It's an instinctual "ick" factor. We have irrational instincts about many things, and it's important to recognize their irrationality. That's the steps from going to a caveman to a civilized man, not operating off of instincts alone. but you can't expect men to easily change what is an instinctual reaction. I completely agree, I definitely struggle with my own. There seems to be a lot of men here however who use them as an excuse to no… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:34 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.And do you have any proof that these exact same aspects don't exist in men who sleep around as well? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:31 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I have no idea what you're talking about. This post is about pointing out the double standard of not wanting to be in a relationship with a woman strictly because she has slept around, if you yourself would actively say yes to hookups as well. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:30 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.There are countless average men who engage in casual sex hookups. The difference is that they spend every weekend at clubs and bars shooting their shot, and not spending it on reddit. None of what you said is an actual argument, or changes any of what I said. How difficult or easy it is for you or someone else to get laid, does not make it acceptable for you to be able to sleep around, but they can't. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:29 PM |
| 0 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If I made personal hygiene a dealbreaker, and my girlfriend must shower 3 times a day, but I only shower once a month, I would be a hypocrite. It does not matter if I found a woman who shockingly agreed to those terms, I'd still be a hypocrite. I don't know what you don't understand about the definition, it is about behavior | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:26 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.a fuckboy is a high value man who sleeps around and that women seek for further commitment. I wouldn't say so anymore. With Tik Tok and guys just doing it in plain sight now, it's definitely becoming negative. Sure you have girls who swoon over him, just like you have guys who drool over OnlyFans girls, but it looks like we're catching up with disliking guys who fuck around. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:24 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Again, you just setup an entirely bias scenario. What if the girl who slept around a lot was faithful in every relationship, and just liked casual sex when she wasn't in them? Why is the girl who hasn't slept around as much automatically faithful? Overall it's understandable that a man wouldn't want to marry a girl who has slept around, as he fears her sleeping with a hotter guy. Just like it's understandable that a woman wouldn't want to marry a guy who slept around, because she's afraid he'll … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:22 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If she wants to share it relatively indiscriminately then why not allow her to share it with you? Just because a man may choose to do so doesn’t mean that he owes her a shot a committed relationship... I'm not saying he owes her a relationship. There are a million reasons why two people might not he compatible for that, but still agree to sleep with each other. My point is to men who would make her sleeping around as the sole dealbreaker | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:17 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.There are many average men who sleep around a lot because they go to the club every weekend and shoot their drunken shot to drunken women. The idea this sub has built up that if you're a man who has slept around, that you must be some suave James Bond like guy is nonsense. There's a reason the term "fuckboy" is continuously becoming more negative. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:15 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If you think getting laid is so important that you're willing to sacrifice your mental well being, I don't think you have enough going on in your life. I know it sounds cheesy as fuck, but in my opinion the best solution to this kind of thing is to get involved with something bigger than yourself. The problem with the red pill is that the followers seem to sit in their room all day sulking in their inability to get laid. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:14 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.What I’m trying to say is, using people is not wrong, or right. Morality is a concept created to keep the masses in check. The truth is, the people who win at life are just really good at manipulating people (both for the better or for the worse). You can choose to accept it and play along or refuse but the reality will remain. This is just the world we live in. Those who are most willing to exploit the system profit. I disagree with this with every fiber of my being. People have an inherent mor… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:12 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Saying that it is harder for men to sleep around does absolutely nothing for your argument, I addressed this below. Name any negative aspect of a woman sleeping around that doesn't apply to a man. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:10 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Plenty can overlook it. Plus, I can parrot the same bullshit about the past being the past and how I’m reformed, etc. And hopefully I’d be a good enough boyfriend and partner that they can overlook that stuff. Do you not realize how much of a hypocritical psychopath you sound like? "Yeah I'm going to find this precious little innocent girl and tell her it was just a phase. Hopefully she believes me and our entire relationship is built on a lie because I do not want to face the fact that I engage… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:09 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.What? I'm talking about setting a controllable behavior as a deal breaker for a relationship, where that person themselves does not follow that behavior. It is textbook hypocrisy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:07 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If you found a woman who you were compatible with for a relationship, but did not want to pursue it strictly because you found out she sleeps around a lot, there must be negative attributes you believe exist in sleeping around, that make a relationship nonviable. If you believe that at the same time, it is acceptable for you to still sleep with her, and to sleep around, you must clearly believe that the negative attributes of her sleeping around magically do not apply to you. Once again "rules f… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:05 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.What overlap of moral mentality exists between a woman who is willing to engage in a one night stand, versus one who is willing to throw away an entire marriage and potentially years wasted? You're acting like they're cut from the same branch when they seem to be entirely different things | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:02 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You name a few men as being representative of the entire sex, yet there's countless men in positions and careers that they wouldn't compromise for a little crumb of pussy. Sorry I have a high opinion of the human population to realize we aren't the same cavemen anymore, and that we're growing as a species. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 05:00 PM |
| 0 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.To your standard, a woman who wants a breadwinner is a horrible person. This is an entirely different circumstance. There's a difference between making a behavioral thing a deal breaker that you yourself do not follow, and seeking out a relationship dynamic that both people agree to | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:58 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I think this sub has bred this idea that if you're a guy who is sleeping around, you're some James Bond like guy. The true determination of how much you get laid, which is never talked about, is simply how extroverted you are. The hottest, most fit guy isn't going to sleep with anyone if he sits inside all day on reddit. There are countless average men who engage in casual sex because they're out at the club every weekend, shooting their shot and approaching women. Many men do not like this fact… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:57 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.There's a difference between a preference, and setting a behavioural deal breaker for a relationship that you yourself DO NOT FOLLOW. I know that low-n women are much more reliable to be faithful. I love their innocence. I think that sluttery damages women in a very inexplicable but very apparent way. Prepare for disappointment when many of them want nothing to do with a former fuck boy. "Rules for thee but for me!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:53 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Can you name a single aspect of a woman who has slept around that is negative and therefore making her not relationship material, that doesn't equally apply to a man who has slept around? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:50 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yeah right and somehow most of the men put in charge of everything important and valuable are literally willing to risk or even sacrifice all of it on a whim just for some pussy You must have an unbelievably low opinion of men to believe this. Have you been surrounded by trashy, low inhibition men your entire life or something? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:45 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I just dislike the redpill for the notion of throwing in the towel and becoming a psychopath | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:43 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her."Rules for thee but not for me!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:39 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Your mental well being is being sacrificed by not getting laid, full stop. Of course, it leads to enormous insecurities and other issues. Maybe it's just me, but I find that much more bearable than the thought of removing the ability for me to see every human being as worthy of a baseline of respect, and adopting this mindset of seeing some women as holes to cum in before maliciously leaving them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:38 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.How has this argument been used so much, that if a woman slept around previously that means you won't be able to know that the child is yours. Stuff like that is the result of cheating, which although may be correlated from n count, is in my opinion dictated by the actual relationship dynamic and things that lead people to cheat. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:35 PM |
| 0 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I'm not denying that it is more difficult for the average man to have slept around than it is the average woman. That being said, the primary value derived from sex is undeniably pleasure. Saying "but mine was harder to obtain" isn't really an argument | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:31 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.We are talking about the value of sex in a non-physical way, a womanizer is consider superior than a "slut" or promiscious woman, because it is rarer and more difficult to be. Or is it because we're still coming from a culture that heavily shames women's sexuality, and actively promotes men who sleep around. There have been countless films, TV shows, etc that portray the stoic male protagonist who sleeps around and doesn't care as something that is admirable. It being harder for a man to sleep a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:23 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Because that makes him an enormous hypocrite. There's not a single reason for refusing a girl who has slept around a lot that wouldn't apply to him as well | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:14 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Seriously, you arent sulking and worried because you already know that you could walk to the end of the block shouting free pussy and someone would accept your offer. You're making enormous assumptions about me. Like everyone else I've been sexually frustrated and definitely had times where it got me down a lot, but again I cannot fathom sacrificing your mental well being just to get laid. Like not even for a worthwhile, long lasting relationship but for literal one night stands. That's just ins… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:13 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Men are happier in marriages compared to women. The fact that women are unhappier in marriages compared to men is likely the reason why they file for divorce more. Also your argument is just nonsensical. Men are able to impregnate many women, but that doesn't mean we're "evolved" to sleep around. Monogamy has been practiced for thousands of years, and is prevalent in other species as well | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:11 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.But most women don't seem to have a problem with men with high n-counts and some even explicitly desire them. There are probably men women who do have a problem with it. How many countless Hollywood pieces portray the stoic guy who sleeps around as rugged and cool? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:08 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It's still all about pussy. Maybe for you, but there are many men who do not operate off of this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:07 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.If every woman in the world suddenly dropped their hookup standards to that of men, the amount of sex would skyrocket. If every man in the world suddenly lost his ability to ejaculate, sex would come to a crashing halt. Sex has value because it makes us feel good. A man might feel better from the chase and might get an ego boost from it, but sex is primarily valued because it gives us pleasure | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:06 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Fair point, the difference of seeing a woman as sexually appealing versus accepting the act with her is definitely different. My argument is for men who would say yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:03 PM |
| 5 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.What a compelling argument | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:02 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.I never said the police should come knocking down your door, but it's important to ground your preferences into reality to avoid the romantic failures that bring men to these god forsaken subs. If I had a friend who had slept with 100 girls but told me his future wife could not have slept with more than 3 guys, I would sit him down and inform him that his delusional expectations are probably going to result in extreme disappointment, and need to be readjusted | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 04:01 PM |
| 4 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Because you're describing the top 1% of men. I doubt many men who care about n count would care then if some billionaire gorgeous girl with DD tits who has had sex with a lot of guys approached them for marriage | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:59 PM |
| 4 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Not really, because I didn't sit around and sulk about getting laid. Yeah jerking it at night would be a little underwhelming, but I'd have plenty of responsiblity and things to do during the day to keep me occupied. If getting laid is the center of your life, you don't have enough going on | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:57 PM |
| 2 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Nothing, but if you come across a girl you're compatible with for a relationship in every way possible, and your only reason for saying no is because she sleeps around, yet you're still down to keep sleeping with her, you're simply a hypocrit. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:56 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.It really doesn't. I don't know how old you are, but there are so many things more important than getting laid, and so many feelings that are greater than it. Not everything comes back to pussy, and many guys operate off of this and do genuinely do things for just themselves or just other people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:55 PM |
| 5 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Nice strawman | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:53 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Well people who follow the TRP are not or used to not get laid, and are not "happy" about that, it is all about getting laid, being more selfish, having more for you, and giving less, it is machismo culture at his finest, and i dont blame them fo adopting the: fuck or be fuck, mentality. "Well things kinda suck right now, better throw away the whole mental wellbeing to get laid I guess." Not going to pretend I know their life story, but that's just so disappointing. Also my main is Cloud Disgust… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:52 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yet men statistically want to be married more than women, are happier during marriages, and are less likely to file for divorce. Watching a 5 minute nature documentary isn't going to do much for you in this argument. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:50 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.This argument is constantly thrown around despite being awful. The value of sex someone obtains is not based off of how difficult it was to obtain. When a guy is bragging about the girl he fucked last night, nobody gives a shit about the events leading up to it or how hard it was, the most obvious question his friends will give him is "how was it?" Sex is primarily for pleasure, and pleasure is the base value of it. Saying that it's not okay for women to sleep around because it's easier, and it'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:49 PM |
| 3 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.Yes. It is. Get a hobby dude, christ. Even in my horniest dry spell I would never compromise my mental well being | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:45 PM |
| 1 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.A situation where you'd want to sleep with someone but understand that you wouldn't be good long term partners can definitely be approached in a healthy manners, seeing as the rise of FWB has occurred. The difference here is when you make that long term partner cut off because they've slept around, despite still willing to sleep with them. It is simple, undeniable "rules for thee but not for me." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:44 PM |
| 7 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.You see, guys hold women accountable for whoring around, women don't. How many men will respect their fellow men as being a "panties collector?" How many Hollywood films made by men have featured these rugged guys who sleep around without a care in the world and are super stoic and cool? Yeah women seem to care less about guys sleeping around against vice versa, but so much of the stigma of it being okay if a guy fucks around comes from other men | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:42 PM |
| 4 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.A woman who has slept around has destroyed her ability to pair bond. You may want to be in a relationship with her, but she would be incapable of remaining a loyal monogamous partner. This is an unfounded, sweeping generalization that is not true. You can argue likelihood, but making the blanket statement like that is simply not true | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:39 PM |
| 6 | It is hypocritical to not want to be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around, if you would still sleep with her.See TRP dont care about fairness and being nice, it is amoral, it is individualistic, it is selfish and centered on male wants. Do you not acknowledge the mental toll this mindset can bring? This sounds like the confessions of an actual lunatic. Is getting laid so important to you that you're going to need serious therapy down the road? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:38 PM |
| 3 | Men who want marriage: would you prefer a virgin, a woman with mild experience, an experienced woman, or a "slut"?You're an enormous hypocrite | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/04/20 03:04 PM |
| 2 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than ageI'll assume that this is a typo and you meant to say "Women" report doing overwhelmingly more household chores. What does that have to do with my question? How does that make them losers? Men often work longer hours, work harder jobs, and work more dangerous jobs across every spectrum of family dynamic. Because even when women are working the same or longer hours, they still find themselves doing a majority of the household work. See the link I posted in the rest of the string | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 08:01 PM |
| 2 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than ageI posted a link below, go through the string | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 07:59 PM |
| 4 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than agehttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/589237/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 06:13 PM |
| 6 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than age"Therefore it stands to reason that a high body count in women will likely lead to divorce" His statement was an enormous misconception | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 06:09 PM |
| 5 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than ageWhen report doing overwhelmingly more household chores across every spectrum of family dynamic. Whether they're working more hours, less hours, earning more or earning less. Married men tend to be much happier than married women, etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 06:08 PM |
| 2 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than ageSo a woman either keeps an attractive husband with a head full of hair, or he goes bald and she divorces him, taking half his stuff in the process, before finding someone else. It's basically a win-win. You're acting like both parties didn't lose in that situation by wasting an enormous amount of each other's time. I think we both agree with each other just from two different perspectives. I think it is wrong that the law hasn't caught up, and that a woman making near the same salary as a man ge… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 05:01 PM |
| 7 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than agesince 70% of the time it's the woman who initiates the divorce and men are overwhelmingly the losers. This could be avoided if statistics didn't overwhelmingly prove that in marriage, women are the losers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 04:55 PM |
| 6 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than ageI know that. But men can use it to filter his potential marriage partners to avoid that risk. Loss of attraction is also an enormous reason towards couples splitting in general. Would it fair as well for women to filter out men who show signs of eventually balding to avoid that risk? Staying together = no divorce rape for men. So men will prefer this option "Divorce rape" yeah that term isn't exaggerated at all. It's easy to tell that you put a magnifying glass under any statistic that helps you… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 04:32 PM |
| 8 | Premarital sexual history is a better indicator of risk of divorce than ageThat's not how statistics work. All it means is that high body count is more likely to lead to divorce, not that it always will. And your entire argument rests on the notion that staying together = good and divorce = bad. Some of the most miserable people on the planet are married | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/04/20 04:20 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?You realize that men and women aren't a monolith? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 11:46 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?If you actually read the success stories from that subreddit, a lot of times especially from the woman the sex died down a lot because the intimacy and overall communication did as well. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 11:04 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?I ask you to consider that perhaps you have skipped a few steps ahead and not thought about how a man without some kind of pickup skills will even stumble into a relationship? Of course to get into a relationship you need to have dating skills, but I don't think even those share much in common with a guy who memorizes some jokes and behaviors to keep a woman engaged long enough to decide to sleep with. If you find that your tactics to find a date that could turn into a relationship are indisting… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 11:03 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?The skills required for a successful longterm relationship are typically things like the ability to compromise on huge things, heart to heart communication, commitment, and other incredibly integral character traits that don't necessarily come easy. The skills for casual sex are much more surface level | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 10:11 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Meanwhile, neither men or women are disgusted by the high n count Chad This is the problem with having your entire viewpoint based off of internet echo chambers. There are many women who would be turned off by a guy who spent his 20s going clubbing every weekend in search of pussy. This entire mindset rests on the assumption that our society is identical to primitive society | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 10:08 PM |
| 0 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?It's not though. Getting a college degree is thousands of hours, getting casual sex can be obtained by an average guy if he's willing to go out to clubs and bars. Yeah you're probably going to get rejected a lot, but average men approaching casual sex with things like tinder and then complaining are just it completely wrong | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:55 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Getting a university degree is an extremely selfish activity: You are not helping anyone or being productive in any possible way. Getting a degree is for people who have a dream or career goal that they cannot obtain without an education. They're therefore driven enough to that goal to put in thousands of hours of work not even for the goal itself, but for the tools to obtain it. Almost all of the most important jobs that keep our society intact require a college degree. It isn't selfish or unpr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:54 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?You're a waste of time | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:49 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Anything that helps you get laid at a bar, is also going to help you keep a wife. The fact that you think the skills required to obtain casual sex are the same for something as complex as a life long partner is genuinely insane | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:48 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?There are plenty of average men who engage in casual sex. Bars, clubs etc and anywhere where there's going to be alcohol and loud music lead to unbelievably different standards than someone swiping on tinder whilst sober in their house. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:47 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?A college degree and 4 years and thousands of hours is objectively harder than going to some sleazy bar or wherever. There are countless average men who participate in casual sex, yeah it's going to be easier if you're attractive but peoples' standards at the club drop astronomically | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:43 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?I never said there's anything wrong with having sex or casual sex, but if you're dedicating most of your free time to it, then there's a bit of a problem. You are made to have sex, meet women, men and fuck. We evolved that way, but our intelligence and the technology that has risen have given us so much more to our lives than just sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:40 PM |
| 3 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Are you trolling? I genuinely cannot tell if you're being serious or not | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:38 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?That is not true whatsoever. A degree is 4 years and thousands of hours. Most guys if they go to sleazy enough places can get lucky | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:32 PM |
| 0 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?attractive women. Change the goal posts and you can never be wrong | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:30 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Judging how respectable something is not off of its actual merit, but by how hard it is to obtain, is incredibly dumb honestly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:26 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Useless information and posturing It is not useless at all, it's one of the primary reasons why men are more likely to want casual sex. The fact that you think the enormous discrepancies between men and women's sex lives doesn't affect how both genders are viewed by society is alarming. Sex is sex is sex. The fact that you think applying millenia old evolutionary behaviors to modern society is accurate is alarming. The reason we think men who sleep around are studs is because of our monkey brain… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:24 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?I'm sure the lives for a lot of men and women who partied their youth away isn't that great, and I'm not here to advocate for women sleeping around. I'm just saying that the double standard TRP attempts to justify is wrong | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:19 PM |
| 0 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?It is subjective, but it's not relative. I think you're using those two terms interchangeably. I can absolutely promise you that the people who spend their youth primarily building towards something long term, whether it be a career, family, personal goals, etc, are much happier later in life than people who partied and fucked their teens and 20s away | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:17 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?That is unbelievably pathetic | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:15 PM |
| 0 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Casual sex is a much greater accomplishment for most men. Yeah I'd need a statistic for that, because those men would be complete morons | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:14 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?A good chunk of guys get a college degree only so that they can attract a mate. I don't know why you struggle with this sexual dimorphism thing. There's a world of difference between doing something to help you find a lifetime partner who you can grow with, build a life together, make memories, etc versus someone you've known for a few hours who you proceed to fuck and then never see again. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:07 PM |
| 3 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?I'm a man. What a lot of men don't realize is when it comes to sex, not only do they always orgasm but they rarely have to worry about their safety either. That's why sex is almost always good sex for men, whereas lots of sex for women turns out to be a negative experience. You can get laid easily and with no issues. The fact that you think a woman having sex is the exact same experience as a man having sex is proof that you really haven't put much thought into this topic as a whole | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 09:03 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?This is why women who always have easy access can't understand men who place it as a high need. And men who always orgasm and hardly ever have to worry about their safety can't understand women who place a much higher filter system on who they'll sleep with. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:58 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?so on are in the realm of your personal opinion. Not really, the whole movement of not partying and fucking your youth away is pretty valid when you see the state of those people once they've gotten older. It is pretty easily demonstrable that a lifetime revolved around fleeting pleasure leads to a lower quality life down the road | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:56 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?That doesn't make them right. Many men see many things as a reward or good | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:52 PM |
| 0 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?So basically, I'd argue it's much better than nothing, I completely agree, it's just limiting yourself to what you could be. Definitely not nearly as much as being obese or bankrupt, but still | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:51 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?a challenge That's not a really healthy way to view sex. Regardless, you're dedicating so much time to perusing short, temporary pleasures instead of building something meaningful. Not only that, but the accomplishments of fitness, financial security, etc become corrupted if they're done purely for the sake of getting laid | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:19 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?I think then men you described who just naturally end up that way make up an unbelievably tiny portion of all men. There's very few people, men or women, who can float by in life like that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:15 PM |
| 2 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?If they do all of it for the sake of getting laid, I don't think much of the change was positive. That's shown by the amount of men who posted on TRP saying that they're fit, financially secure etc and still incredibly angry at their luck at getting laid. The worst part about TRP is that it teaches you to improve yourself so that you attract women, and not to improve yourself for the very sake of it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:14 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?All of that work represents a ton of personal development and growth as a human being - as opposed to "just saying yes" when sex is offered. If all of it was for the sake of sex, I highly doubt there was much personal development there. Vanity can quickly erase accomplishment out of something, every gym has those incredibly self absorbed people who despite how good they look, you can tell didn't really positively change from getting fit. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:12 PM |
| 3 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?Men appreciate when they see someone working hard for what they want and actually get it I think everyone appreciates hard work and getting rewarded. The point is that sex and casual hookups is just temporary fun, and doesn't really have the same merit as something you could work for like a college degree. There's nothing in my opinion to appreciate if someone is sinking so much of their own free time into something like that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 08:10 PM |
| 1 | TRP justifies high N count men due to how much harder it is for them to get laid. How does this not make it even more of a bad argument?I don't understand what the point of this comment is | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/04/20 07:58 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesTrp doesn't lose its shit Peace out lmao | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:31 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesThey are definitely not redpill rejects. Where did you hear that? The problem with MGTOW is that they're not going their own way, they're jaded and bitter men with insane sexist beliefs who have performed mental gymnastics into believing they're single by choice. If you look at a lot of individuals in it, they follow PUA advise and have a lot of shared similarities with TRP. Although MGTOW haven't actually gone out and hurt people like incels, they seem like caged animals when they laugh at bad … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:30 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesTrp does favor trad women while trying to bed sluts. Theres not contradiction there. Different women serve different purposes. If there was a sub for women on how to find men to marry, along with at the same time finding men to scam for free meals or gifts, TRP would lose their shit. It is absolutely a contradiction, you're a delusional dipshit if you think you can treat some women like garbage as "pump and dump" material yet think some traditional church going girl is ever going to want anythin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:23 PM |
| 0 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesI think TRP is wrong about hypergamy, just as FDS is wrong about men being predatory. They have enormously flawed ways of thinking, and a lot of their beliefs come from simple confirmation bias. At least FDS rejects are not like TRP rejects and become violent, aka MGTOW and incels | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:18 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesNowhere did I say trp is advocating for whips and chains if a woman doesn't cook, but you cannot for a moment say that trp hasn't been overwhelmingly in favor of traditional women since it first started. Even the PUA side of trp turning themselves into psychopaths just to get one night stands still have enormous favoritism towards traditional girls, even if it now contradicts their beliefs. The 'shes never yours' mantra has been discussed at length and embroidered into trp doctrine. That is simp… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:13 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesI'm bi myself, and I think an enormous reason why both sides get it so wrong about the other is they treat the other as if they're slaves to the way we evolved, and don't have any free will. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:10 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesThey don't even try to enforce old gender roles onto women. So the countless posts over the years and the insanely detailed strategies on how to find more traditional women, everywhere from simply going to smaller churches to moving to places with cultures more likely to be filled with those kind of women, are all just some tiny percent? 'She's never yours it's just your turn ' This is a recent meme from subs like WAATGM. You're being disingenuous, fuck off. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:06 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesAgree, but TRP warned them that it might not be a savvy/prudent goal. TRP didn't tell anyone what to do or what not to do, it was a very individualistic philosophy: do as you please, it's your life. It's definitely far less rigid than FDS, but that's also led to a lot of reasons as to why it struggled to ever gain momentum. FDS has beyond doubled its followers in just a few months, and even if a lot of the shit they say is wrong, they follow incredibly strict rules. The red pill can't even be ad… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:03 PM |
| 1 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesI think their self advise stuff can be followed, but everything else is easily dismissable. The fact that the divorce rate amongst gay and lesbian couples is nearly identical to straight couples outright disproves both sides' claims about the other gender being trash and such | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 11:00 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesThey also don’t ban women and encourage debate unlike FDS. Fair point, but my observations are just from lurking subreddits for awhile. I'll concede that the red pill ideology itself may accept the idea of women being hypergamous, but the vast majority of followers I've seen rage to no end over other men doing much better than them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 10:58 PM |
| 2 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesTRP mainly trained guys to become Chad, and offer to the "Girls who just want to have fun" what they are looking for: NSA FUN and SEX. Not entirely true, the red pill didn't essentially merge with PUA until recently. It was for a long time like FDS filled with men seeking long term relationships | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 10:56 PM |
| 3 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesI've lurked red pill subs for awhile, these are beliefs shared by an enormous amount of people on there. Stop being disingenuous like that other clown and thinking your mindset speaks for the entirety of that ideology | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 10:55 PM |
| 4 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesThe overwhelming majority of red pill followers are in the anger phase then. I lurk a lot branched subs of them and they're livid. They may still be improving themselves, but to act like most are ok with selective women is disingenuous | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 10:46 PM |
| 1 | Female dating strategy and the red pill have hypocritical approaches to dating that simply try and extract the best of both worlds from traditional and modern gender rolesBoth definitely have great self advise, with female dating strategy teaching women how to be independent, avoid predatory men and the red pill having similar things for overall self improvement. The subs are ruined by the amount of bitter and sexist people who relish in seeing the other gender in some kind of anguish | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/03/20 10:36 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsYou haven't been in a workplace with sexual harassment training where the victims in examples and sliedes all happen to be women and the people commiting harassment always happen to be men. That's because workplace sexual harassment is committed by men the overwheming majority of the time. And they are being discussed in a way where men are almost always the ones who commit it and women are always the ones who are the victims. There are plenty of advocates for having consent both ways and saying… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 02:54 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsNot a good comparison. You can't always know that someone is going to turn out horrible from a single date or few conversations. Look at how many marriages end up in divorce, despite them knowing each other for years typically first | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 02:45 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsThat's not up to men. Never said it was, I would say this to anyone. A society that antagonizes men, that calls them "toxic" Society does not antagonize men or call them toxic. Idiots on Twitter aren't the controllers of society, and the only things called toxic are typically aspects of masculinity that negatively affect your mental health like not sharing emotions. Why would I wanna be? Everything in this paragraph is the result of the law never being able to keep up with society. Divorce favor… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 04:39 AM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsYou said that even after everything average girls would be choosing the attractive guys. By why would the attractive guys be choosing the average girls? You seem to vastly underestimate how many men pretend to be interested in dating or romance, just to ghost a girl once he's slept with her | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 04:16 AM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsLook, when the game rigged and everyone is cheating, only an idiot plays by the rules because it's "right" Someone has to start, someone has to do what is right, because it is right, so that others can follow. There are amazing people out there who help others and look out for the well being of their fellow humans. You can be a part of that, or you can choose not to be. "They're doing it so I will too" is and always will be the thought process of a 5 year old. The difference is, awful women are … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 04:09 AM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsIf you see shit in the world and your decision is to sink down next to it, you need to make major adjustments. There are awful men, and there are awful women. If you choose to be amongst them, that's on you and only you. No amount of bitching about other people doing it is going to change that | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 03:59 AM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsI cannot tell if you're fucking with me, it's like everything I say you interpret in the most outrageous way possible | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 03:49 AM |
| 4 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsWhat makes men sign up for OLD more then? Because many think putting the smallest effort possible and swiping away for a few minutes is going to get them laid | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 03:47 AM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsthen you would have to argue then that women have no right to complain if their pick goes bad. Because after all, they only got the best. People lie to get what they want, a lot of guys will feign interest in dating to get sex | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 03:46 AM |
| 3 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsThe women on those apps are there to be used and discarded. I can't imagine what it's like to have this kind of mindset | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/02/20 03:45 AM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsWhy would they be able to hookup with guys much more attractive to them? Because attractive guys looking for hookups also swipe right on nearly every girl. See the issue? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 11:51 PM |
| 3 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsThe only reason they act that way is because it works. It really doesn't, the overwhelming majority of women do not like that. Sure insanely hot guys can get away with it, as insanely attractive people in general can unfortunately get away with a lot. Women like everyone else just want to be treated like a person | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 11:36 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsExplain how them swiping right on these girls affects me? I literally did in the post. With many men swiping right on nearly every girl, this makes most of women's inboxes swarmed with countless likes. Because of this, and the fact that they're not going to sit on tinder all day, to get through all of those likes they're going to make lightning fast judgements on swiping right or left, likely on just your first few pictures alone. Because of this, it leads to purely physical attraction being the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 10:48 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsThey feed the worst instincts in female selection behavior. I think they feed the worst behavior of both sides. Look at how many aggressive men there are on there who practically harass women who won't immediately sleep with them. I doubt most of them would ever act that way in person | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 10:27 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsI'm pretty sure you are a girl, if not I'm shocked you as a guy dont understand this. I'm a guy, I understand that most men want to get laid. What you don't understand is that this post is aimed at the men who don't realize that not only does swiping right on everyone hurt others' chances, but YOURS as well. If you take 2 seconds to read Tinder's algorithm of how visible you are, you'll understand what I'm talking about. For one girls will go for the most attractive guys regardless, you post pre… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 10:26 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsReread my post? I explained exactly how that hinders your chances of getting matches | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 08:23 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsThere's nothing wrong for wanting hookups, but those who do and swipe right on every girl are the primary reason why girls are only choosing the more attractive men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 07:51 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsNo, don't generalize | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 07:50 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsBeing a single mom is difficult but are you implying every single of them is on welfare? Government literally pays to break up the family unit. Yeah ok buddy | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 06:59 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsAnd all you're really doing is taking a jab at men for supposedly having a less ethical set of wants. 'We deserve it' for wanting what we want is the implication. I never said that, if you're a guy and want to casually hook up than I couldn't care less. The problem is many of them swarm to these dating apps, swipe right on nearly every girl thus giving women thousands of men to choose from. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 06:57 PM |
| 3 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsYou're basically telling men "don't do what gets you laid" Except almost none of them are getting laid by doing that, that's the point. All the matches are going to the most attractive men because of all of these men making womens' inboxes way too big | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 06:55 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsDid you read a single word of my post? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 06:52 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsWhat is the government picking up on exactly? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 05:15 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsYou act as if there's some pandemic of women with super hot boyfriends who don't work and just collect welfare | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 04:57 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsIt's the fact that the guys looking for just hookups are swiping right on nearly every girl | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsI'm not denying that dating apps are horrible in general | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 04:03 PM |
| 3 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsOr you can reserve paragraphs for people you know anything about | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 04:02 PM |
| 3 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating apps"Sorry I stole your car, but my survivalistic instincts kicked in and I really needed to go to the grocery store" like obviously biology controls a lot of our actions but we contradict our instincts countless times on a daily basis | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 04:01 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsI'm a guy, and what I'm saying is demonstrably probable when you look at Tinder's algorithm | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 04:00 PM |
| 0 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsHow lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 03:59 PM |
| 10 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsMake a tinder account as a woman and experience it yourself. The amount of aggresive, casual sex seeking men is insane | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:52 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsEpic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:52 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsThe male to female ratio at most goes off by a percentage point or two, that's not nearly the same as how it is on tinder | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:17 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsYou could build countless men out of all of that straw | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:16 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsThanks for the unsolicited advise and major assumptions that don't apply to me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:16 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsBecause most everyone, men and women, is going to go for the best option they have. If you have 1000 in front of you, you're going to be working hard to quickly filter out a ton until only the most desirable are left | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:14 PM |
| 9 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsWe're wired to want sex with a wide variety of women and that directly leads to the strategy of trying to get with essentially almost anyone. We aren't slaves to our biology though, we have our brains and should use them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:13 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsNo it isn't, because if you take a minute to understand Tinder's algorithm, swiping right on everything makes you less visible | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:11 PM |
| 2 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsIt’s because women are offering up casual sex to Chad that average men think that they have a chance on tinder That only happens on a platform like Tinder. Plenty of average men casually hookup | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:08 PM |
| 1 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsMany people proved that even if men were picky themselves, women would still be picky. How | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 01:06 PM |
| 12 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsIs this a submission for an amateur erotica comic or something, you sound delirious | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 05:15 AM |
| 22 | Men only have other men to blame for the difficulty of dating appsI don't think it's about being picky in general, but the ability to be picky when you have countless options in front of you. I can guarantee you that if given the option out of 1000 women, most men are absolutely going to go for the upper echelon of who they find attractive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/02/20 03:28 AM |
| 1 | Q4M In your opinion, at what number would you consider someone a high N count female? Do you have a cut off number for too high to consider dating?And you'll be alone lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/02/20 02:00 AM |
| 2 | Q4M In your opinion, at what number would you consider someone a high N count female? Do you have a cut off number for too high to consider dating?Good luck ever finding someone lmao, you're kinda delusional | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/02/20 09:59 PM |
| 4 | Q4M In your opinion, at what number would you consider someone a high N count female? Do you have a cut off number for too high to consider dating?Can't tell if you're serious | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/02/20 07:27 PM |
| 1 | Guys have nothing to offer in a relationship apart from sex .My graduating chemistry class is almost a perfectly even split. I'd like to see if the differences in number are what they are because of your claims, or if the way we raise girls and boys have a profound effect on that. For example boys' toys in history like legos and things of that nature involve creating and working with your hands, whereas girls are given barbies. Is that because the children are attracted to those, or because we've simply assigned those to them. I don't think it's not just … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/02/20 10:43 PM |
| 1 | Guys have nothing to offer in a relationship apart from sex .Impeccable logic | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/02/20 06:05 PM |
| 3 | Guys have nothing to offer in a relationship apart from sex .https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem/ Although engineering and computing are at the lower end at 20%, the fact that women make up exactly 1/3 of scientific doctorate degrees is pretty enormous considering how 40-50 years of the door being open isn't as long as you think it is. I'm not claiming that given enough time everything will be 50/50 exactly or that men and women don't have different interests. To claim however that any of the majo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/02/20 03:51 PM |
| 1 | Guys have nothing to offer in a relationship apart from sex .Not because of incentives but because of their general interest in the subject. As someone who's been at a university for 4 years and talked to my piers, it seems like most of you gather your opinion on this topic exclusively from online echo chambers. Believe it or not, the vast majority of women and minorities in college aren't there because of some affirmative action program. Men probably will dominate Nobel Laureates for awhile longer, considering most of them are 60-70+ years old and the to… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/02/20 03:39 PM |
| 5 | Guys have nothing to offer in a relationship apart from sex .Engineering yes, but sciences no. Biological sciences are now majority women, and my graduating chemistry class is almost perfectly split 50/50. The gap has been closing incredibly rapidly | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/02/20 03:24 PM |
| 7 | Guys have nothing to offer in a relationship apart from sex .It's like your entire perception of women is from online echo chambers and you don't actually interact with them. Women are now nearly half of STEM majors and they're not doing silly thought experiments like you're trying to claim. Most of your claims are not backed by anything and you're pulling "facts" out of your ass | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/02/20 03:12 PM |
| 7 | Guys have nothing to offer in a relationship apart from sex .It's hard to be an influential woman if you're prohibited from getting an education lmao. No shit almost every major accomplishment in the fields of science and philosophy were accomplished by men, for most of history they were the only ones allowed to study that subject | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/02/20 02:46 PM |
| 2 | I don't think women's standards are too high, but that because of societal expectations, the average woman is a lot more attractive than the average guy.If you're an unattractive guy then but have a bomb personality, you should be engaging in dating activities that expose more of it. Using apps that stress physical appearance is just setting yourself up for failure, it sucks but that's just how it is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/12/19 08:39 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter