TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Embarrassed_Curve769 Archive

View 1 post and 257 comments by Embarrassed_Curve769 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
157

Social IssuesEmbarrassed_Curve769/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:44 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

To some extent it's women's nature and to some extent the way we indulge them. Women are taught from the youngest age that nothing is ever their fault and therefore assume or develop a habit of never taking responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 07:20 PM
5

Feminist academics are proposing a hostile takeover of masculinity, targeting young men and boys for re-education with 'healthy masculinities'. Which will turn boys and young men into weaklings whom, ironically, women will despise.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 06:00 PM
6

Just approach women the same way most people approach men. The typical way is to attach little importance to a person unless they prove their worth to you. For generations, men have been taught to assume that women are somehow of inherently higher value and clearly that's not true. Treat women with polite detachment. Don't chat them up, don't give them attention, don't flirt (generally speaking), never go out of your way to help them, never compliment (that's a recipe for disaster). If you like …
/r/MensRights07/01/24 05:18 AM
15

For safety reasons, this is a great idea. I've seen women drive.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 02:07 PM
105

Any man who goes to see this movie is a goddamn idiot.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 09:44 AM
6

No alimony, no child support, no problem.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 10:45 PM
3

"Nice guys" as a pejorative term mostly applies to the type of men who act nice not because they are kind, but because they are weak. They struggle to act any different - assertively, confidently, or aggressively - even when the situation calls for it. The other negative type of "niceness" has already been mentioned here. It's the chameleons who pretend to be nice to get into women's pants. Think - a male feminist.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:42 PM
18

Men should be able to cope with most things that are normal life challenges. The problems involve stuff that is completely abnormal, such as false rape allegations with presumption of guilt.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:34 PM
47

He's trying to conflate when a woman acts in a patently stupid and reckless way (for example getting drunk at a party where there is no one reliable to take care of her) with her being guilty of sexual assault itself, which no one ever claims. She's guilty of being stupid, nothing else.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:28 AM
18

"yeah high body count is alligned with certainpersonal disorders so lower body count is better" High body count indicates bad life choices much like red puffy face suggests drunkenness. It's not 100% accurate, but it's close enough to take notice. "men rape more so they are more brutal" Men are more aggressive and do rape more often. There is nothing controversial about it.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:25 AM
88

Another routine false accusation. What will happen to the false accuser? Nothing?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:10 AM
55

Why am I expected to provide everything? Because that's how it's always been. The only difference in the past was that a woman would make you a home, give birth and take care of your children, and loyally support you through life. That's gone now. Men will see a cute girl working the register at a sears and envision starting a future with her. Flip the roles, never. Men care about women's beauty, women care about men's status.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 06:10 AM
16

Women perceive dangerous men as dominant over other men. That's what makes them attractive at a deeply seated biological level.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 08:20 AM
7

Have you ever seen society acknowledge that anything is not men's fault? Accountability is an exclusive domain of men.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:51 AM
72

Star Trek TNG is mandatory viewing in terms of male role models. There are so few of them around.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:10 PM
-1

I asked you to justify why sending men to fight to die is acceptable but forcing women to bear children isn’t Are you not able to answer it for yourself? Very well then, let me spell it out. In healthy societies, women have a sufficient amount of children voluntarily and there is no reason to force anyone to do anything. In unhealthy societies, where extinction becomes a real possibility, drastic measures may eventually become necessary such as quotas for every woman to have at least x amount of…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 02:21 PM
4

If men are going to be forced into harm's way in wartime, don't you think that they should get special privileges in peacetime? Probably.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:54 AM
-3

Who is it that you want to complain to? God? Mother nature? Kermit the frog?
/r/MensRights21/12/23 03:48 AM
0

Maybe, but like I said, women make crap soldiers. Most of them won't meet basic physical requirements.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 03:47 AM
-7

Women can return from abroad. They can't return from the dead. Most of Ukrainians who initially fled the country have already gone back.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 10:07 PM
-12

Forced to give birth - no, but encouraged - certainly. Societies with very low fertility rates are indeed consigning themselves to oblivion and it's a very serious problem. Israel isn't fighting any wars where they take massive casualties. Even now when they are fighting Hamas. I am sure that women are also kept as far away from the frontlines as possible.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 10:05 PM
-20

There is such a thing as biological reality and unless you live in a demented leftist dystopia, you reckon with it. A country cannot afford to lose a substantial portion of its women as it would enter a population bottleneck that would simply destroy it. The loss of men can be recovered from relatively easily. It may not be "fair", but it's factual. Nature doesn't care about "fair". Plus, men are vastly better suited to be soldiers due to their physical strength, greater levels of aggression, an…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 09:42 PM
116

I don't care if women's sports disappear and men who pretend to be women take over. That's perfectly fine with me. As a defender of truth and reality, though, I do feel obliged to speak out and put my voice to the idea that one can't switch biological sex, and that self-identified gender is irrelevant to competitions in which biology is what largely decides the outcome.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 12:46 PM
-1

No sane country would take women to a real war.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 07:35 AM
43

Well, first of all, every larger corporation has "diversity" efforts, which really just means "fewer white people". The recent leaked comments by IBM CEO are only a tip of the iceberg: https://uk.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/obviously-illegal-elon-musk-slams-ibm-chief-arvind-krishna-over-leaked-video-on-diversityfocused-hiring-practices-3266669 ​ Also, here's a great example for medical schools: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/new-chart-illustrates-graphically-racial-preferences-for-black…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 02:33 PM
43

If you are a job candidate as a white male, you have a far lesser chance of getting the position than an equally skilled minority or even a slightly less skilled one. It evens out only when there is a big disparity in qualifications.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 02:13 PM
239

By "diversity policies" he means anti-male and anti-white policies. Damn right they will be under attack and hopefully soon go the way of the Dodo.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 12:02 PM
6

When I mention that men make up for the majority of homeless people, suicide rates, and victims of homicide, they go, “well who set that system up?” Or “by other men.” Plenty of women are running the system today. So why isn't it changing?
/r/MensRights16/12/23 10:20 PM
5

Meaningful discussion requires talking about things that are uncomfortable and often unpopular.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 07:59 AM
26

You didn't address the comment above. Why do you have a problem with a relatively small and relatively VERY tame subreddit that may (oh my lord!!!) sometimes criticize women, but you don't have a problem with vile anti-male hatred that goes on at TwoX and other similar subreddits? This subreddit is within the site ToS, those aren't.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 07:57 AM
19

Reddit is a leftist hellhole so man-hating comes with the territory.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 07:35 PM
34

Women aren't lying about it consciously from what I gather. They will say things like "I want a man who is in touch with his feelings and emotions and is able to express them". Women love the idea of such a man, but when they meet one in real life, they feel nothing but disgust. Some of the brighter ones figure out that maybe an emoting man is not what they want after all, but the majority simply think that there is something wrong with that particular man and invent some reasons ("he's creepy",…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:43 AM
30

Women don't have double standards. Their actions simply don't match their words, but the standards are very consistent and that's masculine men.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:31 AM
60

You can't fool biology.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:29 AM
25

The thing is, that subreddit is SOOOO obviously against the site ToS, but of course reddit doesn't move a finger. It shows that ToS is not worth the price of toilet paper but that it can be turned into a cudgel against undesirables (wrongthink people).
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:34 PM
16

Do an experiment and create a profile on a dating site as a woman. Put some semi-attractive pic on it borrowed from the interwebs. It's guaranteed that you will be getting pages and pages and pages of messages from desperate men right off the bat. So women are not lying about this particular thing. Even plain Janes get an inordinate amount of attention.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 06:00 PM
77

It's more acceptable, certainly. There are subs on reddit like the TwoXX one, which spew such undistilled anti-male hatred, that any normal person would recoil in horror and disgust.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:27 PM
2

I think people should be able to say anything in the public sphere with the exception of: proverbial yelling 'fire' in a crowded theatre calls for violence breaking the law in general And by "able to say anything" I mean that you should be able to do it without fear of retaliation from others. It's not free speech if you're going to get socially/financially/professionally cancelled if you state an opinion that differs from the majority. We should have a consensus as a society that we respect spe…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:01 PM
1

Those 8 billion people for the most part don't carry my genes, that's one thing. The other is that populations are not the same. I care for the survival of my society, others can worry about themselves.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 10:10 AM
2

How do you expect society to continue if people don't procreate? Blame biology for the fact that it's masculine men who predominantly get to procreate - it's still a fact. All of the exceptions like feminine men and gay men exist, and that's fine. But they will never be the backbone of society. That's biologically impossible.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:38 AM
1

We have freedom, but on a societal level we need men and women to pair up and have babies. Otherwise we go extinct. And these much villainized traditional gender roles are the best for that. So we shouldn't discourage people from taking them on. Quite the opposite. BTW... this sub exists precisely because traditional gender roles have collapsed and society is a hot mess.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 10:55 PM
2

That actually is largely true, or not so much earnings as status. Fairly or unfairly, men are rated on and valued for primarily for their social status.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 10:42 PM
5

The idea was sold to women that being "just a mother" is equivalent to failure in life, and that real success is in being a "girlboss" corporate drone.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 10:35 PM
3

Women who want to work certainly can, but the destruction of the family unit along with borderline villainization of motherhood was a terrible crime committed on our society.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 10:33 PM
46

Classical liberal on social and moral matters, fiscal conservative, free speech near-absolutist, atheist.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 10:24 PM
17

We don't need stupid Muslim law. We need traditional Western values, which are vastly superior to anything the world has produced.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:58 PM
7

Don't engage with crazy unless you have the stomach for it.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:18 PM
87

Remember when Stalin had that guy edited out of a picture? That ended really well so Scotland is clearly doing the right thing.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:22 AM
166

But harping on people to get married from high up in the ivory tower fails to engage with the reality on the ground that heterosexual women from many walks of life confront: that is, the state of men today. I dare NYT to post an equivalent article that calls women of today utter garbage like they did with men.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 07:09 PM
14

Porn, like many things, is harmful in excess. If a man simply uses it to get his mind off of sexual matters and do more productive things instead, then there is no harm done. It's the guys who spend hours every day on perusal of porn and the gratification is the goal in itself - that's where it becomes a problem.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 09:14 AM
11

But what is actually happening in our world is that the top 80 women are chasing the top 20 dudes. And not only that, the guy at the top has even more optionality and might have 5-10 women to himself. This leads 80 men to fight over 20 women at the bottom. It's even worse than that. The top 80 women share the top 20 men. The remaining 20 women share the next 10 men. The remaining men are generally fucked and wait until some women give up on the competition for alphas.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 09:10 AM
31

Only a small subset of all men create a lot of immediate attraction in women. These men monopolize a very large segment of the female population. The best of the in-demand men, those who want to start families, are taken off the market quickly. So that leaves the players, now an even smaller set of attractive men, who must be shared by vastly more women. Men who are not in-demand blend into the background or disappear completely from women's sight, which creates a perception of all men wanting j…
/r/MensRights24/11/23 06:38 PM
106

She has discovered that laying on a yacht in a skimpy swimsuit is both easier and more lucrative than competitive gymnastics.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 03:07 PM
14

Yes, as a leader you are expected to make decisions based on incomplete information and to shoulder the uncertainty of whether those decisions are correct, which can be very stressful. Further, you need to be able to defend your decisions when they are challenged, because they will be.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 08:04 PM
36

Men don't care one way or the other if a woman is strong and independent unless she falls into one of the extremes. As for nice guys, it's OK to be a nice person as long as you are capable of being not so nice when the situation calls for it. Otherwise it isn't really niceness. You are simply too weak to be assertive and that's what turns women off.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 07:45 PM
0

She might, but probabilities are not exactly the same.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 08:16 AM
49

The victim, a sociologist So a mentally ill leftist. No surprise there. The victim would later attempt suicide during mandatory suicide, the lawsuit states. Fabulous writing.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 06:10 PM
45

It's not like men don't want to marry. There are two major obstacles though: 1. Women have outlandish expectations in terms of a man they can get to commit. At the same time women bring very little to the table themselves. 2. Extortionist divorce, custody, domestic violence laws, all of which are ridiculously anti-male.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 11:32 AM
21

One thing that really drives me up the wall when I hear it is various 'learned' halfwits who confidently proclaim that "women fare worse in isolation than men". Of course there is no reliable way to measure that (it's not like men just LOVE to be locked up and isolated), and no one has even tried, but in order to justify prioritizing women's welfare in yet another area, this little nugget was cooked up to bring to the table whenever convenient.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 09:08 AM
2

Asianese
/r/MensRights20/11/23 07:04 AM
23

Take that misogynistic male pigs!
/r/MensRights20/11/23 05:47 AM
25

One lesson here is to never invite the government into your home if there is literally any other choice.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:00 AM
1

Also they compete for the fittest males available as you said, but they are a lot better at sharing it seems. This makes evolutionary sense. A woman doesn't care so much if she is a man's exclusive sexual partner. She is guaranteed that the children she births are biologically hers. So sharing a high status man has historically been perfectly acceptable for women and it wasn't just a function of the patriarchy as feminists like to tell themselves or anybody who will listen. Men are in a differen…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 08:13 PM
1

The best 'deal' available at a given time might not be a man in the top 20%. Also, have you never gone out on a date where you were just lukewarm about the girl?
/r/MensRights19/11/23 08:01 PM
7

Nature doesn't care about an individual's happiness. As you've already noticed, it's the survival ability that counts, and it just so happens that competition between males is a good thing for the species. It's worth noting that women also compete albeit less directly. Women try their very best to attract the fittest males possible, which is why they go to extreme lengths in attempt to beautify themselves, including breast augmentation and other plastic surgeries.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:42 PM
54

Quotas are not about equality, which is merit based, but rather equity, which is an inherently biased and unfair system. We don't need more quotas - we need none.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 05:56 PM
1

Whatever your problems were, they had nothing to do with you being 17 instead of 18.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 06:03 AM
1

I live in the real world and I always tell the truth, even if the truth is unpopular. Especially when the truth is unpopular.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 05:22 AM
0

So the 'kid' will not be traumatized one day after his 18th birthday? You should teach that to the dozens of countries (like Germany, Italy, Denmark, France) where the age of consent is between 14-17. Tell them they are doing things wrong. Also, look up in the dictionary what a pedophile is. A quick hint - it's someone attracted to prepubescent kids. Just because most people are ignorant, and use the term wrong, doesn't mean you have to be.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 04:37 AM
2

There is literally nothing in the linked article about rape. No one even alleges that coercion took place. The word 'rape' has now been distilled so much by broad and fallacious application that it lost most of its intended meaning.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 06:45 PM
0

I have the right to say whatever I want. You have the right to agree or disagree with what I say.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:31 PM
-10

I was 17 years old some years ago. I wasn't vulnerable. Like I said though, I can't speak for girls. No experience of being one.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 02:47 PM
-8

Are you brain damaged?
/r/MensRights18/11/23 02:30 PM
-16

I am all for calling out women's bad behavior, but let's not act insane in tune with this fucked up society. There is absolutely no damage to a 17 year old man who has sexual relations with a woman. Nada. I don't know if the reverse is true as I was never a 17 year old girl, but I was a 17 year old boy, so I do know that with 100% certainty.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 06:10 AM
57

The quick answer is - no. The public has a very high tolerance for male deaths.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:40 AM
23

Is that why everyone parses it by gender?
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:38 AM
106

Women do not make less money than men. Not in the only stat that matters: same compensation for same work. I know it's horseshit, you know it's horseshit, people who make these ridiculous claims know it's horseshit. It doesn't matter. The lies never stop.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 02:04 PM
3

We are not far away from AI being able to hold a very good conversation. Even today's ChatGPT could play a convincing "AI girlfriend" if it were trained in that direction. Coupled with AI generated imagery, it could work really well. So I am really hoping that men who throw away heaps of money on OnlyFans thots will convert to virtual companions. Still not the healthiest substitute, but probably cheaper and way more reliable. I expect that there will be a strong pushback from women who will lobb…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 08:53 PM
2

This matter is very simple. Until someone has caused an accident, there is no argument for why they should pay higher premiums. If someone has caused an accident, they should pay more irrespective of gender.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:36 AM
39

Max privileges, min responsibilities
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:15 PM
13

MSM: "...and that harms women the most because..."
/r/MensRights14/11/23 07:52 PM
188

Who, exactly, is Ms. Camino supposed to marry? She's 37 years old and a single mother. That's 15 years and one child too late to find a good man.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 04:30 PM
1

Canadians are now a nation of pathetic clowns. Sad to see.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 01:08 PM
2

I wouldn’t have had my mental health sorted without my therapist who was a woman. Whom you pay for services. That's not your friend.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 09:24 AM
10

Agreed. Stay away from reddit.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:59 PM
2

It's just like with 'equal pay' demands altogether. Women expect CEO pay, not her lawn maintenance dude's pay.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 04:04 PM
16

There is nothing liberal about this audience.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 06:17 AM
138

Always remember the rules when approaching women: Be attractive Don't be unattractive
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:47 PM
2

The ideas were not rejected. It's just difficult to sell something to women outside of clothes and beauty products. Domain website business model is also generally hurting as so much stuff has moved over to social media giants.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:56 PM
3

That is a nice cesspool.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:38 PM
2

Unlike most perhaps, I am not happy about it. It's not as if the women who think that way will disappear from the planet. This is how leftists think - block speech and the idea itself is gone. I am not that naive, and I would rather have insight into the worst that women have to offer with it completely out in the open.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:29 PM
32

After reviewing the answers, let's just say that it'd be wise to never ever fuck with us Very smart from these women. I wonder how many are dead now because their men finally had enough and hit back.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 07:26 PM
4

It's better to have evidence than not have it. It might not always save you, but at least you can let the world know the truth when the time is right. There is no foolproof method, but if you can cover yourself 99% of the time, then you are better off than most.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 03:25 PM
1

Egalitarianism is a luxury, not the norm.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 10:40 AM
54

Do not flirt with women at work. Do not socialize either, other than what is absolutely necessary. No one-on-one meetings, no mentoring, no favors. NEVER give compliments. If at all possible, do not go for any after hour entertainment if women are going to be in the company. Date only women within your social network. This can be hard if your network is small, but if that's the case, then maybe work to expand it first. It's much harder for a woman to make false accusations if your friend group s…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:49 AM
129

'A missing lever that we really ought to embrace on the right is greater sexual responsibility for men, codified in the law, in an era of genetic paternity tests: put more of a burden, financially and otherwise, on the father when it's a confirmed paternity test,' he said. Sure, let's just make sure that a paternity test is mandatory and a man who is not a father has zero responsibility for the child. Let's see who comes out better off from that deal.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:12 PM
174

I don't know if it's more biology or nurture, but women never take responsibility for their own actions. There is some extreme form of bias in their thought process, which makes it seemingly impossible to see their own faults and yet they actively project those faults on others.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 04:09 PM
1

This is about young women who are in great demand in the relationship marketplace. Older women will mostly be single and not by choice.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 05:48 AM
158

A lot of women date the same small subset of men, which is made a bit larger by a greater age span of these men. We thought that a harem (1 man - N women) is a fixture of patriarchal societies which oppress women, but it appears to be more of a natural state.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:39 PM
643

Along with like 80% of men, but you know, women most affected.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:56 PM
2

The choice should be between 10 years in prison and 20 years in a mental asylum.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 05:36 PM
33

Stop acting like a doormat.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 05:16 PM
37

And I am telling you, correctly, that terms and conditions cannot break laws: https://ironcladapp.com/journal/contracts/what-makes-a-contract-invalid/ All terms of your contract must not contravene any federal or state law. If the formation or performance of the contract will require a party to break the law, the contract is invalid. There are laws saying that advertised services must be truthful and small print in ToS will not protect you: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/truth-advertisin…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 12:16 PM
55

You can't put it in your ToS that fraud is legal.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 11:12 AM
92

Showing fake matches as an enticement to pay should be grounds for a lawsuit though.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:16 AM
1

*2nd *3rd
/r/MensRights02/11/23 09:14 AM
119

It's good that we have a free preview of the abyss that is the female soul.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 05:03 PM
44

As I recently mentioned in another thread, sociopathy and psychopathy are running rampant among modern women. They don't even understand how demented their behavior is.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:22 PM
9

NEVER APOLOGIZE IF YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG Edit to add rule #2: never put your apology in writing when you do apologize to someone you can trust whom you actually offended in some way.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 01:25 PM
54

Oh it's absolutely massive. First of all, a very significant percentage of rape/sexual assault/harassment allegations are false, but that's only the tip of the iceberg. Far more common are everyday occurrences such as when a woman doesn't like a coworker, she'll go to HR and say: "he makes me uncomfortable". It won't take long before that guy is fired or pushed out of a job.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:35 AM
63

Most women don't go this extreme, but low-key sociopathic behavior can be seen very often. For example how coy women are about making false allegations against men, and how dismissive other women are about this phenomenon happening.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:27 AM
263

Women under 40 have never lived in a world where they are accountable for their actions. It's no wonder that they increasingly act like sociopaths.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:00 AM
9

But hopefully somebody else will think about it and decide they're not going to engage in sexist behaviors that are literally common feminist talking points. Stating facts is not sexist behavior. It's just stating facts. That's not how the idiom "let it slide" works. I am using it correctly, and Merriam Webster agrees with me by providing this example of use: You were late this morning. I'll let it slide this time, but don't let it happen again. "Let it slide" implies that you are in a position …
/r/MensRights28/10/23 05:06 PM
8

I refuse to let that behavior slide simply because ""my side"" is now doing it, and I will call it out, as that is me "doing me". You seem to have a vastly overgrown sense of self-importance. I don't care what you say or do, it's not going to have any bearing on me. It's not in your purview to "let something slide" or not, because you aren't any sort of a decision maker.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 04:14 PM
15

"On average" does not mean cover nearly as much as a blanket statement does. So you thought that my initial statement was "lIteRaLly 100% oF WoMEn"? I'm not talking about "censoring words" Yes, you are. You do you and I'll do me.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 03:47 PM
23

In a feminist sub, you can bet "men are way too confrontational, hence why they tend to end up above women" It's a biological fact that men are more aggressive and more confrontational, on average, than women, and those traits tend to put people in leadership roles. This kind of thought process that we should censor our words and not speak the plain truth because someone might get offended is ludicrous to me.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 03:08 PM
166

Women don't like confrontation. It's one of the reasons why fewer women organically end up in leadership roles.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 11:30 AM
16

There's more but this subject makes me sick, so I'll stop here. Rosin is the latest in a long line of feminists who dream of eugenically cleansing the earth of men. If she really means this, then she should stop accepting any goods or services provided by men. Otherwise she is just full of shit (which of course she is).
/r/MensRights27/10/23 10:07 AM
10

Good advice. Never offer an apology if you have done nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:05 AM
3

It definitely won't be one who wants donated sperm.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 05:32 AM
2

They didn't care about restricting education, as long as the people produced from it aligns with their ideology. Which is restricting education.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 10:45 AM
12

She's only the prime minister, clearly the patriarchy is oppressing her.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 06:45 AM
9

I am only surprised that ancient sexual misconduct allegations against Musk haven't materialized yet. I am sure they are coming soon though.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 05:53 AM
19

Government are bought, academics live in a their own little cloud of pseudo intellectual onanism. Academics can hide in ivory towers, for now, but it won't be that long before they are dragged out by their hair and bullwhipped on the way to the gulags. The communists have done it before, as they had zero love for "intellectuals", and the same kind of ideology is taking over today.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:22 PM
53

I got massive amounts of side eyes from all the girls. Stick to your guns and they'll be all over you. Women can't resist men who show big balls.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:00 PM
35

It's the market that dictates pay. Millions of men are in shit jobs. There would only be a problem if men and women were not paid the same for doing the same jobs.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 10:38 AM
37

In an even society, shouldn’t men and women choose those jobs evenly? No. Men aren't women and women aren't men.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 10:28 AM
5

They are trying to emulate men by doing that, ironically.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 04:57 PM
22

Grapists are the worst. And the PUAs who you will all lust after and compete for, but only a few of you will get to sample short term. PUAs were a laughable breed, because they had this core concept that being "cocky and funny" gets you women. They meant it for a one night stand, initially, which might work, but of course most men actually want a relationship with a woman they like, and then it completely breaks down. You can't "cocky and funny" your way through paying for a nice dinner or havin…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 12:55 PM
73

when it comes to all out fair tests that demonstrate raw obsessive achievement is there a gender pattern ? Of course there is a pattern. Men typically win all skills based competitions.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 03:25 PM
21

No, there isn't. Men didn't evolve to have higher testosterone, large muscle mass, and proclivity for taking risks by laying about. Also, any tribal society had to be extremely careful to protect the lives of its women more than men as losing a big chunk of the former was an inevitable population bottleneck.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:45 PM
38

Anything above 10% is preposterously bad.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:07 PM
85

I just read about a real life version of the "isn't there someone you forgot to ask?" meme. Woman finds out a guy in his 30s dated a girl 13 years younger. She writes a story with their details, except in her story the guy is a creep. Women who are unattractive and/or getting on in years absolutely hate it if men enter relationships with younger women, so they are doing their best to pathologize any kind of age difference. The younger generation is unfortunately very susceptible to such propagan…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:46 PM
7

It's fine as long as there is no child support. If there is child support, then paternity tests need to be mandatory.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:59 AM
85

That's not 'radicalization'. That's common sense. There is no medical rationale for circumcision - it's a barbaric practice.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 05:46 PM
75

The first issue is that no school should be conducting an 'investigation' of this type.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 09:50 AM
3

If you set a fire to a building, you're a psychopath. If you set a fire to a building with people inside, you're a sociopath.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 07:05 AM
31

Yes
/r/MensRights16/10/23 04:41 AM
20

It's not obvious at all. The common argument from people in developed countries is that they choose not to have children because it's too expensive, so they wouldn't be able to provide for them sufficiently to give them a good start in life. But that doesn't hold under scrutiny. If people are given greater prosperity, they choose to have even fewer children, even though they could quite easily afford it.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 08:05 AM
28

Every country that gets to a certain point in economic development runs into falling birth rates. Ironically, being wealthier makes people less likely to have children. So the more you have materially, the less willing you are to part with it.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 07:54 AM
-2

Two things: The OP is not the only person here. It's far more important for hundreds of men to hear and learn what NOT to do, than anything that the OP decides to do next. Shock therapy is pretty much the only way left when everything else fails. Given the information that the OP has given, he needs to rebuild himself from scratch to become a functional person and that's a huge overhaul from the present state.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 07:25 AM
-29

I mean, I don't even know where to begin as this is like a litany of everything that men should not do. Getting married to a psycho, putting up with repeated abuse, losing control of oneself, crying like a little bitch instead of fixing problems, no spine, no resolve... I guess this is what feminized upbringing leads men to become.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 09:51 PM
6

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract\_id=2063742 We found that when considering requests from prospective students seeking mentoring in the future, faculty were significantly more responsive to Caucasian males than to all other categories of students, collectively, particularly in higher-paying disciplines and private institutions. This is hilarious! It's leftists in academia who are the biggest racist bigots. The jokes write themselves. It's like the Soviets in the 1930's when they …
/r/MensRights14/10/23 07:53 PM
4

Do you not understand how an argument works? The burden of proof falls on you Clearly you don't understand how the internet works. There is no burden on me whatsoever. Then provide the information. I commented a link to prove you wrong. The unemployment rates? You provided a source that proves me right. White men are so resourceful and productive that hardly any are unemployed despite blatant discrimination against them in corporate HR/recruiting departments as well as "affirmative action" (aka …
/r/MensRights14/10/23 07:24 PM
5

Prove they were inferior candidates. I don't have to prove anything. It's free information. Take it or leave it. Biden, a white male is the leader of the US. 10 of the 26 members of Biden’s cabinet are white males Was a single one of them appointed because he's a white male? This is not the point here. All 500 members of congress could be clone Eskimo dwarfs as long as they were the best candidates picked on merit.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 06:32 PM
9

Yes, this is why management is now full of diversity hires. Managers usually have very generic skills and they are a dime a dozen. With middle-manager ranks swelling to gargantuan proportions it is also very easy to hide in those jobs for years on end without making any meaningful contributions. Serious tech jobs, on the other hand, require hard skills.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:24 PM
10

The question might as well be 'Are you white?' It is.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:22 PM
15

When clearly inferior candidates get jobs instead of you, it is discrimination. Especially since this is no secret. Things have gone so far that corporations pretty much openly say that they will hire anyone except white men. For high profile examples outside of the corporate world, look at Biden and Newsom appointees for the SCOTUS and the US senate. They pre-determined not only skin color, but also genitals of the 'winning' nominees without even looking at the candidate pool.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:20 PM
-1

What in the flying fuck are you talking about? I am the only one who offered some constructive advice among all this pitiful whining.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 11:02 PM
-21

That definitely sucks. What was the lead up to the accusation though? Also, if you're not going to be charged, much less convicted, then you shouldn't have problems finding a job. You may need to move somewhere else if you live in a small-ish community where people know each other. Sad but true. In the longer term, you can research what steps you can take to get justice. It might take many years, but hopefully the false accuser will get her comeuppance.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 09:45 PM
-34

That would be difficult since you didn't provide any background information.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 09:39 PM
-49

TMI
/r/MensRights13/10/23 09:33 PM
8

Context: A drag queen I follow There's a problem right there. Cishet men * Normal men I have seen one side already in the comment sectiom of that video, might as well check the other extreme, right...? The truth is not always in the middle. You have the right idea, of course. It's an awful thing to do to villainize people based on rumors.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 04:35 PM
61

The results are clear: attractive man catcalling = enjoyment unattractive man catcalling = fear That's the difference between flirting and crime.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:08 PM
9

They don't get respect. Whether they deserve it or not is a separate question.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 01:38 PM
19

Men are respected when they make it to the top. That's what the competition is about. The problem now is that there is no "top" anymore. The rewards are not worth the effort.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:00 AM
18

Yeah, she's probably on a bunch of feminist subreddits, so she would be banned on the spot if they realized she has posted anything here. Free speech has no right to exist in progressives circles. It's considered too dangerous.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:30 PM
3

That's the first sign that an accusation is almost certainly false. Unless somebody went to the police first and they had nothing to go on (which of course can happen), making accusations public without involving the authorities is a smear tactic.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:57 AM
2

To escape responsibility/accountability
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:55 AM
2

Most are terrible, promoted based on DEI demand. Luckily I run my own company, so I seldom have to deal with that crap.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 08:38 PM
5

A potentially inflammatory statement (that generally doesn’t apply to this sub), to be sure, but feels like when men suffer from issues, even ones that affect them collectively, it feels like other men miss no opportunity to drag him down further to make themselves feel superior. A lot of it stems from feminization of men. The last two generations, at least, have grown up with very few male role models, indoctrinated into feminine patterns of thought and behavior from their earliest years, force…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 06:55 AM
16

Pathological fear/hatred of men is evident on many, or all, 'feminist' subreddits. Instead of recognizing that this is a mental issue they must personally confront, they put the blame on men and expect the world to cater to their maladies.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 05:28 AM
4

You mean like now?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:47 PM
7

Pretty sure that's only a matter of time before virtual girlfriends powered by AI will be able to re-create any experience that OnlyFans can provide for a fraction of the cost.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 06:46 AM
23

The vast majority of CEOs are men (in fact, it was only this past April that women CEOs finally outnumbered CEOs named John.); 93% of world leaders are men; 87% of billionaires are men; 84% of all Pulitzer Prizes awarded in the last 100 years went to men. The vast majority of geniuses are men. That's the reason. Everyone should care! Women should care! No man left behind! Historically, men are the only ones who benevolently helped others from a position of power. No one has ever done it before a…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 05:50 AM
64

This sub is a great opportunity to talk about men’s rights and move forward for total equality between genders. If we are going to have equality, we need to eliminate inequality. How are we supposed to do that if we don't talk about specific examples? However, it’s just devolved into dragging women at every possible opportunity. Maybe women should stop giving us so many opportunities by acting better? you get an option to actually have progressive conversations Fuck 'progressive' conversations. …
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:51 PM
9

Is there a place where we can both meet in the middle? It was invented ages ago. Equality.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:32 PM
25

Yes, her lizard brain is working overtime to find justifications for why she is going to dump him.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:55 PM
7

Save the giraffes!
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:35 PM
13

I am sure that you could put this "professor's" class content on BabylonBee and it wouldn't look out of place.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 06:33 PM
37

Well, we live in the present, it hardly matters what happened 50+ years ago. Also, it's not a given that things were "far worse" for women in the past. Men were always considered expandable, performed the most dangerous jobs, got sent to fight and die in wars. For every man in a position of power, which is what women use as a reference point, there were dozens, if not hundreds, of men who had absolutely no power and their lives were miserable. To put it in perspective - historically, only a smal…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:41 PM
63

Yeah, they (women) have problems which definitely outweigh ours Do they? Men get to experience: shorter lifespans vast majority of the homeless vast majority of suicides majority of murder and violence victims significantly higher sentences for the same crimes as women registered/drafted into the army by legal obligation female only work programs/scholarships/job fairs, nothing equivalent for men affirmative action favoring women over men vastly greater funding for breast cancer research/treatme…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:11 PM
30

based on their naturalistic morality (what's good for women is good for humanity) Yes, and also "what's good for raising children is good for running a society of adults".
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:40 AM
7

Don't worry. America isn't going to last long. It's a matter of time before states begin to secede, starting with Texas and Florida.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:37 PM
273

The nonprofit says it believes allyship from men is important and noted it cannot ban men from attending due to federal nondiscrimination protections in the US. Translation: we would if we could.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:52 PM
53

The annual conference and career fair aimed at women and non-binary tech workers Did Wired just assume my gender? I demand a quadrillion dollars for my trauma.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:51 PM
7

She doesn't consider men to be human. They are utility tools.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 10:25 AM
26

Mr McCrory was said to have touched the arms of waitresses at the dinner where he had been a guest speaker. Oh the horror!!! The problem here is that there is no accountability for the prosecutors and also for the false accusers. Prosecutors can work completely outside of the law in filing malicious, groundless charges while accusers can make up the wildest stories. Only in some rare cases, where circumstances line up just right, do the fabricators face any repercussions for trying (and often su…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 07:27 AM
11

I am definitely not suggesting that you should be a 'nice guy'. Quite the opposite. Don't make women a priority in your life. Invest in yourself and spend your time productively. Then women will come and you can pick a quality one.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:13 PM
12

Women claim to be romantic but in reality they are not, they love receiving but not giving. It's even worse than that. Women don't really like receiving, they only think they do. If a guy is a doormat who panders to a woman, he will lose her respect in short order.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:24 PM
23

I don't know anyone who is happy in life based on sleeping around. It may be a thrill in the very short term, but it's ultimately empty and vapid. The more people you put on your 'score card', the less intensely you will experience future relationships, even the potentially meaningful ones. This is especially true for women, but men are affected as well. You don't want to numb yourself like that.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:20 PM
14

#Believe all women
/r/MensRights02/10/23 12:09 PM
3

The number of prior relationships and partners is a much better indicator than age. Add to that a woman who has a good set of moral principles and things will usually be fine. Women over 30 are right at the end of their fertility lifecycle and conception becomes much more difficult.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:50 PM
5

Unless you can get a woman under 30 with conservative values as your partner, you are much better off single.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:36 AM
-1

how is a society a "free society" if they have to force people to defend that society I already explained it. Nothing is free in terms of cost. Some people have to make great sacrifices in order for many to live in a free (not in terms of cost, but personal liberties) society. There is no other way. The military draft is a horrible thing, but the alternative is loss of independence. If you trace it through history, it's SOOO much easier to lose independence than to regain it. An opportunity to d…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:01 AM
-3

People just refuse to accept that nothing in life is free. Living in a free country is not free. It required huge personal sacrifices on the part of our ancestors, and it may require sacrifices from us as well. A free society can only exist in a stable and safe country. Such a country can only exist if it has secure borders. Secure borders require a lot of protection, and that protection requires a strong military. In many cases, a voluntary professional army may be sufficient, but also in many …
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:49 PM
27

Feminists historically wanted equality of privileges without equality of responsibilities. Now that they have equality of privileges, they want surplus privileges and still no responsibilities.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:42 PM
0

I am actually certain that there will be more and more 'women' who don't transition. That way you get all the perks of identifying as a woman without having to mutilate your body.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 06:00 AM
7

It shows a complete misunderstanding of what makes a good female character. It's one of the reasons I don't watch Hollywood garbage or any woke shows. They are absurd.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:38 AM
12

I am very close to using the term 'female' exclusively. 'Woman' means nothing anymore given that it can be a hairy dude with a penis.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 07:40 PM
9

So why don’t you do something to stop male Vs. male violence instead of making this about your hatred for feminists, considering we aren’t a threat to you. Why haven't you stopped false accusations against men yet?
/r/MensRights29/09/23 10:55 AM
3

It's funny when criminals pretend they have a moral code. But yeah, even in their case, there is less of a likelihood of going after women.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 10:54 AM
4

We can break down exactly how this works. Women want men to approach, because it's an uncomfortable thing to do with a high risk of rejection and embarrassment. Obviously women don't want to put themselves out there. Men should do that. At the same time, women want approaches only from the men they are attracted to. All other men should clairvoyantly know to stay away. If they don't, they are fair game for a harsh rejection, ridicule, or if needed, a false sexual harassment accusation (which equ…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:17 PM
15

Women love the idea of men talking about their problems, but not the reality of it. It's a trap of sorts where if a man falls for it and spills his heart out, he will be mercilessly derided.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 07:35 AM
9

Exactly this. I don't need to talk about my problems. I prefer solving them. Women seem to think that what works for them, what they need, also applies to men. It doesn't.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 07:33 AM
28

It's obviously abuse and taking advantage of vulnerabilities to extort money. But an adult has the right to hand out their wealth, so technically it's 'legal'.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 03:56 PM
193

In other words - it wasn't a problem when men were killing themselves with alcohol, it's only a problem now when women do it too.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 11:14 AM
1

Pair bonding isn't going to end completely, but the nature of it is changing very fast. A prosperous society requires intact families as they bring stability, safety, motivation to strive, follow basic societal rules, and raise well-adapted children.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 08:06 AM
71

Women don't mind a certain level of misogyny as long as it comes from a man who exudes masculinity. That's where the "bad boys get the girls" stereotype comes from, and like most stereotypes, it has a lot of truth in it.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 07:46 PM
-1

Who decides what's worthy or unworthy of a man? Politicians? Military? God? First of all - survival. Societies where weak men predominate collapse really quickly. The point is, this sub is about Men's RIGHTS. Not about DENYING MEN their RIGHTS, whether through legislation or by telling them what's worthy or unworthy and calling them cowards. You have to be a man first, then you can have rights. It's only men who are, and the only ones who can be, the guarantors of rights. So you need to have str…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:52 PM
-6

There are many ways to live a good, honorable life as a man, but that doesn't mean every way is commendable. Running away from responsibility for defending one's homeland is a cowardly act, unworthy of a man. To paraphrase Vito Corleone: women and children can run away from tough situations, not men.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:21 PM
-7

Being a man is not about doing what you want, it's about doing what needs to be done.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:03 PM
-8

There are men who are willing to fight there. But there are also those, who don't want to end their lives in their 20 or 30s, who are scared, who try to escape the country or get an exemption from the draft. There are some weak men everywhere. The majority stayed to fight, otherwise the country wouldn't exist anymore. I happen to know a lot about Eastern Europe because that's where I am from. Dude, your comment is a pure American fantasy about "good, old-fashioned" place, "where men can still be…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:43 AM
5

It's a perfect illustration of why feminism is hogwash. It's not about achieving equality, it's about giving women preferential treatment in every situation. All privileges of men, and then some, with none of the responsibilities. Not one feminist has made the call for 50/50 quotas on the frontlines like they do for corner offices. Now let's consider, though, whether a 50/50 military quota would make sense. It wouldn't, of course, even ardent feminists and their simp white knights know this. Men…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 05:29 AM
18

Modeling is a field where women far out earn men. That however is driven largely by the very real difference in the demand for male models vs female models. Of course it is. The market dictates that and everyone understands. Notice though how female football (soccer) players demanded, and won, equal compensation as their male counterparts despite massive difference in revenues generated by male vs female competitions. Or how female tennis players are now getting paid the same in tournaments as m…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 05:59 PM
25

The problem is with how it's being communicated to kids. Let's take these two statements: "You don't need men to succeed!" vs. "Your success is in your own hands!" One is highly divisive and combative, the other is not.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:45 PM
9

This has led to an absolute dumpster fire that culminated in a new hire that we just got accussing me of sexual harassment because I was according to her “too nice” and must have ulterior motives. How were you informed of this? If you ever have another conversation with management/HR about it, make sure to record it. Demand that any allegations be put in writing and inform the company that you are going to take them to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:24 AM
20

The legal system ignores illegal quotas that favor women. Still, it's good to gather evidence and report bias/discrimination of this type. Change begins at ground level.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:19 AM
2

The logic here is that groups normally criticize their own and ignore the bad behavior of other groups Literally nobody has a problem with criticizing straight white men. It's only straight white men that are hesitant to criticize everyone else.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:39 AM
45

There is zero medical reason for circumcision. It shouldn't even be practiced.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 09:32 AM
9

There is no patriarchy. Women have the same chance (or even better) of becoming CEOs and other big honchos as men do, there are just fewer women who want to dedicate their life to accomplishing that, even aside from the fact that at the top end of intelligence men are the majority. The only way to have a 50:50 ratio would be to institute illegal quotas and abandon merit, which many countries are trying to do anyway despite it being a terrible idea.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:46 AM
8

It's never going to happen because there are more male geniuses, and men are also a lot more aggressive and obsessive in pursuit of goals.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:04 AM
13

Feminists look at the 0.1% of men who are at the peak of the piramid in terms of status and think that that's a typical man's experience. They don't consider the fact that an average man lives a much more difficult life than an average woman, which is why homelessness and suicide are overwhelmingly male-specific problems. A woman will almost always find somebody who will help her in a pinch. Men can only rely on themselves and should something go wrong, society turns its back on them in a heartb…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:06 PM
35

It is unconstitutional and illegal, but everyone is so used to skirting the rules when it comes to discriminating against men that it doesn't even register.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:02 PM
4

Decades old allegations are almost always false and should never be admitted in court. Any brain specialist speaking honestly would admit that we don't have reliable memories after that passage of time, so even if a person thinks something happen to them, there is no way to distinguish memories from dreams, fantasies, or delusions. Of course nobody actually wants to have an honest discussion about that as it would destroy their careers.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:20 AM
4

Men are not meant to be stay at home dads. It goes against every biological imperative. So no matter how much this loony society tries to normalize it, it's never going to be normal, or comfortable, or beneficial to anybody, especially the children. Fathers are extremely important, but not when they are playing mothers.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:35 PM
60

Male on a dating website: "Hi" Australian regime: "That's sexual harassment!"
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:23 AM
14

Prof Sir Steve West, the vice-chancellor of the University of the West of England and president of Universities UK until earlier this year, said: “As expulsion is a penalty, parents of the accused often start to raise the stakes by hiring a lawyer. It is a power game, because usually the victim has no representation, and I think it is completely unacceptable and unfair. But it's acceptable and fair to expel someone from the university without evidence, right? Turd.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:50 PM
13

As the number of serious sexual assaults escalates across universities, experts say female students often do not want to go to the police, fearing delays and traumatising questioning, and knowing only 1% of rape cases end in conviction. They don't want the scrutiny. It's much easier to go through university kangaroo courts and face no cross-examination on the way to destroying someone's life with false accusations. A study soon to be published by researchers at Oxford University found that one i…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:48 PM
3

A men's rights legal group would be immediately declared illegal, demonized, and its members harassed as sub-human garbage.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:04 AM
5

If a guy has consistently struggled with relationships and social interactions, then one positive experience isn't going to undo many years' worth of negative ones. How is it that you thought that it would? It's a step in the right direction, not a magic pill.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:45 AM
4

Where do you have a source that says Brand knew about the allegations for years? I looked at several and that's not stated in any of them. Also, why would he care if I "lap up" his defense? I am not going to help him in any way. If he actually wanted help, he would stick with leftists to have the media, politicians and big tech cover for him like they continue to do for hunter Biden. I already explained that quite clearly.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:40 PM
12

You are the one who will believe anything, apparently. If Russell Brand thought that accusations were pending against him, then it would be hands down more beneficial for him to move even further left in order to have mainstream media run cover for him. If you know anything at all about how the world works right now, then you must know this to be true.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 06:01 PM
23

There is schadenfreude in that, but it's also frightening how permissible this culture is towards destroying men's lives through libel and false accusations.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:53 PM
29

The left moved away from him until he couldn't handle it anymore. It's not a coincidence that so many people went through the same thing: Dave Rubin, Tim Pool, Joe Rogan, even Bill Maher, the most liberal of all liberals. Now they are all called right wingers. What do you want to bet that there will be sexual misconduct allegations against one or more of the above people within the next couple of years? It's the standard operating procedure of the left as it's the easiest way to destroy a person…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:51 PM
2

The problem here is that the guy is not making enough money and he's fine with it. She wants to be rich.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:40 PM
143

The most reliable way for a man to end up alone is to listen to what women say they want.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:15 AM
2

If the parents can find consensus privately, then they can do so. If they can't, they go to court. In case someone is not fulfilling either the private agreement or court decision (let's say - the father is absent and non-supportive), then that abdication of responsibility can be thoroughly documented over some period of time and then brough to court. Everything works. A prenup signed under duress is an outlier situation that we can't use to make law. We could similarly say that we cannot have l…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:28 AM
16

This is fine as long as a few things are fixed: no child support payments if a mother decides to raise a kid alone against the father's wishes (cases of PROVEN abuse excepted of course) every marriage should require an unbreakable prenupt, which would generally stipulate that each person takes away what they brought into the marriage or have earned during the relationship end the practice of family/divorce courts favoring women abolish VAWA, which is a blatantly misandrist legal act false accusa…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:51 PM
18

There really isn't. You can either be a feminist or you can be a man. You can't be both.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:55 PM
27

There is no such thing.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:08 PM
11

That's the whole point. Dress as slutty as possible to attract attention, then complain about it for additional points. Hard to even blame women for exploiting the world's stupidity with this.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:30 PM
7

No wonder, they live for such 'opportunities'.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:42 AM
29

Actual lesbians are like 2-3% of women. The influx of LGBT people in recent times is just a fad and people wanting to be seen as original.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:58 AM
2

You are on reddit. So you are...
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:43 AM
8

The first thing you do is you don't worry what other people think.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:02 PM
31

Leftist control of language is a method of terrorizing the population into submission. Declare a word 'problematic' and then begin the process of unpersoning the people who continue to use it. It's a test. If you obey, then you are a good little serf and you can live another day before you run afoul of some other absurdity that you finally cannot tolerate. If you don't obey, then you are no longer considered human and any terrible thing that happens to you, or is done to you, is fully justified.…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:17 PM
7

Here's my experience of women in science. Infatuated male middle managers, spoon-feeding the proteges they'd hired. Ughh, this was my experience when working in the corporate world as an IT consultant. There was a steady stream of pretty young women hired right out of college and the company wanted to hire them so much to bolster their sex ratio credentials. The first thing that virtually all of these women did, was to start flirting with their direct manager or the manager above him, obviously …
/r/MensRights14/09/23 02:53 PM
115

"Man dies a horrible death - women most affected" -- routine media story
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:27 PM
39

I don't know about an illness, but women routinely abandon men who run into problems (job loss, legal trouble - including absurd false accusations).
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:32 AM
46

Budweiser - obviously Nike - various anti-male ad campaigns, paying race grifter Colin kaepernick zillions while employing child labor in Asia Wired magazine - notorious for anti-male articles Meta, Alphabet - both promote anti-male rhetoric and suppress criticism of such slander
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:16 AM
11

There is no question that the CCP promotes feminization and demasculinization of western men. They know very well that weak men are a death knell for societies.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 07:44 AM
7

Men and women are not the same. Desire and drive for competition is much greater among men, so what feels excessive to you is normal for men.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:00 AM
17

You are better off without desperate, weak men in your life. Look for higher quality male friends. They are our there.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 09:31 PM
3

It is due to feminism, because it's feminism that is pushing the idea of "toxic masculinity", which is extended even to young boys, and consequently normal behavior is pathologized. It's not exactly a difficult connection to make and I shouldn't have to explain the obvious.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 06:23 AM
2

You were wrong on every point. What are you still trying to argue?
/r/MensRights04/09/23 05:15 AM
3

I hear the MensRights advocates talk about this idea ad nauseum, but can you give me one just example of this occurring? How many boys are now "diagnosed" with ADHD? According to Google it's 11.7 freaking percent! I guarantee that the actual number is less than 1%, the rest are simply overmedicated to compensate for healthy behavior of boys who tend to be unruly. Not surprisingly, three times as many boys are diagnosed with ADHD as girls, because boys and girls are not the same and it's not even…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 09:02 PM
3

Girls raised like boys are equally rambunctious and hard to control, which kinda implies is not about gender, it's about the parameters in which we raise them. You are basically illustrating my point. There is this insane tendency to try to equate boys and girls as though they are biologically the same. They are not and they never will be the same, on average. This is exactly the source of the problem in that boys are now expected to act like girls or else they are punished/medicated. It's demen…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 06:16 PM
135

It's an outcome of "feminist" upbringing. In the demented minds of today's parents, mothers especially, boys are supposed to act the same as girls. So they are not supposed to be rambunctious and hard to control. But of course this is exactly how healthy boys behave as they are not the same as girls, who are generally far more submissive to parental authority. The feminist solution is to resort to drugs and to medicate "toxic masculinity" out of boys. The fact that it causes untold emotional dam…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 05:09 AM
10

The only benefit that "male feminists" see is that simping for women will get them closer to women. It's not going to work, women are repulsed by simps, but "male feminists" don't know that.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 07:23 AM
418

Nobody has the right to "maintain the quality of life". This is a bizarre divorce court invention basically designed to fleece men out of money. Circumstances change all the time. People lose jobs, switch careers, get sick -- no one gets to stay rich as some kind of inherent right. It's absurd to the utmost.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 05:50 AM
14

Women will almost hate each other. I asked my friend one day why this could be the case, and he said it's because women are competing with each other non-stop. It's kind of funny. Men assess women mostly by looks. Only later personality and other traits come into play. Women assess each other mostly by looks as well and typically, when two women meet, they tax the other to see who has the looks advantage. Whether you are the winner or the loser in that match-up, you probably don't like the other…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 07:53 PM
84

Naturally, the feminist reply was to legislate infanticide laws, that only women can be charged with and let's them walk away scot-free when they do it! This is why you can never expect accountability of women. It's almost like they have none of whatever makes one feel responsible for one's actions.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 01:01 PM
93

She's like a laundry list of mental issues. Checks every box.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 07:40 PM
37

Buy him a beer. He'll appreciate it.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 05:45 PM
28

Yet nary a peep about the unprecedented human suffering happening right under the population’s nose. They don't care about any human suffering, merely want to gain power by forcing everyone to obey their dogmas. That's why the trans stuff is everywhere. A sexual aberration is shoved in everyone's faces so that they are supposed to pretend it's the new normal.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 02:38 PM
5

It's a holiday dedicated to castigating men. All sorts of sanctimonious imbeciles will be able to rail and rant about the "evils of patriarchy" and how "all men are rapists", and no one will be allowed to tell them to shut up and get lost. That's really the point of this important holiday.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 08:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter